Mobilizing nurses to address the opioid misuse epidemic.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is a major health challenge in the United States. PURPOSE: Members from the American Academy of Nursing joined to write a consensus paper about nurses' role in the opioid epidemic. METHODS: The panel reviewed the history of the opioid epidemic and policies to care for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and how registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice nurses (APRNs) could increase care for people with OUD. DISCUSSION: Recommendations are presented to advance policies that empower RNs and APRNs to abate the opioid epidemic. CONCLUSION: Recommendations include (a) advance legislation that supports RNs and APRNs full scope of practice and expands professional role in pain management and addiction prevention; (b) evaluate effective policies that promote RN and APRN care; support federal elimination of X-waiver with state law alignment; (c) sustain the use of nurses in telemedicine; (d) support nursing research on nurse involvement in all aspects of OUD.

Scope of Nursing Practice as Perceived by Nurses Working in Saudi Arabia.

The absence of scope of practice guidelines may lead to role ambiguity and legal consequences in nursing practice. This study measures the scope of practice of nurses in Saudi Arabia. The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design using an electronic version of the Arabic Actual Scope of Nursing Practice (A-ASCOP) questionnaire among 928 nurses. Descriptive analysis was followed by a t-test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance was assured through the Bonferroni test; the effect size was measured through partial η2 when appropriate. The A-ASCOP mean score of each dimension ranged from 4.29 to 4.72 (overall mean = 4.59). Significant overall ASCOP score variations were evident, with higher ASCOP among expatriate nurses, females, Hospital Operation Program (HOP) nurses, and nurses with postgraduate qualifications. Partial η2 showed a small effect of <0.016. Low-complexity nursing tasks showed insignificant differences no matter the nurse's position, but were less practiced by Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) and advanced-degree nurses than by those with a diploma education. High complexity of ASCOP was practiced significantly more often by postgraduate-prepared nurses than by diploma-educated nurses. The study showed that there is a range of variation in nursing practice, but that the lack of internal regulations (nursing scope of practice) has no effect on nursing duties. In a country such as Saudi Arabia, where massive national improvement initiatives are frequent, clearly defining the scope of practice for nurses is essential and needs to be done through government mandates. Further studies are essential to define what the scope of practice should include.

Scope of nursing practice on a surgery ward: A time-motion study.

AIM: To log the activities of registered nurses and nursing assistants on a visceral surgery ward. BACKGROUND: By prioritizing their activities, nurses fail to exercise their full scope of practice even though this is essential for health care systems to function effectively and efficiently. METHOD: A descriptive observational time-motion study was conducted over a period of 48 days. The activities of nurses (n = 24) and nursing assistants (n = 9) were logged over the course of their entire work shifts, both in the day and at night. RESULTS: In all, 499 hr of observation were logged. Tasks that fell under the dimensions of care activities and of communication and care coordination, which cover documentation, non-care activities and delegated medical tasks, were the ones that took up most of the nurse work time. Patient assessment, relational care, therapeutic teaching/coaching, and knowledge updating and utilization were categories that nurses were under-engaged in. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the scope of nursing practice was not optimal. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The results can serve to improve the work environment of carers, optimize the use of human resources and increase the visibility and efficiency of nursing work.

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on enrolled nurses, practical nurses and other second-level nursing roles: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Significant workforce shortages and economic pressures have led to the expanded scope and reintroduction of new roles for second-level nurses in many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Given this, there is a need to understand the emic and etic perspectives of second-level nurses, to ensure collaborative teamwork and safe patient care. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize qualitative research evidence on healthcare professionals' perspectives on second-level nursing roles in the healthcare workforce. These findings inform recommendations that would influence the development and implementation of these roles in healthcare organisations. DESIGN: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research was conducted. Six databases were systematically searched and forward and backwards searching completed. Included studies focused on healthcare professionals' perspectives (including views of second-level nurses themselves) on second-level nursing roles. All included articles were from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was used to assess the evidence quality. The results section of each included article was coded and descriptive themes were developed. An interpretative and iterative process led to the final analytic themes. FINDINGS: Twenty-six qualitative studies were identified from five countries over 26 years. Four analytic themes were identified: undifferentiated role; efficient but limited; subordinated task-doers; and broadening scope and strengthened identity. The synthesis demonstrated dichotomies wherein some second-level nursing roles were devalued, and others had increasing scope and responsibility. Role and boundary confusion was evident and had not decreased over time. Hierarchies in nursing practice underlined the split between critical thinking and hands-on approaches to care which, in some cases, debased the second-level nursing role because of its association with practical hands-on care. CONCLUSIONS: The analytic themes in this synthesis suggest that second-level nurses have faced the same issues over decades with little change. Perceptions of second-level nursing roles are primarily influenced by meso (organisational level) factors and micro (individual, behavioural) factors. The synthesis concludes that a cultural shift in valuing the hands-on care provided by second-level nursing is necessary, along with systems-level shift that clarifies the role of second-level nursing within healthcare teams to enhance collaborative practice. Further research should attend to macro-level influences on perceptions of second-level nurses, the work they do, and how this is valued or institutionally embedded. Tweetable abstract: Healthcare professionals' perspectives on second-level nursing roles: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

[The scope of nursing practice at the heart of modern nursing]. / Le rôle propre infirmier au cœur de la modernité soignante.

Advanced practice is now possible in nursing practice in France. It is starting to be taught at university. Significant changes to practices are taking place in the short term, for nurses. In this context, it is interesting to look back at the foundations of nursing autonomy rooted in the origins of the scope of nursing practice.

[Survey: 40 years of the scope of nursing practice, what is the current state of affairs?] / Enquête : 40 ans du rôle propre infirmier, quel état des lieux ?

The French law of 31 May 1978 introduced the scope of nursing practice. Forty years later, the nurse training institute at Montceau-les-Mines hospital took the opportunity to study nurses' perception of this law today and the way in which they implement it. Overview of the main results of a survey carried out of student nurses during the course of 2018.

[The evolution of nursing record-keeping]. / Regard sur l'évolution des écrits professionnels infirmiers.

Nursing record-keeping forms an integral part of the provision of care. It helps to assure its traceability and monitoring. It also contributes to the circulation of information among the different players involved in the patient's treatment, thereby helping to assure the quality and safety of care. For nurses, whose professional history has its roots in a culture of oral communication, record-keeping represents the affirmation of a real nursing way of thinking.

Guideline Implementation: Moderate Sedation/Analgesia.

Moderate sedation/analgesia is practiced in a variety of settings and delivered by a variety of health care providers, with a goal of reducing the patient's anxiety and discomfort during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The updated AORN "Guideline for care of the patient receiving moderate sedation/analgesia" provides guidance on RN administration of moderate sedation/analgesia within the scope of nursing practice as defined by the state boards of nursing. The guideline addresses patient selection and assessment, staffing for the procedure, patient monitoring, medication administration, and criteria for postoperative discharge. This article focuses on key points of the guideline to promote safe care throughout the perioperative continuum for a patient receiving moderate sedation/analgesia. Perioperative RNs should review the complete guideline for additional information and for guidance when writing and updating policies and procedures.