An urgent need for community lot testing of lateral flow fentanyl test strips marketed for harm reduction in Northern America.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are lateral flow immunoassay strips designed for detection of ng/mL levels of fentanyl in urine. In 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration stated that federal funds could be used for procurement of FTS for harm reduction strategies approved by the government such as drug checking. The market for FTS has expanded rapidly in the US and Canada. However, there is no regulatory oversight by either government to ensure proper function of FTS that are being marketed for drug checking. MAIN BODY: Many brands of FTS have rapidly entered the harm reduction market, creating concerns about the reproducibility and accuracy of their performance from brand to brand and lot to lot. Some examples are provided in this Comment. Similar problems with product quality were observed in the mid 2000's when lateral flow immunoassays for malaria were funded in many countries and again in 2020, when COVID-19 tests were in huge demand. The combination of high demand and low levels of regulation and enforcement led some manufacturers to join the goldrush without adequate field testing or quality assurance. We argue that the harm reduction community urgently needs to set a lot checking program in place. A set of simple protocols for conducting the tests and communicating the results have been developed, and are described in the following Perspectives paper in this issue. CONCLUSION: In the absence of governmental regulation and enforcement, the harm reduction community should implement a FTS lot checking program. Based on previous experience with the malaria diagnostic lot checking program, this inexpensive effort could identify products that are not suitable for harm reduction applications and provide valuable feedback to manufacturers. Dissemination of the results will help harm reduction organizations to ensure that FTS they use for drug checking are fit for the purpose.

Comprehensive overview of analytical and bioanalytical methodologies for the opioid analgesics - Tramadol and combinations.

Synthetic opioids like Tramadol are used to treat mild to moderate pain. Its ability to relieve pain is about a tenth that of morphine. Furthermore, Tramadol shares similar effects on serotonin and norepinephrine to several antidepressants known as serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine and duloxetine. The present review paper discusses the recent developments in analytical methods for identifying drugs in pharmaceutical preparations and toxicological materials, such as blood, saliva, urine, and hair. In recent years, a wide variety of analytical instruments, including capillary electrophoresis, NMR, UV-visible spectroscopy, HPTLC, HPLC, LC-MS, GC, GC-MS, and electrochemical sensors, have been used for drug identification in pharmaceutical preparations and toxicological samples. The primary quantification techniques currently employed for its quantification in various matrices are highlighted in this research.

Tackling new psychoactive substances through metabolomics: UHPLC-HRMS study on natural and synthetic opioids in male and female murine models.

Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) represent a broad class of drugs new to the illicit market that often allow passing drug-screening tests. They are characterized by a variety of structures, rapid transience on the drug scene and mostly unknown metabolic profiles, thus creating an ever-changing scenario with evolving analytical targets. The present study aims at developing an indirect screening strategy for NPS monitoring, and specifically for new synthetic opioids (NSOs), based on assessing changes in endogenous urinary metabolite levels as a consequence of the systemic response following their intake. The experimental design involved in-vivo mice models: 16 animals of both sex received a single administration of morphine or fentanyl. Urine was collected before and after administration at different time points; the samples were then analysed with an untargeted metabolomics LC-HRMS workflow. According to our results, the intake of opioids resulted in an elevated energy demand, that was more pronounced on male animals, as evidenced by the increase in medium and long chain acylcarnitines levels. It was also shown that opioid administration disrupted the pathways related to catecholamines biosynthesis. The observed alterations were common to both morphine and fentanyl: this evidence indicate that they are not related to the chemical structure of the drug, but rather on the drug class. The proposed strategy may reinforce existing NPS screening approaches, by identifying indirect markers of drug assumption.

Human metabolism of four synthetic benzimidazole opioids: isotonitazene, metonitazene, etodesnitazene, and metodesnitazene.

Following isotonitazene scheduling in 2019, the availability of alternative 2-benzylbenzimidazole opioids (nitazenes) on the global drug market increased, resulting in many fatalities worldwide. Nitazenes are potent µ-opioid receptor agonists with strong narcotic/analgesic effects, and their concentrations in biological matrices are low, making the detection of metabolite biomarkers of consumption crucial to document use in clinical and forensic settings. However, there is little to no data on the metabolism of the most recently available nitazenes, especially desnitro-analogues. The aim of the research was to assess isotonitazene, metonitazene, etodesnitazene, and metodesnitazene human metabolism and identify specific metabolite biomarkers of consumption. The four analogues were incubated with 10-donor-pooled human hepatocytes, and the incubates were analyzed by liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry and data mining with Compound Discoverer (Thermo Scientific); the analysis was supported by in silico metabolite predictions with GLORYx open-access software. Metabolites were identified in postmortem blood and/or urine samples from two metonitazene-positive and three etodesnitazene-positive cases following the same workflow, with and without glucuronide hydrolysis in urine, to confirm in vitro results. Twelve, nine, twenty-two, and ten metabolites were identified for isotonitazene, metonitazene, etodesnitazene, and metodesnitazene, respectively. The main transformations were N-deethylation at the N,N-diethylethanamine side chain, O-dealkylation, and further O-glucuronidation. In vitro and autopsy results were consistent, demonstrating the efficacy of the 10-donor-pooled human hepatocyte model to predict human metabolism. We suggest the parent and the corresponding O-dealkyl- and N-deethyl-O-dealkyl metabolites as biomarkers of exposure in urine after glucuronide hydrolysis, and the corresponding N-deethyl metabolite as additional biomarker in blood.

Clinician Ordering and Management Patterns of Urine Toxicology Results at a Cancer Center.

CONTEXT: Opioid therapy is a cornerstone for treatment of cancer-related pain, but standardized management practices for patients with cancer and aberrant urine drug test (UDT) results are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To identify the prevalence of UDT ordering (both screening and definitive testing) in the oncology setting and to examine clinician management practices for patients with cancer on opioid therapy with aberrant definitive UDT results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with cancer on opioid therapy at an academic cancer center in the United States. Outcomes included UDT ordering patterns and clinician management practices in response to aberrant definitive UDT results. RESULTS: Our study revealed an overall UDT ordering rate of 3.7% among 10,371 patients with cancer on opioid therapy. Among 143 patients for whom definitive UDTs were ordered, oncologists only ordered 14 (9.8%) UDTs, while palliative care ordered the majority (n = 129; 90.2%). Fifty-five (38.5%) patients had aberrant results, and the most common aberrancy was presence of illicit drugs 22 [15.4%]. Clinicians rarely made medication changes (20 [36.4%]) when UDT results were aberrant, and in the setting of possible fentanyl use (n = 8), only 3 (37.5%) patients were started/switched to methadone, and none were started/switched to buprenorphine. CONCLUSION: Overall UDT ordering was infrequent for patients with cancer on opioid therapy, especially by oncologists, and clinicians rarely made prescribing changes when definitive UDT results were aberrant. More definitive guidance related to UDT ordering and opioid management are needed for patients with cancer and aberrant UDT results.

Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry with On-Paper Electrokinetic Manipulations: Part-Per-Trillion Detection of Per/Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water and Opioids in Urine.

We developed a simple, paper-based device that enables sensitive detection by mass spectrometry (MS) without solid phase extraction or other sample preparation. Using glass fiber filter papers within a 3D printed holder, the device employs electrokinetic manipulations to stack, separate, and desalt charged molecules on paper prior to spray into the MS. Due to counter-balanced electroosmotic flow and electrophoresis, charged analytes stack on the paper and desalting occurs in minutes. One end of the paper strip was cut into a sharp point and positioned near the inlet of a MS. The stacked analyte bands move toward the paper tip with the EOF where they are ionized by paper spray. The device was applied to analysis of PFAS in tap water with sub part-per-trillion detection limits in less than ten minutes with no sample pretreatment. Analysis of opioids in urine also occurs in minutes. The crucial parameters to enable stacking, separation, and MS ionization of both positively and negatively charged analytes were determined and optimized. Experimental and computational modeling studies confirm the electrokinetic stacking and analyte transport mechanisms. On-paper separations were carried out by stacking analyte bands at different locations depending on their electrophoretic mobility, achieving baseline separation in some cases.

Prevalence of abnormal urine drug tests during COVID-19 pandemic in the cancer patient population: retrospective study.

Background: Opioid misuse is a persistent concern, heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the risk factors contributing to elevated rates of abnormal urine drug tests (UDTs) in the cancer pain patient population during COVID-19. Materials & methods: A retrospective chart review of 500 patient encounters involving UDTs at a comprehensive cancer center. Results: Medication adherence rates increase when UDTs are incorporated into a chronic cancer pain management protocol. Higher positive tests for illicit or nonprescribed substances in patients with specific risk factors: current smokers (tobacco), no active cancer and concurrent benzodiazepine use. Conclusion: This research emphasizes the increased risk of opioid misuse during COVID-19 among cancer pain patients with specific risk factors outlined in the results.

This study looked at how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected opioid use among people with cancer-related pain. The researchers checked the records of 500 patients who had had tests to see if they used opioids correctly. They found that when these tests were part of the treatment plan, patients were more likely to take their medicines correctly. However, they also noticed that certain patients, such as those who smoke, do not have active cancer or are taking another type of medication (i.e., benzodiazepines), are more likely to use opioids or other drugs in ways that deviated from the original intention. This study shows that during the pandemic, which continues to exist, it is even more important to watch how these patients use their painkillers and help them avoid misuse.

In vitro, in vivo metabolism and quantification of the novel synthetic opioid N-piperidinyl etonitazene (etonitazepipne).

OBJECTIVES: N-piperidinyl etonitazene (etonitazepipne) is a newly synthesized opioid related to the 2-benzylbenzimidazole analog class. Etonitazepipne has been formally notified and placed under intensive monitoring in Europe in January 2022. Nitazenes have high affinity at µ-opioid receptor (MOR). Etonitazepipne, specifically shows a EC50 of 2.49 nM, suggesting about 50 times higher potency combined with higher efficacy compared to morphine. Antinociceptive potency l ('hot plate test' with rats) was 192-fold greater than that of morphine. METHODS: Here we report on a post-mortem case involving etonitazepipne and its quantification using a standard addition method (SAM) through liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In addition, characterization and identification of phase I human metabolites using in vitro assay based on pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM) was performed along with the analysis of authentic urine samples by means of high-performance liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). RESULTS: The concentration of etonitazepipne in post-mortem blood and urine was 8.3 and 11 ng/mL, respectively. SAM was validated by assessing the following parameters: intraday and interday repeatability, matrix effect and recovery rate in post-mortem blood. A total of 20 and 14 metabolites were identified after pHLM incubation and urine analysis, respectively. Most pronounced in vitro and in vivo transformations were O-deethylation, hydroxylation, ketone reduction, and combinations thereof. CONCLUSIONS: Considering small traces of the parent drug often found in real cases, the identification of metabolic biomarkers is crucial to identify exposure to this drug. O-deethylated, oxidated metabolites, and combination thereof are proposed as urinary biomarkers along with the parent compound.

N-desethyl isotonitazene detected in polydrug users admitted to hospital in Birmingham, United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Nitazenes are potent synthetic opioids and N-desethyl isotonitazene, a metabolite of isotonitazene, has emerged as a drug in its own right. METHODS: This is an observational case series of patients with suspected or declared substance use who were admitted to hospitals in the Sandwell and West Birmingham National Health Service Trust between July and October 2023. All patients were found on toxicological screening to have been exposed to N-desethyl isotonitazene. RESULTS: Twenty presentations involving 19 patients who tested positive for N-desethyl isotonitazene were included in the study. In 19 presentations, multiple substances were detected on toxicological screening. The number of patients testing positive for other substances were: 19 for cocaine and its main metabolite benzoylecgonine, 13 for morphine, 11 for the heroin-specific metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine, ten for xylazine, eight for gabapentinoids (pregabalin and/or gabapentin), seven for methadone and/or the metabolite, 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine, six for benzodiazepines and five for the synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-4en-PINACA. Only one patient had no other substances detected apart from N-desethyl isotonitazene. This patient presented with coma, miosis, bradypnoea and hypercapnia and responded to naloxone. In this cohort, the median concentration of N-desethyl isotonitazene was 1.53 µg/L (n = 14; range 0.59-5.48) in whole blood and 27.75 µg/L (n = 16; range 0.51-91.53) in urine. DISCUSSION: The majority of the patients in this cohort presented with features typical of an opioid overdose, which is unsurprising as they were all experienced users of diamorphine. Although these features are also consistent with the known effects of N-desethyl isotonitazene, in only one case is it possible to attribute the patient's features to N-desethyl isotonitazene toxicity alone. CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights the need for toxicovigilance in the illicit drug market as patterns of substance misuse evolve and novel psychoactive substances continue to emerge.

Stimulant use and opioid-related harm in patients on long-term opioids for chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of clarity regarding the impact of and optimal clinical response to stimulant use among people prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a positive urine drug test (UDT) for stimulants was associated with subsequent opioid-related harm or discontinuation of LTOT. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: People living with and without HIV living in a major metropolitan area with public insurance, prescribed LTOT for chronic, non-cancer pain (n=600). MAIN MEASURES: UDT results from January 2012 to June 2019 were evaluated against 1) opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits (oversedation, constipation, infections associated with injecting opioids, and opioid seeking) or death in each 90-day period following a UDT, using logistic regression, and 2) LTOT discontinuation. RESULTS: There were no opioid overdose deaths within 90 days following a stimulant-positive UDT. A stimulant-positive UDT was not statistically significantly associated with opioid-related ED visits within 90 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39; 95% CI=0.88-2.21). Stimulant-positive UDT was independently associated with subsequent discontinuation of LTOT within 90 days (aOR 2.96; 95% CI=2.13 - 4.12). Living with HIV was independently associated with decreased odds of LTOT discontinuation (aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43 - 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Despite no association between a stimulant-positive UDT and subsequent opioid-related harm, there was an association with subsequent LTOT discontinuation, with heterogeneity across clinical groups. Detection of stimulant use should result in a discussion of substance use and risk, rather than reflex LTOT discontinuation.

Advances in fentanyl testing.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was approved by the FDA in the late 1960s. In the decades since, non-prescription use of fentanyl, its analogs, and structurally unrelated novel synthetic opioids (NSO) has become a worsening public health crisis. There is a clear need for accessible testing for these substances in biological specimens and in apprehended drugs. Immunoassays for fentanyl in urine are available but their performance is restricted to facilities that hold moderate complexity laboratory licenses. Immunoassays for other matrices such as oral fluid (OF), blood, and meconium have been developed but are not widely available. Point of care tests (POCT), such as lateral flow immunoassays or fentanyl test strips (FTS), are widely available but not approved by the FDA for clinical use. All immunoassays are vulnerable to false positive and false negative results. Immunoassays may or may not be able to detect fentanyl analogs and NSOs. Mass spectrometry (MS) can accurately and reliably measure fentanyl and its major metabolite norfentanyl in urine and oral fluid. MS is available at reference laboratories and large hospitals. Liquid chromatography paired with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the most widely used method and has outstanding specificity and sensitivity for fentanyl and norfentanyl. When compared to immunoassays, MS is more expensive, requires more technical skill, and takes longer to result. Newer mass spectrometry methods can measure fentanyl analogs and NSO. Both mass spectrometry assays and immunoassays [in the form of fentanyl test strips (FTS)] have potential use in harm reduction programs.

Technology-Assisted Buprenorphine Treatment in Rural and Nonrural Settings: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Expansion of opioid use disorder treatment is needed, particularly in rural communities. Objective: To evaluate technology-assisted buprenorphine (TAB) efficacy (1) over a longer period than previously examined, (2) with the addition of overdose education, and (3) among individuals residing in rural communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two parallel, 24-week randomized clinical trials were conducted at the University of Vermont between February 1, 2018, and June 30, 2022. Participants were adults with untreated opioid use disorder from nonrural (trial 1) or rural (trial 2) communities. These trials are part of a programmatic effort to develop TAB protocols to improve treatment availability in underserved areas. Interventions: Within each trial, 50 participants were randomized to TAB or control conditions. Participants in the TAB group completed bimonthly visits to ingest medication and receive take-home doses via a computerized device. They received nightly calls via an interactive voice response (IVR) system, IVR-generated random call-backs, and iPad-delivered HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and overdose education. Control participants received community resource guides and assistance with contacting resources. All participants received harm reduction supplies and completed monthly assessments. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was biochemically verified illicit opioid abstinence across monthly assessments. Secondary outcomes included self-reported opioid use in both groups and abstinence at bimonthly and random call-back visits, treatment adherence, satisfaction, and changes in HIV, HCV, and overdose knowledge among TAB participants. Results: Fifty individuals (mean [SD] age, 40.6 [13.1] years; 28 [56.0%] male) participated in trial 1, and 50 (mean [SD] age, 40.3 [10.8] years; 30 [60.0%] male) participated in trial 2. Participants in the TAB group achieved significantly greater illicit opioid abstinence vs controls at all time points in both trial 1 (85.3% [128 of 150]; 95% CI, 70.7%-93.3%; vs 24.0% [36 of 150]; 95% CI, 13.6%-38.8%) and trial 2 (88.0% [132 of 150]; 95% CI, 72.1%-95.4%; vs 21.3% [32 of 150]; 95% CI, 11.4%-36.5%). High abstinence rates were also observed at TAB participants' bimonthly dosing visits (83.0% [95% CI, 67.0%-92.0%] for trial 1 and 88.0% [95% CI, 71.0%-95.0%] for trial 2). Treatment adherence was favorable and similar between trials (with rates of approximately 99% for buprenorphine administration, 93% for daily IVR calls, and 92% for random call-backs), and 183 of 187 urine samples (97.9%) tested negative for illicit opioids at random call-backs. iPad-delivered education was associated with significant and sustained increases in HIV, HCV, and overdose knowledge. Conclusions and Relevance: In these randomized clinical trials of TAB treatment, demonstration of efficacy was extended to a longer duration than previously examined and to patients residing in rural communities. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03420313.

Association of Urine Fentanyl Concentration With Severity of Opioid Withdrawal Among Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fentanyl is involved in most US drug overdose deaths and its use can complicate opioid withdrawal management. Clinical applications of quantitative urine fentanyl testing have not been demonstrated previously. The aim of this study was to determine whether urine fentanyl concentration is associated with severity of opioid withdrawal. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study was conducted in 3 emergency departments in an urban, academic health system from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. PARTICIPANTS: This study included patients with opioid use disorder, detectable urine fentanyl or norfentanyl, and Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) recorded within 6 hours of urine drug testing. MEASUREMENTS: The primary exposure was urine fentanyl concentration stratified as high (>400 ng/mL), medium (40-399 ng/mL), or low (<40 ng/mL). The primary outcome was opioid withdrawal severity measured with COWS within 6 hours before or after urine specimen collection. We used a generalized linear model with γ distribution and log-link function to estimate the adjusted association between COWS and the exposures. FINDINGS: For the 1127 patients in our sample, the mean age (SD) was 40.0 (10.7), 384 (34.1%) identified as female, 332 (29.5%) reported their race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic Black, and 658 (58.4%) reported their race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic White. For patients with high urine fentanyl concentrations, the adjusted mean COWS (95% confidence interval) was 4.4 (3.9-4.8) compared with 5.5 (5.1-6.0) among those with medium and 7.7 (6.8-8.7) among those with low fentanyl concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Lower urine fentanyl concentration was associated with more severe opioid withdrawal, suggesting potential clinical applications for quantitative urine measurements in evolving approaches to fentanyl withdrawal management.

Urine Drug Testing Among Patients Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy: Patient and Clinician Factors.

INTRODUCTION: National guidelines recommend that patients with chronic noncancer pain prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) undergo periodic urine drug testing (UDT), yet UDT is performed inconsistently, and little evidence supports the utility of this approach. We examined patient and prescriber factors associated with UDT. METHODS: A 1-year retrospective cohort study of 5690 patients prescribed LTOT by 689 clinicians in a network of 13 primary care and specialty clinics. Negative binomial regression examined patient and prescriber factors associated with the number of tests completed, and logistic regression examined prescriber and practice level testing likelihood. Analyses were adjusted for patient and clinician characteristics and accounted for patient clustering within prescribers. RESULTS: A total of 2256 patients (39.6%) had UDT completed at least once. More UDT completion was associated with Black patient race and receipt of more opioid prescriptions, as well as with clinician testing compliance. CONCLUSIONS: UDT was relatively infrequent in patients prescribed LTOT and associated with patient factors not known to confer greater opioid-related risk, such as race. In addition, there was significant clinician-driven variation in UDT. Given the uncertain clinical utility of such testing, these findings signal the need for strategies to address potential biases in the use of UDT.

Detection of 58 fentanyl analogs using ARK fentanyl II and Immunalysis fentanyl immunoassays.

OBJECTIVES: The ability to detect fentanyl analogs in urine aids in patient management. Little is published about the new ARK™ Fentanyl II Assay formulation's ability to detect fentanyl analogs. Norfentanyl (fentanyl metabolite) cross-reactivity with the ARK II assays is 7%, while the Immunalysis SEFRIA assay norfentanyl cross-reactivity is approximately 0.005%. The purpose of this study was to determine the new ARK II and SEFRIA fentanyl assays' detection of 58 fentanyl analogs. DESIGN & METHODS: Drug-free urine was fortified with 0-100 ng/mL (0-0.297 µmol/L) of the fentanyl analog and analyzed using the previously evaluated immunoassays. Results were compared to molecular structure. Of the 58 analogs tested at ≤ 100 ng/mL (0-0.297 µmol/L), the ARK II and SEFRIA assays produced 51 and 57 positive results respectively. The cross-reactivity of the assay was predominantly determined by the location of the modification. Most modifications to the aniline ring and/or amide group did not affect the ARK II or SEFRIA assay. Modifications to the piperidine ring decreased detection by ARK II assay. Of the 7 compounds which were undetected by the ARK II assay, all had modifications to the N-alkyl chain. Norsufentanil was not detected by either assay and was the only analog not detected by the SEFRIA assay. CONCLUSIONS: The ARK II and Immunalysis fentanyl immunoassays can detect a range of fentanyl analogs with acryl, butyryl, or furanyl modifications to the amide group or aniline ring of the molecule. N-alkyl chain and piperidine ring modifications significantly affect the ARK II assay's ability to detect the analogs, while the SEFRIA assay appeared less affected and detected all analogs tested except for norsufentanil, which was also not detected by the ARK II assay.

Novel Receptor-Binding-Based Assay for the Detection of Opioids in Human Urine Samples.

Consumption of opioids is a growing global health problem. The gold standard for drugs of abuse screening is immunochemical assays. However, this method comes with some disadvantages when screening for a wide variety of opioids. Detection of the binding of a compound at the human µ-opioid receptor (MOR) offers a promising alternative target. Here, we set up a urine assay to allow for detection of compounds that bind at the MOR, thus allowing the assay to be utilized as a screening tool for opioid intake. The assay is based on the incubation of MOR-containing cell membranes with the selective MOR-ligand DAMGO and urine. After filtration, the amount of DAMGO in the eluate is analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS). The absence of DAMGO in the eluate corresponds to a competing MOR ligand in the urine sample, thus indicating opiate/opioid intake by the suspect. Sensitivity and specificity were determined by the analysis of 200 consecutive forensic routine casework urine samples. A pronounced displacement of DAMGO was observed in 29 of the 35 opiate/opioid-positive samples. Detection of fentanyl intake proved to be the most challenging aspect. Applying a cut-off value of, e.g., 10% DAMGO binding would lead to a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 95%. Consequently, the novel assay proved to be a promising screening tool for opiate/opioid presence in urine samples. The nontargeted approach and possible automation of the assay make it a promising alternative to conventional methods.

Urinary Pharmacokinetics of Immediate and Controlled Release Oxycodone and its Phase I and II Metabolites Using LC-MS-MS.

Oxycodone (OC) is a schedule II semisynthetic opioid in the USA that is prescribed for its analgesic effects and has a high potential for abuse. Prescriptions for OC vary based on the dosage and formulation, immediate release (IR) and controlled release (CR). Monitoring OC metabolites is beneficial for forensic casework. The limited studies that involve pharmacokinetics of the urinary excretion of OC metabolites leave a knowledge gap regarding the excretion of conjugated and minor metabolites, pharmacokinetic differences by formulation, and the impact of CYP2D6 activity on the metabolism and excretion of OC. The objectives of this study were to compare urinary excretion of phase I and II metabolites by formulation and investigate if ratio changes over time could be used to predict the time of intake. Subjects (n = 7) received a single 10 mg IR tablet of Oxycodone Actavis. A few weeks later the same subjects received a single 10 mg CR tablet of Oxycodone Actavis. During each setting, urine was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 24, 48 and 72 h. Urine samples (100 µL) were diluted with 900 µL internal standard mixture and analyzed on an Acquity UPLC® I-class coupled to a Waters Xevo TQD using a previously validated method. The CYP2D6 phenotypes were categorized as poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM) and ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). Comparisons between IR and CR were performed using two-tailed paired t-test at a significance level of P = 0.05. The metabolite ratios showed a general increase over time. Four metabolite to parent ratios were used to predict the time of intake showing that predictions were best at the early time points.

Predictors of the Rate of Illicit Fentanyl Metabolism in a Cohort of Pregnant Individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Illicit fentanyl use is growing in the United States, including among pregnant persons. Despite the prevalence of illicit fentanyl in the drug supply, the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl remains understudied, especially for pregnant individuals. The variability of fentanyl pharmacokinetics influences detection of fentanyl in urine samples, the results of which can have significant legal consequences. For pregnant and parenting individuals, these legal consequences may include termination of parental rights. METHODS: Through this medical-legal lens, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the electronic medical records of women receiving integrated prenatal care and substance use disorder treatment. A total of 420 medical records were reviewed and 112 individuals who had a positive fentanyl immunoassay and met the selection criteria were included. Metabolic ratios (level of norfentanyl/level of fentanyl) were calculated for each study individual. A linear regression analysis was used to determine if the following physiologic factors were predictors of the rate of fentanyl metabolism: hepatic function, renal function, body mass index, medication dosage, gestational age, and maternal age. RESULTS: Results indicated that advanced maternal age predicted a slower conversion of fentanyl to norfentanyl, whereas increased gestational age predicted a faster conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in fentanyl metabolism in pregnancy highlight the importance of clinician vigilance when interpreting fentanyl rests results, especially for individuals with advancing maternal age. In such cases, clinician caution and advocacy may prevent unwarranted and unjust removal of a child from maternal custody.

Rates and types of urine drug screen false negative results compared with confirmatory toxicology testing in major trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers are required to screen patients for alcohol use, and if necessary, intervene and refer to treatment (SBIRT). Similar screening for illicit drug use is recommended but not required. Urine drug screening (UDS) underestimates problematic substance use. This study aimed to estimate the types and rates of UDS false negatives (FN) compared to comprehensive testing by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of deidentified urine samples from adult trauma and burn activation patients. Both UDS and LC-MS comprehensive testing of >200 analytes were performed by a reference laboratory on all samples. Iatrogenic medications were excluded from the FN count. Crosstab analyses were conducted for UDS versus LC-MS outcomes to establish FN types and rates. We dichotomized the results by creating an "intentionality" variable (intentional injuries by self/others versus accidental injuries). A series of crosstabs with odds ratios considered intentionality by substance class and demographics. Statistically significant variables by Chi-Square were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Psychoactive FN were detected in 56/100 urine samples analyzed; the most frequent included anticonvulsants (primarily gabapentin, N = 13), opioid agonists (N = 12), antihistamines (primarily diphenhydramine, N = 10), and phenethylamines (primarily bupropion, N = 5). Nonpsychoactive FN were detected in 70/100 samples; the most common were nicotine (N = 33), caffeine (N = 23), acetaminophen (N = 22), and antidepressants (N = 12). Of substance classes included in the UDS and also tested by LC-MS, FN occurred for opiates (3%), amphetamines (5%) and opioids (25%). Polypharmacy was associated with fall injuries in elderly patients. Cocaine (p = 0.015) and cannabinoids (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with intentionality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that FN for potentially important psychoactive and nonpsychoactive substances are common when toxicologic testing is limited to routine UDS in trauma patients. We recommend expanding SBIRT in this patient population to include misuse of tobacco products, prescription analgesics, and over-the-counter antihistamines.

A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial to Decrease Prescription Opioid Misuse: Improving the Safety of Opioid Therapy (ISOT).

BACKGROUND: Interventions to reduce harms related to prescription opioids are needed in primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention, Improving the safety of opioid therapy (ISOT), is efficacious in reducing prescription opioid harms. DESIGN: Clinician-level, cluster randomized clinical trial. ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02791399) SETTING: Eight primary care clinics at 1 Veterans Affairs health care system. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five primary care clinicians and 286 patients who were prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). INTERVENTION: All clinicians participated in a 2-hour educational session on patient-centered care surrounding opioid adherence monitoring and were randomly assigned to education only or ISOT. ISOT is a multicomponent intervention that included a one-time consultation by an external clinician to the patient with monitoring and feedback to clinicians over 12 months. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcomes were changes in risk for prescription opioid misuse (Current Opioid Misuse Measure) and urine drug test results. Secondary outcomes were quality of the clinician-patient relationship, other prescription opioid safety outcomes, changes in clinicians' opioid prescribing characteristics, and a non-inferiority analysis of changes in pain intensity and functioning. KEY RESULTS: ISOT did not decrease risk for prescription opioid misuse (difference between groups = -1.12, p = 0.097), likelihood of an aberrant urine drug test result (difference between groups = -0.04, p=0.401), or measures of the clinician-patient relationship. Participants allocated to ISOT were more likely to discontinue prescription opioids (20.0% versus 8.1%, p = 0.007). ISOT did not worsen participant-reported scores of pain intensity or function. CONCLUSIONS: ISOT did not impact risk for prescription opioid misuse but did lead to increased likelihood of prescription opioid discontinuation. More intensive interventions may be needed to impact treatment outcomes.