Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
A A Pract ; 14(8): e01238, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32643901

RESUMEN

Opioid-free perioperative approaches hold promise to reduce opioid use after surgery and their associated side effects. Here, we report the perioperative analgesic plan of a patient who requested opioid-free care for an open partial hepatectomy. Opioid-free anesthesia care for abdominal surgery is usually dependent on epidural analgesia. However, as in this case, placing an epidural is not always an option due to contraindications such as infection, coagulopathy, or patient refusal. Our multimodal management plan provided an alternative opioid-free, epidural-free perioperative strategy that may prove useful for other patients undergoing similar surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Anestesia/tendencias , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Conocimiento de la Medicación por el Paciente , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Pediatrics ; 145(6)2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32398328

RESUMEN

A 15-year-old girl is scheduled to undergo an upper lobectomy to debulk metastatic Ewing sarcoma. The anesthesiologist recommended placement of a thoracic epidural catheter to provide postoperative analgesia. The patient did not want a needle to be placed near her spine. She was terrified that the procedure would be painful and that it might paralyze her. Although the anesthesiologist reassured her that sedation and local anesthesia would make the procedure comfortable, she remained vehemently opposed to the epidural procedure. The parents spoke privately to the anesthesiologist and asked for placement of the epidural after she was asleep. They firmly believed that this would provide optimal postoperative analgesia and thus would be in her best interest. Experts discuss the pros and cons of siding with the patient or parents.


Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente/ética , Anestesia Epidural/ética , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/ética , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente/psicología , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Neoplasias Óseas/psicología , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Padres/psicología , Sarcoma de Ewing/psicología , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología
3.
J Perinat Med ; 48(5): 463-470, 2020 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229677

RESUMEN

Background Mother-infant bonding is an emerging perinatal issue. While emergency cesarean deliveries are associated with a risk of bonding disorders, the mode of anesthesia used for emergency cesarean deliveries has never been studied in this context. We aimed to investigate the impact of administering general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia to women undergoing cesarean deliveries on mother-infant bonding. Methods This was a retrospective, propensity score-matched multivariable analysis of 457 patients who underwent emergency cesarean deliveries between February 2016 and January 2019 at a single teaching hospital in Japan. The Mother-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) scores at hospital discharge and the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit were evaluated in the general anesthesia and the neuraxial anesthesia groups. A high score on the MIBS indicates impaired mother-infant bonding. Results The primary outcome was the MIBS score at hospital discharge in propensity score-matched women. After propensity score matching, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] MIBS scores were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group than those in the neuraxial anesthesia group at hospital discharge [2 (1-4) vs. 2 (0-2); P = 0.015] and at the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit [1 (1-3) vs. 1 (0-2); P = 0.046]. In linear regression analysis of matched populations, general anesthesia showed a significant and positive association with the MIBS scores at hospital discharge [beta coefficient 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.147-1.59); P = 0.019] but not at the 1-month postpartum outpatient visit [0.455 (-0.134 to 1.044); P = 0.129]. Conclusion General anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery is an independent risk factor associated with impaired mother-infant bonding.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Cesárea/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Relaciones Materno-Fetales , Apego a Objetos , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia General/psicología , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Japón , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 148(2): 187-191, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755555

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cognitive flexibility and labor and delivery outcomes. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of nulliparas with singleton term pregnancy, admitted for labor to a tertiary referral center from 1 January to 31 July, 2017. After epidural anesthesia, parturients completed the validated Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (20 questions that evaluate a person's level of cognitive flexibility) before delivery. They were asked to grade (from 1 to 10) their hope for vaginal delivery (Hope score). Within 2 hours after delivery, they graded (1-10) the similarity between their delivery and their expectations (Expectation score). Outcomes of the flexible versus less flexible group were compared. RESULTS: Among the flexible (n=120) versus less flexible (n=40) group, vaginal delivery was more common (74.2% vs 20.8%) than vacuum extraction (20.8% vs 35%) or cesarean delivery (5% vs 12.5%) (P=0.031). High Expectation score and delivery without grade III-IV perineal tear (P=0.032) were correlated. Groups were similar regarding Expectation (P=0.163) and Hope scores (P=0.591). The mode of delivery of parturients was not correlated with their mothers' (P=0.836) or sisters' (P=0.758). CONCLUSION: High cognitive flexibility increases the likelihood of vaginal delivery. These findings support the mind-body correlation. Maternal cognitive perceptions can influence labor and delivery and should be considered when counseling patients during labor.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Función Ejecutiva , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 300(5): 1239-1244, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549222

RESUMEN

KEY MESSAGE: Listening to music during labor increases the likelihood that primiparas will have a spontaneous vaginal delivery. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of exposure to music during labor on the mode of delivery and parturients' stress levels. METHODS: This prospective, interventional study included 124 low-risk women who were recruited during latent phase of their first labor after epidural anesthesia. Patients were grouped according to their preference to receive music intervention or not. The music intervention included two subgroups: soft classical music and rhythmic music. We evaluated cortisol levels in saliva as a surrogate for stress level and State-Trait Personality Inventory at enrollment and 1-3 h later in all women who were still in labor. Delivery and perinatal outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. Correlations between the music intervention and maternal and perinatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more frequent among women listening to music compared to the non-music group (P = 0.035). A trend towards lower rates of cesarean delivery was noted in the music group (P = 0.08), with no difference in instrumental vaginal delivery rates. Stress levels, as measured by questionnaires and by cortisol levels, blood pressure and pulse rate, remained similar throughout the study. No differences were noted between the different genres of music when examining obstetric and perinatal outcomes and stress levels. CONCLUSION: Listening to music during labor, improves the likelihood of primiparas to have a vaginal delivery regardless of stress level. As this treatment is simple, easy, and harmless to administer, we suggest it may be offered to all patients during labor.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Música/psicología , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Qual Life Res ; 27(8): 2027-2033, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603114

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in maternal quality of life (QOL) from pregnancy to 6 weeks after delivery between routine labor epidural analgesia (EA) and pain relief on maternal request only. METHODS: \Women delivering of a singleton in cephalic presentation beyond 36 + 0 weeks' gestation were randomly allocated to EA as a routine during labor (routine EA group), or to any kind of analgesia on request only (control group). The Short Form health survey (SF-36) was used to assess women's QOL before randomization, and 6 weeks postpartum. Data were analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 488 women were included, and antepartum as well as postpartum SF-36 questionnaires were filled in by 356 (73.0%) women, 176 (49.4%) in the routine EA group, and 180 (50.6%) in the control group. Changes from the QOL antepartum to the QOL 6 weeks postpartum were comparable between both groups, also in the subgroup of women in the control group who gave birth without any pain medication (n = 41, 22.8%). Maternal age and the incidence of adverse events related to EA, which were both higher in the routine EA group, had no influence on the changes in QOL. Differences in request for pain relief were comparable with other studies. CONCLUSION: Routine administration of EA during labor and pain relief on maternal request only are associated with comparable changes of women's QOL antepartum to 6 weeks postpartum.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto , Paridad , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol ; 38(2): 152-158, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed changes in anxiety during different phases of childbirth in a sample of women demanding epidural anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal case series. SAMPLE: A total of 133 women who demanded epidural anesthesia for childbirth answered the questionnaires. METHODS: Anxiety state was measured using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. The STAI-S (anxiety state) was administered in three phases during childbirth: Phase 1 was before applying epidural anesthesia, Phase 2 was 45 min after the application of epidural anesthesia and Phase 3 was at less than 24 h after delivery. Data were collected in two general hospitals: a third-level public hospital and a well-recognized private hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: STAI scores. RESULTS: Anxiety state decreases significantly after applying the epidural anesthesia (Phase 2) compared to before anesthesia (Phase 1), and it remains low levels 24 h after childbirth (Phase 3). There were statistically significant differences in STAI scores between the different phases administrated (Phases 1 and 2: p < 0.001; effect size, d = 1.40; Phases 1 and 3: p < 0.001; effect size, d = 1.39). In Phase 3, women with cesarean section birth had significant differences in STAI scores relative to those with spontaneous birth (p = 0.037; d = 0.44). The type of health-care setting (public or private), the educational level and the numbers of previous births does not affect the level of anxiety state in women in any of the three phases. CONCLUSIONS: Women's anxiety decreases significantly after applying epidural anesthesia, and it remains low 24 h after delivery. Anxiety against childbirth was not influenced by the health system used by women, by the condition of primiparous or multiparous, or by the educational level. Women who received an epidural anesthesia with a cesarean section reported higher rates of anxiety state after birth.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Parto/psicología , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
9.
Spine J ; 17(4): 511-517, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27777051

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Medical interventional modalities such as lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESIs) are often used in the setting of lumbar spine disorders where other conservative measures have failed. Concomitant depression can lead to worse outcomes in lumbar spine pathology. A number of studies have demonstrated an association between preoperative depression and poor outcomes following surgery, but the effect of depression on outcomes following medical interventional modalities is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between depressed and non-depressed patients undergoing LESI. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This study is an analysis of a prospective longitudinal registry database at a single academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients undergoing LESI from 2012 to 2014 were eligible for enrollment into a prospective, web-based registry. Eligible patients had radicular pain, correlative imaging findings of degenerative pathology, and failed 6 weeks of conservative care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The PROs measured included the (1) numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP), (2) numeric rating scale for leg pain (NRS-LP), (3) disease-specific physical disability-Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and (4) preference-based health status-EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent LESI. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and at 12 months following treatment. Based on previously validated values for the Zung Depression Scale (ZDS) as a screening tool for depression, patients were dichotomized into non-depressed (ZDS score ≤33) and depressed (ZDS score >33). The PRO change scores from baseline to 12 months were calculated. The mean absolute and change scores between the groups were compared using Student t test. Multivariable linear regression analysis for ODI, EQ-5D, NRS-LP, and NRS-BP was performed. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients with complete 12-month follow-up were included. Seventy-one patients (44%) were classified as depressed and 90 patients (56%) were classified as non-depressed. The mean baseline PRO scores were significantly worse in depressed patients compared with non-depressed patients: ODI (p<.001), NRS-BP (p=.013), NRS-LP (p<.001), and EQ-5D (p=.001). The mean absolute scores at 12 months were significantly lower in the depressed versus non-depressed patients: ODI (p<.001), NRS-BP (p=.001), NRS-LP (p=.05), and EQ-5D (p=.003). However, there was no difference in mean change scores observed at 12 months between the depressed and non-depressed cohorts: ODI (p=.42), NRS-BP (p=.31), NRS-LP (p=.25), EQ-5D (p=.14). Adjusting for pre-procedure variables, the higher ZDS score was associated with higher disability (ODI) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Depression led to worse absolute scores for PROs and is associated with higher disability following LESI. However, patients with depressive symptoms can expect similar improvement in PROs at 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Depresión/complicaciones , Inyecciones Epidurales/psicología , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales/efectos adversos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/psicología
10.
J Perinat Med ; 42(4): 435-9, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334423

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The literature provides no clear evidence linking maternal optimism/pessimism to birth outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether maternal expectations and predictions regarding mode of delivery and epidural anesthesia aligned with birth outcomes. METHODS: Primiparous, low-risk pregnant women at term filled in questionnaires in which they rated their chances of a vaginal delivery (VD) or a cesarean section (CS), and their intention to receive epidural anesthesia. Their responses were compared to actual outcomes. RESULTS: Pre-birth perceptions of odds of delivery by a CS were significantly higher (P=0.04) among women who eventually had a vacuum extraction (VE) or CS as a result of an arrest disorder, compared with women who had a VD and those who had a CS or a VE due to non-reassuring fetal heart monitor. Intention to receive epidural anesthesia was significantly lower (P<0.001) among women who gave birth without it. CONCLUSION: The pessimistic pre-birth perceptions of women of high odds for a CS may be related to an increased risk of arrest disorders of labor. However, the prenatal assessments of primiparous women are poor predictors of their demand for epidural anesthesia during labor. Larger-scale studies to determine whether pre-partum psychological interventions may contribute to the process of labor and improve obstetric outcomes are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Madres/psicología , Paridad , Resultado del Embarazo/psicología , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Cesárea/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Percepción , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
11.
Am J Perinatol ; 29(10): 823-6, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22773278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between concentration, as measured by the Interactive Metronome, and a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous patients. STUDY DESIGN: From September 2008 to November 2009, nulliparous women at ≥34 weeks' gestation who were planning to use an epidural were asked to perform a 1-minute Interactive Metronome clapping test. Scores and demographic information were recorded. Data were then abstracted regarding each patient's labor course. The main outcome measure was the frequency of the second stage of labor exceeding 2 hours. Only patients with epidural anesthesia who completed the second stage of labor and did not require operative delivery performed for fetal indications prior to 2 full hours of pushing were included. RESULTS: Of the patients whose Interactive Metronome test scores were in the last quartile, which we associated with poor concentration, 52.9% (18/34) had a second stage of labor exceeding 2 hours compared with only 31.7% (33/104) of patients whose scores placed them in the first three quartiles (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Nulliparous patients with poor concentration scores, as measured by the Interactive Metronome, were more likely to push greater than 2 hours in the second stage of labor.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Epidural , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Vigilia/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Puntaje de Apgar , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Demografía , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tamizaje Neonatal , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Paridad , Embarazo , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 18(4): 362-7, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19733054

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compared anxiety in two groups of women undergoing elective cesarean delivery to ascertain if their partner's presence during neuraxial anesthesia placement affected patients' overall anxiety levels. METHODS: Three hundred fifteen patient-partner dyads were randomized to two groups: group 1 partners were present in the operating room during neuraxial anesthesia placement while group 2 partners remained outside the operating room during placement. Before surgery, all patient-partner dyads completed a survey of demographics, anesthetic experiences and baseline anxiety. Anxiety levels were rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the state portion of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: The mean change in anxiety as measured by VAS among patients whose partners were present in the operating room for neuraxial anesthetic placement decreased from before to after the procedure (-4.5+/-25.8; P=0.03; 95% CI -8.55, -0.45); the mean change in anxiety in patients whose partners were not present did not alter significantly (+1.9 +/- 25.3; P=0.34; 95% CI 6.68, 12.12). Anxiety was increased among partners who were not present (+9.4, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although patients whose partners were present in the operating room at the time of neuraxial anesthesia placement reported less anxiety over the time of the study than did patients whose partners were not present, these differences were small and are not considered to be clinically important. Increased anxiety among partners who were not present at neuraxial placements warrants further study.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia Obstétrica/psicología , Anestesia Raquidea/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Cesárea/psicología , Esposos/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Cesárea Repetida/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Psicometría
13.
Hong Kong Med J ; 13(3): 208-15, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17548909

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient attitudes about epidural services in labour and correlate them with patient options and actual usage of epidural analgesia. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Eight Hospital Authority obstetrics units. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of new antenatal patients and a cohort of postnatal in-patients over 1 calendar month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antenatal patient awareness of epidural services and attitudes towards epidural analgesia during labour; the actual usage of such analgesia and the reported experience of postnatal patients. RESULTS: A total of 2109 and 2851 patients completed the antenatal and postnatal survey, respectively. The former revealed that only 47% of patients had been exposed to the concept of epidural analgesia in labour, and only 13% opted for such analgesia. In the postnatal cohort, the overall epidural analgesia rate was 10%, although 19% had actually requested it. Patients who received epidural analgesia in labour were more likely to consider their experience as favourable (85%) compared to those who went through labour without such analgesia (26%) [P<0.001]. There was no significant improvement in knowledge about epidural analgesia among postnatal as compared to antenatal patients. The main reasons generally ascribed by patients for not being able to obtain an epidural service despite it being requested, were related to limited resources. CONCLUSION: The results showed poor general awareness of pregnant women about the proper role of epidural analgesia in labour, leading to a low patient demand for such services. Despite the low prevailing request rate for epidural analgesia in labour, there appears to be a lack of adequate resources to meet the demand.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Obstétrica/psicología , Anestesia Obstétrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hong Kong , Humanos , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol ; 70(2): 108-112, 2005.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-437538

RESUMEN

Este artículo tiene como objetivo realizar una revisión de la evidencia disponible en relación con la presencia de una "doula" durante el parto. Llamamos "doula" a una mujer que acompaña a otra durante el trabajo de parto y parto, brindando apoyo emocional continuo durante este periodo. Desde hace 25 años se han realizado múltiples estudios randomizados controlados para evaluar el efecto del acompañamiento de una "doula" en el parto. Los resultados son sorprendentes, significativos y consistentes en relación con aspectos obstétricos como menores tasas de partos operatorios (cesáreas y fórceps), menor necesidad de uso de analgesia durante el trabajo de parto y parto, menor duración del trabajo de parto. También se han evaluado aspectos psicológicos como mejor percepción de la vivencia del parto, mayor autoestima y menores tasas de depresión postparto e incluso se ha visto que ayuda a mejorar el apego madre hijo y las tasas de lactancia materna. Dado los resultados de esta revisión, creemos que es de gran importancia establecer iniciativas para extender esta práctica.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Antropología Cultural/historia , Antropología Cultural/tendencias , Apego a Objetos , Trabajo de Parto/historia , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Cesárea/psicología , Parto Humanizado , Mujeres/historia , Mujeres/psicología
15.
Masui ; 53(10): 1136-42, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15552945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of services by patients is an essential component of quality improvement in anesthesiology. Therefore, it is important to identify the factors for patient dissatisfaction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 9974 consecutive patients who had received spinal or general anesthesia for elective surgery between 1999 and 2002. Pre-anesthetic, intra-anesthetic and post-anesthetic variables were recorded and patient satisfaction was assessed using direct interviews at the post-anesthetic clinic. Qualitative data on dissatisfaction were obtained by asking patients' reasons for dissatisfaction. RESULTS: 348 of the 8843 respondents (3.9%) had dissatisfaction with anesthesia. The rates of dissatisfaction were higher in women than in men and in spinal anesthesia than in general anesthesia, and were observed mostly in the patients aged from 20 to 39 years. Qualitative data show that the common reasons for dissatisfaction with anesthesia were spinal anesthesia as the most dissatisfactory factor, followed by epidural anesthesia, postoperative pain, vomiting/nausea and memory of tracheal extubation. However, other various factors were associated with dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for anesthesiologists to satisfy all patients, because patients' senses of values were varied. However, we conclude that anesthesiologists can improve the quality of anesthesia by enlightenment of the patient about anesthesia, and moreover, by better peri-anesthetic management for dissatisfactory factors with anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia Raquidea/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología
16.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 115(1): 43-50, 2004 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15223164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of obstetric variables on four dimensions of the birth experience. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The birth experience of 251 German-speaking women was assessed at 48-96 h postpartum by means of Salmon's item list--German-language version (SIL-Ger). METHOD/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical correlations and variances between four dimensions of the birth experience (fulfillment, emotional adaptation, negative emotional experience, physical discomfort) and common obstetric variables were calculated. The explained variance is assessed by a stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: In general the variance explained by the investigated obstetric variables per se is low. The mode of delivery affects the dimension of negative emotional experience with a constant qualitative worsening in the order of spontaneous deliveries, instrumental deliveries, elective and unplanned caesarean sections. Epidurals are associated neither with positive nor with negative evaluative feelings. To assess the impact of duration, the subjective latent phase of labour has to be taken into consideration in addition to the duration of labour itself. Not only very long durations of labour, but also very short ones may induce negative evaluative feelings in the immediate postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Further research on this question must include the aspect of the parturients' subjective perception of both obstetric procedures and the attending staff. Clinicians should be aware that epidurals and elective caesarean sections do not necessarily enhance positive evaluative feelings in the immediate postpartum.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Obstetricia/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Cesárea/psicología , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Emociones , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Edad Materna , Dolor , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Can J Anaesth ; 49(6): 583-7, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12067871

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare patients who participate in a clinical trial for pain management involving epidural anesthesia to those who refuse and document their reasons for refusing. METHODS: Demographic and health history information was collected from 621 female patients who were screened for inclusion in a pain management trial involving epidural anesthesia. Patients who completed the clinical trial (n = 149) were compared to those who consented to provide screening information but did not enter the trial (n = 472). RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of women who refused cited unwillingness to have an epidural as the reason for their decision. Non-Caucasians (P < 0.01), patients with no history of mood/anxiety disorders (P < 0.016) or systemic disease (P < 0.02), and patients with certain types of pain (P < 0.02) were more likely to refuse to participate in the clinical trial. A longer duration between recruitment and surgery was also found to be associated with higher participation rates (P < 0.01). A logistic regression equation significantly predicted which patients would participate or refuse (P < 0.0001), indicating that a specific set of health and demographic factors strongly influence the decision to participate in a trial. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to participate in a clinical trial is viewed as a risk/benefit analysis. Factors such as short recruitment to surgery intervals and pre-existing pain, which increase the salience of risks associated with the trial, may result in lower participation rates. Overall, epidural anesthesia is a strong deterrent to participation in a clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/psicología , Manejo del Dolor , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos
18.
Anaesthesia ; 55(8): 744-9, 2000 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10947686

RESUMEN

We investigated the correlation between the scores attained on computerised psychometric tests, measuring psychomotor and information processing aptitudes, and learning obstetric epidural anaesthesia. Ten anaesthetic trainees performed an adaptive tracking task (ADTRACK 3) and one information management task (MAZE) from the MICROPAT testing system. They then embarked on a standardised obstetric anaesthesia training programme prior to performing obstetric on-call duties. The success or failure of their first 50 obstetric epidurals was recorded. There was a significant correlation between mean obstetric epidural failure rate for the second 25 consecutive epidurals and ADTRACK 3 (r = -0.579, p = 0.04) scores. The correlation between the means of the first 25 and 50 consecutive epidurals and ADTRACK 3 scores was not significant. There was no significant correlation between epidural failure rate and MAZE scores. The ratios of the mean epidural failure rate for the last 25 epidurals to the mean for the first 25 epidurals were not significantly correlated with ADTRACK 3 or MAZE scores. Psychomotor abilities appear to be poor determinants of trainees' initial proficiency at obstetric epidural anaesthesia or of trainees' rates of progress during early obstetric epidural training, but may be determinants of an individual's performance after the initial training phase.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia Obstétrica/psicología , Anestesiología/educación , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/normas , Analgesia Obstétrica/psicología , Analgesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestesia Epidural/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Masculino
19.
Contracept Fertil Sex ; 27(4): 306-12, 1999 Apr.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10349774

RESUMEN

The present study investigates why some women, before and during delivering, request peridural analgesia or, on the contrary, refuse it. On the basis of a literature review and of an empiricial study involving 57 women, a psychological differentiation is attempted to discriminate users from non-users of peridural analgesia. Pain perceptions, health locus of control, when internal (IHLC), family and couple adaptability appear to be discriminating factors. Our results indicate a higher chance locus of control (externality) in non-users then in users, as well as a more rigid couple functioning. The incidence of Internal Health Locus of Control of pain perception is outlined.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Obstétrica/psicología , Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Adulto , Análisis Discriminante , Femenino , Humanos , Control Interno-Externo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Masui ; 47(9): 1085-9, 1998 Sep.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9785783

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to assess perioperative changes in psychological features of patients receiving anesthesia and operation. Anxiety level and desire for obtaining information were evaluated in 37 patients using the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) at three points: before and after the preanesthetic examination, and 3 to 5 days after the operation. Anxiety scale (4-20) and information scale (2-10) scores decreased postoperatively from 9.8 +/- 3.8 to 7.3 +/- 3.4 and from 6.1 +/- 2.1 to 4.1 +/- 1.9, respectively. There was a significant but weak correlation (rs = 0.35) between the anxiety scale and information scale before the preanesthetic examination. The postoperative information scale score correlated well with preoperative anxiety scale score (rs = 0.61), and this correlation was higher than with preoperative information scale score (rs = 0.37). When patients were divided into two subgroups, namely patients with (U, n = 12) or without (non-U, n = 25) an increase in postoperative information scale score, anxiety scale score before the preanesthetic examination tended to be higher and the postoperative anxiety scale score was significantly higher in the U group than in the non-U group. We conclude that we should provide more information to the patients who have higher anxiety scale score before the preanesthetic examination regardless of their degree of desire for information.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/psicología , Anestesia General/psicología , Ansiedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Masculino , Escala de Ansiedad Manifiesta , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...