Long-term follow-up of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: Natural course of pure, heterogeneous, and real part-solid ground-glass nodules.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested the applicability of three classifications of subsolid nodules (SSNs). However, few studies have unraveled the natural history of the three types of SSNs. METHODS: A retrospective study from two medical centers between November 2007 and November 2017 was conducted to explore the long-term follow-up results of three different types of SSNs, which were divided into pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs), heterogeneous ground-glass nodules (hGGNs), and real part-solid nodules (rPSNs). RESULTS: A total of 306 consecutive patients, including 361 SSNs with long-term follow-up, were reviewed. The median growth times of pGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs were 7.7, 6.0, and 2.0 years, respectively. For pGGNs, the median period of development into rPSNs was 4.6 years, while that of hGGNs was 1.8 years, and the time from pGGNs to hGGNs was 3.1 years (p < 0.05). In SSNs with an initial lung window consolidation tumor ratio (LW-CTR) >0.5 and mediastinum window (MW)-CTR >0.2, all cases with growth were identified within 5 years. Meanwhile, in SSNs whose LW-CTR and MW-CTR were 0, it took over 5 years to detect nodular growth. Pathologically, 90.6% of initial SSNs with LW-CTR >0 were invasive carcinomas (invasive adenocarcinoma and micro-invasive adenocarcinoma). Among patients with rPSNs in the initial state, 100.0% of the final pathological results were invasive carcinoma. Cox regression showed that age (p = 0.038), initial maximal diameter (p < 0.001), and LW-CTR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for SSN growth. CONCLUSIONS: pGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs have significantly different natural histories. Age, initial nodule diameter, and LW-CTR are important risk factors for SSN growth.

Quantitative evaluation of density variability in the lesion-lung boundary zone to differentiate pulmonary subsolid nodules.

Background: Transition of the CT values from nodule to peripheral normal lung is related to pathological changes and may be a potential indicator for differential diagnosis. This study investigated the significance of the standard deviation (SD) values in the lesion-lung boundary zone when differentiating between benign and neoplastic subsolid nodules (SSNs). Methods: From January 2012 to July 2021, a total of 229 neoplastic and 84 benign SSNs confirmed by pathological examination were retrospectively and nonconsecutively enrolled in this study. The diagnostic study was not registered with a clinical trial platform, and the study protocol was not published. Computed tomography (CT) values of the ground-glass component (CT1), adjacent normal lung tissue (CT2), and lesion-lung boundary zone (CT3) were measured consecutively. The SD of CT3 was recorded to assess density variability. The CT1, CT2, CT3, and SD values were compared between benign and neoplastic SSNs. Results: No significant differences in CT1 and CT2 were observed between benign and neoplastic SSNs (each P value >0.05). CT3 (-736.1±51.0 vs. -792.6±73.9; P<0.001) and its SD (135.6±29.6 vs. 83.6±20.6; P<0.001) in neoplastic SSNs were significantly higher than those in benign SSNs. Moreover, the SD increased with the invasiveness degree of neoplastic SSNs (r=0.657; P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that the area under the curve was 0.927 (95% CI: 0.896-0.959) when using the SD (cutoff value =106.98) as a factor to distinguish SSNs, which increased to 0.966 (95% CI: 0.934-0.985) when including nodules with a CT1 of ≥-715 Hounsfield units (HU) only (cutoff of SD 109.9, sensitivity 0.930, and specificity 0.914). Conclusions: The SD as an objective index is valuable for differentiating SSNs, especially for those with a CT1 of ≥-715 HU, which have a higher possibility of neoplasm if the SD is >109.9.

Implementation of artificial intelligence in the histological assessment of pulmonary subsolid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Clinical management of subsolid nodules (SSNs) is defined by the suspicion of tumor invasiveness. We sought to develop an artificial intelligent (AI) algorithm for invasiveness assessment of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as radiological SSNs. We investigated the performance of this algorithm in classification of SSNs related to invasiveness. METHODS: A retrospective chest computed tomography (CT) dataset of 1,589 SSNs was constructed to develop (85%) and internally test (15%) the proposed AI diagnostic tool, SSNet. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in the hold-out test set and was further tested in an external cohort of 102 SSNs. Three thoracic surgeons and three radiologists were required to evaluate the invasiveness of SSNs on both test datasets to investigate the clinical utility of the proposed SSNet. RESULTS: In the differentiation of invasive adenocarcinoma (IA), SSNet achieved a similar area under the curve [AUC; 0.914, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.813-0.987] with that of the 6 doctors (0.900, 95% CI: 0.867-0.922). When interpreting with the assistance of SSNet, the sensitivity of junior doctors, specificity of senior doctor, and their accuracy were significantly improved. In the external test, SSNet (AUC: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.884-1.000) achieved a better AUC than doctors (AUC: 0.883, 95% CI: 0.826-0.939) whose AUC increased (AUC: 0.908, 95% CI: 0.847-0.982) with SSNet assistance. In the histological subtype classifications, SSNet achieved better performance than practicing doctors. The AUCs of doctors were significantly improved with the assistance of SSNet in both 4-category and 3-category classifications to 0.836 (95% CI: 0.811-0.862) and 0.852 (95% CI: 0.825-0.882), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AI diagnostic system achieved non-inferior performance to doctors, and will potentially improve diagnostic performance and efficiency in SSN evaluation.

Predicting malignancy: subsolid nodules detected on LDCT in a surgical cohort of East Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: Due to widespread use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, increasing number of patients are found to have subsolid nodules (SSNs). The management of SSNs is a clinical challenge and primarily depends on CT imaging. We seek to identify risk factors that may help clinicians determine an optimal course of management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics of 83 SSN lesions, including 48 pure ground-glass nodules and 35 part-solid nodules, collected from 83 patients who underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: Of the 83 SSNs, 16 (19.28%) were benign and 67 (80.72%) were malignant, including 23 adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), 16 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA), and 28 invasive adenocarcinomas (IA). Malignant lesions were found to have significantly larger diameters (P<0.05) with an optimal cut-off point of 9.24 mm. Significant indicators of malignancy include female sex (P<0.05), air bronchograms (P<0.001), spiculation (P<0.05), pleural tail sign (P<0.05), and lobulation (P<0.05). When compared with AIS/MIA combined, IA lesions were found to be larger (P<0.05) with an optimal cut-off of 12 mm, and have a higher percentage of part-solid nodules (P<0.001), pleural tail sign (P<0.001), air bronchograms (P<0.05), and lobulation (P<0.05). Further multivariate analysis found that lesion size and spiculation were independent factors for malignancy while part-solid nodules were associated with IA histology. CONCLUSIONS: East Asian females are at risk of presenting with a malignant lesion even without history of heavy smoking or old age. Nodule features associated with malignancy include larger size, air bronchograms, lobulation, pleural tail sign, spiculation, and solid components. A combination of patient characteristic and LDCT features can be effectively used to guide management of patients with SSNs.