Tactile acuity and active joint repositioning sense in individuals with and without chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor dysfunction, as measured by tactile acuity and active joint repositioning, has been identified as a contributing factor of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Existing research suggests that further research is necessary to improve the characterization of sensorimotor perception in patients with CLBP. OBJECTIVES: The main aim is to investigate whether tactile acuity and repositioning errors differ between individuals with CLBP and controls without CLBP. A secondary aim was to investigate the association between age, body mass index (BMI) and physical activity, and tactile acuity and repositioning sense. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Sixty-eight participants (36 with, 32 without CLBP) were examined. Two-Point Discrimination (TPD) test (four measures: horizontal and vertical run, left and right side) and Active Joint Reposition Sense (AJRS) test (2 directions: to flexion and to extension) were used. RESULTS: No differences were found for TPD (right horizontal run: p = .069; left horizontal run: p = .066; right vertical run: p = .933; left vertical run: p = .285) or AJRS (flexion: p = .792; extension: p = .956) between participants with and without CLBP. Older subjects had significantly worse tactile acuity (3 sites, p = .018, p = .004, p = .041) and worse repositioning sense (2 directions, p = .026, p = .040,) than younger subjects. Individuals with BMI ≥ 25 had significantly worse TPD compared to individuals with normal weight (2 sites, p = .028, p = .020). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CLBP did not have impaired tactile and repositioning accuracy when compared to controls without CLBP. Future studies comparing sensorimotor performance should consider age and BMI as potential confounding factors.

Sense of ownership influence on tactile perception: Is the predictive coding account valid for the somatic rubber hand Illusion?

According to the predictive coding account, the attenuation of tactile perception on the hand exposed to the visuo-tactile Rubber Hand Illusion (vtRHI) relies on a weight increase of visual information deriving from the fake hand and a weight decrease of tactile information deriving from the individual's hand. To explore if this diametrical modulation persists in the absence of vision when adopting the somatic RHI (sRHI), we recorded tactile acuity measures before and after both RHI paradigms in 31 healthy individuals, hypothesizing a weight decrease for somatosensory information deriving from the hand undergoing the illusion and a weight increase for those deriving from the contralateral hand in the sRHI. Our results showed a significant overall decrease in tactile acuity on the hand undergoing the illusion whilst no changes emerged on the contralateral hand during sRHI. Since the sRHI was not accompanied by the hand spatial remapping, despite the generation of the feeling of ownership toward the fake hand, we hypothesized spatial remapping might play a pivotal role in determining sensory information weight attribution.

Assessment of Temporal Somatosensory Discrimination in Females with Fibromyalgia: Reliability and Discriminative Ability of a New Assessment Tool.

We assessed the test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of a somatosensory temporal discrimination (SSTD) assessment tool for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and determined if pain-related variables were associated with SSTD performance. Twenty-five women with FMS and twenty-five asymptomatic women were assessed during two sessions 7 to 10 days apart. The proportion of correct responses (range 0-100) was calculated. Sociodemographic information was collected for both groups. The participants with FMS also completed the widespread pain index and the Brief Pain Inventory. Test-retest reliability was verified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Discriminative ability was verified by a between-group comparison of scores using a t-test. Associations between SSTD score and pain variables were tested using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. The test-retest reliability of the SSTD score was excellent (ICC > 0.9, CI: 0.79-0.96) for the asymptomatic group and good for the FMS group (ICC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91). The median (Q1-Q3) test session SSTD score differed significantly between the FMS 84.1 (71-88) and the asymptomatic 91.6 (83.4-96.1) groups (p < 0.001). Only pain duration was associated with the SSTD score. In conclusion, the new SSTD test seems reliable for people with FMS and is discriminative. Further studies should examine its sensitivity to change and correlations with other SSTD tests.

Pain symptoms are associated with two-point discrimination threshold in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the associations of orofacial two-point discrimination (2-PD) test result with pain symptoms and psychological factors in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs). METHODS: 193 patients with TMDs were included in this study. Patients' demographics, pain intensity, and psychological status were recorded. The 2-PDs in the bilateral temporal, zygomatic, mandibular, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions of the patients were measured. Statistical analyses were conducted to observe the associations between variables. RESULTS: For Pain-related TMDs (PT) patients, Monthly Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-M) and Current Analogue Scale (VAS-C) were correlated with TMJ, zygomatic and temporal 2-PDs. Patients with PT tended to have higher TMJ 2-PDs[Right: ß = 1.827 mm, 95%CI(0.107, 3.548), P = 0.038], zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: ß = 1.696 mm, 95%CI(0.344, 3.048), P = 0.014], temporal 2-PDs[Left: ß = 2.138 mm, 95%CI(0.127, 4.149), P = 0.037; Right: ß = 1.893 mm, 95%CI(0.011, 3.775), P = 0.049]. Associations were also observed between VAS-C and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: ß = 0.780, 95%CI(0.190, 1.370), P = 0.01; Right: ß = 0.885, 95%CI(0.406, 1.364), P = 0.001], Zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: ß = 0.555, 95%CI(0.172, 0.938), P = 0.005]; VAS-M and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: ß = 0.812, 95%CI(0.313, 1.311), P = 0.002; Right: ß = 0.567, 95%CI(0.152, 0.983), P = 0.008], zygomatic 2-PDs[Left: ß = 0.405, 95%CI(0.075, 0.735), P = 0.016; Right: ß = 0.545, 95%CI(0.221, 0.870), P = 0.001], and temporal 2-PDs [Left: ß = 0.741, 95%CI(0.258, 1.224), P = 0.003; Right: ß = 0.519, 95%CI(0.063, 0.975), P = 0.026]. CONCLUSION: TMJ, zygomatic, and temporal 2-PDs were significantly associated with PT and pain intensity. Age, gender and psychological factors were not associated with orofacial 2-PDs. PT patients exhibited weaker tactile acuity compared to Non-PT patients. Further discussion on the underlying mechanism is needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orofacial tactile acuity of TMDs patients was associated with their pain symptoms, which researchers should take account into when performing 2-PD tests for TMDs patients. The 2-PD test can be considered as a potential tool along with the current procedures for the differentiations of PT and Non-PT.

Tactile localization accuracy at the low back.

Localizing tactile stimulation is an important capability for everyday function and may be impaired in people with persistent pain. This study sought to provide a detailed description of lumbar spine tactile localization accuracy in healthy individuals. Sixty-nine healthy participants estimated where they were touched at nine different points, labelled in a 3 × 3 grid over the lumbar spine. Mislocalization between the perceived and actual stimulus was calculated in horizontal (x) and vertical (y) directions, and a derived hypotenuse (c) mislocalization was calculated to represent the direct distance between perceived and actual points. In the horizontal direction, midline sites had the smallest mislocalization. Participants exhibited greater mislocalization for left- and right-sided sites, perceiving sites more laterally than they actually were. For all vertical values, stimulated sites were perceived lower than reality. A greater inaccuracy was observed in the vertical direction. This study measured tactile localization for the low back utilizing a novel testing method. The large inaccuracies point to a possible distortion in the underlying perceptual maps informing the superficial schema; however, further testing comparing this novel method with an established tactile localization task, such as the point-to-point method, is suggested to confirm these findings.

Toe stimulation improves tactile perception of the genitals.

The human body is represented in a topographic pattern in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and genital representation is displaced below the toe representation. However, the relationship between the representation of the genitals and toe in S1 remains unclear. In this study, tactile stimulation was applied to the big toe in healthy subjects to observe changes in tactile acuity in the unstimulated genital area, abdomen, and metacarpal dorsal. Then tactile stimulation was applied to the right abdomen and metacarpal dorsal to observe changes in tactile acuity in bilateral genitals. The results revealed that tactile stimulation of the big toe led to a reduction in the 2-point discrimination threshold (2PDT) not only in the stimulated big toe but also in the bilateral unstimulated genitals, whereas the bilateral abdomen and metacarpal dorsal threshold remained unchanged. On the other hand, tactile stimulation of the abdomen and metacarpal dorsal did not elicit 2-point discrimination threshold changes in the bilateral genitals. Cortical and subcortical mechanisms have been proposed to account for the findings. One explanation involves the intracortical interaction between 2 adjacent representations. Another possible explanation is that the information content of a specific body part is broadly distributed across the S1. Moreover, exploring the links between human behaviors and changes in the cerebral cortex is of significant importance.

Comparison of tactile acuity between patients with chronic patellofemoral pain with central sensitization and healthy persons: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common multifactorial condition in young and physically active people. OBJECTIVE: The occurrence of central sensitization may play an important role in sensory disturbance. This study was designed to investigate, in patients with chronic PFP, the presence of disturbances in tactile acuity with central sensitization. METHODS: Thirty patients with chronic PFP and 30 matched healthy controls entered this cross-sectional study. Graphesthesia (numerical score), two-point discrimination (mm), and point-to-point sensation (mm) were assessed in all participants. RESULTS: The results of between-group comparisons showed that there were significant differences between the involved knee in patients with chronic PFP and healthy participants in graphesthesia (median = 13 [case], 19 [control]; p < .001), two-point discrimination (median = 25.8 [case], 20.3 [control]; p < .001), and point-to-point sensation (median = 14.5 [case], 6.2 [control]; p < .001). There was also a significant difference in graphesthesia between the non-involved knee in patients with chronic PFP and healthy participants (median = 17 [case], 19 [control]; p = .003). The results of within-group comparisons revealed a significant difference in graphesthesia, two-point discrimination, and point-to-point sensation between the involved and non-involved knee in patients with chronic PFP (p < .001). Moreover, there was a positive correlation between two-point discrimination and pain in patients with chronic PFP (r = 0.446, p = .014). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study reveal that there is a sensory deficit in patients with chronic PFP. Because sensory information is necessary for motor control and pain perception, we can assume that clinical symptoms in these patients are related to sensory deficits.

Inter- and Intra-Examiner Reliability Study of Two-Point Discrimination Test (TPD) and Two-Point Estimation Task (TPE) in the Sacral Area of Pain-Free Individuals.

Tactile acuity is typically measured by a two-point discrimination test (TPD) and a two-point estimation task (TPE). In the back area, they are only conducted in the lumbar and cervical regions of the spine. Considering that such measurements have not been conducted in the sacral regions, the purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the TPD and TPE at the level of the S3 segment. The study included 30 pain-free subjects aged 20-30 years. Tests were performed with a pair of stainless hardened digital calipers. The TPD was measured in two locations: 5 and 15 cm from the midline; for TPE both, points were located inside the measured area. Session 1 involved assessments by two examiners in 10-min intervals. Session 2 was measured by one examiner, at analogous intervals between tests. The TPD inter-rater reliability was excellent for mean measurements (ICC3.2: 0.76-0.8; ICC3.3: 0.8-0.92); the intra-rater reliability was excellent for mean measurements (ICC2.2: 0.79-0.85; ICC2.3: 0.82-0.86). The TPE inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for mean measurements (ICC3.2: 0.65-0.92; ICC3.3: 0.73-0.94); the intra-rater reliability for all studies (ICC2.1, ICC2.2, ICC2.3) was excellent (0.85-0.89). Two measurements are sufficient to achieve good reliability (ICC ≥ 0.75), regardless of the assessed body side.

The perception of pain, discriminative touch and affective touch in patients suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder.

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is often characterized by self-injurious behaviors, with one-half to two-third of these patients reporting hypalgesic or analgesic phenomena during self-harming. Research on pain perception in BPD suggested abnormal processing of nociception either within the sensory-discriminative and/or motivational-affective systems of pain. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether pain insensitivity could be generalized to other somatosensory submodalities. To investigate this question, 30 BPD patients and 30 matched healthy controls were enrolled in the current study and underwent a somatosensory battery composed of well-established psychophysical test assessing all the principal submodalities of somatosensation, namely pain perception (i.e., warm, cold and mechanical), discriminative touch (i.e., tactile acuity and tactile sensitivity) as well as affective touch. Results showed abnormal warm detection threshold, warm pain threshold, mechanical pain perception, and tactile sensitivity in BPD patients, but no differences emerged neither for tactile acuity nor for cold pain thresholds, cold tolerance, or for affective touch perception. Findings point to a deficit in nociception, as well as in tactile sensitivity in BPD individuals, and were discussed in relation to BPD clinical features including self-injurious behaviors.

Tactile acuity and left/right judgment performance in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Left/right judgment task (LRJT) performance and tactile acuity are impaired in chronic pain conditions, however, evidence is limited for knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To compare LRJT performance and the two-point discrimination threshold (TPDT) of chronic knee OA patients with asymptomatic knee and pain-free controls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Fifty knee OA patients and 50 age and gender-matched pain-free controls were assessed using the Recognize® application by displaying knee images and a digital caliper for the TPDT of the medial and lateral knee joint line. RESULTS: TPDTs over the lateral joint line in symptomatic (mean difference [MD]: 13.59 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.72, 18.46; d = 1.40) and asymptomatic knee (MD: 10.15 mm; 95% CI: 5.08, 15.22; d = 0.99) were significantly increased compared to pain-free controls. Similarly, TPDTs of the medial joint line were significantly increased in symptomatic (MD: 12.19 mm; 95% CI: 7.59, 16.79; d = 1.31) and asymptomatic knee (MD: 7.64 mm; 95% CI: 3.64, 11.64; d = 1.31) compared to pain-free controls. Patients with knee OA were less accurate (MD: 7.80%; 95% CI: 15.32, -0.27; d = 0.52) recognizing images of their symptomatic knee. No correlation was found between pain severity, pain duration, LRJT performance, and TPDTs. Post-hoc analysis revealed no differences in LRJT and TPDTs between patients with and without clinically relevant symptoms of central sensitization. CONCLUSION: Chronic knee OA is associated with increased TPDT for medial and lateral knee joint lines and decreased recognition accuracy performance which should be considered during treatment process.

A Novel Tactile Function Assessment Using a Miniature Tactile Stimulator.

Several methods for the measurement of tactile acuity have been devised previously, but unexpected nonspatial cues and intensive manual skill requirements compromise measurement accuracy. Therefore, we must urgently develop an automated, accurate, and noninvasive method for assessing tactile acuity. The present study develops a novel method applying a robotic tactile stimulator to automatically measure tactile acuity that comprises eye-opened, eye-closed training, and testing sessions. Healthy participants judge the orientation of a rotating grating ball presented on their index fingerpads in a two-alternative forced-choice task. A variable rotation speed of 5, 10, 40, or 160 mm/s was used for the tactile measurement at a variety of difficulties. All participants met the passing criteria for the training experiment. Performance in orientation identification, quantified by the proportion of trials with correct answers, differed across scanning directions, with the highest rotation speed (160 mm/s) having the worst performance. Accuracy did not differ between vertical and horizontal orientations. Our results demonstrated the utility of the pre-test training protocol and the functionality of the developed procedure for tactile acuity assessment. The novel protocol performed well when applied to the participants. Future studies will be conducted to apply this method to patients with impairment of light touch.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Home-Based Sensory Perception Training Game for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Study.

Objective: The primary aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a prototype of a novel digital system enabling somatosensory training at home by means of a gamified mobile application in patients with chronic pain. The secondary aims were to test the effect size of the intervention on clinical outcomes to power a subsequent randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with fibromyalgia. This was an 8-week crossover study, which included a 4-week somatosensory training phase (daily use with the novel digital system) and a 4-week control phase (no use of this new system) in a random order. Feasibility was tested by objectively measuring the adherence and retention rates. Acceptability and changes in pain and disability were measured through data from subjective questionnaires. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the study. The satisfaction questionnaire indicated high training enjoyment, ease of use for daily training and interest to continue to use the intervention after the study. The adherence (93%) and retention (94%) rates were high. The effect sizes were moderate for pain intensity (0.57). Conclusion: The novel gamified technology for remotely delivered somatosensory training is feasible in a group of patients with fibromyalgia, and results in high engagement, satisfaction, and adherence. A subsequent clinical trial with the final version of the technology platform, including a longer training with more sensory training tasks and a bigger sample size is necessary.

Tactile acuity improves during acute experimental pain of the limb.

Introduction: Chronic pain is associated with poor tactile acuity, commonly measured with the 2-point discrimination (TPD) test. Although poor tactile acuity across chronic pain conditions is well established, less is known in acute pain. Objective: Recent conflicting findings in experimentally induced neck and back pain led us to conduct a TPD investigation in experimentally induced limb pain. We hypothesised altered TPD during experimental upper limb pain, but we did not speculate on the direction of the change. Methods: Thirty healthy subjects immersed their dominant hand in a circulating cold-water bath at 7°C (cold pressor test [CPT]). Two-point discrimination was measured at baseline (pre-CPT), during pain (during-CPT), and after withdrawal from the water (post-CPT) in 3 different sites: (1) the dominant forearm, (2) dominant arm and (3) contralateral forearm. Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect of time (F(2,56) = 4.45, P = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.14) on TPD; in all 3 sites, TPD values decreased (ie, tactile acuity improved) during pain. Interestingly, the contralateral forearm followed a similar pattern to the dominant (ie, painful) forearm, and furthermore was the only site that exhibited any correlation with pain, albeit in an intriguing direction (r = 0.57, P = 0.001), ie, the greater the pain the worse the tactile acuity. Conclusion: The improvements in tactile acuity during experimentally induced limb pain may reflect a protective response. The changes in the corresponding site in the contralateral limb may reflect a protective spinal cross talk. Such a response, together with the interesting relationship between tactile acuity and pain, warrant further inquiry.

Comparison of reliability and efficiency of two modified two-point discrimination tests and two-point estimation tactile acuity test.

Objectives: Determine reliability and minimal detectible difference of two modified two-point discrimination (TPD) testing methods and explore reliability of newer tactile acuity test, two-point estimation (TPE) method.Design: Non-experimental observational reliability study.Setting: Community.Participants: Thirty-five (female = 25) healthy individuals average age 27.7 years (SD = 9.7).Intervention: Two modified methods (i.e., descending-ascending and descending with randomization) of TPD testing utilizing decreased runs of descending and ascending measurements were tested for inter-rater reliability and efficiency between two testers at three locations (neck, hand, and foot). The newer tactile acuity test of TPE was also performed between both examiners at the three location sites.Results: Inter-rater reliability (ICC 2, k) for the descending-ascending method was 0.75, 0.79, and 0.67 for the neck, hand, and foot, respectively. For the descending with randomization method, ICC values were 0.74, 0.50, and 0.69 for the three body regions respectively. The minimal detectable difference for the neck was 28.8 and 32.7 mm, hand 5.3 and 10.8 mm, and foot 12.3 and 12.4 mm for the descending-ascending and randomization methods. TPE showed poor reliability for neck and hand (0.27 and 0.15), but moderate reliability for the foot (0.67). Time to perform the TPD test were between 54 and 108 seconds, while TPE was 12 seconds.Conclusion: The modified TPD testing methods demonstrated similar reliability to previous research, even with reduced runs allowing for increased efficiency in performing the test. The TPE method showed poor reliability, so caution should be applied when using this method.

Prediction and trend of tactile acuity, pain and disability in acute LBP: a six-month prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic back pain is known to be associated with altered tactile acuity. Tactile acuity is measured using the Two-Point Discrimination (TPD) test in both clinical and research settings. In subjects with chronic low back pain, the TPD threshold (TPDT) is increased and is associated with persistent pain. It remains unknown, however, whether TPDT is also altered in cases of clinical acute pain, or whether it could be used as a predictor of future pain and disability at an early stage of LBP. The main objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of baseline TPDT for pain and disability at 3 and 6 months after the onset of acute LBP. The TPDT in acute low back pain (LBP) and the development of TPDT over 6 months has also been assessed. METHODS: LBP participants (n = 124) with acute LBP (< 4 weeks) were included. Subjects were examined within 4 weeks of pain onset and followed-up after 3 and 6 months of pain onset. Horizontal and vertical TPDTs of the lower back were collected. Linear mixed models were subsequently used to evaluate the association of TPDT with pain and disability over time. RESULTS: The vertical TPDT showed a mean (SD) of 4.9 cm (1.6) and the horizontal TPDT a mean (SD) of 6.0 cm (1.5) at baseline. The vertical TPDT altered from baseline up to 6 months from 4.9 to 4.6 cm and the horizontal TPDT from 6.0 to 5.4 cm. The association between the TPDT and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after 6 months was moderate. Linear mixed models revealed no association between TPDT, pain and disability over the progression of LBP. CONCLUSION: TPDTs appear to be raised in subjects with acute LBP. However, our study revealed no predictive capability of the TPDT for disability and pain. No comparisons are possible in the absence of similar studies, indicating the need for further research is in this area.

The iSTOPP study: Protocol for a proof-of-concept randomised clinical trial of sensory discrimination training in people with persistent neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain can be associated with a reduction in tactile acuity that is thought to reflect disrupted sensory processing. Tactile acuity training may normalise sensory processing and improve symptoms. This proof-of-concept trial will assess the feasibility of a novel tactile acuity training method and whether this intervention improves tactile acuity in people with persistent neck pain. METHODS: and analysis: In this two-arm randomised clinical proof-of-concept trial we will recruit participants with neck pain receiving usual care physiotherapy in a secondary outpatient healthcare setting. Thirty-six participants will be randomised 2:1 to receive four weeks of either tactile acuity training using the Imprint Tactile Acuity Device (iTAD) or a placebo intervention, in addition to usual care. The placebo intervention will consist of a de-activated TENS machine (iTENS) said to deliver a sub-threshold inhibitory therapy. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, mid-treatment, and at 5-weeks and 2-months follow-up. The primary outcome tactile acuity will be evaluated using the two-point discrimination test and locognosia tests. Feasibility will be informed by recruitment and attrition rates, adherence, credibility of the interventions, treatment satisfaction and blinding. Pain intensity and anatomical spread will be analysed as secondary outcomes. The effect of iTAD training on tactile acuity will be assessed using a 2 (Group: iTAD vs. iTENS) x 4 (Time: baseline, mid-treatment, 5-week and 2-month outcome assessment) mixed ANOVA. Secondary outcomes including pain and pain spread, will be analysed with a focus on informing sample size calculations in future trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Risks associated with this study are minor. Usual care is not withheld, and participants consent to random allocation of either iTAD or iTENS. Potential benefits to participants include any benefit associated with the interventions and contributing to research that may assist people with chronic pain in the future. Trial results will be disseminated via academic journals and conference presentations. The study is approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Griffith University (2017/128).

Effects of acute pain and strain of the periodontium due to orthodontic separation on the occlusal tactile acuity of healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether pain and strain of the periodontal ligament (PDL), induced by orthodontic separation, alter the somatosensory ability to perceive small thicknesses between occluding teeth (occlusal tactile acuity, OTA). METHODS: The OTA was tested at baseline (T0), using 9 aluminum foils (range 8-72 µm), randomly placed between the molar teeth, and 1 sham test (without foil), asking the participants whether they felt the foil between their teeth. Afterwards, orthodontic separators were placed, and subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups: Group Pain (GP: 18 males; 14 females mean age 25.22 ± 2.28 years) had separators removed after 24 h; Group Strain (GS: 14 males; 17 females, mean age 24.03 ± 3.06 years) had separators removed after 7 days. The OTA measurement was repeated in both groups immediately after orthodontic separators removal (T1). A within-group comparison (T1 vs T0) was performed for each testing thickness (ANOVA for repeated measurements, with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing) (p < 0.005). RESULTS: GP showed statistically significant reduction of the OTA at T1, as compared to T0, for the thicknesses 24 µm (p = 0.004) and 32 µm (p = 0.001). No significant reduction was observed in GS (all p > 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Acute periodontal pain tends to disturb the tactile ability of the teeth, while strain of the PDL in absence of painful sensation determines a return to OTA baseline values. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The reduction of OTA might explain the uncomfortable occlusal sensation referred by patients during acute periodontal pain.

Tactile acuity of fingertips and hand representation size in human Area 3b and Area 1 of the primary somatosensory cortex.

Intracortical mapping in monkeys revealed a full body map in all four cytoarchitectonic subdivisions of the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), as well as positive associations between spatio-tactile acuity performance of the fingers and their representation field size especially within cytoarchitectonic Area 3b and Area 1. Previous non-invasive investigations on these associations in humans assumed a monotonous decrease of representation field size from index finger to little finger although the field sizes are known to change in response to training or in disease. Recent developments improved noninvasive functional mapping of S1 by a) adding a cognitive task during repetitive stimulation to decrease habituation to the stimuli, b) smaller voxel size of fMRI-sequences, c) surface-based analysis accounting for cortical curvature, and d) increase of spatial specificity for fMRI data analysis by avoidance of smoothing, partial volume effects, and pial vein signals. We here applied repetitive pneumatic stimulation of digit 1 (D1; thumb) and digit 5 (D5; little finger) on both hands to investigate finger/hand representation maps in the complete S1, but also in cytoarchitectonic Areas 1, 2, 3a, and 3b separately, in 21 healthy volunteers using 3T fMRI. The distances between activation maxima of D1 and D5 were evaluated by two independent raters, blinded for performance parameters. The fingertip representations showed a somatotopy and were localized in the transition region between the crown and the anterior wall of the post central gyrus agreeing with Area 1 and 3b. Participants were comprehensively tested for tactile performance using von Freyhair filaments to determine cutaneous sensory thresholds (CST) as well as grating orientation thresholds (GOT) and two-point resolution (TPD) for spatio-tactile acuity testing. Motor performance was evaluated with pinch grip performance (Roeder test). We found bilateral associations of D1-D5 distance for GOT thresholds and partially also for TPD in Area 3b and in Area 1, but not if using the complete S1 mask. In conclusion, we here demonstrate that 3T fMRI is capable to map associations between spatio-tactile acuity and the fingertip representation in Area 3b and Area 1 in healthy participants.

The self-perceived body size in obesity: Evidence from the implicit representation of the hand.

To locate our body in the space, we rely on an implicit representation of body size and shape: the body model. Evidence about the implicit representation of bodily dimensions in obesity is rare. Nevertheless, it seems to suggest that such representation is not altered in obesity compared to healthy weight individuals. To probe further this hypothesis, we investigated the implicit representation of hand dimensions with a landmark localisation task, comparing individuals with obesity and healthy weight individuals. Furthermore, as body model distortions may be related to tactile acuity, the tactile acuity threshold was measured using a two-point discrimination task. In accordance with the previous evidence, we observed that healthy weight participants showed a significant underestimation of finger length and overestimation of hand width. Interestingly, comparable body model distortions were shown also in participants with obesity. No differences in tactile acuity emerged between the two groups; also, when considering the whole sample, as tactile acuity decreases hand width overestimation increases. Thus, obesity seems to have no effect on the characteristics of the body model relative to the hand. Accordingly, the physiological mechanisms supporting the development of the implicit representation of hand dimensions in the healthy weight population may be preserved in obesity.

Interrogating cortical representations in elite athletes with persistent posterior thigh pain - New targets for intervention?

OBJECTIVES: Hamstring injuries in athletes can lead to significant time away from competition as a result of persistent posterior thigh pain. These cases are often difficult to treat as the state of the tissues alone cannot explain symptoms. In non-athletic populations with persistent pain, disruptions to tactile, proprioceptive, and spatial cortical representations exist, which has led to promising brain-based treatments. Here, we explored whether athletes with persistent posterior thigh pain also display impairments in these cortical representations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Fourteen male professional athletes with persistent posterior thigh pain ('Patients') and 14 pain-free age, sport, body mass index and level-matched controls ('Controls') participated. The tactile cortical representation was assessed using two-point discrimination (TPD) threshold and accuracy of tactile localisation; the proprioceptive cortical representation was assessed using a left/right judgement task; spatial processing was assessed using an auditory detection task. RESULTS: TPD thresholds were similar for Patients and Controls (p=0.70). Patients were less accurate at localising tactile stimuli delivered to their affected leg, slower to make left/right judgements when the lower limb image corresponded to the side of their affected leg, and less accurate at detecting auditory stimuli delivered near their affected leg, when compared to their healthy leg or to the leg of Controls (p<0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Leg-specific tactile, proprioceptive, and spatial processing deficits exist in athletes with persistent posterior thigh pain. That these processing deficits exist despite rehabilitation and normal tissue healing time suggests they may play a role in the persistence of posterior thigh pain.