Treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction of ustekinumab compared with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is an interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: This real-world study compared ustekinumab and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients. METHODS: Patient health records of 110 moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients initiating or switching biologics were reviewed, with 31 patients receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab group) and 79 patients receiving TNFis (TNFi group). RESULTS: Compared with TNFi group, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75 response rate at month 6 (M6) were elevated (87.1% versus 65.8%, p = 0.026) in the ustekinumab group, whereas the rates at month 1 (M1) and month 3 (M3) and PASI-90 response rates at M1, M3, and M6 only showed an increasing trend (all p > 0.050) in the ustekinumab group than the TNFi group. By subgroup analyses, ustekinumab (versus TNFi) was more effective in patients with biologics therapy history than those without. Compared with the TNFi group, the ustekinumab group had lower dermatology life quality index scores and higher patient satisfaction scores at M3 and M6 (all p < 0.050). CONCLUSION: Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab have a better treatment response at 6 months with improved quality of life and patient satisfaction after 3-6 months of treatment when compared to TNFi.

New Ustekinumab Biosimilar Candidate FYB202: Pharmacokinetic Equivalence Demonstrated in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Single-Dose Trial in Healthy Subjects.

In the RUSTIC trial, pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between the proposed ustekinumab biosimilar FYB202 and EU-approved (EU-Ref) and US-licensed ustekinumab (US-Ref) as well as between both reference drugs was assessed after a single 45-mg subcutaneous injection. Safety analyses comprised immunogenicity (antidrug antibodies, neutralizing antibodies), adverse events, and local tolerability. Overall, 491 healthy adults were randomized 1:1:1 and observed for up to 112 days; 486 completed the trial, and 478 were included in the PK analysis. All 3 comparisons showed PK similarity, since the 90% confidence intervals of the respective geometric mean ratios for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum serum concentration were contained within the acceptance interval of 80%-125%. No clinically meaningful differences regarding overall safety, immunogenicity, and local tolerability were observed. Notably, after FYB202 administration, in fewer subjects at least 1 positive antidrug antibody result was observed compared to the reference groups (FYB202, 20%; EU-Ref, 42%; US-Ref, 51%). In conclusion, the RUSTIC trial demonstrated equivalent PK characteristics for FYB202 when compared to both EU-Ref and US-Ref ustekinumab and between both reference drugs. It provides the basis for the marketing authorization of FYB202, together with an extensive analytical characterization and the results of a confirmatory efficacy and safety trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Recent clinical evidence on nutrition, novel pharmacotherapy, and vaccination in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which enclose Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing inflammatory ailments. Their specific pathogenesis is not completely clarified, the worldwide incidence and prevalence of IBD has been steadily growing, and there is still not a definitive cure. The management of IBD has become more and more targeted, with specific immune mediators identified to be involved in its pathogenesis. Vedolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody binding specifically to the α4ß7 integrin, is a gut-selective immunosuppressive biologic drug administered for both CD and UC. With the same indications as vedolizumab, ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody binding with specificity to the shared p40 protein subunit of human cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23. Several selective IL-23p19 monoclonal antibodies (risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab) have also revealed admirable efficacy and safety in IBD patients. Nutrition is a very important environmental factor associated with the onset and progression of IBD, and the Western diet is considered to contribute to the development of IBD. In this narrative review, our aim is to present an overview of the main results from recent clinical studies on IBD regarding diet, new drug treatments, and also vaccination.

Induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in Crohn's disease with ustekinumab in clinical practice across all care levels in Germany (MUCUS).

The impact of ustekinumab (UST) on mucosal- and fistula healing and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in Crohn's disease (CD) were not fully elucidated in the registration trials. In this prospective, multicenter study (EudraCT number: 2017-005151-83) we evaluated the German label real-world-effectiveness of UST to achieve the primary endpoint of combined clinical and endoscopic response at week 52 and several secondary endpoints. Of 79 screened we enrolled 52 patients (female n = 28, bionaïve n = 13, biologic n = 39). At week 52 (per protocol analysis), 52% (n = 13/25) of patients achieved the primary endpoint [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 45.5% (n = 5/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8 ) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively with age as independent predictor [OR 95% CI 0.933 (0.873, 0.998) p = 0.043], 60% (n = 15/25) achieved endoscopic response [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 54.5% (n = 6/11) biologic, 75% (n = 6/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 36% (n = 9/25) achieved endoscopic remission [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 27.3% (n = 3/11) biologic, 37.5% (n = 3/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively], 48% (n = 12/25) achieved mucosal healing [50% (n = 3/6) in the bionaïve, 36.4% (n = 4/11) biologic, 62.5% (n = 5/8) multiple biologics cohorts, respectively]. All achieved a fistula response and 33.3% (n = 1/3) in the multiple biologics group fistula remission at week 52. EIM decreased (week 0 28.2% vs. week 52 8%). CRP, FCP, PRO-2, EQ-5D-5L improved throughout. 36 patients (69.2%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment emergent adverse event, in 8 (15.4%) cases rated as severe and in 5 (9.6%) leading to UST discontinuation, but no very severe events or deaths. The effectiveness of UST was better than in the registration trials.

A Case of Ulcerative Colitis During Pregnancy and Childbirth at an Older Age While on Biologic Therapy.

There is considerable uncertainty regarding the safety and efficacy of biological therapies during pregnancy. We report a case of a 46-year-old female, diagnosed with ulcerative colitis over 30 years ago, who was successfully managed with infliximab and ustekinumab. She experienced no exacerbation of her condition during two pregnancies, demonstrating the safety of biologic therapy in maintaining disease remission during pregnancy. This case report highlights successful outcomes despite the uncertainties associated with biologic therapy during pregnancy and includes a brief review of the relevant literature.

Optimizing outcomes with maintenance IV UST in highly bio-exposed patients with IBD. Efficacy and Adjusted Regimen in Real World.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ustekinumab is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases. However, some patients do not respond to conventional doses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous maintenance Ustekinumab in patients with secondary failure. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study in adult patients with intravenous maintenance ustekinumab. The reduction of biochemical activity markers, ustekinumab trough levels and clinical indices of activity were evaluated. Biological remission was defined as the percentage decrease fecal calprotectin ≥ 80% and/or final fecal calprotectin ≤ 250 and C reactive protein < 5mg/L. RESULTS: 31 patients were included: Crohn's disease 77.4%. All included patients were bio-exposed and 61.3% had carried ≥ 2 biologics. Pre-intravenous maintenance mean Harvey-Bradshaw Index was 6.5±4,38 vs 5±3,1 at week 8 (p=0.024) vs 4.1±3.1 at week 24 (p=0.019). The median ustekinumab trough levels pre-intravenous maintenance were 1.40µg/ml [IQR 2.3] vs 5.35µg/ml [IQR 4.1] at week 8 (p<0.001) vs 4.8µg/ml [IQR 3.9] at week 24 (p<0.001). The pre-intravenous maintenance median fecal calprotectin was 809µg/g [IQR: 2256] vs 423µg/g [IQR: 999] at week 8 (p=0.025) vs 333µg/g [508] (p=0.001) at week 24. At the end of follow-up 48% went into biological remission. The presence of perianal disease was associated with lower biological remission (70.6% vs 27.3%, p=0.025). Median intravenous ustekinumab maintenance time was 8.55 [IQR 23.9] months. In 83.9% of patients no serious infections or malignancy were documented. CONCLUSIONS: The use of maintenance intravenous ustekinumab appears to be an effective and safe strategy that can be evaluated as a salvage treatment especially in highly bioexposed patients.

Low muscle mass is associated with efficacy of biologics in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Low muscle mass (LMM) can be a frequent complication in Crohn's disease (CD). We attempted to explore the effect of LMM on the efficacy of biologics in patients with CD. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included moderate-to-severe CD patients treated with infliximab or ustekinumab, and appendicitis patients as control. The skeletal muscle area (SMA) of L3 was assessed to evaluate the patients' muscle mass. After propensity score matching, the impact of LMM on drug efficacy was assessed in CD patients. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients with CD and 172 appendicitis patients were included. The CD group had lower skeletal muscle density and BMI, and a higher risk of developing LMM than the control group. BMI (OR = 0.48, p < 0.001) and previous use of biologics (OR = 2.94, p = 0.019) were found to be independently associated with LMM. LMM was found to be associated with a decrease in clinical response (at weeks 8-14), clinical remission (at weeks 8-14, 24-30 and 52) and biochemical remission (at week 52). At weeks 24-30 and 52, LMM was independently associated with loss of response (LOR). We found LMM could be a predictor of lower clinical remission at week 30, lower clinical remission at week 52 and a higher LOR rate at week 30 in infliximab. While in ustekinumab, LMM was associated with lower endoscopic remission at week 24, biochemical remission at week 52 and a higher LOR rate at weeks 24 and 52. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of LMM was higher in the CD group compared to the control group. For CD patients with LMM, the efficacy of infliximab and ustekinumab was relatively poor in both the short-term and long-term.

High serum levels of ustekinumab are associated with better clinical outcomes during maintenance treatment for inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective treatment option in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it still remains unclear if therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to guide clinicians. Objectives: The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between UST through levels (USTTL) and clinical outcomes in real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Design: We performed a unicentric retrospective study including patients with IBD under UST treatment with at least one level determination. Methods: The following variables were analyzed at the initiation of UST and at each USTTL measurement: clinical response and remission using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and the Partial Mayo Score (pMayo) for UC; biochemical response and remission using fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein, among others. Two periods were considered: P1 (time between induction and the first determination of USTTL) and P2 (time between USTTL1 and the second determination of USTTL). Results: We included 125 patients, 117 with CD. In P1, 62.4% of patients were on subcutaneous maintenance, and the median USTTL1 was 3.1 µg/mL (1.6-5.3). In 44.8% of CD patients (48/117), clinical remission was achieved, with USTTL1 significantly higher than those who did not achieve remission (3.7 µg/mL (2.3-5.4) vs 2.3 µg/mL (1.1-5.2); p = 0.04). In the 46 patients with two determinations, statistically significant differences were found between variables in P2 versus P1: clinical remission (73.9% vs 21.7%; p = 0.001); USTTL (7.2 µg/mL (4.7-11.7) vs 3.4 µg/mL (1.9-6.4); p < 0.001), HBI (4 (4-4.3) vs 8 (4-9); p < 0.001), pMayo (1 (1-3.3) vs 4.5 (3-5); p = 0.042), and corticosteroid use (26.1% vs 41.3%; p = 0.024). Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for clinical remission in P2, with USTTL cutoff value of 6.34 µg/mL for clinical remission and a high rate of intensified patients (98%). Conclusion: High serum levels of UST were associated with clinical remission during treatment for IBD under intensification treatment, with a cutoff point of 6.3 µg/mL.

Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared the efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) and anti-TNF agents [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab(ADA)] in moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of UST, IFX, and ADA while differentiating between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients, which is an underexplored aspect, particularly in Asia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multi-center study from 2012 to 2023, categorizing patients into bio-naïve and bio-experienced groups. We evaluated clinical remission rates after induction therapy and clinical outcomes, including CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation during maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Among the 214 bio-naïve CD patients, 60 received UST, 108 received IFX, and 46 received ADA. After 1:1 propensity score matching between UST and anti-TNF agents groups, 59 patients were analyzed in each group (45 in the IFX group and 14 in the ADA group). We found no significant differences in clinical remission rates (P = 0.071), CD-related hospitalization (P = 0.800), intestinal resection (P = 0.390), or drug discontinuation (P = 0.052) between the UST, IFX, and ADA groups in bio-naïve CD patients. In bio-experienced CD patients, with 35 in the UST group and 13 in the anti-TNF agents group, the UST group showed a lower risk of drug discontinuation (P = 0.004) than the anti-TNF agents group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that UST, IFX, and ADA are equally effective in bio-naïve CD patients, while in bio-experienced patients, mostly with previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, UST may offer superior drug durability.

Tofacitinib for Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Case Report.

Purpose: At present, we have entered the era of using biological agents and small molecule targeted drugs to treat diseases. Although there have been many reports of biological agents treating pityriasis rubra pilaris recently, the clinical application of the JAK inhibitors in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris has been rarely reported, and there is a lack of evidence on the safety and efficacy of these drugs. We explore the use of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with significant efficacy and no significant side effects, providing new ideas for the clinical treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. Methods: We cover a case of pityriasis rubra pilaris treated with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, which showed significant efficacy without any adverse effects. Results: This case report showed that the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib had significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris. We speculated that the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with the JAK inhibitors may be related to blocking the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, thereby blocking the high expression of cytokines IL-17, IL-12/IL-23, IL-23, TNF-α. Conclusion: The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib can become a new option for treating pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Renal Dysfunction in a Patient With Crohn's Disease During Ustekinumab Treatment: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ustekinumab is a first-line drug for Crohn's disease. However, little is known about its potential adverse effects on renal function. We present the case of a 42-year-old man with Crohn's disease who developed chronic renal dysfunction during ustekinumab treatment, which resolved after discontinuing ustekinumab. The findings underscore the importance of close monitoring of renal function in patients receiving ustekinumab, particularly those with preexisting kidney disease or risk factors for renal dysfunction.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess the relative efficacy at 52 weeks (Wk52) of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or who had a previous inadequate response or an intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR). METHODS: Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from the bimekizumab trials BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data on patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 1 trial (NCT01009086; 45 mg, N = 205; 90 mg; N = 204) and a subgroup of TNFi-IR patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 2 trial (NCT01077362; 45 mg, N = 60; 90 mg, N = 58), respectively. Patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of the ustekinumab trial patients. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Non-placebo-adjusted comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and ustekinumab outcomes for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria (non-responder imputation) were analyzed. RESULTS: In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 45 mg: 2.14 [1.35, 3.40]; 90 mg: 1.98 [1.24, 3.16]), ACR50 (45 mg: 2.74 [1.75, 4.29]; 90 mg: 2.29 [1.48, 3.55]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 3.33 [2.04, 5.46]; 90 mg: 3.05 [1.89, 4.91]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (45 mg: 4.17 [2.13, 8.16]; 90 mg: 4.19 [2.07, 8.49]), ACR50 (45 mg: 5.00 [2.26, 11.05]; 90 mg: 3.86 [1.70, 8.79]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 9.85 [2.79, 34.79]; 90 mg: 6.29 [1.98, 20.04]). CONCLUSIONS: Using MAIC, bimekizumab showed greater efficacy than ustekinumab in achieving all ACR responses in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT01009086, NCT01077362.

Comparison of real-world healthcare resource utilization among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. METHODS: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

Limited predictive value of the gut microbiome and metabolome for response to biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Emerging evidence suggests the gut microbiome's potential in predicting response to biologic treatments in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this prospective study, we aimed to predict treatment response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab, integrating clinical data, gut microbiome profiles based on metagenomic sequencing, and untargeted fecal metabolomics. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers and attempted to replicate microbiome-based signals from previous studies. We found that the predictive utility of the gut microbiome and fecal metabolites for treatment response was marginal compared to clinical features alone. Testing our identified microbial ratios in an external cohort reinforced the lack of predictive power of the microbiome. Additionally, we could not confirm previously published predictive signals observed in similar sized cohorts. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of external validation and larger sample sizes, to better understand the microbiome's impact on therapy outcomes in the setting of biologicals in IBD before potential clinical implementation.

Real-World Long-Term Persistence and Surgical Procedure-Free Period Among Bio-naïve Patients with Crohn's Disease and Fistula Initiated on Ustekinumab.

INTRODUCTION: Fistula is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Treatment with biologics has been associated with fistula healing. Long-term persistence is an important factor for a chronic inflammatory process such as fistula. This study described 24-month persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints among bio-naïve patients with CD and intestinal fistula who were initiated on ustekinumab. METHODS: Adults with CD and any enteric or perianal fistula initiated on ustekinumab (index date) between September 23, 2016, and March 2, 2022, were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database and followed up to 24 months. Persistence on ustekinumab (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days) and composite endpoints of being persistent while on monotherapy and persistent while corticosteroid free were also assessed. The date of surgery was defined as the date of first claim for any CD-related surgeries. Persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints were assessed from the index date until the earliest of discontinuation (event), immunomodulator or other biologic use (event), corticosteroid use (event), date of surgery (event), 24-month follow-up or data end (censoring) using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The sample included 445 patients (mean age: 42.8 years; 56.6% female). The most common type of fistula was anal fistula (36.0%). At 24 months after ustekinumab initiation, 64.2% of patients remained persistent (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.8-71.4). Furthermore, 53.3% of patients were persistent while on monotherapy (95% CI 45.1-60.7), and 45.6% of patients were persistent while being corticosteroid free (95% CI 36.9-53.8). At 24 months, 22.8% (95% CI 17.0-30.3) of patients underwent any CD-related surgery. CONCLUSION: This study quantified long-term persistence on ustekinumab among bio-naïve patients with CD and fistula. Over half of patients initiated on ustekinumab were persistent and persistent while on monotherapy 24 months after initiation. Time-to-surgery estimate was comparable to existing evidence. These findings support ustekinumab as a treatment option for long-term management of CD with fistula.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Vedolizumab, Ustekinumab, and Tofacitinib After Induction and Maintenance for Ulcerative Colitis: Three Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited. METHODS: Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators. CONCLUSION: In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.