Coronary Sinus Reducer Therapy for Refractory Angina and its Role in Modern Interventional Practice: A Contemporary Review.

Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation is an emerging treatment option for patients with refractory angina. This condition represents a major global cardiovascular healthcare challenge, with patients experiencing chronic anginal symptoms that significantly impair their quality of life and for whom few effective treatments exist. The clinical burden of refractory angina is only set to grow because of improved survival from coronary artery disease, increased life expectancy and the presence of residual angina after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation. Therefore, new, effective, evidence-based therapies are urgently needed. In this review, we highlight the unmet clinical needs of patients with refractory angina, discuss the development of the CSR device and review the preclinical and clinical evidence base underlying CSR implantation. In addition, we discuss the current role of CSR implantation in contemporary interventional practice, highlighting knowledge gaps and discussing areas of on-going research.

[Coronary sinus reducer : Technical aspects, prevention and management of potential complications]. / Réducteur de sinus coronaire : aspects techniques, prévention et gestion des complications.

Coronary sinus reducer implantation is a percutaneous technique creating a narrowing in the coronary sinus through the implantation of an hourglass-shaped endoprosthesis. It is proposed to reduce symptoms in patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. This innovative treatment is experiencing a major craze among interventional cardiologists. It is associated with very high procedural success rates. Complications are rare and include coronary sinus dissection or perforation and migration of the device. This review exposes the device implantation technique, the potential anatomical difficulties, the tips and tricks to overcome challenging situations. It also focuses on the prevention and management of potential complications.

Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer in the Therapy of Refractory Angina Pectoris-Mid-Term Results of the Real-Life Cohort.

Background: Despite continuous improvements in revascularization techniques, refractory angina without potential revascularization options remains a relevant clinical issue with significant impact on the patient's quality of life. Recently, a novel device, the Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR), has been introduced into clinical practice as a therapeutic option for patients with disabling angina pectoris. In this single-center, observational study, we evaluated the mid-term (3-month) safety and efficacy of the CSR in a real-world cohort. Methods: The study population consisted of 55 patients with refractory angina without potential revascularization options, who were predominantly men (87.3%) with a high cardiovascular risk factor burden and advanced angina (baseline CCS angina class 3.15 ± 0.6). In terms of procedure safety, all patients underwent successful device deployment with only one periprocedural complication. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, we observed a statistically significant improvement in angina control measured CCS class and SAQ-7 total questionnaire along with increased abolition of physical limitation-6-MWT (233.3 ± 107.1 vs. 305.2 ± 126.8; p < 0.0001). Additionally, we observed significant improvement in terms of quality of life measurements SF-36, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and the EQ-VAS. Conclusions: Our real-world data suggest that CSR implantation is a relatively safe procedure and appears to be particularly effective in relieving angina symptoms and improving quality of life in subjects with refractory angina.

The Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Reducer in Patients with Refractory Angina: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Refractory angina is a frequently encountered phenomenon in patients with coronary artery disease, often presenting therapeutic challenges to the clinical cardiologist. Novel treatment methods have been explored in this direction, with the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) being among the most extensively-investigated. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature for studies assessing the efficacy of CSR in patients with refractory angina. The primary endpoints of interest were procedural success and the improvement in angina according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) by at least one class. Secondary endpoints were the rate of periprocedural adverse events, the improvement by at least 2 CCS classes, and the mean change in CCS class. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions (procedural success, improvement by ≥ 1 or ≥ 2 classes, periprocedural adverse events) or means (mean CCS class change) were performed. I 2 was chosen as the metric for between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by the inspection of funnel plots and Egger's regression test. We examined the risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: From a total of 515 studies identified from the original search, 12 studies were finally included for data extraction. Based on their meta-analysis, we observed a high CSR procedural success (98%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 96 to 99%) with a low rate of periprocedural complications (6%, 95% CI 5 to 7%), while most patients exhibited an improvement by at least 1 CCS class (75%, 95% CI 66 to 83%) after the intervention. A significant proportion of patients demonstrated an improvement by at least 2 CCS classes (39%, 95% CI 34 to 45%), with a mean change of -1.24 CCS class (95% CI -1.40 to -1.08). Conclusions: CSR is associated with high implantation success rates and significant improvements in angina symptoms for patients with refractory angina.

A budget impact model and a cost-utility analysis of reducer device (Neovasc) in patients with refractory angina.

Background: Refractory angina (RA) is a chronic condition characterized by the presence of debilitating angina symptoms due to established reversible ischemia in the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatments for this condition have undergone major developments in recent decades; however, the treatment for RA remains a challenge for medicine. In this sense, the Coronary Sinus Reducer System (CSRS) stands as the last line of therapy for ineligible patients for revascularization with reversible ischemia. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the potential burden on the National Health Service (NHS) and measure the health effects in terms of both quantity (life years) and quality-of-life aspects related to the reducer. Methods: Two different economic evaluation models were developed as part of the analysis. The budget impact was developed to estimate the potential burden on the NHS from incremental uptake of the use of the reducer in the target population. The utility cost analysis compares and evaluates the quality of life and health resource use and costs between the two alternatives, based on the research of Gallone et al. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out to characterize the uncertainty around the parameters of the model. Results: In the budget impact analysis (BIA), the reducer is shown to be more expensive in the first 2 years of the model, due to the gradual uptake in the market and the cost of the device. Starting from the third year, assuming maintenance of effectiveness, there are savings in terms of resource absorption in direct healthcare costs arising from hospitalizations, emergency department accesses, coronarography, and visits avoided. Conclusion: The BIA and cost-effectiveness model show that the reducer device, despite an increase in resources absorbed in the first years of implementation and use, has the potential to result in increased quality of life in patients with RA. These costs are largely offset in the short term by the improved clinical outcomes achievable leading to savings from the third year onward in the BIA and a dominance ratio in the cost-utility analysis.

A Case of Refractory Variant Angina.

Coronary vasospasm is defined as the abnormal contraction of an epicardial coronary artery. Variant angina is a severe form of coronary vasospasm, reflecting transmural ischemia with ST-T elevation on an electrocardiogram. A pharmacologic spasm provocation test during coronary angiography is the gold standard evaluation for patients who have not been diagnosed with coronary vasospasm by a non-invasive test. The sensitivity and specificity of pharmacologic spasm provocation testing have been reported to be very high in patients with variant angina. Here, we report the case of a 61-year-old woman who had refractory variant angina. Although a pharmacologic spasm provocation test did not lead to a definitive diagnosis, she had recurrent acute coronary syndrome due to coronary vasospasm. Physicians should be aware of the limitations of the spasm provocation test, even in patients with refractory variant angina.

Snare technique failure in extracting an embolized coronary sinus reducer to the pulmonary artery.

We report the case of a 79-year-old male patient who benefited from the implantation of a coronary sinus reducer (CSR) (Reducer; Neovasc, Inc.) in the management of typical angina with mild exertion with optimal medical treatment.

Ischemic Myocardial Positron Emission Tomography Perfusion Without Epicardial Coronary Disease in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

The presence of impaired microvascular coronary flow (MCF) identified by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (PET-MPI) has been described in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients, contributes to blunted myocardial perfusion during vasodilator stress, and is a strong predictor of poor prognosis. A 45-year-old female with hypertension and obesity presented with angina. Her PET-MPI displayed vasodilator stress-induced global LV ischemia. However, her coronary angiogram revealed no obstructive coronary disease. These contradictory findings triggered a more thorough cardiac MRI with diffuse myocardial fibrosis, indicating high-risk HOCM. She underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement due to non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and syncope. While this patient lacked epicardial coronary disease, her PET-MPI demonstrated global LV ischemia due to decreased MCF, leading to inadequate augmentation of myocardial perfusion during hyperemia. This is a well-described phenomenon responsible for anginal symptoms in HOCM patients. HOCM hearts have abnormally thick coronary arterioles and decreased capillary density, leading to increased oxygen diffusion distances and reduced perfusion. The presence of vasodilator-induced, global ischemia on PET-MPI without epicardial stenosis should raise suspicion for HOCM with impaired MCF, which represents a high-risk population with an almost 10 times greater risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with preserved MCF.

Pathogenesis and Traditional Chinese Medicine Prevention and Treatment Strategy of Refractory Angina Based on Theory of Stasis and Toxin / 中国实验方剂学杂志

Refractory angina is characterized by recurrent and persistent angina with a duration of not less than three months， which is related to reversible ischemia and hypoxia caused by coronary stenosis and obstruction. It mainly involves obstructive coronary artery disease and non-obstructive coronary artery disease with coronary artery spasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction. “Stasis and toxin” play an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. The pathogenesis of stasis and toxin is stubborn filthy turbidity featured by slow accumulation and sudden onset，and rapid changes，which coincides with the characteristics of refractory angina which is complex and changeable，prolonged and difficult to cure. The pathogenesis of refractory angina involves a combination of underlying deficiency and excessive manifestation， with "stasis and toxin" playing a crucial role as an important pathological factor in the whole process of refractory angina. Traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） employs a holistic approach known as "activating blood circulation and removing toxins"， which is supplemented by various methods to tonify Qi and warm Yang， nourish the kidneys and invigorate the spleen， clear heat and transform phlegm. This approach applies anti-inflammatory measures， regulates lipid metabolism， inhibits oxidative stress and thrombus formation， protects endothelial function in blood vessels， as well as establishes collateral circulation for the prevention and treatment of refractory angina. Therefore，based on the theory of "stasis and toxin"，combined with TCM theory and modern medical research，this paper discusses the pathogenesis of refractory angina and the prevention and treatment strategy of TCM，and elucidates the reasons for the difficulty in curing refractory angina and the relationship between refractory angina and common angina pectoris，coronary microvascular dysfunction，coronary artery spasm and obstructive coronary artery disease，hoping to provide certain theoretical basis and clinical ideas for the prevention and treatment of refractory angina with TCM.

[Coronary sinus reducer : Literature review and issues surrounding the France Reducer registry]. / Réducteur de sinus coronaire : revue de littérature et enjeux autour du registre France Reducer.

Coronary sinus Reducer implantation is a percutaneous technique used to treat patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. The device narrows the coronary sinus, increases the back pressure in the myocardial venous system and forces redistribution of coronary blood flow from less ischemic subepicardium to the more ischemic subendocardium. Multiple clinical studies had proven its efficacy to alleviate myocardial ischemia and related symptoms, and to improve the quality of life of patients with refractory symptomatic chronic coronary artery disease for whom coronary revascularization is deemed unsuitable. This literature review aims to expose the device design, its mechanisms of action, and the clinical data supporting its use. Since November 2021 Reducer's reimbursement has been granted in France by the national health authority. It is the first device to be approved under a newly established reimbursement approval process. A transitional coverage is provided with opportunities for renewal before applying for full-time reimbursement. To fulfill the requirements of the National Commission for Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies, the French Society of Cardiology has been creating the France Reducer registry. This clinical registry has been collecting data from patients undergoing coronary sinus Reducer implantation regarding their clinical situation, periprocedural information, and one-year follow-up. It is crucial for the future of this emerging therapeutic option in France. To date, 215 patients from 28 centers have been included between June 2022 and September 2023.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a coronary sinus reducer: a case series.

Background: Reducing venous drainage of the coronary sinus is a promising intervention for refractory angina. Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) System™ effectively treats patients with refractory angina, possibly by increasing coronary collateral circulation, and leads to an improvement in their symptoms and quality of life. In patients with impaired left ventricular function and electrocardiographic dyssynchrony, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment. However, there is only one published case report of CRT in a patient implanted with a CSR system. We present the first case series of CRT in patients implanted with the CSR system. Case summary: This case series describes three patients. The first case demonstrated that CRT is feasible in patients implanted with a CSR system. The second case is the first report of a left ventricular lead extraction after CSR, and the third case was complicated due to the patient's medical history; however, CSR system implantation was feasible without major complications. Discussion: Our results suggest that CRT is feasible in patients implanted with a CSR system, and lead extraction after CSR system implantation is possible. However, lead extraction in cases of severe adhesions around the CSR system and the coronary sinus may be associated with a high risk of complications; alternative options should be discussed at an early stage.

Refractory angina pectoris: a 20-year (2003-2022) bibliometric analysis.

Background: The increasing number of patients with refractory angina pectoris, combined with the aging population and improved survival rates among coronary heart disease patients, presents a significant challenge in contemporary cardiovascular medicine. The treatment of refractory angina has been an ongoing area of exploration, yet a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on this topic is currently lacking. Therefore, this study aims to provide the first bibliometric analysis of publications related to refractory angina. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science database to identify articles related to refractory angina published between 2003 and 2022. The inclusion criteria were limited to articles and reviews written in English. CiteSpace software was utilized to conduct a collaborative network analysis of countries/regions, institutions and authors, co-occurrence analysis of keywords, and co-citation analysis of authors and references. Results: A total of 1,386 publications were identified, with an annual publication volume exhibiting fluctuation over time. American and European countries and institutions demonstrated a leading position in terms of research output. Henry TD emerged as the most prolific researcher in the field, while Mannheimer C received the highest number of citations. The primary research hotspot within this field focused on the treatment of refractory angina, with recent emphasis on emerging treatments such as stem cell therapy and the coronary sinus reducer. A significant number of clinical trials have been conducted, with a continuous focus on patient benefits, quality of life, and survival prognosis. Conclusion: Significant progress has been made in the field of refractory angina pectoris in recent years. Novel treatment methods, including spinal cord stimulation, enhanced external counterpulsation, stem cell therapy, and the coronary sinus reducer, hold promising therapeutic prospects. However, further high-quality evidence-based research is essential to support these emerging interventions. Additionally, the development of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for refractory angina treatment is crucial. Such guidelines would provide clinicians with a framework to navigate the complexities of treatment choices and optimize patient care in this challenging condition.

Exercise Training on Anginal Threshold Does Not Improve Endothelial Function in Refractory Angina Patients.

Refractory angina (RA) is a chronic condition of coronary artery disease (CAD). Endothelial function (EF) measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is an important prognostic marker in CAD. Exercise training is a stimulus that improves EF in CAD. However, exercise training effects on EF in RA are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to verify the effects of exercise training on EF in RA. This was a longitudinal, non-randomized clinical study, involving patients with patients limited by angina, aged 45 to 75 years. Patients were prospectively allocated by convenience to either exercise trained (ET) or control group (C). Laboratory analysis, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and FMD were implemented at inclusion and after 12 weeks of exercise training or clinical treatment period. Exercise training included 60 minutes per session, 3 times a week, including 40 minutes of aerobic exercise on anginal threshold heart rate obtained on the CPET, 15 minutes of resistance training, and 5 minutes of stretching. A total of 38 patients were included (mean age 60 ± 9 years, 22 men); 21 were allocated to the ET and 17 to the C group. Baseline measures showed no differences between groups. After 12 weeks glycated hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure were lower in ET before than ET after (p = 0.004, and p = 0.05, respectively), and exercise time of the CPET was lower in ET before than ET after (p = 0.002). Exercise training did not change FMD. In conclusion, exercise training performed on anginal threshold increases exercise tolerance but causes no changes in EF in patients with RA.

Baseline Left Ventricle Longitudinal Strain as a Predictor for Clinical Improvement Following Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation.

Coronary sinus narrowing device (reducer) implantation has emerged as an effective treatment to improve the quality of life and functional capacity in patients suffering from disabling refractory angina. Left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) is a useful tool for early diagnosis of subclinical cardiac injury and an independent predictor for coronary artery disease. We aimed to investigate whether LV-GLS could help predict clinical improvement after coronary sinus reducer implantation. LV-GLS assessments were performed at baseline and 6 months after reducer implantation in consecutive patients treated for refractory angina. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on reduced (<17% absolute value) or preserved baseline LV-GLS. Clinical improvement was defined as an increase of ≥25 m in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at follow-up. Overall, 41 patients were included, 31 in the reduced LV-GLS group and 10 in the preserved LV-GLS group. The mean age was 68 ± 8 years, with only 2 female patients (5%). Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Univariable analysis revealed that LV-GLS was the only significant predictor for 6MWT improvement. Baseline preserved LV-GLS reduced the likelihood of 6MWT improvement by 82% (odds ratio 0.18 [0.04 to 0.83], p = 0.029). A significant increase in 6MWT (307 ± 97 m to 343 ± 92 m, p = 0.017) was observed in the reduced LV-GLS group, compared with a decrease in the preserved LV-GLS group (378 ± 86 m to 361 ± 123 m, p = 0.651). In conclusion, reduced LV-GLS may serve as a marker for potential clinical improvement in patients with refractory angina treated with reducer. Larger clinical trials are needed to establish its role.

Drug repurposing-a promising approach for patients with angina but non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA).

In today's era of individualized precision medicine drug repurposing represents a promising approach to offer patients fast access to novel treatments. Apart from drug repurposing in cancer treatments, cardiovascular pharmacology is another attractive field for this approach. Patients with angina pectoris without obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) report refractory angina despite standard medications in up to 40% of cases. Drug repurposing also appears to be an auspicious option for this indication. From a pathophysiological point of view ANOCA patients frequently suffer from vasomotor disorders such as coronary spasm and/or impaired microvascular vasodilatation. Consequently, we carefully screened the literature and identified two potential therapeutic targets: the blockade of the endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor and the stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). Genetically increased endothelin expression results in elevated levels of ET-1, justifying ET-1 receptor blockers as drug candidates to treat coronary spasm. sGC stimulators may be beneficial as they stimulate the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway leading to GMP-mediated vasodilatation.

Effect of Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation on Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Refractory Angina Patients-A CROSSROAD Study.

Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation is a new treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris. However, there is no evidence from a randomized trial that would show an improvement in exercise capacity after this treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of CSR treatment on maximal oxygen consumption and compare it to a sham procedure. Twenty-five patients with refractory angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II-IV) were randomized to a CSR implantation (n = 13) or a sham procedure (n = 12). At baseline and after 6 months of follow-up, the patients underwent symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing with an adjusted ramp protocol and assessment of angina pectoris using the CCS scale and Seattle angina pectoris questionnaire (SAQ). In the CSR group, maximal oxygen consumption increased from 15.56 ± 4.05 to 18.4 ± 5.2 mL/kg/min (p = 0.03) but did not change in the sham group (p = 0.53); p for intergroup comparison was 0.03. In contrast, there was no difference in the improvement of the CCS class or SAQ domains. To conclude, in patients with refractory angina and optimized medical therapy, CSR implantation may improve oxygen consumption beyond that of optimal medical therapy.

Novel Concepts in the Management of Angina in Coronary Artery Disease.

Coronary artery disease remains a condition with high prevalence and detrimental effects on the quality of life of affected individuals. Its most frequent manifestation, stable angina pectoris, may be challenging to manage despite the available antianginal pharmacotherapy and adequate risk factor control, especially in subjects not amenable to revascularization. In the direction of refractory angina pectoris, several approaches have been developed over the years with varying degrees of success. Among the most recognized techniques in managing angina is enhanced external counterpulsation, which utilizes mechanical compression of the lower extremities to increase blood flow to the heart. Moving to coronary sinus reduction, it leads to an increase in coronary sinus backward pressure, ultimately augmenting myocardial blood flow redistribution to ischemic regions and ameliorating chronic angina. Clinical trial results of the above-mentioned techniques have been encouraging but are based on small sample sizes to justify their widespread application. Other interventional approaches, such as transmyocardial laser revascularization, extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization, and spinal cord stimulation, have been met with either controversial or negative results, and their use is not recommended. Lastly, angiogenic therapy with targeted intramyocardial vascular endothelial growth factor injection or CD34+ cell therapy may be beneficial and warrants further investigation. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge in the field of angina management, highlighting the potential and the gaps in the existing evidence that ought to be addressed in future larger-scale, randomized studies before these techniques can be safely adapted in the clinical practice of patients with refractory angina pectoris.

Prognostic significance of small vessel coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions.

Introduction: Small vessel disease (SVD) usually refers to atherosclerosis within vessels of diameter of < 2.5 mm. Conflicting data exist regarding the outcomes of its revascularization. Aim: To evaluate the outcome of invasive treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and SVD and the predictors of angina recurrence after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Material and methods: This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. It covered consecutive 127 patients (26.77% women; median age: 69.74 ±8.97 years) with ACS who underwent PCI in the Upper-Silesian Medical Center in Katowice between 2018 and 2020. The study population was stratified by means of presence of SVD defined by PCI of the culprit artery with a diameter of ≤ 2.5 mm. The major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and angina recurrence were analyzed in a 12-month follow-up period. Results: Overall 99 (77.95%) patients were diagnosed with small-vessel coronary artery disease. MACCE were documented in 14 (11.02%) patients. Univariate analysis revealed the following factors associated with MACCE: left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR = 0.95, p = 0.0212), left main (LM) stenting (OR = 18.17, p = 0.0216), number of former PCIs (OR = 1.48, p = 0.0235). According to logistic regression analysis the factors were LM stenting (OR = 20.04, p = 0.0216) and number of former PCIs (OR = 1.53, p = 0.0203). Patients with SVD had more often refractory or recurrent angina in symptomatic class III/IV on follow-up (52.53% vs. 10.71%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Outcome of invasive treatment in patients with ACS is related to LM stenting and former PCIs but not to SVD occurrence. Patients with SVD have a high rate of recurrent/refractory angina despite successful PCI in this clinical setting.