Assessment of swallowability and acceptability of scored darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets in HIV-1-infected children aged ≥6 to <12 years, using matching placebo tablets: A randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was developed as a once-daily, complete antiretroviral (ARV) regimen therapy to address the need for simplified protease inhibitor-based ARV regimens. This study assessed the swallowability and acceptability for long-term use of scored placebo tablets matching the D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets in children living with HIV-1. METHODS: This study (NCT04006704) was a Phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study in children living with HIV-1, aged ≥6 to <12 years and weighing ≥25 to <40 kg, on a stable ARV regimen for ≥3 months. Participants were asked to swallow whole (size, 21 × 11 × 7 mm) and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets. Swallowability of the matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets (primary endpoint) was assessed by observers. Acceptability of taking matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets and current ARVs was evaluated by participants using a 3-point questionnaire. Participants rated the acceptability for long-term daily use of the placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets, and observers assessed how easily caregivers could split a scored tablet by hand, using 3-point questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the 24 participants who enrolled and completed the study, 95.8% (23/24) were able to swallow the whole and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets after 1 or 2 attempts. Most participants (>70%) rated the acceptability of tablets for long-term daily use as acceptable or good to take. Breaking the tablets was considered easy or OK by 79.2% (19/24) of caregivers. CONCLUSION: Scored D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets are swallowable - with whole favoured over split - and considered at least acceptable for long-term daily intake in children living with HIV-1 aged ≥6 to <12 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04006704.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in children aged 2 years and older with virologically suppressed HIV: a phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is a single-tablet regimen and was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with HIV (aged 6 years to <18 years) in a 48-week phase 2/3 trial. In this study, we report data from children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. METHODS: We conducted this open-label, multicentre, multicohort, single-arm study in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Participants were virologically suppressed children with HIV, aged at least 2 years, weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. Participants received bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) once daily, switching to bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) upon attaining a bodyweight of at least 25 kg. The study included pharmacokinetic evaluation at week 2 to confirm the dose of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for this weight band by comparing with previous adult data. Primary outcomes were bictegravir area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) at week 2, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities until the end of week 24 in all participants who received at least one dose of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02881320. FINDINGS: Overall, 22 participants were screened (from Nov 14, 2018, to Jan 11, 2020), completed treatment with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (until week 48), and entered an extension phase. The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio for AUCtau for bictegravir was 7·6% higher than adults (GLSM ratio 107·6%, 90% CI 96·7-119·7); Ctau was 34·6% lower than adults (65·4%, 49·1-87·2). Both parameters were within the target exposure range previously found in adults, children, or both". Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in four (18%) participants by the end week 24 and six (27%) by the end of week 48. Drug-related adverse events occurred in three participants (14%) by the end of week 24 and week 48; none were severe. No Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred by the end of week 24 and week 48. INTERPRETATION: Data support the use of single-tablet coformulated bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) for treatment of HIV in children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) single and its combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are targeted treatments for B-cell tumors but have significant side effects. This study assesses and contrasts the side effects of BTKis alone and its four combination therapies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to analyze the data on three BTKis monotherapies and combinations of ibrutinib with rituximab, obinutuzumab, venetoclax, and lenalidomide in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database up to December 2022. RESULTS: We analyzed the top 20 PTs for each treatment regimen. In monotherapies, atrial fibrillation (ROR (95% CI): 9.88 (9.47-10.32)) in zanubrutinib and rash (6.97 (5.42-8.98)) in acalabrutinib had higher associations. In combinations, infection (6.86 (6.11-7.70)), atrial fibrillation (27.96 (22.61-34.58)) and myelosuppression (10.09 (8.89-11.46)) were vital signals when ibrutinib was combined with obinutuzumab, and pyrexia (4.22 (2.57-6.93)) had a high signal value when combined with lenalidomide. Hemorrhage had a lower signal value when combined with venetoclax compared to ibrutinib alone (2.50 (2.18-2.87) vs 3.60 (3.52-3.68)). CONCLUSIONS: The ibrutinib-obinutuzumab combo has the highest risk of infection, atrial fibrillation, and myelosuppression, and the ibrutinib-lenalidomide combo has the highest risk of pyrexia. However, the ibrutinib-venetoclax combo has a lower risk of hemorrhage than monotherapy.

Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may have clinical benefit when administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab and followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in older patients with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 65 years of age or older to receive ibrutinib (560 mg, administered orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects) or placebo, plus six cycles of bendamustine (90 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and rituximab (375 mg per square meter). Patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) received rituximab maintenance therapy, administered every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigators. Overall survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 523 patients, 261 were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib and 262 to receive placebo. At a median follow-up of 84.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 80.6 months in the ibrutinib group and 52.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.96; P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with a complete response was 65.5% in the ibrutinib group and 57.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.06). Overall survival was similar in the two groups. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment was 81.5% in the ibrutinib group and 77.3% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib treatment in combination with standard chemoimmunotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of the combined therapy was consistent with the known profiles of the individual drugs. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and Pharmacyclics; SHINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776840.).

Obinutuzumab (GA-101), ibrutinib, and venetoclax (GIVe) frontline treatment for high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Despite considerable treatment advances with targeted therapies for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) deemed high-risk [del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation], the outcome is still inferior compared with other CLL patients. Combining multiple agents with distinct mechanisms of action may further improve outcomes. CLL2-GIVe is an open-label, multicenter trial which enrolled patients with previously untreated CLL with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. Patients received induction therapy with obinutuzumab (GA-101), ibrutinib, and venetoclax (GIVe) for cycles 1 through 6 and consolidation therapy with venetoclax and ibrutinib for cycles 7 through 12. Ibrutinib monotherapy was continued for cycles 13 through 36 in patients not reaching a complete response (CR) with serial undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) after consolidation. The primary endpoint was CR rate at cycle 15 (final restaging). Secondary endpoints included MRD, survival, and safety. All 41 patients enrolled between September 2016 and August 2018 received study treatment and were included in efficacy and safety populations. With a CR rate of 58.5% at cycle 15, the primary endpoint was met (95% CI: 42.1-73.7; P < .001). At final restaging, 78.0% of patients had uMRD in peripheral blood (PB); 65.9% of patients had uMRD in bone marrow (BM). Estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 24 months were both 95.1%. Adverse events were reported in all patients; most were low grade (grade ≥3: 23.9%). Two deaths were reported (cardiac failure and ovarian carcinoma), neither related to study treatment. The CLL2-GIVe treatment regimen has a manageable safety profile and is a first-line treatment of good efficacy for patients with high-risk CLL.

Ferrostatin-1 and 3-Methyladenine Ameliorate Ferroptosis in OVA-Induced Asthma Model and in IL-13-Challenged BEAS-2B Cells.

Ferroptosis was reported to be involved in the occurrence and development of asthma. However, the potential mechanism underlying the role of ferroptosis in asthma remains unclear. In this study, we established the mouse asthma model following the ovalbumin (OVA) method in C57BL/6 mice and the cell model with IL-13 induction in bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B cells). Treatment of ferrostatin-1 (Ferr-1) and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) decreased iron deposition in IL-13-induced BEAS-2B cells and lung tissues of asthma mice, opposite to that in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Meanwhile, excessive lipid peroxidation asthma model in vivo and in vitro was alleviated by Ferr-1 or 3-MA treatment. In addition, Ferr-1 and 3-MA inhibited the expression of LC-3 in these cells and lung tissues of mice. Moreover, Ferr-1 and 3-MA also suppressed the production of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α) and oxidative stress factors (ROS and MDA), while promoting the level of SOD, in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, application of Ferr-1 exhibited a greater inhibitory effect on iron release and lipid peroxidation in IL-13-induced BEAS-2B cells and asthma mice than 3-MA, accompanied with a weaker effect on ferritinophagy than 3-MA. Collectively, Ferr-1 and 3-MA ameliorated asthma in vivo and in vitro through inhibiting ferroptosis, providing a new strategy for the clinical treatment of asthma.

Ibrutinib in Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Lower Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation.

INTRODUCTION: Therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with drugs such as ibrutinib and rituximab is often associated with immune suppression, opportunistic infections, and reactivation of virus infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV). This risk is especially important in geographical regions like Asia where many potential therapy recipients have HBV infection. Also, whether safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in Asians and Europeans with advanced CLL/SLL are similar is unknown. We determined the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib compared with rituximab in advanced CLL/SLL including persons with HBV infection. We compared outcomes with data published from trials in persons of European descent. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, phase-3 trial (NCT01973387). Subjects with advanced CLL/SLL were randomized 2:1 to receive ibrutinib, 420 mg/day, or rituximab, 500 mg/mE + 2, for 6 cycles. Subjects with resolved HBV infection were included. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), survival, and adverse events including resolved HBV reactivation. RESULTS: 131 subjects received ibrutinib (N = 87) or rituximab (N = 44) including 53 with resolved HBV infection. Median follow-up was 31 months (95% confidence interval: 28, 32 months). ORR was 61% (50, 71%) versus 7% (2, 18%; p < 0.001). Median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib cohort but must be >40 months versus 8 months (7, 9 months; p < 0.0001) in the rituximab cohort. Median survival was not reached but must be >40 months versus 27 months (17 months, NE; p = 0.0006). In multivariable analyses, receiving ibrutinib increased PFS (hazard rate [HR] for failure = 0.12 [0.06, 0.23]; p < 0.001) and decreased risk of death (HR = 0.31 [0.15, 0.63]; p < 0.001). Median duration of exposure to ibrutinib was significantly longer than exposure to rituximab (28 vs. 5 months). The safety profile of ibrutinib was consistent with that observed in previous studies with no new safety signal. No subject receiving ibrutinib had HBV reactivation versus 2 receiving rituximab, despite much greater use of drugs to prevent HBV reactivation in the rituximab cohort. Outcomes were like those reported in persons of European descent, except ORR which, was unreliably correlated with PFS in Asians. CONCLUSION: Ibrutinib is safe and effective in persons with advanced CLL/SLL and better than rituximab in all therapy outcomes including risk of HBV reactivation. Outcomes with ibrutinib in Chinese were like those reported in persons of predominately European descent.

Survival, causes of death, and the prognostic role of comorbidities in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the pre-ibrutinib era: A population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in survival and causes of death in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in a nationwide study. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 13,009 Swedish CLL patients diagnosed 1982-2013. Relative survival (RS) and excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using flexible parametric survival models. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for the linear effect of 10-year increase in year of diagnosis. RESULTS: The excess mortality decreased comparing 2003-2013 to 1982-1992 (EMRR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.58). The 5-year RS increased between 1982 and 2012 for patients >51 years at diagnosis and improved for patients ≤51 years after 2002. The rate of CLL-specific deaths decreased over time (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81). Compared to patients with no comorbidity, patients with 1 and 2+ Charlson Comorbidity Index points had HR = 1.35 (95% CI 1.25-1.45) and HR = 1.47 (95% CI 1.37-1.57) for CLL-related mortality, respectively. CONCLUSION: Survival in CLL patients improved in the era of chemoimmunotherapy, and this was largely explained by reduced CLL-related mortality. The increased rate of CLL-related mortality in patients with comorbidities emphasizes the importance of the newer and better tolerated targeted therapy.

Mitochondrial Bioenergetic and Proteomic Phenotyping Reveals Organ-Specific Consequences of Chronic Kidney Disease in Mice.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) results in reduced kidney function, uremia, and accumulation of uremic metabolites. Mitochondrial alterations have been suggested to play a role in the disease pathology within various tissues. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive bioenergetic and proteomic phenotyping of mitochondria from skeletal muscle (SkM), cardiac muscle (CM), and renal tissue from mice with CKD. The 5-month-old C57BL/6J male mice were fed a casein control or adenine-supplemented diet for 6 months. CKD was confirmed by blood urea nitrogen. A mitochondrial diagnostic workflow was employed to examine respiratory function, membrane and redox potential, reactive oxygen species production, and maximal activities of matrix dehydrogenases and electron transport system (ETS) protein complexes. Additionally, tandem-mass-tag-assisted proteomic analyses were performed to uncover possible differences in mitochondrial protein abundance. CKD negatively impacted mitochondrial energy transduction (all p < 0.05) in SkM, CM, and renal mitochondria, when assessed at physiologically relevant cellular energy demands (ΔGATP) and revealed the tissue-specific impact of CKD on mitochondrial health. Proteomic analyses indicated significant abundance changes in CM and renal mitochondria (115 and 164 proteins, p < 0.05), but no differences in SkM. Taken together, these findings reveal the tissue-specific impact of chronic renal insufficiency on mitochondrial health.

Real-world ibrutinib dose reductions, holds and discontinuations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Aim: A retrospective chart review of ibrutinib-treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was conducted. Patients & methods: Adults with CLL who initiated ibrutinib were followed for ≥6 months (n = 180). Results: Twenty-five percent of first-line ibrutinib patients experienced ≥1 dose reduction, mainly due to adverse events (AEs; 79%). Treatment discontinuations and dose holds occurred in 20 and 34% of patients, respectively, most commonly due to AEs (73 and 74%). Approximately one-quarter of relapsed/refractory ibrutinib patients experienced ≥1 dose reduction, mainly due to AEs (88%). Treatment discontinuation and dose holds occurred in 40% of patients (58 and 76% due to AEs, respectively). Conclusion: Dose reductions, holds and discontinuations were frequent in patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib in routine clinical practice.

Lay abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a cancer that develops from a type of white blood cells called 'B cells.' Ibrutinib is a targeted therapy that inhibits the activity of a protein called Bruton's tyrosine kinase, which plays a key role in CLL. Patients receiving ibrutinib treatment can experience side effects ('adverse events'). In addition, patients may need to reduce their drug dose ('dose reductions') or stop treatment ('discontinuations') for a variety of reasons. We reviewed patients' charts to describe dose reductions and discontinuations in ibrutinib-treated patients with CLL. Our results indicate that dose reductions and discontinuations were frequent in patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib in routine clinical practice, and that the most common reason was adverse events.

Clinical pharmacology and PK/PD translation of the second-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, zanubrutinib.

Introduction: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Zanubrutinib was designed to achieve improved therapeutic concentrations and minimize off-target activities putatively accounting, in part, for the adverse effects seen with other BTK inhibitors.Areas covered: This drug profile covers zanubrutinib clinical pharmacology and the translation of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to clinical efficacy and safety profiles, by highlighting key differences between zanubrutinib and other BTK inhibitors. We discuss PK, sustained BTK occupancy, and potential factors affecting PK of zanubrutinib, including food effects, hepatic impairment, and drug-drug interactions. These data, along with exposure-response analyses, were used to support the recommended dose of 320 mg, either once daily or as 160 mg twice daily. Translation of PK/PD attributes into clinical effects was demonstrated in a randomized, phase 3 head-to-head study comparing it with ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.Expert opinion: Among the approved BTK inhibitors, zanubrutinib is less prone to PK modulation by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, leading to more consistent, sustained therapeutic exposures and improved dosing convenience. Zanubrutinib PK/PD has translated into durable responses and improved safety, representing an important new treatment option for patients who benefit from BTK therapy.

Rituximab-Lenalidomide-Ibrutinib Combination for Relapsed/Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Case Series of the LOC Network.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the association rituximab-lenalidomide-ibrutinib (R2I) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). METHODS: R/R PCNSL patients treated with R2I were retrospectively selected and analyzed from the French LOC database. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (median age: 63 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status: 75%) received R2I, administered after a median of 2 previous lines of chemotherapy, including autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 5 cases. The best response was complete response in 4/14 patients and partial response in 4/14 patients, achieved in a median of 2.5 months. Three responder patients received consolidation treatment (WBRT: N = 2, ASCT: N = 1) after R2I, and R2I served as a bridge before CAR-T cell therapy for one patient. R2I was discontinued due to toxicity in 3/14 patients. There were no toxicity-related deaths. DISCUSSION: The R2I combination resulted in a high rate of response of rapid-onset in heavily pretreated patients with poor prognosis, with manageable toxicity, and allowed 3 patients to proceed to consolidation. Although preliminary, these results support the use of R2I for R/R PCNSL failing conventional chemotherapies. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that combination of rituximab-lenalidomide-ibrutinib induces a high rate of response in heavily pretreated R/R PCNSL.

How to Sequence Therapies in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.

OPINION STATEMENT: There are multiple treatment options in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, including chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, and covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. The choice of therapy should take into account the patient's clinical presentation, comorbidities, and preferences. A thorough discussion should take place to outline the administration, safety, and efficacy of the regimens under consideration. The patient's genomic profile can provide insightful information for the treatment selection. In the frontline and relapsed settings, we favor ibrutinib monotherapy over chemoimmunotherapy or proteasome inhibitor-based regimens in patients with MYD88 and without CXCR4 mutations. For patients with MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations or without MYD88 or CXCR4 mutations, chemoimmunotherapy or proteasome inhibitor-based regimens are favored, but efficacy data with ibrutinib in combination with rituximab and with novel covalent BTK inhibitors are emerging. Autologous stem cell transplant should be considered in special cases in the relapsed setting. Participation in clinical trials is positively encouraged in WM patients in frontline and relapsed settings. Agents of interest include the BCL2 antagonist venetoclax, the CXCR4 inhibitor mavorixafor, and the non-covalent BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib and ARQ-531.

Assessing the pharmacokinetics of acalabrutinib in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: The first-in-class BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has substantially changed the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The next-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib is more selective and may have less off-target toxicities as compared to ibrutinib. Acalabrutinib has demonstrated safety and efficacy in CLL and has been approved to treat CLL. AREAS COVERED: Current clinical trials investigated acalabrutinib monotherapy or acalabrutinib-based combination therapies in relapsed/refractory and treatment-naive CLL. Data on the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib in clinical trials were summarized in this review. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of acalabrutinib were also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Acalabrutinib selectively inhibits BTK by covalent binding and shows rapid absorption and elimination. Acalabrutinib does not inhibit EGFR, TEC, or ITK and shows fewer off-target toxicities. Completed phase 3 trials have demonstrated that acalabrutinib improves the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and patients with treatment-naive CLL. The phase 3 trial that evaluates acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib has met its primary endpoint. Early phase studies suggested the combinations of acalabrutinib with a CD20 antibody and venetoclax led to high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease in the bone marrow in CLL patients and might provide a fixed-duration therapeutic option for patients with CLL.

Adverse event burden in older patients with CLL receiving bendamustine plus rituximab or ibrutinib regimens: Alliance A041202.

Ibrutinib has superior progression-free survival compared with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in older CLL patients, however, differences in treatment duration, six monthly BR cycles versus continuous ibrutinib, complicate adverse event (AE) comparisons. We introduce the AE burden score (AEsc) to compare AEs, calculated for each patient by summing over products of reporting period length and grade for each all-cause grade 1-4 AE and dividing by the length of time over which AEs are assessed. A total of 176 patients received BR and 361 ibrutinib alone or with six cycles of rituximab. At 38 months median follow-up, 64% remained on ibrutinib. Median AEsc was higher with BR versus ibrutinib in the first six cycles (7.2 versus 4.9, p < 0.0001). Within ibrutinib arms, median AEsc decreased significantly to 3.7 after six cycles (p < 0.0001). 10% and 14% of BR and ibrutinib patients discontinued treatment for AEs. In ibrutinib arms, cumulative incidence of grade 3 or higher atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and infection (AEs of clinical interest) at 12 months was 4.5%, 17.5%, and 12.8%, respectively, and increased more slowly thereafter to 7.7%, 25.4%, and 20.5% at 36 months. Analytical tools including the AEsc and cumulative incidence of AEs can help to better characterize AE burden over time. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01886872.

Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective.

In the past few years, Bruton's tyrosine Kinase (Btk) has emerged as new target in medicinal chemistry. Since approval of ibrutinib in 2013 for treatment of different hematological cancers (as leukemias and lymphomas), two other irreversible Btk inhibitors have been launched on the market. In the attempt to overcome irreversible Btk inhibitor limitations, reversible compounds have been developed and are currently under evaluation. In recent years, many Btk inhibitors have been patented and reported in the literature. In this review, we summarized the (ir)reversible Btk inhibitors recently developed and studied clinical trials and preclinical investigations for malignancies, chronic inflammation conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection, covering advances in the field of medicinal chemistry. Furthermore, the nanoformulations studied to increase ibrutinib bioavailability are reported.

Acalabrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of the First Randomized Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: Among Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, acalabrutinib has greater selectivity than ibrutinib, which we hypothesized would improve continuous therapy tolerability. We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority, phase III trial comparing acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS: Patients with previously treated CLL with centrally confirmed del(17)(p13.1) or del(11)(q22.3) were randomly assigned to oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily or ibrutinib 420 mg once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed noninferiority of progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Overall, 533 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 268; ibrutinib, n = 265) were randomly assigned. At the data cutoff, 124 (46.3%) acalabrutinib patients and 109 (41.1%) ibrutinib patients remained on treatment. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, acalabrutinib was determined to be noninferior to ibrutinib with a median PFS of 38.4 months in both arms (95% CI acalabrutinib, 33.0 to 38.6 and ibrutinib, 33.0 to 41.6; hazard ratio: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.27). All-grade atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter incidence was significantly lower with acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib (9.4% v 16.0%; P = .02); among other selected secondary end points, grade 3 or higher infections (30.8% v 30.0%) and Richter transformations (3.8% v 4.9%) were comparable between groups and median overall survival was not reached in either arm (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.15), with 63 (23.5%) deaths with acalabrutinib and 73 (27.5%) with ibrutinib. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events occurred in 14.7% of acalabrutinib-treated patients and 21.3% of ibrutinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION: In this first direct comparison of less versus more selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CLL, acalabrutinib demonstrated noninferior PFS with fewer cardiovascular adverse events.

Ibrutinib plus rituximab for the treatment of adult patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: a safety evaluation.

Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), an orphan disease, is a rare low-grade B-cell lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with unique clinical features and monoclonal IgM production. Rituximab remains to this date the backbone of most commonly used treatment combinations. The FDA/EMA approval of Ibrutinib, the first-in-class BTK inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab, changed the treatment landscape of the disease.Areas covered: Clinical trial data that demonstrate mode of action, efficacy, and the safety profile of each agent will be covered. A safety analysis of the combination treatment will also be performed to point out its high efficacy and overall favorable toxicity profile. The disadvantages and treatment gaps that still exist in the treatment of WM which relate to the need for long-term ibrutinib administration and the lack of deep remissions and subsequent disease relapse, will also be reviewed.Expert opinion: The ibrutinib-rituximab combination is both effective and safe, in the newly-diagnosed and relapsed-refractory disease setting. The optimal therapeutic approach for WM patients remains however to be established. The question of which combinatory (or synergistic) regimen can allow for a fixed-treatment duration, deep and durable responses with a safe toxicity profile is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials.