Risk of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol: A multicenter prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug safety during pregnancy.

To assess the risk of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol during pregnancy, we conducted a prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug use during pregnancy provided by the Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy and Toranomon Hospital. Counseling information, including drug usage and participants' demographic information, was collected between April 1988 and December 2017. Pregnancy outcome data, including major birth defects, were obtained using a questionnaire administered 1 month after delivery. The risks of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine (n = 588) and ambroxol (n = 341) were compared with those of nonteratogenic drug use during the first trimester (n = 1525). The adjusted odds ratio (aORs) for major birth defects was calculated using a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. The incidence of major birth defects was 1.2% (7/588) and 2.1% (7/341) in the carbocisteine and ambroxol groups, respectively, which was comparable to the control group (26/1525, 1.7%). Results of multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant risks for both carbocisteine (aOR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.1, p = 0.11) and ambroxol (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.18-7.2, p = 0.88). No specific major birth defects were reported in the carbocisteine or ambroxol groups. This study demonstrated that carbocisteine and ambroxol exposure during the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. These results could help in counseling for the use of these drugs during pregnancy and further alleviate anxiety in patients.

[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol versus a fixed-dose combination of bromhexine/guaifenesin/salbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis].

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol, oral solution, versus Ascoril Expectorant, syrup (combination of bromhexine, guaifenesin, and salbutamol) in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, randomized, phase III study included patients with acute bronchitis who had a productive cough with difficulty in sputum expectoration. 244 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and received 10 mL of the study drug or reference drug 3 times daily for 2 weeks. After 7 and 14 days of treatment, the physician evaluated patient's subjective complaints and the efficacy of therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with high and very high efficacy. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached by 70 (0.5738) patients in the study drug group and 54 (0.4426) in the reference drug group (p=0.04). The intergroup difference was 0.1311 [95% confidence interval: 0.0057; 0.2566]. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was above zero, which confirms the superiority of therapy with the study drug over therapy with Ascoril Expectorant. The proportion of patients with a 1-point total score reduction and with complete resolution of all symptoms according to the Modified Cough Relief and Sputum Expectoration Questionnaire after 7 and 14 days was numerically higher in the study drug group versus the reference drug group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of a new combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis is superior to the efficacy of Ascoril Expectorant. The safety profiles of the study drug and the reference drug were comparable.

Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Ambroxol Combined with Methylprednisolone in Patients with Acute Lung Injury.

BACKGROUND: There is no better treatment method towards paraquat-induced acute lung injury (ALI) at present. Ambroxol combined with methylprednisolone exhibits a significant improvement effect on ALI treatment, whereas their mechanism in ALI is still unclear. METHODS: 64 patients with ALI caused by paraquat poisoning brought to our hospital from January 2015 to January 2018 were selected. They were separated into a combined treatment group (CTG) and a routine treatment group (RTG) on the basis of different treatment methods. The survival of patients was observed after 7 days of treatment. Arterial blood gas, oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), patient's spontaneous respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were observed before and after treatment for 7 days. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were analyzed. The differences of indexes between the dead patients and the survivors were observed, and the potential predictive value of death was analyzed. RESULTS: After treatment, the indexes of patients were significantly improved in both groups compared with those before therapy. Further comparison showed that the improvement of PaO2, PaCO2, and PaO2/FiO2 in CTG was obviously higher than that in RTG (p < 0.05). The improvement of RR, PEEP, and VT in CTG was obviously higher than that in RTG (p < 0.05). The decreased degree of IL-6 and TNF-α in CTG was higher than that in RTG (p < 0.05). The 7-day mortality rate of 64 patients was 39.06%, and there was no obvious difference in the 7-day survival rate in both groups (p = 0.649). IL-6 and TNF-α were expected to be potential prediction indexes of paraquat-induced ALI. CONCLUSION: Ambroxol combined with methylprednisolone significantly improved the oxygen partial pressure and oxygenation index of patients with paraquat-induced ALI and inhibited the inflammatory response of patients.

Upgrading the evidence for the use of ambroxol in Gaucher disease and GBA related Parkinson: Investigator initiated registry based on real life data.

Ambroxol hydrochloride is an oral mucolytic drug available over-the-counter for many years as cough medicine. In 2009 it was identified as a pharmacological chaperone for mutant glucocerebrosidase, albeit in a several-fold higher dose. Unfortunately, there have been no pharma-driven clinical trials to establish its use. Thus, real-world observational data are needed on the safety and efficacy of ambroxol for patients with Gaucher disease (GD) and GBA-Parkinson disease (GBA-PD). Clinicians treating patients with ambroxol for GD and GBA-PD were approached to collaborate in an investigator-initiated registry. Anonymized data were collected, including demographics, GD type, GD-specific therapy (when applicable), adverse events (AEs), and, when available, efficacy data. We report the data of the first 41 patients (25 females) at a median (range) age 17 (1.5-74) from 13 centers; 11 with GD type 1(four diagnosed with PD), 27 with neuronopathic GD (nGD), and three GBA mutation carriers with PD. The median (range) treatment period and maximum dose of ambroxol were 19 (1-76) months and 435 (75-1485) mg/day, respectively. One patient with type 2 GD died of her disease. No other severe AEs were reported. Twelve patients experienced AE, including minor bowel discomfort, cough, allergic reaction, mild proteinuria, dizziness and disease progression. Clinical benefits were reported in 25 patients, including stable or improved neurological status, increased physical activity, and reduced fatigue. Until the approval of specific therapies for nGD and disease-modification for GBA-PD, these preliminary data may be encouraging to physicians and patients who consider an off-label use of ambroxol.

Safety of ambroxol in the treatment of airway diseases in adult patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ambroxol is a widely used secretolytic and mucoactive over-the-counter agent primarily used to treat respiratory diseases associated with viscid mucus. Following post-marketing reports of hypersensitivity reactions and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) possibly linked to ambroxol, the European Union's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) initiated in April 2014 a review of the safety of ambroxol in all its registered indications, which was finalized in 2016. Areas covered: Here, we evaluate the clinical safety of ambroxol and provide an expert opinion on the benefit-risk balance of ambroxol in the treatment of adult patients with bronchopulmonary diseases. The evidence for this review is derived from clinical trials of ambroxol that were provided to the PRAC by the marketing authorization holders of ambroxol-containing medicines. Expert opinion: Clinical experience accumulated from randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggests that ambroxol is a safe and well-tolerated treatment of bronchopulmonary diseases, with a well-balanced and favorable benefit-risk profile. All reported adverse events were mild and self-limiting, and the risk of SCARs with ambroxol is low. Further investigations could address the safety and efficacy of ambroxol in pediatric lung diseases and in additional therapeutic indications, such as biofilm-dependent airway disease and lysosomal storage disorders.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of salbutamol/ambroxol fixed-dose combination granules in healthy Chinese subjects
.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of salbutamol/ambroxol fixed-dose combination granules following single and multiple dosing in healthy Chinese subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, two-period, one-sequence study (n = 12). Each subject received a single oral dose in period 1 and multiple doses in period 2. Plasma concentrations of these two components were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Adverse events (AEs) were documented throughout the study. Investigators evaluated AEs in terms of frequency, duration, intensity, seriousness, outcome, and relationship to study drugs. RESULTS: Following single dosing, Cmax values were 8.07 ± 1.31 ng/mL and 25.7 ± 6.5 ng/mL for salbutamol and ambroxol, respectively. The corresponding T1/2 values were 8.15 ± 3.13 hours and 9.31 ± 2.27 hours, respectively. Moreover, no statistical differences in the pharmacokinetics of salbutamol and ambroxol in subjects receiving single or multiple dosage were observed. Single- and multiple-dose oral administration of fixed-dose combination granules were safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Drug hypersensitivity syndrome did not occur during our study. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of salbutamol and ambroxol in the fixed-dose combination granules were not affected by dosing duration, and gender differences seemed to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of salbutamol and ambroxol after a single dose and multiple doses of the medication.
.

Investigation of a potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol and bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination containing these two drugs in healthy Chinese subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between salbutamol and ambroxol, the bioequivalence of the new fixed-dose combination containing salbutamol and ambroxol compared with co-administration of the two separate formulations, and to describe the safety and tolerability of the fixed-dose combination formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, four-treatment, four-period crossover study for evaluation of drug-drug interaction and bioequivalence (n = 24) was performed. Each participant received salbutamol 4 mg, ambroxol 15 mg, salbutamol 4 mg co-administered with ambroxol 15 mg or fixed-dose combination formulation (salbutamol 4 mg and ambroxol 15 mg). Plasma concentrations of two analytes were determined with the use of validated LC-MS/MS method. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events. RESULTS: Co-administration of salbutamol and ambroxol was not associated with a significant influence on single salbutamol or ambroxol pharmacokinetics. After statistical comparisons of log-transformed Cmax and AUC of salbutamol and ambroxol between fixed-dose combination and concomitant treatments, all 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios were within the predefined equivalence range of 80 - 125%. No serious adverse events were reported, and all treatments were safe and well tolerated in Chinese healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: There were no significant drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions between salbutamol and ambroxol after oral administration. The new formulation was bioequivalent to the co-administration of two drugs in separate dosage forms.
.

Efficacy and Safety of Ambroxol Lozenges in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Sore Throat - a Pooled Analysis.

A pooled analysis is presented of 7 placebo-controlled RCT that investigated lozenges containing ambroxol for pain relief in acute sore throat.2 242 patients were treated with different ambroxol doses or control treatments, 2 183 were evaluable for efficacy. The present analysis is focused on the recommended dose of 20 mg (AXL20): 856 patients were treated with AXL20, 847 with matched placebo lozenges (PL).The average reduction in pain intensity over the first 3 h after the first AXL20 ranged from 38% to 52% of the maximum achievable effect (MAE). The overall treatment difference between AXL20 and PL was 11% (95% CI: 8-13%) of the MAE (post-hoc meta-analysis). The corresponding NNT was 6.0 (CI: 4.7-8.4) for an average pain reduction from baseline of 33% of the MAE over the first 3 h.71.9, 79.0, and 85.3% of the AXL20-patients scored the efficacy as "very good or good" at the end of the 1(st), 2(nd) and 3(rd) day, respectively, vs. 57.5, 64.4, and 70.4% of the PL-patients resulting in odds ratios of 1.9 (CI: 1.5-2.3) for the 1(st), 2.1 (CI: 1.7-2.6) for the 2(nd) and 2.43 (CI: 1.8-3.3) for the 3(rd) day.At the end of treatment 'no redness' or 'slightly red' was scored on pharyngeal inspection in 84.4% and 77.3% of AXL20- and PL-patients (OR: 1.6, CI: 1.3-1.9).AXL20-treatment was well tolerated and is safe and efficacious for acute uncomplicated sore throat of recent onset in adolescent and adult patients.

Bioequivalence assessment of ambroxol orally-disintegrating tablet after a single oral-dose administration to healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, a modified LC-MS/MS method was used to determine plasma ambroxol concentration and thereby examine the bioequivalence of two ambroxol medications among healthy Chinese male volunteers. METHODS: The study used a single-dose, randomized, open-label design principle and calculated pharmacokinetic parameters for the comparison of the two formulations. RESULTS: Administration of a single oral dose of either the test drug or reference drug was found to be safe in healthy subjects. No severe, serious, or life-threatening clinical or drug-related side effects were reported during the study. The majority of clinical laboratory test results were within the normal range or not clinically significant. The pharmacokinetic parameters for ambroxol oral tablets and ambroxol orally disintegrating tablets were comparable. For the comparison of the two formulations, the 90% confidence intervals for the log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf) fell within the bioequivalence< acceptance criteria (80-125%). CONCLUSIONS: The ambroxol oral tablets were bioequivalent to ambroxol orally-disintegrating tablets in healthy human adult male volunteers, under fasting conditions.

[Topical ambroxol for the treatment of neuropathic pain: A first clinical observation. German version]. / Topisches Ambroxol zur Behandlung neuropathischer Schmerzen: Eine erste klinische Beobachtung.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and available options are frequently not sufficient. The expectorant ambroxol also works as a strong local anesthetic and blocks sodium channels about 40 times more potently than lidocaine. Ambroxol preferentially inhibits the channel subtype Nav 1.8, which is expressed particularly in nociceptive C fibers. Due to the low toxicity, topical ambroxol seemed to represent a reasonable therapeutic attempt for treatment of neuropathic pain resistant to other standard options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 7 patients with severe neuropathic pain, in whom many attempts at treatment with approved substances were not sufficient or possible, are reported retrospectively. Patients were then treated with topical ambroxol 20% cream applied in the area of neuropathic pain. RESULTS: Causes of neuropathic pain were postherpetic neuralgia (2-×), mononeuropathy multiplex, phantom pain, deafferentation pain, postoperative neuralgia and an unclear allodynia of the foot. Mean pain intensity was reported as 4-6/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and maximum pain intensity as 6-10/10. Pain reduction following ambroxol cream was 2-8 points (NRS) within 15-30 min and lasted 3-8 h. Pain attacks were reduced in all 5 patients presenting this problem. Topical ambroxol achieved pain reduction in 4 patients with no improvement after lidocaine 5% and 1 patient with no response to capsaicin 8%. No adverse events or skin changes have been observed, and the longest treatment duration is currently 4 years. CONCLUSION: Ambroxol acts as a strong local anesthetic and preferentially inhibits the nociceptive-relevant sodium channel subtype Nav 1.8. For the first time, we report relevant pain reduction following topical Ambroxol 20% cream in patients with neuropathic pain. Regarding the advantageous profile with rare side effects, the clinical benefit for pain patients should be further investigated.

Acebrophylline-induced angioedema.

A 53-year-old woman visited her physician complaining of acute breathlessness and productive cough. Her medications included budesonide and formoterol for asthma, fixed-dose combination aspirin 150 mg + clopidogrel 75 mg + atorvastatin 20 mg for ischemic heart disease. History revealed that she had allergic rhinitis and was hypersensitive to penicillins. The patient was prescribed acebrophylline (ABP). Six hours after ABP therapy she presented with generalized urticarial lesions, swelling of hands, feet, lips and face, suggestive of angioedema. ABP was stopped immediately, and the patient was treated symptomatically. This case was categorized as probable as per standard causality assessment scale.

Efficacy and Safety of an Oral Ambroxol Spray in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Sore Throat.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy and tolerability of oral spray formulations delivering 2.5, 5, and 10 mg ambroxol (AXS) per application (4 actuations/application) in relieving acute sore throat vs. spraying a matched placebo solution. DESIGN: Multi-centre, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trial with up to 6 daily applications of the assigned medication for up to 3 days. PATIENTS: 511 outpatients with acute sore throat were enrolled, 494 were treated. TREATMENTS: Up to 6 spray applications per day as needed for up to 3 days. RESULTS: All treatments led to a reduction in pain intensity (PI); the mean cumulative PI-reductions over the first 2 h after the 1(st) dose (SPIDnorm(0-2)) were 24.7, 26.6, 26.0, and 32.2% (SEM: 0.023) of the predose PI for treatment with placebo, and the 2.5, 5, and 10 mg AXS, respectively. These mean reductions were 2 (CI: -3.6; 7.5), 1.3 (CI: -4.3; 6.8), and 7.5 (CI: 2.0;13.1) percent points larger than for placebo. The 2.5 and 5 mg AXS were not distinguishable from placebo, but the 10 mg AXS was evidently superior. The numbers needed to treat (NNT) when comparing 10 mg AXS with placebo, were 9.5 and 8.8 for an average pain relief of 33 and 50% of the maximum achievable effect over the first 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: 10 mg AXS showed a statistically significantly superior pain reduction relative to the placebo spray. Treatment with 10 mg AXS reaches an extent of pain relief that can be accepted to be clinically meaningful and was well tolerated.

Avoiding the prenatal programming effects of glucocorticoids: are there alternative treatments for the induction of antenatal lung maturation?

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of antenatal glucocorticoids (GCs) vary between reports, and have generated controversy in terms of repeated and single-course events, causing irreversible effects on endocrine set points. AIM: This study aimed to assess the effects of alternative therapeutic agents other than synthetic glucocorticoid GC administration for fetal lung maturation. METHODS: A review of literature from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted to assess the use of alternative therapies to synthetic GCs using recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). End points included the rates of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), mRNA expression for pneumocyte type II, concentration of surfactant proteins in alveolar lavage, morphological differences, histological proof of lung maturation, and angiogenesis or quantification of the surfactant pool. RESULTS: In all 41 studies examined, we found that ambroxol showed positive effects on lung maturation, but it has yet to be analyzed with sufficient significance in humans. Interleukins and TNF-alpha produce accelerated lung maturation, but have only been evaluated in basic research/experimental studies. Growth factors promote structural and functional growth in all phases of lung maturation, but little is known about their reciprocal effects and exact mechanisms as therapeutics. Thyroid releasing hormone or vitamin A cause detrimental side effects or were less effective for lung maturation. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of these alternative agents are differentiated and none up to now can be recommended as an alternative to GCs.

Ambroxol-induced focal epileptic seizure.

It is well known that in epileptic patients some compounds and different drugs used for the treatment of comorbidities can facilitate or provoke seizures, this evidence regarding a wide spectrum of pharmacological categories. The potential facilitating factors usually include direct toxic effects or pharmacological interactions of either active ingredients or excipients. We report the case of a patient with drug-resistant epilepsy who experienced focal epileptic seizures, easily and constantly reproducible, after each administration of a cough syrup. This is, to our knowledge, the first electroencephalogram-documented case of focal epileptic seizures induced by cough syrup containing ambroxol as active ingredient.

Ambroxol as a pharmacological chaperone for mutant glucocerebrosidase.

Gaucher disease (GD) is characterized by accumulation of glucosylceramide in lysosomes due to mutations in the GBA1 gene encoding the lysosomal hydrolase ß-glucocerebrosidase (GCase). The disease has a broad spectrum of phenotypes, which were divided into three different Types; Type 1 GD is not associated with primary neurological disease while Types 2 and 3 are associated with central nervous system disease. GCase molecules are synthesized on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-bound polyribosomes, translocated into the ER and following modifications and correct folding, shuttle to the lysosomes. Mutant GCase molecules, which fail to fold correctly, undergo ER associated degradation (ERAD) in the proteasomes, the degree of which is one of the factors that determine GD severity. Several pharmacological chaperones have already been shown to assist correct folding of mutant GCase molecules in the ER, thus facilitating their trafficking to the lysosomes. Ambroxol, a known expectorant, is one such chaperone. Here we show that ambroxol increases both the lysosomal fraction and the enzymatic activity of several mutant GCase variants in skin fibroblasts derived from Type 1 and Type 2 GD patients.

Pilot study using ambroxol as a pharmacological chaperone in type 1 Gaucher disease.

The purpose of this pilot was to assess the tolerability and efficacy of ambroxol as a pharmacological chaperone in patients with symptomatic, type 1 Gaucher disease who present with measurable disease parameters but are not receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in order to provide proof of concept and/or ascertain the suitability of ambroxol for a larger clinical trial. The Israeli Ministry of Health Form 29c was employed to prescribe ambroxol for off-label use. Twelve patients were dispensed 2 capsules of 75 mg of ambroxol daily for 6 months. There were 8 females (66.7%). Mean age at entry was 41.1 (range: 24-63) years. Mean body weight at entry was 66.4 (range: 46.5-100) kg. One patient withdrew because of a hypersensitivity reaction, one because of elective splenectomy. No patient experienced clinically relevant deterioration in disease parameters measured. One patient achieved a robust response relative to baseline: +16.2% hemoglobin; +32.9% platelets; -2.8% liver volume; and -14.4% spleen volume. Three patients, including the above one, elected to continue on ambroxol for a further 6 months: hemoglobin levels and liver volumes were relatively stable, but platelet counts further increased in the above patient (+52.6% from baseline) and spleen volumes decreased further in all three patients (-6.4%, -18.6%, and -23.4% from baseline). Thus, ambroxol may be a safe option for Gaucher disease patients with potential disease-specific efficacy and should be expanded into a clinical trial using higher doses and placebo-controlled design.

Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: a single blind clinical study of N-acetylcysteine vs ambroxol associated to corticosteroid therapy.

The aim of rhinosinusitis treatment is to restore sinusal eutrophism and to normalize ventilation and mucociliary transport. Frequently the improvement of sinusal physiological conditions is associated with a reduction of infections and pulmonary symptoms. The treatment of these diseases often requires the combination of medical and surgical strategies. In particular, the aim of the medical therapy is multiple: to treat the infection (with antibiotics), to reduce the mucosal swelling (with corticosteroids) and to improve mucus drainage (with mucolytics or muco-regulators). The use of atomized nasal douche, as a washing of the nasal fossas, is chosen because of its local action minimizing systemic adverse effects. The surgical treatment is secondary to medical failure, and it is focused on clearing the sinusal ostia in the sphenoethmoidal recess and the osteomeatal complex. In case of recurrent sinonasal diseases the importance of the surgical operation is represented by the fact that the medical treatment better reaches the target in the sinusal space. This study is focused on the primary medical treatment of acute recurrent rhinosinusitis. The patients who immediately needed surgical treatment were excluded from the study (because of the presence of an anatomical obstruction of the osteomeatal complex and/or the sphenoethmoidal recess, hence non-susceptible to improvement by medical therapy alone), and these patients were immediately addressed to undergo a CT scan examination in order to be involved in a future surgical programme. The medical treatment for those forms which do not require antibiotics (i.e. when infections are not involved), is based on the use of topical corticosteroids. While there are controversies on the real efficacy of adding mucolytic agents to the steroids, they are commonly prescribed in clinical practice, with the rationale of reducing viscosity and improving clearance of mucus in order to help the restoration of the physiological sinus conditions. The primary aim of the medical treatment is to reduce the number of acute episodes and thus to increase the time between the exacerbations, allowing a good quality of life without necessitating surgical procedure.

The protective effects of ambroxol on radiation lung injury and influence on production of transforming growth factor beta1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha.

The aim of this article was to investigate the effect of ambroxol on radiation lung injury and the expression of transforming growth factor beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)), as well as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in plasma. Totally, 120 patients with locally advanced lung cancer in radiotherapy were randomized into treatment and control groups. Patients in the treatment group took ambroxol orally at a dosage of 90 mg, three times per day for 3 months from the beginning of radiotherapy. The expression of TGF-beta(1) and TNF-alpha in plasma was analyzed. The clinical symptoms and lung diffusing capacity were monitored using high resolving power computed tomography. The level of TGF-beta(1) in the control group was increased (11.8 +/- 5.5 ng/ml), whereas in ambroxol-treated patients, the increase was not significant (5.6 +/- 2.6 ng/ml, P < 0.001). Radiotherapy-induced elevation of TNF-alpha levels, seen in control patients, was also abolished after treatment with ambroxol (5.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.8 ng/ml, P < 0.001). In the treatment group, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity was not significantly decreased at 6, 12, and 18 months post-radiotherapy, compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Ambroxol decreased the expression of TGF-beta(1) and TNF-alpha, and minimized the diminishment of lung diffusion capacity after radiotherapy.