Functional Composite Spacer (Antibiotic Cement around a Hemiarthroplasty) for the Treatment of Shoulder Infections: Minimum 5-Year Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infections remain a challenging complication following shoulder arthroplasty and an ideal treatment protocol has yet to be established. Two-stage revision is a common approach. Historically, the first stage entails placement of an all-cement antibiotic spacer. While prior studies have reported on cement spacers as definitive management, persistent pain and inadequate function often lead many to later request a second stage procedure. The functional composite spacer consists of a humeral hemiarthroplasty implant with antibiotic cement coated around the stem alone to preserve the metallic humeral head-glenoid articulation. Functional composite spacers have demonstrated improvements in function and motion with high patient satisfaction at 25 months, but longer-term follow-up is needed to better understand the role it may play in the management of shoulder infections. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes at a minimum of 5 years in patients who initially planned to undergo two-stage revision but elected to retain the functional spacer. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single institution's shoulder surgery repository from 2007 to 2018 identified 30 patients who underwent placement of a composite spacer. Overall, 5 patients underwent second stage reimplantation and 12 patients did not have 5-year follow-up (6 lost to follow-up and 6 deceased). A total 13 patients were included who maintained a functional composite spacer and had minimum 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures (ASES, SST, SANE, VAS F and VAS P), satisfaction, range of motion, and radiographic estimation of glenoid wear were evaluated. RESULTS: Two of 13 patients (15%) required additional surgery: one secondary closure for early superficial wound dehiscence and one revision spacer for pain. There were no re-infections. At most recent follow-up patient satisfaction was high and significant improvements were noted for ASES (45.4; p<0.001), SST (5.3; p=0.003), SANE (47.3; p=0.002), VAS F (4.9; p=0.004), and VAS P (-4.4; p=0.007) as well as range of motion including abduction (39.2˚; p=0.005) and elevation (65.9˚; p=0.005). There was no significant change in humeral head medialization (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who do not undergo an early revision and retain a functional composite spacer maintain good function and range of motion with minimal pain at mid-term follow-up.

Cemented Versus Uncemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: National Shoulder Arthroplasty Data from Türkiye.

Background: This study evaluated national trends in cemented and uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures using a comprehensive national surgical database. This study aimed to compare RSA used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the literature and to determine the country's trend. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the health records of individuals aged ≥ 18 years who underwent RSA for proximal humerus fractures between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into cemented and uncemented groups, and demographic data (age, sex), duration of hospital stay, transfusions, revisions, mortality, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were analyzed. Results: A total of 618 cemented RSA and 1,364 uncemented RSA procedures were reviewed. Patients who underwent cemented RSA were significantly older than those who had uncemented RSA (p = 0.002). Transfusion rates were higher in the cemented RSA group (p = 0.006). The frequency of revision surgery was 6.1%. Younger age and male sex were associated with revision (p < 0.001). CCI scores were higher among transfused patients than non-transfused patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of cemented RSA was 11.7% and 49% in 2016 and 2022, respectively. Differences were found among hospital types and geographical regions. Conclusions: While cemented RSA has been gaining attention and increased application in recent years for proximal humerus fractures, uncemented RSA still predominates. The choice between these 2 methods is largely influenced by regional and hospital-level factors. The type of RSA and high CCI scores were found to have no significant impact on the risk of surgical revision.

Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a commonly performed procedure to treat degenerative conditions of the shoulder. With its growing utilization, techniques to reliably diagnose and treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have become increasingly important. In this review we outline the current research and prevention methods of prosthetic joint infection in rTSA. This includes preoperative considerations, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: There is currently no established standardized protocol for preoperative infection prevention or post operative management. However, recent studies have identified risk factors for infection, as well as successful prevention techniques that can be implemented to minimize infection risk. Although there is no standardized protocol currently utilized to diagnose and treat shoulder PJI, we outline a potential set of preventative measures and postoperative management strategies that clinicians can use to properly diagnose and treat patients with this difficult condition.

Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results.

Purpose: To evaluate both the short-term clinical and radiological results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with uncemented locked stem in the management of a proximal humerus fracture (PHFs) in the elderly. Methods: Retrospective study including 40 consecutive 3-4 part proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. In all the cases, the greater tuberosity (GT) was reattached with a standardized suture technique and a local horseshoe bone graft. All the patients were assessed at the 24-month follow-up with Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Score (VAS). Radiographic healing of the greater tuberosity was noted in addition to stem locking screws radiographic changes. Complications and revision rates were reported. Results: Mean final CMS for this cohort was 80 points. The greater tuberosity healed in the anatomic position in 90% of the cases (N = 36), obtaining an average CMS of 80 in these patients. Healing of the greater tuberosity did not occur in 10% of the cases (N = 4), obtaining an average CMS of 60. All patients scored above 100° in forward elevation with a mean of 140°. Mean active external rotation was 30°. Low-grade scapular notching was reported in <1% of the cases. Major complications were reported in one patient with an acromial fracture. No complications or loosening of stem locking screws were noted. There were no reoperations. Conclusion: In the elderly population, reverse shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a fracture-specific locking stem, low-profile metaphysis, suture-friendly groove, meticulous suture technique, and local bone grafting allows adequate fixation, variable prosthesis height adjustment, and enhances greater tuberosity healing. This approach yields positive short-term clinical outcomes without complications related to the stem's locking screws. Level of Evidence: Level IV Retrospective Case Series.

Latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Background: This paper aims to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) tendon transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and to compare that to isolated RSA. Methods: A comprehensive search on PubMeb, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL was performed from inception up to January 20, 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cohort studies, case-control studies, randomized controlled trials and case series that were written in English, which involved patients who underwent RSA with LD/TM transfer were included. Quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Systematic review of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and range of movement (ROM) was conducted. Results: Eight studies with a total of 265 patients were included. The average mean follow-up time was 42.5 months, with a range of 6 months to 136 months. Of the studies that reported outcomes of RSA with LD/TM transfer, five reported the CMS, five reported external rotation (ER) ROM and six reported forward flexion ROM. Comparing postoperative to preoperative scores, there was an improvement above the minimal clinically important difference for CMS (mean difference (MD) range = 22.40 to 41.80), ER (MD range = 29° to 36°) and forward flexion (MD range = 50° to 75°). Three studies that compared postoperative ER between RSA with and without LD/TM reported no significant difference. Conclusion: RSA with LD/TM transfer has good clinical outcomes postoperatively, but there is insufficient comparative data to suggest that it is superior or inferior to an isolated RSA.

Tensionable lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

A lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is commonly performed during total shoulder arthroplasty to access the glenohumeral joint. Healing of the LTO is critical to optimizing the outcome of the procedure and is enhanced by a repair that provides stability and compression across the osteotomy site. The purpose of this article is to describe a technique that uses a tensionable suture construct to repair the LTO during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a stemless humeral component. The technique involves passing a row of high-tensile sutures through bone tunnels lateral to the osteotomy site (transosseous sutures) and another row of sutures through the humeral implant (implant sutures). One limb of each bone tunnel suture is then tied to its corresponding limb of implant suture and the remaining free strands of the tied sutures are manually tensioned and tied to each other. This technique is an efficient and reproducible method for creating compression and stability across the osteotomy site that facilitates bony healing.

Structural bone grafting for glenoid bone loss in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series and technique report.

Background: Posterior glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis poses significant challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a humeral head autograft to address the glenoid bone deficiency is an option for these difficult cases. Variable results with this procedure are reported in the literature. This article describes the surgical technique of posterior glenoid bone grafting in TSA using a glenoid implant with hybrid fixation and a series of reported patient functional and radiographic outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review of cases from 2015 to 2020 by a single surgeon revealed 10 patients who underwent primary TSA with hybrid glenoid component and posterior glenoid bone grafting. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for glenoid inclination, glenoid version, acromiohumeral distance, humeral stem status, and glenoid implant status. Functional outcomes were evaluated by range of motion, strength, and patient-reported clinical outcomes (pain and function on a visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score). Complications and reoperations were also evaluated. Results: Average follow-up was 31.4 months, active forward flexion and external rotation improved on average from 105° to 150° and 20° to 60°, respectively (P < .001) and average abduction improved from 100° to 140° (P < .002). At an average of 26.7 months, patients reported assessments (visual analog scale pain and function, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores) reveal significant (P < .05) improvement in pain and functional outcomes. Radiographically, at 23.0 ± 20.1 months, all patients demonstrated a well-fixed humeral and glenoid component without evidence of lucent lines. The bone graft used in each patient was well unionized and no radiographic complications were reported. No patients underwent revision surgery, and there was one clinical complication reported, which consisted of a suspected rotator cuff injury at follow-up. Conclusion: Hybrid fixation with structural glenoid bone grafting in TSA resulted in excellent outcomes with no evidence of graft or component failure on follow-up radiographs and significantly reduced pain, improved functional scores, and improved active range of motion.

Convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty has become an increasingly common procedure used to treat degenerative, inflammatory, and traumatic conditions of the glenohumeral joint. With a significant increase in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, revision procedures have likewise increased. Updates in shoulder arthroplasty have allowed for the convertibility of implants, which allows for the retention of both glenoid and humeral components during revision surgery. This review aims to highlight the epidemiology, indications, and outcomes of convertible-platform total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Methods: A review of the current literature surrounding convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty was completed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of commercially available instrumentation and implant systems as well as their outcomes. Discussion: Leading causes of shoulder arthroplasty revision surgery include glenoid failure, implant instability, and rotator cuff dysfunction. Variations in implant design between inlay and onlay humeral components and metal-backed glenoid components are important considerations at the time of revision surgery. Advantages of convertible-platform systems include increased efficiency and decreased complications during revision procedures as well as shorter recovery, lower cost, and better functional outcomes. Limitations of convertible systems include poorly positioned components during the index procedure, excessive soft-tissue tensioning, and problems associated with metal-backed glenoid implants. Changes in arm length have also been documented. These findings indicate the benefit of additional research and design to improve the effectiveness and utility of convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty systems.

The impact of mental health conditions on clinical and functional outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) has been shown to improve quality of life, though outcomes may vary between individuals. Multiple factors may affect outcomes, including preoperative mental health conditions (MHCs). The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes after SA in patients with MHC compared to patients without MHC. Methods: This systematic review was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines outlined by Cochrane Collaboration. A search of PubMed, the Medline Library, and EMBASE was conducted from inception until September 2023 to obtain studies reporting outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without MHC. Study characteristics and information on clinical and functional outcomes were collected. All included studies were case-control studies. The methodological quality of the included primary studies was appraised using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies scoring. Results: Eleven articles published between 2016 and 2023 met inclusion criteria. In total, 49,187 patients, 49,289 shoulders, and five different MHC were included. 8134 patients in the cohort had a diagnosed MHC. The mean patient age was 67.8 years (range, 63.5-71.6 years), and 52.6% of the patients were female. The mean follow-up time was 35.5 months (range, 16.2-58.3 months). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was the most common type of procedure (25,543 shoulders, 51.8%). Depression and anxiety were the most reported psychiatric diagnoses (7990 patients, 98.2%). Patients with versus without MHC reported mean improvements of 38 and 42 in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and mean Visual Analog Scale pain improvements of 4.7 and 4.9, respectively. Mean complication rates of 31.4% and 14.2% were observed in patients with versus without MHC, respectively. The most prevalent surgical complication in patients with MHC was infection (1.8%), followed by prosthetic complication (1.7%), and adhesive capsulitis (1.6%). Conclusions: Patients with MHC may have lower preoperative range of motion, worse postoperative shoulder function, and higher postoperative pain levels than patients without MHC. Patients with MHC demonstrated improvements in range of motion and functional outcomes after SA but had higher reported complication and revision rates when compared to patients without MHC. Depression and anxiety were the leading conditions correlated with lower outcomes in patients with MHC after SA. Preoperative physical therapy, mental health counseling, and expectation setting may help these patients reach the maximal achievable benefit from SA.

Systematic review on the incidence, operative treatments, and outcomes of deltoid ruptures.

Background: A deltoid rupture can result in significant losses of shoulder function, and in the setting of a rotator cuff tear, the deltoid serves as the sole abductor of the shoulder. Deltoid ruptures can be secondary to trauma, a consequence of massive rotator cuff tears, or a result of postoperative complications. There is a paucity of literature on the management of deltoid ruptures. In this systematic review, we aim to report on the incidence of deltoid ruptures, the surgical treatment options, and the outcomes following operative treatment. Methods: A literature search was conducted on February 1, 2023 on MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and the full text versions of articles that met criteria were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion included peer-reviewed studies evaluating the outcomes following surgical treatment of deltoid ruptures (direct repair, mobilization, reconstruction, and pedicled pectoralis transfer, with or without a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). Secondary outcomes included incidence and causes of deltoid ruptures. Results: A total of 101 studies were retrieved. After review and additional studies identified from reference lists, a total of 14 studies were included in the review. The incidence of deltoid ruptures ranged from 0.3% to 7%, and large, full-thickness rotator cuff tears were found to be a significant risk factor. Surgical treatment options for deltoid ruptures include direct repair, rotationplasty, and pedicelled muscle-tendon transfers; and when indicated, these procedures can be paired with a reverse total shoulder replacement. Postoperatively, the operative extremity should be immobilized in the position of least tension (forward flexion and abduction, 30°-70°) for 4-8 weeks. Most patients in this systematic review who underwent surgical treatment of their deltoid rupture had significant improvements in pain and mean postoperative forward elevation and abduction above 90°. Discussion: The current available literature demonstrates that direct deltoid repair, rotationplasty, or reconstruction (muscle tendon transfer) with or without a concomitant reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can be an acceptable treatment option in patients with deltoid defects and massive rotator cuff tear. The average shoulder flexion and abduction increased postoperatively with improvements in pain.

Tendon transfers in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Tendon transfers in conjunction with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can significantly improve functional outcomes in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff deficiency. There have been multiple promising new techniques described within the last 20 years that shoulder surgeons should become familiar with. Methods: The authors reviewed the literature on tendon transfers in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Procedures to restore various shoulder functions were described including surgical anatomy, techniques, pearls and pitfalls, and photos. Results: Subscapularis insufficiency can be reconstructed with a pectoralis major transfer or latissimus dorsi transfer, with the latter having better clinical outcomes and a more anatomic line of pull. Posterosuperior rotator cuff deficiency can be reconstructed with a latissimus transfer (L'Episcopo transfer) or lower trapezius transfer, with the latter proving superior in biomechanical and short-term studies. Deltoid deficiency can be reconstructed with a pedicled upper pectoralis major transfer. Massive proximal humerus bone loss can be reconstructed with an allograft-prosthetic composite, and any of the aforementioned transfers can be utilized in this setting as well. Conclusion: Tendon transfers in conjunction with reverse shoulder arthroplasty can significantly improve functional outcomes in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff deficiency. There have been multiple promising new techniques described within the last 20 years that shoulder surgeons should become familiar with.

Comparison of short- and mid-term outcomes in patients following ream-and-run and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) may not be an ideal treatment option for young and active patients due to potential activity restriction and concerns about glenoid loosening. The Ream-and-run (RnR) allows for the continuance of high-level activity without concerns of a glenoid component failure. Initial RnR publications are promising though more outcomes studies are needed. Therefore, our primary purpose was to compare outcomes at multiple timepoints between matched aTSA and RnR cohorts. Secondarily, we sought to examine relationships between patient-reported outcomes and preoperative glenoid pathoanatomy in our RnR cohort. Lastly, we examined postoperative radiographs to determine if the RnR successfully corrected glenoid pathoanatomy and humeral head decentering. METHODS: We performed a retrospective matched-cohort study comparing patients who underwent a RnR versus patients who underwent the aTSA procedure between 2017-2019. All patients had primary diagnoses of shoulder osteoarthritis and a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and daily and worst pain outcomes were compared between groups at 3- and 6-months, and 1- and 2-years post-arthroplasty. Pre- and Postoperative glenoid anatomy and humeral decentering were measured radiographically, and correlation analyses were conducted to explore relationships between these factors and 2-year pain and function scores. RESULTS: Forty-six shoulders (23 RnR/ 23aTSA) belonging to 43 male patients with an average age of 56.2±8.3 were included. Eighteen matched pairs were available at 3- and 6- months, 21 matched pairs at 1 year, and all 23 matched pairs at the 2-year timepoint. RnR patients reported significantly higher daily pain ratings (P = .047) and lower ASES scores (P = .031) compared to the aTSA group 3 months after arthroplasty but reported similar outcomes at 6 months and beyond. Preoperative pathoantatomy outcomes were not directly related to final reported pain or function in RnR group. Additionally, the RnR was able to correct posterior humeral head decentering in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Young male patients undergoing RnR can likely expect similar short-term results as young male patients who undergo aTSA. Additionally, the RnR outcomes were not affected by preoperative glenoid wear or humeral head decentering. Our findings support the RnR as a viable surgical alternative for young, active patients with shoulder arthritis.

OpenSim Moco tracking simulations efficiently replicate predictive simulation results across morphologically diverse shoulder models.

OpenSim Moco enables solving for an optimal motion using Predictive and Tracking simulations. However, Predictive simulations are computationally prohibitive, and the efficacy of Tracking in deviating from its reference is unclear. This study compares Tracking and Predictive approaches applied to the generation of morphology-specific motion in statistically-derived musculoskeletal shoulder models. The signal analysis software, CORA, determined mean correlation ratings between Tracking and Predictive solutions of 0.91 ± 0.06 and 0.91 ± 0.07 for lateral and forward-reaching tasks. Additionally, Tracking provided computational speed-up of 6-8 times. Therefore, Tracking is an efficient approach that yields results equivalent to Predictive, facilitating future large-scale modelling studies.