Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Blocks and Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injections for Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The current mainstream treatment for frozen shoulder is a combination of physiotherapy and intraarticular corticosteroid injections (IACIs). Recently, the ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has developed as a notable alternative option to the mainstream treatment. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare ultrasound-guided SSNBs' effectiveness to IACIs' as treatments for frozen shoulder. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted as a prospective single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. METHODS: Patients with frozen shoulder (n = 76) were enrolled as participants and allocated to either an SSNB group (n = 38) or an IACI group (n = 38). Both groups received 2 injections of 20 mg of triamcinolone and 3 mL of 1% lidocaine at 2-week intervals and underwent the same physiotherapy protocol for 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The secondary outcome measures were the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), the active and passive range of motion (ROM) of each patient's affected shoulder, and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment. RESULTS: Both groups achieved significant improvements in all outcome measures, except the general health subscale of the SF-36 at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment. For time and group interaction, the results for the SDQ (P = .047) and SF-36 (bodily pain, P = .025) indicated significant differences that favored IACIs. Additionally, the IACI group achieved more favorable outcomes than did the SSNB group on the SPADI (P = .094) and in ROM (i.e., abduction [P = .190] and external rotation [P = .081]) as well as on 2 subscales of the SF-36: bodily pain (P = .059) and role-emotional (P = .072). LIMITATIONS: Our study is limited by the lack of participant stratification based on the stages of frozen shoulder and the 12-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of ultrasound-guided IACIs and physiotherapy should be attempted first as a frozen shoulder treatment.

The suprascapular nerve block (SScNB) is easily administered using a landmark-based technique: A cadaveric study to assess nerve staining post-injection.

Aims: The suprascapular nerve is an ideal target for nerve blockade to alleviate shoulder pain given its widespread innervation to the shoulder girdle. To widen availability of this treatment, we investigate whether an anatomical landmark technique can be adopted by novice injectors to provide efficacious blockade. Methods: Five injectors were recruited with varying experience. 10 shoulders of Thiel embalmed cadavers were injected with blue dye. Written instructions and an illustration of the Dangoisse landmark technique were provided prior to injection. Cadavers were dissected and the presence or absence of dye staining reported by three observers and a consensus agreement reached. Results: Dissection demonstrated diffuse staining in the suprascapular fossa. 90% of shoulders had adequate staining of the suprascapular nerve directly, or distal branches, which would provide adequate anaesthesia. Inter-observer agreement was good (k = 0.73) for staining at the supraspinous fossa and excellent (k = 0.87) for staining distally. The technique was performed by novice injectors with a good success rate. Conclusion: This technique is reproducible by a range of clinicians to effectively provide anaesthesia of the SScN. Within a resource strained healthcare environment greater uptake of this technique is likely to be of benefit to a wider group of patients.

Efficacy of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Alone Versus Combination With Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgeries: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial.

Background and aim The regional anesthesia technique is commonly used for upper extremity surgery as an alternative to general anesthesia. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) and a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block with suprascapular nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing shoulder surgeries. Method A total of 62 patients of both sexes with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II/III, aged between 18 and 65 years, and undergoing shoulder surgery, were included in this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were equally allocated into two groups: 31 in group A and 31 in group B. After pre-anesthetic evaluation, the purpose and protocol of the study were explained to patients, and informed consent was obtained. Thirty-one patients in group A were given infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine while 31 patients in group B were given a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine and suprascapular nerve block using 5 ml 0.375% bupivacaine. Blocks were given using ultrasound guidance and a peripheral nerve stimulator; the suprascapular block was given in the sitting position while the infraclavicular block was provided in the supine position. General anesthesia was administered in the operation theatre in the supine position after the administration of blocks. The pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the satisfaction score was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS). The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of pain between the two groups. The chi-square test was utilized for comparing the categorical variables. Result The postoperative pain was significantly lower (p<0.001) in group B as compared to group A at all the periods of observation, i.e., 0h (2.77±0.72 vs. 5.42±0.77), 6h (3.89±0.70 vs. 5.94±0.73), 12h (5.66±0.93 vs. 6.58±0.88), and 24h (6.16±0.80 vs. 6.74±0.90). These findings illustrate that group B patients who received a combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block for shoulder surgeries had better pain relief than group A patients who received only the infraclavicular approach. The mean NRS score of patient satisfaction in group B (7.26±0.58) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in comparison to group A (6.16±0.64). Diaphragmatic palsy was observed in only one case in group A and none in group B. No other complication was observed in any of the patients during the study period. Conclusion The combination of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block displays a positive postoperative analgesic profile with less usage of rescue analgesic doses and better patient satisfaction after shoulder surgery.

Comparison of Spinoglenoid Versus Suprascapular Notch Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Distal Suprascapular Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Distal suprascapular nerve blocks (SSNB) can be performed at the level of the suprascapular notch (the preferred site) or at the level of the spinoglenoid notch. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of spinoglenoid versus suprascapular notch approaches for ultrasound (US)-guided distal SSNB in patients with chronic shoulder pain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic of a tertiary center. METHODS: Eighty patients with chronic unilateral shoulder pain were included in this study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (SSNB at the level of the spinoglenoid notch) and group 2 (SSNB at the level of the suprascapular notch). The patients were evaluated for pain according to the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and a secondary visual analog scale (VAS), as well as for the outcome measures of range of motion (ROM) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) at baseline and at one, 4, and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement was observed in the SPADI and VAS scores and ROM measurements, and the PPT measurements were similar at all post-injection follow-ups in both groups. Changes in outcome measures were similar between the groups, except for some ROM measurements at the post-injection follow-ups. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of shoulder pain etiologies. CONCLUSION: Both distal SSNB approaches significantly improved pain and disability scores in patients with chronic shoulder pain, with no observable differences in the short-to-medium term. SSNB performed at the level of the spinoglenoid notch is therefore not inferior in efficacy and safety to SSNB performed at the level of the suprascapular notch.

A Randomized Comparison Between Interscalene and Combined Interscalene-Suprascapular Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Background: To compare the analgesic effect of ISB with a combination of ISB-SSNB and patients who were given opioids with PCA without block in adult patients undergoing shoulder surgery, as measured by opioid consumption and pain intensity in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Methods: Ninety patients who underwent shoulder surgery were randomly divided into three groups. Group I in which ISB was performed and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was inserted, Group II with; ISB and SSNB combined, and PCA was inserted, and Group III where; only PCA was used. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at the second, fourth, sixth, 12th, and 24th hours, morphine consumption, additional analgesic requirement, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: Compared with Group III, the VAS pain score was significantly lower in Group I and Group II at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. In Group I, the VAS score at rest at the 6th hour was found to be higher than in Group II. The 24-hour total morphine consumption was higher in the control group than in Group I and Group II. The satisfaction score of the control group was lower than Group I and Group II. Conclusion: The combined application of ISB and SSNB block is beneficial in shoulder surgery to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption. Level of Evidence: Level I; Randomized Controlled Trial; Treatment Study.

Variability in the distance between the suprascapular notch with the spine of the scapulae and the acromion.

INTRODUCTION: The suprascapular notch lies in the superior border of the scapula and is a passageway for the suprascapular nerve that is sensory to the shoulder joint. Suprascapular nerve block involves injection of local anaesthetic into the suprascapular notch, either ultrasound guided or blind, using the spine of scapula and/or the medial border of the acromion as surface landmarks. AIM: To investigate the anatomic variations that exist between the distance of the notch from the spine of scapula and acromion. METHOD: Ninety-two dry scapulae were measured with a digital calliper for their length of the spine, distance between the midpoint of the spine and base of the suprascapular notch and distance between the medial border of the acromion and the base of the suprascapular notch. These measurements were compared for variations in the scapular bony landmarks, the spine and the acromion to determine the site for the injection. RESULTS: Measurement reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation, Cronbach's alpha being 0.99, 0.97 and 0.91 for length of spine, distance from spine and distance from acromion respectively. The distance from the acromion had less variation in measurement (3.73 ± 0.42 cm) but a flatter distribution when compared to distance from the spine of the scapula (3.32 ± 0.39 cm). CONCLUSION: Length of the spine of the scapula appeared not to influence either distance from the acromion or distance from the spine of scapula. There is potential for greater variability in placement of nerve blocks that use acromion as the bony reference. Key Points • Dry scapular measurement using electronic Vernier callipers is accurate (0.91-0.97). • There is potential for greater variability in placement of blind nerve blocks that use acromion as the bony reference to locate the suprascapular notch.

Continuous suprascapular nerve blockade to potentiate intensive rehabilitation for refractory adhesive shoulder capsulitis: a cohort study.

PURPOSE: Evaluating the short- and long-term efficacy of a continuous ten day suprascapular nerve block combined with daily multidisciplinary rehabilitation on shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, and function in patients with refractory adhesive capsulitis (AC). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to a specialized pain clinic for refractory AC for more than 6 months underwent continuous suprascapular nerve blockade for ten days and received 2 hours of physiotherapy and occupational therapy daily. Standardized assessments were performed at baseline, at days three, six, ten, 30, 90, and 180, and included active and passive ROM measurements, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire to assess pain, disability, and quality of life. Improvements over time were assessed using ANOVAs. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were followed (age: 52 ± 8 years, 25 females, mean symptoms duration of two years). There was a significant improvement in ROM for all amplitudes at day ten (short-term; range: 20-35°, p < 0.001) and at day 180 (long-term; range: 18-47°, p < 0.001). The pain and disability scores significantly reduced by day 180 (mean VAS reduction: 2.6 units, p < 0.001; mean DASH reduction: 9.5 points, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Continuous SSNB combined with intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation represents an efficient therapeutic option for patients with chronic AC who did not respond to conventional treatments.

Combined Infraclavicular-Suprascapular Nerve Blocks Compared With Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, and Comparative Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard postoperative analgesia protocol for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures is the interscalene block (ISB), which prevents the significant consequences of phrenic nerve block associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). The infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) combined with the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) had the same analgesic efficacy as the infraclavicular BPB alone, with no effect on respiration. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the study aimed to assess the HDP and analgesic efficacy of both approaches in controlling pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and comparative clinical trial. SETTING: The study comprised 66 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 33 patients each: the ISB group and the costoclavicular and suprascapular block (CSB) group. METHODS: The ISB group obtained the ISB followed by the general anesthesia. The CSB group received infraclavicular blockade using the costoclavicular approach and SSNB followed by general anesthesia. RESULTS: Considering morphine utilization during the first day following the operation, the groups demonstrated an insignificant difference. The CSB group showed a decreased rate of diaphragmatic paralysis. LIMITATIONS: There was no control group. And, the blocks might take a long time to be performed up to 30 minutes. Also, there were no validated criteria to define HDP based on M-mode ultrasound measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of the costoclavicular block in combination with the suprascapular block may provide a comparable analgesic potency to the sole use of the standard ISB with no HDP.

The Median Effective Volume of 0.375% Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-guided Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is an important nerve that contributes to shoulder joint sensation and movement. The anterior suprascapular nerve block (aSSNB) has the potential for noninferior analgesic effect compared with the interscalene block while preserving respiratory function. This study investigated the median effective volume (MEV) of 0.375% ropivacaine in aSSNB for analgesic effect among patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was the MEV. The secondary objectives included the 24 hour sufentanil consumption, 24 hour patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) presses, and incidences of diaphragm impairment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective registered (ChiCTR2300070129), single-armed, volume-finding study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a tertiary, single center. METHODS: There were 23 patients who completed the study. Using an up-and-down process, patients enrolled in the study received different volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine for an aSSNB adjusted based on the success or failure of the previous patient in the study's block by increasing or decreasing the volume by 3 mL. The first patient received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine. The nerve blocks were evaluated by the sensory score of the C5 and C6 dermatomes. RESULTS: MEV50 (50% of the patients) was 6 mL (95% CI, 5.78 - 6.78 mL), and MEV95 (95% of the patients) was 13.88 mL (95% CI, 13.37 - 14.87 mL). There was no significant difference in the PCA presses, 24 hour sufentanil consumption, and incidences of diaphragm impairments between successful and unsuccessful blocks. LIMITATIONS: Our study focused on the analgesic effect rather than hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis with 0.375% ropivacaine for an aSSNB. The study also did not test varying ropivacaine concentrations while keeping the volume constant. Further investigation with varying concentrations and a larger sample size is indicated to address the optimal volume and concentration to balance analgesia and diaphragm function. CONCLUSIONS: To produce effective analgesic effect, the MEV50 is 6 mL, and the MEV95 is 13.88 mL in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery who receive an aSSNB using 0.375% ropivacaine for analgesia.

Anesthetic management of scapular Y-osteotomy using a combination of suprascapular nerve block and erector spinae plane block for Sprengel deformity associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) occurs in 1/40,000 individuals and is characterized by cervical fusion. Thirty percent of patients with KFS present with Sprengel deformity, leading to orthopedic problems and limited shoulder abduction. No reports exist regarding anesthetic procedures for pediatric scapular osteotomies. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 4-year-and-7-month-old boy (95.6 cm, 14.7 kg) who underwent left scapular osteotomy. At the age of 8 months, he also underwent a right lower lobectomy due to a congenital pulmonary airway malformation. We decided to use a combination of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and general anesthesia. He received regular acetaminophen administration and fentanyl 5-10 µg/hour intravenously until 20 h postoperatively and remained on ≤ 2/10 in the Wong-Baker Face Scale (0: no hurt; 10: hurts worst). CONCLUSION: The combination of SSNB and ESPB could be an option for perioperative analgesia for scapular osteotomies.

Suprascapular Nerve Block (SSNB) improves the outcome in exercise based management of Primary Adhesive Capsulitis (PAC): A prospective randomized comparative study.

Background and Aims: Increased pain and associated stiffness hinders the advantages of exercise and process of recovery in primary adhesive capsulitis. We hypothesized that suprascapular nerve block may positively affect the outcome due to its role in pain relief of acute or chronic shoulder pain. We compared the effect of suprascapular nerve block and exercise with only exercise on the recovery of primary adhesive capsulitis. Material and Methods: A total of 96 patients of both sexes presenting with primary adhesive capsulitis were divided by computer randomization in two equal groups (n = 48). Group A received exercise only and Group B received suprascapular nerve block followed by exercise. Oral paracetamol was given for analgesia as desired. Patients were followed up at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale; functional outcome by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and range of movement by goniometer. Results: The pain scores and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were significantly lower at all observation points of 4, 8,16, and 24 weeks in Group B than Group A (P < 0.05). The range of movement in all the ranges of forward flexion, extension, internal and external rotation, and abduction at all observation points was significantly higher in Group-B (P < 0.05) compared to Group A. The consumption of analgesics was significantly more in Group A than Group B at 4 and 8 weeks (P = 0.020 and P = 0.044) but comparable at 12 and 24 weeks (P = 0.145 and P = 0.237 respectively). Conclusion: Combining SSNB with exercise is more effective in treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis than exercise alone and reduces the use of analgesics. SSNB it is effective and safe to use in primary adhesive capsulitis.

Suprascapular nerve block is faster and as effective as hydrodistension in relieving frozen shoulder-associated pain and disability: A prospective, single-blind observational study with a follow-up of 24 weeks.

Background and Aims: Hydrodistension (HD) and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) have been shown to reduce pain and improve shoulder function in frozen shoulder (FS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HD and SSNB in the treatment of idiopathic FS. Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. A total of 65 patients with FS were treated with SSNB or HD. The functional outcome was evaluated by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score and active shoulder range of motion (ROM) measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Parametric data were analyzed using an independent sample T-test. Nonparametric data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Result: At the end of 24 weeks, the two-group improved significantly from the baseline and the improvement was comparable between the two groups. ROM also improved significantly in both groups. At 2nd week, SPADI score was significantly less in SSNB group (P < 0.05). About 43% of patients considered HD extremely painful. Conclusion: Both HD and SSNB are almost equally effective in reducing pain and improving shoulder function. However, SSNB leads to a faster improvement.

Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Block at Suprascapular Notch-Do We Really Target Suprascapular Notch or Not? Where Is Our Real Target?

Ultrasound (US)-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a widely used procedure and while describing the US-guided SSNB in the suprascapular notch, the suprascapular fossa is often visualized and injection is performed in that location. Although it can be done in both location, to inject the right area, the terminology should be settled and the visualization of these areas which are unclear and confusing in the literature should be clarified. In this sense, we showed the course of the nerve on a cadaver and briefly describe a protocol to correctly visualize the suprascapular notch with US.

Efficacy of surgeon-directed suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks in shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-arm prospective randomized controlled trial.

Background: The use of regional anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy improves perioperative pain control, thereby reducing the need for opioids and their recognized side effects. Occasionally one type of block is not suitable for a patient's anatomy or comorbidities or requires a specially trained anesthetist to safely perform. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of 3 different nerve blocks for pain management in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. Methods: A 3-arm, blinded, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective, unilateral shoulder arthroscopic procedures between August 2018 and November 2020 was conducted at a single center. One hundred and thirty participants were randomized into 1 of 3 regional anesthesia techniques. The first group received an ultrasound-guided interscalene block performed by an anesthetist (US + ISB). The second group received an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block by an anesthetist (US + SSANB). The final group received a suprascapular nerve block without ultrasound and an axillary nerve block under arthroscopic guidance by an orthopedic surgeon (A + SSANB). Intraoperative pain response, analgesia requirements, and side effects were recorded. Visual analogue pain scores and opioid doses were recorded in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and daily for 8 days following the procedure. Results: Twelve patients withdrew from the study after randomization, leaving 39 participants in US + ISB, 40 in US + SSANB, and 39 in A + SSANB. The US + ISB group required significantly lower intraoperative opioid doses than US + SSANB and A + SSANB (P < .001) and postoperatively in PACU (P < .001). After discharge from hospital, there were no differences between all groups in daily analgesia requirements (P = .063). There was significantly more nerve complications with 6 patient-reported complications in the US + ISB group (P = .02). There were no reported differences in satisfaction rates between groups (P = .41); however, the A + SSANB group was more likely to report a wish to not have a regional anesthetic again (P = .04). Conclusion: The US + ISB group required lower opioid doses perioperatively; however, there was no difference between groups after discharge from PACU. The analgesia requirements between the US + SSANB and A + SSANB were similar intraoperatively and postoperatively. A surgeon-administered SSANB may be a viable alternative when an experienced regional anesthetist is not available.

Efficacy of Phrenic Nerve Block and Suprascapular Nerve Block in Amelioration of Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain after Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) is a common complication after thoracic surgery. Severe ISP can cause ineffective breathing and impair shoulder mobilization. Both phrenic nerve block (PNB) and suprascapular nerve block (SNB) are anesthetic interventions; however, it remains unclear which intervention is most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of PNB and SNB for the prevention and reduction of the severity of ISP following thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Materials and methods: Studies published in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library without language restriction were reviewed from the publication's inception through 30 September 2022. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the comparative efficacy of PNB and SNB on ISP management were selected. A network meta-analysis was applied to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of 381 records screened, eight studies were eligible. PNB was shown to significantly lower the risk of ISP during the 24 h period after surgery compared to placebo (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58) and SNB (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.64). PNB significantly reduced the severity of ISP during the 24 h period after thoracic surgery (WMD -1.75, 95% CI -3.47 to -0.04), but these effects of PNB were not statistically significantly different from SNB. When compared to placebo, SNB did not significantly reduce the incidence or severity of ISP during the 24 h period after surgery. Conclusion: This study suggests that PNB ranks first for prevention and reduction of ISP severity during the first 24 h after thoracic surgery. SNB was considered the worst intervention for ISP management. No evidence indicated that PNB was associated with a significant impairment of postoperative ventilatory status.

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block with suprascapular nerve block alone in patients with frozen shoulder: A prospective, double-blinded randomized, single-centre trial.

Background: Frozen shoulder is a troublesome disease of the shoulder joint. It leads to marked disability because of pain with restriction of active and passive movement of the joint. We aimed to determine and compare the efficacy of combined suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks with suprascapular nerve block alone for the treatment of frozen shoulder pain. Methodology: A total of 61 patients with frozen shoulder included in the study underwent ultrasound-guided combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block (n â€‹= â€‹31) and suprascapular nerve block (n â€‹= â€‹30). All the patients were assessed for visual analogue scale (VAS) pain (0-10), simple pain score (0-5), total pain score (0-9), range of motion (abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) of the affected shoulder joint at baseline and post-procedure at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Result: There was a significant improvement in VAS pain score, simple pain scores, total pain scores and range of motion of the affected shoulder joint in both groups at all time points as compared to the baseline. However, in the combined nerve block group the VAS scores, simple and total pain scores, abduction, and internal rotation were significantly better at 6 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusion: The combined block provided faster and superior pain relief and improvement in function.

Continuous Suprascapular Catheter and Axillary Nerve Block for Analgesia for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a widely employed surgical intervention for managing advanced shoulder arthritis. Postoperatively, patients frequently experience intense pain, particularly within the first 48 hours. Effective pain management through regional analgesia not only facilitates a quicker hospital discharge but also minimizes the reliance on opioids. One such regional analgesic approach is the combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block, which targets the glenohumeral joint, rotator cuff muscles, and the shoulder's lateral region for effective pain alleviation. Previous research indicates that this dual nerve block method offers sustained pain relief while circumventing the respiratory complications commonly associated with interscalene brachial plexus blocks, which may inadvertently block the phrenic nerve and affect respiration. We report the case of a 75-year-old female, diagnosed with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis on multiple inhalers, who presented for RTSA. The patient had a strong desire to avoid opioids for pain control due to adverse side effects. Through a suprascapular nerve catheter and axillary nerve single shot, regional analgesia was administered, which minimized the risk of respiratory complications due to potential phrenic nerve involvement from an interscalene approach. There were no opioids taken in the postoperative period after discharge, and the patient only received oral acetaminophen. The patient experienced a successful recovery without any respiratory complications and was extremely satisfied with her management.

Regional nerve blocks for relieving postoperative pain in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Rotator cuff tear is the most common cause of shoulder pain in middle-age and older people. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is the most common treatment method for rotator cuff tear. Early postoperative pain after ARCR is the primary concern for surgeons and patients and can affect postoperative rehabilitation, satisfaction, recovery, and hospital day. There are numerous methods for controlling postoperative pain including patient-controlled analgesia, opioid, interscalene block, and local anesthesia. Regional blocks including interscalene nerve block, suprascapular nerve block, and axillary nerve block have been successfully and commonly used. There is no difference between interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in pain control and opioid consumption. However, SSNB has fewer complications and can be more easily applied than ISB. Combination of axillary nerve block with SSNB has a stronger analgesic effect than SSNB alone. These regional blocks can be helpful for postoperative pain control within 48 hours after ARCR surgery.

The Minimum Effective Analgesic Volume of 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Suprascapular Nerve Block.

Objective The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBB) constitutes the gold standard for analgesia after shoulder procedures. Ipsilateral phrenic nerve block remains the most common adverse effect after ISBB. Alternative nerve blocks are performed in shoulder surgery in order to prevent hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the minimum effective local anesthetic volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia with an anterior suprascapular nerve block (ASSB). The secondary aim was to investigate diaphragm functions with the local anesthetic doses used while conducting effective volume research. Method This prospective observational study was conducted at the American Hospital of Istanbul, Turkey, from March to July 2022. The initial injected volume of 0.5% bupivacaine was 10 ml. Our clinical experience indicates that this yields a complete sensory block of the anterior suprascapular nerve. In accordance with the up-and-down method, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine used for a particular patient was determined by the outcome of the preceding block, which represented block success. In case of effective ASSB being achieved, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine to be administered to the next patient was lowered by 1 ml. In case of block failure, however, the volume of 0.5% bupivacaine to be applied in the subsequent case was increased by 1 ml. Ipsilateral hemi-diaphragmatic movement measurements were taken before (baseline) and 30 minutes after the block. General anesthesia was induced 60 minutes after the completion of the block performance by means of a standardized protocol. Results Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The ED50 and ED95 calculated for anterior suprascapular nerve block using probit transformation and logistic regression analysis were 2.646 (95% CI, 0.877-2.890) and 3.043 ml (95% CI, 2.771-4.065), respectively. When complete paralysis was defined as 75% or above, partial paralysis as 25-50%, and no paralysis as 25% or less, volumes of 6 ml or lower appeared to cause no paralysis for the anterior suprascapular nerve block. Conclusion We, therefore, recommend using a volume of 6 ml or less in order to achieve diaphragm-sparing features for anterior suprascapular nerve blocks.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block at the Level of the Second Thoracic Vertebra With Suprascapular Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate postoperative pain management in shoulder surgeries is the mainstay of rehabilitation therapy and subsequent improved functional outcomes. However, adequate pain control either with opioids or interscalene brachial plexus block is often challenged by their side effects. In this context, this study compared the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) to the newly emerging erector spinae plane block at the second thoracic vertebral level (high thoracic-ESPB) as an alternative pain therapy. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of high thoracic-ESPB with SSNB as analgesic options for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial. SETTING: This clinical trial was performed at Zagazig University. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04669639, December 15, 2020). Patient enrollment was initiated after the registration date (December 20, 2020), and the study was conducted from December 2020 to November 2021. Ninety-six adult patients who prepared for arthroscopic surgeries were assigned to the high thoracic-ESPB group, SSNB group, and control group; all with 32 patients each. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the control group and block groups concerning the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) at recovery, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively at rest and with shoulder movement. However, the NRS-11 was significantly higher in the SSNB group than in the high thoracic-ESPB group only with movement both at recovery and 2 hours postoperatively. Otherwise, no significant difference between the 2 block groups was found throughout different time points of the study. The doses of fentanyl given intraoperatively were significantly higher in the control group than in the high thoracic-ESPB and SSNB groups (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 326.6 ± 45.8, 224.7 ± 17.1, and 232.8 ± 17.8; P value < 0.001, respectively). A significant difference also was observed concerning postoperative morphine use, where the mean ± SD was 18.8 ± 2.9 in the control group vs 5.7 ± 1.02 and 6 ± 0.81 (P value < 0.001) in the high thoracic-ESPB and SSNB groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: A continuous local anesthetic (LA) infusion catheter can be used either in the high thoracic-ESPB or SSNB to provide extended periods of analgesia. However, our investigation was confined to a single LA injection. CONCLUSIONS: SSNB is not inferior to high thoracic-ESPB in the context of phrenic nerve sparing pain control for arthroscopic surgeries. Moreover, SSNB is a more established technique with more predicted sensory distributions and a lower risk of LA toxicity.