Open versus endovascular repair for extracranial carotid aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECCAs) are rare; however, they are associated with a high risk of stroke and mortality if untreated. In the present review, we compared the major outcomes between open and endovascular repair of ECCAs. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for clinical studies reported online up to September 2020 that had evaluated major outcomes after both open and endovascular repair of ECCAs. Eligible studies were required to have evaluated at least the 30-day mortality or stroke and/or transient ischemic attack rates. The quality of the studies was also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, seven studies (three high quality, two medium quality, and two low quality) with 374 patients and 383 ECCAs were eligible. All the studies had been reported from 2004 to 2020. In total, 220 open repairs were compared with 81 endovascular repairs. The open and endovascular treatments showed similar 30-day mortality rates (4% vs 0%; pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291-24.451) and stroke and transient ischemic attack rates (5.5% vs 1.2%; pooled OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.412-4.886). Open repair was associated in six studies with a greater incidence of cranial nerve injury compared with endovascular repair (14.5% vs 0%; OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.178-13.471). The hematoma or bleeding rate was also similar between the two methods in six studies (5.2% vs 0%; OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.518-7.094). CONCLUSIONS: Open and endovascular repair of ECCAs is associated with similarly low early mortality and cerebrovascular event rates, although open repair showed a greater risk of cranial nerve injuries. An endovascular approach could be more appropriate when the aneurysm is located distally or requires extensive dissection. More studies are needed with standardized follow-up durations to evaluate late outcomes.

Evolving Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options for Visceral Artery Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) are associated with a very high mortality rate when ruptured and may present as a surgical emergency. Due to their rarity and varying pathophysiology, literature concerning the optimal management of VAAs is limited. This review evaluates the evolving management options for VAAs with a focus on open and endovascular repair. METHODS: A combination of databases including OVID, PubMed and Medline were used to perform a literature search. Search terms employed include 'visceral artery aneurysms', 'angiography', '3D-volumetric rendering', 'management', 'open repair' and 'endovascular repair', amongst others. RESULTS: 3D modelling in conjunction with existing diagnostic techniques, such as computed tomography and angiography, may improve diagnostic sensitivity. The literature surrounding operative management of VAAs highlights the effectiveness of endovascular repair for anatomically suitable aneurysms. Advances in endovascular technologies may expand the type and number of aneurysms amenable to catheter-based treatment approaches. For aneurysms not amenable to endovascular treatment, or those with an emergency indication, open repair remains an appropriate management choice. CONCLUSION: Although rare, VAAs pose a high mortality risk, especially when ruptured. Practical limitations that restrict current operative approaches may be overcome by recent developments including novel neurointerventional techniques that have been applied in VAA management.

Comparison of Outcomes for Open Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair Using Vein and Prosthetic Conduits.

BACKGROUND: Autologous vein is considered the preferred conduit for lower extremity bypass. There is, however, limited literature regarding conduit choice for open popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair. We sought to compare outcomes of PAA repair using vein versus prosthetic conduits. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2019) was queried for patients with PAAs undergoing elective conventional revascularization originating from the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Conduits were categorized as vein or prosthetic. Primary outcomes were primary graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE) and MALE-free survival at 2-years. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used for estimation and comparison of patency. RESULTS: A total of 1,146 limbs in 1,065 patients underwent elective open revascularization for PAA. Vein was used in 921 limbs (80%), and prosthetic in 225 (20%). Patients in the prosthetic cohort had a shorter procedure time, were older, and had a higher prevalence of COPD. Postoperatively, prosthetic patients were more likely to be started and maintained on anticoagulation without increased incidence of hematoma. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection (2% vs. 2%; P = 0.946). There was an increased tendency toward more symptomatic patients in the vein cohort although not statistically significant (49% vein vs. 41% prosthetic; P = 0.096). On a mean follow-up of 13 ± 5 months, the incidence of MALE and MALE-free survival were comparable between the two groups. The 2-year primary and secondary patency rates were similar, 87% and 96% in the vein, and 91% and 95% in the prosthetic groups, respectively. At multivariable analysis, outflow bypass targets to the infrapopliteal arteries (HR 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-3.65; P = 0.014) and symptomatic aneurysm (HR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.15; P = 0.037) were independently associated with loss of primary patency. Conduit type did not make a difference in MALE-free survival, or primary graft patency at 2-years. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that conventional open PAA repair with prosthetic conduit yields results comparable to those with vein conduit with regard to primary and secondary patency and MALEs at 2-years for targets to the popliteal artery. However, when the distal target was infrapopliteal, worse outcomes were observed with prosthetic conduit. Our results suggest that vein conduit should be preferentially used for infrapopliteal targets, while prosthetic conduit confers comparable outcomes in a subset of patients who do not have suitable autologous vein conduits.

Patient Characteristics, Patterns, and Repair of Aneurysms in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a multisystem disease and is associated with vascular complications including aneurysm formation. HIV-associated aneurysms are well documented and may present in unusual locations with concerning features. However, the literature regarding aneurysms in HIV-positive patients is limited to case series with limited data regarding aneurysm patterns. Furthermore, several small series have documented poor outcomes with surgical repair. Thus, our aim was to investigate the characteristics, patterns, and repair of aneurysms in HIV-positive patients in a multicenter study. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of aneurysms and HIV were retrospectively identified from 2013 to 2018 across 2 institutions. Comorbidities, HIV-related characteristics, aneurysm characteristics, and repair were reviewed. RESULTS: There were a total of 104 HIV-positive patients with 129 aneurysms. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 57.7 ± 10.3 years, 80.8% of patients were male, and 32.0% had a history of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The average time from HIV diagnosis to aneurysm diagnosis was 14.1 ± 10.1 years. There were 53 (41.1%) ascending aortic, 25 (19.4%) abdominal aortic, 14 (10.9%) cerebral artery aneurysms, 13 (10.1%) descending thoracic, 9 (7.0%) iliac, 6 (4.7%) femoropopliteal, 4 (3.1%) visceral, 3 (2.9%) axillosubclavian, 1 (0.8%) carotid, and 1 (0.8%) coronary artery aneurysms. There were 23 (22.1%) patients with aneurysms in multiple vascular beds, 10 (9.6%) saccular aneurysms, and 1 (0.8%) inflammatory aneurysm. There were 7 ruptures (cerebral, descending thoracic, and iliac), 3 type A dissections (ascending aorta), and 1 thrombosis (popliteal). There were 26 (25.0%) patients who underwent surgical repair. This included 8 endovascular aneurysm repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysms, 6 endovascular coiling, clipping, and stent procedures for cerebral aneurysms, 4 open ascending aorta repairs, 2 bypasses for popliteal artery aneurysms, 2 endovascular stents for axillosubclavian artery aneurysms, 1 open descending aortic aneurysm repair, 1 endovascular aneurysm repair for an iliac aneurysm, 1 endovascular coiling for a renal artery aneurysm, and 1 open repair of a femoral artery aneurysm. Perioperative complications were common at 46.2%, although mortality was low at 3.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Although aneurysms were widespread, most HIV-positive patients had large vessel aneurysms in this study. There was a high prevalence of saccular and multiple aneurysms, and repair was associated with low rates of mortality despite high rates of complications. Additional studies are necessary to characterize this rare entity.

Experience of managing superior mesenteric artery aneurysm and its midterm follow-up results with 18 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms and provide evidence for clinical decision-making. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the diagnosis and treatment of 18 cases of superior mesenteric artery aneurysm admitted to our center from 2003 to 2020, including demographic data, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and follow-up results. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 49.1 years, and males accounted 83.3%. The development of the disease was associated with infection, hypertension, pancreatitis, and trauma, but no significant associations with atherosclerosis were noted by our results. Nine patients were diagnosed with true aneurysm, seven patients with pseudoaneurysm, and two patients with dissecting aneurysm. Rupture of aneurysm occurred in three patients (16.7%), and one of them died before surgery. The surgery success rate was 94.1%, and open surgery was performed on nine patients, endovascular surgery on three patients, and conservative treatment on three patients. The follow-up rate was 77.8% (14/18), and the average follow-up time was 48.2 months. The mortality and reintervention rate during follow-up was 0. The two-year patency rate of artificial vessels and covered stents was 50%. CONCLUSION: The clinical manifestations and features of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms vary between patients. Careful evaluation of vascular anatomy and personalized treatment strategy are critical in the management of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms. Midterm follow-up results of superior mesenteric artery aneurysms are satisfactory.

Contemporary Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Single Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) for extracranial carotid aneurysm (ECCA) in the authors' centre. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ECCA and underwent intervention from January 2005 to July 2019 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for OS and ES were analysed. ECCAs were divided into three morphological subgroups: subgroup Ⅰ, no severe tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA) proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅱ, severe ICA or CCA tortuosity proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅲ, aneurysm tortuosity and 1 cm peri-aneurysmal carotid artery > 90°. RESULTS: 35 patients underwent OS, 20 patients underwent ES and 2 patients underwent OS after the failure of ES. Thirty-six cases were classified in subgroup Ⅰ, 11 cases in subgroup Ⅱ, and 10 cases in subgroup Ⅲ. ES was achieved successfully in all 18 cases of subgroup I, but failed in three of four cases in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ. With a mean duration of 62.9 ± 44.5 months of follow up, five deaths were recorded in the OS group, two of which were caused by ipsilateral stroke and three were not neurologically related. There was no stroke or death in the ES group during follow up. One case of stroke and two cases of death occurred in symptomatic patients, while one case of stroke and three cases of death occurred in asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that ES may be a safe and durable option for ECCA in subgroup Ⅰ, while in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ, ES alone may be difficult to apply. A 30 day stroke rate around 5% existed in ECCAs with interventions, which should be considered before the intervention.

Renal artery aneurysms in pregnancy-Management of an uncommon but serious vascular lesion.

Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is defined as a localized saccular or fusiform dilation of the renal vasculature that exceeds 50% of the adjacent artery diameter. RAAs are rare in the general population and account for <1% of all peripheral aneurysms. Incidental diagnosis of RAA has increased due to the widespread clinical application of visceral duplex ultrasound scanning and computed tomography imaging. While the diagnosis of RAA before or during pregnancy is rare, pregnancy increases the risk of rupture significantly during the third trimester, with associated high mortality rates for both mother and fetus. The rarity of pregnancy-related RAAs contributes to our limited knowledge of their natural history, morphologic features, criteria for intervention, and treatment options. This review compiles opinions of published articles to provide an updated overview of RAA in pregnancy and aid clinicians in the management of this rare but serious vascular condition. An RAA 1.5 cm in diameter requires open or endovascular treatment in a woman planning to become pregnant or who is pregnant.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of visceral artery aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between endovascular and open surgery approaches. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with VAAs. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: We included 80 observational studies that were mostly noncomparative. Data were available for 2845 aneurysms, comprising 1279 renal artery, 775 splenic artery, 359 hepatic artery, 226 pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal arteries, 95 superior mesenteric artery, 87 celiac artery, 15 jejunal, ileal and colic arteries, and 9 gastric and gastroepiploic arteries. Differences in mortality between open and endovascular approaches were not statistically significant. The endovascular approach was used more often by surgeons. The endovascular approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and lower rates of cardiovascular complications but higher rates of reintervention. Postembolization syndrome rates ranged from 9% (renal) to 38% (splenic). Coil migration ranged from 8% (splenic) to 29% (renal). Otherwise, access site complication were low (<5%). Pseudoaneurysms tended to have higher mortality and reintervention rates. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with VAAs. Despite the low certainty warranted by the evidence, these rates along, with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility, can help patients and surgeons in shared-decision making.

Surgical Experience of Behcet's Disease Involving the Peripheral Artery.

BACKGROUND: Behcet's disease with arterial involvement shows rapid poor progression compared with Behcet's disease without arterial involvement, such that it may be thought of as a different disease. With arterial involvement, high rates of postoperative recurrence and anastomotic complications are observed. METHODS: The medical records of 1,361 patients diagnosed with Behcet's disease who visited our hospital from January 2007 to December 2019 were reviewed. Overall, 118 patients with blood vessel involvement were considered. Those with only vein involvement, intracerebral arterial involvement, and coronary arterial involvement were excluded. The 8 patients who underwent surgical treatments and the 9 patients who underwent conservative treatments were included and reported in this study. RESULTS: The mean age and mean follow-up duration of the 17 patients with peripheral arterial involvement were 49.82 ± 13.24 years and 89.85 ± 52.70 months, respectively. In all cases where the operations were performed, the first operation was an emergency operation for rupture of the aneurysm, impending sign of rupturing, or acute ischemia. Eight patients received a total of 18 operations. The average number of operations per patient and the reoperation rate were 2.25 ± 0.89 times and 75%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of the patients who underwent surgery were 75.0% and 30.0%, respectively. When arterial involvement occurs in the form of an aneurysm, the hazard ratio for death is 9.644 (P = 0.040, confidence interval 1.11-83.74). CONCLUSIONS: When the artery invades in the form of an aneurysm, the mortality rate is higher regardless of surgery. The main cause of mortality is complications that occur in the anastomosis sites after the operation. Postoperative short-term and regular imaging of the anastomosis area can be beneficial to detect such complications early to decrease the frequency of emergency surgeries, which will help reduce mortality.

Outcome of Open and Endovascular Repair in Patients with Acute Limb Ischemia Due to Popliteal Artery Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) carries a risk of sudden thromboembolism, resulting in acute limb ischemia (ALI). Since 2010, all 65 year-old-men in Region Skåne are invited for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening, and subsequently for PAA if AAA is detected. The aims of the study were to explore if the ratio of PAAs treated electively compared with acute has changed since the implementation of the AAA screening program and to investigate the risk factors for major amputation, mortality, and combined major amputation/mortality after acute open repair (OR) or endovascular repair (ER) for PAA with ALI. METHOD: Medical charts of patients treated for PAA between January 1, 2009 and February 1, 2019 were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code I72.4. Data gathered into a preset database. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for major amputation/mortality. RESULTS: There was an increase in PAAs treated electively (n = 84) compared with acute (n = 41) during the study period (P = 0.014). Four (17.8%) electively treated patients with PAA of 23 eligible were detected because of AAA screening. No patient in the ER group underwent major amputation after a median follow-up time of 30 months. At the end of follow-up, there was no difference in major amputation/mortality (P = 0.64) between patients with ALI receiving OR or ER, respectively. Only atrial fibrillation was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in elective PAA repair was not a consequence of AAA screening. The zero major amputation rate after ER in ALI due to PAA at mid-term was unexpectedly low. A randomized controlled trial between OR and ER is warranted.

A Comparison of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, popliteal artery aneurysms (PPAs) were treated via open repair (OR). However, more recently endovascular repair (EVR) approaches have become more common for the treatment of PPAs. The present meta-analysis therefore sought to conduct an up-to-date review of studies comparing the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. To that end, patient outcomes including primary patency, operating time, hospital stay duration, and re-intervention, amputation, and graft occlusion within 30 days were compared for these OR and EVR approaches. METHODS: Studies in which OR and EVR were compared as treatments for PPAs were identified through systematic searching of the PubMed and Embase databases. Any studies either analyzing only one of these treatments in isolation or analyzing <5 patients were not included in this analysis. For all relevant studies, patient demographic information and outcome details were compiled. Risk of bias was analyzed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios, mean differences, and hazard ratios (HRs) for patient outcomes were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: In total, we identified 17 relevant studies including a single randomized controlled trial and 16 retrospective cohort studies, incorporating 6887 total cases (1662 EVR and 5225 OR). The quality of evidence for all measured outcomes was deemed to be very low or low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Rates of primary patency were found to be significantly higher for patients treated via OR relative to those treated via EVR (HR = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.30; P = .03). Operative and hospitalization durations, in contrast, were significantly lower for patients treated via EVR. Patients treated via EVR also experienced significantly higher rates of graft thrombosis and reintervention within 30 days relative to patients treated via OR. However, no significant differences were observed between treatments with respect to rates of patient amputation (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.55-1.85; P = .98). CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that PPA repair via EVR is a safe alternative to OR, but that short-term graft thrombosis and reintervention rates are significantly greater for the former approach. Moreover, few studies to date have compared these techniques and those that were largely retrospective in nature with relatively low-quality evidence, making it difficult to make definitive statements regarding the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. Additional population-based large-scale studies are therefore essential in order to conduct a robust evaluation of the safety and utility of EVR as an alternative to OR for PPA repair.

Long-term results of polytetrafluoroethylene versus saphenous vein repair of degenerative carotid artery aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and great saphenous vein (GSV) bypass after resection of a degenerative aneurysm of the carotid artery. METHODS: From January 1994 to November 2017, 37 patients (27 men) with a mean age of 58 years (range, 39-82 years) with a degenerative aneurysm of the carotid artery (median diameter, 28 mm; range, 19-42 mm), underwent resection of the aneurysm followed by a bypass with either a GSV (n = 10) or a PTFE prosthesis (n = 27). Although 31 patients were asymptomatic, 6 patients were symptomatic: transient ischemic attack (n = 4), minor stroke (n = 1), and compression of the hypoglossal nerve (n = 1). The preoperative workup included duplex ultrasound examination of the arteries to the head, and angiography or computed tomography angiography. All patients were operated under general anesthesia and six were intubated through the nose. Sixteen patients were monitored through transcutaneous oximetry. No shunt was used in this series. In 10 patients receiving a PTFE graft, the external carotid artery was implanted in the prosthesis. Mean follow-up was 16.9 ± 2 years (95% confidence interval, 14.5-19.3 years). Primary end points were the 30-day combined stroke/death rate, graft infection, late graft patency, and late stroke-free survival. Secondary end points were cranial nerve injury and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was nil in both groups. One postoperative stroke was observed in the PTFE group, whereas none occurred in the GSV group (P = .84). No graft infection was observed in either group. At 10 years, survival in the GSV group was 80 ± 12%, and survival in the PTFE group was 76 ± 8% (log-rank [Mantel-Cox], P = .85). In the GSV group, graft patency at 7 and 10 years was 85 ± 13%. In the PTFE group B, graft patency was 100% (log-rank [Mantel-Cox], P = .12). No late stroke was observed. Two transient cranial nerve injuries were observed in the GSV group (20%) and two in the PTFE group (8%) (P = .97). Length of hospital stay was comparable in both groups (GSV group, 6 days; PTFE group, 5 days; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, after resection of a degenerative aneurysm of the carotid artery, bypass with a PTFE prosthesis gives comparable results to those obtained with the GSV. We recommend sparing the GSV and instead using a PTFE prosthesis in patients with a degenerative aneurysm of the carotid artery.

Effect of Intra-operative Intra-arterial Thrombolysis on Long Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) as a result of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) thrombosis represents a significant problem. The aim of this study was to investigate outcome of intra-operative intra-arterial thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemia due to PAA thrombosis in terms of major adverse limb events (MALE), overall survival, and intrahospital complications, especially those associated with bleeding. METHODS: A total of 156 patients with Rutherford grade IIa and IIb acute ischaemia resulting from PAA thrombosis were admitted between 1 January 2011 and 1 January 2017. The patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent additional treatment with intra-operative intra-arterial thrombolysis (20 patients), and those who did not (136 patients). By using covariables from baseline and angiographic characteristics, a propensity score was calculated for each patient. Each patient who underwent intra-operative thrombolysis was matched to four patients from the non-thrombolysis group. Thus, comparable patient cohorts (20 in the thrombolysis and 80 in the non-thrombolysis group) were identified for further analysis. The primary end point was MALE and the secondary endpoint all cause mortality. RESULTS: After a median follow up of 55 months, the estimated MALE rate was significantly lower in the thrombolysis group (30% vs. 65%, chi square = 10.86, p < .001, log rank test). Also, patients in the thrombolysis group had a significantly lower mortality rate (20% vs. 42.65%, chi square = 3.65, p = .05, log rank test). The thrombolysis group had wound/haematoma related interventions performed more commonly (25% in thrombolysis vs 8%, in non-thrombolysis group), but the difference was not significant (p=.013). There were no cases of major (intracranial and gastrointestinal) bleeding in either group. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that intra-operative thrombolysis in the treatment of selected patients with ALI due to PAA thrombosis has long term MALE and overall survival benefits, without a significant risk of major, life threatening bleeding complications.

Εndovascular Repair of Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Both true and false extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAA) are a potential source of morbidity and mortality. While ECAA have historically been treated surgically, endovascular reconstruction with stenting is an emerging treatment option. The aim of our study was to report clinical/radiologic outcomes following endovascular repair of ECAAs. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 68 case reports and case series, comprising 162 patients, were included. Most patients presented with at least one symptom or sign related to the ECAA (89.5%; N = 145/162). In 42.6% (N = 69/162) and 46.3% (N = 75/162) of the cases polytetrafluoroethylene covered and uncovered stents were deployed respectively. Immediate post-procedural imaging demonstrated complete aneurysm exclusion in 86.4% (N = 140/162) of the cases and minimal filling of the aneurysm sack in 10.5% (N = 17/162) of all cases. Perioperative adverse event rates were 3.1% for stroke, 1.2% for transient ischemic attack (TIA) and 4.3% for mortality. During a mean follow-up of 21.8months, there were additionally observed one stroke, two TIAs and three deaths. Overall 88.6 % of the patients (N = 117/132) remained asymptomatic, partially recovered or at least did not suffer from new neurologic deficits during follow up, with no signs of stenosis or occlusion of the carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stenting for the treatment of ECAAs is feasible with acceptable short- and long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. Prospective real-world studies are needed to further validate the safety and the long-term patency of endovascular repair.

Single-center experience with extracranial carotid aneurysm open repair.

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to report our single center experience with extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAA) open repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including the perioperative and postoperative data of all patients who underwent ECAA repair between 2008 and 2015. The operative technique was based on aneurysm size, anatomical features and operative risk. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (6 men and 8 women, mean age 60.5 years) were admitted for ECAA. Thirteen patients (92.8%) were submitted to ECCA open repair while in one patient (7.2%) conservative treatment was realized. Bilateral lesions and concomitant internal carotid artery (ICA) kinking was observed in 2 cases (14.2%). Seven patients (50%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis and ECCA localization involved ICA in 9 cases (64.2-69.2%). Aneurysmectomy with end-to-end anastomosis was performed in 3 cases (23.07-23.1%), patch arterioplasty in 2 cases (15.38-15.4%), prosthetic graft interposition in 4 cases (30.76-30.7%), autologous vein graft bypass in 3 cases (23.07-23.1%) and artery ligation with distal ICA anastomosis in one case (7.6-7.6%). No perioperative deaths, major neurological complications and surgical reinterventions were recorded. Overall survival at a mean follow-up of 19.6 months (range 0-52 months) was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: ECAA open repair represents a safe surgical option, with lower prevalence of complications and no need for reintervention in high volume centers.

Carotid Artery Aneurysm in HIV: A Review of Case Reports in Literature.

BACKGROUND: HIV infection may affect the cardiovascular system through different physiopathological patterns. Rarely reported in HIV negative patients, aneurysms involving the carotid artery have been described for the first time in seropositive patients in 1989. AIMS: In our study, we have focused on aneurysm pathology affecting carotid arteries in HIV patients, analyzing clinical and surgical presentation, management, and outcome, through a review of cases published in the literature. METHODS: The MEDLINE (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) database was reviewed for "carotid artery aneurysm AND HIV OR AIDS OR immunodeficiency." RESULTS: Nineteen articles including a total of 46 cases were included in our report. The mean age of patients was 30.6 ± 14.2 years; 30 patients (65.2%) were male. Aneurysms were localized in the intracranial carotid (41.3%) or extracranial artery (58%). Presenting features included symptoms due to compression of neck structures; positivity for neurological symptoms occurred in 36.9%. Patients were managed surgically in 58.7% of cases; surgical morbidity and mortality were of 22.2% and 7.4% respectively, higher for endovascular procedures. The overall mortality in treated and untreated cases was 26.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms may occur in both the extracranial and intracranial carotid artery in patients with HIV at younger age than in non-HIV patients and are linked to a high morbidity and mortality. Seropositivity must be ruled out whenever this rare vascular condition may occur in the absence of a more likely aetiology and must also be suspected in HIV patients presenting with compressive symptoms of the neck, neurological impairment or stroke.

Visceral artery aneurysms: review on indications and current treatment strategies.

Visceral arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are rare entities. Despite infrequent, these lesions are clinically important and potentially lethal, since 22% present as clinical emergencies and 8.5% result in death. As such, early detection and treatment is essential. Through this work, we aim to address both visceral arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, with particular focus on their epidemiology, etiology and risk factors, as well as report current diagnostic workups and treatment strategies. A full literature review was performed through a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed databases, including articles published until the end of November 2018 and using the following keywords: "visceral aneurysm," "pseudoaneurysm" and "endovascular treatment." From this research, 2043 articles had their abstract assessed, 359 were read integrally, 213 were excluded for not being directly related to the subject and 146 were included, according to the authors preference and scientific relevance in this work's context. Visceral arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms have fairly similar clinical presentations and diagnostic workups. Differences reside mainly in their etiology and indications for treatment, since immediate treatment is recommended for pseudoaneurysms regardless of their size, while true aneurysms have specific treatment cutoffs. Despite a significant improvement on current diagnostic and treatment strategies, these lesions are still frequently diagnosed only upon rupture, with significant mortality rates. Endovascular strategies represent the first line of treatment on the majority of cases, although open surgery continues to play a role in specific conditions. Visceral arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are rare but potentially fatal and, as such, proper diagnosis and treatment is of capital importance. Due to its minimally invasive nature, endovascular therapies currently represent the standard of care in the majority of situations, although there are still solid indications for open surgery. Technique selection should be performed according to the clinical scenario and baseline anatomy.

Complication Incidences and Treatment Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-A Single-Center Long-Time Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: Few long-time follow-up studies describe all complications, treatment outcome of complications, and mortality in relation to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and treatment outcome including mortality of radiological visible complications related to the EVAR procedure at a single center with up to 10 years' surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with EVAR from March 2006 to March 2016 at a Danish university hospital, 421 in total, were included. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, follow-up, and secondary intervention data were collected from a national database and medical records. Follow-up computed tomography angiography and plain abdominal X-ray reports were reviewed for complications. Scans and X-rays with suspected complications were evaluated by an interventional radiologist. RESULTS: A total of 172 complications in 147 patients, mainly in the beginning of the follow-up period, were found; 35% had a least one complication. The main part of complications (62%) was type II endoleaks, followed by stent graft stenosis (11%), type I endoleaks (9%), and stent graft occlusion (7%). A total of 66 (38%) complications, observed in 55 patients, were treated with reintervention, of which 77% were treated with endovascular procedures and 23% with surgical treatment, that is, 13% of all studied patients had a complication that required a reintervention. The remaining 2 of the 3 complications were treated conservatively. We found no increased all-cause mortality in connection with having a complication including those requiring reintervention. CONCLUSION: We presented a 10-year single-center study of EVAR. Many patients treated with EVAR had a radiological visible complication, mainly in the beginning of the follow-up period. Only a smaller fraction required reintervention and having a reintervention-requiring complication was not connected to increased mortality.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of visceral artery aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between endovascular and open surgery approaches. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with VAAs. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: We included 80 observational studies that were mostly noncomparative. Data were available for 2845 aneurysms, comprising 1279 renal artery, 775 splenic artery, 359 hepatic artery, 226 pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal arteries, 95 superior mesenteric artery, 87 celiac artery, 15 jejunal, ileal and colic arteries, and 9 gastric and gastroepiploic arteries. Differences in mortality between open and endovascular approaches were not statistically significant. The endovascular approach was used more often by surgeons. The endovascular approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and lower rates of cardiovascular complications but higher rates of reintervention. Postembolization syndrome rates ranged from 9% (renal) to 38% (splenic). Coil migration ranged from 8% (splenic) to 29% (renal). Otherwise, access site complication were low (<5%). Pseudoaneurysms tended to have higher mortality and reintervention rates. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with VAAs. Despite the low certainty warranted by the evidence, these rates along, with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility, can help patients and surgeons in shared-decision making.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of elective and urgent late open conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we systematically reviewed late open conversions after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies, and performed a meta-analysis on the 30-day mortality rates for urgent and elective late conversions. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched for studies published up to June 2018 that focused on late open conversion of failed EVAR (ie, >30 days after the initial EVAR), reported the primary outcome of 30-day mortality rate, and distinguished the 30-day mortality rate between urgent and elective late conversions. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Data on baseline demographics, indication for conversion, surgical approach, and early and late mortality rates were recorded. Reported data correspond to the average or range of the means reported in the individual studies. A random-effects model was used to pool 30-day mortality rates for urgent and elective late conversion. RESULTS: There were 27 retrospective studies with a total of 791 patients available for analysis, with 617 elective and 174 urgent late conversions. The methodologic quality was mostly poor (median, 6; interquartile range, 5-7). The mean time from primary EVAR to conversion was 35.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.4-39.8 months). The most commonly explanted endografts were Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) in 16.2%, Talent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) in 14.5%, and AneuRx (Medtronic) in 13.7%. Nineteen other types of endografts were used in 43.3%; the type of endograft was not reported in 12.3%. A transperitoneal approach was used in a mean 74.0% of conversions (95% CI, 70.9%-77.0%), and complete endograft explantation was performed in 478 (60.4%) patients (95% CI, 57.0%-63.8%). The complication rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 27.0%-46.4%). Temporary or permanent hemodialysis after conversion was required in 3.9% of patients (95% CI, 2.6%-5.2%). The pooled estimate for the 30-day mortality rate was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.0%; P = .726) for elective late conversions and 28.1% (95% CI, 18.9%-37.3%; P < .001) for urgent late conversions. CONCLUSIONS: Type I endoleak and rupture are the most common indications for, respectively, elective and urgent conversions. A 10 times higher 30-day mortality rate was observed for patients treated with late open conversion in an urgent vs elective setting. The 30-day mortality rate of elective late open conversions is almost comparable to that of primary elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair procedures. For the interpretation of the outcomes of the review, however, the methodologic quality of the available literature should be considered.