Prognostic awareness and willingness to explore prognosis in older adults with cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Prognostic awareness varies widely among older adults with cancer. Accurate prognostic awareness helps to ensure delivery of care that is aligned with the patient's goals. Understanding factors associated with poor prognostic awareness in older adults with cancer may help identify which patients may need interventions to improve prognostic awareness. In this study, we assessed factors associated with poor prognostic awareness in older adults with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of older patients with cancer referred to a geriatric oncology clinic at the University of Rochester. We provided paper questionnaires for patients to complete prior to their clinic assessment. Questionnaires asked patients to estimate their overall life expectancy and the life expectancy of a person of the same age with normal health. Prognostic awareness was considered poor if patients estimated living at least as long as a person of the same age with normal health. We assessed independent demographic and clinical variables (age, sex, race, income, religion, living situation, education, marital status, and cancer type and stage), aging-related factors (comorbidities, cognition, depression, social support, nutritional status, and physical function), and willingness to discuss prognosis. Factors significant at p ≤ 0.15 on bivariate analyses were included in the multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: We included 257 patients; the mean age was 80 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.8, range 55-97), 37% were female, 71% were White, and 44% were married. Nearly two-thirds of patients (62%) had poor prognostic awareness: 7% estimated they would live longer than and 55% estimated they would live as long as a person of the same age with normal health. Half (49%) were willing to discuss prognosis, 29% were not, and 22% did not answer. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with poor prognostic awareness were older age [one-year increase; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.12], race other than White (AOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.09-5.06), unwillingness to discuss prognosis (AOR 3.33, 95% CI 1.54-7.18), and stage I-III cancer (vs. stage IV, AOR 3.83, 95% CI 1.8-8.17). DISCUSSION: In a cohort of older patients with cancer, approximately two-thirds had poor prognostic awareness. Older age, race other than White, stage I-III cancer, and unwillingness to discuss prognosis were associated with higher odds of poor prognostic awareness. Interventions aiming to improve patients' prognostic awareness may need to gauge patients' willingness to discuss prognosis.

Prognostic awareness and prognostic information preferences among advanced cancer patients in Kenya.

BACKGROUND:  Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Kenya. Yet, little is known about prognostic awareness and preferences for prognostic information. AIM:  To assess the prevalence of prognostic awareness and preference for prognostic information among advanced cancer patients in Kenya. SETTING:  Outpatient medical oncology and palliative care clinics and inpatient medical and surgical wards of Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) in Eldoret, Kenya. METHODS:  The authors surveyed 207 adults with advanced solid cancers. The survey comprised validated measures developed for a multi-site study of end-of-life care in advanced cancer patients. Outcome variables included prognostic awareness and preference for prognostic information. RESULTS:  More than one-third of participants (36%) were unaware of their prognosis and most (67%) preferred not to receive prognostic information. Increased age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.07) and education level (OR: 1.18, CI: 1.08, 1.30) were associated with a higher likelihood of preference to receive prognostic information, while increased symptom burden (OR= 0.94, CI: 0.90, 0.99) and higher perceived household income levels (lower-middle vs low: OR= 0.19; CI: 0.09, 0.44; and upper middle- or high vs low: OR= 0.22, CI: 0.09, 0.56) were associated with lower odds of preferring prognostic information. CONCLUSION:  Results reveal low levels of prognostic awareness and little interest in receiving prognostic information among advanced cancer patients in Kenya.Contribution: Given the important role of prognostic awareness in providing patient-centred care, efforts to educate patients in Kenya on the value of this information should be a priority, especially among younger patients.

The association of prognostic awareness with quality of life, spiritual well-being, psychological distress, and pain severity in patients with advanced cancer: Results from the APPROACH Study in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced cancer patients' understanding of their illness is key for making informed treatment decisions. Despite the known importance of patients' awareness of their disease prognosis, it is debatable whether this awareness is positively, negatively, or not associated with clinical and psychological outcomes among patients with advanced cancer. This paper aims to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with prognostic awareness and its association with quality of life (QoL), spiritual well-being, pain control, and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. METHODS: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was part of a multicountry study titled "Asian Patient Perspectives Regarding Oncology Awareness, Care and Health (APPROACH)." Patients were asked what they knew about their cancer and treatment. QoL and spiritual well-being were measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp) questionnaire. Psychological distress experienced by patients was recorded via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Pain severity was also assessed. Data from 160 patients were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients who participated, 55 (34.4%) were unaware of their cancer stage. Those who were aware of their stage of cancer were younger than those who were not aware (45.7 years vs 50.4 years, p = .015). There was no significant difference in spiritual well-being and other domains of QoL between those who were aware and those who were not aware of their advanced cancer stage. There was also no significant difference in anxiety depression or pain severity, even after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. SIGNIFICANT OF RESULTS: Given the high prevalence of patients who wrongly thought their cancer was curable, more could be done to improve disease and prognostic understanding among patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. Those who were aware of their advanced cancer stage did not have a poorer QoL, nor did they have more anxiety or depression than those who were unaware. This finding suggests that concerns about the negative impact of prognostic disclosure may be unfounded.

Prognostic awareness and prognostic information preferences among advanced cancer patients in Kenya

Background: Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Kenya. Yet, little is known about prognostic awareness and preferences for prognostic information. Aim: To assess the prevalence of prognostic awareness and preference for prognostic information among advanced cancer patients in Kenya. Setting: Outpatient medical oncology and palliative care clinics and inpatient medical and surgical wards of Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) in Eldoret, Kenya. Methods: The authors surveyed 207 adults with advanced solid cancers. The survey comprised validated measures developed for a multi-site study of end-of-life care in advanced cancer patients. Outcome variables included prognostic awareness and preference for prognostic information. Results: More than one-third of participants (36%) were unaware of their prognosis and most (67%) preferred not to receive prognostic information. Increased age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.07) and education level (OR: 1.18, CI: 1.08, 1.30) were associated with a higher likelihood of preference to receive prognostic information, while increased symptom burden (OR= 0.94, CI: 0.90, 0.99) and higher perceived household income levels (lower-middle vs low: OR= 0.19; CI: 0.09, 0.44; and upper middle- or high vs low: OR= 0.22, CI: 0.09, 0.56) were associated with lower odds of preferring prognostic information. Conclusion: Results reveal low levels of prognostic awareness and little interest in receiving prognostic information among advanced cancer patients in Kenya. Contribution: Given the important role of prognostic awareness in providing patient-centred care, efforts to educate patients in Kenya on the value of this information should be a priority, especially among younger patients.

Coping and Perception of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (iNHL) are a heterogenous group of mostly incurable diseases with prolonged illness courses and prognostic uncertainty. Yet, studies evaluating coping and perception of prognosis are limited. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults newly diagnosed with iNHL in the past 3 months at a single academic center. We assessed quality of life (QOL: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), psychological symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping (Brief-COPE), and perception of prognosis (Prognosis Awareness Impact Scale). RESULTS: We enrolled 70.6% (48/68) of eligible patients. Patients had older age (mean = 66.9,sd = 10.5), were female (60.4%), predominantly identified as White (85.4%), and had at least received a college degree (75%). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (39.6%) and follicular lymphoma (33.3%) were the most common diagnoses. Overall, 27.1% and 14.6% of patients reported clinically significant anxiety and PTSD symptoms, respectively. Patients highly utilized acceptance (56.2%), seeking emotional support (47.9%), and denial (47.9%) as coping strategies at diagnosis. While 66.7% of patients recalled their oncologist assessment of illness as incurable, only 35.4% reported that the illness is unlikely to be cured. Overall, 45.8% indicated that they were worried about prognosis and 31.2% reported perseverating on their prognosis. Higher emotional coping with prognosis was associated with fewer anxiety (B = -0.6, SE = 0.2, P < .001), depression (B = -0.3, SE = .1, P = .005), and PTSD (B = -1.3, SE = 0.4, P < .001) symptoms and better QOL (B = 1.7, SE = 0.4, P < .001). DISCUSSION: Patients with iNHL report substantial psychological distress, a diversity of coping strategies, and complex cognitive understanding of their prognosis. Interventions, which address prognostic uncertainty and promote positive emotional coping with prognosis, may ameliorate psychological distress in this population.

Changes in Prognostic Beliefs of Patients With Metastatic Cancer and Their Association With Changing Health Status.

BACKGROUND: Patients' prognostic beliefs are known to influence treatment decisions. However, the evolution of these beliefs over an extended period in patients with metastatic cancer is understudied. We assessed longitudinal changes in prognostic beliefs and investigated their association with patients' changing health status. METHODS: We surveyed a cohort of 600 patients with solid metastatic cancer every 9 months, up to 54 months. At each time point, we assessed whether patients believed their current treatments would cure them (responses classified as accurate, inaccurate, or uncertain belief) and tested the association of their response with symptom burden and recent unplanned hospital admission. RESULTS: Only 29% of patients had accurate prognostic belief at baseline, and 24% of patients changed from having accurate to uncertain/inaccurate belief at some point during follow-up. Patients who experienced greater symptom burden were less likely to report inaccurate (relative risk ratio [RRR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) or uncertain prognostic belief (RRR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92), whereas those with a recent unplanned hospital admission were more likely to report inaccurate (RRR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.48-4.94) or uncertain belief (RRR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.34-4.07) compared with accurate belief. An increase in symptom burden was associated with change toward accurate belief (RRR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31) as opposed to no change. CONCLUSIONS: In our study of long-term changes in prognostic beliefs among patients with metastatic cancer, reported prognostic beliefs were unstable, changed from accurate to inaccurate/uncertain and vice versa, and were associated with their changing health status. Our findings imply that conversations about goals of care must occur regularly to factor in these changes.

How Patients Cope Throughout the Course of an Incurable Cancer.

Patients cope in different ways when living with an incurable cancer. These varied coping styles impact how oncology providers communicate with patients. If providers do not tailor communication with a general understanding of how a patient is coping, this risks miscommunication with the patient, inaccurate disease understanding, and suboptimal care. This review explores the spectrum of coping patterns that influence a patient's behaviors and communication with their oncology team throughout a cancer course. We then review several strategies to assist with coping in order to provide more transparent communication throughout the cancer course. Patients express coping styles on a spectrum, from "avoidant" to "resistant" to "engaged." The "avoidant" and "resistant" coping styles often impede transparent communication between patient and provider due to expressions of unrealistic hope by the patient. Several communication skills can improve patient coping and readiness to discuss prognostic information about the cancer, which will better facilitate conversations around end of life and readiness to stop cancer treatment and initiate hospice when indicated. Understanding the spectrum of coping styles and stress responses by patients and families can improve shared understanding between patient and provider as well as a sense of partnership with patients and families.

The Next Best Thing: Three Key Conversations to Convey Prognosis Over the Course of an Incurable Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Waiting until a person is very near end of life to discuss limited life expectancy risks lower goal-concordant care and increased utilization of medical interventions with lower likelihood of benefit at the end of life. Medical training on communication skills in serious illness often focuses on early and late conversations regarding prognosis, with no guidance on navigating the conversations occurring in the middle of the illness course. GOAL OF THE REVIEW: We propose a new framework for identifying and discussing prognosis at various points along the cancer course, as a continuum from beginning to end, that is prompted by changes in clinical status and number of available remaining cancer directed interventions. DISCUSSION: SPIKES is a framework utilized for early conversations in a cancer course. REMAP is a framework utilization for late conversations in a cancer course. There is a gap in guidance on how to navigate conversations that occur between the early and late phases of a cancer course. We describe 3 general phases of care during a cancer course ("early," "middle," and "late"), with each phase warranting specific communication skills in order to improve patient understanding of prognosis, goal concordant care, and best practices for healthcare utilization in the acute and end of life care settings. CONCLUSION: Framing prognosis by available medical interventions through a framework of "early," "middle," and "late" adds clarity to the phase of illness, expectations around delivery of information to the patient, and framing of recommendations at each given phase.

Can Oncologists Prompt Patient Prognostic Awareness to Enhance Decision-Making? Data From the NEOetic Study.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-neoplastic therapy improves the prognosis for advanced cancer, albeit it is not curative. An ethical dilemma that often arises during patients' first appointment with the oncologist is to give them only the prognostic information they can tolerate, even at the cost of compromising preference-based decision-making, versus giving them full information to force prompt prognostic awareness, at the risk of causing psychological harm. METHODS: We recruited 550 participants with advanced cancer. After the appointment, patients and clinicians completed several questionnaires about preferences, expectations, prognostic awareness, hope, psychological symptoms, and other treatment-related aspects. The aim was to characterize the prevalence, explanatory factors, and consequences of inaccurate prognostic awareness and interest in therapy. RESULTS: Inaccurate prognostic awareness affected 74%, conditioned by the administration of vague information without alluding to death (odds ratio [OR] 2.54; 95% CI, 1.47-4.37, adjusted P = .006). A full 68% agreed to low-efficacy therapies. Ethical and psychological factors oriented first-line decision-making, in a trade-off in which some lose quality of life and mood, for others to gain autonomy. Imprecise prognostic awareness was associated with greater interest in low-efficacy treatments (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 1.31-3.84; adjusted P = .017), whereas realistic understanding increased anxiety (OR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.65; adjusted P = 0.038), depression (OR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.23-3.11; adjusted P = .020), and diminished quality of life (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.75; adjusted P = .011). CONCLUSION: In the age of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, many appear not to understand that antineoplastic therapy is not curative. Within the mix of inputs that comprise inaccurate prognostic awareness, many psychosocial factors are as relevant as the physicians' disclosure of information. Thus, the desire for better decision-making can actually harm the patient.

The associations between prognostic awareness and health-related quality of life among patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic awareness among patients with advanced cancer is important for better palliative and end-of-life care. However, the relationships between prognostic awareness and patient health-related quality of life outcomes remain inconsistent across studies. Critically synthesizing empirical literature will allow for a better understanding of these associations. AIM: To investigate the associations between prognostic awareness and health-related quality of life outcomes among patients with advanced cancer. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review, prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020177228). DATA SOURCES: Seven databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched in March 2022. Cross-sectional and longitudinal empirical studies in English were included regardless of cancer type or publication date. RESULTS: We identified 1338 articles and included 36 for review. A substantial proportion of patients remained prognostically unaware (50%). Prognostic awareness was either not significantly associated (48%) or associated with worsened (40%) outcomes. These associations were found to vary (e.g., be differently associated with improved, worsened, or non-significant health-related quality of life outcomes) based on the definition of prognostic awareness used and the population sampled (Asian vs Western). Few structured, validated questionnaires were used and only three studies investigated how the associations evolved over time. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate better understanding of the relationships between prognostic awareness and health-related quality of life, future research must focus on developing a standardized, "gold standard" measurement of prognostic awareness. Research should also examine the influence of culture and the evolution of these relationships longitudinally.

Factors associated with cancer patients' distinct death-preparedness states.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Facilitating death preparedness is important for improving cancer patients' quality of death and dying. We aimed to identify factors associated with the four death-preparedness states (no-preparedness, cognitive-only, emotional-only, and sufficient-preparedness) focusing on modifiable factors. METHODS: In this cohort study, we identified factors associated with 314 Taiwanese cancer patients' death-preparedness states from time-invariant socio-demographics and lagged time-varying modifiable variables, including disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on end-of-life (EOL) issues, and perceived social support using hierarchical generalized linear modeling. RESULTS: Patients who were male, older, without financial hardship to make ends meet, and suffered lower symptom distress were more likely to be in the emotional-only and sufficient-preparedness states than the no-death-preparedness-state. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.95 [0.91, 0.99] per year increase in age) and greater functional dependency (1.05 [1.00, 1.11]) were associated with being in the cognitive-only state. Physician prognostic disclosure increased the likelihood of being in the cognitive-only (51.51 [14.01, 189.36]) and sufficient-preparedness (47.42 [10.93, 205.79]) states, whereas higher patient-family communication on EOL issues reduced likelihood for the emotional-only state (0.38 [0.21, 0.69]). Higher perceived social support reduced the likelihood of cognitive-only (0.94 [0.91, 0.98]) but increased the chance of emotional-only (1.09 [1.05, 1.14]) state membership. CONCLUSIONS: Death-preparedness states are associated with patients' socio-demographics, disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on EOL issues, and perceived social support. Providing accurate prognostic disclosure, adequately managing symptom distress, supporting those with higher functional dependence, promoting empathetic patient-family communication on EOL issues, and enhancing perceived social support may facilitate death preparedness.

Associations of prognostic-awareness-transition patterns with emotional distress and quality of life during terminally ill cancer patients' last 6 months of life.

OBJECTIVE: Unprecedently investigate associations of prognostic-awareness-transition patterns with (changes in) depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) during cancer patients' last 6 months. METHODS: In this secondary analysis study, 334 cancer patients in their last 6 months transitioned between four prognostic-awareness states (unknown and not wanting to know, unknown but wanting to know, inaccurate awareness, and accurate awareness), thus constituting three transition patterns: maintaining-accurate-, gaining-accurate-, and maintaining-inaccurate/unknown prognostic awareness. A multivariate hierarchical linear model evaluated associations of the transition patterns with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and QOL determined at final assessment and by mean difference between the first and last assessment. RESULTS: At the last assessment before death, the gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness group reported higher levels of depressive symptoms (estimate [95% confidence interval] = 1.59 [0.35-2.84]) and the maintaining- and gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness groups suffered more anxiety symptoms (1.50 [0.44-2.56]; 1.42 [0.13-2.71], respectively) and poorer QOL (-7.07 [-12.61 to 1.54]; -11.06 [-17.76 to -4.35], respectively) than the maintaining-inaccurate/unknown-prognostic-awareness group. Between the first and last assessment, the maintaining- and gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness groups' depressive symptoms (1.59 [0.33-2.85]; 3.30 [1.78-4.82], respectively) and QOL (-5.04 [-9.89 to -0.19]; -8.86 [-14.74 to -2.98], respectively) worsened more than the maintaining-inaccurate/unknown-prognostic-awareness group, and the gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness group's depressive symptoms increased more than the maintaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness group (1.71 [0.42-3.00]). CONCLUSIONS: Unexpectedly, patients who maintained/gained accurate prognostic awareness suffered more depression, anxiety, and poorer QOL at end of life. Promoting accurate prognostic awareness earlier in the terminal-cancer trajectory should be supplemented with adequate psychological care to alleviate patients' emotional distress and enhance QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01912846.

Prognostic awareness in Japanese patients with advanced cancer: a follow-up cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancer have been reported to be more likely to receive goal-concordant care if they have accurate prognostic awareness. However, many patients do not have this awareness. This study aimed to examine the prognostic awareness among Japanese patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This single-center, follow-up cohort study included Japanese patients with advanced cancer who received chemotherapy at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2015 and January 2016. Patients were surveyed at enrollment and followed up for clinical events for 5 years thereafter. We compared (i) the patients' prognostic awareness with both actual survival time and physician's prediction of survival and (ii) physician's prediction of survival time with actual survival. Factors associated with accurate prognostic awareness were identified by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients eligible for the study, 57 patients were analyzed. Only 10 (17.5%) patients had accurate prognostic awareness. Forty-three patients (75.4%) were optimistic about their prognosis; >80% of patients were more optimistic than their physicians about their prognosis. The physicians' predictions were accurate in for patients (37.5%). Accurate prognostic awareness was associated with physician's explanation of the prognosis and patients' perception of a good death. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of the patients with advanced cancer in this study had prognostic awareness that was more optimistic in comparison with their actual survival, and most were more optimistic than their physicians about their prognosis. Further research is needed to develop programs to facilitate the discussion of life expectancy with patients in a manner that is consistent with their preferences.

Perception of prognosis, quality of life, and distress in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell is potentially curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies but can cause life-threatening toxicities. Data on perceptions of prognosis and psychological distress are lacking. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of patients receiving CAR-T. Before hospitalization for CAR-T, patients completed assessments of quality of life (QOL) (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (Post-Traumatic Stress Checklist). Patients also completed the Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale (PAIS), which measures three domains: cognitive understanding of prognosis, emotional coping with prognosis, and adaptive response. RESULTS: A total of 71.8% (102 of 142) of eligible patients were enrolled. A total of 34% of patients reported that their oncologist said their cancer is curable and 64% reported there was >50% chance of cure. Overall, 26%, 30%, and 21% of patients reported clinically significant depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, respectively. We found no association between patients' cognitive understanding of prognosis and QOL or mood. Higher emotional coping with prognosis was associated with better QOL (Β = 0.72; SE = 0.10; p = <.001) and lower depression (Β = -0.17; SE = 0.02; p = <.001), anxiety (Β = -0.21; SE = 0.02; p = <.001), and PTSD (Β = -0.43; SE = 0.06; p = <.001) symptoms. Higher adaptive response was associated with better QOL (Β = 0.19; SE = 0.09; p = .028) and lower depression (Β = -0.05; SE = 0.02; p = .023), anxiety (Β = -0.09; SE = 0.02; p = <.001), and PTSD (Β = -0.19; SE = 0.05; p = <.001) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CAR-T report overly optimistic perception of their prognosis and have high rates of psychological distress. Higher emotional coping with prognosis and adaptive response were associated with better QOL and less psychological distress, underscoring the need to develop interventions to promote coping with this treatment. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy experience report overly optimistic perceptions of their prognosis and have high rates of psychological distress. Notably, higher emotional coping with prognosis and adaptive response were associated with better quality of life and less psychological distress.

Accuracy of curability expectations in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of illness and treatment understanding among cancer patients has largely focused on those with advanced disease. Less is known about patient expectations at earlier stages of cancer and potential modifiers of accurate understanding. METHODS: We assessed accuracy of cure expectations in patients across all stages with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Accuracy was determined by independent reviews of patient health records by oncologists on the investigative team. Impact on cure accuracy of selected clinical variables and health-information preferences was analyzed. RESULTS: Hundred and thirty five patients were included for analysis, with 100% interrater agreement for accuracy between oncologist reviewers. Sixety five patients (48%) had accurate cure expectations from their cancer treatment. Accuracy was lower in Stage IV versus Stage I-III disease (35% vs. 63%, p < 0.01), lower in unresectable versus resectable disease (35% vs. 67%, p < 0.01), and higher in patients with early-stage disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not (78% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Accuracy did not differ by health-information preferences and remained stable over time. Of 63 patients who died, baseline accuracy differed by location of death (p = 0.03), with greater accuracy in those who died with home hospice (56%). Accuracy was lower in those who were hospitalized in the last 30 days of life versus those who were not (25% vs. 59%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Inaccurate cure expectations are prevalent across all stages of GI cancers, but particularly among those with metastatic or unresectable disease. High-quality, iterative communication strategies may facilitate patient illness and treatment understanding throughout the disease course.

Death Anxiety and Correlates in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care.

Background: Death anxiety is powerful, potentially contributes to suffering, and yet has to date not been extensively studied in the context of palliative care. Availability of a validated Death Anxiety and Distress Scale (DADDS) opens the opportunity to better assess and redress death anxiety in serious illness. Objective: We explored death anxiety/distress for associations with physical and psychosocial factors. Design: Ancillary to a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of Dignity Therapy (DT), we enrolled a convenience sample of 167 older adults in the United States with cancer and receiving outpatient palliative care (mean age 65.9 [7.3] years, 62% female, 84% White, 62% stage 4 cancer). They completed the DADDS and several measures for the stepped-wedged RCT, including demographic factors, religious struggle, dignity-related distress, existential quality of life (QoL), and terminal illness awareness (TIA). Results: DADDS scores were generally unrelated to demographic factors (including religious affiliation, intrinsic religiousness, and frequency of prayer). DADDS scores were positively correlated with religious struggle (p < 0.001) and dignity-related distress (p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with existential QoL (p < 0.001). TIA was significantly nonlinearly associated with both the total DADDS (p = 0.007) and its Finitude subscale (p ≤ 0.001) scores. There was a statistically significant decrease in Finitude subscale scores for a subset of participants who completed a post-DT DADDS (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Findings, if replicable, suggest that further research on death anxiety and prognostic awareness in the context of palliative medicine is in order. Findings also raise questions about the optimal nature and timing of spiritual and psychosocial interventions, something that might entail evaluation or screening for death anxiety and prognostic awareness for maximizing the effectiveness of care.

Prognostication in brain tumors.

Despite the use of aggressive multimodality therapies, the prognosis of brain tumor patients remains poor. Tumors of glial origin typically have the worst prognosis, with a predicted median survival of 12-15months for glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) and 2-5years for anaplastic glioma (WHO grade III). Palliative care problems and needs in patients with primary and secondary brain tumors are significantly different, both due to different trajectory of disease and to variable prognosis which in metastatic brain tumors is related to the natural history of primary tumors. This chapter describes the complex interactions influencing communication and the treatment decision process in primary brain tumor patients. The whole trajectory of disease and particularly the end-of-life (EOL) phase of brain tumor (BT) patients are quite different in respect to the expected trajectory observed in the general cancer population. The need to improve the communication of prognosis in BT patients has been clearly reported in neuro-oncological literature, but several issues may hinder a good communication in these patients. Adequate prognostic awareness (PA) is important for several reasons: to respect patient autonomy, to obtain her/his preferences about treatments and goal of care, and to share EOL treatment decisions. The high incidence of cognitive deficits in BT patients is one of the most challenging issues influencing the quality of communication and the participation of patients in the process of treatment decisions. Impaired neurocognitive functions may impact capacities of understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of choice, reducing Medical Decisions Capacity (MDC). The lack of capacity to express preferences about EOL treatment decisions represents an important ethical issue, with a great impact on both the patient's family and healthcare professionals involved in the decision processes. Also, patients' coping styles may have an important influence in critical aspects of care such as communication of diagnosis and prognosis, discussion with patients and their caregivers about goal of treatments, early introduction of PC, and advanced planning of patients' preferences concerning EOL treatment and issues. Several barriers hinder good communication in BT patients. This chapter analyzes emerging literature data and possible strategies to improve communication about prognosis and goals of care and to promote patients' involvement in the treatment decision process particularly in the palliative care setting.

Associations of prognostic-awareness-transition patterns with end-of-life care in cancer patients' last month.

PURPOSE: Cancer patients heterogeneously develop prognostic awareness, and end-of-life cancer care has become increasingly aggressive to the detriment of patients and healthcare sustainability. We aimed to explore the never-before-examined associations of prognostic-awareness-transition patterns with end-of-life care. METHODS: Prognostic awareness was categorized into four states: (1) unknown and not wanting to know; (2) unknown but wanting to know; (3) inaccurate awareness; and (4) accurate awareness. We examined associations of our previously identified three prognostic-awareness-transition patterns during 334 cancer patients' last 6 months (maintaining accurate prognostic awareness, gaining accurate prognostic awareness, and maintaining inaccurate/unknown prognostic awareness) and end-of-life care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care unit care, mechanical ventilation, chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and hospice care) in cancer patients' last month by multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Cancer patients in the maintaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness and gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness groups had significantly lower odds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.22 [0.06-0.78]; and 0.10 [0.01-0.97], respectively) but higher odds of hospice care (3.44 [1.64-7.24]; and 3.28 [1.32-8.13], respectively) in the last month than those in the maintaining inaccurate/unknown prognostic awareness. The maintaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness group had marginally lower odds of chemotherapy or immunotherapy received than the gaining-accurate-prognostic-awareness group (0.58 [0.31-1.10], p = .096]). No differences in intensive care unit care and mechanical ventilation among cancer patients in different prognostic-awareness-transition patterns were observed. CONCLUSION: End-of-life care received in cancer patients' last month was associated with the three distinct prognostic-awareness-transition patterns. Cancer patients' accurate prognostic awareness should be facilitated earlier to reduce their risk of receiving aggressive end-of-life care, especially for avoiding chemotherapy/immunotherapy close to death. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01912846.

Association between prognostic awareness and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Despite the current guidelines supporting open communication about serious news, the evidence about the impact of prognostic awareness on the quality of life in cancer patients is not clear. The aim of this study was to assess the association between quality of life and prognostic awareness in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study which involved patients (n = 129) with incurable advanced cancer (estimated by oncologist using 12-month surprise question). Data were collected at oncology departments at 3 hospitals using structured interview in which patients were asked about their quality of life (using Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-IPOS and a single-item global measure), prognostic awareness, information needs and demographics. RESULTS: Only 16% of the sample was completely aware of prognosis and 57% was partially aware. Accurate prognostic awareness was significantly associated (p = 0.02) with lower level of quality of life between (when measured by both the IPOS and the single-item scale) patients with accurate prognostic awareness (M = 37.1; 10.4) and partially aware (M = 31.9; 9.1) and unaware patients (M = 30; 7.4). Detailed analysis showed that significant difference between groups was found only for physical symptoms subscales (p = 0.002), not for emotional and communication subscales. CONCLUSION: Prognostic awareness was found to be negatively associated with physical domain of quality of life, but not with emotional and communication domains. More research is needed on personality factors that might influence the development of prognostic awareness and quality of life.

Advanced Cancer Patients' Prognostic Awareness and Its Association With Anxiety, Depression and Spiritual Well-Being: A Multi-Country Study in Asia.

AIMS: The associations between prognostic awareness, acceptance of illness and psychological outcomes (anxiety, depression and spiritual well-being) remain unclear. This study examined the associations between prognostic awareness and various psychological outcomes and how they can be moderated by patient acceptance of illness (cancer). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1184 patients with stage IV solid cancer were recruited at major public hospitals across four Asian countries (China, India, Sri Lanka, Vietnam). Prognostic awareness and acceptance of illness were assessed through self-reported understanding of treatment intent and acceptance of illness, respectively. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, whereas spiritual well-being was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Multivariate regressions were used to estimate the associations while controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with being unaware of their prognosis (i.e. believing that their cancer is curable), being aware or unsure of their prognosis was associated with higher anxiety and depressive symptoms, and lower spiritual well-being scores. Acceptance of illness moderated these relationships and improved the psychological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that disclosure of prognostic information should be provided in conjunction with psychological interventions that focus on acceptance of illness.