Obesity as an independent risk factor for poor long-term outcome after mid-urethral sling surgery.

INTRODUCTION: High body mass index (BMI) is a risk-factor for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery is an effective treatment of SUI. The aim of this study was to investigate if there is an association between BMI at time of MUS-surgery and the long-term outcome at 10 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women who went through MUS surgery in Sweden between 2006 and 2010 and had been registered in the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery were invited to participate in the 10-year follow-up. A questionnaire was sent out asking if they were currently suffering from SUI or not and their rated satisfaction, as well as current BMI. SUI at 10 years was correlated to BMI at the time of surgery. SUI at 1 year was assessed by the postoperative questionnaire sent out by the registry. The primary aim of the study was to investigate if there is an association between BMI at surgery and the long-term outcome, subjective SUI at 10 years after MUS surgery. Our secondary aims were to assess whether BMI at surgery is associated with subjective SUI at 1-year follow-up and satisfaction at 10-year follow-up. RESULTS: The subjective cure rate after 10 years was reported by 2108 out of 2157 women. Higher BMI at the time of surgery turned out to be a risk factor for SUI at long-term follow-up. Women with BMI <25 reported subjective SUI in 30%, those with BMI 25-<30 in 40%, those with BMI 30-<35 in 47% and those with BMI ≥35 in 59% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, subjective SUI at 1 year was reported higher by women with BMI ≥30, than among women with BMI <30 (33% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Satisfaction at 10-year follow-up was 82% among women with BMI <30 vs 63% if BMI ≥30 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher BMI at the time of MUS surgery is a risk factor for short- and long-term failure compared to normal BMI.

Perceived health status after mid-urethral sling revision in 287 women from the VIGI-MESH registry: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health status and recovery of women after mid-urethral sling (MUS) revision in response to complications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire sent to women from a registry. SETTING: Twenty-two French surgical centres. POPULATION: A total of 287 women from the VIGI-MESH registry responded, having undergone MUS revision for complications. METHODS: Our sample of women were compared against a representative set of French women taken from the Eurostat database. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors for successful MUS revision. A qualitative analysis was carried out on free-text comments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status, defined by the Minimum European Health Module, and recovery, assessed by Patient Global Impression of Improvement. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (287/378), with 49% of the women (141/287, 95% CI 43%-55%) reporting good health status, which was 8 points lower than that expected from the comparator French set (57%, 95% CI 55%-58%). Overall, 53% (147/275, 95% CI 47%-59%) of the women reported feeling much better after MUS revision. Just over one-third (35%, 95/275, 95% CI 29%-40%) of respondents reported poor health with little or no improvement. Multivariate analysis showed that being operated on for pain at revision was associated with worse self-perceived health than being operated on for exposure (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.14-0.95); women with pre-existing comorbidity reported a poorer health status following MUS revision (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that half of the women recovered good health status after MUS revision, whereas a proportion appeared to be seriously affected by an MUS complication despite the revision.

The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on stress urinary incontinence in women previously submitted to mid-urethral sling: A systematic review and metanalysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is no guideline or clinical consensus concerning the mid-urethral sling (MUS) operation for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and future pregnancies. The aim of this systematic review and metanalysis is to evaluate the impact of pregnancy and of delivery on SUI in women who previously sustained a MUS surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, and selected seven publications for inclusion in the analysis. RESULTS: Recurrence of SUI after childbirth in women previously submitted to MUS was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.0%-26.0%; I2 = 0%) while the reintervention rate for SUI the 5% (95% CI: 2.0%-8.0%; I2 = 47.34%) in the included studies. There was not statistically significant difference between women who delivered (both vaginally and by caesarian section) or not after MUS in SUI recurrence (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.73-1.40; p = 0.96 and I2-test of 41% p = 0.18) and in SUI reintervention (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.91-2.30; p = 0.12 and I2-test of 0% p = 0.38) with homogeneity among studies. There was no difference between women who delivered vaginally or by caesarian section both for recurrence of SUI (RR 1.24, 95%CI 0.77-2.01; p = 0.37 and I2-test of 0% p = 0.60) and reintervention (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.76-3.42; p = 0.22 and I2-test of 0% p = 0.47). BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, urinary incontinence (UI) before and during pregnancy emerged as risk factors for postpartum UI relapse. CONCLUSION: Childbirth do not affect SUI relapse or reintervention in women previously submitted to MUS. In the same population of patients, no difference was highlighted concerning the mode of delivery for the outcome SUI relapse or reintervention. Previous MUS surgery may not be an appropriate indication for cesarean birth in subsequent pregnancy.

Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study.

Introduction: It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results. Material and methods: The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined. Results: 142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively. Conclusions: The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.

Laser excision of urethral mesh erosion: a 10-year experience.

PURPOSE: To review our 10-year experience with laser excision for urethral mesh erosion (UME) of mid-urethral slings (MUS). METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, the charts of female patients with endoscopic laser excision of UME were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, clinical presentation, surgical history, pre- and post-operative Urinary Distress Inventory-6 scores and quality of life ratings, operative reports, and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. UME cure was defined as no residual mesh on office cystourethroscopy 5-6 months after the final laser excision procedure. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2021, 23 patients met study criteria; median age was 56 (range 44-79) years. Twenty (87%) had multiple prior urogynecologic procedures. Median time from MUS placement to presentation with UME-related complaints was 5.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.3-7.6] years. The most common presenting symptom was recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) (n = 10). Median operating time was 49 (IQR 37-80) minutes. Median duration of follow-up was 24 (IQR 12-84) months. Fourteen (61%) required more than 1 laser excision procedure for UME. Although 5 were asymptomatic (22%), new (n = 5) or persistent (n = 8) urinary incontinence was the most common symptom on follow-up (57%). CONCLUSION: UME presenting symptoms are highly variable, necessitating a high index of suspicion in patients with a history of MUS, especially in the case of rUTI. Endoscopic laser excision is a minimally invasive, brief, safe, outpatient procedure with a high UME cure rate.

Mid-term results of ReMEEX sling system in female stress urinary incontinence with various indications and feasibility of readjustment.

PURPOSE: To examine efficacy and safety of ReMEEX implantation in patients with female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) associated with detrusor underactivity (DU), recurrence, or intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study included 303 females who underwent ReMEEX system (March 2008 to May 2021). Patients were stratified into three groups by purpose of surgery (SUI with DU, reoperation, and SUI with ISD) and evaluated with following criteria: cure (absence of subjective complaint of leakage and objective leakage in the stress test), improvement (rare leakage subjectively, but satisfaction regardless of stress test), and failure. Primary outcome was success rate of surgery assessed through patient interviews and a stress test. Surgical outcomes and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 34.4 months (range, 6.0-145.0 months). At the final follow-up visit, 42.9% and 49.2% of patients were cured and improved. Twenty-one point five percent required tension readjustment (mean number, 1.2). The total complication rate was 19.5% (none for grade ≥4). Preoperative Qmax was significantly higher in the ISD group (p<0.001) and preoperative total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score was significantly higher in the DU group (p=0.044). Moreover, at postoperative 1 year, both total IPSS score and IPSS quality of life score were significantly higher in the DU group (both p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of ReMEEX system was 92.1% at mean follow-up of 34.4 months in female SUI with DU, reoperation, or ISD. It also enabled postoperative readjustment of sling tension, as needed, up to 130 months after surgery.

A Full Bladder Is Not Needed for the Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale.

INTRODUCTION: Our objectives were to evaluate the Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale to stratify male patients with stress urinary incontinence for either artificial urinary sphincter or sling using a standing cough test and determine if an emptier bladder at the time of assessment carries increased risk of treatment failure. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of male patients undergoing sling and artificial urinary sphincter placement. The standing cough test score and bladder scan results were documented at initial evaluation. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent sling and 43 underwent naïve artificial sphincter placement. Median follow-up was 7.11 months. Thirty-six/forty slings had complete incontinence resolution or reduction to a safety pad vs 40/43 after sphincter (90% vs 93%, P = .62). Four sling patients (10%) had persistence or recurrence of incontinence. Cough test scores were similar between sling failure (67% grade 0, 33% grade 1) and success groups (83% grade 0, 3% grade 1, 14% grade 2). Bladder scan mean was 18.5 cc in the sling failure (SD 21.1) and 38.0 cc in the success groups (38.3), with 32% of success patients having bladder scans of 0 cc, and 63% of < 50 cc. Mean for sphincter patients was 45 cc (56.9). Ten patients with scan = 0 and 7 patients with scans < 30 cc demonstrated grade 4 incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Cough test is a noninvasive, reliable tool to assess stress urinary incontinence severity. Our data suggest it is reliable even when bladders are nearly empty and can effectively stratify patients for sling vs artificial urinary sphincter with a high rate of success.

Mesh Extraction Surgery and Laser Treatment for Pain After Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery: A Case Series.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the leakage of urine due to abdominal pressure. The primary surgical approach involves the insertion of a mid-urethral sling (MUS) with a mesh, which can occasionally lead to post-operative pain. To address complications, MUS removal is often necessary. We hypothesize that a non-ablative erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser combined with vagina (vaginal erbium laser (VEL)) and urethra (urethra erbium laser (UEL)) treatments could be a post-MUS removal option. A study involving laser treatment started in 2016 for women with recurrent SUI one year after MUS removal who were not affected by pelvic floor muscle exercises and who did not wish to have MUS reinsertion or urethral injection treatment. Five patients (mean age, 54.5 ± 9.35 years) were enrolled, all receiving laser therapy. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain as a primary endpoint, and the one-hour pad test was performed for SUI as a secondary endpoint. The mean pain VAS score changed from 8.57 ± 0.69 to 2.29 ± 1.50 (p = 0.00002) after MUS removal. Furthermore, the VAS score was 0 (p = 0.0034) after VEL + UEL. SUI changed from 4.42 ± 2.9 g on the one-hour pad test during MUS insertion to 66.7 ± 39.0 (p = 0.005) after removal. However, after the VEL + UEL treatment, it was 3.71 ± 5.25 g (p = 0.0035). The pathological tissue collected from the five patients at the time of MUS removal surgery had vacuolization in the part where the artificial material was present in the specimen, with foreign-body giant cells proliferated around it. One year after the MUS removal, mucous membrane regeneration was poor, and tissue thickness was thin. One year after the VEL + UEL treatment, the tissue had normalized mucosa, and there was no inflammation. Our study suggests MUS extraction and VEL + UEL as viable options for treating MUS pain in women.

Continence Is Not Affected after Sling Revision with Transvaginal Tape Elongation for Post-Sling Voiding Dysfunction.

Voiding dysfunction (VD) after sling operation is not uncommon. Sling revisions by incision/excision are usually effective; however, they may result in recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to evaluate continence status after an innovative sling revision procedure that preserves the integrity of the sling. Patients who underwent either a single-incision (AJUST) or a trans-obturator (TVT-O) mid-urethral sling were studied. Transvaginal tape elongation (i.e., sling midline incision and mesh interposition) was performed on patients with post-sling VD. Factors that may affect recurrent SUI were investigated by statistical analyses. Of 119 patients, 90 (75.6%) (45 AJUST and 45 TVT-O) were available for long-term (median 9; 8-10 years) follow-up. A significantly higher rate (17.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.014) of VD was noted after AJUST (N = 10) than after TVT-O (N = 2). After sling revision, four (33%) of the 12 cases reported recurrent SUI, which was not significantly different (p = 1.000) from the rate (37%, 29/78) of patients who did not undergo sling revision. Further statistical analyses revealed no significant predisposing factors affecting the recurrence of SUI. Surgical continence did not seem to be affected by having had sling revision with transvaginal tape elongation for post-sling VD.

Does vaginal surgery for correction of pelvic organ prolapse improve urinary function? A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is caused by an imbalance in the stability of the pelvic organs, resulting in loss of support. The most common types of POP, anterior and apical, are associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as bladder outlet obstruction and detrusor overactivity (DO). Vaginal surgery may improve LUTS and overall urinary symptoms. We assessed urodynamic (UD) parameters and urinary symptoms before and after vaginal surgery for POP correction. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 59 women with symptomatic anterior and/or apical POP associated with urinary symptoms and with indications for vaginal surgery were included. POP surgeries included anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy with culdoplasty (VH) and with/without concomitant posterior colporrhaphy and mid-urethral sling (MUS). All participants underwent UD evaluation and answered urinary symptom questionnaires pre- and 3 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Anterior colporrhaphy was performed in all patients: 45.7% with associated VH and 54.2% with concomitant MUS. Preoperative ICIQ-OAB score >8 points was significantly associated with DO (p<0.02) and decreased after surgery (9±4.3 to 3.2±3.0, p<0.001). All other questionnaires demonstrated improvements in urinary symptoms. Stress urinary incontinence rate decreased from 59.6% to 21% (p<0.001). Post-void residual (PVR) volume and Valsalva maneuver also decreased (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic organ prolapse surgery reduced the prevalence of urgency symptoms, and all questionnaires on urinary symptoms showed clinically significant improvement. Vaginal surgery for POP, even combined with MUS, significantly reduced PVR volume and improved urgency symptoms.

Dyspareunia and pelvic pain: comparison of mid-urethral sling methods 10 years after insertion.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The mid-urethral sling (MUS) has been used for more than 30 years to cure stress urinary incontinence. The objective of this study was to assess whether surgical technique affects the outcome after more than ten years, regarding dyspareunia and pelvic pain. METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study we used the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery to identify women who underwent MUS surgery in the period 2006-2010. Out of 4348 eligible women, 2555 (59%) responded to the questionnaire sent out in 2020-2021. The two main surgical techniques, the retropubic and the obturatoric approach, were represented by 1562 and 859 women respectively. The Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), as well as general questions concerning the MUS surgery, were sent out to the study population. Dyspareunia and pelvic pain were defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included PISQ-12, general satisfaction, and self-reported problems due to sling insertion. RESULTS: A total of 2421 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 71% responded to questions regarding dyspareunia and 77% responded to questions regarding pelvic pain. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the primary outcomes, we found no difference in reported dyspareunia (15% vs 17%, odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.5) or in reported pelvic pain (17% vs 18%, OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3) between the retropubic and obturatoric techniques among study responders. CONCLUSION: Dyspareunia and pelvic pain 10-14 years after insertion of a MUS do not differ with respect to surgical technique.

A new promising approach to urodynamic stress urinary incontinence care can help menopausal women.

Introduction: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision mini-sling in the surgical treatment of postmenopausal urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to the standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling. Material and methods: This prospective study was carried out in two tertiary centres; Al-Azhar University Maternity & Urology Hospitals. A total of 120 postmenopausal women with urodynamic SUI were randomized to undergo either single-incision mini-sling (n = 60) or standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling procedure (n = 60) from May 2019 until Oct 2021. Main outcome measures: efficacy was evaluated utilizing objective cure rate (cough stress test) and subjective cure rate (Sandvik incontinence severity index and International Consultations on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative pain (using a visual analogue scale). Results: The single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) and transobturator tape (TOT) groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (p > 0.05). Compared with the transvaginal tape O group, patients in the SIMS group had significantly less postoperative pain, shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (all p-values < 0.05). No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between both groups. Conclusions: Single-incision mini-sling was superior to TOT in postmenopausal as SIMS is of similar effectiveness, more safe and minimally invasive with earlier ambulance.

Guiding Clinical Decision Making for Surgical Incontinence Treatment After Prostatectomy: A Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy is a common and debilitating side effect. Immediate post-prostatectomy management emphasizes pelvic floor muscle exercises. Per American Urologic Association guidelines, if incontinence persists for more than 12 months postoperatively, surgical interventions are the mainstay of treatment. Treatment decisions depend on a multitude of factors. The goal of this paper is to review recent literature updates regarding the diagnosis of male SUI to better guide surgical treatment decision-making. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient history is a critical component in guiding surgical decision making with severity and bother being primary factors driving treatment decisions. Recent studies indicate that a history of pelvic radiation continues to impact the overall duration and complication rate associated with artificial urinary sphincters (AUS). Cystoscopy should be done on every patient preparing to undergo surgical SUI treatment. Urodynamics and standing cough stress tests are additional diagnostic testing options; these tests may augment the diagnosis of SUI and better delineate which patients may benefit from a male sling versus AUS. Treatment of SUI after prostatectomy can improve health-related quality of life. A patient history focused on severity and degree of bother in addition to the use of ancillary office testing can help guide surgical treatment decisions to optimize patient continence goals.

The transvaginal mesh class action: a tertiary teaching hospital experience of all mid-urethral sling procedures performed between 1999 and 2017.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Class action against Ethicon (J&J), manufacturer of transvaginal mesh devices, including mid-urethral slings (MUS), was brought to the Federal Court of Australia in 2016 by Shine Lawyers. As a result, subpoenas to all hospitals and networks were received, which overrode patient privacy concerns. This medical record search allowed a complete audit and communication with patients to offer clinical review. This enabled a review of complications, readmission and re-operation for women who underwent a MUS for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: A cohort study of women who underwent MUS treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at a single tertiary teaching hospital between 1999 and 2017 was carried out. The main outcome measures were the rate of readmission and re-operation following MUS procedures. These include voiding dysfunction managed by sling loosening or sling division, mesh pain or exposure managed by mesh removal and reoperation for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2017, a total of 1,462 women were identified as having a MUS; of these, 1,195 (81.7%) had full patient records available. Voiding dysfunction requiring surgical intervention with sling loosening or division was 3%, excision for mesh exposure was 2%, and partial or complete excision for pain was 1% at a median of 10 years from index surgery. The reoperation rate for recurrent stress urinary incontinence was 3%. CONCLUSION(S): This audit of all MUS procedures performed at a tertiary centre confirms an overall low rate of readmission for complications and recurrent SUI surgery; this justifies its continued availability with appropriate informed consent.

A narrative review: evaluation and surgical management of persistent and recurrent urinary incontinence after previous surgical treatment.

Background and Objective: Urinary incontinence after prostate treatment is associated with significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. Stress urinary incontinence can be treated by insertion of a urethral sling or artificial urinary sphincter. Persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence after such treatment can be frustrating and require specific evaluation and approach to management to optimize chance of successful outcomes and patient satisfaction whilst avoiding further patient morbidity. The aim of this review is to outline the evaluation and management of persistent and recurrent urinary incontinence in men after previous surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence by way of narrative review. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar between 2010 to 2023. The search strategy included the following MeSH terms: device, men, urinary incontinence, persistence, recurrence, and revision. A total of 140 English-language articles were identified and reviewed; 68 articles were considered relevant to the aims and the findings have been outlined in this narrative review. Key Content and Findings: There are many approaches currently practiced by surgeons in continence revision surgery. There is not clear consensus regarding optimum revision strategy for persistent and recurrent incontinence post urethral sling and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Whilst small observational studies have reviewed different surgical approaches, there is a paucity of high volume comparative data from which to draw conclusions. However, there have been recent studies enabling a paradigm shift in the understanding of incontinence post artificial urinary sphincter insertion that may lead to improved revision strategies in future. Conclusions: There are various surgical modalities used to manage incontinence following urethral sling and artificial urinary sphincter insertion. There is currently no clear consensus on the optimal surgical technique for persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence after surgery. Further comparative studies would be beneficial to help guide surgeons as to which revision approaches would be suitable for select patients.

Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success.

Purpose: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. Methods: A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACTTM system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. Results: Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0-1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73-93% vs 70-90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems.

Tape-Releasing Suture with "Long Loop" on Mid-Urethral Sling: A Novel Procedure for Management of Iatrogenic Urethral Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: To report our experiences of a tape-releasing suture with "long-loop" in women with iatrogenic urethral obstruction following the mid-urethral sling procedure. METHODS: A total of 149 women underwent a tape-releasing suture with "Long Loop" during the operation. Post-void residual volume was evaluated after Foley removal. Lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic studies were assessed before and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Nine women out of 149 who underwent mid-urethral sling surgery were found to have iatrogenic urethral obstruction post-operatively based on their urinary symptoms and ultrasound findings. There was no apparent difference between tested groups in mid-urethral sling products and concomitant procedures. 77.8% had successful releases after the first Long-loop manipulation procedure, and 22.2% required two or more releases. However, the SUI cure rate is similar in groups receiving the Long-loop manipulation or not (88.9% and 87.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We are convinced of the practicability and efficacy of the tape-releasing suture "Long-loop." We adopted subjective and objective means to evaluate both groups before and after a six-month follow-up. The Long-loop manipulation procedure can successfully resolve the iatrogenic urethral obstruction without compromising the effectiveness of mid-urethral sling for the treatment of SUI.

Single Incision Mini-Sling Versus Mid-Urethral Sling (Transobturator/Retropubic) in Females With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Stress urine incontinence (SUI) is most common in middle-aged women and the second most common in those over 75. SUI causes significant discomfort and suffering for patients and has a considerable financial impact on the healthcare system. Conservative approaches are recommended as the first step in treatment. However, surgery is often necessary to improve a patient's quality of life due to the high failure rate of conservative treatments. A thorough literature review of studies published before March 2023 was conducted on the safety and effectiveness of single-incision mini slings (SIMS) and standard mid-urethral slings (MUS). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect were used to retrieve the studies. Two reviewers independently searched and evaluated the data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Included were seventeen studies involving 3,503 female SUI patients without intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) or mixed urinary incontinence. According to the results of our meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy of SIMS is comparable to that of MUS in terms of objective cure rate (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.03, p: 0.66, I2: 29%). In contrast, it increases the post-procedure International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) score (WMD: 0.08; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.08). CI: -0.02 to 0.18, p: 0.11, I2: 55%) and improves the PGI-I score to a greater extent (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.08, p: 0.36, I2: 76%). In contrast, there is no difference between the two groups regarding patient satisfaction (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.01, p: 0.16, I2: 0%) and Sandvik score reduction (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p: 0.35, I2: 0%). In conclusion, single-incision mid-urethral slings (SIMS) are as effective as mid-urethral slings (MUS) for treating pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) without intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), with a shorter operation time. However, the SIMS procedure has a higher incidence of dyspareunia. At the same time, bladder perforation, mesh-related complications, pelvic/groin pain, urinary tract infection (UTI), worsening urgency, dysuria, and pain score are less likely to occur with SIMS. Only the decrease in pelvic/groin pain was statistically significant.

Return to work and normal activities after mid-urethral sling: secondary analysis of the Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aim to evaluate the timing of patients returning to work and to normal daily life following mid-urethral sling surgery. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS). Our primary outcome is the timing of return to work and normal activities. Secondary outcomes included paid days off, number of days to return to normal daily life, and objective and subjective failures. Predictors affecting the timing of return to work and normal activities were also assessed. Patients who underwent concomitant surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing a mid-urethral sling, 183 (41.5%) returned to normal activities within 2 weeks. Within 6 weeks of surgery, 308 (70.0%) had returned to normal activities including work. At the 6-month follow-up, 407 (98.3%) had returned to normal activities including work. Patients took a median of 14 days (interquartile range 1-115 days) to return to normal activities including work and took a median of 5 (interquartile range 0-42 days) paid work days off. Those who returned within 2 weeks versus after 2 weeks did not have significantly different characteristics, or failure and complication rates. In the multivariate regression analysis, there was no significant predictor of the timing of returning to normal activity/work. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of patients returned to work and normal activities within 2 weeks of a mid-urethral sling surgery and took many fewer paid days off. The timing of return to work was not associated with significant differences in treatment failure or adverse outcomes.

Complications following retropubic versus transobturator midurethral synthetic sling placement.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Transobturator slings (TOS) are inferior to retropubic slings (RPS) based on long-term outcomes; data on complications is critical for patient counseling. We hypothesized rates of urinary retention would be higher for RPS, while pain and repeat sling surgery would be higher for TOS. METHODS: Using the Premier healthcare database we identified encounters for patients undergoing a midurethral sling procedure between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified by sling type, either RPS or TOS. The primary outcome was the difference in the composite complication rate between groups within 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2-test for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for complications and risk of specific complications after sling placement. RESULTS: 36,991 patients were included in the RPS group and 16,371 in the TOS group. 7,880 patients (14.8%) had at least one sling specific complication. On multivariable logistic regression, RPS patients were more likely to have urinary retention (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.16-1.43), sling lysis/excision (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.10-1.53), and hematoma/hemorrhage (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.16-2.86); they were less likely to have a UTI (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.96) or repeat sling (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.46-0.78). In patients with urinary retention, RPS patients were more likely to undergo sling lysis than TOS (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Significant complications after midurethral synthetic sling are overall rare. RPS are associated with a higher rate of perioperative bleeding and sling lysis/excision due to urinary retention, but less likely to be associated with UTI and treatment failure.