Longitudinal Analysis of Retinal Thickness and Retinal Function in Eyes with Large Drusen Secondary to Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the longitudinal association between outer retinal microstructure and mesopic as well as scotopic retinal sensitivity in patients with drusen secondary to intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal natural history study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine eyes of 54 patients with large drusen (> 125 µm) associated with iAMD and 27 age-matched healthy control eyes. METHODS: Participants underwent spectral-domain OCT and both mesopic and scotopic fundus-controlled perimetry (FCP). Annual follow-up visits were performed over a 3-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pointwise correlation of retinal sensitivity stimuli to corresponding standardized (Z score) pointwise retinal thickness. Linear mixed-effect models were applied to analyze longitudinally the association of pointwise retinal thickness changes, follow-up time, or both with retinal function. RESULTS: At baseline, mean pointwise sensitivity in patients was reduced by -1.67 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.22 to -1.12) for mesopic and by -2.34 dB (95% CI, -2.85 to -1.84) for scotopic testing compared with controls with a pointwise sensitivity change of -0.35 dB/year (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.28) for mesopic and +0.20 dB/year (95% CI, 0.12-0.29) for scotopic testing, respectively (P < 0.001). Retinal thickness analysis in patients revealed a significantly thinner outer nuclear layer (ONL) by -0.49 standard deviation (SD; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.28 SD) and a significant thicker retinal pigment epithelium-drusen complex (RPEDC) by +3.22 SD (95% CI, 2.27-4.17 SD) at baseline, respectively (P < 0.001). During follow-up, retinal thickness thickened further by +0.51 SD/year (RPEDC) and thinned by -0.03 SD/year (ONL; P = 0.045) and -0.34 SD/year (inner and outer photoreceptor segments) in patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Structure-function analysis showed a significant association of the ONL and the RPEDC thickness change with both types of FCP sensitivity testing (P < 0.001). Besides, follow-up time had a significant (independent) effect on mesopic and scotopic retinal sensitivity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal structure-function correlation demonstrated a progressive quantifiable degeneration of the outer retina in iAMD associated with photoreceptor dysfunction. Because longitudinal sensitivity changes could not be explained by structural changes alone, an unmet need remains for additional refined parameters on retinal structure to predict retinal function.

Slowed dark adaptation in older eyes; effect of location.

PURPOSE: The rate of rod sensitivity recovery following a photobleach is a basic measure of the integrity of the outer retina. Rods are selectively impaired in aging and many disorders of the retina, notably Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). It is not known for certain whether the age-related deficit is a pan-retinal effect or if there are localised regions of impaired rod function. To address this important issue a dual arc stimulus was developed that samples sensitivity recovery in two retinal locations. METHODS: Arc-shaped stimuli were presented on a black CRT screen at two locations, in the inferior visual field. Following a bleach, which was localised to the stimuli, recovery of sensitivity was measured using a modified method of adjustment technique. Neutral density filters were used to extend the luminance range of the CRT. Sensitivity recovery functions were fitted by non-linear regression to a seven-parameter model. RESULTS: Pairs of sensitivity recovery functions were generated from the stimuli. The cone phases of these functions were identical. The slopes of the S2 sections of the curves were steeper for the outer stimuli for both young (p < 0.001) and older (p = 0.003) observers. The difference between the two was the same for the two groups. The α point was reached slightly earlier for the young observers and with the outer stimulus but neither of these effects reached statistical significance. The ß point occurred earlier for the outer stimuli and this effect was statistically significant only for the older group. CONCLUSIONS: The method places minimal demands on observers. The fact that rod sensitivity recovery is slowed in the older normal eye to the same extent in the two locations suggests that this deficit may be uniform across the retina. As there are localised losses in scotopic function in AMD, the technique is ideally suited to distinguishing impaired recovery dynamics due to normal ageing from those caused by disease.