[Click phenomenon in acquired Jaensch-Brown syndrome and trigger finger/thumb: the Notta syndrome]. / "Klick"-Phänomen beim erworbenen Jaensch-Brown-Syndrom und schnellenden Finger/Daumen: dem Notta-Syndrom.

CLINICAL FEATURES: The click phenomenon occurs when an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or of the extension of the finger/thumb, is forcefully overcome. The common cause is a nodule either of the superior oblique tendon posterior to the trochlea in the case of a Jaensch-Brown syndrome or of the digital flexor tendon anterior to the A1 annular pulley in the case of a trigger finger. Both locations share similar anatomical conditions for the development of the nodule and the pathomechanism of the click. RESULTS: From these identical findings in the eye and the hand in small children it can be assumed that the results from the studies of the hand in newborns and infants with a trigger thumb/finger are also applicable to the situation of the eye. 1. This motility disorder is not congenital. This is most likely due to an incomplete development at the time of birth of the sliding factors needed for a free passage of the tendon through the trochlea and the A1 annular pulley. 2. A distinction must be made between stages 0-3: stage 0 = no more restriction of the motility and no click phenomenon; stage 1 = forced active extension/elevation possible; stage 2 = only passive extension/elevation, each with a click phenomenon; stage 3 = no extension/elevation possible and no click phenomenon. 3. In most cases in early childhood there is a spontaneous complete recovery (75% after 6-7 years). In the eye this spontaneous course can only limitedly be shortened with motility exercises in combination with segmental occlusion. CONCLUSION: The click phenomenon is a symptom of stages 1 and 2 of an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or the extension of the finger/thumb. It should not be called a syndrome.

Ultrasound-guided vs. non-guided trigger finger release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Trigger finger (TF) is a common hand condition that can be treated with surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous surgery is superior to other conventional surgical methods. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing US-guided TF release with blind percutaneous or open approaches. We combined Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) across studies. Data processing and analysis were conducted using R software, version 4.3.1. RESULTS: Our analysis included eight RCTs and two observational studies with 555 patients. US-guided surgery significantly reduced postoperative DASH scores (MD -3.75 points; 95% CI = -7.48, -0.02; p < 0.01), shortened time to resume activities (MD -11.52 days; 95% CI = -16.13, -6.91; p < 0.01), hastened discontinuation of oral analgesics (MD -4.44 days; 95% CI = -8.01, -0.87; p < 0.01), and improved patient satisfaction scores (RR 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.23; p = 0.75). There were no significant differences in VAS scores, time to movement recovery, or surgical success rate. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release is a safe, effective, and superior alternative for treating TF compared to other methods, leading to improved DASH scores, quicker recovery, faster cessation of oral analgesics, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

Non-absorbable Suture-Loaded Anchors for Finger Pulley Reconstruction.

A 59-year-old woman, who previously underwent surgery on her left long finger A1 pulley and left small finger distal interphalangeal joint for triggering and mallet deformity at another medical facility in March 2021, sought evaluation at an Orthopedics Hand clinic. She presented with limited finger movement, a flexion contracture, and difficulty extending her left long finger. Examination revealed an A2 pulley injury with extensive scar tissue. Subsequently, she underwent surgery to remove the scar tissue and reconstruct the A2 pulley using suture tape anchors. This case highlights the negative outcome following A1 pulley release due to an unintended A2 injury, resulting in significant scarring and an intrinsic plus digit posture. Additionally, it underscores the potential effectiveness of using non-absorbable synthetic sutures to minimize scarring and promote an early range of motion in cases where healing leads to excessive scarring around the flexor tendon sheath.

Unusual Duplication of Flexor Tendons in the Middle Finger Leading to Trigger Finger: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review.

Duplication of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon is an extremely uncommon anatomical anomaly found within the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle, with minimal documentation in the current literature. We present the case of a 45-year-old female manual laborer who exhibited symptoms suggestive of trigger finger in her right middle finger. Surgical exploration uncovered a duplicated FDP tendon, a previously unreported anatomical anomaly in this context. Despite attempting conservative treatment initially, surgical intervention involving release of the A1 pulley, excision of the A1 pulley, and identification of the duplicated tendon was performed. The unusual nature of this anatomical variation highlights the need for additional research into its clinical significance and treatment options. This case highlights the significance of conducting comprehensive anatomical assessments to diagnose and treat uncommon variations within the FDS muscle. It underscores the continued need for collaborative research to enhance treatment approaches, especially in instances where trigger finger symptoms are present.

Safety and Efficacy of In-Office Hand Procedures.

Background: The primary concerns with operating on patients in the office setting are insufficient sterility and lack of appropriate resources in case of excessive bleeding or other surgical complications. This study serves to investigate these concerns and determine whether in-office hand surgeries are safe and clinically effective. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent minor hand operations in the office setting between December 2020 and December 2021 was performed. The surgical procedures included in this analysis are needle aponeurotomy, trigger finger release, foreign body removal, mass removal, and reduction in a finger fracture with or without percutaneous pinning. All fractures, which primarily included metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, were subsequently splinted. Sterility and hemostatic support were achieved via the Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) method. Major complications were defined as infection, major bleeding, and neurological deficits. Minor complications were defined as prolonged pain, prolonged inflammation, residual symptoms, and recurrence of symptoms within 1 month. Results: Five patients (3.8%) returned to the office for pain, inflammation, or stiffness of the affected finger, with two of the five returning with symptoms associated with osteoarthritis or pseudogout flare-ups. Five additional patients returned due to residual symptoms or recurrence of the primary complaint within 1 month of surgery. No patients experienced exogenous infection. Conclusion: The absence of major complications and high success rate for minor hand procedures shows the high degree of safety and efficacy that can be achieved via the in-office setting for select procedures. While proper patient selection is key, our result shows the in-office procedure room setting can offer the necessary elements of sterility and hemostatic support for several common hand surgeries.

Under 2$ hand anesthesia? Our first 800 cases with Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in hand surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The Wide-Awake-Local-Anesthesia-No-Tourniquet (WALANT) technique is being used progressively more and more in hand surgery as it avoids tourniquet-related complications and saves money. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, we analyzed our cases of carpal tunnel syndrome or trigger finger operated upon with this technique from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. RESULTS: We obtained 822 cases (426 carpal tunnel syndrome, 396 trigger finger) with an overall anesthesiologic efficacy (no need of additional anesthetic) of 97.8%. Patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the anesthetic choice in 99.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: We believe WALANT to be a safe and effective technique that every hand surgeon should have in his/her repertoire.

Identifying non-genetic factors associated with trigger finger.

BACKGROUND: The non-genetic factors predisposing to trigger finger (TF) have mostly been characterised in small studies from individual institutions. Here, we aimed to provide a more complete picture of TF and its associations. METHODOLOGY: This case-control study used cross-sectional data from the UK Biobank population-based cohort to identify and determine the strength of associations of phenotypic variables with TF. We performed multivariable logistic regression of a multitude of phenotypic factors associated with TF. RESULTS: We identified 2250 individuals with medical and surgical diagnostic codes for TF, and 398,495 controls. TF was found to be significantly associated with age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.04, P < 2.23×10-308), female sex (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.39, P = 2.35×10-3), body mass index (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16, P = 5.52×10-4), carpal tunnel syndrome (OR 9.59, 95% CI 8.68-10.59, P < 2.23×10-308), Dupuytren's disease (OR 4.89, 95% CI 4.06-5.89, P < 2.23×10-308), diabetes mellitus without complications (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15-1.58, P = 2.03×10-4) and with complications (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.90-3.17, P = 4.98×10-12), HbA1c (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P = 8.99×10-9), hypothyroidism (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.43, P = 4.75×10-3) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.68, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence supporting the well-known risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, carpal tunnel syndrome, age and female sex. Furthermore, we can confirm putative associations such as hypothyroidism, obesity and rheumatoid arthritis, while providing evidence against others such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. A novel finding arising from this study is the strong association with Dupuytren's disease. Our study design allowed us to identify these associations as being independent from carpal tunnel syndrome, thereby indicating a shared pathophysiology between this disease and TF.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy and Associated Rates of Trigger Finger, de Quervain Tenosynovitis, and Their Subsequent Management.

PURPOSE: Anabolic steroid therapy has been associated with tendon injury, but there is a paucity of evidence associating physiologic testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) with tenosynovitis of the hand, specifically trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between TRT and tenosynovitis of the hand. METHODS: This was a one-to-one exact matched retrospective cohort study using a large nationwide claims database. Records were queried between 2010 and 2019 for adult patients who filled a prescription for TRT for 3 consecutive months. Rates of new onset trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis and subsequent steroid injection or surgery were identified using ICD-9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology billing codes. Single-variable chi-square analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare rates in the TRT and control cohorts while controlling for potential confounding variables. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) are reported for each comparison. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, patients undergoing TRT were more than twice as likely to develop trigger finger compared to their matched controls. TRT was also associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing de Quervain tenosynovitis. Of the patients diagnosed with either trigger finger or de Quervain tenosynovitis over the 2-year period, patients with prior TRT were roughly twice as likely to undergo steroid injections or surgical release for both trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: TRT is associated with an increased likelihood of both trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis, and an increased likelihood of requiring surgical release for both conditions. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: With variable and conflicting results to date, it remains unclear whether the percutaneous or open surgical A1 pulley release technique is superior regarding safety and efficacy. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the two techniques. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2023. Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the eight included studies and 548 total patients, there were 278 subjects in the percutaneous release group and 270 subjects in the open release group. There was no significant difference between the two surgical techniques in postoperative rates of revision, complications, or pain. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques regarding the need for revision procedures, complications, or postoperative pain. Therefore, both open and percutaneous releases are appropriate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Primary Negative Prognostic Factors in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Surgery.

Objectives This study aims to investigate the negative prognostic indicators of pediatric and adult trigger finger surgery patients concerning complications, recurrence, and satisfaction. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 61 patients with a total of 91 trigger fingers, including 31 in children and 30 in adult patients, all of whom were treated using a standardized surgical technique. The study considered several demographic and clinical factors, including age, gender, dominant hand, body mass index, occupation, history of trauma, single or multiple finger involvement, staging according to Green classification, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, recurrence, revision surgery, utilization of non-surgical treatment methods, need for rehabilitation after surgery, time to return to work, the time interval from clinic initiation to the surgery, satisfaction and the duration of the follow-up period. In addition, the quick version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH); and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess patients' data. Results In adult patients, a statistically significant relationship was observed between the increasing grade of the Green stage and complication rate (p<0.001), recurrence (p<0.001), and lower satisfaction (p<0.001). No statistically significant relationship was identified between Green's classification and complications (p=0.129), recurrence (p=0.854), or satisfaction (p=0.143) in pediatric patients. While a statistically significant relationship existed between the time interval from clinic initiation to surgery and complications (p=0.033) in adult patients, no significant relationships were observed for recurrence or satisfaction. Conversely, there was no statistically significant relationship between the time interval from clinic initiation to surgery and complications, recurrence, or satisfaction in pediatric patients. Conclusion This study demonstrates that increasing the grade of the Green stage and duration of symptoms before surgery were the substantial factors contributing to prognosis in adult patients but not in pediatric patients. These findings can assist physicians during patients' treatment management. We suggest that physicians consider these factors for patients' satisfaction.

Prospective evaluation of a novel device for ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of carpal tunnel and trigger finger disease. Efficacy and safety of sono-instruments®.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous release procedures under sonography using Sono-Instruments® in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger (TF). METHODS: Prospective study involving 30 patients, divided into two groups (15 CTS, and 15 TF). The primary outcomes were surgical performance-related outcomes (visibility, ease of use, satisfaction, duration) using Sono-Instruments® and patient-related outcomes (pain, activity limitations, time to return to work, functional scores). Secondary outcomes included complications. Patients were followed for two months post-operatively. RESULTS: In the CTS group, the average age of the patients was 58.7 years. The percutaneous release of the transverse carpal ligament was effectively completed in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 80% could perform activities of daily living, and 80% of those working had returned to their activities. At two months, all patients had resumed all activities. Pillar pain was still present in 53.3%. In the TF group, the patients had an average age of 57.9 years. The percutaneous release of the A1 annular pulley was successful in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 93.3% could do all activities of daily living, and 75% of those working were back to their professional activities. At two months, all patients were back to all activities of daily living and work. The DASH score was significantly improved at two months, compared to preoperative, for both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous sono-guided release using Sono-Instruments® is safe and efficient, and associated with quick functional recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Can Patients Rely on ChatGPT to Answer Hand Pathology-Related Medical Questions?

BACKGROUND: In recent years, ChatGPT has become a popular source of information online. Physicians need to be aware of the resources their patients are using to self-inform of their conditions. This study investigates physician-graded accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT regarding various questions patients are likely to ask the artificial intelligence (AI) system concerning common upper limb orthopedic conditions. METHODS: ChatGPT 3.5 was interrogated concerning 5 common orthopedic hand conditions: carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, De Quervain tenosynovitis, trigger finger, and carpal metacarpal arthritis. Questions evaluated conditions' symptoms, pathology, management, surgical indications, recovery time, insurance coverage, and workers' compensation possibility. Each topic had 12 to 15 questions and was established as its own ChatGPT conversation. All questions regarding the same diagnosis were presented to the AI, and its answers were recorded. Each question was then graded for both accuracy (Likert scale of 1-6) and completeness (Likert scale of 1-3) by 10 fellowship trained hand surgeons. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the mean accuracy score for ChatGPT's answers to common orthopedic hand diagnoses was 4.83 out of 6 ± 0.95. The mean completeness of answers was 2 out of 3 ± 0.59. CONCLUSIONS: Easily accessible online AI such as ChatGPT is becoming more advanced and thus more reliable in its ability to answer common medical questions. Physicians can anticipate such online resources being mostly correct, however incomplete. Patients should beware of relying on such resources in isolation.

The Outcomes of 2,154 Endoscopic Trigger Finger Releases.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is one of the most frequent causes of hand pain and disability. Recently, an endoscopic trigger finger release technique was developed, but outcomes have rarely been reported. Here, we present the outcomes of 2154 endoscopic trigger finger release procedures in a single center. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 2154 endoscopic trigger finger release procedures were performed on 2034 patients. Outcome assessment at 90 days after surgery was classified as excellent, good, fair or poor according to a combination of patient satisfaction with the scar and pain at rest or under load on a numeric rating scale. RESULTS: The therapeutic outcomes were: 1027 excellent, 607 good, 400 fair, and none poor. No major surgical complications were observed. Minor complications occurred in 231 fingers (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: All patients were satisfied with their outcome after endoscopic trigger finger release. Endoscopic release can be an effective and efficient therapeutic method for the treatment of trigger finger.

Serious Complications of the Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release: Case Reports and Literature Review.

Percutaneous first annular pulley (A1 pulley) release, which has been increasingly used to treat trigger fingers, has been widely established as a safe and simple procedure. Multiple studies have reported positive results of percutaneous A1 pulley release. In this study, however, we report cases of patients who developed complications after undergoing percutaneous A1 pulley release at local clinics. A total of six patients visited our hospital for infectious complications after percutaneous A1 pulley release. Various sequelae such as damage to normal structures, insufficient procedure, and tissue necrosis were observed during the exploration. A retrospective study was conducted to identify the cause and trend of the observed complications by instruments (HAKI knife or needle). In the HAKI knife group, there was a tendency for damage to normal structures, while in the needle group, an insufficient release or serious soft tissue necrosis was observed. Based on these cases, our findings confirm the existence and characteristics of infectious complications following the percutaneous A1 pulley release. We further identify that the type of instrument used predicts the nature of complications. Thus, reliable and skilled performance of the procedure by experts is essential for safe treatment.

Trigger Thumb, Trigger Finger and Clasped Thumb.

Finger deformities are a common reason for medical observation in children. Subtle clinical differences can have a significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Identification of the basic diagnostic and treatment principles of trigger thumb, trigger finger, and clasped thumb is of paramount importance to all general practitioners, pediatricians, and orthopedic surgeons who are involved in the care of children. The purpose of this article is to review the most important concepts regarding these important topics, focusing on etiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

A Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Between Patients Receiving Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Slip Excision or Isolated A1 Pulley Release for Trigger Finger.

PURPOSE: Resection of the radial or ulnar slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon is a known treatment option for persistent trigger finger. Risk factors for undergoing FDS slip excision are unclear. We hypothesized that patients who underwent A1 pulley release with FDS slip excision secondary to persistent triggering would have a higher comorbidity burden compared to those receiving A1 pulley release alone. METHODS: We identified all adult patients who underwent A1 pulley release with FDS slip excision because of persistent triggering either intraoperatively or postoperatively from 2018 to 2023. We selected a 3:1 age- and sex-matched control group who underwent isolated A1 pulley release. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, selected comorbidities, trigger finger history, and postoperative course. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the probability of FDS slip excision after adjusting for several variables that were significant in bivariate comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 48 patients who underwent A1 pulley release with FDS slip excision and 144 controls. Our multivariable model showed that patients with additional trigger fingers and a preoperative proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint contracture were significantly more likely to undergo FDS slip excision. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent A1 pulley release with FDS slip excision were significantly more likely to have multiple trigger fingers or a preoperative PIP joint contracture. Clinicians should counsel patients with these risk factors regarding the potential for FDS slip excision in addition to A1 pulley release to alleviate triggering of the affected digit. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Surgical treatment of trigger finger: a comparative study of A1 pulley opening versus ulnar superficialis slip resection.

Trigger finger is a common condition. Surgery most frequently involves opening the A0 and A1 pulleys. However, this shows limited effectiveness in correcting proximal interphalangeal joint fixed flexion deformity. The present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between two surgical techniques for trigger finger treatment. This retrospective study included 127 patients, 72 of whom underwent resection of the ulnar slip of the flexor superficialis, and 55 underwent opening of the pulleys. Study data comprised patient characteristics, range of motion, proximal interphalangeal fixed flexion deformity measurement, Quick-DASH and PRWE scores, and overall satisfaction. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of Quick-DASH or PRWE scores. Fixed flexion deformity correction was slightly but not significantly better with resection of the ulnar slip of the flexor superficialis (100%) compared to opening of the pulleys (88%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Level IV.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although corticosteroid injections are an effective treatment for musculoskeletal pathologies, they may not be suitable for all patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received NSAID and corticosteroid injections for various orthopedic conditions. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model for outcomes presented in three or more studies. Other studies were qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 28 articles with 2113 patients were included. A meta-analysis of five studies in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) between subacromial NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections at 1 month [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.244; 95% CI, -1.232 to 0.745; I2, 94.5%]. For patients with knee osteoarthritis, a meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated that there was no significant difference between intraarticular NSAID injections and corticosteroid injections in pain VAS at 1 month (WMD 0.754; 95% CI, -0.413 to 1.921; I2, 90.2%) and 3 months (WMD-0.089; 95% CI, -0.345 to 0.166; I2, 0%). A review of the studies assessing pain outcomes for hip osteoarthritis, adhesive capsulitis, and plantar fasciitis showed no significant differences between the NSAID and corticosteroid groups. CONCLUSION: NSAID injections may be safe and effective alternatives to steroid injections, especially in shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis.

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection for Unfavourable Results after Trigger Finger Release.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ulnar superficial slip resection (USSR) for improving hand function after unfavourable results after triggering finger release using a minimally invasive approach. Methods: We evaluated 17 consecutive fingers of 16 patients who complained of unfavourable outcomes after primary trigger finger release. The chief complaints of the two index and 15 middle fingers were proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint pain during movement, flexion contracture of the PIP joint and snapping at the A2 pulley in eight, seven and two fingers, respectively. The joint arc of the active range of motion and extension loss of the PIP joint, grip strength, visual analogue score (VAS) of PIP joint pain and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand were evaluated before and after surgery. Results: Thirteen fingers could release joint contracture and snapping by the USSR procedure. However, four fingers of three patients required total flexor digitorum superficialis resection to resolve the unsatisfactory conditions of the intraoperative decision. The joint arc of active range of motion and extension loss of the PIP joint, grip strength and VAS score significantly improved (mean of 16.1 months follow-up). Finally, 15 patients (88.2%) were satisfied with the symptom relief outcomes. Conclusions: USSR is an effective and satisfactory procedure for unfavourable conditions after trigger finger release, including PIP joint pain, joint contracture and snapping at the A2 pulley. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

A Novel Surgical Technique Using a Hockey Stick-Like Guided Knife to Go Through the Eyes of a Needle for Trigger Finger.

Trigger finger surgery is primarily managed with open surgery accompanied by 10-14 days of postoperative recovery, which may interrupt activities of daily living. In the past, we attempted to perform percutaneous surgery by inserting a hockey stick-shaped guide knife through a scalpel incision several millimeters long. Sometimes, we encounter difficult cases wherein triggering does not disappear despite repeated attempts to release the A1 pulley through the small incision, thus forcing us to extend the incision. As a result, the postoperative recovery is sometimes prolonged. We describe our experience using a novel percutaneous procedure in which a guide knife was inserted through one or two 20-gauge needle holes, instead of a scalpel skin incision, to release the A1 pulley. We describe a new method that minimizes skin and soft tissue damage and reliably shortens posttreatment recovery.