Quality assessment of the preparation and storage of leukocyte-depleted pooled platelet concentrates.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using a disposable platelet storage bag containing a leukocyte filter to prepare leukocyte-depleted pooled platelet concentrates with the buffy coat method. METHODS: 150 bags of whole blood samples (400 mL/bag) were stored overnight at 22 ± 2°C, and buffy coats were separated on Day 2, then 5 units of ABO homotypic buffy coat and 1 unit of plasma were pooled into a disposable platelet storage bag containing a leukocyte filter to prepare leukocyte-depleted pooled platelet concentrates and stored in a Platelet Agitator. On Day 2, 4, 5 and 7 after the collection of whole blood, platelet content, pH value, pO2, pCO2, glucose (GLU), ATP, and other quality indicators were measured. RESULTS: The quality indicators of leukocyte-depleted pooled platelet concentrates met the requirements for leukocyte-depleted aphaeresis platelets in the Chinese national standard Quality Requirements for Whole Blood and Blood Components (GB18469-2012). With the prolongation of storage time, MPV and PDW of platelets gradually increased, pH value, bicarbonate, and GLU gradually decreased, LA, LDH, and ATP gradually increased, pO2 slightly increased, pCO2 decreased, and HSR had no significant change. ESC decreased significantly on Day 7, CD62p decreased first and then increased, sP-selectin and GP V increased first and then decreased, but the results on Day 7 were higher than those on Day 2. CONCLUSION: The quality of leukocyte-depleted pooled platelet concentrates prepared by the buffy coat method using disposable platelet storage bags containing a leukocyte filter was comparable to that of leukocyte-depleted apheresis platelets, and could be used clinically.

Study on platelet components production in 19 provincial blood centers in China before and during the COVID-19 epidemic / 中国输血杂志

【Objective】 To study the changes of platelet components(PC), apheresis platelets (AP) and pooled platelet concentrates (PPC) production of 19 provincial blood centers before and during the COVID-19 epidemic. 【Methods】 The data related to the collection of AP and the preparation of PPC from 2016 to 2021 of 19 provincial blood centers was collected. The production of PC, AP and PPC during the four years before the epidemic (i.e. 2016-2019) and during the COVID-19 epidemic (i.e. 2020 and 2021) were calculated respectively, and the change of production was analyzed. 【Results】 The total production of PC in 19 blood centers steadily increased from 2016 to 2019, with a decrease of 4.16% in 2020 and an increase of 15.60% in 2021, exceeding the output before the COVID-19 epidemic. In 2020, the production of PC of 42.11% (8/19) blood centers decreased compared with 2019, while 94.74% (18/19) in 2021 increased compared with 2020. The changes of AP output was basically consistent with the trend of PC. The total production of PPC in 2017 and 2018 both doubled compared to the previous year, while decreased by 67.98% in 2019, increased by 30.38% in 2020 and decreased by 27.08% in 2021. 【Conclusion】 The total production of PC kept increasing steadily between 2016 and 2019, but decreased in 2020 under the COVID-19 epidemic, with some blood centers being significantly affected. In 2021, with the strong support from government and various measures by blood centers, the total production of PC increased.

A general change of the platelet transfusion policy from apheresis platelet concentrates to pooled platelet concentrates is associated with a sharp increase in donor exposure and infection rates.

BACKGROUND: We compare the actual with the potential donor exposure and possible infection rates in the Hanover Medical School (MHH) platelet (PLT) transfusion recipients if the current MHH standard of apheresis PLT concentrate (A-PC) supply would be replaced by a pooled PLT concentrate (P-PC) transfusion regimen. DONORS PATIENTS AND METHODS: The electronic records of the MHH Institute of Transfusion Medicine and the MHH Department of Medical Controlling were evaluated to assess the development of PLT needs and supply at MHH from 2003-2006. For 2006, we evaluated all PLT transfusion recipients with respect to their overall transfusion needs, classified them for low and high PLT transfusion needs, and related them to the diagnostic groups that underlie their PLT demands. We assumed a P-PC preparation procedure using 4 whole blood-derived buffy coats for all calculations for potential donor exposure. To predict the possible infection rates of an unrecognized viral infection with low prevalence in the general population to A-PC or to P-PC recipients and the influence of neutralizing agent specific antibodies (NAB), we established a mathematical contamination/infection model based on the current PLT transfusion mode and data about GBV-C virus infection among Hanover blood donors. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2006, the 1,300-1,400 persons comprising MHH apheresis donor pool covered a 36% increase in PC transfusions. The exclusive use of P-PCs instead of A-PC would require a total of 36,240-49,276 whole blood donations to meet MHH demands, corresponding to a more than 1 log step increase in donor exposure. For individual hematological patients, the change to P-PCs would imply an 80-125%, for individual surgical patients a 40-50% higher donor exposure. Our infection model revealed an approximately 4 times higher infection. CONCLUSIONS: A change to P-PC would imply a more than one log step higher donor exposure, and an unrecognized infection with a prevalence around 1% leads to an up to 4 times higher infection rate. A general change in the PC transfusion policy that favors P-PCs is dangerous and must be avoided.