Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 145
Filtrar
1.
Gerokomos (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 33(3): 192-197, sept. 2022. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-219841

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Analizar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de personas con lesiones por presión y determinar cómo se ve afectada su dimensión física. Metodología: Se ha llevado a cabo una revisión sistemática mediante diferentes cadenas de búsqueda y bases de datos (CINAHL, Cuiden, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus y LILACS), incluyéndose estudios cuantitativos, cualitativos y revisiones sistemáticas sobre la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y cómo afectan las lesiones por presión a la dimensión física de las personas; previamente se analizó la calidad metodológica de los estudios mediante la herramienta Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASPe). Resultados: En la revisión se han incluido un total de 19 estudios, de los cuales 10 son cuantitativos, 7 cualitativos y los 2 restantes revisiones sistemáticas. De ellos, 8 analizan la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en personas con lesiones por presión y 18 la repercusión de dichas lesiones sobre la dimensión física. Los resultados de los estudios muestran que las personas con lesiones por presión tienen una peor calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y puntuaciones más bajas sobre la dimensión física que las que no tienen estas lesiones, provocando diferentes problemas sobre esta dimensión como los trastornos del sueño o las restricciones físicas. Conclusiones: Las personas con lesiones por presión perciben una peor calidad de vida relacionada con la salud que las que no tienen estas lesiones, afectando de forma negativa a su dimensión física (AU)


Objective: To analyze health-related quality of life of people with pressure injuries and determine how their physical dimension is affected. Methodology: A systematic review was carried out using different search chains and databases (CINAHL, Cuiden, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus and LILACS), including quantitative, qualitative studies and systematic reviews on health-related quality of life and how pressure injuries affect the physical dimension of people, previously analyzing the methodological quality of the studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASPe) tool. Results: A total of 19 studies have been included in the review, of which 10 are quantitative, 7 qualitative and the remaining 2 systematic reviews. Of these, 8 analyze the health-related quality of life in people with pressure injuries and 18 the impact of these injuries on the physical dimension. Study results show that people with pressure injuries have worse health-related quality of life and lower scores in the physical dimension than those who do not have these injuries, causing different problems on this dimension such as sleep disorders or physical restrictions. Conclusions: People with pressure injuries perceive a worse health-related quality of life than those who do not have these injuries, negatively affecting their physical dimension (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Personas con Discapacidad
2.
J Wound Care ; 30(4): 304-310, 2021 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856908

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A pressure ulcer (PU) is an area of tissue trauma caused by continuous and prolonged pressure, often associated with hospitalised patients immobilised due to neurological problems, negatively affecting their quality of life, and burdening the public budget. The aim of this study was to report the follow-up, for 45 weeks, of three patients with neurological lesions due to trauma who subsequently developed PUs, and who were treated with a combination of photodynamic therapy (PDT), low level laser therapy (LLLT) and cellulose membrane (CM). METHOD: PDT was mediated by the photosensitiser curcumin on a 1.5% emulsion base. Blue LED light at 450 nm was delivered continuously for 12 minutes at an irradiance of 30mW/cm2 and total energy delivered to the tissue was 22J/cm2. LLLT was performed with 660 nm laser, punctuated and continuous, twice a week with parameters: spot size 0.04cm2, power of 40mW, 10 seconds per point, fluence of 10J/cm2 and irradiance of 1000mW/cm2. RESULTS: All PUs had a significant reduction (range: 95.2-100%) of their area after 45 weeks of follow-up and two PUs had complete healing at 20 weeks and 30 weeks. All of the PUs showed a reduction in contamination with the PDT treatments in different proportions. CONCLUSION: From the results obtained, we conclude that the combination of PDT, LLLT and CM is a promising treatment for PU healing.


Asunto(s)
Celulosa/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Fotoquimioterapia , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Calidad de Vida
3.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(2): 216-221, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715949

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Repositioning of patients with reduced or impaired mobility could lessen pressure ulcers (PU). Automated preventive devices can support nurses, but user acceptance must be determined with valid and reliable tools. This study measured user acceptance of an automatic lateral turning device, using a self-developed questionnaire. METHOD: The study included 194 nurses in leadership positions from 75 institutions. A two-page user acceptance questionnaire was designed and tested for internal validity (exploratory factor analysis; EFA) and reliability (Cronbach's-α). A linear regression analysis was used to test the model's theoretical framework. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 74.9%. The EFA revealed five exploratory factors ("pain/well-being", "PU prevention", "handling", "nurse support", and "obese patient support") from the two outcomes ("general satisfaction" and "can replace manual repositioning"). The adjusted r2 was 0.607 for "general satisfaction", with the maximum standardized ß for "PU prevention" (0.476), "pain/well-being" (ß = 0.197) and "handling" (ß = 0.145). The adjusted r2 for "can replace manual positioning" was 0.458. The ß for "nurse support" was 0.264, followed by "pain-wellbeing" (ß = 0.224) and "obese patient support" (ß = 0.218). CONCLUSION: The psychometric testing results were satisfactory. Overall user acceptance of the automatic lateral turning device was high. A positive evaluation of the system's functionality, regarding the prevention of PU, is essential for patient and staff satisfaction, as well as user recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Posicionamiento del Paciente/instrumentación , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Psicometría/normas , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios Transversales , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(2): 244-249, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631705

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the reliability, and validity of a questionnaire measuring concordance for performing pressure-relief for pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention in people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). METHODS: Phase I included item development, content and face validity testing. In phase II, the questionnaire was evaluated for preliminary acceptability, reliability and validity among 48 wheelchair users with SCI. RESULTS: Thirty-seven items were initially explored. Item and factor analysis resulted in a final 26-item questionnaire with four factors reflecting concordance, perceived benefits, perceived negative consequences, and personal practical barriers to performing pressure-relief activities. The internal consistency reliability for four domains were very good (Cronbach's α = 0.75-.89). Pearson correlation coefficient on a test-retest of the same subjects yielded significant correlations in concordance (r2 = 0.91, p = .005), perceived benefit (r2 = 0.71, p < .04), perceived negative consequences (r2 = 0.98, p < .0001), personal barriers (r2 = 0.93, p= .002). Participants with higher levels of concordance reported a greater amount of pressure-relieving performed. Individuals viewing PrU as a threatening illness were associated with higher scores of concordance and tended to report a greater amount of pressure-relieving performance which provides evidence of criterion related validity. CONCLUSION: The new questionnaire demonstrated good preliminary reliability and validity in people with SCI. Further evaluation is necessary to confirm these findings using larger samples with follow-up data for predictive validity. Such a questionnaire could be used by clinicians to identify high risk of patients and to design individualised education programme for PrU prevention.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Psicometría/normas , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Nurs Open ; 8(1): 147-155, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33318822

RESUMEN

Aim: To investigate the psychological status of medical staff with medical device-related nasal and facial pressure ulcers (MDR PUs) during the outbreak of COVID-19, analyse the correlation between their psychological status and personality traits, so as to provide a reference for personalized psychological support. Design: A total of 207 medical staff who were treating the COVID-19 epidemic from Hunan and Hubei provinces were enrolled in this analytic questionnaire-based study. Methods: We used these measures: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale (EPQ-RSC), Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS), Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and demographic information forms online. Results: Medical staff wearing protective equipment are particularly susceptible to nasal and facial MDR PUs, which is increasing their social appearance anxiety; neuroticism is significantly related to social appearance anxiety and negative emotion. We should pay more attention to their psychological state, cultivate good personality characteristics and reduce negative emotions, and thereby alleviate their MDR PUs-related appearance anxiety.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Traumatismos Faciales/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Equipo de Protección Personal/efectos adversos , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Adulto , Imagen Corporal/psicología , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Traumatismos Faciales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Pruebas de Personalidad , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(1): 116-120, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33187791

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcer development is a known indicator of the quality of care. Negative attitudes towards the prevention of pressure ulcers can lead to preventive care with suboptimal quality. There is no valid and reliable instrument in Iran to assess clinicians' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention; therefore, this study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP) in Nurses. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 250 nurses were selected using a convenience sampling method. Face, content, and construct validity were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency was assessed using the McDonald's omega (ω), and reliability was assessed using the test-retest method. RESULTS: In the EFA, five factors of Competence, Responsibility, Perceived Consequences of Pressure Ulcers on Patients, Priority, and Confidence in the Effectiveness of Prevention were extracted that together explained 50.26% of the total variance. A McDonald's ω of 0.891 demonstrated the internal consistency of the total scale, and internal consistencies ranging from 0.70 to 0.86 were found for different dimensions of the instrument. In addition, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.876 was found that indicated the reliability (stability) of the total scale (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.736-0.963). CONCLUSION: The Persian version of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP) has good validity and reliability in Iranian nurses and can be used in future clinical studies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Psicometría/normas , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducción
8.
J Tissue Viability ; 29(4): 331-336, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32819802

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer is a significant healthcare problem throughout the world. Nurse educators should take the responsibility for students' improving knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding prevention of Pressure ulcer and allocate sufficient time to teach them by using various teaching methods. In this study we evaluate effects of education about prevention of pressure ulcer on knowledge and attitudes of nursing students. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group and a posttest. The study population comprised of 96 second-year nursing students at a university in Middle Anatolia Region of Turkey. The study sample included 84 second year nursing students, of whom 42 were assigned into an intervention group and 42 were assigned into a control group. The intervention group was offered education for two hours weekly for four weeks. Data collection between April and May in 2019. The statistics program SPSS 22 packaged software was used in the analyses of data. RESULTS: There was not a significant difference in sociodemographic features between the intervention and control groups. The groups significantly differed in their total scores for attitudes to prevention of pressure ulcer (p < 0.05). The intervention group got a significantly higher mean score for knowledge about prevention of pressure ulcer (63.00 ± 16.71) than the control group (39.35 ± 9.77) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The control group had lower scores for knowledge and attitudes about prevention, evaluation and management of pressure ulcer. Educators should revise the content of the national nursing curriculum about pressure ulcer and update their learning material and lectures in accordance with national and international guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Estudiantes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía
9.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 47(3): 236-241, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32384527

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if improved communication between certified wound care nurses and home health nurses, through use of standardized electronic wound care order sets and discharge instructions, decreased delay in treatment and 30-day readmission rates and improved wound healing for patients discharged to home with pressure injuries. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, nonequivalent group trial. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Cognitively intact adult patients hospitalized in the Midwestern United States with a stage 2 or higher pressure injury discharged to home care services. METHODS: We revised the electronic medical record to include an adapted, standardized version of the Project Re-Engineered Discharge wound care order set that included specific wound care instructions for use following discharge to home care. Medical records of 12 patients were reviewed prior to the change and 9 records were reviewed postchange for information about initiation of care, wound healing, and 30-day readmission. The Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing tool was used to evaluate wound healing. RESULTS: Time to initiation of treatment was 2.4 days for the control group and 1.6 days for the intervention group. Missing documentation made it difficult to evaluate the control group, as 73% of all wound measurements were missing from the electronic medical record. Use of the standardized wound care order set resulted in 100% of wound care orders and 92% of discharge instructions being present in the intervention group's electronic medical record at the time of hospital discharge. There was no statistically significant difference between control and intervention group's Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing scores for any postdischarge measurement or in 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: The new standardized wound care order sets at the time of discharge did increase adherence to time to implementation and documentation of executing wound care orders by home care nurses. Further research of standardized order sets is needed to determine the impact on improving patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Alta del Paciente/normas , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Estándares de Referencia , Adulto , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Readmisión del Paciente , Úlcera por Presión/psicología
10.
BMJ Open ; 10(3): e032332, 2020 03 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32217558

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) for chronic wounds are specific to a single wound type (eg, pressure ulcer) or part of the body. A barrier to outcome assessment in wound care and research is the lack of a rigorously designed PROM that can be used across wound types and locations. This mixed method study describes the protocol for an international collaboration to develop and validate a new PROM called the WOUND-Q for adults with chronic wounds. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In phase I, the qualitative approach of interpretive description is used to elicit concepts important to people with wounds regarding outcome. Participants from Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the USA are aged 18 years and older and have a wound that has lasted 3 months or longer. Interviews are digitally recorded, transcribed and coded. A conceptual framework and preliminary item pool are developed from the qualitative dataset. Draft scales are formed to cover important themes in the conceptual framework. These scales are refined using feedback from people with chronic wounds and wound care experts. After refinement, the scales are translated into Danish and Dutch, following rigorous methods, to prepare for an international field-test study. In phase II, data are collected in Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the USA. An international sample of people with a large variety of chronic wounds complete the WOUND-Q. Rasch Measurement Theory analysis is used to identify the best subset of items to retain for each scale and to examine reliability and validity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is coordinated at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, USA). Ethics board approval was received at each participating site for both study phases. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences and meetings.


Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Úlcera por Presión , Heridas y Lesiones , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
11.
J Tissue Viability ; 29(3): 176-179, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974010

RESUMEN

AIM OF THE STUDY: To explore patient understanding of why they develop a venous leg ulcer and how they can prevent recurrence. METHOD: The methodological framework of the hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seventeen participants living with a venous leg ulcer from May 2017 to November 2018. Data were analysed using Smith's interpretative hermeneutic analysis. RESULTS: The results are categorised into three main themes: "Trauma due to accident" (initial venous leg ulcer) and "Prevention of ulcer recurrence" (compression); "Trauma due to compression therapy" (venous leg ulcer recurrence). The findings demonstrate active venous leg ulcers are often caused by acute incidents while carrying out an activity in people with underlying chronic venous insufficiency. After a complete healing, preventive measures, such a compression stockings are initiated by the patient or health care provider. Trauma due to adherence to compression stockings caused skin breakdown beneath compression that caused subsequent ulcer recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to understanding the lived experience of patients with venous leg ulcers who develop a venous leg ulcer and their understanding of how they can prevent recurrence. Patients with VLUs would benefit from early preventive strategies, such as such a compression stockings fitting and application, integrated into daily care plan of primary care and community settings.


Asunto(s)
Pierna/anomalías , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Recurrencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Pierna/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Investigación Cualitativa , Autocuidado/psicología , Autocuidado/normas , Suiza
12.
Int Wound J ; 17(2): 339-350, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31820563

RESUMEN

The Patient Knowledge of, and Attitude and Behaviour towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument (KPUP) was developed and validated using a two-stage prospective psychometric instrument validation study design. In Stage 1, the instrument was designed, and it is psychometrically evaluated in Stage 2. To establish content validity, two expert panels independently reviewed each item for appropriateness and relevance. Psychometric evaluation included construct validity and stability testing of the instrument. The questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of 200 people aged more than 65 years, living independently in the community; reliability and stability were assessed by test/retest procedures, with a 1-week interval. Mean knowledge scores at 'test' were 11.54/20 (95% CI = 11.10-11.99, SD: 3.07), and 'retest' was 12.24 (95% CI = 11.81-12.66, SD: 2.93). For knowledge, correlation between the test/retest score was positive (r=. 60), attitude section-inter-item correlations ranged from r = -.31 to r = .57 (mean intraclass correlation coefficient of r = .42), and internal consistency for the retest was the same as the test (α = .41 for the eight items). For health behaviours, individual inter-item correlations for test items ranged from r = -.21 to r = .41 for the 13 standardised items. Psychometric testing of the KPUP in a sample of older persons in the community provided moderate internal consistency and general high test-retest stability.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Conducta , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Psicometría/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
J Wound Care ; 28(12): 795-806, 2019 Dec 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise and synthesise existing research literature pertaining to nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer (PU) prevention. METHOD: Using systematic review methodology, published quantitative studies focusing on nurses' attitudes towards PU prevention measured by psychometric tests were included. The search was conducted in May 2019 using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE databases, and returned 442 records, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool and all included studies were quality appraised using the checklist. RESULTS: Of the included studies, 20 employed a cross-sectional design and one author employed a validation study. In measuring nurses' attitudes toward PU prevention two distinct instruments were used: the 'Moore and Price Attitude Scale' and the 'Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument'. The mean attitude score within the studies was 73% (standard deviation=9.2%). The lowest attitude score was 51%, while the highest score was 89%. The results obtained from the studies indicated that 86% (n=18) yielded positive attitude results. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that, overall, nurses are positively disposed towards PU prevention. However, it is important to highlight that the nurses have difficulties translating this positive attitude into actual PU prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/enfermería , Úlcera por Presión/psicología
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31700681

RESUMEN

Study design: A quantitative, descriptive study using a cross-sectional survey. Objectives: To describe the pressure ulcer knowledge, beliefs and practices amongst persons with SCI, who received rehabilitation at a Cape Town rehabilitation centre. Setting: A rehabilitation centre for clients with physical disabilities in Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: A quantitative, descriptive study, that employed consecutive sampling, was done. Participants included inpatients (n = 30), outpatients (n = 33) and peer supporters (n = 8). Data were collected during April and March 2015 with a questionnaire developed through collating existing questionnaires and adapting it for the study context. This rendered a knowledge score and data on beliefs and practices. The Fisher's exact test was used for comparative analysis (p < 0.05). Results: The mean combined knowledge score was 42.7%. The majority of participants (88.7%) believed pressure ulcers to be serious and 45% thought they were likely to develop a PU. They believed daily skin checks (80.3%), weight shifting (86%) and limiting sitting time (80.3%) could prevent PU development. Study participants indicated that they did not regularly follow guideline recommended practices like regular pressure relief (51%) (36 participants) or daily skin inspection (38%) (27 participants) and 37% (26 participants) reported being current smokers. Conclusion: Participants showed a lack of knowledge, which might have affected their pressure ulcer prevention practices negatively. The study findings can be used to assist with the development of a contextually relevant training programme on pressure care.


Asunto(s)
Cultura , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Centros de Rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
J Tissue Viability ; 28(4): 167-172, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288977

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is currently a low level of evidence for the impact of patient education on the management of patients with chronic neurological disease at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a patient education programme on pressure ulcer prevention in patients with chronic spinal cord injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included adult patients with any spinal cord injury, regardless of the cause. Participants attended 2 group workshops focusing on pressure ulcer prevention. Various clinical data were gathered during an initial individual interview and at 3, 6 and 12 months, along with rating scale values from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Rosenberg self-esteem scale, Schwarzer self-efficacy scale, a quality of life scale (SF-36) and the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (Revised SMnac), which was used as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in the study. The mean patient age was 52 years (SD: 9,8). Sixteen patients had traumatic spinal cord injuries, with a median injury duration of 234 months (IQR: 123-407). Seventy-five percent had had a pressure ulcer in the twelve months prior to the study. Patient education was shown to have a significant impact on skin management ability, with a highly significant increase in the overall revised SMnac score at 3 months. These results were stable over time, from 6 to 12 months. Six patients developed a pressure ulcer during the study (30%). CONCLUSION: This study supports the hypothesis that a therapeutic educational program conducted at the chronic phase in spinal cord injured individuals has an impact.


Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Educación/métodos , Educación/normas , Educación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Cuidados de la Piel/normas , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología
17.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil ; 25(1): 31-40, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30774288

RESUMEN

Background: Pressure injuries negatively impact quality of life and participation for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Objective: To examine the factors that may protect against the development of medically serious pressure injuries in adults with SCI. Methods: A qualitative analysis was conducted using treatment notes regarding 50 socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals who did not develop medically serious pressure injuries during a 12-month pressure injury prevention intervention program. Results: Eight types of potentially protective factors were identified: meaningful activity, motivation to prevent negative health outcomes, stability/resources, equipment, communication and self-advocacy skills, personal traits, physical factors, and behaviors/activities. Conclusions: Some protective factors (eg, personal traits) may be inherent to certain individuals and nonmodifiable. However, future interventions for this population may benefit from a focus on acquisition of medical equipment and facilitation of sustainable, health-promoting habits and routines. Substantive policy changes may be necessary to facilitate access to adequate resources, particularly housing and equipment, for socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals with SCI. Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay of risk and protective factors for pressure injuries in adults with SCI, particularly in underserved groups.


Asunto(s)
Área sin Atención Médica , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Cuidadores , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Motivación , Terapia Ocupacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Defensa del Paciente , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Método Simple Ciego , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología
18.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 81(4): 881-890, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664905

RESUMEN

Though preventable in most cases, pressure ulcers continue to pose a major burden to the individual and society, affecting ≤3 million adults annually in the United States alone. Despite increased national attention over the past 20 years, the prevalence of pressure ulcers has largely remained unchanged, while the associated costs of care continue to increase. Dermatologists can play a significant role in pressure ulcer prevention by becoming aware of at-risk populations and implementing suitable preventive strategies. Moreover, dermatologists should be able to recognize early changes that occur before skin breakdown and to properly identify and stage pressure ulcers to prevent delay of appropriate care. The aim of the first article in this continuing medical education series is to discuss the pathophysiology, risk factors, epidemiology, social and economic burdens, and clinical presentation of pressure ulcers.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera por Presión/diagnóstico , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Trials ; 20(1): 77, 2019 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30678710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are prone to pressure ulcers (PUs) because of the loss of sensorimotor function involved as well as increased skin moisture. Treatment of PU after SCI is complicated, involving different specialties and with need for long-lasting follow-up. This study should identify risk factors for PU after SCI, and find an effective and less time-consuming treatment for the condition among different available methods for follow-up. METHOD/DESIGN: The first part of this research project aims to investigate the prevalence of PU among persons with SCI based on an epidemiological design. The study will identify possible risk factors for acquiring PU. A questionnaire focusing on previous and present PUs will be sent to persons who suffered SCIs between January 2004 and January 2014. In the second part we will compare two different treatment regimens of PU through a randomized controlled pilot trial (RCT) where we will compare outpatient SCI follow-up in a hospital versus outpatient follow-up from the patient's home, using telemedicine (teleSCI) interventions. We will compare the healing of the PU in the two groups (usual care versus teleSCI). The Tissue, Infection, Moisture Edge (TIME) registration form, the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT) and the change in the ulcer size will be used to monitor the healing. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the need for assistance will be assessed using the Five Dimensions European Quality of Life scale (EQ-5D), the generic Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) modified version, the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Data set (ISCI-QoL Data set), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure scale, version III (SCIM III). In addition to primary outcome measures, a cost-benefit evaluation and an assessment of patient satisfaction and participation will be performed, using customized questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The first part of the research project will reveal the epidemiology of PU after SCI, and explore the risk factors. This part enables further prevention of PU after SCI and this information will be used in the follow-up RCT. Videoconferencing in the outpatient follow-up of persons with SCI and PU will change clinical routines and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, communication and competence exchange among participants of the health care services. Our research protocol allows comparing methods for interaction between medical specialists at hospitals, local caregivers in the community, next of kin, and persons with SCI and PU. The RCT should identify advantages as well as challenges in the management of PU in different follow-up settings. This study aims to identify risk factors for PU after SCI, and find an effective and less time consuming treatment for the condition among different available methods for follow- up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 1. www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT02800915 , last update 9 October 2017. 2. The National Regional Ethical Committee (REC) 2014/ 684/ REK-Nord. https://helseforskning.etikkom.no/prosjekterirek/prosjektregister/prosjekt?p_document_id=469163&p_parent_id=473640&_ikbLanguageCode=n 3. https://app.cristin.no/projects/show.jsf?id=545284 4. https://www.sunnaas.no/kliniske-studier/bruk-av-telemedisin-som-virkemiddel-til-samhandling-i-poliklinisk-oppfolging-av-pasienter-med-ryggmargsskade-og-trykksar.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Telemedicina , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Cicatrización de Heridas
20.
J Nurs Manag ; 27(1): 117-124, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221444

RESUMEN

AIM: To study the relationship between pressure ulcer risk evaluated by the Norton Scale and inadequate fulfilment of Need 2 (Eating/Drinking) from the 14-need classification designed by Virginia Henderson. BACKGROUND: Assessing nutritional status and skin condition to implement preventive measures are important nursing interventions. Our hospital's standard procedure requires recording Norton Scale and Henderson Eating/Drinking Assessment results. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, analysing case histories of 219 patients in medical/surgical wards for >24 hr with nursing care recorded in the GACELA Care computer application. Patient sociodemographic variables and evaluation concepts from the Norton Scale and Eating/Drinking were studied. RESULTS: A statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05; 95% CI: 0.61, 2.83) was seen between inadequate Eating/Drinking need fulfilment and increased pressure ulcer risk. Pressure ulcer risk was generally low in the sample, with mainly no or minimum risk (77.3%); the oldest age group had the highest risk. Self-care autonomy was the most frequently assessed item in Eating/Drinking (42%). CONCLUSIONS: A relationship was found between Norton Scale risk results and Eating/Drinking need assessment results. The greater the pressure ulcer risk, the more likely was inadequate need satisfaction (poor nutritional status). IMPLICATIONS: To help identify pressure ulcer risk, nurses should assess patients' eating independence. Safeguarding nutritional status and preventing pressure ulcers are nursing skills associated with quality nursing care.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria/psicología , Úlcera por Presión/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Úlcera por Presión/psicología , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Autocuidado , España
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...