Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 69(Suppl 2)(6): S57-S63, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369535

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Eczema, a chronic dermatologic disease, has been recognized as an economic burden in publications all over the word but only minimally as such in Vietnam. The aim of this prospective study was to quantify the financial hardships and impairments suffered by eczema patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional prevalence-based study involved 136 patients, whose conditions were classified into three severity levels on the basis of the medications that they were prescribed. Prescription therapy was administered for a month, after which there was patient-oriented assessment of effectiveness. The work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was used to evaluate productivity loss, which was expressed in percentage form. Bootstrapping was conducted to determine continuous variables and demographybased differences in cost values among the patient groups. RESULTS: For the month-long treatment, each eczema patient needed an average of US$68.1 (range: US$56.2- US$81.5) with the highest proportion being spent on cosmetic treatments. There is noticeable difference between groups among which patients' symptoms demonstrated in distinct levels. The estimates indicated that eczema resulted in 27.8% and 23.1% impairments in work and daily activities, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The aggravation of disease symptoms can increase the direct costs borne by eczema patients. A decrease in productivity, which is one of the most serious consequences of the condition, should be paid adequate attention to minimize burdens to society.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/economía , Eficiencia , Rendimiento Laboral/economía , Absentismo , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/economía , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Cosméticos/economía , Cosméticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Emolientes/economía , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cuidados de la Piel , Vietnam
3.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 22(12): 1426-1436, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27882840

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common condition that can be treated with a number of different therapies. Treatments such as intranasal antihistamines (INAs) and intranasal steroids (INSs) are widely used by AR patients. For some allergy sufferers, a combination of therapies, specifically an INA and an INS, is required to address their symptoms. A new treatment, the formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone pro-pionate used as a single spray (MP-AzeFlu), has become available for AR patients who need both types of treatment. In this regard, the comparison with the alternative concomitant use of INAs and INSs is of interest. The current study examines the health care resource utilization and costs for each cohort. OBJECTIVE: To examine the resource utilization and costs associated with AR for patients treated with MP-AzeFlu or concurrent therapy with single-ingredient INA and INS sprays (free-combination therapy). METHODS: A retrospective administrative claims study for commercially insured patients from a large U.S. health plan was performed. Patients with an AR diagnosis and a prescription claim for MP-AzeFlu or free-combination therapy between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2013, were identified. Patients were aged at least 12 years at index date (first prescription fill for intranasal therapy) and were required to have 12 months pre-index and 6 months post-index of continuous enrollment. Health care resource utilization and costs were assessed for the post-index period. The cohorts were adjusted on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics using inverse propensity treatment weights. Other covariates, prescriber specialty, product switching during the post-index period, and pre-index total costs were included in the regression models measuring outcomes. One clinical characteristic of interest was the presence of asthma as comorbidity. A subset analysis of AR patients with asthma was also performed. RESULTS: All-cause-related pharmacy fills as well as pharmacy, medical, and total costs were significantly reduced by using MP-AzeFlu (N = 810) instead of the free combination of drugs (N = 726). For AR-related health care resource utilization, the MP-AzeFlu cohort had significantly fewer pharmacy fills than the free-combination cohort (1.01 and 1.17, respectively; P < 0.001) with no significant difference in outpatient services and specialist visits (P = 0.139 and P = 0.117, respectively). Six-month AR-related pharmacy and total costs were significantly lower (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001) for the MP-AzeFlu cohort ($128 and $334, respectively) than the free-combination cohort ($268 and $458, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in AR-related medical costs between the 2 cohorts (P = 0.454). For the subcohort of AR patients with asthma, the MP-AzeFlu cohort had lower 6-month asthma resource utilization and costs than the free-combination cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, for AR patients needing INAs and INSs, the single-spray formulation MP-AzeFlu had better economic outcomes than for patients who rely on the free combination of these agents. MP-AzeFlu also appears to keep asthma-related utilization and costs down for those AR patients who also suffer from asthma. Potential explanations for these findings are explored. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Meda Pharmaceuticals. Authors were either employed by Meda Pharmaceuticals or received consulting fees from Meda Pharmaceuticals. Comprehensive Health Insights and Sedaghat received funding from Meda Pharmaceuticals as a consultant to participate in this study. Dufour and Caldwell-Tarr are employees of Comprehensive Health Insights. Harrow is currently employed by TESARO. This study was conceived by Harrow, Dufour, and Caldwell-Tarr. All authors contributed to the design of the study. Dufour took the lead in data collection, along with Caldwell-Tarr, and data interpretion was performed by Harrow, along with the other authors. Analyses were performed by Dufour. The manuscript was written and revised by all authors.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica/economía , Esteroides/economía , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Esteroides/administración & dosificación
4.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 26: 15082, 2016 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26845513

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis is a global illness with a well-recognised impact on quality of life and work performance. Comparatively little is known about the extent of its economic impact on society. The TOTALL study estimates the total cost of allergic rhinitis using a sample representing the entire Swedish population of working age. A questionnaire focused on allergic rhinitis was mailed out to a random population of Swedish residents, aged 18-65 years. Health-care contacts, medications, absenteeism (absence from work) and presenteeism (reduced working capacity at work) were assessed, and the direct and indirect costs of allergic rhinitis were calculated. Medication use was evaluated in relation to the ARIA guidelines. In all, 3,501 of 8,001 (44%) answered the questionnaire, and 855 (24%) of these reported allergic rhinitis. The mean annual direct and indirect costs because of allergic rhinitis were €210.3 and €750.8, respectively, resulting in a total cost of €961.1 per individual/year. Presenteeism represented 70% of the total cost. Antihistamines appear to be used in excess in relation to topical steroids, and the use of nasal decongestants was alarmingly high. The total cost of allergic rhinitis in Sweden, with a population of 9.5 million, was estimated at €1.3 billion annually. These unexpectedly high costs could be related to the high prevalence of disease, in combination with the previously often underestimated indirect costs. Improved adherence to guidelines might ease the economic burden on society.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Presentismo/economía , Rinitis Alérgica/economía , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Costo de Enfermedad , Desensibilización Inmunológica/economía , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descongestionantes Nasales/economía , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto Joven
6.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24027850

RESUMEN

The analysis of assortment of pharmaceuticals for treatment of psoriasis recommended by Minzdrav of Ukraine and present at the national pharmaceutical market is made. The characteristics of distribution of national and foreign producers of antihistamine and anti-psoriatic pharmaceuticals are established The availability of particular medicinal forms of various producers is analyzed too. The characteristics and tendencies in consumption of these groups of pharmaceuticals in natural and monetary units are analyzed including dynamics of changes of mean wholesale prices during the analyzed period.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Comercio/economía , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Humanos , Ucrania
7.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 25(4): 257-62, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21639996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem because of its increasing impact on economics, society, and the individual's quality of life. This study compares the outcomes and cost of three intranasal therapeutic approaches to the treatment of AR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using propensity scores to achieve balanced cohorts. The study population included patients ≥16 years of age with at least one intranasal prescription claim, without concurrent nasal polyps or sinusitis. Health care use and costs, airway infections, pharmacy costs, and indicators of unsatisfactory treatment (i.e., treatment augmentation or switching) were evaluated in the 1-year follow-up period using a claims database. RESULTS: Data from 141,190 patients in intranasal antihistamines (INA) therapy, intranasal steroids (INS) therapy, and intranasal combination therapy (ICT) cohorts were analyzed. The INA cohort showed the lowest rate of change in treatment (switching or augmentation). Switching rates were lowest in the INS therapy cohort, whereas augmentation was lowest in the INA cohort. AR- and asthma-related medication costs were significantly lower in the INA cohort. No differences were observed in airway infections and overall health care costs. Concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and asthma were the strongest predictors of health care cost and respiratory infection in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A change in treatment was noted in ∼⅓ of the entire study population. None of the treatments had a remarkable effect on health care costs or the occurrence of airway infections. The INA treatment cohort had lower AR- and asthma-related medication costs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/economía , Esteroides/economía , Administración Intranasal , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/fisiopatología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/fisiopatología , Esteroides/uso terapéutico
8.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 1(3): 229-34, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22287379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent consensus statements on the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) now require endoscopic or radiographic evidence of paranasal sinus inflammation. The timing of point-of-care (POC) computed tomography (CT) scan in the workup of these patients remains to be elucidated, particularly when endoscopy is negative. The objective of this research was to prospectively evaluate 2 algorithms for the initial management of patients with symptoms of CRS who manifest a normal nasal endoscopic examination. METHODS: A total of 40 such patients were randomized to 1 of 2 pathways: POC-CT at the initial visit followed by medical therapy based upon CT results (pre-CT group; n = 20), or empiric medical therapy (EMT) followed by POC posttreatment CT if symptoms persisted (EMT group; n = 20). RESULTS: The 2 groups were demographically and symptomatically similar with regard to 2003 Task Force major criteria. Otolaryngology follow-up was recommended in 11 of 20 pre-CT patients, all of whom (100%) returned. In contrast, only 10 of 20 EMT patients (50%) followed up as instructed (p < 0.05). Radiographic confirmation of CRS was found in 8 of 20 pre-CT patients, and only 2 of 9 patients after EMT (p = 0.61). EMT patients received more antibiotic prescriptions (relative ratio [RR], 2.50; 95% CI, 1.46-4.27), while pre-CT patients received more CT scans (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.37-3.61). Overall prescriptions costs were similar to the EMT group ($253 vs $218; p = 0.37) and the overall number of otolaryngology visits was similar. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptoms of CRS but negative endoscopy, POC at initial presentation results in substantially less unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and significantly greater compliance with otolaryngology care but does result in a higher utilization of radiographic imaging.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Rinitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinusitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Corticoesteroides/economía , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Endoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/economía , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Honorarios por Prescripción de Medicamentos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/economía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/economía , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/economía
9.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 36(7): 1125-9, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19620801

RESUMEN

Oxaliplatin therapy is a standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and oxaliplatin hypersensitivity is one of its side effects that should be particularly considered. In the present study, we observed a decrease in the incidence of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity since the introduction of preliminary medication involving the administration of escalated doses of steroids and the use of antihistamine agents. From the medical economics perspective, although the costs of the preliminary medication were generated, those for the treatment of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity, which were higher than the total cost of the preliminary medication, needed to be generated for all patients. Introduction of preliminary medication decreased the overall cost, since the medication decreased the incidence of hypersensitivity. Therefore, preliminary medication was recognized to be effective from the perspective of medical economics. The preliminary medication we introduced contributed to a safe, cost-effective, and high-quality treatment for advanced colorectal cancer by preventing oxaliplatin hypersensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/prevención & control , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Atención Ambulatoria , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Humanos , Oxaliplatino , Premedicación/economía , Esteroides/administración & dosificación
11.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 36(9): 333-6, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15633370

RESUMEN

AIMS: To measure evolution and cost consumption of anti-allergic medicines during ragweed pollen-period, geographic trend in the locations of anti-allergic consumers. Ragweed is highly spread in Rhone Alps. METHODS: We measured the ratio: number of boxes of anti-allergic medicines per one thousand patients between 6 and 64 years, refunded by twelve local health offices in the Rhone Alps area. We obtained statistical mapping for consumers of triamcinolone, we analysed in the relation to weakly ragweed pollen figures. RESULTS: Four geographic areas showed high increases of antihistaminic consumption from the middle of august to the end of september during the four years studied. A threefold increase of consumption of antihistaminic medicines, anti-allergic eye-drops and anti-allergic nasals topics was observed during ragweed pollen-period (week 33 to week 40). Antihistaminic consumption ratios increased in relation with ragweed pollen-period This study demonstrated that the anti-allergic medicines consumption reflected the image of ragweed allergy. This sanitary feature is easily obtained from the refunded databases of Medical Insurance.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Ambrosia/efectos adversos , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Polen/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/análisis , Antialérgicos/economía , Niño , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/economía , Estaciones del Año , Triamcinolona/administración & dosificación , Triamcinolona/economía , Triamcinolona/uso terapéutico
12.
Vaccine ; 21(23): 3236-9, 2003 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12804853

RESUMEN

The epidemiology and burden of varicella was assessed through the prospective study of 683 children under 15 years, by 58 primary care paediatricians working on seven autonomous communities of Spain. The mean age was 4.5+/-2.7 years, and 566 (83%) were secondary cases. There were 111 complications in 101 children (14.8%), skin superinfection being the most frequent (8.9%), followed by respiratory tract (4.5%) and eye (2.2%) infections. The mean number of visits to the paediatric clinic was 1.42 (95% C.I. 1.37-1.47), and 5.6% of the children were attended in the emergency department of a hospital previously. All children had at least one prescription, being antihistamines and antipyretics the most prescribed. Thirteen percent received systemic antibiotics and 11% acyclovir. Children were mainly cared by grandparents, and parents were off work for a mean of 0.97 days (1.61 if children under 5 years attended day-care facilities; 0.51 if they did not). Costs derived from medical attention totalled 32.5, and social indirect costs were 63.77.


Asunto(s)
Varicela/economía , Varicela/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Varicela/terapia , Niño , Cuidado del Niño/economía , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
14.
Am Fam Physician ; 52(2): 593-600, 1995 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7625332

RESUMEN

Several pharmacologic agents provide antihistamine effects by acting at the H1 histamine receptor site. The classic agents are relatively nonselective, resulting in a wide range of effects, both therapeutic and undesirable. The newer agents preferentially block peripheral H1 receptor sites and, consequently, have fewer side effects, including sedation. Antihistamines are useful in the treatment of allergic conditions, Parkinson's disease, insomnia and some forms of nausea, and provide symptomatic relief of cough and other conditions associated with respiratory tract infections. Certain agents may play a role in the treatment of asthma and anorexia. Selection of a specific agent should be based on cost and the minimization of side effects. The classic antihistamines provide an inexpensive and highly effective means of treating histamine-mediated symptoms. The bothersome central nervous system side effects can be alleviated by taking the drugs at bedtime; their prolonged tissue half-life allows dosing once or twice a day for 24-hour clinical relief. The newer, more expensive nonsedating antihistamines are acceptable alternatives for patients who are incapable of tolerating the effects of classic agents.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...