Anti-adalimumab antibodies kinetics: an early guide for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) switching.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the longitudinal production of anti-adalimumab antibody (AAA) and baseline risk factors for this antibody development in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients initiating adalimumab (ADA). METHOD: Thirty consecutive JIA patients under ADA therapy were prospectively followed. JIA clinical/laboratorial/treatment data and sera for ADA and AAA assays (ELISA and bridging ELISA) were obtained at baseline (BL), 2 months (2M), 3 months (3M), 6 months (6M), 12 months (12M), and 24 months (24M). Patients with therapy failure requiring ADA withdrawn had their sera evaluated at their last medical visit prior to biologic switch (blinded to ADA and AAA levels). RESULTS: AAA was absent at BL, first detected at 2M after ADA initiation in 2/30 (7%) patients with a significant increase at 3M (10/29 (34%), p = 0.013) and no major change in 6M (11/30 (37%)) and 12M (9/26 (35%)). Of note, at 3M, AAA levels correlated negatively with ADA levels (r = - 0.781, p = 0.0001). Analysis of BL predictors revealed a significantly higher risk of developing AAA in patients with female gender (OR 21; 95% CI 1.08-406.57; p = 0.044), ESR > 30 mm/1st hour (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.04-28.53; p = 0.045), and leflunomide use (OR 9.33; 95% CI 1.51-57.66; p = 0.016). In contrast, concomitant use of methotrexate was protective for AAA appearance (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.53; p = 0.009). After 12M of ADA, 60% of AAA-positive patients required drug switch for drug failure compared with 15% in AAA-negative group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel evidence of AAA production kinetics demonstrating a timely significant increase starting at 3M and stable throughout 24M. We also identified female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use as relevant risk factors for AAA production at BL, whereas methotrexate was protective. Early systematic monitoring of AAA at 3M may, therefore, guide drug switching in these patients.Key Points• Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) production kinetics demonstrated a timely significant increase starting at 3M in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients under adalimumab therapy• Female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use were identified as relevant risk factors for AAA production in JIA, whereas methotrexate was protective.

A new CHO (Chinese hamster ovary)-derived cell line expressing anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody with biosimilar potential.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that mediates the homeostasis of immune responses; its exacerbated production is associated with the pathogenesis of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Anti-TNFα drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. Currently, a worldwide race is on stage for the production of biosimilars moved by patent expiration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as anti-TNFα adalimumab. Our goal was to develop the first stage of an adalimumab biosimilar candidate with potential for national production, through the generation of a productive and stable cell line and assess its functionality. The robotic system ClonePix was used for screening and isolation of colonies from transfected CHO-S stable pools plated in semisolid medium. Selected clones were expanded based on growth and productivity. Purified mAbs from different clones were tested for binding and functional activity. The binding affinity of the denominated adabut clones to TNFα and FcRγ did not differ statistically when compared to reference adalimumab. One functional activity assay demonstrated the antibody neutralization capacity of the cytotoxicity induced by TNFα in L929 murine fibroblasts. A second assay confirmed adabut as an antagonist of the TNFα activity by the inhibition of the cell adhesion molecule expression in HUVEC cultures. The binding and functional activity analyses performed with selected adabut clones in comparison to reference adalimumab represent an important status of "non-inferiority," part of the process required for a biosimilar development. We generated and selected high-quality adabut clones which mAbs may be further developed as the first in-house made Brazilian biosimilar, demonstrating a success case for our incipient biotechnology industry, or also modified as biobetters, thus representing an innovative strategy for the patients' welfare.

Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients From Argentina Treated With Adalimumab, Etanercept, or Infliximab in a Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents may induce immune responses that could impact drug action. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from Argentina treated with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab at a single visit and correlate it with efficacy outcomes. METHODS: In this subset analysis of a noninterventional, multinational, cross-sectional study (NCT01981473), adult patients with RA treated continuously for 6 to 24 months with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab were evaluated for ADAs and trough drug concentrations of 2 days or less prior to the next scheduled dose. Efficacy measurements included Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, low disease activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. Targeted medical history of injection site/infusion reactions, serum sickness, and thromboembolic events were reported. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and duration of treatment of the 119 patients (etanercept: n = 54, adalimumab: n = 52, infliximab: n = 13) were similar across all groups. No etanercept-treated patient tested positive for ADAs compared with 19 (36.5%) of 52 patients and 4 (30.8%) of 13 patients treated with adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. In adalimumab- and infliximab-treated patients, ADA presence correlated negatively with trough drug levels. A greater proportion of ADA-negative patients achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index of 0.5 or less and had better composite efficacy measures compared with ADA-positive patients. The rate of targeted medical events reported was low. CONCLUSIONS: In this subset analysis, RA patients from Argentina treated with adalimumab or infliximab, but not etanercept, tested positive for ADAs. Antidrug antibody-negative patients showed a tendency toward better clinical outcomes compared with ADA-positive patients.

Higher body mass index and anti-drug antibodies predict the discontinuation of anti-TNF agents in Korean patients with axial spondyloarthritis / O maior índice de massa corporal e a presença de anticorpos antifármacos predizem a interrupção no uso de agentes anti-TNF em pacientes sul-coreanos com espondiloartrite axial

ABSTRACT Objective: The development of anti-drug antibodies against tumor necrosis factor inhibitors is a likely explanation for the failure of TNF-inhibitors in patients with spondyloarthritis. Our study determined the existence and clinical implications of ADAbs in axial spondyloarthritis patients. Methods: According to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab were recruited consecutively. Serum samples were collected at enrollment to measure anti-drug antibodies and drug levels. Results: Of 100 patients, the mean duration of current TNF inhibitor use was 22.3 ± 17.9 months. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 5 of 72 adalimumab users compared to 5 of 28 infliximab users (6.9% vs. 17.9%). Anti-drug antibodies-positive patients had a significantly higher body mass index than anti-drug antibodies-negative patients among both adalimumab (28.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2 vs. 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.01) and infliximab users (25.9 ± 2.8 kg/m2 vs. 22.6 ± 2.8 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.02). During the median 15-month follow-up period, drug discontinuation occurred more frequently in the anti-drug antibodies-positive group than the anti-drug antibodies-negative group (30.0% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p = 0.04). In logistic regression, anti-drug antibodies positivity (OR = 5.85, 95% CI 1.19-28.61, p = 0.029) and body mass index (OR = 4.35, 95% CI 1.01-18.69, p = 0.048) were associated with a greater risk of stopping TNF inhibitor treatment. Conclusions: Our result suggests that the presence of anti-drug antibodies against adalimumab and infliximab as well as a higher body mass index can predict subsequent drug discontinuation in axial spondyloarthritis patients.

RESUMO Objetivo: O desenvolvimento de anticorpos antifármacos (ADAb) contra o fator de necrose tumoral (TNF) é uma explicação provável para a falha dos anti-TNF em pacientes com espondiloartrites (EspA). O presente estudo determinou a presença e as implicações clínicas dos ADAb em pacientes com EspA axiais. Métodos: De acordo com os critérios de classificação para EspA axial da Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society, recrutaram-se consecutivamente pacientes tratados com adalimumabe ou infliximabe. Coletaram-se amostras de soro no momento da entrada no estudo para medir os níveis de ADAb e de fármaco. Resultados: Dos 100 pacientes, a duração média de uso dos anti-TNF atuais foi de 22,3 ± 17,9 meses. Os ADAb foram detectados em cinco de 72 pacientes em uso de adalimumabe, em comparação com cinco de 28 usuários de infliximabe (6,9% vs. 17,9%). Os pacientes ADAb-positivos tinham um índice de massa corporal maior do que aqueles ADAb-negativos, tanto entre indivíduos em uso de adalimumabe (28,4 ± 5,9 kg/m2 vs. 24,3 ± 2,9 kg/m2, respectivamente, p = 0,01) quanto de infliximabe (25,9 ± 2,8 kg/m2 vs. 22,6 ± 2,8 kg/m2 respectivamente, p = 0,02). Durante o período médio de seguimento de 15 meses, a suspensão do fármaco ocorreu com maior frequência no grupo ADAb-positivo do que no grupo ADAb-negativo (30,0% vs. 6,5%, respectivamente, p = 0,04). Na regressão logística, a positividade no ADAb (OR = 5,85, IC 95% 1,19 a 28,61, p = 0,029) e o IMC (OR = 4,35, IC 95% 1,01 a 18,69, p = 0,048) esteve associada a um maior risco de interromper o tratamento com anti-TNF. Conclusões: Os resultados do presente estudo sugerem que a presença de ADAb contra o adalimumabe e o infliximabe, bem como um IMC mais alto, pode predizer a subsequente interrupção do fármaco em pacientes com EspA axial.

Higher body mass index and anti-drug antibodies predict the discontinuation of anti-TNF agents in Korean patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The development of anti-drug antibodies against tumor necrosis factor inhibitors is a likely explanation for the failure of TNF-inhibitors in patients with spondyloarthritis. Our study determined the existence and clinical implications of ADAbs in axial spondyloarthritis patients. METHODS: According to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab were recruited consecutively. Serum samples were collected at enrollment to measure anti-drug antibodies and drug levels. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, the mean duration of current TNF inhibitor use was 22.3±17.9 months. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 5 of 72 adalimumab users compared to 5 of 28 infliximab users (6.9% vs. 17.9%). Anti-drug antibodies-positive patients had a significantly higher body mass index than anti-drug antibodies-negative patients among both adalimumab (28.4±5.9kg/m2 vs. 24.3±2.9kg/m2, respectively, p=0.01) and infliximab users (25.9±2.8kg/m2 vs. 22.6±2.8kg/m2, respectively, p=0.02). During the median 15-month follow-up period, drug discontinuation occurred more frequently in the anti-drug antibodies-positive group than the anti-drug antibodies-negative group (30.0% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p=0.04). In logistic regression, anti-drug antibodies positivity (OR=5.85, 95% CI 1.19-28.61, p=0.029) and body mass index (OR=4.35, 95% CI 1.01-18.69, p=0.048) were associated with a greater risk of stopping TNF inhibitor treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our result suggests that the presence of anti-drug antibodies against adalimumab and infliximab as well as a higher body mass index can predict subsequent drug discontinuation in axial spondyloarthritis patients.

Determination of adalimumab and etanercept trough levels and drug antibodies in long-term psoriasis treatment: a single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: An algorithm based on measurement of a serum tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) and antidrug antibodies (ADA) has been proposed previously to guide dose escalation or therapy switching in the early (i.e. the first months of) treatment of psoriasis by anti-TNF. In long-term treatment of responding patients with psoriasis, it is usual to empirically reduce standard doses of anti-TNF to reduce exposure while maintaining clinical response. The relationship between serum anti-TNF, ADA levels and clinical efficacy in long-term treated patients with psoriasis has not yet been determined, so the potential role of these parameters in guiding dose escalation in this scenario is unknown. AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between drug/ADA levels and clinical efficacy in a group of patients with psoriasis undergoing long-term treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, cohort study of patients with psoriasis receiving adalimumab or etanercept for a minimum of 48 weeks. All patients were started on the standard dose, but some adalimumab users had a reduced frequency of administration. Clinical efficacy was measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. Serum concentrations were measured by ELISA. Clinical assessment and blood sample collection were carried out simultaneously within 24 h before the next drug administration. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients were enrolled (67 simultaneous clinical and serum determinations: 38 receiving adalimumab, 29 receiving etanercept). We did not find any association between serum anti-TNF levels and clinical response. None of the patients developed ADA. CONCLUSIONS: ADA and anti-TNF levels are not related to clinical effectiveness in patients with psoriasis undergoing long-term treatment with adalimumab or etanercept.

Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals.

Biopharmaceuticals have the potential to raise an immunogenic response in treated individuals, which may impact the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs. As a result, it is essential to evaluate immunogenicity throughout the different phases of the clinical development of a biopharmaceutical, including post-marketing surveillance. Although rigorous evaluation of biopharmaceutical immunogenicity is required by regulatory authorities, there is a lack of uniform standards for the type, quantity, and quality of evidence, and for guidance on experimental design for immunogenicity assays or criteria to compare immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Moreover, substantial technological advances in methods to assess immune responses have yielded higher immunogenicity rates with modern assays, and limit comparison of immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals outside of head-to-head clinical trials. Accordingly, research programs, regulatory agencies, and clinicians need to keep pace with continuously evolving analyses of immunogenicity. Here, we review factors associated with immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals, potential clinical ramifications, and current regulatory guidance for evaluating immunogenicity, and discuss methods to assess immunogenicity in non-clinical and clinical studies. We also describe special considerations for evaluating the immunogenicity of biosimilar candidates.