Greater tuberosity morphology is altered in individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tendon tears.

BACKGROUND: In the presence of an isolated supraspinatus tear, the force applied to the greater tuberosity is reduced, which may lead to bony morphologic changes. Thus, diagnostic or surgical identification of landmarks to properly repair the torn tendon might be difficult if the anatomy of the greater tuberosity is altered. The objectives of the study were to assess the presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets of the greater tuberosity in individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tendon tears and the associations between tear size, tear location and presence of each facet. METHODS: Thirty-seven individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tendon tears were recruited to participate in the study. Individuals underwent a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the involved shoulder and images were segmented to generate subject specific models of each humerus. The vertices comprising each facet were identified; however, if even a single vertex comprising the facet was missing, the facet was considered altered. Percentage agreement for correctly identifying the presence of each facet was determined using 2 additional observers and 5 randomly selected humeri. Ultrasonography was performed to assess anterior-posterior (AP) tear size and tear location. Outcome parameters included presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets; AP tear size; and tear location. Point-biserial correlations were used to determine the associations between AP tear size, tear location, and presence of the superior, middle, and inferior facets. RESULTS: Supraspinatus tear size and tear location was 13.1 ± 6.1 mm (range, 1.9-28.3 mm) and 2.0 ± 4.4 mm from the posterior edge of the long head of the biceps tendon (range, 0.0-19.0 mm), respectively. Overall, the superior, middle, and inferior facets were not altered in 24.3%, 29.7%, and 45.9% of individuals, respectively. Percentage agreement between observers was 83.4% on average. No associations were found between tear size or tear location and presence of the superior, middle, or inferior facet (P values ranged from .19 to .74). CONCLUSION: Individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears experience significant alterations in the bony morphology of the greater tuberosity that were irrespective of supraspinatus tear size and location. This information is useful for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons as the altered anatomy may influence the ability to identify important anatomic landmarks during diagnostic imaging or surgical procedures.

Axial superior facet slope may determine anterior or posterior atlantoaxial displacement secondary to os odontoideum and compensatory mechanisms of the atlantooccipital joint and subaxial cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce novel parameters in determining directions of os odontoideum (OO) with atlantoaxial displacement (AAD) and compensations of cervical sagittal alignment after displacement. METHODS: Analysis was performed on 96 cases receiving surgeries for upper cervical myelopathy caused by OO with AAD from 2011 to 2021. Twenty-four patients were included in the OO group and divided into the OO-anterior displacement (AD) group and the OO-posterior displacement (PD) group by displacement. Seventy-two patients were included as the control (Ctrl) group and divided into Ctrl-positive (Ctrl-P) group and Ctrl-negative (Ctrl-N) group by axial superior facet slope (ASFS) in a neutral position. ASFS, the sum of C2 slope (C2S) and axial superior facet endplate angle (ASFEA), was measured and calculated by combining cervical supine CT with standing X-ray. Cervical sagittal parameters were measured to analyse the atlantoaxial facet and compensations after AAD. RESULTS: Atlas inferior facet angle (AIFA), ASFS, and ASFEA in Ctrl-P significantly differed from OO-AD.C0-C1, C1-C2, C0-C2, C2-C7, C2-C7 SVA, and C2S in Ctrl-P significant differed from the OO-AD group. C2-C7 SVA and C2S in Ctrl-N significantly were smaller than the OO-PD group. C1-C2 correlated with C0-C1 and C2-C7 negatively in the OO group. Slight kyphosis of C1-C2 in OO-AD was compared with lordosis of C1-C2 in Ctrl-P, inducing increased extension of C0-C1 and C2-C7. Mildly increased lordosis of C1-C2 in OO-PD was compared with C1-C2 in Ctrl-N, triggering augmented flexion of C0-C1 and C2-C7. CONCLUSION: ASFS was vital in determining directions of OO with AAD and explaining compensations. ASFS and ASFEA could provide pre- and intraoperative guidelines. KEY POINTS: • ASFS may determine the directions and compensatory mechanisms of AAD secondary to OO. • ASFS could be achieved by the sum of ASFEA and C2S.

The biomechanical effect on the adjacent L4/L5 segment of S1 superior facet arthroplasty: a finite element analysis for the male spine.

BACKGROUND: The superior facet arthroplasty is important for intervertebral foramen microscopy. To our knowledge, there is no study about the postoperative biomechanics of adjacent L4/L5 segments after different methods of S1 superior facet arthroplasty. To evaluate the effect of S1 superior facet arthroplasty on lumbar range of motion and disc stress of adjacent segment (L4/L5) under the intervertebral foraminoplasty. METHODS: Eight finite element models (FEMs) of lumbosacral vertebrae (L4/S) had been established and validated. The S1 superior facet arthroplasty was simulated with different methods. Then, the models were imported into Nastran software after optimization; 500 N preload was imposed on the L4 superior endplate, and 10 N⋅m was given to simulate flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation. The range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral disc stress of the L4-L5 spine were recorded. RESULTS: The ROM and disc stress of L4/L5 increased with the increasing of the proportions of S1 superior facet arthroplasty. Compared with the normal model, the ROM of L4/L5 significantly increased in most directions of motion when S1 superior facet formed greater than 3/5 from the ventral to the dorsal or 2/5 from the apex to the base. The disc stress of L4/L5 significantly increased in most directions of motion when S1 superior facet formed greater than 3/5 from the ventral to the dorsal or 1/5 from the apex to the base. CONCLUSION: In this study, the ROM and disc stress of L4/L5 were affected by the unilateral S1 superior facet arthroplasty. It is suggested that the forming range from the ventral to the dorsal should be less than 3/5 of the S1 upper facet joint. It is not recommended to form from apex to base. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Investigation of the "Superior Facet Rule" Using 3D-Printed Thoracic Vertebrae With Simulated Corticocancellous Interface.

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw placement is the most common method of fixation in the thoracic spine. Use of the "superior facet rule" allows the operator to locate the borders of the pedicle reliably using posterior landmarks alone. This study investigated the ability of 3-dimensionally (3D)-printed thoracic vertebrae, made from combined thermoplastic polymers, to demonstrate pedicle screw cannulation accurately using the superior facet as a reliable landmark. METHODS: An anonymized computed tomography scan of the thoracic spine was obtained. The T1-T12 thoracic vertebrae were anatomically segmented and 3D-printed. The pedicle diameters and distance from the midpoint of the superior facet to the ventral lamina were recorded. A total of 120 thoracic pedicles in 60 thoracic vertebral models were instrumented using a freehand technique based only on posterior landmarks. The vertebral models were then coronally cut and examined for medial or lateral violations of the pedicle after screw placement. RESULTS: A total of 120 pedicle screws were placed successfully within the 3D-printed thoracic vertebral models. Average measurements fell within 1 standard deviation of previous population studies. There were no pedicle wall violations using standard posterior element landmarks for instrumentation. There were 3 lateral violations of the vertebral body wall during screw placement, all attributable to the insertion technique. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed thoracic vertebral models using combined thermoplastic polymers can accurately demonstrate the anatomical ultrastructure and posterior element relationships of the superior facet rule for safe thoracic pedicle screw placement. This method of vertebral model prototyping could prove useful for surgical education and demonstrating spinal anatomy.

The ventral lamina and superior facet rule: a morphometric analysis for an ideal thoracic pedicle screw starting point.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: With the increasing popularity of thoracic pedicle screws, the freehand technique has been espoused to be safe and effective. However, there is currently no objective, definable landmark to assist with freehand insertion of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. With our own increasing surgical experience, we have noted a reproducible and unique anatomic structure known as the ventral lamina. PURPOSE: We set out to define the morphologic relationship of the ventral lamina to the superior articular facet (SAF) and pedicle, and describe an optimal medial-lateral pedicle screw starting point in the thoracic spine. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an in vitro fresh-frozen human cadaveric study. METHODS: One hundred fifteen thoracic spine vertebral levels were evaluated. After the vertebral body was removed, Kirschner wires were inserted retrograde along the four boundaries of the pedicle. Using digital calipers, we measured width of the SAF and pedicle at the isthmus, and from the borders of the SAF to the boundaries of the pedicle. We calculated the morphologic relationship of the ventral lamina and the center of the pedicle (COP) to the SAF. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine pedicles were measured, with one pedicle excluded because of fracture of the SAF during disarticulation. The ventral lamina was clearly identifiable at all levels, forming the roof of the spinal canal and confluent with the medial pedicle wall (MPW). The mean distance from the SAF midline to the MPW was 1.36±1.23 mm medial. The MPW was lateral to SAF midline in 34 pedicles (14.85%) and, on average, was a distance of 0.52±0.51 mm lateral. The mean distance from the SAF midline to the COP was 2.17±1.38 mm lateral. The COP was medial to SAF midline in only 11 pedicles (4.80%). CONCLUSIONS: The ventral lamina is an anatomically reproducible structure located consistently medial to the SAF midline (85%). We also found the COP consistently lateral to the SAF midline (95%). Based on these morphologic findings, the medial-lateral starting point for thoracic pedicle screws should be 2 to 3 mm lateral to the SAF midline (superior facet rule), allowing screw placement in the COP and avoiding penetration into the spinal canal.

Superior Facet Syndrome: Case Report

The intense radicular pain of sciatica caused by a herniated disc is familiar. That similar symptoms may result from nerve root entrapment in a stenotic lateral vertebral recess without discal herniation is less well known and its possibility should be considered in the patients with root pain. We recently experienced a case of superior facet syndrome in a 57 years old female with intense sciatic pain. On operation, the right L-5 root was found to be entrapped in a stenotic lateral recess beneath the superior articular facet of the L-5 vertebra. There was no evidence of a herniated disc. The result was clinically excellent with surgical unroofing of the lateral recess with removal of the overhanging horizontal portion of the superior facet, L-5 vertebra of right.