A comprehensive evaluation of the long-term clinical and economic impact of minor bile duct injury.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after Strasberg grade E bile duct injury have been widely reported. However, there are comparatively few reports of outcomes after Strasberg A to D bile duct injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the long-term clinical and economic impact of Strasberg A to D bile duct injury. METHODS: Patients with Strasberg A to D bile duct injury were identified from a prospectively collected and maintained database. Long-term biliary complication rates, as well as treatment costs were then estimated, and compared across Strasberg injury grades. RESULTS: A total of N = 120 patients were identified, of whom N = 49, 13, 20, and 38 had Strasberg grade A, B, C, and D bile duct injury, respectively. Surgical repair was most commonly performed in Strasberg grade D injuries (74% vs 8%-20% in lower grades, P < .001). By 5 years post bile duct injury, the estimated long-term biliary complication rate was 40% in Strasberg grade D injuries, compared with 15% in Strasberg grade A (P = .022). A significant difference in total treatment and follow-up costs was also detected (P < .001), being highest in Strasberg grade D injuries (mean £11,048/US$14,252 per patient) followed by the Strasberg grade B group (mean £10,612/US$13,689 per patient). DISCUSSION: Strasberg grade A to D injuries lead to considerable long-term morbidity and cost. Strasberg grade D injuries are typically managed surgically and result in the highest complication rate and treatment costs. Strasberg grade B injuries lead to a similar complication rate and treatment cost but are often managed without surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP compared with device-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is the second most common weight loss surgery in the United States. Treatment of pancreaticobiliary disease in this patient population is challenging due to the altered anatomy, which limits the use of standard instruments and techniques. Both nonoperative and operative modalities are available to overcome these limitations, including device-assisted (DAE) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), laparoscopic-assisted (LA) ERCP, and endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE). The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ERCP-based modalities for treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases in post-RYGB patients. METHODS: A decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of EDGE, DAE-ERCP, and LA-ERCP in post-RYGB patients. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess a plausible range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, net monetary benefit calculations, and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed to assess how changes in key parameters affected model conclusions. RESULTS: EDGE resulted in the lowest total costs and highest total quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for a total of $5188/QALY, making it the dominant alternative compared with DAE-ERCP and LA-ERCP. In probabilistic analyses, EDGE was the most cost-effective modality compared with LA-ERCP and DAE-ERCP in 94.4 % and 97.1 % of simulations, respectively. CONCLUSION: EDGE was the most cost-effective modality in post-RYGB anatomy for treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases compared with DAE-ERCP and LA-ERCP. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that this conclusion was robust to changes in important model parameters.

Spending on Bariatric Surgery in the Unified Health System from 2010 to 2014: a Study Based on the Specialist Hospitals Authorized by the Ministry of Health.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze the production of 76 specialist hospitals for the morbidly obese in Brazil's public healthcare system (SUS) from 2010 to 2014 in terms of quantity and costs of bariatric surgery and its complications. METHODS: Secondary data from the SUS Hospital Information System and the National Healthcare Establishments Registry were used. Current spending on bariatric surgery and its medical and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a 60 % rise in the number of surgeries between 2010 and 2014. This increase was not homogeneous among the hospitals studied, since only 19 performed the minimum number of surgeries required. Women accounted for 85 % of the surgeries carried out, and 32 % were aged between 35 and 44 years. The Roux-en-Y technique was the most widely used (93.7 % of the total), followed by sleeve gastrectomy. The ratio between the occurrence of medical complications and total number of surgeries performed in each hospital varied significantly (between 0 and 5.97 %) but was lower for postoperative complications, ranging from 0 to 1.7 %. There was a nominal increase of 44 % in average expenditure on postoperative complications between 2013 and 2014, while the average cost of medical complications decreased by 8.7 % in the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rise in the number of bariatric surgeries in Brazil, there is still a high demand for surgeries that is not being met, while most specialist hospitals fail to perform the minimum number of surgeries stipulated by the Ministry of Health.

Single versus double Roux-en-Y reconstruction techniques in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative single-center study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of single Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RYR) and double Roux-en-Y reconstruction (dRYR) on intraoperative outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2005 for dRYR and RYR after PD or PPPD at the study hospital were evaluated for inclusion. Comparison of categorical patient characteristics was performed using the χ (2) test. Data were reported as median and range. Differences were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme and the recommendations of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were included in final analysis. The median time of surgery was significantly shorter when performing a single Roux-en-Y loop reconstruction (55 min in PD and 50 min in PPPD) (p < 0.001). Saved time had a significant effect on the cost of surgery (p < 0.001). No impact on postoperative outcome according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the ISGPS definitions of pancreatic fistulas, and delayed gastric emptying was evident. The relaparotomy rate due to severe postoperative hemorrhage was significantly higher in the dRYR PD cohort (2.2 vs. 11.9 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Double Roux-en-Y reconstruction of the alimentary tract is not beneficial in terms of surgical outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality and should be avoided due to unnecessarily prolonged surgery.

The use, safety and cost of bariatric surgery before and after Medicare's national coverage decision.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) bariatric surgery national coverage decision (NCD) on the use, safety, and cost of care CMS beneficiaries. BACKGROUND: In February 2006, the CMS issued a NCD restricting reimbursement for bariatric surgery to accredited centers and including coverage for laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). METHODS: A pre/postinterrupted time-series cohort study using nationwide Medicare data (2004-2008) evaluating rates of bariatric procedures/100,000 enrollees, 90-day mortality, readmission rate and payments. RESULTS: Forty-seven thousand thirty patients underwent procedures at 928 sites pre-NCD and 662 post-NCD. The procedure rate/100,000 patients dropped after the NCD to 17.8 (from 21.9 in 2005) increasing to 23.8 and 29.1 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Open roux-en-y gastric bypass (ORYGB) and laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were common pre-NCD (56.0% ORYGB, 35.5% LRYGB) changing post-NCD with LAGB inclusion (12.8% ORYGB, 48.7% LRYGB, 36.7% LAGB). 90-day mortality pre-NCD was 1.5% (1.8% ORYGB, 1.1% LRYGB) and post-NCD was 0.7% (1.7% ORYGB, 0.8% LRYGB, 0.3% LAGB; P < 0.001). The 90-day rates of readmission decreased post-NCD (19.9% to 15.4%), reoperation (3.2% to 2.1%) and payments ($24,363 to $19,746; P for all <0.001). Differences in outcome and cost were largely explained by a shift in procedure type and patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The NCD was associated with a temporary reduction in procedure rate and a shift in types of procedures and patients undergoing bariatric surgery. It was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of death, complications, readmissions, and per patient payments.

The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of postoperative complications on full in-hospital costs per case. BACKGROUND: Rising expenses for complex medical procedures combined with constrained resources represent a major challenge. The severity of postoperative complications reflects surgical outcomes. The magnitude of the cost created by negative outcomes is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Morbidity of 1200 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery from 2005 to 2008 in a tertiary, high-volume center was assessed by a validated, complication score system. Full in-hospital costs were collected for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using a multivariate linear regression model adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: This study population included 393 complex liver/bile duct surgeries, 110 major pancreas operations, 389 colon resections, and 308 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 1.8%, whereas morbidity was 53.8%. Patients with an uneventful course had mean costs per case of US$ 27,946 (SD US$ 15,106). Costs increased dramatically with the severity of postoperative complications and reached the mean costs of US$ 159,345 (SD US$ 151,191) for grade IV complications. This increase in costs, up to 5 times the cost of a similar operation without complications, was observed for all types of investigated procedures, although the magnitude of the increase varied, with the highest costs in patients undergoing pancreas surgery. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the dramatic impact of postoperative complications on full in-hospital costs per case and that complications are the strongest indicator of costs. Furthermore, the study highlights a relevant savings capacity for major surgical procedures, and supports all efforts to lower negative events in the postoperative course.

The cost, quality of life impact, and cost-utility of bariatric surgery in a managed care population.

Our purpose was to assess the cost, quality of life impact, and the cost-utility of bariatric surgery in a managed care population. We studied 221 patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2001 and 2005. We analyzed medical claims data for all patients and survey data for 122 survey respondents (55% response rate). Patients were generally middle-aged, female, and white. Sixty-four percent underwent open and 33% underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y procedures. One year after surgery, mean body mass index fell from 51 to 31 kg/m(2) in women and from 59 to 35 kg/m(2) in men with substantial improvements in comorbidities. Postsurgical mortality and morbidity were low. Total per member per month costs increased in the 6 months before bariatric surgery, were lower in the 12 months after bariatric surgery, but increased somewhat over the next 12 months. When presurgical quality of life was assessed prospectively, average health utility scores improved by 0.14 one year after surgery. In analyses that took a lifetime time horizon, projected future costs based on age and obesity and discounted costs and health utilities at 3% per year, the cost-utility ratio for bariatric surgery versus no surgery was approximately $1,400 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. In sensitivity analyses, bariatric surgery was more cost-effective in women, non-whites, more obese patients, and when performed laparoscopically. Although not cost-saving, bariatric surgery represents a very good value for money. Its long-term cost effectiveness appears to depend on the natural history and cost of late postsurgical complications and the natural history and cost of untreated morbid obesity.

Transoral technique for gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) can accelerate learning curve and reduce cost.

BACKGROUND: The stapled gastrojejunostomy of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) can be created by linear and circular stapling techniques. In the circular-stapled technique, the anvil of the stapler can be introduced into the gastric pouch transabdominally or pulled down the esophagus (transorally) by attachment to a modified gastric tube. The purpose of this study is to determine if the transoral technique to introduce the anvil will reduce operative time and cost compared with the transabdominal technique, which requires creating a new gastrotomy to insert the anvil and followed by its closure. METHODS: We compared 60 consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic RYGBP. First 30 cases were performed by transabdominal anvil insertion, followed by 30 cases using transoral anvil insertion. All of the transabdominal cases were assisted by experienced fellows. The first ten transoral cases were assisted by experienced fellows and the remaining 20 by new fellows in order to evaluate if the transoral technique shortens the learning curve. Surgery duration and operative costs were compared. Complications (bleeding, leaks, anastomotic strictures, ulcers, wound infections) and length of stay were also evaluated. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Mean operative time was shorter in the transoral group compared with the transabdominal group (162.2 +/- 35.8 vs. 186 +/- 33.6 min respectively, p = 0.01), even though most of the transoral cases (n = 20) were assisted by new fellows and all of the transabdominal cases by experienced fellows. Operative times were not different between new and experienced fellows in the transoral technique. Supply costs per patient were higher in the transabdominal technique compared with the transoral technique (2,983.5 +/- 540.9 vs. 2,658.8 +/- 474.4 USD, respectively, p = 0.03). Perioperative complications and length of stay were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: The transoral introduction of the anvil of the circular stapler into the gastric pouch is a simple, safe, and efficient technique for creating the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic RYGBP. In addition, the transoral technique is less expensive and appears to accelerate the learning curve compared with the transabdominal technique.

The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) has been proven to be a safe and well-tolerated approach to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, despite its increased cost when compared to the open approach (OGBP). This increased expense has led many to question whether LGBP is a cost effective alternative to OGBP. The aim of this study is to determine which approach is most cost effective, considering costs associated with the operation itself, perioperative complications, and income lost during convalescence. METHODS: A PubMed search of the National Library of Medicine online journal database was conducted. Studies that met predetermined criteria for selection were included in the analyses of patient demographics, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, excess weight loss, and time to recovery. Data on 6,425 OGBP and 5,867 LGBP patients were used to compare the outcomes associated with each approach. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the perioperative complication profiles, time to recovery, and overall expense of the two approaches. OGBP was associated with an increased incidence of major perioperative complications, especially extraintestinal complications, and greater perioperative mortality. LGBP was associated with shorter hospital stays, increased incidence of intestinal complications, and a 2.25% incidence of conversion to OGBP. Patient demographics and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 3 years follow-up were found to be similar with both OGBP and LGBP. CONCLUSION: LGBP is a cost effective alternative to OGBP for surgical weight loss. Despite the increased cost of LGBP, patients suffer fewer expensive and lifethreatening perioperative complications.

The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of hospital volume of bariatric surgery on morbidity, mortality, and costs at academic centers. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The American Society for Bariatric Surgery recently proposed categorization of certain bariatric surgery centers as "Centers of Excellence." Some of the proposed inclusion criteria were hospital volume and operative outcomes. The volume-outcome relationship has been well established in several complex abdominal operations; however, few studies have examined this relationship in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: Using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnosis and procedure codes, we obtained data from the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base for all patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity between 1999 and 2002 (n = 24,166). Outcomes of bariatric surgery, including length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, observed and expected (risk-adjusted) mortality, and costs were compared between high-volume (>100 cases/year), medium-volume (50-100 cases/year), and low-volume hospitals (<50 cases/year). RESULTS: There were 22 high-volume (n = 13,810), 27 medium-volume (n = 7634), and 44 low-volume (n = 2722) hospitals included in our study. Compared with low-volume hospitals, patients who underwent gastric bypass at high-volume hospitals had a shorter length of hospital stay (3.8 versus 5.1 days, P < 0.01), lower overall complications (10.2% versus 14.5%, P < 0.01), lower complications of medical care (7.8% versus 10.8%, P < 0.01), and lower costs ($10,292 versus $13,908, P < 0.01). The expected mortality rate was similar between high- and low-volume hospitals (0.6% versus 0.6%), demonstrating similarities in characteristics and severity of illness between groups. The observed mortality, however, was significantly lower at high-volume hospitals (0.3% versus 1.2%, P < 0.01). In a subset of patients older than 55 years, the observed mortality was 0.9% at high-volume centers compared with 3.1% at low-volume centers (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery performed at hospitals with more than 100 cases annually is associated with a shorter length of stay, lower morbidity and mortality, and decreased costs. This volume-outcome relationship is even more pronounced for a subset of patients older than 55 years, for whom in-hospital mortality was 3-fold higher at low-volume compared with high-volume hospitals. High-volume hospitals also have a lower rate of overall postoperative and medical care complications, which may be related in part to formalization of the structures and processes of care.

DRG, costs and reimbursement following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an economic appraisal.

BACKGROUND: There is disagreement regarding hospital and physician reimbursement fees when DRG codes are used. We have found that physicians and hospitals are rewarded differently depending on the type of insurance coverage - per diem HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) vs public. METHODS: 133 patients were retrospectively analyzed in a single institution. There were 59 privately-insured and 74 publicly-insured patients. Using DRG 288, hospital and surgeon reimbursement rates, complications, length of stay, blood loss and basic demographics were evaluated on all patients. Reimbursement rates were then compared to inpatient hospital costs per case for both open and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Statistical analysis used Student's t-test and standard deviation. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, sex and BMI. There was a large difference in physician reimbursement when comparing public to private insurance (931 US dollars +/-73 vs 2356 US dollars +/-822, P<0.001). Likewise, there was a large difference in hospital reimbursement (public 11773 US dollars +/- 4462 vs private 4435 US dollars +/- 3106, P<0.001). The estimated costs for open gastric bypass was 3179 US dollars vs 4180 US dollars for the laparoscopic bypass. The HMO per diem rate was 1000 US dollars per day. CONCLUSION: There is a relative disincentive for surgeons to treat publicly-insured patients, while there is an incentive for hospitals to treat those patients. The converse is true for the privately-insured patients. This dichotomy will impede the development of new centers and place greater burden on bariatric surgeons to reduce cost by performing the open RYGBP.

Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques.

HYPOTHESIS: Although perceived as a more technically demanding and time-consuming technique, the hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with fewer complications and lower costs than stapled techniques. DESIGN: A retrospective medical record review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2001. INTERVENTION: Three techniques were compared: hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA), circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA), and linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative costs, including the cost of stapling devices, the cost of sutures, and operative times, were compared. Rates of anastomotic strictures, leaks, marginal ulcers, bleeding, and wound infections were determined. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients underwent HSA; 13, CSA; and 8, LSA. Supply costs per patient were higher for CSA ($955) and LSA ($435) than for HSA ($2) (P<.001). The mean +/- SEM operative time for laparoscopic RYGB was longer when performing CSA than HSA or LSA (285 +/- 22 vs 215 +/- 8 and 204 +/- 28 minutes, respectively; P<.001). Stricture rates were higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (4 [31%] of 13 patients vs 3 [3%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.01). The wound infection rate was higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (3 [23%] of 13 patients vs 1 [1%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.001). There was no difference in anastomotic bleeding, and no anastomotic leaks occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this experience, hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic RYGB reduced operating room supply costs and was completed faster than stapled techniques. However, these differences may reflect the learning curve because these techniques were used early in our experience. Lower postoperative stricture and wound infection rates seem to be the primary benefits of the HSA technique.

An alternative linear stapling technique for performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: The use of stapling devices for performing gastrointestinal anastomosis has gained wide acceptance in the last decade. Linear cutting devices have been used routinely during gastrointestinal operations in our hospital since 1992. However, we still have shortage of stapling devices due to cost reduction politics. METHODS: We propose a modification of the standard technique in order to reduce the number of devices used. Our technique employs a single stapled including the section of the jejunum and the side-to-side jejunoanastomosis. RESULTS: We have used this technique for 1 year without complications related to the stapled anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: This technique may reduce the time of reconstruction of Roux-en-Y anastomosis without interfering in its final result. This modified technique may be useful in hospitals with reduced economic resources.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypass does not improve outcome and increases costs when compared to open gastric bypass for the surgical treatment of obesity.

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Hand-Lap GB) has been adopted by some surgeons to treat morbid obesity because it is easier to perform than the total laparoscopic procedure, but to date no study has compared the outcomes of patients undergoing the Hand-Lap GB to those obtained with the open procedure (Open GB). We hypothesized that patients undergoing Hand-Lap GB would lose a similar amount of weight when compared to Open GB patients, while experiencing no increase in complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower overall costs of care, in part as a result of fewer incisional hernias requiring subsequent surgery. METHODS: Nonrandomized, prospective data were collected on all patients undergoing proximal GB via Hand-Lap or open approaches between May 1998 and July 1999. Our first 25 Hand-Lap GB procedures, performed in selected patients (with no extensive previous abdominal surgery) referred to two of us (E.J.D, M.A.S), were compared to all other (n = 62) concurrent open proximal GB performed by the group during this period of time in patients with body mass index (BMI) <50 kg/m2. RESULTS: Preoperatively, Hand-Lap GB patients did not differ from Open GB patients in age (40 +/- 11 vs 43 +/- 11 years), gender (92% female vs 81% female), incidence or type of preoperative comorbid conditions, preoperative weight (282 +/- 33 vs 280 +/- 37 lb), or BMI (45.5 +/- 5.4 vs 44.1 +/- 3.3 kg/m2). (Data given as mean +/- standard deviation). Although length of hospital stay did not differ between groups (3.6 +/- 1.3 vs 4.2 +/- 4.6 days), total hospital costs were significantly higher for Hand-Lap GB ($14,725 +/- 3089 vs. $10,281 +/- 3687, p <0.01 ANOVA). One patient in the Open GB group developed an anastomotic leak from the gastrojejunostomy. Follow-up revealed that Hand-Lap GB patients had a similar risk of postoperative complications as the Open GB group, including marginal ulcer (16% vs 14.5%), stomal stenosis (24% vs 23%), and, most notably, incisional hernia (20% vs 27%). There were no major wound infections or deaths in either group. One patient in each group developed a postoperative small bowel obstruction. Loss of excess weight in Hand-Lap GB patients at 12 months postoperatively was 66 +/- 14% vs 77 +/- 14% in the Open GB group. CONCLUSIONS: The Hand-Lap GB yielded good weight reduction in a population of morbidly obese patients, but at a higher cost for hospital care than Open GB. There was no decrease in the incidence of incisional hernias with the Hand-Lap GB procedure. Although Hand-Lap GB appears to be safe and effective, its failure to provide a decrease in hospital stay or risk of incisional hernia requiring subsequent surgical repair is significant. The primary role for the Hand-Lap GB procedure should therefore be to aid surgeons in developing skills to climb the steep learning curve for total laparoscopic gastric bypass, since Hand-Lap GB does not improve patient outcome and increases cost in comparison to the open GB procedure.

Prophylactic cholecystectomy with gastric bypass operation: incidence of gallbladder disease.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is one of the major risk factors for gallbladder disease, and this risk is even greater following rapid weight loss. Because of this, prophylactic cholecystectomy has been offered to our patients undergoing the transected silastic ring vertical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TSRVRYGBP). A study was undertaken to determine the incidence of pathologic gallbladders in patients undergoing this prophylactic cholecystectomy. METHOD: The records of all patients who underwent TSRVRYGBP from June 1999 through December 2000 were reviewed. Pathologic findings of the gallbladder were documented as cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholesterolosis, polyps or normal. RESULTS: 761 patients underwent the operation. 178 patients (23%) had cholecystectomy before the surgery. 154 (20%) had gallstones documented by ultrasound and had cholecystectomy at the time of the surgery. 324 of the 429 patients with negative preoperative findings by ultrasound had pathologic evidence of gallbladder disease. CONCLUSION: Because of the high incidence of gallbladder disease even with negative preoperative findings in morbidly obese patients and the lack of significant morbidity with cholecystectomy in experienced hands, routine cholecystectomy at the time of the weight loss operation is justified.

Cost comparison of endoscopic stenting vs surgical treatment for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Total lifetime costs of endoscopic vs surgical treatment for obstructive jaundice due to cholangiocarcinoma are difficult to assess. The purpose of this study was to compare total costs in these two groups, including all treatment and retreatments. METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with biopsy-proven cholangiocarcinoma treated this decade with either endoscopic biliary stenting or surgical biliary-enteric bypass with or without resection. Outcomes and hospital charges were recorded. Ten matched control patients were compared from each group. Costs included those for cost of repeat endoscopy in the endoscopic group and for the management of recurrent obstructive jaundice in the surgical group. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age and gender ratio. The surgical approach was frequently for cure; therefore, surgical patients were by and large at an earlier stage of their disease than those in the endoscopic group. Mean survival for the endoscopic group was 19 months vs 16.5 months for the surgical group. The median total lifetime cost for surgical therapy was $60,986 vs $24,251 for endoscopic therapy. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy is an effective palliative therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Endoscopic therapy for this entity costs significantly less than surgical treatment. The cost benefit of endoscopic stenting over standard surgical bypass in the management of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, when considered along with its minimally invasive approach, makes this the procedure of choice for palliative therapy.