Data-driven subtypes of mixed semantic-logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Linguistic features, biomarker profiles and brain metabolic patterns.

Mixed primary progressive aphasia (mPPA) accounts for a substantial proportion of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) cases. However, the lack of a standardised definition of this condition has resulted in misclassification of PPA cases. In this study, we enrolled 55 patients diagnosed with PPA, comprising 12 semantic variant (svPPA), 23 logopenic variant (lvPPA), and 20 mPPA cases with linguistic characteristics consistent with both svPPA and lvPPA (s/lvPPA). All patients underwent language assessments, evaluation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers (via cerebrospinal fluid analysis or Amyloid-PET), and 18F-FDG-PET brain scans. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) analysis based on linguistic characteristics revealed two distinct clusters within the s/lvPPA group: cluster k1 (n = 10) displayed an AD-like biomarker profile, with lower levels of Aß42 and Aß42/Aß40 ratio, along with higher levels of t-tau and p-tau compared to cluster k2 (n = 10). Interestingly, k1 exhibited linguistic features that were similar to those of svPPA. Both clusters exhibited extensive temporoparietal hypometabolism. These findings support the hypothesis that a subgroup of s/lvPPA may represent a clinical manifestation of AD-related PPA.

Evaluation of a novel immunoassay to detect p-tau Thr217 in the CSF to distinguish Alzheimer disease from other dementias.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tau phosphorylated at Thr217 (p-tau T217) assay in CSF can distinguish patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) from patients with other dementias and healthy controls. METHODS: We developed and validated a novel Simoa immunoassay to detect p-tau T217 in CSF. There was a total of 190 participants from 3 cohorts with AD (n = 77) and other neurodegenerative diseases (n = 69) as well as healthy participants (n = 44). RESULTS: The p-tau T217 assay (cutoff 242 pg/mL) identified patients with AD with accuracy of 90%, with 78% positive predictive value (PPV), 97% negative predictive value (NPV), 93% sensitivity, and 88% specificity, compared favorably with p-tau T181 ELISA (52 pg/mL), showing 78% accuracy, 58% PPV, 98% NPV, 71% specificity, and 97% sensitivity. The assay distinguished patients with AD from age-matched healthy controls (cutoff 163 pg/mL, 98% sensitivity, 93% specificity), similarly to p-tau T181 ELISA (cutoff 60 pg/mL, 96% sensitivity, 86% specificity). In patients with AD, we found a strong correlation between p-tau T217 and p-tau T181, total tau and ß-amyloid 40, but not ß-amyloid 42. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that p-tau T217 displayed better diagnostic accuracy than p-tau T181. The data suggest that the new p-tau T217 assay has potential as an AD diagnostic test in clinical evaluation. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that a CSF immunoassay for p-tau T217 distinguishes patients with AD from patients with other dementias and healthy controls.

Validated automatic speech biomarkers in primary progressive aphasia.

Objective: To automatically extract and quantify specific disease biomarkers of prosody from the acoustic properties of speech in patients with primary progressive aphasia. Methods: We analyzed speech samples from 59 progressive aphasic patients (non-fluent/agrammatic = 15, semantic = 21, logopenic = 23; ages 50-85 years) and 31 matched healthy controls (ages 54-89 years). Using a novel, automated speech analysis protocol, we extracted acoustic measurements of prosody, including fundamental frequency and speech and silent pause durations, and compared these between groups. We then examined their relationships with clinical tests, gray matter atrophy, and cerebrospinal fluid analytes. Results: We found a narrowed range of fundamental frequency in patients with non-fluent/agrammatic variant aphasia (mean 3.86 ± 1.15 semitones) compared with healthy controls (6.06 ± 1.95 semitones; P < 0.001) and patients with semantic variant aphasia (6.12 ± 1.77 semitones; P = 0.001). Mean pause rate was significantly increased in the non-fluent/agrammatic group (mean 61.4 ± 20.8 pauses per minute) and the logopenic group (58.7 ± 16.4 pauses per minute) compared to controls. In an exploratory analysis, narrowed fundamental frequency range was associated with atrophy in the left inferior frontal cortex. Cerebrospinal level of phosphorylated tau was associated with an acoustic classifier combining fundamental frequency range and pause rate (r = 0.58, P = 0.007). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with this combined classifier distinguished non-fluent/agrammatic speakers from healthy controls (AUC = 0.94) and from semantic variant patients (AUC = 0.86). Interpretation: Restricted fundamental frequency range and increased pause rate are characteristic markers of speech in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. These can be extracted with automated speech analysis and are associated with left inferior frontal atrophy and cerebrospinal phosphorylated tau level.

Evaluation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Chain as a Routine Biomarker in a Memory Clinic.

Systematic evaluation of biomarkers in representative populations is needed to validate their clinical utility. In this work, we assessed the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain (NfL) in a neurocognitive clinical setting. A total of 51 patients with different cognitive clinical syndromes and 11 cognitively normal individuals were evaluated in a memory clinic in Argentina. Clinical conditions included mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 12), dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT, n = 14), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, n = 13), and primary progressive aphasia (logopenic [n = 6], semantic [n = 2], and nonfluent [n = 4]). We quantified CSF NfL and core Alzheimer's disease biomarkers using commercially available ELISA kits. Cortical thickness was analyzed on brain magnetic resonance imaging scans from 10 controls and 10 patients. CSF NfL was significantly increased in MCI, FTD, and DAT patients compared with controls (Kruskal-Wallis, p < .0001). Interestingly, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) value when analyzing control versus bvFTD patients (AUC = 0.9441). Also, we observed a marginally significant correlation between NfL levels and left orbitofrontal cortex thickness in a small group of patients with FTD. Overall, our results further support CSF NfL as a promising biomarker in the diagnostic workup of bvFTD.

Parietal Involvement in the Semantic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia with Alzheimer's Disease Cerebrospinal Fluid Profile.

Semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is typically associated with non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, some anatomopathological studies have found AD lesions in those patients. We compared brain perfusion SPECT of 18 svPPA patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers indicative of non-AD pathology (svPPA-nonAD) and three svPPA patients with CSF biomarkers indicative of underlying AD (svPPA-AD). All svPPA patients had severe left temporopolar hypoperfusion. SvPPA-nonAD had additional anterior cingulate and mediofrontal hypoperfusion, whereas svPPA-AD had greater left parietal and posterior cingulate involvement. Parietal damage in svPPA constitutes a biomarker for underlying Alzheimer pathology thus refining the classification of this PPA variant.

A language-based sum score for the course and therapeutic intervention in primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND: With upcoming therapeutic interventions for patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), instruments for the follow-up of patients are needed to describe disease progression and to evaluate potential therapeutic effects. So far, volumetric brain changes have been proposed as clinical endpoints in the literature, but cognitive scores are still lacking. This study followed disease progression predominantly in language-based performance within 1 year and defined a PPA sum score which can be used in therapeutic interventions. METHODS: We assessed 28 patients with nonfluent variant PPA, 17 with semantic variant PPA, 13 with logopenic variant PPA, and 28 healthy controls in detail for 1 year. The most informative neuropsychological assessments were combined to a sum score, and associations between brain atrophy were investigated followed by a sample size calculation for clinical trials. RESULTS: Significant absolute changes up to 20% in cognitive tests were found after 1 year. Semantic and phonemic word fluency, Boston Naming Test, Digit Span, Token Test, AAT Written language, and Cookie Test were identified as the best markers for disease progression. These tasks provide the basis of a new PPA sum score. Assuming a therapeutic effect of 50% reduction in cognitive decline for sample size calculations, a number of 56 cases is needed to find a significant treatment effect. Correlations between cognitive decline and atrophy showed a correlation up to r = 0.7 between the sum score and frontal structures, namely the superior and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as with left-sided subcortical structures. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the high performance of the proposed sum score in the follow-up of PPA and recommend it as an outcome measure in intervention studies.

Clinical value of neurofilament and phospho-tau/tau ratio in the frontotemporal dementia spectrum.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical value of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and the phospho-tau/total tau ratio (p/t-tau) across the entire frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum in a large, well-defined cohort. METHODS: CSF NfL and p/t-tau levels were studied in 361 patients with FTD: 179 behavioral variant FTD, 17 FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND), 36 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 19 nonfluent variant PPA, 4 logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA), 42 corticobasal syndrome, and 64 progressive supranuclear palsy. Forty-five cognitively healthy controls were also included. Definite pathology was known in 68 patients (49 frontotemporal lobar degeneration [FTLD]-TDP, 18 FTLD-tau, 1 FTLD-FUS). RESULTS: NfL was higher in all diagnoses, except lvPPA (n = 4), than in controls, equally elevated in behavioral variant FTD, semantic variant PPA, nonfluent variant PPA, and corticobasal syndrome, and highest in FTD-MND. The p/t-tau was lower in all clinical groups, except lvPPA, than in controls and lowest in FTD-MND. NfL did not discriminate between TDP and tau pathology, while the p/t-tau ratio had a good specificity (76%) and moderate sensitivity (67%). Both high NfL and low p/t-tau were associated with poor survival (hazard ratio on tertiles 1.7 for NfL, 0.7 for p/t-tau). CONCLUSION: NfL and p/t-tau similarly discriminated FTD from controls, but not between clinical subtypes, apart from FTD-MND. Both markers predicted survival and are promising monitoring biomarkers for clinical trials. Of note, p/t-tau, but not NfL, was specific to discriminate TDP from tau pathology in vivo. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with cognitive issues, CSF NfL and p/t-tau levels discriminate between those with and without FTD spectrum disorders.

Cerebral microbleeds and CSF Alzheimer biomarkers in primary progressive aphasias.

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the prevalence and localization of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in the 3 main variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) (logopenic, semantic, and nonfluent/agrammatic), to identify the relationship with underlying Alzheimer pathology, and to explore whether CMBs contribute to language breakdown. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design in a multicenter cohort of 82 patients with PPA and 19 similarly aged healthy controls. MRI allowed for rating CMBs (2-dimensional gradient recalled echo T2*, susceptibility weighted imaging sequences) and white matter hyperintensities. CSF Alzheimer disease biomarker analyses available in 63 of the 82 patients provided the stratification of PPA into subgroups with patients who had or did not have probable underlying Alzheimer pathology. RESULTS: The prevalence of CMBs was higher in patients with PPA (28%) than in controls (16%). They were more prevalent in logopenic PPA (50%) than in semantic PPA (18%) and nonfluent/agrammatic PPA (17%). The localization of CMBs was mainly lobar (81%) with no difference between the PPA variants. CMBs were more frequent in PPA patients with positive than with negative CSF Alzheimer disease biomarkers (67% vs 20%). Patients with and without lobar CMBs had similar volumes of white matter hyperintensities. Language and general cognitive impairment in PPA was unrelated to CMB rates. CONCLUSIONS: CMB prevalence in PPA is higher than in healthy controls. CMBs were most prevalent in the logopenic variant, were related to underlying Alzheimer pathology, and did not affect the language/cognitive impairment. Our findings also suggest that CMB detection with MRI contributes to PPA variant diagnosis, especially of logopenic PPA, and provides an estimator of the underlying neuropathology.

Frontotemporal Dementia due to the Novel GRN Arg161GlyfsX36 Mutation.

Progranulin is a multifunctional growth factor mainly expressed in neurons and microglia. Loss-of-function mutations in the Granulin (GRN) gene are causative of frontotemporal dementia with TAR DNA-binding protein-43 inclusions. We reported the case of a 51-year-old male patient affected by sporadic agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia, in whom we identified a novel heterozygous deletion in the exon 6 (g.10338_39delAG, p.Arg161GlyfsX36). Plasma progranulin levels were significantly reduced and in silico analysis predicted a premature termination codon. This case expands our knowledge on GRN mutations in frontotemporal dementia.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers as a Diagnostic Tool of the Underlying Pathology of Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) may present with three main clinical variants, namely nonfluent agrammatic (nfaPPA), semantic (sPPA), and logopenic (lPPA) subtypes. Frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the most common etiologies. OBJECTIVE: To study the potential of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for identifying the underlying pathology in patients with PPA. METHODS: CSF levels of total tau protein (τT), amyloid-ß peptide (Aß42), and tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (τP - 181) were measured by double sandwich, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 43 patients with PPA, 26 patients with AD, and 17 healthy controls. RESULTS: All patients could be classified as compatible with the AD or non-AD biomarker profile, either with the three biomarkers (90.7%) or their ratios, especially the τP - 181/Aß42 ratio (9.3%). An AD-compatible biomarker profile was present in 39.5% of all PPA patients, specifically 22.2%, 35.7%, and 75% of nfaPPA, sPPA, and lPPA, respectively. In PPA patients with a non-AD profile (presumably FTLD), two different clusters could be identified according to the τP - 181/τT ratio, possibly corresponding to the two major FTLD pathologies (tau and TDP-43). CONCLUSION: CSF biomarkers may be a valuable tool for the discrimination between PPA patients with AD and non-AD pathophysiology and possibly between FTLD patients with tau and TDP-43 pathology.

Primary Progressive Aphasia in the Network of French Alzheimer Plan Memory Centers.

BACKGROUND: Few demographical data about primary progressive aphasia (PPA) are available, and most knowledge regarding PPA is based on tertiary centers' results. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to describe demographical characteristics of the PPA population in a large sample of PPA patients from the network of French Alzheimer plan memory centers (Sample 1), and to describe the stratification of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in two different samples of PPA patients (Samples 2 and 3). METHODS: All registered PPA patients in the French Alzheimer's disease (AD) databank (Sample 1: n = 2,035) and a subsample (Sample 2: n = 65) derived from a multicentric prospective cohort with CSF biomarker analysis were analyzed. A multicentric retrospective cohort from language expert tertiary centers (Sample 3: n = 97) with CSF biomarker analysis was added. Sample 3 was added to replicate the CSF results of the Sample 2 and to evaluate repartition of AD pathology in the three variant of PPA according to the latest classification. RESULTS: Non-Fluent/Agrammatic, Logopenic, and Unclassifiable PPA patients (NF/A-Logo-Unclass PPA) were older and more frequent than Semantic PPA patients (2.2 versus 0.8/100,000 inhabitants; p < 0.00001). Male predominance occurred after the age of 80 (p < 0.00001). A higher level of education was observed in the PPA population compared to a typical amnesic AD group. No demographical significant difference between PPA due to AD and not due to AD was observed. The Logopenic variant was most frequent with 85% of AD CSF biomarker profiles (35% in NF/A PPA; 20% in Semantic PPA). CONCLUSION: PPA occurs also in an elderly population, especially in male patients over 80. CSF biomarkers are useful to stratify PPA. The epidemiology of PPA should be further investigated to confirm gender and cognitive reserve role in PPA to better understand the factors and mechanisms leading to this language-predominant deficit during neurodegenerative diseases.

Childhood Learning Disabilities and Atypical Dementia: A Retrospective Chart Review.

OBJECTIVE: To further our understanding of the association between self-reported childhood learning disabilities (LDs) and atypical dementia phenotypes (Atypical Dementia), including logopenic primary progressive aphasia (L-PPA), Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA), and Dysexecutive-type Alzheimer's Disease (AD). METHODS: This retrospective case series analysis of 678 comprehensive neuropsychological assessments compared rates of self-reported LD between dementia patients diagnosed with Typical AD and those diagnosed with Atypical Dementia. 105 cases with neuroimaging or CSF data available and at least one neurology follow-up were identified as having been diagnosed by the neuropsychologist with any form of neurodegenerative dementia. These cases were subject to a consensus diagnostic process among three dementia experts using validated clinical criteria for AD and PPA. LD was considered Probable if two or more statements consistent with prior LD were documented within the Social & Developmental History of the initial neuropsychological evaluation. RESULTS: 85 subjects (Typical AD n=68, Atypical AD n=17) were included in the final analysis. In logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, handedness, education and symptom duration, patients with Probable LD, compared to patients without Probable LD, were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with Atypical Dementia vs. Typical AD (OR 13.1, 95% CI 1.3-128.4). All three of the L-PPA cases reporting a childhood LD endorsed childhood difficulty with language. By contrast, both PCA cases reporting Probable childhood LD endorsed difficulty with attention and/or math. CONCLUSIONS: In people who develop dementia, childhood LD may predispose to atypical phenotypes. Future studies are required to confirm whether atypical neurodevelopment predisposes to regional-specific neuropathology in AD and other dementias.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers can play a pivotal role in the diagnostic work up of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND: Three variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) have been currently characterized: non fluent/agrammatic (nfv-PPA), semantic (sv-PPA), and logopenic variant (lv-PPA). lv-PPA is most commonly associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD), while nfv-PPA and sv-PPA are related to frontotemporal lobar degeneration. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-ß42 (Aß42), total tau protein (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), frequently abnormal in AD, could constitute a useful tool in the PPA diagnostic work up, in order to identify subjects with an underlying AD pathology. METHODS: We measured CSF biomarker levels in a group of twenty-eight patients, fourteen lv-PPA, nine nfv-PPA, and five sv-PPA. RESULTS: Since there were no significant differences in any of the parameters investigated between nfv-PPA and sv-PPA, the two groups were considered as one (nfv/sv-PPA). At diagnosis, lv-PPA were older than nfv/sv-PPA patients (mean values: 70.7 versus 64.6 years, p = 0.02). CSF biomarker mean concentrations were significantly different in lv-PPA versus nfv/sv-PPA patients (p = 0.000): Aß42 350.64 versus 661.64 ng/L; tau 631.21 versus 232.71 ng/L; p-tau 101 versus 38.21 ng/L. According to the recent AD diagnostic criteria, (Cummings et al., 2013) eleven lv-PPA and only one nfv/sv-PPA showed a liquoral pattern typical for AD. Finally lv-PPA had CSF biomarker levels very similar to a sample of 72 AD patients from our Department. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that CSF biomarkers can easily and reliably detect those patients with language disorders due to an underlying AD pathology, thus offering the possibility of targeted therapeutic interventions. However, because of the small sample size, such analyses should be reproduced in larger populations of patients to confirm our data.

CSF levels of Aß1-38/Aß1-40/Aß1-42 and (11)C PiB-PET studies in three clinical variants of primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a cognitive syndrome characterized by progressive and isolated language impairments due to neurodegenerative diseases. Recently, an international group of experts published a Consensus Classification of the three PPA clinical variants (naPPA, svPPA and lvPPA). We analyzed 24 patients with PPA by cognitive functions, neuroimaging (MRI, (99 m)Tc ECD-SPECT, (11)C PiB-PET and FDG-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis (ptau-181, Aß1-42, Aß1-40 and Aß1-38), to elucidate relationships between neuroimaging studies and biochemical findings in the three PPA clinical variants. Cognitive and speech functions were measured by mini-mental state examination and standard language test of aphasia. The patients with lvPPA showed significant decreases in CSF Aß1-42 and ratios of Aß1-42/Aß1-40 and Aß1-42/Aß1-38, and significant increases in CSF ptau-181 and ratios of ptau-181/Aß1-42 and ptau-181/Aß1-38; these findings were similar to those of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We observed a higher frequency of the ApoE ε4 allele in the lvPPA patients relative to the two other PPA variants. In (11)C PiB-PET of lvPPA patients, PiB positive findings were detected in cortices of frontal, temporal and parietal lobes and the posterior cingulate, where massive Aß may accumulate due to AD. Our results of AD-CSF markers including Aß1-38 and (11)C PiB-PET in the lvPPA patients demonstrate a common pathological mechanism with the occurrence of AD.

Intact protein analysis of ubiquitin in cerebrospinal fluid by multiple reaction monitoring reveals differences in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

The impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is thought to be an early event in neurodegeneration, and monitoring UPS alterations might serve as a disease biomarker. Our aim was to establish an alternate method to antibody-based assays for the selective measurement of free monoubiquitin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Free monoubiquitin was measured with liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in CSF of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), Parkinson's disease (PD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The LC-MS/MS method showed excellent intra- and interassay precision (4.4-7.4% and 4.9-10.3%) and accuracy (100-107% and 100-106%). CSF ubiquitin concentration was increased compared with that of controls (33.0 ± 9.7 ng/mL) in AD (47.5 ± 13.1 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and CJD patients (171.5 ± 103.5 ng/mL, p < 0.001) but not in other neurodegenerative diseases. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of AD vs control patients revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.832, and the specificity and sensitivity were 75 and 75%, respectively. ROC analysis of AD and FTLD patients yielded an AUC of 0.776, and the specificity and sensitivity were 53 and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, our LC-MS/MS method may facilitate ubiquitin determination to a broader community and might help to discriminate AD, CJD, and FTLD patients.

Increased cerebrospinal fluid tau levels in logopenic variant of Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) display neuropathological differences from typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker levels between patients with lvPPA due to AD (lvPPA-AD), non-logopenic forms of AD (nlAD), and amnestic mild cognitive impairment due to AD (aMCI-AD). METHODS: CSF biomarker concentrations were assessed in 124 patients divided into three groups matched for age, level of education, center, and disease duration: lvPPA-AD (n = 30), nlAD (n = 67). and aMCI-AD (n = 27). RESULTS: p-Tau181 levels were higher in the lvPPA-AD group than in the aMCI-AD group (p < 0.05). Total tau levels were higher in the lvPPA-AD group versus those in the nlAD (p < 0.05) and aMCI-AD (p < 0.001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a more pronounced involvement of a taupathy in lvPPA-AD compared to aMCI-AD and a more important neuronal death in lvPPA-AD than in nlAD or aMCI-AD.

You don't say: dynamic aphasia, another variant of primary progressive aphasia?

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a language predominant neurodegenerative disorder that has three recognized variants: nonfluent/agrammatic, semantic, and logopenic. This report describes a 60-year-old man who presented with a progressive decline in verbal output that does not fit the currently accepted PPA subtypes. The patient exhibited a paucity of verbal output and impaired phonemic fluency with minimal associated language, cognitive, or behavioral deficits. Focal cortical thinning/hypometabolism of the left superior frontal region and a cerebrospinal fluid profile not consistent with Alzheimer's disease pathology were identified. This case of isolated progressive dynamic aphasia extends the current boundaries of PPA diagnostic variants.

Distinct brain perfusion pattern associated with CSF biomarkers profile in primary progressive aphasia.

OBJECTIVE: A new classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) was recently proposed to differentiate between non-fluent aphasia (NF-PPA), semantic variant of PPA (S-PPA) and logopenic aphasia (LPA) by their phenotypic presentations. CSF biomarkers (BM) may differentiate PPA with atypical Alzheimer's disease (AD) that presents with LPA from PPA with frontotemporal lobe degeneration that presents with either NF-PPA or S-PPA. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was used to investigate brain hypoperfusion differences among PPA subtypes according to their CSF AD profiles. METHODS: 34 PPA patients underwent lumbar puncture and brain perfusion SPECT. PPA patients were classified into two subgroups according to the Aß(42):tau ratio: PPA BM positive (with an AD CSF profile) and PPA BM negative (not having an AD CSF profile). The biological classification was made while blind to the phenotypical presentation. The brain perfusion profiles of the PPA subgroups were compared with those of 24 healthy subjects. RESULTS: PPA BM positive patients had left-side predominant hypoperfusion in the temporoparietal cortex that extended to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and perisylvian region while PPA BM negative patients had hypoperfusion that was predominant in the temporal poles (p<10(-4) corrected). CONCLUSION: Distinct hypoperfusion patterns in PPA BM positive and PPA BM negative patients were observed, similar to those that have been described for S-PPA and LPA. These results support using CSF biomarkers to classify PPA.

Cerebrospinal fluid tau, p-tau 181 and amyloid-ß38/40/42 in frontotemporal dementias and primary progressive aphasias.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We determined cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of amyloid-ß (Aß)(1-38), Aß(1-40), Aß(1-42), total tau and phospho-tau (p-tau) in order to study their differential expression in frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 25) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA, n = 12) as compared to Alzheimer's dementia (AD, n = 25) and nondemented controls (n = 20). METHODS: Commercially available ELISA and electrochemiluminescence methods were applied. RESULTS: High CSF p-tau and low ratios of Aß(1-42)/Aß(1-40) and Aß(1-42)/Aß(1-38), respectively, were specific for AD. CSF Aß(1-38) was reduced in FTD as compared to each of the other diagnostic groups, including PPA. CSF tau and p-tau levels were elevated in PPA as compared to FTD. CONCLUSION: This is the first detailed report on biomarker patterns in PPA, indicating distinct CSF biomarker patterns in FTD and PPA as major subgroups of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The diagnostic and pathophysiological implications of our results warrant further studies on larger and neuropathologically diagnosed patient populations.