Heart rate reactivity, recovery, and endurance of the incremental shuttle walk test in patients prone to heart failure.

AIMS: Few randomized trials assessed the changes over time in the chronotropic heart rate (HR) reactivity (CHR), HR recovery (HRR) and exercise endurance (EE) in response to the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT). We addressed this issue by analysing the open HOMAGE (Heart OMics in Aging) trial. METHODS: In HOMAGE, 527 patients prone to heart failure were randomized to usual treatment with or without spironolactone (25-50 mg/day). The current sub-study included 113 controls and 114 patients assigned spironolactone (~70% on beta-blockers), who all completed the ISWT at baseline and at Months 1 and 9. Within-group changes over time (follow-up minus baseline) and between-group differences at each time point (spironolactone minus control) were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA, unadjusted or adjusted for sex, age and body mass index, and additionally for baseline for testing 1 and 9 month data. RESULTS: Irrespective of randomization, the resting HR and CHR did not change from baseline to follow-up, with the exception of a small decrease in the HR immediately post-exercise (-3.11 b.p.m.) in controls at Month 9. In within-group analyses, HR decline over the 5 min post-exercise followed a slightly lower course at the 1 month visit in controls and at the 9 month visits in both groups, but not at the 1 month visit in the spironolactone group. Compared with baseline, EE increased by two to three shuttles at Months 1 and 9 in the spironolactone group but remained unchanged in the control group. In the between-group analyses, irrespective of adjustment, there were no HR differences at any time point from rest up to 5 min post-exercise or in EE. Subgroup analyses by sex or categorized by the medians of age, left ventricular ejection fraction or glomerular filtration rate were confirmatory. Combining baseline and Months 1 and 9 data in both treatment groups, the resting HR, CHR and HRR at 1 and 5 min averaged 61.5, 20.0, 9.07 and 13.8 b.p.m. and EE 48.3 shuttles. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone on top of usual treatment compared with usual treatment alone did not change resting HR, CHR, HRR and EE in response to ISWT. Beta-blockade might have concealed the effects of spironolactone. The current findings demonstrate that the ISWT, already used in a wide variety of pathological conditions, is a practical instrument to measure symptom-limited exercise capacity in patients prone to developing heart failure because of coronary heart disease.

To evaluate hypertrichosis with low dose oral minoxidil and spironolactone combination therapy for alopecia.

Low dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) is an efficacious and safe treatment for alopecia, however, a notable side effect is hypertrichosis. Spironolactone, known for treating hirsutism, is also used off-label for the treatment of certain forms of alopecia and may reduce LDOM-induced hypertrichosis. We performed a retrospective review of 54 patients seen at NYU Langone Health and compared hypertrichosis rates in female alopecia patients on LDOM monotherapy versus those on combination therapy with spironolactone. Among 54 patients, 37 received LDOM alone and 17 received the combination. Hypertrichosis developed in 33.3% of patients, with lower rates in the combination group (17.6% vs. 40.5% for monotherapy). Although not statistically significant, the trend suggests spironolactone may mitigate hypertrichosis. The study highlights the potential of combination therapy to address hypertrichosis and calls for larger studies to confirm these findings.

Case report: A pregnant woman accidental treated with spironolactone in mid-gestation.

Spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic, is used to treat hypertension, heart failure, and certain hyperandrogenic disorders. Its use during pregnancy is not recommended due to the risk of feminizing male fetuses, primarily because of its antiandrogenic activity. However, human data remain scarce and largely inconclusive. Here, we present the first case of a 25-year-old pregnant woman, at 16 weeks of gestation, who was inadvertently exposed to spironolactone (240 mg/day) for 1 week due to a pharmacy dispensing error. The patient subsequently delivered a healthy male infant with normal genitalia at 38 weeks of gestation following vaginal delivery. Current follow-up shows that the infant is healthy and developing normally. This article summarizes the potential causes of spironolactone-induced anomalous genital development and explores the safety of new-generation mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) during pregnancy. The mechanisms behind spironolactone-induced anomalous genital development in male fetuses have not been fully elucidated. Spironolactone competes with dihydrotestosterone for binding to androgen receptors and inhibits enzymes involved in androgen biosynthesis, which may partly explain its antiandrogenic effects. Recent advancements in MRAs have led to the development of compounds with higher selectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, thereby reducing the incidence of antiandrogen side effects. These new-generation MRAs may be effective alternatives during pregnancy, but more data are needed to establish their safety in pregnant women. This case contributes to the limited but growing body of literature on the safety profile of spironolactone in pregnancy, providing insights into its effects during a critical period of fetal development.

Efficacy of spironolactone in treating hidradenitis suppurativa in women of childbearing age: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease characterized by recurrent nodules that affect areas with a high density of apocrine sweat glands, such as the axillae and groin. Androgens are implicated in the pathophysiology of HS. Therefore, spironolactone, an antiandrogen therapy, is recommended. However, data on its use in women of childbearing age are limited, especially since its antiandrogenic effects may affect menstruation, fertility, and pubertal development. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of spironolactone in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa in women of childbearing age and to identify factors associated with treatment response. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on female patients aged 12 to 50 with HS treated with spironolactone at Michigan Medicine dermatology clinics from 2000 to 2021. The patients' demographic data, HS characteristics, and spironolactone responses were examined. Statistical assessments were performed to determine the efficacy indicators. Results: Of the 157 patients reviewed, 31 showed an improvement in treatment. Variables such as axillary involvement, previous treatment failures, and use of intralesional steroids were linked to a lack of improvement in spironolactone. Through adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis, a significant association was observed between improvement status and Hurley stage 3 (odds ratio = 0.15 [95% CI: 0.02-0.79], P = .036), suggesting that patients with Hurley stage 3 were 85% less likely to exhibit improvement in spironolactone therapy. Limitations: The study's retrospective nature and reliance on single-center data can limit generalizability. The sample size is limited and therefore affects the study's statistical power. Conclusion: Thus, spironolactone may offer therapeutic benefits for HS in women of childbearing age. However, patients with severe disease (Hurley stage 3) had reduced response rates. Further prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings and determine the most suitable patient profile for spironolactone therapy for HS.

The Global Burden of Resistant Hypertension and Potential Treatment Options.

Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that remains .140 mmHg or .90 mmHg, respectively, despite an appropriate lifestyle and the use of optimal or maximally tolerated doses of a three-drug combination, including a diuretic. This definition encompasses the category of controlled RH, defined as the presence of blood pressure (BP) effectively controlled by four or more antihypertensive agents, as well as refractory hypertension, referred to as uncontrolled BP despite five or more drugs of different classes, including a diuretic. To confirm RH presence, various causes of pseudo-resistant hypertension (such as improper BP measurement techniques and poor medication adherence) and secondary hypertension must be ruled out. Inadequate BP control should be confirmed by out-of-office BP measurement. RH affects about 5% of the hypertensive population and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Once RH presence is confirmed, patient evaluation includes identification of contributing factors such as lifestyle issues or interfering drugs/substances and assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage. Management of RH comprises lifestyle interventions and optimisation of current medication therapy. Additional drugs should be introduced sequentially if BP remains uncontrolled and renal denervation can be considered as an additional treatment option. However, achieving optimal BP control remains challenging in this setting. This review aims to provide an overview of RH, including its epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, as well as the latest therapeutic developments.

Spironolactone Reduces the Risk of Death in Veterans With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome increasing in prevalence and affecting millions worldwide but with limited evidence-based therapies. Results from explanatory clinical trials suggest that spironolactone may help to improve outcomes in patients with HFpEF. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of spironolactone in reducing death and hospitalization outcomes for patients with HFpEF in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used electronic health records from the US Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system between 2002 and 2012 to identify patients with HFpEF who were followed longitudinally through 2014 using a validated algorithm. Among our HFpEF cohort that is 96% men, 85% White individuals, and aged 74±11 years, 3690 spironolactone users and 49 191 nonusers were identified and followed for a median of 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.4) and 3.3 (IQR, 1.6-5.9) years, respectively. We evaluated the effect of spironolactone use on all-cause death and number of days hospitalized per year for heart failure or for any cause by fitting generalized estimating equation-based Poisson and negative binomial models. Crude rates of 10.3 versus 13.5 deaths and 394.0 versus 485.9 days hospitalized were observed per 100 person-years for spironolactone users versus nonusers, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 21% reduction (95% CI, 13-29; P<0.0001) in rate of all-cause death among spironolactone users compared with nonusers and no statistically significant difference in days hospitalized for all causes or heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world national cohort of patients with HFpEF, spironolactone use reduced all-cause death and demonstrated a favorable trend in reducing the burden of hospitalizations.

Challenges in designing a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial for treatment of acne: The SD-ACNE trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Excessive use of antibiotics has led to development of antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-associated complications. Dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per clinician than any other major specialty, with much of this use for acne. Alternative acne treatments are available but are used much less often than antibiotics, at least partially because dermatologists feel that they are less effective. Spironolactone, a hormonal therapy with antiandrogen effects that can address the hormonal pathogenesis of acne, may represent a therapeutic alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne. However, the comparative effects of spironolactone and oral antibiotics in the treatment of acne have not been definitively studied. The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation (SD-ACNE) trial aims to answer whether spironolactone, in addition to standard topical therapy, is noninferior to doxycycline (an oral antibiotic) for women with acne. Several interesting challenges arose in the development of this study, including determining acceptability of the comparative regimens to participating dermatologists, identifying data to support a noninferiority margin, and establishing a process for unblinding participants after they completed the study while maintaining the blind for study investigators. METHODS: We present the scientific and clinical rationale for the decisions made in the design of the trial, including input from key stakeholders through a Delphi consensus process. RESULTS: The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial (NCT04582383) is being conducted at a range of community and academic sites in the United States. To maximize external validity and inform clinical practice, the study is designed with broad eligibility criteria and no prohibition of use of topical medications. Participants in the trial will be randomized to receive either spironolactone 100 mg/day or doxycycline hyclate 100 mg/day for 16 weeks. The primary outcome is the absolute decrease in inflammatory lesion count, and we have established a noninferiority margin of four inflammatory lesions. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of participants achieving Investigator Global Assessment success, change in quality of life, and microbiome changes and diversity. CONCLUSIONS: The Spironolactone versus Doxycycline for Acne: A Comparative Effectiveness, Noninferiority Evaluation trial will have substantial implications for the treatment of acne and antibiotic stewardship. In addition, this study will provide important information on the effect of these systemic agents on the development of changes to the microbiome and antibiotic resistance in a healthy population of patients.

The efficacy of and user satisfaction with different antiandrogens in Chinese transgender women.

Objective: Cyproterone acetate (CPA) and spironolactone (SPL) are different antiandrogens in gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women. Few studies have evaluated their efficacy and user satisfaction, especially among East Asians. This study aimed to evaluate these aspects in Chinese transgender women. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from transgender women visiting the Peking University Third Hospital from 2012 to 2021. From 639 people identified as transgender women, 151 of them (80 using CPA and 71 using SPL, 16 to 40-year-old) under stable GAHT ≥6 months were enrolled. Total testosterone levels and visual analogue scale (VAS)-based satisfaction scores were evaluated. Results: No difference was observed in age between the CPA and SPL groups (median [IQR], 22 [20-24] years and 23 [20-26] years, respectively). The duration of GAHT was longer in CPA group than in SPL group (18 [10-32] months vs. 12 [8-21] months, p = 0.009). Total testosterone levels were significantly lower with CPA treatment (25 mg/d) than with SPL treatment (100 mg/d) (median [IQR]: 0.7 [0.7-2.1] nmol/L vs. 13.0 [6.0-17.8] nmol/L, p < 0.001). The proportion of total testosterone levels reaching the recommended range was significantly higher in CPA group than in SPL group (75.0% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001). VAS-based satisfaction scores for erection decreased and figure feminization were higher in CPA group than in SPL group, which remained unchanged after adjusting for age, treatment duration, estradiol dose, and comorbid mental disorders (p < 0.05). The prolactin levels were higher in CPA group than in SPL group (18.9 [11.8-28.1] ng/ml vs. 11.8 [7.9-18.4] ng/ml, p < 0.001). No severe safety events were reported in both groups. Conclusion: In Chinese transgender women, CPA was more effective than SPL in lowering testosterone levels. Additionally, VAS scores indicated greater satisfaction with erection decreased and figure feminization using CPA compared to SPL.

Spironolactone use and oocyte maturation in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between spironolactone use and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study, including patients who underwent COH. Oocyte yield and maturation rates were compared by categories of spironolactone use at the start of their cycle. RESULTS: 402 patients were included. 83 patients continued spironolactone, 44 patients discontinued spironolactone, and 275 matched control patients were spironolactone-naïve. No difference was observed in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 15 ± 13, p = 0.4) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 12 ± 11, p = 0.4) in patients who continued spironolactone use and spironolactone naïve patients, respectively. When comparing patients who continued spironolactone use and patients who discontinued spironolactone use, no difference was seen in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 17.5 ± 7.8, p = 0.9) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 13.5 ± 6.5, p = 0.5), respectively. There was no observed relationship between total daily spironolactone dose (< 100mg/day, 100mg/day, 150mg/day and > 200 mg/day) and the total number of mature oocytes vitrified (respectively, 14.0 ± 13.0, 16.0 ± 7.8, 14.0 ± 4.5, 11.0 ± 7.0 oocytes, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between spironolactone and oocyte yield and maturation rates during COH cycles. These findings can assist in counseling patients on the implications of continuing spironolactone during COH cycle.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on new-onset or recurrent atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Background Clinical and translational research suggests that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may prevent atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to consolidate existing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of MRAs on incident or recurrent AF. Methods Medline, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched until February 12, 2024. Triple-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using both pairwise and Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses. Results Twenty-three RCTs (13,358 participants) were identified. Based on the pairwise random effects meta-analysis, MRAs were associated with a significant reduction in AF events compared to placebo or usual care (risk ratio {RR}= 0.75; 95% confidence interval {CI}= [0.66, 0.87]; P< 0.001; I2= 3%). This protective effect was robust both for new-onset and recurrent AF episodes (subgroup p-value= 0.69), while the baseline HF status was not a significant effect modifier (subgroup p-value= 0.58). MRAs demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in AF events for patients with chronic renal disease compared to placebo (RR= 0.78; 95% CI= [0.62, 0.98]; P= 0.03; I2= 0%). The network meta-analyses revealed that only spironolactone was associated with a significant reduction in AF events (Bayesian RR= 0.76; 95% CI= [0.65, 0.89]; P< 0.001; level of evidence moderate; SUCRA 0.731), while eplerenone and finerenone showed a neutral effect. Conclusion MRAs confer a significant benefit in terms of reducing incident or recurrent AF episodes, irrespective of HF status. In this context, spironolactone may be preferable compared to eplerenone or finerenone.

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Estradiol Regimens in Transgender Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: A goal of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women is to use estradiol to suppress endogenous production of testosterone. However, the effects of different estradiol regimens and route of administration on testosterone suppression is unknown. This is the first open-label randomized trial comparing different GAHT regimens for optimal estradiol route and dosing. Objective: To evaluate 1 month and 6 months testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL with pulsed (once- or twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol) and continuous (transdermal 17-beta estradiol) GAHT. Methods: This study was conducted at an outpatient adult transgender clinic. Thirty-nine transgender women undergoing initiation of GAHT were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily sublingual, twice-daily sublingual, or transdermal 17-beta estradiol. All participants received spironolactone as an antiandrogen. Doses were titrated at monthly intervals to achieve total testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL. Results: Transdermal 17-beta estradiol resulted in more rapid suppression of total testosterone, lower estrone levels, with no differences in estradiol levels when compared to once-daily and twice-daily sublingual estradiol. Moreover, there was no difference in the mean estradiol dose between the once-daily and twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol group. Conclusion: Continuous exposure with transdermal 17-beta estradiol suppressed testosterone production more effectively and with lower overall estradiol doses relative to once or twice daily sublingual estradiol. Most transgender women achieved cisgender women testosterone levels within 2 months on 1 or 2 0.1 mg/24 hours estradiol patches. Given no difference between once- or twice-daily sublingual estradiol, pulsed 17-beta estradiol likely provides no benefit for testosterone suppression.

Effects of Combined Low-Dose Spironolactone Plus Vitamin E versus Vitamin E Monotherapy on Lipidomic Profile in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Objectives: Lipid dysmetabolism seems to contribute to the development and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Our aim was to compare serum lipidomic profile between patients with NAFLD having received monotherapy with vitamin E (400 IU/d) and those having received combination therapy with vitamin E (400 IU/d) and low-dose spironolactone (25 mg/d) for 52 weeks. Methods: This was a post hoc study of a randomized controlled trial (NCT01147523). Serum lipidomic analysis was performed in vitamin E monotherapy group (n = 15) and spironolactone plus vitamin E combination therapy group (n = 12). We employed an untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry lipid profiling approach in positive and negative ionization mode. Results: Univariate analysis revealed 36 lipid molecules statistically different between groups in positive mode and seven molecules in negative mode. Multivariate analysis in negative mode identified six lipid molecules that remained robustly different between groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, including gender, omega-3 supplementation, leptin concentration and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), four lipid molecules remained significant between groups: FA 20:5, SM 34:2;O2, SM 42:3;O2 and CE 22:6, all being higher in the combination treatment group. Conclusions: The combination of spironolactone with vitamin E led to higher circulating levels of four lipid molecules than vitamin E monotherapy, after adjustment for potential confounders. Owing to very limited relevant data, we could not support that these changes in lipid molecules may be beneficial or not for the progression of NAFLD. Thus, mechanistic studies are warranted to clarify the potential clinical significance of these findings.

Increased Spironolactone Dosing in Acute Heart Failure Alters Potassium Homeostasis but Does not Enhance Decongestion.

BACKGROUND: The ATHENA-HF (Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure) clinical trial found no improvements in natriuretic peptide levels or clinical congestion when spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours was used in addition to usual treatment for acute heart failure. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of ATHENA-HF to determine whether spironolactone treatment induced any detectable pharmacodynamic effects and whether patients with potentially greater aldosterone activity experienced additional decongestion. Trial subjects previously treated with spironolactone were excluded. We first examined for changes in renal potassium handling. Using the baseline serum potassium level as a surrogate marker of spironolactone activity, we then divided each treatment arm into tertiles of baseline serum potassium and explored for differences in laboratory and clinical congestion outcomes. RESULTS: Among spironolactone-naïve patients, the change in serum potassium did not differ after 24 hours or 48 hours but was significantly greater with spironolactone treatment compared to placebo at 72 hours (0.23 ± 0.55 vs 0.03 ± 0.60 mEq/L; P = 0.042) and 96 hours (0.32 ± 0.51 vs 0.13 ± 0.72 mEq/L; P = 0.046). Potassium supplementation was similar at treatment start and at 24 hours, but spironolactone-treated patients required substantially less potassium replacement at 48 hours (24% vs 36%; P = 0.048), 72 hours (21% vs 37%; P = 0.013), and 96 hours (11% vs 38%; P < 0.001). When the treatment arms were divided into tertiles of baseline serum potassium, there were no differences in the 96-hour log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, net fluid loss, urine output, or dyspnea relief in any of the potassium groups, with no effect modification by treatment exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone 100 mg/day for 96 hours in patients receiving intravenous loop diuresis for acute heart failure has no clear added decongestive ability but does meaningfully limit potassium wasting.

Effectiveness of Spironolactone in Reducing Osteoporosis and Future Fracture Risk in Middle-Aged and Elderly Hypertensive Patients.

Objective: While the role of aldosterone in bone metabolism is well established, the specific effects of the widely used aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, on bone health are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of spironolactone on osteoporosis and future fracture risk in middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients, revealing its potential benefits for bone health. Methods: Propensity score matching was employed in this study to create matched groups of spironolactone users and non-users at a 1:4 ratio. We investigated the association between spironolactone use and the risk of osteoporosis using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we conducted multivariate linear regression analysis to explore the relationship between cumulative dosage and the FRAX score. Subgroup analysis was also performed to assess the effects under different stratification conditions. Results: In both pre-match and post-match analyses, multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant reduction in the risk of osteoporosis in the spironolactone usage group (pre-match: odds ratios [OR] 0.406, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.280-0.588; post-match: OR 0.385, 95% CI, 0.259-0.571). Furthermore, post-match multivariable linear regression demonstrated a clear negative correlation between cumulative spironolactone dosage and the FRAX score. Subgroup analyses consistently supported these findings. Conclusion: This study offers evidence supporting the significant positive impact of the antihypertensive drug spironolactone on bone health, resulting in a substantial reduction in the risk of osteoporosis and future fractures in hypertensive patients. Future research should consider conducting large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to further investigate the long-term effects of spironolactone on bone health in hypertensive patients.

Diuretic effects of Hecogenin and Hecogenin acetate via aldosterone synthase inhibition.

Hecogenin (HEC) is a steroidal saponin found in many plant species and serves as a precursor for steroidal drugs. The diuretic effects of HEC and its derivative, hecogenin acetate (HA), remain largely unexplored. The present study aimed to explore the potential diuretic effects of HEC and HA compared to furosemide (FUR) and spironolactone (SPIR). Additionally, the study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism particularly focusing on aldosterone synthase gene expression. Fifty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated into nine groups (Group 1-9). Group 1 (control) received the vehicle, Groups 2 received FUR 10 mg/kg, Group 3, 4, and 5 were given HEC, while Groups 6, 7 and 8 received HA i.p at doses of 5, 10, and 25 mg/kg, respectively. Group 9 received SPIR i.p at the dose of 25 mg/kg. Urine volume, diuretic index and diuretic activity were monitored at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 24 h post-administration. Treatment was given daily for seven days. After that, rats were sacrificed and blood was collected for serum electrolytes determination. Adrenal glands were dissected out for gene expression studies. The results revealed that HEC and HA at the administered doses significantly and dose-dependently increased urine and electrolyte excretion. These results were primarily observed at 25 mg/kg of each compound. Gene expression studies demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in aldosterone synthase gene expression, suggesting aldosterone synthesis inhibition as a potential mechanism for their diuretic activity. Notably, HA exhibited more pronounced diuretic effects surpassing those of HEC. This enhanced diuretic activity of HA can be attributed to its stronger impact on aldosterone synthase inhibition. These findings offer valuable insights into the diuretic effects of both HEC and HA along with their underlying molecular mechanisms.

Long-term trajectory of renal dysfunction and related risk factors in patients with apparently treatment-resistant and non-resistant arterial hypertension.

Objectives: Evidence suggests that renal function increasingly deteriorates in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH) in comparison with those who have non-resistant arterial hypertension (NAH). We aimed to assess the long-term decline in renal function between these patient groups and identify specific risk factors contributing to the progression of renal dysfunction. Methods: Data for 265 patients with ATRH and NAH in a hypertension excellence centre were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, laboratory findings, secondary causes of hypertension, medication and exposure to contrast agents were assessed. To address differences between groups, adjustment with linear mixed-effect models was used. Results: Data from the first 4 years of follow-up were evaluated. After adjustment for age and diabetes, which were identified as independent risk factors for renal dysfunction progression in the study cohort, the mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate per year was steeper with ATRH than with NAH (-1.49 vs. -0.65 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; difference in slope, 0.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.41, p = 0.005). In subgroup analyses, without Holm-Bonferroni correction, the prescription of MRA indicated a faster decline in renal function in ATRH. Following correction, no specific therapeutic risk factor was associated with faster progression of renal dysfunction. Conclusions: Renal function declines twice as fast with ATRH compared with NAH, independently of age and diabetes. Larger studies are needed to reveal risk factors for renal dysfunction in patients with hypertension.

High blood pressure (arterial hypertension) is a significant risk factor for kidney function decline. Resistant hypertension represents a subtype of hypertension that is difficult to treat and requires multiple antihypertensive agents to achieve effective blood pressure control. Recent research suggests that individuals with resistant hypertension are at greater risk of kidney dysfunction.This study analyses data from adult patients with arterial hypertension and resistant hypertension followed-up for a mean duration of 6.4 years.A faster decline in kidney function was observed in patients with resistant hypertension. This suggests that renal function in these patients should be closely monitored.After statistical evaluation, no medication was found to be associated with an increased risk of kidney failure progression. However, two specific medications, spironolactone and eplerenone, raised suspicion and require further exploration in larger prospective studies.

Management of androgenic alopecia: a systematic review of the literature.

We aimed to determine the efficacy of the various available oral, topical, and procedural treatment options for hair loss in individuals with androgenic alopecia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the National Library of Medicine was performed. Overall, 141 unique studies met our inclusion criteria. We demonstrate that many over the counter (e.g. topical minoxidil, supplements, low-level light treatment), prescription (e.g. oral minoxidil, finasteride, dutasteride), and procedural (e.g. platelet-rich plasma, fractionated lasers, hair transplantation) treatments successfully promote hair growth, highlighting the superiority of a multifaceted and individualized approach to management.

Safety of Antiandrogens for the Treatment of Female Androgenetic Alopecia with Respect to Gynecologic Malignancies.

The most common type of alopecia in women is female androgenetic alopecia (FAGA), characterized by progressive hair loss in a patterned distribution. Many oral therapies, including spironolactone (an aldosterone antagonist), androgen receptor blockers (e.g., flutamide/bicalutamide), 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride/dutasteride), and oral contraceptives, target the mechanism of androgen conversion and binding to its respective receptor and therefore could be administered for the treatment of FAGA. Despite significant advances in the oral treatment of FAGA, its management in patients with a history of gynecological malignancies, the most common cancers in women worldwide, may still be a concern. In this review, we focus on the safety of antiandrogens for the treatment of FAGA patients. For this purpose, a targeted literature review was conducted on PubMed, utilizing the relevant search terms. To sum up, spironolactone seems to be safe for the systemic treatment of FAGA, even in high-risk populations. However, a general uncertainty remains regarding the safety of other medications in patients with a history of gynecologic malignancies, and further studies are needed to evaluate their long-term safety in patients with FAGA and risk factors to establish an optimal risk assessment and treatment selection protocol.