Above-Knee Amputation Following Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) that arises following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can usually be resolved through surgical and antimicrobial therapy. However, in approximately 5% of cases, an infection that is chronic and persistent will require treatment by above-knee amputation (AKA). This study seeks to provide an enhanced understanding of patient functionality and satisfaction following this devastating complication of one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the world. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent an AKA as a result of PJI following TKA at our center between January 2000 and November 2023 was performed. Patients completed a post-TKA AKA functionality and satisfaction questionnaire, as well as the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). Of 27 eligible patients, 14 were contacted by phone for follow-up, 6 were deceased, 6 could not be reached, and 1 declined participation. The mean age at AKA was 62 years old (range, 43 to 85). Patients had an average of 5.5 procedures (range, 3 to 8) between primary TKA and AKA. The average follow-up time post-AKA was 38.5 months (range, 12 to 102). RESULTS: Of the patients, 85.7% were satisfied with their AKA, 85.7% would choose AKA again, and 71.4% would have proceeded with AKA earlier in retrospect. Average SF-12 physical and mental component scores were 37.1 and 50.6, respectively. DISCUSSION: Despite important limitations in functional and ambulatory status, the vast majority of patients who underwent an AKA following an infected TKA are satisfied with their amputation and would choose this treatment modality again if necessary, with many indicating they would do so at an earlier time point. In light of these results, the option of amputation should, when medically indicated, be discussed in a sensitive, but timely manner with patients undergoing treatment for recalcitrant PJI.

Fellowship-Trained Surgeons Experience a Learning Curve Performing Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasties require considerable surgical proficiency, but are frequently delegated to the least experienced surgeons. This study examined the influence of surgeon experience on revision outcomes. METHODS: Prospective data on confirmed aseptic rTHAs (n=122) and rTKAs (n=195) performed by four fellowship-trained surgeons in the same practice were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were grouped based on years in practice (inexperienced [IE] first two years, early experience [EE) 4 to 6 years, senior experience [SE] 15 to 17 years). Procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and reoperation rates were compared, controlling for potential covariates. RESULTS: Procedure durations varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTHA diagnoses (P≤0.001). Relative to the SE surgeon, procedure duration was 80.0 (95% CI [confidence interval] 61.7 to 98.4, P<0.001) minutes longer for IE surgeons and 30.9 (95% CI 17.5 to 44.3, P < 0.001) minutes longer for the EE surgeon. Procedure durations also varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTKA diagnoses (P<0.001), with the longest durations for IE surgeons. Procedure durations varied based on the interaction of surgeon experience, patient age, and body mass index (BMI). The EBL did not differ in rTHA based on surgeon experience (P=0.978), but did differ for rTKA (P=0.004). There were 25% of rTHAs performed by IE surgeons compared to 15.5% for the EE surgeon and 3.6% for the SE surgeon that underwent reoperation within a year of the index procedure (P=0.064), with significantly more reoperations for the same indication among IE and EE surgeons (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Complex procedures completed by less experienced surgeons may result in longer procedures, higher EBL, and more early reoperations. Study findings implicate a learning curve for revision arthroplasty that continues for several years, warranting consideration of existing patient allocation and referral patterns.

Catastrophic Femoral Component Failure of a Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

We report a case of previously undescribed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure due to femoral component implant fracture. The patient experienced sudden pain and locking while ambulating 8 years postoperatively. Radiographs revealed catastrophic femoral component failure with a transverse break through the metal. The patient underwent revision to total knee arthroplasty. At 1-year follow-up, the patient had no pain and a range of motion of 130 degrees. Particular attention should be paid to obtaining adequate femoral component posterior flange fixation during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patient education regarding maintaining a healthy weight is crucial to preventing this complication.

Promising short-term outcomes of free-hand burring technique to implant second-generation metaphyseal cone in Asian knees - a case series.

BACKGROUND: The second-generation metaphyseal cone was useful in managing bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. However, due to the anatomical constraints in Asian osteometry, the authors utilized a novel free-hand burring technique instead of cannulated reaming for bone preparation. We reported the short-term outcomes of our surgical techniques specific to Asian osteometry. METHODS: We conducted a case series by consecutively recruiting 13 female and 12 male patients (involving 25 knees), with a mean age of 71 years (range, 54-88 years). The patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty during the period from April 2017 to June 2022. Twenty-three tibial cones and 4 femoral cones using free-hand burring technique were implanted. The mean follow-up duration was 51 months (range 18-80 months). Due to the relatively small bone size and meta-diaphyseal center mismatch in the Asian knees, the free-hand burring technique instead of the cannulated reaming technique was adopted in preparing for cone implantation. The clinical outcomes were knee ranges of motion, the Knee Society Knee scores (KSS), end-of-stem pain, infection, and the need for revision surgery. The radiological outcomes included osteointegration, fracture, and loosening. RESULTS: Mean knee range of motion improved from 83 degrees (range 0°-120°) preoperatively to 106 degrees (range 60°-125°) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean KSS improved significantly from 29 (range 0-70) to 69 (range 5-100) (P < 0.001). All cones were osteointegrated. One case had transient end-of-stem pain, two developed intraoperative minor femoral fractures and one suffered from recurrent infection that did not require cone revision. Cone revision-free survivorship was 100%. There was no aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation cone implanted with free-hand burring bone preparation yielded promising short-term outcomes in Asian knees.

Visible fluid motion on manipulation as the new threshold for intraoperatively determined knee arthroplasty component loosening: A Delphi study.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of a clear, uniform definition for intraoperatively assessed component loosening of a knee arthroplasty component, complicating the interpretation and interchangeability of results of diagnostic studies using an intraoperative observation as the reference test. The purpose of this study was to establish a consensus among specialised knee revision surgeons regarding the definition of intraoperatively determined loosening of total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty components. METHODS: Utilising the Delphi consensus method, an international panel of highly specialised knee revision surgeons was invited to participate in a three-round process. The initiation of the first round involved the exploration of possible criteria for intraoperatively determined loosening with open questions. The second round focused on rating these criteria importance on a five-point Likert scale. For the third round, criteria that reached consensus were summarised in consecutive definitions for intraoperatively determined loosening and proposed to the panel. Consensus was established when over 70% of participants agreed with a definition for intraoperatively determined loosening. RESULTS: The 34 responding panel members described in total 60 different criteria in the first round of which 34 criteria received consensus in the second round. Summarising these criteria resulted in four different definitions as minimal requirements for intraoperatively determined loosening. Eighty-eight percent of the panel members agreed on defining a component as loose if there is visible fluid motion at the interface observed during specific movements or when gently applying direct force. CONCLUSION: This study successfully established a consensus using a Delphi method among knee revision surgeons on the definition of intraoperatively determined component loosening. By agreeing on the visibility of fluid motion as new definition, this study provides a standardised reference for future diagnostic research. This definition will enhance the interpretability and interchangeability of future diagnostic studies evaluating knee arthroplasty component loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

A Rare Case of Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but most vital complication after joint arthroplasty and requires a revision surgery. Synovial fluid analysis is essential in diagnosis of the PJI, and conventional and molecular microbiologic investigations may help in determining the cause of the infection. With this unusual case, we aimed to present the second instance in the literature of PJI of the knee caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae (SDSD). S. dysgalactiae PJI in the literature are commonly Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (SDSE), and SDSD mostly infects animals. A farmer with comorbid illnesses who works with cattle and sheep experienced periprosthetic knee joint infection caused by SDSD. Surgical excisional debridement with open washing, decompression, and liner exchange were performed. The identification of the bacteria was done with VITEK MS as SDSD. After 1-year follow-up, the patient has fully recovered without recurrence.

Decreased Patellar Fractures and Subluxation With Patellar Component Replacement at Stage-One Spacer.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty and is often treated with 2-stage revision. We retrospectively assessed whether replacing the patellar component with articulating stage-one spacers was associated with improved outcomes compared to spacers without patellar component replacement. METHODS: A total of 139 patients from a single academic institution were identified who underwent an articulating stage-one revision total knee arthroplasty and had at least 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 91 underwent patellar component removal without replacement, while 48 had a patellar component replaced at stage-one revision. Patellar fracture and reinfection at any point after stage-one were recorded. Knee range of motion (ROM), patellar thickness, lateral tilt, and lateral displacement were measured at 6-weeks post stage-one. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were utilized for comparisons. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. RESULTS: Patellar component replacement at stage-one revision was associated with fewer patellar fractures (2.1 versus 12.1%, P = .046), less lateral patellar displacement (1.7 versus 16.0 mm, P < .01), and improved pre to postoperative knee ROM 6 weeks after stage-one (+5.9 versus -11.4°, P = .03). There was no difference in reinfections after stage-2 revision for the replaced or unreplaced patellar groups (15.4 versus 15%, P = 1.000). While the mean time between stage-one and stage-2 was not different (5.2 versus 4.5 months, P = .50), at one-year follow-up, significantly more patients in the patellar component replacement group were satisfied and refused stage-2 revision (45.8 versus 3.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing the patellar component at stage-one revision is associated with a decreased rate of patellar fracture and lateral patellar subluxation, improved ROM, and possible increased patient satisfaction, as reflected by nearly half of these patients electing to keep their spacer. There was no difference in reinfection rates between the cohorts.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51). RESULTS: The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted.

Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although hinged prostheses have been used successfully in complex revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), concerns exist regarding early failure due to aseptic loosening and other mechanical complications. The use of metaphyseal cones and hybrid cement fixation have been studied in unlinked constrained primary or revision TKA, but their impact on the survivorship of hinged prostheses has yet to be investigated. METHODS: We identified a consecutive series of 164 hinged prostheses and collected data on demographics, indications, complications, and re-revisions in patients who had fully cemented versus hybrid stems, with and without metaphyseal cones. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent variables associated with re-revision as the primary end point. RESULTS: In total, 84 patients (51.2%) had fully cemented stems, and 80 patients (48.8%) had hybrid stems. Cones were used in 73 patients (44.5%). At a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.2 years, 42 patients underwent re-revision (25.8%), most commonly for infection (12.2%), followed by loosening (6.7%) and periprosthetic fracture (3.7%). Patients who had fully cemented stems had lower re-revision rates than hybrid fixation constructs (19 versus 26%, P = .043). Using multivariable regression, a construct with hybrid fixation with cones (odds ratio = 2.39; P = .037) was an independent risk factor for failure. Utilization of cones alone did not have an effect on re-revision rates at 3.4-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: While we found no difference with the use of cones, patients undergoing revision TKA with a hinge prosthesis and fully cemented stems had better overall survivorship than hybrid stems.

Patient Frailty is Correlated With Increased Adverse Events and Costs After Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Frailty can predict adverse outcomes after various orthopaedic procedures, but is not well-studied in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We investigated the correlation between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and post-rTKA outcomes. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified rTKA patients discharged from January 2017 to November 2019 for the most common diagnoses (mechanical loosening, infection, and instability). Using HFRS, we compared 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and hospitalization cost between frail and nonfrail patients with multivariate and binomial regressions. The 30-day complication and reoperation rates were compared using univariate analyses. We identified 25,177 mechanical loosening patients, 12,712 infection patients, and 9,458 instability patients. RESULTS: Frail patients had higher rates of 30-day readmission (7.8 versus 3.7% for loosening, 13.5 versus 8.1% for infection, 8.7 versus 3.9% for instability; P < .01), longer length of stay (4.1 versus 2.4 days for loosening, 8.1 versus 4.4 days for infection, 4.9 versus 2.4 days for instability; P < .01), and greater cost ($32,082 versus $27,582 for loosening, $32,898 versus $28,115 for infection, $29,790 versus $24,164 for instability; P < .01). Frail loosening patients had higher 30-day complication (6.8 versus 2.9%, P < .01) and reoperation rates (1.8 versus 1.2%, P = .01). Frail infection patients had higher 30-day complication rates (14.0 versus 8.3%, P < .01). Frail instability patients had higher 30-day complication (8.0 versus 3.5%, P < .01) and reoperation rates (3.2 versus 1.6%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The HFRS may identify patients at risk for adverse events and increased costs after rTKA. Further research is needed to determine causation and mitigate complications and costs.

Medicaid Patients Travel Disproportionately Farther for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Access to high-quality care for revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) is poorly understood but may vary based on insurance type. This study investigated distance traveled for hip and knee rTJA based on insurance type. METHODS: A total of 317 revision hips and 431 revision knees performed between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cluster sampling was used to select primary hips and knees for comparison. Median driving distance was compared based upon procedure and insurance type. RESULTS: Revision hip and knee patients traveled 18.2 and 11.0 miles farther for surgery compared to primary hip and knee patients (P ≤ .001). For hip rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled farther than Medicare patients followed by commercially insured patients with median distances traveled of 98.4, 67.2, and 35.6 miles, respectively (P = .016). Primary hip patients traveled the same distance regardless of insurance type (P = .397). For knee rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled twice as far as Medicare and commercially insured patients (medians of 85.0, 43.5, and 42.2 miles respectively, P ≤ .046). Primary knee patients showed a similar pattern (P = .264). Age and ASA-PS classification did not indicate greater comorbidity in Medicaid patients. CONCLUSION: Insurance type may influence rTJA referrals, with disproportionate referral of Medicaid and Medicare patients to nonlocal care centers. In addition to patient burden, these patterns potentially present a financial burden to facilities accepting referrals. Strategies to improve equitable access to rTJA, while maintaining the highest and most economical standards of care for patients, providers, and hospitals, are encouraged.

Impact of Comorbidities and Previous Surgery on Mid-Term Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

(1) Background: In the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the individual host status and previous surgical procedures appear to have a relevant influence on success rates and clinical outcome of knee revision surgery. Current data about the predictive value are limited in this subgroup of patients. (2) Methods: Retrospectively, 107 patients (109 knees) undergoing two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty for PJI using a rotating-hinge design with at least two years follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) for different endpoints was estimated with death as competing risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses for potential predictive factors were performed. Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical outcome were evaluated. (3) Results: At 8 years, the CI of any revision was 29.6%, and of any reoperation was 38.9%. Significant predictors for risk of re-revision were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the number of previous surgical procedures prior to explanation of the infected implant. The functional and clinical outcome demonstrated acceptable results in the present cohort with a high comorbidity level. (4) Conclusions: A compromised host status and multiple previous surgical procedures were identified as negative predictors for re-revision knee surgery in the treatment of PJI. Reinfection remained the major reason for re-revision. Overall mortality was high.

Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Treatment of Early Infections after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

GOAL: The purpose of this review is to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of the available literature on the treatment of an early prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and provide treatment guidelines. METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted using the electronic databases of PubMed, Trip, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS and SciElo. After the inclusion of the relevant articles, we extracted the data and results to compose a treatment algorithm for early and acute PJI after revision TKA. RESULTS: After applying the in- and exclusion criteria, seven articles were included in this systematic review focusing on debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for PJI following revision TKA, of which one was prospective and six were retrospective. All studies were qualified as level IV evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature suggests that DAIR is a valid treatment option for early infections after revision TKA with success rates of 50-70%. Repeat DAIR shows success rates of around 50%. Further research should be aimed at predicting successful (repeat/two-stage) DAIRs in larger study populations, antibiotic regimes and the cost effectiveness of a second DAIR after revision TKA.

Metallosis and Corrosion Associated With Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties With Metaphyseal Sleeves.

Metallosis and corrosion have been associated with metal-on-metal and modular total hip arthroplasty but are rarely described in the setting of primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this series, we report on cases of metallosis due to mechanically assisted crevice corrosion at modular junctions of machined trunnion-bore tapers in a revision TKA system with metaphyseal sleeves. The unique design of metal modular junctions used in sleeve-based revision TKA, along with potential patient and surgical factors, may predispose these designs to fretting, corrosion, and adverse reaction to metal debris. We now consider metallosis and corrosion in the workup of painful or failed revision TKAs with sleeves. Future studies that investigate the incidence of this phenomenon may be warranted.

Custom-Made Metaphyseal Sleeves in "Beyond" AORI III Defects for Revision Knee Arthroplasty-Proof of Concept and Short-Term Results of a New Technique.

BACKGROUND: While off-the-shelf cones and sleeves yield good results in AORI type 2 and 3 defects in revision knee surgery, massive longitudinal defects may require a proximal tibia replacement. To achieve the best anatomical as well as biomechanical reconstruction and preserve the tibial tuberosity, we developed custom-made metaphyseal sleeves (CMSs) to reconstruct massive defects with a hinge knee replacement. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2022, 10 patients were treated in a single-center study. The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in five cases and periprosthetic joint infection in five cases. The mean number of previous revisions after the index operations was 7 (SD: 2; 4-12). A postoperative analysis was conducted to evaluate the functional outcome as well as the osteointegrative potential. RESULTS: Implantation of the CMS in rTKA was carried out in all cases, with a mean operation time of 155 ± 48 (108-256) min. During the follow-up of 23 ± 7 (7-31) months, no CMS was revised and revisions due to other causes were conducted in five cases. Early radiographic evidence of osseointegration was recorded using a validated method. The postoperative OKS showed a significant increase (p < 0.001), with a mean score of 24 (SD: 4; range: 14-31). CONCLUSION: Custom-made metaphyseal sleeves show acceptable results in extreme cases. As custom-made components become more and more common, this treatment algorithm presents a viable alternative in complex rTKA.

Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after revisions of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties for unexplained pain vs aseptic loosening.

PURPOSE: Does patients revised for unexplained pain after mUKA present the same PROM and satisfaction scores 1-3 years after revision as patients revised for aseptic loosening?". METHODS: 104 patients undergoing revision of mUKA's for the indications unexplained pain and aseptic loosening were included in the period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. 52 patients were revised for unexplained pain and 52 for aseptic loosening. Patient demographics did not differ between the two groups. PROMs [Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D-5L, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)] and questions about satisfaction with the surgery were sent to digitally secured mailboxes. Pearson's Chi-square test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to test for statistical differences between groups. RESULTS: The median OKS 1-3 years after revision was 26 (IQR 22) for unexplained pain vs 34 (IQR 12) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.033. The median EQ-5D-5L Index after revision was 0.7 (IQR 0.6) for unexplained vs 0.8 (IQR 0.1) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.014. The median FJS after revision was 48 (IQR 10) for unexplained pain vs 52 (IQR 14) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.1. The mean satisfaction with the surgery on a 0-100 scale (100 = not satisfied; 0 = very satisfied) was 55 (IQR 60) for unexplained pain vs 50 (IQR 67) for aseptic loosening, p = 0.087, and patients revised for unexplained pain were less likely to find their knee problem importantly improved (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing revision of mUKAs for unexplained pain presented poor postoperative PROM scores, and PROM scores were worse compared to those of patients revised for aseptic loosening. Patients revised for unexplained pain were less likely to find their knee problem importantly improved. This study support the evidence against revisions for unexplained pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is the Citak classification of distal femur morphology age and gender dependent?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the distal femur morphology in different age and gender groups using the Citak classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had standard knee anteroposterior radiographs between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using the electronic patient database. Patients were divided into three age groups as follows: young adults (Group I, younger than 50 years), middle-aged adults (Group II, ranging from age 51 to 73 years), and elderly (Group III, more than 74 years). From each age group, 80 patients were randomly selected with an equal number of gender (40 males/40 females). An age-stratified selection was applied to obtain the best sample that represents the selected age groups. Patients younger than 18 years of age, history of previous fracture or surgical procedure, those with fixation implants or prosthesis, and abnormalities of the lower limb, such as a congenital deformity, were excluded from the study. All measurements were performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon familiar with the Citak classification. All measured variables were compared between age and gender groups. RESULTS: There were 240 patients (120 male and 120 female) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 20.4 (range 18-95). The distal femur morphology index was similar (p:0.811), and the morphological types were equally distributed among age groups (p:0.819). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between genders on the measured variables (p > 0.05 for all variables). Citak classification types were similarly distributed between the genders (p:0.153). No correlation was found between age and the Citak index in either gender (p:0.967 and p:0.633, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Distal femoral morphology classified by the Citak index is not age and gender dependent. Type C, which has a wider diaphyseal diameter, and is supposed to be more common in elderly subjects, was equally distributed in all age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective case series.

Aspirin as a thromboprophylaxis agent after revision knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty is a common and effective procedure. Although complication rates are low, certain complications such as venous thromboembolism are potentially serious. The optimal prophylactic agent and dosage after revision knee arthroplasty remains unclear. The main objective of this work was to study the efficacy and safety of aspirin as a thromboprophylaxis agent following revision knee arthroplasties. Patients and methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2020at a University Teaching Hospital was undertaken. The primary outcome was the development of a symptomatic thromboembolic event requiring treatment within 90 days post-surgery. The secondary outcomes were adverse events associated with aspirin therapy: surgical site infection rate; incidence of major bleeding; readmission rate and mortality within 90 days post-surgery. Results: 490 patients were included. 374 (76.3%) received prophylactic aspirin (150 mg once daily for 28 days) and 75 (15.3%) patients received dalteparin for 28 days due to contraindication to aspirin use. Those already receiving other thromboprophylaxis agents for pre-existing comorbidities continued these after relevant medical consultation. The overall rates of venous thromboembolism and symptomatic DVT after aspirin prophylaxis were 0.6% (3/490) and 0.8% (3/374), respectively. VTE incidence did not significantly differ between those administered aspirin and other agents. No patient experienced major bleeding within 90 postoperative days. Only 2 of 490 (0.4%) patients had wound infection requiring readmission; neither received prophylactic aspirin. Conclusion: Extended out-of-hospital thromboembolic prophylaxis with aspirin may be at least as effective as other agents in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty. Aspirin is safe, effective, and cheap compared with other agents.

No Association Between Hospital Volume and Early Second Revision Rate in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Dutch Orthopaedic Register.

BACKGROUND: Revision knee arthroplasty (R-KA) is rising globally. Technical difficulty of R-KA varies from liner exchange to full revision. Centralization has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity rates. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between hospital R-KA volume and overall second revision rate, as well as revision rate for different types of revision. METHODS: The R -KAs between 2010 and 2020 with available data on the primary KA in the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register were included. Minor revisions were excluded. Implant data and anonymous patient characteristics were obtained from the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register. Survival analyses and competing risk analysis were performed per volume category (≤12, 13 to 24, or ≥25 cases/year) at 1, 3, and 5 years following R-KA. There were 8,072 R-KA cases available. Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range 0 to 13.7 years). There were a total of 1,460 second revisions (18.1%) at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between second revision rates of the three volume groups. Adjusted hazard ratio for second revision were 0.97 (Confidence Interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.11) for hospitals with 13 to 24 cases/year and 0.94 (CI 0.83 to 1.07) with ≥25 cases/year compared to low volume (≤12 cases/year). Type of revision did not influence second revision rate. CONCLUSION: Second revision rate of R-KA does not seem to be dependent on hospital volume or type of revision in the Netherlands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Observational registry study.