Local Anesthetics delivered through Pleural Drainages improve Pain and Lung Function after Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Pleural tubes after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery usually cause pain resulting interalia in an impact of postoperative breathing. Therefore, the influence of intrapleural lidocaine application through special double-lumen chest tubes with respect to pain relief and lung function was investigated and compared with placebo. METHODS: In this study, 40 patients who underwent CABG got intrapleural injection either with 2% lidocaine (n = 20) or placebo (0.9% saline solution) (n = 20) on the first 2 days after surgery. Pain was measured by pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain; 10 = the most intense pain) and lung function by portable spirometer. RESULTS: On the first postoperative day (POD1), mean pain reduction was NRS 1.9 for the lidocaine group with an improvement of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 0.51 L. Similar results were shown on the second postoperative day (POD2) with a decreased pain level of mean NRS 1.65 and an FEV1 improvement of 0.26 L. In comparison, results of the placebo group showed no significant pain reduction, neither on the POD1 (NRS 0.35; p = 0.429) nor on the POD2 (NRS 0.55; p = 0.159). Also, there was no significant influence of FEV1 after placebo on the POD1 (FEV1 = 0.048 L; p = 0.70) or on the POD2 (FEV1 = 0.0135 L; p = 0.925). CONCLUSION: Intrapleural application of lidocaine is a safe and feasible method to reduce drainage-related pain and improving lung function after CABG.

Analgesia regional en el paciente crítico posquirúrgico / Regional analgesia in postsurgical critically ill patients

La analgesia regional, intrínsecamente y en base a sus efectos fisiológicos, es de uso habitual para el tratamiento perioperatorio del dolor relacionado con procedimientos quirúrgicos. Sin embargo, en otros ámbitos no quirúrgicos, como es el tratamiento del dolor agudo del paciente en situación crítica, no ha sido objeto de estudios prospectivos específicos. Si nos atenemos a los efectos fisiológicos que el bloqueo nervioso tiene en una situación de estrés, las indicaciones de la anestesia regional en este grupo de pacientes se extienden al manejo de una gran variedad de situaciones tanto médicas como posquirúrgicas, al paciente politraumatizado o a otros procedimientos dolorosos realizados en la misma cama del paciente. El paciente crítico, sin duda, debe ser analizado de forma individualizada, dado que su propia afectación primaria de carácter vital, como las desarrolladas de forma asociada, pueden aumentar potencialmente el riesgo de toxicidad sistémica o de morbilidad, como serían las coagulopatías, infecciones, estados de inmunodepresión, sedación y problemas relacionados con la ventilación mecánica. Esta revisión intenta evaluar el papel de la analgesia regional en el paciente crítico, situarla dentro del árbol de decisión de los profesionales responsables de los pacientes en las unidades de cuidados críticos, todo ello en base a la evidencia de beneficios potenciales según la bibliografía publicada (AU)

Regional analgesia intrinsically, based on its physiological effects, is routinely used for the perioperative treatment of pain associated with surgical procedures. However, in other areas such as the non-surgical treatment of acute pain for patients in a critical condition, it has not been subjected to specific prospective studies. If we confine ourselves to the physiological effects of the nerve block, in a situation of stress, the indications for regional anaesthesia in this group of patients extend to the management of a wide variety of medical as well as postsurgical conditions, of trauma patients and of other painful procedures performed in the patient's bed. The critical patient certainly must be analyzed individually as their own primary conditions is of vital importance, as well as any associated conditions they have developed that can potentially increase the risk of systemic toxicity or morbidity, such as, coagulopathies, infection, immunosuppressive states, sedation and problems associated with mechanical ventilation. This review aims to assess the role of regional analgesia in critically ill patients, placing it within the algorithm decision tree of the professional responsible for patients in critical care units, all based on the evidence of potential benefits according to the published literature (AU)

Post-thoracotomy pain relief with subpleural analgesia or thoracic epidural analgesia: randomized clinical trial / Alívio da dor pós-toracotomia com analgesia subpleural ou analgesia epidural torácica: ensaio clínico randomizado

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Post-thoracotomy pain is a severe and intense pain caused by trauma to ribs, muscles and peripheral nerves. The current study aimed to compare subpleural analgesia (SPA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized study at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, in Turkey. METHODS: Thirty patients presenting American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were scheduled for elective diagnostic thoracotomy. The patients were randomized to receive either patient-controlled SPA or patient-controlled TEA for post-thoracotomy pain control over a 24-hour period. The two groups received a mixture of 3 µg/ml fentanyl along with 0.05% bupivacaine solution through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Rescue analgesia was administered intravenously, consisting of 100 mg tramadol in both groups. A visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at rest and during coughing over the course of 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: In the SPA group, all the patients required rescue analgesia, and five patients (33%) required rescue analgesia in the TEA group (P < 0.05). Patients who received subpleural analgesia exhibited higher visual analogue scores at rest and on coughing than patients who received thoracic epidural analgesia. None of the patients had any side-effects postoperatively, such as hypotension or respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia is superior to subpleural analgesia for relieving post-thoracotomy pain. We suggest that studies on effective drug dosages for providing subpleural analgesia are necessary.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Dor pós-toracotomia é severa e intensa, causada por trauma de nervos periféricos, músculos e costelas. O objetivo foi comparar analgesia subpleural (SPA) com analgesia epidural torácica (TEA) em pacientes submetidos à toracotomia. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo randomizado no Hospital Educação e Pesquisa de Numune, em Ancara, Turquia. MÉTODOS: Trinta pacientes com o estado físico I-III da Sociedade Americana de Anestesiologistas foram agendados para toracotomia diagnóstica eletiva e escolhidos aleatoriamente para receber, num período de 24 horas, SPA ou TEA, ambas controladas pelo próprio paciente, para controle da dor pós-toracotomia. Os dois grupos receberam mistura de 3 ug/ml de fentanil com solução de 0,05% de bupivacaína por meio de bomba de analgesia controlada pelo paciente. Foi administrada analgesia de resgate por via intravenosa, com 100 mg de tramadol, nos dois grupos. No pós-operatório, a escala visual analógica foi utilizada para medir presença de dor durante a tosse ou em repouso, ao longo de 24 horas. RESULTADOS: No grupo SPA, todos os pacientes necessitaram de analgesia de resgate. Cinco pacientes (33%) necessitaram de analgesia de resgate no grupo TEA (P < 0,05). Os pacientes com SPA exibiram pontuações superiores na escala visual analógica, em repouso e ao tossir, em comparação aos que receberam TEA. Nenhum dos pacientes teve quaisquer efeitos secundários no pós-operatório, como hipotensão ou depressão respiratória. CONCLUSÃO: A analgesia peridural torácica é superior à analgesia subpleural no alívio da dor pós-toracotomia. Consideramos que estudos sobre a dosagem de drogas eficazes para proporcionar analgesia subpleural são necessários.

A review of a pleural service.

This paper reviews the organisation and outcomes of a pleural service, specifically geared towards the management of malignant pleural effusions, in a district general hospital in the north east of England. We summarise the evidence behind local anaesthetic thoracoscopy and indwelling pleural catheters. We then summarise the review of our service, including a discussion around complications.

Post-thoracotomy pain relief with subpleural analgesia or thoracic epidural analgesia: randomized clinical trial.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Post-thoracotomy pain is a severe and intense pain caused by trauma to ribs, muscles and peripheral nerves. The current study aimed to compare subpleural analgesia (SPA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized study at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, in Turkey. METHODS: Thirty patients presenting American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were scheduled for elective diagnostic thoracotomy. The patients were randomized to receive either patient-controlled SPA or patient-controlled TEA for post-thoracotomy pain control over a 24-hour period. The two groups received a mixture of 3 µg/ml fentanyl along with 0.05% bupivacaine solution through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Rescue analgesia was administered intravenously, consisting of 100 mg tramadol in both groups. A visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at rest and during coughing over the course of 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: In the SPA group, all the patients required rescue analgesia, and five patients (33%) required rescue analgesia in the TEA group (P < 0.05). Patients who received subpleural analgesia exhibited higher visual analogue scores at rest and on coughing than patients who received thoracic epidural analgesia. None of the patients had any side-effects postoperatively, such as hypotension or respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia is superior to subpleural analgesia for relieving post-thoracotomy pain. We suggest that studies on effective drug dosages for providing subpleural analgesia are necessary.

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRAPLEURAL BUPIVACAINE AND MORPHINE ON POST-THORACOTOMY PAIN.

BACKGROUND: Post-thoracotomy pain is the most severe types of postoperative pain. This study compares the effects of intrapleural bupivacaine and morphine on post-thoracotomy pain. METHODS: In a double blind clinical trial study, 30 patients candidate for unilateral thoracotomy were randomly divided into bupivacaine and morphine groups. Patients in the morphine group received 0.2 mg/kg morphine and those in the bupivacaine group received 1 mg/kg bupivacaine by an intrapleural catheter placed at the end of surgery by direct vision. Intrarpleural morphine and bupivacaine continued every 4 hours for the next 24 hours. If required, systemic analgesia with morphine (patient-controlled analgesia, PCA) also used as a postoperative analgesic. The amount of morphine consumption and level of postoperative pain at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Patients did not differ significantly in terms of age, gender and duration of surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to their mean score of pain at 2 and 6 hours of the surgery; however, the level of pain was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group compared to the morphine group at 12 and 24 hours of the surgery. In the bupivacaine group, the mean level of intravenous opioid used over the 24 hours following surgery was significantly lower than in the morphine group. DISCUSSION: Intrapleural injection of bupivacaine can be more effective in reducing post-thoracotomy pain compared to intrapleural morphine.

Epidural versus subpleural analgesia for pulmonary resections: a comparison of morbidities.

There are several methods to mitigate the pain that results from thoracic surgery. All of them may be associated with complications. We analyzed the morbidities associated with epidural and subpleural catheter analgesia in patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer. We conducted a retrospective review of our prospective lung cancer outcomes database for all patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer through a thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. All patients had either an epidural or subpleural catheter placed for pain control. One hundred twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified based on age and pain management technique and the 30-day outcomes were examined. Ninety-three patients had epidural catheters placed and 36 received subpleural catheters. Baseline demographics were similar except for two variables; the subpleural catheter group had a larger proportion of thoracoscopic surgery and more pack-years smoked. Patients in the epidural group were more likely to experience postoperative pruritus and had longer intensive care unit stays but were less likely to use a patient-controlled anesthesia pump. Patients in the subpleural group were more likely to develop intestinal complications. When a subset analysis was done by age (younger than 70 vs 70 years or older), there were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes in the older group. The younger cohort had more pruritus and longer intensive care unit stays in the epidural group. The differences between subpleural and epidural catheters are minimal across all ages and nonexistent for geriatric patients. Thus, the choice of pain management should be determined by individual patient characteristics and risk factors rather than based on age alone.

Intrapleural analgesia using ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural analgesia (IPA) using ropivacaine after thoracoscopic surgery, compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) using ropivacaine. METHODS: forty patients undergoing thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax were randomly assigned to one of two groups. IPA group (n = 20) received intermittent bolus injection of 0.375% ropivacaine into intrapleural space two times; at the end of operation and one more time as the pain increased. TEA group (n = 20) received continuous epidural analgesia with 0.375% ropivacaine. Transrectal diclofenac was administered as an additional analgesic. Pain was assessed on the basis of additional analgesics requirements and by using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: the time courses of VAS scores along the postoperative time course were not significantly different (p = 0.175). Consumption of transrectal diclofenac was significantly smaller in IPA group (p = 0.025). No major complications appeared in both groups, and incidence of adverse symptoms was not different. CONCLUSIONS: in IPA group, pain was managed with less consumption of additional analgesics. IPA could be one of the good choices after thoracoscopic surgery for its efficacy, safety, and benefit of easy placement of the catheter.

Comparison between intermittent intravenous analgesia and intermittent paravertebral subpleural analgesia for pain relief after thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVE: In the present prospective double-blind randomized trial, the effects of intermittent paravertebral subpleural bupivacaine and morphine on pain management in patients undergoing thoracotomy were evaluated and compared with intermittent systemic analgesia. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing elective lobectomy were included in the present study. Three randomized groups consisting of 15 patients each were compared. Those in the control group were administered intravenously with tramadol 100 mg plus metamizol 1000 mg every 4 h for 3 days. We placed the catheter just below the parietal pleura along the paravertebral sulcus at the level of T5-T7. At the end of the operation and every 4 h thereafter, the patients received either 1.5 mg kg(-1) bupivacaine (bupivacaine group) or 0.2 mg kg(-1) morphine sulfate (morphine group) with paravertebral subpleural catheter for 3 days. Data regarding demographics, visual analog pain scores, need for supplementary intravenous analgesia, pulmonary function tests, and postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Visual analog pain scores (visual analog scale (VAS)) were lower in the morphine and bupivacaine groups compared with control group at all postoperative time points. The mean postoperative VAS was significantly different between the control and bupivacaine groups at postoperative hour 12, the control and morphine groups at postoperative hours 6, 12, 48, and 72, and the bupivacaine and morphine groups at postoperative hours 6 and 24 (p<0.05). In the control group, additional analgesic requirement was significantly higher than in the bupivacaine and morphine groups (p<0.05). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in three patients (20%) in the control group, in two patients (13%) in the bupivacaine group, and in one (6%) in the morphine group. CONCLUSIONS: The patients undergoing lung resection through a thoracotomy were observed with reduced postoperative pain and better surgical outcomes with respect to the length of hospital stay, postoperative forced expiratory volume in the first second, pulmonary complications, and need for bronchoscopic management, when paravertebral subpleural analgesia was induced by morphine.

Intrapleural analgesia after endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy / Analgesia intrapleural após simpatectomia videotoracoscópica

PURPOSE: To compare analgesia traditionally used for thoracic sympathectomy to intrapleural ropivacaine injection in two different doses. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were divided into three similar groups, and all of them received intravenous dipyrone. Group A received intravenous tramadol and intrapleural injection of saline solution. Group B received intrapleural injection of 0.33 percent ropivacaine, and Group C 0.5 percent ropivacaine. The following aspects were analyzed: inspiratory capacity, respiratory rate and pain. Pain was evaluated in the immediate postoperative period by means of the visual analog scale and over a one-week period. RESULTS: In Groups A and B, reduced inspiratory capacity was observed in the postoperative period. In the first postoperative 12 hours, only 12.5 percent of the patients in Groups B and C showed intense pain as compared to 25 percent in Group A. In the subsequent week, only one patient in Group A showed mild pain while the remainder reported intense pain. In Group B, half of the patients showed intense pain, and in Group C, only one presented intense pain. CONCLUSION: Intrapleural analgesia with ropivacaine resulted in less pain in the late postoperative period with better analgesic outcomes in higher doses, providing a better ventilatory pattern.

OBJETIVO: Comparar a analgesia tradicionalmente utilizada para simpatectomia videotoracoscópica à injeção intrapleural de ropivacaína em duas doses diferentes. MÉTODOS: Vinte e quatro pacientes foram distribuídos em três grupos semelhantes, e todos eles receberam dipirona endovenosa. O grupo A recebeu tramadol endovenoso e injeção intrapleural de solução salina. O grupo B recebeu injeção intrapleural de ropivacaína a 0,33 por cento, e Grupo C ropivacaína a 0,5 por cento. Os aspectos analisados foram: capacidade inspiratória, freqüência respiratória e dor. A dor foi avaliada no período pós-operatório por meio da escala visual analógica e durante o período de uma semana. RESULTADOS: Nos grupos A e B, a redução da capacidade inspiratória foi observada no período pós-operatório. Nas primeiras 12 horas de pós-operatório, apenas 12,5 por cento dos pacientes nos grupos B e C apresentaram dor intensa em comparação a 25 por cento no Grupo A. Na semana seguinte, apenas um paciente do grupo A apresentou dor leve, enquanto o restante relatou dor intensa. No Grupo B, metade dos pacientes apresentou dor intensa, e no Grupo C, apenas um apresentou intensa dor. CONCLUSÃO: A analgesia intrapleural com ropivacaína resultou em menos dor no pós-operatório tardio com os melhores resultados analgésicos nas doses mais altas, proporcionando um melhor padrão ventilatório.

Intrapleural analgesia after endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare analgesia traditionally used for thoracic sympathectomy to intrapleural ropivacaine injection in two different doses. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were divided into three similar groups, and all of them received intravenous dipyrone. Group A received intravenous tramadol and intrapleural injection of saline solution. Group B received intrapleural injection of 0.33% ropivacaine, and Group C 0.5% ropivacaine. The following aspects were analyzed: inspiratory capacity, respiratory rate and pain. Pain was evaluated in the immediate postoperative period by means of the visual analog scale and over a one-week period. RESULTS: In Groups A and B, reduced inspiratory capacity was observed in the postoperative period. In the first postoperative 12 hours, only 12.5% of the patients in Groups B and C showed intense pain as compared to 25% in Group A. In the subsequent week, only one patient in Group A showed mild pain while the remainder reported intense pain. In Group B, half of the patients showed intense pain, and in Group C, only one presented intense pain. CONCLUSION: Intrapleural analgesia with ropivacaine resulted in less pain in the late postoperative period with better analgesic outcomes in higher doses, providing a better ventilatory pattern.