Pattern Recognition or Adnexal MR Scoring System: Which Is More Accurate in Evaluating Adnexal Lesions?

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system to evaluate adnexal lesions indeterminate on the US exam. METHODS: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, pelvic DCE-MRI of 245 patients with 340 adnexal masses was studied based on the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system. RESULTS: ADNEX MR scoring system with a sensitivity of 96.6% and specificity of 91% has an accuracy of 92.9%. The pattern recognition system's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are 95.8%, 93.3%, and 94.7%, respectively. PPV and NPV for the ADNEX MR scoring system were 85.1 and 98.1, respectively. PPV and NPV for the pattern recognition system were 89.7% and 97.7%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system is 0.938 (95% CI, 0.909-0.967) and 0.950 (95% CI, 0.922-0.977). Pairwise comparison of these AUCs showed no significant difference (p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: The pattern recognition system is less sensitive than the ADNEX MR scoring system, yet more specific.

O-RADS MRI scoring system has the potential to reduce the frequency of avoidable adnexal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential impact of the O-RADS MRI score on the decision-making process for the management of adnexal masses. METHODS: EURAD database (prospective, European observational, multicenter study) was queried to identify asymptomatic women without history of infertility included between March 1st and March 31st 2018, with available surgical pathology or clinical findings at 2-year clinical follow-up. Blinded to final diagnosis, we stratified patients into five categories according to the O-RADS MRI score (absent i.e. non adnexal, benign, probably benign, indeterminate, probably malignant). Prospective management was compared to theoretical management according to the score established as following: those with presumed benign masses (scored O-RADS MRI 2 or 3) (follow-up recommended) and those with presumed malignant masses (scored O-RADS MRI 4 or 5) (surgery recommended). RESULTS: The accuracy of the score for assessing the origin of the mass was of 97.2 % (564/580, CI95% 0.96-0.98) and was of 92.0 % (484/526) for categorizing lesions with a negative predictive value of 98.1 % (415/423, CI95% 0.96-0.99). Theoretical management using the score would have spared surgery in 229 patients (87.1 %, 229/263) with benign lesions and malignancy would have been missed in 6 borderline and 2 invasive cases. In patients with a presumed benign mass using O-RADS MRI score, recommending surgery for lesions >= 100 mm would miss only 4/77 (4.8 %) malignant adnexal tumors instead of 8 (50 % decrease). CONCLUSION: The use of O-RADS MRI scoring system could drastically reduce the number of asymptomatic patients undergoing avoidable surgery.

Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of subjective assessment and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal tumors and between metastatic and primary adnexal tumors in patients with a personal history of breast cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study including patients with a history of breast cancer who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass between 2013 and 2020. All patients had been examined with transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound using a standardized examination technique and all ultrasound reports had been stored and were retrieved for the purposes of this study. The specific diagnosis suggested by the original ultrasound examiner in the retrieved report was analyzed. For each mass, the ADNEX model risks were calculated prospectively and the highest relative risk was used to categorize each into one of five categories (benign, borderline, primary Stage I, primary Stages II-IV or metastatic ovarian cancer) for analysis of the ADNEX model in predicting the specific tumor type. The performance of subjective assessment and the ADNEX model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal tumors and between primary and metastatic adnexal tumors was evaluated, using final histology as the reference standard. RESULTS: Included in the study were 202 women with a history of breast cancer who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass. At histology, 93/202 (46.0%) masses were benign, 76/202 (37.6%) were primary malignancies (four borderline and 72 invasive tumors) and 33/202 (16.3%) were metastases. The original ultrasound examiner classified correctly 79/93 (84.9%) benign adnexal masses, 72/76 (94.7%) primary adnexal malignancies and 30/33 (90.9%) metastatic tumors. Subjective ultrasound evaluation had a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 84.9% and accuracy of 89.6%, while the ADNEX model had higher sensitivity (98.2%) but lower specificity (78.5%), with similar accuracy (89.1%), in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Subjective evaluation had a sensitivity of 51.5%, specificity of 88.8% and accuracy of 82.7% in distinguishing metastatic and primary tumors (including benign, borderline and invasive tumors), and the ADNEX model had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 84.6% and similar accuracy (81.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of subjective assessment and the ADNEX model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses in this series of patients with history of breast cancer was relatively similar. Both subjective assessment and the ADNEX model demonstrated good accuracy and specificity in discriminating between metastatic and primary tumors, but the sensitivity was low. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of Ovarian-adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), and to compare it with Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) model, Subjective Assessment (SA), and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses (AMs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ultrasound characteristics of 445 patients included in the study were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated using diagnostic models. The diagnostic performances of ultrasound diagnostic models were measured by assessing, receiver-operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, positive predictive values, positive likelihood ratios, specificities, negative predictive values, and negative likelihood ratios. Kappa values were used to evaluate inter-reviewer agreement (IRA). RESULTS: Of the 445 AMs, 265 were benign and 180 were malignant. The area under the curve (AUC) of O-RADS (0.941), ADNEX model (0.925), and SA (0.931) were higher than RMI (0.815) (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity of O-RADS (93.3%), ADNEX model (94.4%), and SA (96.1%) were higher than RMI (70.6%) (p > 0.05), and there was no statistical significance among them (p > 0.05). The specificity of O-RADS, ADNEX model, SA, and RMI was 90.2%, 90.6%, 90.2%, and 92.5%, respectively, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). All four ultrasound diagnostic methods showed better IRA. CONCLUSIONS: O-RADS, ADNEX model and SA have better diagnostic value in differentiating benign and malignant AMs than RMI.

Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.

OBJECTIVE: The accurate preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses, especially those with complex ultrasound morphology, remains a great challenge for junior sonographers. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram based on the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology. METHODS: A total of 243 patients with data on adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected to establish the training cohort, while 106 patients with data from January 2021 to December 2021 served as the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine independent risk factors for malignant tumors in the training cohort. Subsequently, a predictive nomogram model was developed and validated in the validation cohort. The calibration, discrimination, and clinical net benefit of the nomogram model were assessed separately by calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Finally, we compared this model to the O-RADS. RESULTS: The O-RADS category, an elevated CA125 level, acoustic shadowing and a papillary projection with color Doppler flow were the independent predictors and were incorporated into the nomogram model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomogram model was 0.958 (95% CI, 0.932-0.984) in the training cohort. The specificity and sensitivity were 0.939 and 0.893, respectively. This nomogram also showed good discrimination in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.940, 95% CI, 0.899-0.981), with a sensitivity of 0.915 and specificity of 0.797. In addition, the nomogram model showed good calibration efficiency in both the training and validation cohorts. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful. Furthermore, the nomogram model had higher AUC and net benefit than the O-RADS. CONCLUSION: The nomogram based on the O-RADS showed a good predictive ability for the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology and could provide help for junior sonographers.

Is the presence of deep infiltrative endometriosis underestimated in the surgical management of endometriosis?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the presence of deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) in the surgical management of endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Operation notes and histopathological reports of women with endometriosis were retrospectively analyzed in the Ege University Hospital between 2008 and 2018. A total of 191 women with suspicious of endometriosis but without clinical signs of DIE were enrolled in the study. Laparoscopic diagnosis of DIE was compared with histopathological reports. There was no histopathology before surgery. Endometriosis was suspected only based on symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 213 lesions that were thought to be DIE were removed from 191 women with endometriosis. Among these 213 lesions, 179 specimens were reported as endometriosis and 34 lesions as fibro-adipose tissue. Forty-nine right uterosacral ligaments were excised, and endometriosis was detected in 44 out of 49 specimens. Histopathological examination of 45 left uterosacral ligaments revealed endometriosis in 35 specimens. Finally, 25 endometriotic nodules were removed from the recto-vaginal space, and 22 of these were verified as endometriosis by a pathologist. The positive predictive value of laparoscopic visualization for DIE in the group suspected of endometriosis but without any clinical findings of DIE was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Women with the suspicious of endometriosis, qualified to surgery, because of infertility or pain, should be prudently investigated to confirm or to exclude coexistence of DIE even if no preoperative sign of DIE was observed to provide complete resection. Otherwise, DIE continues to grow, causes pain postoperatively, and complicates subsequent surgery.

Extramedullary haematopoiesis presenting as an adnexal mass in a patient with ß-thalassaemia.

Solid masses of the ovaries raise the suspicion of malignancy or metastasis and require histological diagnosis. Extramedullary haematopoesis (EMH) is a rare histological finding of a mass of the adnexa. The sonographic pattern of EMH has rarely been described in the literature. Transvaginal biopsy of EMH has not been reported in the literature. We present a case of adnexal EMH in a patient affected with ß-thalassaemia, and we performed a narrative review. Only in our case, the sonographic pattern was described, and a transvaginal ultrasound-guided core biopsy was used. Assessing patients' medical history and correlating it to the findings of diagnostic imaging is of paramount importance when evaluating patients with adnexal masses. The correct interpretation of sonographic images can avoid unnecessarily invasive procedures. A transvaginal biopsy could be a safe, easy and well-tolerated method to gain definite histological diagnosis in cases where a primary ovarian malignancy is not suspected.

Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the ability of the O-RADS and ADNEX models to classify benign or malignant adnexal lesions. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included women who underwent surgery for adnexal lesions. Two gynecologists independently categorized the adnexal lesions according to the O-RADS and ADNEX models. Four additional readers were included to validate the new quick-access O-RADS flowchart. RESULTS: Among the 322 patients included in this study, 264 (82.0%) had a benign diagnosis, and 58 (18.0%) had a malignant diagnosis. The malignant rates of O-RADS 2, O-RADS 3, O-RADS 4, and O-RADS 5 were 0%, 3.0%, 37.7%, and 78.9%, respectively. The AUC of the O-RADS in the 322 patients was 0.93. On comparing the O-RADS and ADNEX models in the remaining 281 patients, the AUCs of the O-RADS, ADNEX model with CA125, and ADNEX model without CA125 were 0.92, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. When setting a uniform cutoff of ≥ 10% (≥ O-RADS 4) to predict malignancy, the O-RADS had higher sensitivity than the ADNEX model (96.6% vs. 91.4%), and relatively similar specificity. In addition, the readers with the quick-access flowchart spent less time categorizing O-RADS than the readers with only the original O-RADS table (mean analysis time: 99 min 15 s vs. 111 min 55 s). CONCLUSIONS: The O-RADS classification of the adnexal lesions as benign or malignant was comparable to that of the ADNEX model and had higher sensitivity at the 10% cutoff value. A quick-access O-RADS flowchart was helpful in O-RADS categorization and might shorten the analysis time. KEY POINTS: • Both O-RADS and ADNEX models had good diagnostic performance in distinguishing adnexal malignancy, and O-RADS had higher sensitivity than ADNEX model in uniform 10% cutoff to predict malignancy. • Quick-access O-RADS flowchart was developed to help review O-RADS classification and might help reduce the analysis time.

Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We conducted a meta-analysis of IOTA (international ovarian tumor analysis) ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) as ultrasound system and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) ADNEX scoring systems as MR system to assess their diagnostic test accuracy for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses of the ovary. We performed an electronic search for relevant publications in the English language up to February 2021 using PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, and Google scholar databases and search engines. We computed the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC) using the statistical software STATA (Version 13, College Station, TX, StataCorp LP). Based on 11 studies using IOTA-ADNEX, we observed pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under curve, and diagnostic odds ratio were 96% (95% CI, 94% to 97%), 79% (95% CI, 70% to 86 %), 97% (95% CI, 95% to 98%), and 88 (95% CI, 43 to 180). Based on five studies using MR-ADNEX scoring system the pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under curve and diagnostic odds ratio were 91 % (95% CI, 87% to 94 %), 95% (95% CI, 92% to 97 %), 98% (95% CI, 96% to 99%), and 189 (95% CI, 90 to 396) respectively. Our meta-analysis results demonstrate that the MR-ADNEX scoring system had higher specificity however bit lower sensitivity compared to the IOTA-ADNEX scoring system for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian tumors.

Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China. METHODS: This was a single oncology centre, retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of 620 patients. All patients underwent surgery, and the histopathological diagnosis was used as a reference standard. The masses were divided into five types according to the ADNEX model: benign ovarian tumours, borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs), stage I ovarian cancer (OC), stage II-IV OC and ovarian metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the ADNEX model to classify tumours into different histological types with and without cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) results. RESULTS: Of the 620 women, 402 (64.8%) had a benign ovarian tumour and 218 (35.2%) had a malignant ovarian tumour, including 86 (13.9%) with BOT, 75 (12.1%) with stage I OC, 53 (8.5%) with stage II-IV OC and 4 (0.6%) with ovarian metastasis. The AUC of the model to differentiate benign and malignant adnexal masses was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98). Performance was excellent for the discrimination between benign and stage II-IV OC and between benign and ovarian metastasis, with AUCs of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. The model was less effective at distinguishing between BOT and stage I OC and between BOT and ovarian metastasis, with AUCs of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45-0.64) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.77), respectively. When including CA125 in the model, the performance in discriminating between stage II-IV OC and stage I OC and between stage II-IV OC ovarian metastasis was improved (AUC increased from 0.88 to 0.94, P = 0.01, and from 0.86 to 0.97, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The IOTA ADNEX model has excellent performance in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers with limited experience in China. In classifying different subtypes of ovarian cancers, the model has difficulty differentiating BOTs from stage I OC and BOTs from ovarian metastases.

Quantitative global lipidomics analysis of patients with ovarian cancer versus benign adnexal mass.

Altered lipid metabolism has emerged as an important feature of ovarian cancer (OC), yet the translational potential of lipid metabolites to aid in diagnosis and triage remains unproven. We conducted a multi-level interrogation of lipid metabolic phenotypes in patients with adnexal masses, integrating quantitative lipidomics profiling of plasma and ascites with publicly-available tumor transcriptome data. Using Sciex Lipidyzer, we assessed concentrations of > 500 plasma lipids in two patient cohorts-(i) a pilot set of 100 women with OC (50) or benign tumor (50), and (ii) an independent set of 118 women with malignant (60) or benign (58) adnexal mass. 249 lipid species and several lipid classes were significantly reduced in cases versus controls in both cohorts (FDR < 0.05). 23 metabolites-triacylglycerols, phosphatidylcholines, cholesterol esters-were validated at Bonferroni significance (P < 9.16 × 10-5). Certain lipids exhibited greater alterations in early- (diacylglycerols) or late-stage (lysophospholipids) cases, and multiple lipids in plasma and ascites were positively correlated. Lipoprotein receptor gene expression differed markedly in OC versus benign tumors. Importantly, several plasma lipid species, such as DAG(16:1/18:1), improved the accuracy of CA125 in differentiating early-stage OC cases from benign controls, and conferred a 15-20% increase in specificity at 90% sensitivity in multivariate models adjusted for age and BMI. This study provides novel insight into systemic and local lipid metabolic differences between OC and benign disease, further implicating altered lipid uptake in OC biology, and advancing plasma lipid metabolites as a complementary class of circulating biomarkers for OC diagnosis and triage.

Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing benign adnexal masses from malignant tumors plays an important role in preoperative planning and improving patients' survival rates. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group developed a model termed the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the ADNEX model in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors at a cutoff value of 10%. METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic study. 357 patients with an adnexal mass who were scheduled for surgery at Siriraj Hospital were included from May 1, 2018, to May 30, 2019. All patients were undergoing ultrasonography, and serum CA125 was measured. Data were calculated by the ADNEX model via an IOTA ADNEX calculator. RESULTS: Of the 357 patients, 296 had benign tumors and 61 had malignant tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for using the ADNEX model was 0.975 (95% confidence interval, 0.953-0.988). At a 10% cutoff, the sensitivity was 98.4% and specificity was 87.2%. The best cutoff value was at 16.6% in our population. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the ADNEX model in differentiating benign and malignant tumors was excellent.

Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.

The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat clinically T4 (cT4) colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain and deserves further investigation. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between September 2006 and March 2019 recruiting patients diagnosed as cT4 CRC and undergoing MIS at a university hospital and its branch. Patients' demography, clinicopathology, surgical and oncological outcomes, and radicality were analyzed. A total of 128 patients were recruited with an average follow-up period of 33.8 months. The median time to soft diet was 6 days, and the median postoperative hospitalization periods was 11 days. The conversion and complication (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II) rates were 7.8% and 27.3%, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 0.78%. R0 resection rate was 92.2% for cT4M0 and 88.6% for pT4M0 patients. For cT4 CRC patients, the disease-free survival and 3-year overall survival were 86.1% and 86.8% for stage II, 54.1% and 57.9% for stage III, and 10.8% and 17.8% for stage IV. With acceptable conversion, complication and mortality rate, MIS may achieve satisfactory R0 resection rate and thus lead to good oncological outcomes for selected patients with cT4 CRC.

Aplicación de un protocolo de manejo de masas anexiales: ahorro en actividad clínicamente innecesaria y costes / Application of a protocol for the management of adnexal masses: savings in clinically unnecessary activity and costs

FUNDAMENTO: Evaluar si la implantación de un protocolo de masas anexiales basado en el sistema GI-RADS permite un correcto manejo de estas, evitando la actividad clínicamente innecesaria derivada del sobrediagnóstico y sobretratamiento, así como un ahorro en los costes. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo (julio 2015 - junio 2017). Incluyó mujeres atendidas en la consulta de Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos (Móstoles, Madrid) con hallazgo de una masa anexial en ecografía de alta resolución. La masa anexial se catalogó con el sistema GI-RADS y, junto con la imagen ecográfica y el estatus menopáusico de la paciente, se decidió realizar cirugía o seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 154 mujeres, el 24 % con imágenes sospechosas de malignidad (G4 y G5). Se intervinieron un 33,1 % de las masas anexiales, el 33,3 % de las cuales fueron cáncer de ovario, principalmente en mujeres postmenopáusicas con una imagen ecográfica sospechosa de malignidad (88,2 %). Un 3,2 % de las pacientes rechazaron la indicación de cirugía. Durante el seguimiento desaparecieron el 21,4 % de las masas anexiales, 61 pacientes (39,6 %) no habían sido intervenidas por presentar una masa anexial estable, y dos (1,3 %) por el riesgo quirúrgico. Al final del estudio se evitaron 96 (62,3 %) cirugías, logrando una reducción de costes de 57.683 euros. CONCLUSIONES: La aplicación de un protocolo basado en el sistema de clasificación GI-RADS evitó cirugías innecesarias y las consecuencias y costes derivados de ellas, por lo que constituye una herramienta útil y práctica en el control y tratamiento de las masas anexiales.Palabras clave. Masa anexial. Clasificación GI-RADS. Cirugías innecesarias. Seguridad del paciente

BACKGROUND: Evaluate whether the implementation of an adnexal masses protocol, based on the GI-RADS system, allows a correct management of these masses, avoiding unnecessary clinical activity produced by overdiagnosis and overtreatment, as well as cost savings. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study (July 2015 - June 2017) including women treated at the Gynaecology clinic of the Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos (Móstoles, Madrid), with detection of an adnexal mass in high resolution echography. Adnexal masses were classified by the GI-RADS system, and together with the echographic image and menopausal status, surgery or follow-up was decided. RESULTS: A total of 154 women were studied, 24 % with images suggesting malignancy (G4 and G5). Surgery was performed on 33.1 % of adnexal masses; 33.3 % of them were ovarian carcinoma, mainly (88.2 %) in postmenopausal women with echographic images suggesting malignancy. Three point two percent of patients rejected the recommended surgery. During follow-up 21.4 % of the masses disappeared, 61 patients were only monitored due to a stable mass and two (1.3 %) due to surgical risk. Eventually, 96 (62.3 %) surgeries were avoided, achieving a 57,683 Euro saving. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a protocol based on the GI-RADS classification system avoided unnecessary surgeries, as well as the consequences and economical cost produced by them. Thus, this protocol is a useful and practical tool for the monitoring and treatment of adnexal masses

Imaging in gynecological disease (20): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. From the operative records of the eight participating gynecological ultrasound centers, we identified patients with a surgically confirmed diagnosis of adnexal torsion, defined as surgical evidence of ovarian pedicle, paraovarian cyst and/or Fallopian tube twisted on its own axis, who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination by an experienced examiner, between 2008 and 2018. Only cases with at least two available ultrasound images and/or videoclips (one grayscale and one with Doppler evaluation) were included. Clinical, ultrasound, surgical and histological information was retrieved from each patient's medical record and entered into an Excel file by the principal investigator at each center. In addition, two authors reviewed all available ultrasound images and videoclips of the twisted adnexa, with regard to the presence of four predefined ultrasound features reported to be characteristic of adnexal torsion: (1) ovarian stromal edema with or without peripherally displaced antral follicles, (2) the follicular ring sign, (3) the whirlpool sign and (4) absence of vascularization in the twisted organ. RESULTS: A total of 315 cases of adnexal torsion were identified. The median age of the patients was 30 (range, 1-88) years. Most patients were premenopausal (284/314; 90.4%) and presented with acute or subacute pelvic pain (305/315; 96.8%). The surgical approach was laparoscopic in 239/312 (76.6%) patients and conservative surgery (untwisting with or without excision of a lesion) was performed in 149/315 (47.3%) cases. According to the original ultrasound reports, the median largest diameter of the twisted organ was 83 (range, 30-349) mm. Free fluid in the pouch of Douglas was detected in 196/275 (71.3%) patients. Ovarian stromal edema with or without peripherally displaced antral follicles was reported in the original ultrasound report in 167/241 (69.3%) patients, the whirlpool sign in 178/226 (78.8%) patients, absent color Doppler signals in the twisted organ in 119/269 (44.2%) patients and the follicular ring sign in 51/134 (38.1%) patients. On retrospective review of images and videoclips, ovarian stromal edema with or without peripherally displaced antral follicles (201/254; 79.1%) and the whirlpool sign (139/153; 90.8%) were the most commonly detected features of adnexal torsion. CONCLUSION: Most patients with surgically confirmed adnexal torsion are of reproductive age and present with acute or subacute pain. Common ultrasound signs are an enlarged adnexa, the whirlpool sign, ovarian stromal edema with or without peripherally displaced antral follicles and free fluid in the pelvis. The follicular ring sign and absence of Doppler signals in the twisted organ are slightly less common signs. Recognizing ultrasound signs of adnexal torsion is important so that the correct treatment, i.e. surgery without delay, can be offered. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Smooth Muscle Tumors of the Visceral Adnexal and Uterine Ligaments and Adnexal Connective Tissue: A Clinicopathologic Study of 67 Cases.

The endopelvic fascia is a biomechanical network of supportive tissue that suspends and secures the female reproductive organs to the pelvic sidewall. Several visceral adnexal and uterine ligaments are part of this framework, and we have observed that smooth muscle tumors (SMTs) arising from these structures morphologically resemble gynecologic smooth muscle neoplasms. To determine whether gynecologic smooth muscle tumor criteria for malignancy are valid in these tumors, we evaluated the morphologic features of 67 tumors from 67 patients and correlated our findings with patient outcome. Using current uterine SMT WHO definitions, 57 tumors (85%) were classified as leiomyoma, 2 (3%) as smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), and 8 (12%) as leiomyosarcoma. Clinical follow-up was available for 88% of patients (range: 1-296 mo, mean: 174 mo, median: 79 mo). Only 1 case of leiomyosarcoma had metastasis at time of presentation, but 6 of 8 (75%) patients eventually died of disease. The other 2 cases of leiomyosarcoma that have not recurred are 11 and 16 mo from initial diagnosis. No cases of STUMP or leiomyoma recurred. On the basis of morphologic features and patient outcome, we believe these tumors distribute into similar categories of leiomyoma, STUMP and leiomyosarcoma, paralleling the biologic potential of uterine SMTs as well as SMTs of other gynecologic sites. We propose use of uterine WHO SMT criteria to classify spindled SMTs that arise in the visceral adnexal and uterine ligaments and adnexal connective tissue.

Female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin: morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 15 cases.

Female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin are rare and present a diagnostic challenge due to their morphological and immunohistochemical overlap with more common ovarian and broad ligament entities. We evaluated the morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 15 tumors of probable Wolffian origin. Patients ranged from 32 to 69 (mean 47) years and tumors from 1.8 to 30 (mean 10) cm. All except one arose in para-adnexal soft tissues. Follow-up was available for six patients, five of whom were alive and well, while the sixth, who had extra-adnexal disease at diagnosis, died from unrelated causes. The following patterns were noted: tubular (all tumors), solid 11/15 (73%), sieve-like 7/15 (47%), and reticular 1/15 (7%). A myxoid background was present in 3/15 (20%) of tumors and eosinophilic luminal secretions in 11/15 (73%). Most tumors (12/15, 80%) had low-grade nuclear atypia, while three showed foci with scattered high-grade atypia. Mitotic index ranged from 0 to 17 (mean 4) per ten high-power fields. Tumors were positive for pankeratin and negative for TTF-1. EMA, GATA3, and PAX8 were positive in 2/10 (20%; focal), 3/15 (20%; focal), and 1/15 (7%; focal) of tumors, respectively. CD10, SF-1, calretinin, inhibin, ER, PR, cytokeratin 7, and WT1 were variably expressed. Pathogenic mutations were rare and included STK11 (n = 3), APC (n = 1), and MBD4 (n = 1). Copy number variations were detected in the three tumors with STK11 mutations and a myxoid background. These data demonstrate that female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin are morphologically and immunohistochemically diverse, but infrequently harbor pathogenic mutations. However, their lack of mutations in contrast to their mimickers may be a valuable tool in diagnostically difficult cases.