Estimation of the absorbed dose in simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis and mechanical imaging.

Purpose: Use of mechanical imaging (MI) as complementary to digital mammography (DM), or in simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and MI - DBTMI, has demonstrated the potential to increase the specificity of breast cancer screening and reduce unnecessary biopsies compared with DM. The aim of this study is to investigate the increase in the radiation dose due to the presence of an MI sensor during simultaneous image acquisition when automatic exposure control is used. Approach: A radiation dose study was conducted on clinically available breast imaging systems with and without an MI sensor present. Our estimations were based on three approaches. In the first approach, exposure values were compared in paired clinical DBT and DBTMI acquisitions in 97 women. In the second approach polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms of various thicknesses were used, and the average glandular dose (AGD) values were compared. Finally, a rectangular PMMA phantom with a 45 mm thickness was used, and the AGD values were estimated based on air kerma measurements with an electronic dosemeter. Results: The relative increase in exposure estimated from digital imaging and communications in medicine headers when using an MI sensor in clinical DBTMI was 11.9 % ± 10.4 . For the phantom measurements of various thicknesses of PMMA, the relative increases in the AGD for DM and DBT measurements were, on average, 10.7 % ± 3.1 and 11.4 % ± 3.0 , respectively. The relative increase in the AGD using the electronic dosemeter was 11.2 % ± < 0.001 in DM and 12.2 % ± < 0.001 in DBT. The average difference in dose between the methods was 11.5 % ± 3.3 . Conclusions: Our measurements suggest that the use of simultaneous breast radiography and MI increases the AGD by an average of 11.5 % ± 3.3 . The increase in dose is within the acceptable values for mammography screening recommended by European guidelines.

In-silico study of the impact of system design parameters on microcalcification detection in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis.

Purpose: Accurate detection of microcalcifications ( µ Calcs ) is crucial for the early detection of breast cancer. Some clinical studies have indicated that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems with a wide angular range have inferior µ Calc detectability compared with those with a narrow angular range. This study aims to (1) provide guidance for optimizing wide-angle (WA) DBT for improving µ Calcs detectability and (2) prioritize key optimization factors. Approach: An in-silico DBT pipeline was constructed to evaluate µ Calc detectability of a WA DBT system under various imaging conditions: focal spot motion (FSM), angular dose distribution (ADS), detector pixel pitch, and detector electronic noise (EN). Images were simulated using a digital anthropomorphic breast phantom inserted with 120 µ m µ Calc clusters. Evaluation metrics included the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the filtered channel observer and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of multiple-reader multiple-case analysis. Results: Results showed that FSM degraded µ Calcs sharpness and decreased the SNR and AUC by 5.2% and 1.8%, respectively. Non-uniform ADS increased the SNR by 62.8% and the AUC by 10.2% for filtered backprojection reconstruction with a typical clinical filter setting. When EN decreased from 2000 to 200 electrons, the SNR and AUC increased by 21.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Decreasing the detector pixel pitch from 85 to 50 µ m improved the SNR and AUC by 55.6% and 7.5%, respectively. The combined improvement of a 50 µ m pixel pitch and EN200 was 89.2% in the SNR and 12.8% in the AUC. Conclusions: Based on the magnitude of impact, the priority for enhancing µ Calc detectability in WA DBT is as follows: (1) utilizing detectors with a small pixel pitch and low EN level, (2) allocating a higher dose to central projections, and (3) reducing FSM. The results from this study can potentially provide guidance for DBT system optimization in the future.

An investigation of tomosynthesis on the diagnostic efficacy of spot compression mammography.

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of tomosynthesis spot compression (TSC) compared with conventional spot compression (CSC) for ambiguous findings on full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this retrospective study, 122 patients (including 108 patients with dense breasts) with ambiguous FFDM findings were imaged with both CSC and TSC. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and evaluated lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Pathology or at least a 1-year follow-up imaging was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic efficacies of CSC and TSC were compared, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The mean glandular dose was recorded and compared for TSC and CSC. Of the 122 patients, 63 had benign lesions and 59 had malignant lesions. For Reader 1, the following diagnostic efficacies of TSC were significantly higher than those of CSC: AUC (0.988 vs. 0.906, P = 0.001), accuracy (93.4% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.001), specificity (87.3% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.002), PPV (88.1% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.010), and NPV (100% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.029). For Reader 2, TSC showed higher AUC (0.949 vs. 0.909, P = 0.011) and accuracy (83.6% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.022) than CSC. The mean glandular dose of TSC was higher than that of CSC (1.85 ± 0.53 vs. 1.47 ± 0.58 mGy, P < 0.001) but remained within the safety limit. TSC provides better diagnostic efficacy with a slightly higher but tolerable radiation dose than CSC. Therefore, TSC may be a candidate modality for patients with ambiguous findings on FFDM.

Introduction of one-view tomosynthesis in population-based mammography screening: Impact on detection rate, interval cancer rate and false-positive rate.

OBJECTIVE: To assess performance endpoints of a combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with FFDM only in breast cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective population-based screening study, including eligible (50-69 years) women attending the Capital Region Mammography Screening Program in Denmark. All attending women were offered FFDM. A subgroup was consecutively allocated to a screening room with DBT. All FFDM and DBT underwent independent double reading, and all women were followed up for 2 years after screening date or until next screening date, whichever came first. RESULTS: 6353 DBT + FFDM and 395 835 FFDM were included in the analysis and were undertaken in 196 267 women in the period from 1 November 2012 to 12 December 2018. Addition of DBT increased sensitivity: 89.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.0-95.5) for DBT + FFDM and 70.1% (95% CI: 68.6-71.6) for FFDM only, p < 0.001. Specificity remained similar: 98.2% (95% CI: 97.9-98.5) for DBT + FFDM and 98.3% (95% CI: 98.2-98.3) for FFDM only, p = 0.9. Screen-detected cancer rate increased statistically significantly: 11.18/1000 for DBT + FFDM and 6.49/1000 for FFDM only, p < 0.001. False-positive rate was unchanged: 1.75% for DBT + FFDM and 1.73% for FFDM only, p = 0.9. Positive predictive value for recall was 39.0% (95% CI: 31.9-46.5) for DBT + FFDM and 27.3% (95% CI: 26.4-28.2), for FFDM only, p < 0.0005. The interval cancer rate decreased: 1.26/1000 for DBT + FFDM and 2.76/1000 for FFDM only, p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: DBT + FFDM yielded a statistically significant increase in cancer detection and program sensitivity.

Dynamic reconstruction for digital tomosynthesis: a phantom proof of concept for breast care.

OBJECTIVE: Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a type of limited-angle Computed Tomography (CT) used in orthopedic and oncology care to provide a pseudo-3D reconstructed volume of a body part from multiple X-ray projections. Patient motion during acquisitions results in artifacts which affect screening and diagnostic performances. Hence, accurate reconstruction of moving body parts from a tomosynthesis projection series is addressed in this paper, with a particular focus on the breast. The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility of a novel dynamic reconstruction technique for DTS and evaluate its accuracy compared to an available ground truth. APPROACH: The proposed method is a combination of a 4D dynamic tomography strategy leveraging the formalism of Projection-based Digital Volume Correlation (P-DVC) with a multiscale approach to estimate and correct patient motion. Iterations of two operations are performed: i) a motion-corrected reconstruction based on the Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique (SIRT) algorithm and ii) a motion estimation from projection residuals, to obtain motion-free volumes. Performance is evaluated on a synthetic Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) case. Three slabs of a CIRS breast phantom are imaged on a Senographe Pristina™, under plate-wise rigid body motions with amplitudes ranging up to 10 mm so that an independent measurement of the motion can be accessed. Results: Results show a motion estimation average precision down to 0.183 mm (1.83 voxels), when compared to the independent measurement. Moreover, an 84.2% improvement on the mean residual error and a 59.9% improvement on the root mean square error (RMSE) with the original static reconstruction are obtained. Significance: Visual and quantitative assessments of the dynamically reconstructed volumes show that the proposed method fully restores conspicuity for important clinical features contained in the phantom.

Organizational impact of systemic implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy.

PURPOSE: We present a comprehensive investigation into the organizational, social, and ethical impact of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy. The analyses aimed to assess the feasibility of DBT specifically for all women aged 45-74, women aged 45-49 only, or those with dense breasts only. METHODS: Questions were framed according to the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EuNetHTA) Screening Core Model to produce evidence for the resources, equity, acceptability, and feasibility domains of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) decision framework. The study integrated evidence from the literature, the MAITA DBT trials, and Italian pilot programs. Structured interviews, surveys, and systematic reviews were conducted to gather data on organizational impact, acceptability among women, reading and acquisition times, and the technical requirements of DBT in screening. RESULTS: Implementing DBT could significantly affect the screening program, primarily due to increased reading times and the need for additional human resources (radiologists and radiographers). Participation rates in DBT screening were similar, if not better, to those observed with standard digital mammography, indicating good acceptability among women. The study also highlighted the necessity for specific training for radiographers. The interviewed key persons unanimously considered feasible tailored screening strategies based on breast density or age, but they require effective communication with the target population. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in radiologists' and radiographers' workload limits the feasibility of DBT screening. Tailored screening strategies may maximize the benefits of DBT while mitigating potential challenges.

Exploring advanced 2D acquisitions in breast tomosynthesis: T-shaped and Pentagon geometries.

In this study, we investigate the performance of advanced 2D acquisition geometries - Pentagon and T-shaped - in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and compare them against the conventional 1D geometry. Unlike the conventional approach, our proposed 2D geometries also incorporate anterior projections away from the chest wall. Implemented on the Next-Generation Tomosynthesis (NGT) prototype developed by X-ray Physics Lab (XPL), UPenn, we utilized various phantoms to compare three geometries: a Defrise slab phantom with alternating plastic slabs to study low-frequency modulation; a Checkerboard breast phantom (a 2D adaptation of the Defrise phantom design) to study the ability to reconstruct the fine features of the checkerboard squares; and the 360° Star-pattern phantom to assess aliasing and compute the Fourier-spectral distortion (FSD) metric that assesses spectral leakage and the contrast transfer function. We find that both Pentagon and T-shaped scans provide greater modulation amplitude of the Defrise phantom slabs and better resolve the squares of the Checkerboard phantom against the conventional scan. Notably, the Pentagon geometry exhibited a significant reduction in aliasing of spatial frequencies oriented in the right-left (RL) medio-lateral direction, which was corroborated by a near complete elimination of spectral leakage in the FSD plot. Conversely T-shaped scan redistributes the aliasing between both posteroanterior (PA) and RL directions thus maintaining non-inferiority against the conventional scan which is predominantly affected by PA aliasing. The results of this study underscore the potential of incorporating advanced 2D geometries in DBT systems, offering marked improvements in imaging performance over the conventional 1D approach.

AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human Performance.

Purpose To compare two deep learning-based commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) systems for mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and benchmark them against the performance of radiologists. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive asymptomatic patients who underwent mammography with DBT (2019-2020). Two AI systems (Transpara 1.7.0 and ProFound AI 3.0) were used to evaluate the DBT examinations. The systems were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting malignancy overall and within subgroups based on mammographic breast density. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System results obtained from standard-of-care human double-reading were compared against AI results with use of the DeLong test. Results Of 419 female patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 52-70 years]) included, 58 had histologically proven breast cancer. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.91), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99) for Transpara, ProFound AI, and human double-reading, respectively. For Transpara, a rule-out criterion of score 7 or lower yielded 100% (95% CI: 94.2, 100.0) sensitivity and 60.9% (95% CI: 55.7, 66.0) specificity. The rule-in criterion of higher than score 9 yielded 96.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.1, 99.6) and 78.1% specificity (95% CI: 73.8, 82.5). For ProFound AI, a rule-out criterion of lower than score 51 yielded 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 93.8, 100) and 67.0% specificity (95% CI: 62.2, 72.1). The rule-in criterion of higher than score 69 yielded 93.1% (95% CI: 83.3, 98.1) sensitivity and 82.0% (95% CI: 77.9, 86.1) specificity. Conclusion Both AI systems showed high performance in breast cancer detection but lower performance compared with human double-reading. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis © RSNA, 2024.

Optimizing angular range in digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study investigating lesion detection across varied breast density and thickness.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal angular range (AR) for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems that provides highest lesion visibility across various breast densities and thicknesses. METHOD: A modular DBT phantom, consisting of tissue-equivalent adipose and glandular modules, along with a module embedded with test objects (speckles, masses, fibers), was used to create combinations simulating different breast thicknesses, densities, and lesion locations. A prototype DBT system operated at four ARs (AR±7.5°, AR±12.5°, AR±19°, and AR±25°) to acquire 11 projection images for each combination, with separate fixed doses for thin and thick combinations. Three blinded radiologists independently assessed lesion visibility in reconstructed images; assessments were averaged and compared using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Speckle visibility was highest with AR±7.5° or AR±12.5°, decreasing with wider ARs in all density and thickness combinations. The difference between AR±7.5° and AR±12.5° was not statistically significant, except for the tube-side speckles in thin-fatty combinations (5.83 [AR±7.5°] vs. 5.39 [AR±12.5°], P = 0.019). Mass visibility was not affected by AR in thick combinations, while AR±12.5° exhibited the highest mass visibility for both thin-fatty and thin-dense combinations (P = 0.032 and 0.007, respectively). Different ARs provided highest fiber visibility for different combinations; however, AR±12.5° consistently provided highest or comparable visibility. AR±12.5° showed highest overall lesion visibility for all density and thickness combinations. CONCLUSIONS: AR±12.5° exhibited the highest overall lesion visibility across various phantom thicknesses and densities using a projection number of 11.

Stationary prospective cardiac gated computed tomography-dynamic study in phantoms and in vivo.

This study explores the feasibility of a stationary gantry cardiac gated computed tomography (CT) with carbon nanotube (CNT) linear x-ray source arrays. Conventional rotational CTs are limited by the rotational forces on the rapidly spinning gantries. We have recently developed a stationary gantry CT system utilizing the multipixel CNT x-ray sources. As these sources also enable straightforward x-ray pulse control, we sought to explore the potential for performing gated prospective imaging with our stationary CT system. Prospective respiratory and cardiac gating control was implemented and the system was evaluated with dynamic phantom imaging studies followed by imaging of a porcine model with cardiac and respiratory gating. The findings revealed minimal motion artifacts, confirming successful physiologic gated acquisition in stationary gantry cardiac CT, showing the potential of this imaging approach. .

Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis in women with dense breasts and additional breast cancer risk factors: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) may improve sensitivity in population screening. However, evidence is currently limited on the performance of DBT in patients at a higher risk of breast cancer. This systematic review compares the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DBT, digital mammography (DM), and ultrasound, for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts and additional risk factors. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews via OvidSP were searched to identify literature from 2010 to August 21, 2023. Selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment (using QUADAS-2 and CHEERS) were completed in duplicate. Findings were summarised descriptively and narratively. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met pre-specified inclusion criteria. In women with breast symptoms or recalled for investigation of screen-detected findings (19 studies), DBT may be more accurate than DM. For example, in symptomatic women, the sensitivity of DBT + DM ranged from 82.8 % to 92.5 % versus 56.8 %-81.3 % for mammography (DM/synthesised images). However, most studies had a high risk of bias due to participant selection. Evidence regarding DBT in women with a personal or family history of breast cancer, for DBT versus ultrasound alone, and cost-effectiveness of DBT was limited. CONCLUSIONS: In women with dense breasts and additional risk factors for breast cancer, evidence is limited about the accuracy of DBT compared to other imaging modalities, particularly in those with personal or family history of breast cancer. Future research in this population should consider head-to-head comparisons of imaging modalities to determine the relative effectiveness of these imaging tests. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236470.

Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.

OBJECTIVES: The randomized TOmosynthesis plus SYnthesized MAmmography (TOSYMA) screening trial has shown that digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) is superior to digital mammography (DM) in invasive breast cancer detection varying with breast density. On the other hand, the overall average glandular dose (AGD) of DBT is higher than that of DM. Comparing the DBT + SM and DM trial arm, we analyzed here the mean AGD and their determinants per breast density category and related them to the respective invasive cancer detection rates (iCDR). METHODS: TOSYMA screened 99,689 women aged 50 to 69 years. Compression force, resulting breast thickness, the calculated AGD obtained from each mammography device, and previously published iCDR were used for comparisons across breast density categories in the two trial arms. RESULTS: There were 196,622 exposures of 49,227 women (DBT + SM) and 197,037 exposures of 49,132 women (DM) available for analyses. Mean breast thicknesses declined from breast density category A (fatty) to D (extremely dense) in both trial arms. However, while the mean AGD in the DBT + SM arm declined concomitantly from category A (2.41 mGy) to D (1.89 mGy), it remained almost unchanged in the DM arm (1.46 and 1.51 mGy, respectively). In relative terms, the AGD elevation in the DBT + SM arm (64.4% (A), by 44.5% (B), 27.8% (C), and 26.0% (D)) was lowest in dense breasts where, however, the highest iCDR were observed. CONCLUSION: Women with dense breasts may specifically benefit from DBT + SM screening as high cancer detection is achieved with only moderate AGD elevations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: TOSYMA suggests a favorable constellation for screening with digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography (DBT + SM) in dense breasts when weighing average glandular dose elevation against raised invasive breast cancer detection rates. There is potential for density-, i.e., risk-adapted population-wide breast cancer screening with DBT + SM. KEY POINTS: Breast thickness declines with visually increasing density in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Average glandular doses of DBT decrease with increasing density; digital mammography shows lower and more constant values. With the smallest average glandular dose difference in dense breasts, DBT plus SM had the highest difference in invasive breast cancer detection rates.

Deep learning analysis of serial digital breast tomosynthesis images in a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Different imaging tools, including digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), are frequently used for evaluating tumor response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study aimed to explore whether using artificial intelligence (AI) for serial DBT acquisitions during NACT for breast cancer can predict pathological complete response (pCR) after completion of NACT. METHODS: A total of 149 women (mean age 53 years, pCR rate 22 %) with breast cancer treated with NACT at Skane University Hospital, Sweden, between 2014 and 2019, were prospectively included in this observational cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02306096). DBT images from both the cancer and contralateral healthy breasts acquired at three time points: pre-NACT, after two cycles of NACT, and after the completion of six cycles of NACT (pre-surgery) were analyzed. The deep learning AI system used to predict pCR consisted of a backbone 3D ResNet and an attention and prediction module. The GradCAM method was used to obtain insights into the model decision basis through a quantitative analysis of the importance maps on the validation set. Moreover, specific model choices were motivated by ablation studies. RESULTS: The AI model reached an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.63-1.00) (test set). The spatial correlation of importance maps for input volumes from the same patient but at different time points was high, possibly indicating that the model focuses on the same areas during decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a high discriminative performance of our algorithm for predicting pCR/non-pCR. Availability of larger datasets would permit more comprehensive training of the models and more rigorous evaluation of their prediction performance for future patients.

Predicting Ki-67 expression levels in breast cancer using radiomics-based approaches on digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound.

Purpose: To construct and validate radiomics models that utilize ultrasound (US) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images independently and in combination to non-invasively predict the Ki-67 status in breast cancer. Materials and methods: 149 breast cancer women who underwent DBT and US scans were retrospectively enrolled from June 2018 to August 2023 in total. Radiomics features were acquired from both the DBT and US images, then selected and reduced in dimensionality using several screening approaches. Establish radiomics models based on DBT, and US separately and combined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were utilized to validate the predictive ability of the models. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the models. The output of the classifier with the best AUC performance was converted into Rad-score and was regarded as Rad-Score model. A nomogram was constructed using the logistic regression method, integrating the Rad-Score and clinical factors. The model's stability was assessed through AUC, calibration curves, and DCA. Results: Support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) were trained to establish radiomics models with the selected features, with SVM showing optimal results. The AUC values for three models (US_SVM, DBT_SVM, and merge_SVM) were 0.668, 0.704, and 0.800 respectively. The DeLong test indicated a notable disparity in the area under the curve (AUC) between merge_SVM and US_SVM (p = 0.048), while there was no substantial variability between merge_SVM and DBT_SVM (p = 0.149). The DCA curve indicates that merge_SVM is superior to unimodal models in predicting high Ki-67 level, showing more clinical values. The nomogram integrating Rad-Score with tumor size obtained the better performance in test set (AUC: 0.818) and had more clinical net. Conclusion: The fusion radiomics model performed better in predicting the Ki-67 expression level of breast carcinoma, but the gain effect is limited; thus, DBT is preferred as a preoperative diagnosis mode when resources are limited. Nomogram offers predictive advantages over other methods and can be a valuable tool for predicting Ki-67 levels in BC.

Next-generation digital chest tomosynthesis.

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the performance characteristics and potential utility of a novel tomosynthesis device as applied to imaging the chest, specifically relating to lung nodules. The imaging characteristics and quality of a novel digital tomosynthesis prototype system was assessed by scanning, a healthy volunteer, and an andromorphic lung phantom with different configurations of simulated pulmonary nodules. The adequacy of nodule detection on the phantoms was rated by chest radiologists using a standardized scale. Results from using this tomosynthesis device demonstrate in plane resolution of 16lp/cm, with estimated effective radiation doses of 90% less than low dose CT. Nodule detection was adequate across various anatomic locations on a phantom. These proof-of-concept tests showed this novel tomosynthesis device can detect lung nodules with low radiation dose to the patient. This technique has potential as an alternative to low dose chest CT for lung nodule screening and tracking.

A directional total variation minimization algorithm for isotropic resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.

An optimization-based image reconstruction algorithm is developed for contrast enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) using dual-energy scanning. The algorithm minimizes directional total variation (TV) with a data discrepancy and non-negativity constraints. Iodinated contrast agent (ICA) imaging is performed by reconstructing images from dual-energy DBT data followed by weighted subtraction. Physical DBT data is acquired with a Siemens Mammomat scanner of a structured breast phantom with ICA inserts. Results are shown for both directional TV minimization and filtered back-projection for reference. It is seen that directional TV is able to substantially reduce depth blur for the ICA objects.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update.

Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

How long does it take to read a mammogram? Investigating the reading time of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.

PURPOSE: To analyse digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reading times in the screening setting, compared to 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM), and investigate the impact of reader experience and professional group on interpretation times. METHOD: Reading time data were recorded in the PROSPECTS Trial, a prospective randomised trial comparing DBT plus FFDM or synthetic 2D mammography (S2D) to FFDM alone, in the National Health Service (NHS) breast screening programme, from January 2019-February 2023. Time to read DBT+FFDM or DBT+S2D and FFDM alone was calculated per case and reading times were compared between modalities using dependent T-tests. Reading times were compared between readers from different professional groups (radiologists and radiographer readers) and experience levels using independent T-tests. The learning curve effect of using DBT in screening on reading time was investigated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Forty-eight readers interpreted 1,242 FFDM batches (34,210 FFDM cases) and 973 DBT batches (13,983 DBT cases). DBT reading time was doubled compared to FFDM (2.09 ± 0.64 min vs. 0.98 ± 0.30 min; p < 0.001), and DBT+S2D reading was longer than DBT + FFDM (2.24 ± 0.62 min vs. 2.04 ± 0.46 min; p = 0.006). No difference was identified in reading time between radiologists and radiographers (2.06 ± 0.71 min vs. 2.14 ± 0.46 min, respectively; p = 0.71). Readers with five or more years of experience reading DBT were quicker than those with less experience (1.86 ± 0.56 min vs. 2.37 ± 0.65 min; p = 0.008), and DBT reading time decreased after less than 9 months accrued screening experience (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DBT reading times were double those of FFDM in the screening setting, but there was a short learning curve effect with readers showing significant improvements in reading times within the first nine months of DBT experience. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03733106.

Limited impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to full field digital mammography in an elevated breast cancer risk population.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in screening asymptomatic women with an elevated breast cancer life time risk (BCLTR) but without known genetic mutation. METHODS: This IRB-approved single-institution multi-reader study on prospectively acquired FFDM + DBT images included 429 asymptomatic women (39-69y) with an elevated BC risk on their request form. The BCLTR was calculated for each patient using the IBISrisk calculator v8.0b. The screening protocol and reader study consisted of 4-view FFDM + DBT, which were read by four independent radiologists using the BI-RADS lexicon. Standard of care (SOC) included ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with > 30 % BCLTR. Breast cancer detection rate (BCDR), sensitivity and positive predictive value were assessed for FFDM and FFDM + DBT and detection outcomes were compared with McNemar-test. RESULTS: In total 7/429 women in this clinically elevated breast cancer risk group were diagnosed with BC using SOC (BCDR 16.3/1000) of which 4 were detected with FFDM. Supplemental DBT did not detect additional cancers and BCDR was the same for FFDM vs FFDM + DBT (9.3/1000, McNemar p = 1). Moderate inter-reader agreement for diagnostic BI-RADS score was found for both study arms (ICC for FFDM and FFDM + DBT was 0.43, resp. 0.46). CONCLUSION: In this single institution study, supplemental screening with DBT in addition to standard FFDM did not increase BCDR in this higher-than-average BC risk group, objectively documented using the IBISrisk calculator.