Considerations for Use of Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Support Biosimilar Development - (I) A Randomized Trial with PCSK9 Inhibitors.

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance outlines how biosimilars can be developed based on pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity study data in lieu of a comparative clinical efficacy study. There is a paucity of PD comparability studies in biosimilar development, leaving open questions about how best to plan these studies. To that end, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-arm clinical study in healthy participants to evaluate approaches to address information gaps, inform analysis best practices, and apply emerging technologies in biomarker characterization. Seventy-two healthy participants (n = 8 per arm) received either placebo or one of four doses of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab (15-100 mg) or evolocumab (21-140 mg) to evaluate the maximum change from baseline (ΔPDmax ) and the baseline-adjusted area under the effect curve (AUEC) for the biomarkers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) in serum. We investigated approaches to minimize variability in PD measures. Coefficient of variation was lower for LDL-C than apoB at therapeutic doses. Modeling and simulation were used to establish the dose-response relationship and provided support that therapeutic doses for these products are adequately sensitive and are on the steep part of the dose-response curves. Similar dose-response relationships were observed for both biomarkers. ΔPDmax plateaued at lower doses than AUEC. In summary, this study illustrates how pilot study data can be leveraged to inform appropriate dosing and data analyses for a PK and PD similarity study.

Investigation of the discriminatory ability of analytes for the bioequivalence assessment of ezetimibe: Parent drug, metabolite, total form, and combination of parent drug and total form.

The analysis of parent drug is usually the design of choice for a bioequivalence (BE) study. However, there is a controversy regarding the choice of analytes between EMA and USFDA for the BE study of ezetimibe (EZE). The EMA recommends measuring the total form alone, that means the sum of the concentration of "parent" EZE and "metabolite" ezetimibe-glucuronide (EZEG), as the BE determination. On the other hand, the USFDA recommends measuring not only total form but also EZE. The aim of this study was to employ a simulation approach to determine which analyte (e.g., EZE alone, EZEG alone, total form alone, or combination of EZE and total form) was more appropriate for use as a BE indicator. The previously published pharmacokinetic model of EZE and EZEG with enterohepatic circulation was used to generate virtual BE studies. Eight different scenarios were performed with changes in the rate of absorption of EZE and EZEG. Five hundred virtual BE studies were generated for each scenario. In addition, the discriminatory ability of selected analytes for detecting differences in the rate of absorption of EZE and EZEG was evaluated based on power curve performance. The results obtained through simulations indicated that none of the single analytes (EZE alone, EZEG alone, and total form alone) could have clear advantages in terms of discriminatory ability. Therefore, it was recommended that a combination of EZE and total form should be used in the BE assessment.

Discovery of Novel 3-Piperidinyl Pyridine Derivatives as Highly Potent and Selective Cholesterol 24-Hydroxylase (CH24H) Inhibitors.

Cholesterol 24-hydroxylase (CH24H or CYP46A1) is a brain-specific cytochrome P450 enzyme that metabolizes cholesterol into 24S-hydroxycholesterol (24HC) for regulating brain cholesterol homeostasis. For the development of a novel and potent CH24H inhibitor, we designed and synthesized 3,4-disubstituted pyridine derivatives using a structure-based drug design approach starting from compounds 1 (soticlestat) and 2 (thioperamide). Optimization of this series by focusing on ligand-lipophilicity efficiency value resulted in the discovery of 4-(4-methyl-1-pyrazolyl)pyridine derivative 17 (IC50 = 8.5 nM) as a potent and highly selective CH24H inhibitor. The X-ray crystal structure of CH24H in complex with compound 17 revealed a unique binding mode. Both blood-brain barrier penetration and reduction of 24HC levels (26% reduction) in the mouse brain were confirmed by oral administration of 17 at 30 mg/kg, indicating that 17 is a promising tool for the novel and selective inhibition of CH24H.

Impact of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics of transporter probe substrates using a cocktail approach.

INTRODUCTION: Fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 2, and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1 and MATE2-K in vitro. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin (P-gp substrate), rosuvastatin (OATP1B1/1B3 and BCRP substrate), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2-K substrate). METHODS: In this nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, open-label study, 24 healthy adult participants received single oral doses of digoxin 0.25 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, and metformin 1000 mg administered as a drug cocktail (day 1, period 1). After a 6-day washout, participants received oral fedratinib 600 mg 1 h before the cocktail on day 7 (period 2). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to determine possible influences of fedratinib on the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin. RESULTS: Plasma exposure to the three probe drugs was generally comparable in the presence or absence of fedratinib. Reduced metformin renal clearance by 36% and slightly higher plasma glucose levels after OGTT were observed in the presence of fedratinib. Single oral doses of the cocktail ± fedratinib were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fedratinib has minimal impact on the exposure of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1/1B3, OCT2, and MATE1/2-K substrates. Since renal clearance of metformin was decreased in the presence of fedratinib, caution should be exercised in using coadministered drugs that are renally excreted via OCT2 and MATEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04231435 on January 18, 2020.

Invention of MK-8262, a Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibitor Backup to Anacetrapib with Best-in-Class Properties.

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) represents one of the key regulators of the homeostasis of lipid particles, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Epidemiological evidence correlates increased HDL and decreased LDL to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction. This relationship is consistent with a clinical outcomes trial of a CETP inhibitor (anacetrapib) combined with standard of care (statin), which led to a 9% additional risk reduction compared to standard of care alone. We discuss here the discovery of MK-8262, a CETP inhibitor with the potential for being the best-in-class molecule. Novel in vitro and in vivo paradigms were integrated to drug discovery to guide optimization informed by a critical understanding of key clinical adverse effect profiles. We present preclinical and clinical evidence of MK-8262 safety and efficacy by means of HDL increase and LDL reduction as biomarkers for reduced CHD risk.

Statins significantly repress rotavirus replication through downregulation of cholesterol synthesis.

Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe diarrhea among infants and young children and is responsible for more than 200,000 pediatric deaths per year. There is currently no pharmacological treatment for rotavirus infection in clinical activity. Although cholesterol synthesis has been proven to play a key role in the infections of multiple viruses, little is known about the relationship between cholesterol biosynthesis and rotavirus replication. The models of rotavirus infected two cell lines and a human small intestinal organoid were used. We investigated the effects of cholesterol biosynthesis, including inhibition, enhancement, and their combinations on rotavirus replication on these models. The knockdown of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) was built by small hairpin RNAs in Caco2 cells. In all these models, inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by statins or HMGCR knockdown had a significant inhibitory effect on rotavirus replication. The result was further confirmed by the other inhibitors: 6-fluoromevalonate, Zaragozic acid A and U18666A, in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. Conversely, enhancement of cholesterol production increased rotavirus replication, suggesting that cholesterol homeostasis is relevant for rotavirus replication. The effects of all these compounds toward rotavirus were further confirmed with a clinical rotavirus isolate. We concluded that rotavirus replication is dependent on cholesterol biosynthesis. To be specific, inhibition of cholesterol synthesis can downregulate rotavirus replication; on the contrary, rotavirus replication is upregulated. Statin treatment is potentially an effective novel clinical anti-rotavirus strategy.

Effect of Upadacitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin or Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

This phase 1, 2-part, 2-period, open-label, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between upadacitinib and rosuvastatin, an organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and breast cancer resistance protein substrate, or atorvastatin, a cytochrome P450 3A, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrate, in 36 healthy volunteers. During period 1, a single dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg; part 1) or atorvastatin (10 mg; part 2) was administered on day 1, followed by a washout period of 5 days. During period 2, once-daily doses of upadacitinib extended-release (30 mg) were administered on days 1 to 10, and a single dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg; part 1) or atorvastatin (10 mg; part 2) was administered 1 hour after the upadacitinib dose on day 7. Serial blood samples were collected for assays of drug concentrations. In Part 1, rosuvastatin maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf ) were 23% and 33% lower, respectively, when administered with upadacitinib relative to when administered alone. In part 2, atorvastatin Cmax and AUCinf was 11% and 23% lower, respectively, when administered with upadacitinib relative to when administered alone. The Cmax and AUCinf of the active metabolite ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin remained unchanged. Administration of a single 5-mg dose of rosuvastatin or a single 10-mg dose of atorvastatin had no relevant effect on upadacitinib Cmax or area under the plasma concentration-time curve. These results demonstrated that upadacitinib has no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin or on substrates transported by OATP1B or breast cancer resistance protein.

Co-administration of CSL112 (apolipoprotein A-I [human]) with atorvastatin and alirocumab is not associated with increased hepatotoxic or toxicokinetic effects in rats.

CSL112 (apolipoprotein A-I, apo AI [human]) is an investigational drug in Phase 3 development for risk reduction of early recurrent cardiovascular events following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although CSL112 is known to be well tolerated with a regimen of four weekly 6 g intravenous infusions after AMI, high doses of reconstituted apo AI preparations can transiently elevate liver enzymes in rats, raising the possibility of additive liver toxicity and toxicokinetic (TK) effects upon co-administration with cholesterol-lowering drugs, i.e., HMG-CoA reductase and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. We performed a toxicity and TK study in CD rats assigned to eleven treatment groups, including two dose levels of intravenous (IV) CSL112 (140 mg/kg, low-dose; 600 mg/kg, high-dose) administered as a single dose, alone or with intravenous alirocumab 50 mg/kg/week and/or oral atorvastatin 10 mg/kg/day. In addition, control groups of atorvastatin and alirocumab alone and in combination were investigated. Results showed some liver enzyme elevations (remaining <2-fold of baseline) related to administration of CSL112 alone. There was limited evidence of an additive effect of CSL112 on liver enzymes when combined, at either dose level, with alirocumab and/or atorvastatin, and histology revealed no evidence of an increased incidence or severity of hepatocyte vacuolation compared to the control treatments. Co-administration of the study drugs had minimal effect on their respective exposure levels, and on levels of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These data support concomitant use of CSL112 with alirocumab and/or atorvastatin with no anticipated negative impact on liver safety and TK.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in healthy male Egyptian volunteers.

PURPOSE: Comorbid conditions of heart and liver disorders added to HCV-induced hepatic steatosis make co-administration of statins, and direct-acting antivirals is common in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL" with rationalization to the underlying mechanism. METHODS: A randomized, three-phase crossover study that involves 12 healthy volunteers was performed. Participants received a single-dose of atorvastatin 80 mg alone, atorvastatin 80-mg plus tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for atorvastatin, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007," and their pharmacokinetics parameters were determined. RESULTS: Compared to atorvastatin alone, the administration of FDCSL caused a significant increase in both areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of atorvastatin by 65.5% and 156.0%, respectively. Also, atorvastatin caused a significant increase in the AUC0-∞ and Cmax of sofosbuvir by 32.0% and 11.0%, respectively. Similarly, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of sofosbuvir metabolite significantly increased by 84.0% and 74.0%, respectively. However, ledipasvir AUC0-∞ showed no significant change after atorvastatin intake. The elimination rate in all drugs revealed no significant changes. CONCLUSION: After concurrent administration of FDCSL with atorvastatin, the AUC0-∞ of both atorvastatin and sofosbuvir were increased. Caution should be taken with close monitoring for possible side effects after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Ezetimibe, Rosuvastatin, and Telmisartan.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions among rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and telmisartan, a randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects. Subjects received one of the following treatments once daily for 7 days in each period with a 1-week washout: a fixed-dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg, telmisartan 80 mg, combination therapy of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg, or telmisartan 80 mg. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdose at steady state. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the combination therapy to monotherapy for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,ss ), and the area under the time-concentration curve within a dosing interval at steady state (AUCtau,ss ) were estimated. Among the 36 randomized subjects, 31 subjects completed the study. The GMRs and 90%CIs of Cmax,ss and AUCtau,ss of total ezetimibe were not significantly altered. The Cmax,ss of free ezetimibe was increased (GMR, 1.85; 90%CI, 1.56-2.19) but not for the AUCtau,ss (GMR, 1.16; 90%CI, 1.06-1.26). Similarly, the Cmax,ss of rosuvastatin was increased (GMR, 2.13; 90%CI, 1.88-2.43) without a change in the AUCtau,ss (GMR, 1.09; 90%CI, 1.03-1.15). The Cmax,ss (GMR, 1.16; 90%CI, 1.01-1.32) and AUCtau,ss (GMR, 1.26; 90%CI, 1.17-1.37) of telmisartan were slightly increased. Considering the therapeutic range of the components, the interaction would have limited clinical impact.

Mechanistic Considerations About an Unexpected Ramipril Drug-Drug Interaction in the Development of a Triple Fixed-Dose Combination Product Containing Ramipril, Amlodipine, and Atorvastatin.

This open-label, repeat-dose, fixed-sequence study in healthy subjects examined pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between the components of a novel fixed-dose combination product containing ramipril, amlodipine, and atorvastatin. Sequential 5-day monotreatments (MTs) of ramipril (5 mg/d) and atorvastatin (40 mg/d) were followed by a 9-day amlodipine MT (5 mg/d), separated by 96 hours washout intervals. After amlodipine MT, all 3 single-entity drugs were coadministered for 5 days. Blood samples were taken over the dosing intervals and drug concentrations quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed and compared between the MTs and combination treatments by analysis of variance. Eighteen healthy subjects were enrolled and completed the study. No significant difference in maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-τ ) for amlodipine and AUC0-τ of atorvastatin was observed upon combination treatments versus MTs. Cmax of atorvastatin was slightly decreased (Cmax ratio, 89.3%) when given in combination. Increased exposure of ramipril and less pronounced exposure of ramiprilat were observed in the presence of amlodipine and atorvastatin, with Cmax ratios for ramipril and ramiprilat of 182.6% and 155.9%, and corresponding AUC0-τ ratios of 150.0% and 112.1%, respectively. These ramiprilat increases are unlikely of clinical relevance, because complete angiotensin-converting enzyme occupation is achieved with ≥5-mg ramipril doses, and free ramiprilat is rapidly eliminated. As ramipril is known to be subject to a site-dependent absorption in the upper small intestine, it is hypothesized that slowing of intestinal motility by atorvastatin or amlodipine or a combined effect of both, increased the residence time of ramipril in its "absorption window," thereby enhancing its bioavailability.

The influence of multiple oral administration on the pharmacokinetics and distribution profile of dalcetrapib in rats.

We investigated the influence of multiple oral administration on the accumulation of dalcetrapib (JTT-705/RO4607381), a novel cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, in rats. It is well known that orally administered dalcetrapib is rapidly hydrolysed to its active form, which has a sulfhydryl group, in the body. The active form then binds covalently to endogenous thiols via mixed disulfide bonds. Following multiple once daily oral administration of 14C-dalcetrapib for seven days to rats, the concentration of radioactivity in the plasma and almost all tissues reached the steady state by day 4. At 24 h after the last dose, there was a relatively high concentration of radioactivity in the mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, adrenal glands and fat. After the last dose to rats, the radioactivity was almost completely recovered in the urine and faeces, indicating that dalcetrapib is not retained in the body, probably due to the reversibility of the disulfide bonds despite being covalent bonds.

Effects of Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Sub-Analysis of PRECISE-IVUS Trial.

AIM: Coronary plaque regression is weak in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We evaluated whether dual lipid-lowering therapy (DLLT) with ezetimibe and atorvastatin attenuates coronary plaques in ACS patients with DM. METHODS: The prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS (Plaque Regression with Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound) trial assigned 246 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to DLLT or atorvastatin monotherapy and evaluated IVUS-derived changes in percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV), at baseline and 9-12-month follow-up, in 126 ACS cases, including 25 DM patients. The atorvastatin dose was up-titrated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ＜70 mg/dL. RESULTS: In DM patients, the monotherapy group (n=13) and the DLLT group (n=12) showed a similar prevalence of coronary risks and baseline lipid profiles. During the study, the change in LDL-C level was similar between DM and non-DM patients. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients showed weaker regression of ΔPAV by DLLT than those who underwent monotherapy (DM: -2.77±3.47% vs. -0.77±2.51%, P=0.11; non-DM: -2.01±3.36% vs. -0.08±2.66%, P=0.008). The change in LDL-C level was not correlated with ΔPAV in non-DM patients, but there was significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients (r=0.52, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients with DM showed weaker coronary plaque regression than their counterparts. A significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients suggested that more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is required in ACS patients with DM.

Development of One Pot Strategy for Hyper Production and In Vivo Evaluation of Lovastatin.

The aim of this project was to improve the Aspergillus terreus strain and pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse as carrier substrate for bulk production of lovastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug, in solid state fermentation. Sugarcane bagasse was treated with alkali (1-3% NaOH) for the conversion of complex polysaccharides into simple sugars for better utilization of carrier substrate by microorganism for maximum lovastatin production. Ethidium bromide (time of exposure 30-180 min) was used to induce mutation in Aspergillus terreus and the best mutant was selected on the basis of inhibition zone appeared on petri plates. Fermented lovastatin was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. The fermented lovastatin, produced by parent and mutant Aspergillus terreus strain, was checked on body weight, blood glucose and serum cholesterol, ALT, AST, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and TC levels of rats for their cholesterol lowering capacity. Our results indicate that selected strain along with 2% NaOH treated sugar cane bagasse was best suitable for bulk production of lovastatin by fermentation and fermented lovastatin effectively lower the cholesterol level of rats.

An update on PCSK9 inhibitors- pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: While atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is affecting growing numbers of patients, lipid-lowering therapies have been continuously improving to achieve prevention of cardiovascular events. Thus, the appearance of a novel therapeutic class, PCSK9 inhibitors, has raised both high expectations as well as concern over possible adverse effects. AREAS COVERED: This current review aims to analyze adverse events of special interest linked to PCSK9 inhibitors and give recommendations regarding further conduct when dealing with patients on this therapy. The most stringent adverse effect, neurocognitive impairment has been investigated in several studies, concluding that PCSK9 inhibitors neither improved nor worsened cognitive function. While new onset diabetes mellitus has also been a cause of concern due to its possible association with lipid lowering therapies, studies conducted so far have dispelled this possibility by showing that PCSK9 inhibitors do not increase this risk. Also, statin-associated muscle symptoms have not been proven to arise after the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, even in statin-intolerant patients. EXPERT OPINION: In conclusion, it can be safely stated that so far, no compelling evidence links PCSK9 inhibitors to these adverse events; however, long-term trials are always welcome to further assess potential adverse effects.

The inhibition of hepatic Pxr-Oatp2 pathway mediating decreased hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin in rats with high-fat diet-induced obesity.

PURPOSE: Obesity affecting drug pharmacokinetics results in the risk of the therapeutic failure or toxic side effects of drugs increasing. Unfortunately, the pharmacokinetic data in obese patients still lack for majority of drugs. Therefore, our study principally investigated the effect of obesity induced by high fat-diet (HFD) on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and explored the underlying mechanism via the hepatic pregnane X receptor (Pxr)- organic anion transporting polypeptide 2 (Oatp2) signaling pathway and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) in rats. MAIN METHODS: Rats with obesity was induced by HFD for 4 weeks, and subsequently, the effect of obesity on the blood concentration, pharmacokinetic parameters and biliary excretion of rosuvastatin administrated intravenously and the hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin in the rat primary hepatocytes were evaluated. Additionally, in order to illuminate the underlying mechanism, the alterations of the mRNA expressions of Oatp2, Mrp2 and Pxr and the concentrations of lithocholic acid (LCA), glycine-LCA (GLCA) and taurine-LCA (TLCA) in liver were determined. KEY FINDINGS: The blood concentration of rosuvastatin that has great relationship with the muscle toxicity increased in rats with HFD-induced obesity, which could be principally ascribed to the decreased hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin that was mainly resulted from the inhibition of hepatic Pxr-Oatp2 pathway. SIGNIFICANCE: The decreased hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin causing the increase of the rosuvastatin concentration in blood under the condition of HFD-induced obesity provides a cue for clinicians to reduce the rosuvastatin dose for obese patients to avoid the occurrence risk of the muscle toxicity of rosuvastatin.

Preparation of phytosteryl ornithine ester hydrochloride and improvement of its bioaccessibility and cholesterol-reducing activity in vitro.

In this work, synthesis of phytosteryl ornithine ester hydrochloride was studied for the first time using an intermediate phytosteryl N,N'-bis[tert-butoloxycarbonyl(BOC)]-ornithine ester. This method also involved esterification of phytosterols with N,N'-bis(BOC)-ornithine and deprotection. The maximum yield was 90% and deprotection of BOC group was more than 99% using the HCl/ethyl acetate method. As a result, thermal stability and water solubility as well as emulsifying activity and stability of phytosterols were improved through coupling with ornithine, which is favorable for their application in water-based food systems. We also observed increased bioaccessibility of phytosteryl ornithine hydrochloride (4.5%) and 65% of phytosteryl ornithine hydrochloride was hydrolyzed in vitro. These results indicated that ornithine phytosteryl ester hydrochloride can reduce dissolution capacity of cholesterol in vitro, representing improved cholesterol-reducing activity, which will further expand the applications of phytosteryl ornithine ester hydrochloride.

Effects of Multiple-Dose Administration of Aprocitentan on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin.

Aprocitentan is an investigational, orally active, dual, endothelin receptor antagonist that targets a novel pathway in the treatment of difficult-to-control (resistant) hypertension. The drug-drug interaction potential of aprocitentan on the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporter substrate rosuvastatin was investigated in this single-center, open-label, single-sequence study. Twenty healthy male subjects received a single dose of 10-mg rosuvastatin on days 1 and 13 followed by pharmacokinetic and tolerability assessments for up to 120 hours. From day 5 to day 17, subjects received 25 mg of aprocitentan once daily. Seventeen of 20 enrolled subjects completed the treatment. At steady state, aprocitentan did not affect the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in a clinically relevant way. The maximum plasma concentration was increased by 40% with a 90% confidence interval of 1.19 to 1.65. However, the ratio of the geometric means for both area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity was close to 1 with the 90% confidence interval within a reference interval of 0.80 to 1.25. Adverse events leading to study discontinuation were reported in 2 subjects. Overall, the combination of rosuvastatin and aprocitentan was well tolerated. Based on these data, aprocitentan does not affect BCRP and can be administered concomitantly with drugs dependent on BCRP transport.

Pharmacokinetics of current and emerging treatments for hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction: Reduction of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins reduces cardiovascular (CV) events and greater reductions have greater benefits. Current lipid treatments cannot always achieve desirable LDL-C targets and additional or alternative treatments are often needed.Areas covered: In this article, we review the pharmacokinetics of the available and emerging treatments for hypercholesterolemia and focus on recently approved drugs and those at a late stage of development.Expert opinion: Statin pharmacokinetics are well known and appropriate drugs and doses can usually be chosen for individual patients to achieve LDL-C targets and avoid adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Ezetimibe, icosapent ethyl and the monoclonal antibodies evolocumab and alirocumab have established efficacy and safety. Newer oral agents including pemafibrate and bempedoic acid have generally favorable pharmacokinetics supporting use in a wide range of patients. RNA-based therapies with antisense oligonucleotides are highly specific for their targets and those inhibiting apoB, apoCIII, angiopoietin-like protein 3 and lipoprotein(a) have shown promising results. The small-interfering RNA inclisiran has the notable advantage that a single subcutaneous administration may be effective for up to 6 months. The CV outcome trial results and long term safety data are eagerly awaited for these new agents.

Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol.

BACKGROUND: Inclisiran inhibits hepatic synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9. Previous studies suggest that inclisiran might provide sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with infrequent dosing. METHODS: We enrolled patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ORION-10 trial) and patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk equivalent (ORION-11 trial) who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels despite receiving statin therapy at the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran (284 mg) or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter over a period of 540 days. The coprimary end points in each trial were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline after day 90 and up to day 540. RESULTS: A total of 1561 and 1617 patients underwent randomization in the ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials, respectively. Mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol levels at baseline were 104.7±38.3 mg per deciliter (2.71±0.99 mmol per liter) and 105.5±39.1 mg per deciliter (2.73±1.01 mmol per liter), respectively. At day 510, inclisiran reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 52.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8 to 55.7) in the ORION-10 trial and by 49.9% (95% CI, 46.6 to 53.1) in the ORION-11 trial, with corresponding time-adjusted reductions of 53.8% (95% CI, 51.3 to 56.2) and 49.2% (95% CI, 46.8 to 51.6) (P<0.001 for all comparisons vs. placebo). Adverse events were generally similar in the inclisiran and placebo groups in each trial, although injection-site adverse events were more frequent with inclisiran than with placebo (2.6% vs. 0.9% in the ORION-10 trial and 4.7% vs. 0.5% in the ORION-11 trial); such reactions were generally mild, and none were severe or persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in LDL cholesterol levels of approximately 50% were obtained with inclisiran, administered subcutaneously every 6 months. More injection-site adverse events occurred with inclisiran than with placebo. (Funded by the Medicines Company; ORION-10 and ORION-11 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03399370 and NCT03400800.).