Acute or chronic use of lacosamide does not alter its distribution between serum and cerebrospinal fluid.

OBJECTIVE: The site of action for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is within the brain; however, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration is highly variable. Lacosamide (LCM) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults, and has linear pharmacokinetics in serum. Penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is unknown. This study aims to provide additional insights into the pharmacokinetics of LCM. METHODS: Thirty adults undergoing craniotomy for treatment of intractable epilepsy or brain tumor were recruited and were either taking LCM long term (group 1, n = 15), or were LCM naive, receiving LCM as prophylaxis for surgery (group 2, n = 15). All patients received one intravenous (IV) dose (15 min infusion) immediately prior to craniotomy. CSF and arterial blood were collected simultaneously following craniotomy. LCM concentrations were measured in serum and CSF. RESULTS: LCM concentration differences between groups 1 and 2 for both CSF and serum were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.0005), but there was no statistically significant difference in CSF/serum ratios (group 1 = 0.726 ± 0.231; group 2 = 0.556 ±0.241; p = 0.0585). LCM concentration in serum correlated positively with CSF concentration in group 1 (Pearson r = 0.8527, p < 0.0001). The time interval between the end of dose delivery and sample collection correlated positively with the CSF/serum ratio for the drug-naive group (Pearson r = 0.6525; p = 0.0084). Treatment with other AEDs did not affect LCM distribution between serum and CSF. SIGNIFICANCE: Although chronic dosing resulted in higher LCM concentrations in serum and CSF compared to drug-naive patients, the CSF/serum ratio was not affected by LCM pretreatment. These data suggest that LCM serum concentration may reliably predict CSF concentration.

Comparison of lacosamide concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to estimate the exposure of the central nervous system (CNS) to the antiepileptic drug (AED) lacosamide, under steady state conditions, in patients with epilepsy who take oral lacosamide alongside up to three other AEDs. METHODS: Twenty-seven serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 21 patients receiving lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy (50-600 mg/day over two or three doses). This included 23 time-matched pairs of serum and CSF samples from 19 patients. The concentration of lacosamide in each sample was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Linear regression was used to characterize the relationship between the CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentration and the time since dosing, the daily lacosamide dose, or the daily dose normalized by volume of distribution (Vd , approximated to total body water), and between the drug concentrations in each compartment (CSF vs. serum). RESULTS: Concentrations of lacosamide in CSF (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 7.37 ± 3.73 µg/ml, range 1.24-14.95, n = 27) and serum (mean ± SD 8.16 ± 3.82 µg/ml, range 2.29-15.45, n = 27) samples showed a good correlation over the dose range investigated. The mean CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentrations was 0.897 ± 0.193 (range 0.492-1.254, n = 23 time-matched pairs) and was independent of lacosamide dose. SIGNIFICANCE: Drug concentrations in the CSF are often used to indicate those in the brain interstitial fluid. In patients with epilepsy who follow a stable oral AED dosing regimen, lacosamide concentration in CSF is approximately 85% of that found in serum, suggesting that serum may be a valuable indicator of lacosamide concentration in the CNS.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical critically ill patients with proven or suspected central nervous system infections.

Linezolid is a valuable treatment option for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive micro-organisms. Data regarding its penetration into the CNS have shown wide variability. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in critically ill patients with external CSF drainage and proven or suspected CNS infections. This was an observational pharmacokinetic (PK) study in 11 critically ill patients with proven or suspected CNS infection receiving linezolid. Serial blood and CSF samples were taken and were subject to population PK analysis. The median (interquartile range) of AUC(0-12h) was 47.6 (17.9-58.6) mgh/L in plasma and 21.1 (18.8-30.4) mgh/L in CSF, with a median CSF/plasma ratio of 0.77. At pre-dose at steady state, a strong positive correlation was observed between linezolid concentrations in CSF and plasma (Spearman's rho=0.758; P=0.011). For a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L, the median AUC(0-24h)/MIC values in plasma and CSF were <80 in all patients. A three-compartment linear model was found to be most appropriate. The mean value for linezolid clearance was 16.6L/h and mean volume of distribution was 101.3 L. No covariate relationships could be supported on any of the parameters. Linezolid demonstrated good penetration into the CNS but high interindividual PK variability. Administration of higher than standard doses of linezolid and therapeutic drug monitoring should therefore be considered as options to optimise linezolid dosing in critically ill patients with CNS infections.

Linezolid penetration into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the penetration of linezolid into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue after a single i.v. dose of 600 mg. The penetration of linezolid into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue was studied in 18 patients undergoing a neurosurgical procedure. Linezolid 600 mg i.v. was given with the induction of anesthesia. Mean concentrations of linezolid 2h after the final dose, in serum, cerbrospinal fluid and brain tissue were assayed by HPLC. CSF/serum and brain/serum ratios were 69.57% and 44.66% respectively. Concentrations of linezolid were above the MIC(90s )for staphylococci and streptococci. The concentrations obtained indicate good penetration of linezolid into CSF and brain tissue and support its use in the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive CNS infections.

[Measuring linezolid in biological fluids using high-efficiency liquid chromatography]. / Determinación de linezolid en fluidos biológicos mediante cromatografía líquida de alta eficacia.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an analytic method for determining linezolid concentrations in biological fluids including plasma, vitreous humour and cerebrospinal fluid using high-efficiency liquid chromatography and subsequent ultraviolet detection. METHOD: The method was validated by studying the following parameters: accuracy, precision, sensitivity, linearity and recovery. The drug was extracted from the biological matrix by means of a protein precipitation with perchloric acid. Chromatographic separation was performed by eluting linezolid with a mobile phase consisting of 80% K2HPO4 buffer solution (15 mM; pH=5) and 20% acetonitrile, and a stationary phase, NOVAPAK C18 150x3.9 mm with precolumn. The wavelength reading was 254 nm and the working flow rate was 1 ml/min. RESULTS: We obtained values with accuracies between 94.4 and 106.1%, and precisions between 0.88-6% and 3.7-5.6% for intra-and inter-day variability, respectively. Recovery obtained after analysing the plasma samples was at 93%. The method showed itself to be linear for the concentration levels under study. DISCUSSION: The method's behaviour can be described as linear, precise and accurate. Furthermore, the method is fast, sensitive, and inexpensive. It is useful for determining linezolid concentrations in multiple biological matrices. It can also be used as a basis for further clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Linezolid cerebrospinal fluid concentration in central nervous system infection.

We report two cases of central nervous system infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis treated with linezolid. The first case was a 72-year old woman with ventriculitis in the presence of intraventricular catheter: therapeutic effectiveness was documented clinically and microbiologically; serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels were measured after the first and fourth doses: trough linezolid concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid were 1.44 and 2.9 mg/L respectively, higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The second case was a 27-year old man with post-traumatic cerebral abscess; during 5 days linezolid was not found in his cerebrospinal fluid despite very high serum level peak, and the drug was not detectable in cerebral tissue surgically removed after 14 days of therapy. Linezolid may not reach therapeutic concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid, and, when possible, we suggest that drug levels be monitored.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma in neurointensive care patients with staphylococcal ventriculitis associated with external ventricular drains.

The pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in five neurointensive care patients with staphylococcal ventriculitis was studied. The mean area under concentration-time curve (+/- standard deviation) was 63 +/- 18.9 mg x h/liter, with a CSF-to-plasma ratio of 0.8 +/- 0.3. Times above MIC in CSF were 99.8% and 57.2% for pathogens with MICs of 2 mg/liter and 4 mg/liter, respectively.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical patients.

Linezolid is a new antimicrobial agent effective against drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens commonly responsible for central nervous system (CNS) infections in neurosurgical patients hospitalized in intensive care units. In order to study the penetration of this antimicrobial into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of such patients, the disposition of linezolid in serum and CSF was studied in 14 neurosurgical patients given linezolid at 600 mg twice daily (1-h intravenous infusion) for the treatment of CNS infections caused by gram-positive pathogens or for prophylactic chemotherapy. Serum and CSF linezolid steady-state concentrations were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and the concentration-time profiles obtained were analyzed to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) linezolid maximum and minimum measured concentrations were 18.6 +/- 9.6 microg/ml and 5.6 +/- 5.0 microg/ml, respectively, in serum and 10.8 +/- 5.7 microg/ml and 6.1 +/- 4.2 microg/ml, respectively, in CSF. The mean +/- SD areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) were 128.7 +/- 83.9 microg x h/ml for serum and 101.6 +/- 59.6 microg x h/ml for CSF, with a mean penetration ratio for the AUC for CSF to the AUC for serum of 0.66. The mean elimination half-life of linezolid in CSF was longer than that in serum (19.1 +/- 19.0 h and 6.5 +/- 3.6 h, respectively). The serum and CSF linezolid concentrations exceeded the pharmacodynamic breakpoint of 4 microg/ml for susceptible target pathogens for the entire dosing interval in the majority of patients. These findings suggest that linezolid may achieve adequate concentrations in the CSF of patients requiring antibiotics for the management or prophylaxis of CNS infections caused by gram-positive pathogens.

Successful treatment and cerebrospinal fluid penetration of oral linezolid in a patient with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ventriculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ventriculitis successfully treated with oral linezolid, for which good cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration was observed. CASE SUMMARY: A 69-year-old man had an extraventricular drain inserted following a right cerebellar infarct. On day 6, the CSF culture was positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci; intravenous vancomycin 1 g daily was initiated to treat ventriculitis. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt, inserted on day 35 to manage communicating hydrocephalus, was subsequently removed as symptoms suggesting infection presented. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was isolated from shunt reservoir aspirate, and intrathecal vancomycin 10 mg daily was added to the treatment regimen. On day 61, vancomycin was stopped and oral linezolid 600 mg twice daily was started. Linezolid was discontinued 22 days later, with no evidence of ongoing infection. Four blood samples were collected around the seventh dose of linezolid and 5 CSF samples were collected on separate days during treatment. Linezolid concentrations were measured in plasma and CSF by HPLC. Using an ADAPT II maximum a priori Bayesian estimator module, a 2 compartment pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the plasma linezolid concentration data and CSF:predicted plasma concentration ratios (ranging from 0.27 to 1.02) were derived. All CSF concentrations exceeded the reported 90% minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L for linezolid against coagulase-negative staphylococci. DISCUSSION: Evidence of the effectiveness of linezolid against central nervous system infections is growing; however, limited data exist describing its CSF penetration. Oral linezolid exhibited good CSF penetration in this patient, which corresponded to positive clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Oral linezolid may play a valuable role in the treatment of multiresistant gram-positive central nervous system infections.

Antiepileptic drug pharmacokinetics and neuropharmacokinetics in individual rats by repetitive withdrawal of blood and cerebrospinal fluid: milacemide.

1. The kinetics and metabolism of milacemide have been studied in an animal model which allows the simultaneous investigation of the temporal inter-relationships of drugs and metabolites in blood (pharmacokinetics) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, neuropharmacokinetics) in individual freely moving rats. 2. Milacemide dose-dependently increased CSF glycine and glycinamide (intermediary metabolite) concentrations. This confirms that milacemide is a CNS glycine prodrug. 3. Pretreatment with L-deprenyl (2 mg kg-1), a specific inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B), almost completely prevented the formation of glycinamide and increased milacemide accumulation in CSF. Tmax and t1/2 were significantly increased and Cmax and AUC values were decreased for glycinamide compared to controls. Pretreatment with clorgyline (5 mg kg-1), a specific inhibitor of MAO-type A, only moderately decreased glycinamide Cmax and AUC values. 4. After milacemide administration (100, 200 and 400 mg kg-1, i.p.) serum and CSF milacemide concentrations rose linearly and dose-dependently. Serum glycinamide concentrations exhibited small dose-dependent rises but these were not linearly related. In contrast, CSF glycinamide concentrations rose linearly and dose-dependently with Cmax values 2.5, 3.2 and 4.1 times greater than the corresponding values for serum glycinamide after giving 100, 200 and 400 mg kg-1 respectively of milacemide. 5. Serum glycine concentrations were unaffected but CSF concentrations increased dose-dependently and these were significant at the higher milacemide doses (200 and 400 mg kg-1). Animals given 400 mg kg-1 milacemide had glycine values which were still significantly elevated 7 h later. 6. In conclusion, serum milacemide rapidly enters and equilibrates with the CNS compartment where it is metabolised primarily by MAO-B to glycinamide and finally to glycine. Metabolism in the peripheral compartment is negligible.

Simple and rapid micro-analytical procedures for the estimation of milacemide and its metabolite glycinamide in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic technique is described for the determination of milacemide and its primary metabolite glycinamide in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Milacemide and glycinamide are derivatized with fluorescamine to form a chromophore and a fluorophore and subsequent analysis using ultraviolet and fluorescence detectors, respectively. The extraction procedures are simple with a limit of detection 2 and 0.5 micrograms/ml for milacemide in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, and 0.5 micrograms/ml for glycinamide in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid. The within-batch coefficients of variation for both analytes were less than 3%. Since only a small amount of sample is required, these techniques are well suited for the study of milacemide pharmacokinetics in the rat.