The role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists in the treatment of vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by progressive skin depigmentation. Vitiligo significantly impacts patients' quality of life, contributing to psychological and social burdens. Despite readily available therapeutic options, many cases remain refractory to treatment, highlighting the critical need for safer and more effective therapies. Currently, ruxolitinib is the only FDA-approved medication for vitiligo; however, it carries a black box warning for serious adverse effects, including infections, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events, limiting its use. Recent studies have identified the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) as a promising therapeutic target, suggesting that AhR agonists could address the multifaceted pathogenesis of vitiligo. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search to analyze the role of AhR agonists in the treatment of vitiligo on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases on April 15, 2024. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising two clinical trials, two case reports, and nine basic science studies. Our search revealed that culturing AhR agonists with melanocytes upregulates melanin-synthesizing enzymes, reduces reactive oxygen species, and modulates pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-17A and IL-22. Tapinarof, a topical AhR agonist used commonly for the treatment of psoriasis, demonstrated clinical efficacy in repigmentation with a favorable safety profile compared to long-term steroid use. Although limited by the number of clinical studies, this review underscores the potential of using AhR agonists, such as tapinarof, as a transformative approach to vitiligo management. Future clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of AhR agonists.

Topical Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis: What is New and the New Paradigm.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that requires a complex management strategy, which often involves multiple and diverse topicals and systemic treatment regimens. While topical steroids and more recently calcineurin inhibitors have been the mainstay therapy for mild-to-moderate disease, recent advances in the understanding of AD pathogenesis have led to the development of different new targets, rapidly widening our therapeutic armamentarium. This review summarizes their efficacy and safety data. We also review topical optimization strategies, including the recently published topical volume calculator, to maximize long-term disease control, especially when using multiple agents at the same time.

Spectrofluorimetric determination of tapinarof via Zn (II) complexation and assessment of its topical dosage application.

Topical tapinarof is used to treat plaque psoriasis (a skin disease in which red and scaly patches form are appeared on some areas of the body). The goal of the current research is to establish a facile and rapid fluorimetric technique for tapinarof analysis. The approach relied on the reaction between the drug and zinc ion through metal complexation to produce a highly-fluorescent product. The fluorescence was further enhanced by adding sodium dodecyl sulfate, and it was observed at 542 nm following excitation at 497 nm. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9997, the association between emission intensity and tapinarof concentration was linear between 2.0 and 120 ng mL-1. 1.021 ng mL-1 was the quantitation limit while 0.366 ng mL-1 was the detection limit. The buffer type, pH and concentration, type of surfactant and concentration, and finally the diluting solvent were among the reaction conditions that were closely examined and it was found that the optimum conditions were obtained upon employing teorell-stenhagen buffer optimized at pH 6.0, 1.38 × 10-2 M SDS and distilled water as a solvent are the suitable choice. With great precision and reliability, the drug under study was quantified using this method in ointment formulations. The proposed method's level of greenness was assessed using two methodologies: the analytical greenness metric (AGREE) and the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), with good recovery results ensuring high efficiency of the proposed approach on analysis of ointment without any interference from additives and excipients.

Tapinarof cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Efficacy and safety results from two Japanese phase 3 trials.

Tapinarof is a nonsteroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof cream 1% in Japanese patients aged ≥12 years with atopic dermatitis (AD) in two phase 3 trials, ZBB4-1 and ZBB4-2. ZBB4-1 (N = 216) consisted of an 8-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period (period 1) and a 16-week extension treatment period (period 2). Patients were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof or vehicle in period 1; subsequently, all patients who enrolled in period 2 received tapinarof. ZBB4-2 (N = 291) was a 52-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial in which all patients received tapinarof. In period 1 of ZBB4-1, the proportion of patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 8 (IGA treatment success, the primary end point) was 20.24% in the tapinarof group and 2.24% in the vehicle group (p = 0.0007). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 (EASI-75 response, the key secondary end point) was 40.3% in the tapinarof group and 4.3% in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001). In ZBB4-2, IGA treatment success rate was 28.1% at week 16, 32.3% at week 24, and 41.3% at week 52, and EASI-75 response rate was 53.3% at week 16, 63.7% at week 24, and 76.6% at week 52, indicating that efficacy responses improved over time and were maintained over 52 weeks. Across the two trials, most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate; common AEs included folliculitis, acne, and headache. In summary, tapinarof cream 1% was effective and generally safe for up to 52 weeks of treatment in Japanese patients with AD.

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of tapinarof and roflumilast topical therapies in the management of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. First-line topical treatments include steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and anthralin. Recently, novel topical therapeutics like tapinarof and roflumilast have emerged with unique anti-inflammatory mechanisms and promising efficacy profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify recent studies on tapinarof and roflumilast. Criteria focused on efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic roles in psoriasis treatment. RESULTS: Four primary literature articles were identified for tapinarof and five for roflumilast. Both drugs demonstrated strong efficacy with minimal adverse events in treating mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. Tapinarof showed more frequent but mild adverse effects, while roflumilast had less frequent but more severe side effects. DISCUSSION: Tapinarof and roflumilast offer once-daily dosing and successful treatment in restricted areas, potentially enhancing patient adherence. Cost remains a limiting factor, necessitating future comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the two drugs. CONCLUSION: Tapinarof and roflumilast present promising topical treatments for psoriasis, showing efficacy and manageable safety profiles. Further research is crucial to fully elucidate their comparative benefits and drawbacks in clinical practice.

Tapinarof cream for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from 2 Japanese phase 3 trials.

Tapinarof is a non-steroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof cream (1%) in Japanese patients aged ≥18 years with plaque psoriasis in two phase 3 trials, ZBA4-1 and ZBA4-2. ZBA4-1 (N = 158) consisted of a 12-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period (period 1) and a 12-week extension treatment period (period 2). Patients were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof or vehicle in period 1; subsequently, all patients who were enrolled in period 2 received tapinarof. ZBA4-2 (N = 305) was a 52-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial in which all patients received tapinarof. In period 1 of ZBA4-1, the proportion of patients who achieved a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 12 (PGA treatment success, the primary endpoint) was 20.06% in the tapinarof group and 2.50% in the vehicle group (p = 0.0035). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12 (PASI75 response, a key secondary endpoint) was 37.7% in the tapinarof group and 3.8% in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001). In ZBA4-2, PGA treatment success rate was 30.0% at week 12, 51.3% at week 24, and 56.3% at week 52, and PASI75 response rate was 50.4% at week 12, 77.5% at week 24, and 79.9% at week 52, indicating that efficacy responses improved over time and were maintained over 52 weeks. Across the two trials, most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate; common AEs included folliculitis and contact dermatitis. In summary, tapinarof cream (1%) was efficacious and generally safe for up to 52 weeks of treatment in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis.

Tapinarof and its structure-activity relationship for redox chemistry and phototoxicity on human skin keratinocytes.

Tapinarof (3,5-dihydroxy-4-isopropylstilbene) is a therapeutic agent used in the treatment of psoriasis (VTAMA®). In this study, we examined the redox behaviour, (photo)stability, (photo)toxicity and (bio)transformation of tapinarof in the context of a structure-activity relationship study. Selected derivatives of the structurally related tapinarof were investigated, namely resveratrol, pterostilbene, pinosylvin and its methyl ether. Tapinarof undergoes electrochemical oxidation in a neutral aqueous medium at a potential of around +0.5 V (vs. Ag|AgCl|3M KCl). The anodic reaction of this substance is a proton-dependent irreversible and adsorption-driven process. The pKa value of tapinarof corresponds to 9.19 or 9.93, based on empirical and QM calculation approach, respectively. The oxidation potentials of tapinarof and its analogues correlate well with their HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) energy level. The ability to scavenge the DPPH radical decreased in the order trolox ≥ resveratrol > pterostilbene > tapinarof > pinosylvin â‰« pinosylvin methyl ether. It was also confirmed that tapinarof, being a moderate electron donor, is able to scavenge the ABTS radical and inhibit lipid peroxidation. The 4'-OH group plays a pivotal role in antioxidant action of stilbenols. During the stability studies, it was shown that tapinarof is subject to spontaneous degradation under aqueous conditions, and its degradation is accelerated at elevated temperatures and after exposure to UVA (315-399 nm) radiation. In aqueous media at pH 7.4, we observed an ∼50 % degradation of tapinarof after 48 h at laboratory temperature. The main UVA photodegradation processes include dihydroxylation and hydration. In conclusion, the phototoxic effect of tapinarof on a human keratinocytes cell line (HaCaT) was evaluated. Tapinarof exhibited a clear phototoxic effect, similar to phototoxic standard chlorpromazine. The IC50 values of the cytotoxicity and phototoxic effects of tapinarof correspond to 27.6 and 3.7 µM, respectively. The main HaCaT biotransformation products of tapinarof are sulfates and glucuronides.

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily: Significant efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults and children down to 2 years of age in the pivotal phase 3 ADORING trials.

BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD), a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, downregulates pro-inflammatory Th2 cytokines, upregulates skin-barrier components, and reduces oxidative stress. OBJECTIVE: To assess tapinarof efficacy and safety in adults and children down to 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: Eight hundred and thirteen patients were randomized to tapinarof or vehicle QD in two 8-week phase 3 trials. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis score of 0 or 1 and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 8, was met with statistical significance in both trials: 45.4% versus 13.9% and 46.4% versus 18.0% (tapinarof vs vehicle; both P < .0001). Significantly superior Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) responses were also observed with tapinarof versus vehicle at Week 8: 55.8% versus 22.9% and 59.1% versus 21.2% (both P < .0001). Rapid improvements in patient-reported pruritus were also significant with tapinarof versus vehicle. Common adverse events (≥5%) of folliculitis, headache, and nasopharyngitis were mostly mild or moderate, with lower discontinuations due to adverse events in the tapinarof groups than with vehicle. LIMITATIONS: Long-term efficacy was not assessed. CONCLUSION: Tapinarof demonstrated highly significant efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability in a diverse population of patients with AD down to 2 years of age.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a focus on phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition that affects millions of pediatric and adult patients with well-studied impact on morbidity and quality of life. Management occurs in a stepwise fashion beginning with preventative measures before immunomodulators are introduced. However, challenges remain in treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that is refractory to first- and second-line treatments and there are only few topical anti-inflammatory options, especially for pediatric patients. AREAS COVERED: New medications are required to address these gaps as lesions may persist despite treatment or patients may discontinue treatment due to actual or anticipated adverse effects of mainstay medications. Emerging research into the pathophysiology of AD and the immune system at large has provided opportunities for novel interventions aimed at stopping AD mechanisms at new checkpoints. Clinical trials for 36 agents currently in phase 2 or phase 3 are evaluated with particular focus on the studies for, B244, CBP-201, tapinarof, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, amlitelimab, and rocatinlimab as they explore novel pathways and have some of the most promising results. EXPERT OPINION: These clinical trials contribute to the evolution of AD treatment toward greater precision based on salient pathways with a particular focus on moderate-to-severe AD to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor role in chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a narrative review.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that has gained increasing attention in the field of dermatology due to its multifaceted role in skin health and disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the AHR and its implications in dermatological conditions. The AHR is well known for its involvement in xenobiotic metabolism, particularly in response to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins. However, recent research has unveiled its pivotal role in the skin immune response, barrier function, and homeostasis. The AHR signalling pathway is intricately linked to various dermatological disorders, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, acne and hidradenitis suppurativa. In this review, we delve into the molecular mechanisms through which AHR activation influences skin physiology and highlight how dysregulation can lead to pathological conditions. Moreover, we discuss the emerging therapeutic potential of AHR modulators in the treatment of skin diseases. In conclusion, the AHR is a pivotal player in dermatology, with a multifaceted role in skin physiology and pathology. Understanding the intricacies of AHR signalling in the skin offers promising avenues for the development of novel therapies and preventive strategies for various dermatological conditions. Further research is warranted to elucidate the full scope of AHR's contributions to dermatology and its potential as a therapeutic target.

New and Emerging Oral/Topical Small-Molecule Treatments for Psoriasis.

The introduction of biologic therapies has led to dramatic improvements in the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Even though the efficacy and safety of the newer biologic agents are difficult to match, oral administration is considered an important advantage by many patients. Current research is focused on the development of oral therapies with improved efficacy and safety compared with available alternatives, as exemplified by deucravacitinib, the first oral allosteric Tyk2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in adults. Recent advances in our knowledge of psoriasis pathogenesis have also led to the development of targeted topical molecules, mostly focused on intracellular signaling pathways such as AhR, PDE-4, and Jak-STAT. Tapinarof (an AhR modulator) and roflumilast (a PDE-4 inhibitor) have exhibited favorable efficacy and safety outcomes and have been approved by the FDA for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis. This revision focuses on the most recent oral and topical therapies available for psoriasis, especially those that are currently under evaluation and development for the treatment of psoriasis.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and IL-13 signaling crosstalk in human keratinocytes and atopic dermatitis.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an allergic skin disease mediated by skin barrier impairment and IL-13-driven immune response. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has shown promise in early clinical trials for AD; however, the mechanism by which AHR partially ameliorates AD is not well known. Methods: Gene expression data from human biopsies were analyzed, and compared to gene expression from RNA-sequencing in our in-vitro HaCaT cell model system. Western blot, ELISA qRT-PCR were used to further explore the relationship between AHR and IL-13 signaling in HaCaT cells. Results: The AHR target gene CYP1A1 was decreased in lesional skin compared with healthy control skin (p = 4.30 × 10-9). Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) demonstrated increased AHR expression (p < 1.0 × 10-4) and decreased CYP1A1 expression in lesional AD keratinocytes compared with healthy control keratinocytes (p < 0.001). Activation of AHR by AHR agonists in HaCaT cells reversed IL-13-dependent gene expression of several key genes in AD pathogenesis, most notably the eosinophil chemoattractant CCL26 (eotaxin-3). Differentially expressed genes in keratinocytes of patients with AD substantially overlapped with genes regulated by AHR agonists from HaCaT cells by RNAseq, but in reverse direction. Mechanistically, there was evidence for direct transcriptional effects of AHR; AHR binding motifs were identified in the differentially expressed genes from lesional AD keratinocytes compared to control keratinocytes, and AHR activation did not modify IL-13-dependent signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) translocation to the nucleus. Discussion: Together, these data suggest that the AHR pathway is dysregulated in AD and that AHR modulates IL-13 downstream signaling in keratinocytes through genome-wide, transcriptional regulatory effects.

Efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib, Crisaborole, and Tapinarof for mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a Bayesian network analysis of RCTs.

Given the lack of head-to-head studies of novel non-steroidal molecule topical therapies in mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD), network meta-analyses (NMAs) can provide comparative efficacy and safety data for clinical decision-making. In this NMA, we performed a literature search until 01 March 2023 for eligible studies written in English using databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with topical Ruxolitinib, Crisaborole, or Tapinarof versus vehicle for patients with mild-to-moderate AD were included. Baseline and follow-up data were extracted. Efficacy was evaluated using Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) achieving "clear" or "almost clear," with 2 points or more improvement from baseline at the end of treatment, referred to as "IGA success." For binary outcomes, we analyzed in random-effects Bayesian NMA consistency models to compare the efficacy of these 3 topical therapies by odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility interval (CrI). Overall, 10 phase 2 or phase 3 RCTs were identified, which included 4010 patients with mild to moderate AD. Compared with the topical vehicle control, all these 3 treatments had higher response rate of "IGA success" at the end of trial (Ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d: OR, 11.94; 95%CrI, 6.28-23.15; Crisaborole 2% b.i.d: OR, 2.08; 95%CrI, 1.46-3.52; Tapinarof 1% b.i.d: OR, 2.64; 95%CrI, 0.75-9.70). Notably, Ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d. had the highest probability of achieving "IGA success" in ranking analysis (Rank 1, SUCRA = 0.75) and lower risk of AE (Rank 8, SUCRA = 0.22). Besides, there was no difference in treatment-related adverse events between 3 therapies. Heterogeneity was not significant across studies.

A Review of Topical Tapinarof for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the efficacy and safety of 1% tapinarof cream for plaque psoriasis. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted from August 2022 to February 2023. The terms tapinarof, VTAMA, benvitimod, GSK2894512, DMVT-505, and WBI-1001 were queried in PubMed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing or unpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical trials written in English and relevant to pharmacology, efficacy, and safety were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: In two 12-week phase III clinical trials, disease severity assessed by a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of clear or almost clear and a 2-point PGA improvement was 35.4% and 40.2% at week 12 in the 2 trials, respectively. In the 40-week, open-label extension trial, the efficacy and safety results were similar: 40.9% of patients achieved a PGA of 0 at least once during the trial, and 58.2% of patients with PGA ≥ 2 achieved PGA 0/1 at least once. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING DRUGS: Tapinarof is a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist and a first-in-class, potentially promising treatment for plaque psoriasis recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, tapinarof may be an effective and safe topical treatment for mild to severe plaque psoriasis. Head-to-head trials to compare the efficacy and adverse effect profile of tapinarof to other topical treatments are still needed, as are investigation in patients with recent or current use of phototherapy or biologic or nonbiologic systemics. Cost and adherence to treatment may be barriers for treatment efficacy.