Rolapitant treats lung cancer by targeting deubiquitinase OTUD3.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality in the world and poses a serious threat to human health. Therefore, discovering new treatments is urgently needed to improve lung cancer prognosis. Small molecule inhibitors targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system have achieved great success, in which deubiquitinase inhibitors have broad clinical applications. The deubiquitylase OTUD3 was reported to promote lung tumorigenesis by stabilizing oncoprotein GRP78, implying that inhibition of OTUD3 may be a therapeutic strategy for lung cancer. RESULTS: In this study, we identified a small molecule inhibitor of OTUD3, Rolapitant, by computer-aided virtual screening and biological experimental verification from FDA-approved drugs library. Rolapitant inhibited the proliferation of lung cancer cells by inhibiting deubiquitinating activity of OTUD3. Quantitative proteomic profiling indicated that Rolapitant significantly upregulated the expression of death receptor 5 (DR5). Rolapitant also promoted lung cancer cell apoptosis through upregulating cell surface expression of DR5 and enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, Rolapitant directly targeted the OTUD3-GRP78 axis to trigger endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP)-DR5 signaling, sensitizing lung cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In the vivo assays, Rolapitant suppressed the growth of lung cancer xenografts in immunocompromised mice at suitable dosages without apparent toxicity. CONCLUSION: In summary, the present study identifies Rolapitant as a novel inhibitor of deubiquitinase OTUD3 and establishes that the OTUD3-GRP78 axis is a potential therapeutic target for lung cancer.

Morphological and Skeletal Abnormalities Induced by Rolapitant: An Antiemetic Agent.

Introduction Rolapitant hydrochloride is a highly selective, long-acting antagonist of the neurokinin-1 (NK1RA) receptor with a high level of central nervous system (CNS) penetrance. Clinically, it is given to cancer patients with high and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The facts produced in this research support the interpretation of teratogenic effects like anatomical malformations and abnormal skeletal changes affected by high doses of rolapitant in developed chick embryos, which can be extrapolated to humans due to gaps in the literature regarding the teratogenic potential of rolapitant. As rolapitant is metabolized by the liver and excreted through the kidney by leaving a deep impact on the various systems of the body and due to its high plasma concentration with a half-life of more than 180 hours, the study was conducted to acquire some additional information about its adverse effects over the various body systems. Chick is one of the best animals for embryological laboratory research. For various reasons, it is preferred to research embryology in chicks or domestic hens (Gallus domesticus). Chick eggs are large, readily available all year, easy to incubate, and regulate artificially. Aim This study aimed to determine the morphological and skeletal abnormalities due to the effect of rolapitant, an antiemetic agent, in developing White Leghorn (G. domesticus) chicken eggs. Materials and methods The experiment used 300 fertilized White Leghorn chicken eggs. The eggs were categorized into five experimental groups (A, B, C, D, and E, each with 30 eggs) and five control groups (a, b, c, d, and e, each with 30 eggs). Rolapitant was administered into the five experimental groups of eggs on incubation day five at various concentrations of 0.00039, 0.0005, 0.00075, 0.001, and 0.00125 mg, respectively, while the control groups received the same volume (0.039, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, and 0.125 ml, respectively) of normal saline. Results At all doses, the mean weight and crown-rump (CR) length of chick embryos were significantly greater in the control group than in the experimental group. The experimental group died at a higher rate than the control group. Additionally, it was found that the mortality due to the rolapitant dosages increases with dose. All groups except group A showed skeletal anomalies such as poor ossification, bent, and displacement, and morphological abnormalities such as yolk sac retraction, hematoma, and scanty feathers were found in experimental groups C, D, and E. This was shown to be more prevalent in the experimental groups and was exacerbated by subsequent rolapitant dosages. Conclusion Rolapitant is toxic when taken in large doses and for an extended period. As a result, rolapitant should be taken only when a valid diagnosis has been established and only at the recommended dose, not at a larger dose or for an extended period of time.

Switching indication of PEGylated lipid nanocapsules-loaded with rolapitant and deferasirox against breast cancer: Enhanced in-vitro and in-vivo cytotoxicity.

Breast cancer (BC) is considered the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among adult women worldwide, and it is associated with many genetic or hormonal factors. Despite the advanced therapeutic and theranostic strategies for BC treatment, cancer metastasis and relapse are often observed among patients which lead to therapeutic failure. Accordingly, among the repositioned medication against BC proliferation is neurokinin receptor antagonists and iron chelating agents especially rolapitant HCl (RP) and deferasirox (DFO), respectively. However, RP and DFO are classified as class II with low aqueous solubility. Both drugs were nanoformulated into PEGylated lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) for enhancing their aqueous solubility and augmenting their efficacy. RP-LNCs, DFO-LNCs and their combinations were evaluated according to particle size (PS), zeta potential, polydispersity index (PDI) and surface morphology. Importantly, the antitumor effect of these novel molecules and their nanoforms was evaluated against the suppression of Ehrlich Ascites tumor model using female mice. Results revealed that RP-LNCs, DFO-LNCs and RP/DFO-LNCs exerted PS from 45.23 ± 3.54 to 60.1 ± 3.32 nm with PDI around 0.20 which indicates homogenous particles distribution. Also, RP-LNCs, DFO-LNCs and RP/DFO-LNCs displayed surface charges of +16.6 ± 6.9, -13.3 ± 5.82 and - 20.2 ± 5.40 mV, respectively. The obtained LNCs conferred a high potent cytotoxic effect against MCF7 cancer cells as compared to parent drugs, with IC50 of 10.86 ± 0.89, 3.34 ± 0.99 and 2.24 ± 0.97 µg/mL for RP-LNCs, DFO-LNCs and RP/DFO-LNCs, respectively. The in-vivo pharmacodynamics effect of the developed nano-formulations showed superior antitumor effect for the individual drugs rather than their combinations as compared to the control group. The current study confirmed the potential of RP and DFO nanoforms as promising therapeutic agents for BC treatment.

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist rolapitant suppresses anxiety and alcohol intake produced by repeated withdrawal episodes.

Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1r) antagonists have been shown to suppress operant self-administration of alcohol, voluntary alcohol consumption and stress-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behaviour. Considering the long half-life and anxiolytic-like properties of NK1r antagonist rolapitant, we expected that it may be an effective option for reducing anxiety and alcohol motivation during early withdrawal. Voluntary alcohol intake (two-bottles paradigm) was recorded in male Wistar rats during the three periods: 24 days (basal level), 6-day period when rats received 5 mg·kg-1 rolapitant or vehicle and 12-h period after repeated withdrawal episodes (alcohol cessation for 36 h). We found that upon intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration, rolapitant rapidly penetrated into specific rat brain regions - amygdala, hypothalamus and neocortex - implicated in the control of anxiety and reward. Rolapitant did not affect basal voluntary alcohol intake, but significantly suppressed anxiety-like behaviour and alcohol consumption following withdrawal episodes. Our findings suggest that rolapitant should be further investigated as a novel treatment option for relapse prevention in alcohol-dependent patients.

New repurposed rolapitant in nanovesicular systems for lung cancer treatment: Development, in-vitro assessment and in-vivo biodistribution study.

Lung cancer is characterized by poor prognosis, and is considered a serious disease that causes a significant mortality. The available conventional chemotherapeutic agents suffer from several limitations; hence, new drug molecules are constantly being sought. In the current study, lipid nanovesicles (LNVs) were selected as a colloidal vehicle for encapsulation of the FDA-approved drug; rolapitant (RP), which is used particularly for the treatment of nausea and vomiting, but is repurposed for the treatment of lung cancer in the current work. RP was loaded into various LNVs (liposomes, ethosomes and transethosomes) using the thin film hydration method, and the LNVs were evaluated for particle size, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency (EE%), storage stability and surface morphology. Besides, the in-vitro drug release, in-vitro cytotoxicity on A549 lung cancer cells, nebulization performance using next generation impactor (NGI), and the in-vivo biodistribution behavior were evaluated. The selected ethosomal and transethosomal vesicles displayed a particle size less than 400 nm, a positive charge, and EE% exceeding 90% for RP, with a sustained release pattern over 15 days. The in-vivo biodistribution results proved the high lung deposition potential of RP-LNVs with a considerable safety. Besides, the developed RP-LNVs were able to reach the metastatic organs of lung cancer, hence they were proven promising as a possible treatment modality for lung cancer.

Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist Reverses Functional CNS Alteration Caused by Combined γ-rays and Carbon Nuclei Irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Ionizing Radiation (IR) is one of the major limiting factors for human deep-space missions. Preventing IR-induced cognitive alterations in astronauts is a critical success factor. It has been shown that cognitive alterations in rodents can be inferred by alterations of a psycho- emotional balance, primarily an anxiogenic effect of IR. In our recent work, we hypothesized that the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor might be instrumental for such alterations. OBJECTIVE: The NK1 receptor antagonist rolapitant and the classic anxiolytic diazepam (as a comparison drug) were selected to test this hypothesis on Wistar rats. METHODS: Pharmacological substances were administered through intragastric probes. We used a battery of tests for a comprehensive ethological analysis. High-performance liquid chromatography was applied to quantify monoamines content. An analysis of mRNA expression was performed by real-time PCR. Protein content was studied by the Western blotting technique. RESULTS: Our salient finding includes no substantial changes in anxiety, locomotor activity and cognitive abilities of treated rats under irradiation. No differences were found in the content of monoamines. We discovered a synchronous effect on mRNA expression and protein content of 5- HT2a and 5-HT4 receptors in the prefrontal cortex, as well as decreased content of serotonin transporter and increased content of tryptophan hydroxylase in the hypothalamus of irradiated rats. Rolapitant affected the protein amount of a number of serotonin receptors in the amygdala of irradiated rats. CONCLUSION: Rolapitant may be the first atypical radioprotector, providing symptomatic treatment of CNS functional disorders in astronauts caused by IR.

The next generation of antiemetics for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) afflict approximately 30% of patients overall and up to 80% of high-risk patients after surgery. Optimal pharmacological prophylaxis of PONV is challenging as it necessitates the consideration of PONV risk, drug efficacy, and potential adverse effects. Despite significant advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology and risk factors of PONV, its incidence has remained largely unchanged. Newer antiemetics have been introduced that may have improved safety profiles, longer duration of action, and better efficacy. This review aims to summarize the recent developments pertaining to these new agents and their potential application toward the management of PONV.

The safety of rolapitant for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy.

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a significant clinical issue that affects patients' quality of life as well as treatment decisions. Significant improvements in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting have occurred in the past 15 years with the introduction of new antiemetic agents 5-HT3, receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, and olanzapine. Oral (aprepitant, 2003; netupitant, 2014; rolapitant, 2015) neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists have been developed along with intravenous formulations (fosaprepitant, NEPA, rolapitant, HTX-019) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Areas covered: This review presents a description of the safety and efficacy of rolapitant along with a comparison to the other oral and intravenous formulations of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists.Expert opinion: Oral rolapitant has been demonstrated in clinical trials to be safe and effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Rolapitant has a longer half-life (180 h) than other commercially available NK-1 receptor antagonists and does not induce or inhibit CYP34A, unlike the other NK-1 receptor antagonists. Future studies may determine if these may be important clinical issues.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Rolapitant in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting.

Population pharmacokinetics of rolapitant and its active metabolite M19 were studied in 482 patients receiving this neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients received a single dose of rolapitant (range, 9-180 mg) before administration of moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed via nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Rolapitant pharmacokinetics was best characterized by a 2-compartment model. Population typical values were estimated to be 0.962 L/h for apparent oral clearance and 214 L for central compartment volume of distribution. The intercompartment clearance and peripheral compartment volume of distribution was estimated to be 2.79 L/h and 164 L, respectively. Metabolite M19 pharmacokinetics was described by a 1-compartment model with an apparent metabolite clearance of 1.83 L/h. Intersubject variability was moderate for pharmacokinetics parameters. Weight positively correlated with central compartment volume of distribution and peripheral compartment volume of distribution but not with apparent oral clearance. No other demographic, clinical, or pathophysiologic covariates, including liver and renal function, influenced rolapitant pharmacokinetics. A slight positive trend was observed between rolapitant exposure and efficacy (ie, complete response defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase of CINV (>24-120 hours after chemotherapy). This further supports the 180-mg dose of rolapitant in CINV patients. In summary, this validated population pharmacokinetic model satisfactorily describes pharmacokinetics of rolapitant and M19 in patients with CINV. These results support the recommendation that no dose adjustment for patient variables investigated is necessary.

An Open-Label, Randomized, Pivotal Bioequivalence Study of Oral Rolapitant.

Rolapitant, a selective and long-acting neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is approved in an oral formulation for prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults. This pivotal open-label, randomized, single-dose, multicenter, parallel-group study assessed the bioequivalence of a single oral dose of 180 mg of rolapitant administered in tablet (2 × 90-mg tablets) or capsule (4 × 45-mg capsules) form in healthy male and female subjects. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected predose and at times up to 912 hours postdose. The rolapitant tablet was considered bioequivalent to the rolapitant capsule if the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the geometric means for rolapitant, observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), and area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) were within the 0.80-1.25 range. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the capsule group (n = 43) and tablet group (n = 44) were similar. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 0.99 (0.89-1.11) and 1.05 (0.92-1.19), respectively, establishing bioequivalence of the rolapitant tablet and capsule formulations. Both formulations were well tolerated, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the 2 groups.