Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Rural Health ; 40(3): 574-584, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321268

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our objective was to investigate rural adolescents' use of firearms and whether they had received firearm training. METHODS: 2019 Iowa FFA Leadership Conference attendees were surveyed. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and eighty-two FFA members aged 13-18 years participated. The vast majority (85%) had fired a rifle/shotgun; 58% reported firing them >20 times. Of those who had fired rifles/shotguns, 32% had done so before 9 years old; 79% before 13 years. Most had also fired a handgun (62%), with 30% having fired handguns >20 times. Of those who had fired handguns, 34% had done so before 11 years old. The average age for first firing rifles/shotguns was 10.1 (SD 2.9) years, and 11.9 (SD 2.8) years for handguns. Males, older teenagers, and those living on farms or in the country had significantly greater percentages that had fired a rifle/shotgun or a handgun. Greater proportions of males had used firearms >20 times and started firing them at younger ages. Over half (55%) reported having gone hunting. Of those, 24% first hunted before 9 years old; 48% before 11 years. Of those who had used a firearm, 61% had completed a firearm safety training course. For hunters, 80% had taken a course. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants had used firearms, and many did so at very young ages. Substantial numbers had not received formal training. The authors believe that families should be counseled when it is developmentally appropriate to introduce youth to firearms, and all should take firearm safety training before using them.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Población Rural , Humanos , Adolescente , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Iowa , Masculino , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología
2.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 27(1): 79-87, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088217

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to determine whether handguns discharged at the craniomaxillofacial region are associated with greater fatality in suicide attempts relative to shotguns. METHODS: The following retrospective cohort study was completed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database. The primary predictor variable was the type of firearm (handguns vs. shotguns). The primary outcome variable was prognosis (fatality vs. no fatality). A binary logistic regression was performed to determine the risk of mortality of all predictor variables. RESULTS: Our final sample consisted of 223 patients. Handguns (85.2%) were the most popular firearm. Relative to black patients, white patients were over three times more likely to die (p < 0.05). Compared to patients who were transferred in, patients not transferred in were eight times more likely to die (p = 0.000). Relative to patients who were admitted electively, patients who were not admitted electively were 16.7 times more likely to die (p < 0.01). Finally, relative to patients who used shotguns, patients who used handguns were 3.4 times more likely to die (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the maxillofacial region by handguns were more lethal than shotguns.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos
3.
Inj Epidemiol ; 8(Suppl 1): 29, 2021 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the wake of an epidemic in firearm-related deaths and injuries, youth have become leading voices of concern. This study's objective was to investigate rural youth's personal experiences with firearm-related violence, and their attitudes towards firearms and gun violence prevention strategies. METHODS: Attendees of the 2019 Iowa FFA Leadership Conference were surveyed about personal experiences with firearm-associated deaths and injuries, and their attitudes regarding firearm-related issues. Descriptive (frequencies), bivariate (chi square, Fisher's exact test) and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed utilizing Stata 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas). RESULTS: Responses from 1382 FFA members 13-18 years of age were analyzed. About 5% had personally seen someone threatened with a firearm. Over one-third (36%) stated they knew someone who had been killed or injured by gunfire. Of these, over two-thirds knew of someone who had died or was injured unintentionally and 30% knew of someone killed or injured intentionally (e.g. suicide). Nearly all agreed or strongly agreed that the right to use firearms for hunting and shooting sports should be legal (94%), that a firearm safety course should be required to get a hunting license (89%), and that there should be a required background check before purchasing a firearm (89%). Over three-fifths (61%) agreed or strongly agreed that there should be laws requiring safe storage of firearms in homes. Although still high, lesser support for firearm safety policies was seen among males, older youth, participants living on farms or in the country, and youth who hunted, had firearms in their homes, and/or were in homes with unsafe firearm storage. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of youth in this study supported firearm safety measures including required training, background checks, and safe firearm storage in homes. These findings are consistent with the national youth-led call for firearm safety. Additionally, over one-third of respondents personally knew someone who was killed or injured by a firearm and 5% had seen someone or been personally threatened with firearm violence. Our study did not investigate the effects of firearm violence on participants' mental health and wellbeing, but future studies addressing this question seem highly justified.

4.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 21(3): 356-361, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29519986

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Short-range shotgun wounds of the craniomaxillofacial region are life-threatening and are as devastating as military rifle wounds. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the pattern of presentation of craniomaxillofacial shotgun injuries, types of shotgun injuries, and the outcome of treatments in our environment. SETTING AND DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted from February 2006 to March 2012. All patients with shotgun wounds to the craniomaxillofacial region were included in the study by convenient sampling method. Glezer's shotgun classification scheme was used to categorize the patients into short-, intermediate-, and long-range shotgun wounds. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 16. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the data. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for all quantitative variables such as age. Frequency and percentages were presented for qualitative variables. RESULTS: A total number of 28 patients were seen. Ages ranged from 19 to 64 years with a mean (±SD) of 32.7 (±11.4) years. The two most commonly used shotguns were locally made pistol (25, 42.9%) and the cut-size gun (10, 35.7%) and the least commonly used was Dane gun (1, 3.6%). Close-range injury to the face was 17 (60.7%) while that of intermediate- and long-range injuries were 6 (21.1%) and 5 (17.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Wounds sustained from close-range shotguns to the face were the most common in this environment. The outcome of treatment was satisfactory when treated with conservative debridement and early reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Armas de Fuego , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/epidemiología , Maxilar/lesiones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Huesos Faciales/cirugía , Traumatismos Faciales/cirugía , Femenino , Armas de Fuego/clasificación , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/etiología , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos Mandibulares/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/clasificación , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adulto Joven
5.
J Forensic Sci ; 61 Suppl 1: S159-62, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26418185

RESUMEN

Suicide by shotgun is a common method of suicide with high regional variation. We sought to describe their distinct, challenging features and provide demographic and risk characteristics. We reviewed 228 gunshot wounds autopsied at Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2014; of these, 75 (32.9%) were shotgun wounds. All were suicides and contact range. Ages ranged from 14 to 92 years old; of these, 97% were men. The majority involved the head (70.9%), were intraoral (48.2%), and had upward (73.2%) and backward (73.2%) directionality. Next most common was the chest (21.5%), with backward (94.1%) and downward (64.7%) directionality. Four involved multiple wounds. Wadding was recovered in 16 (21.3%) cases. Six (8.0%) had a survival period. Most (66.7%) took place at home. Seventy-one percent had a known psychiatric history; 32.4% had positive toxicology. Although contact range shotgun wounds cause severe destruction, entrance wound and other characteristic are identifiable with thorough scene, autopsy, and radiographic documentation.


Asunto(s)
Suicidio , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Autopsia , Femenino , Armas de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Adulto Joven
6.
Arch Trauma Res ; 3(2): e18950, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25147780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients, who survived from shotgun injuries, often have some retained lead pellets in their bodies. Several cases of lead toxicity have been reported regarding these patients. OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to compare the serum lead level in patients who have retained lead pellets in their bodies with the control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this case-control study, we gathered the serum lead levels of 25 patients with some retained lead pellets in their bodies due to shotgun and 25 volunteers without similar lead exposure and compared them in view of the age, gender, and living place. RESULTS: While the mean serum lead level in both groups was lower than the standard level (i.e. 40 µg/dL) , the mean ± SD of serum lead level were 29 ± 12.8 µg/dL and 25.3 ± 6.4 µg/dL in the case and control groups, respectively without any significant difference (P = 0. 30) . However, a positive relationship was seen between serum lead level, and the number of retained lead pellets (r = 0.447, P = 0. 025) . CONCLUSIONS: Although extensive surgery to remove the lead pellets is not recommended in patients injured with shotguns, those with many retained lead pellets in their bodies should be considered at risk for lead poisoning and monitored carefully.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA