Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Schizophr Res ; 270: 358-365, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) and auditory hallucinations (AHs) display a distorted sense of self and self-other boundaries. Alterations of activity in midline cortical structures such as the prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during self-reference as well as in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) have been proposed as neuromarkers of SZ and AHs. METHODS: In this randomized, participant-blinded, sham-controlled trial, 22 adults (18 males) with SZ spectrum disorders (SZ or schizoaffective disorder) and frequent medication-resistant AHs received one session of real-time fMRI neurofeedback (NFB) either from the STG (n = 11; experimental group) or motor cortex (n = 11; control group). During NFB, participants were instructed to upregulate their STG activity by attending to pre-recorded sentences spoken in their own voice and downregulate it by ignoring unfamiliar voices. Before and after NFB, participants completed a self-reference task where they evaluated if trait adjectives referred to themselves (self condition), Abraham Lincoln (other condition), or whether adjectives had a positive valence (semantic condition). FMRI activation analyses of self-reference task data tested between-group changes after NFB (self>semantic, post>pre-NFB, experimental>control). Analyses were pre-masked within a self-reference network. RESULTS: Activation analyses revealed significantly (p < 0.001) greater activation increase in the experimental, compared to the control group, after NFB within anterior regions of the self-reference network (mPFC, ACC, superior frontal cortex). CONCLUSIONS: STG-NFB was associated with activity increase in the mPFC, ACC, and superior frontal cortex during self-reference. Modulating the STG is associated with activation changes in other, not-directly targeted, regions subserving higher-level cognitive processes associated with self-referential processes and AHs psychopathology in SZ. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: Rt-fMRI Neurofeedback and AH in Schizophrenia; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03504579.


Asunto(s)
Alucinaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neurorretroalimentación , Esquizofrenia , Lóbulo Temporal , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatología , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Proyectos Piloto , Neurorretroalimentación/métodos , Alucinaciones/fisiopatología , Alucinaciones/diagnóstico por imagen , Alucinaciones/terapia , Alucinaciones/etiología , Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico por imagen , Método Simple Ciego , Trastornos Psicóticos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoimagen , Adulto Joven
2.
medRxiv ; 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766116

RESUMEN

Background: Brooding is a critical symptom and prognostic factor of major depressive disorder (MDD), which involves passively dwelling on self-referential dysphoria and related abstractions. The neurobiology of brooding remains under characterized. We aimed to elucidate neural dynamics underlying brooding, and explore their responses to neurofeedback intervention in MDD. Methods: We investigated functional MRI (fMRI) dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) in 36 MDD subjects and 26 healthy controls (HCs) during rest and brooding. Rest was measured before and after fMRI neurofeedback (MDD-active/sham: n=18/18, HC-active/sham: n=13/13). Baseline brooding severity was recorded using Ruminative Response Scale - Brooding subscale (RRS-B). Results: Four recurrent dFNC states were identified. Measures of time spent were not significantly different between MDD and HC for any of these states during brooding or rest. RRS-B scores in MDD showed significant negative correlation with measures of time spent in dFNC state 3 during brooding (r=-0.5, p= 1.7E-3, FDR-significant). This state comprises strong connections spanning several brain systems involved in sensory, attentional and cognitive processing. Time spent in this anti-brooding dFNC state significantly increased following neurofeedback only in the MDD active group (z=-2.09, p=0.037). Limitations: The sample size was small and imbalanced between groups. Brooding condition was not examined post-neurofeedback. Conclusion: We identified a densely connected anti-brooding dFNC brain state in MDD. MDD subjects spent significantly longer time in this state after active neurofeedback intervention, highlighting neurofeedback's potential for modulating dysfunctional brain dynamics to treat MDD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA