Impacts of cachexia progression in addition to serum IgG and blood lymphocytes on serum nivolumab in advanced cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Serum nivolumab concentrations exhibit a large variation in cancer patients. Cancer cachexia inducing systemic inflammation promotes the elimination of endogenous proteins, while its association with serum nivolumab remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the impacts of cachexia progression in addition to blood components on serum nivolumab in cancer patients. METHODS: Thirty-eight non-small-cell lung cancer or renal cell cancer patients receiving biweekly intravenous nivolumab were enrolled. Blood samples were collected just before dosing at the 7th administration of nivolumab or later. Serum nivolumab together with serum proteins, inflammatory markers, and peripheral blood leukocytes were determined. Cancer cachexia was classified using the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were monitored during the study period. RESULTS: Cancer patients had a large variation in serum nivolumab concentrations (interquartile range, 12-21 µg/mL per mg/kg). The serum nivolumab concentration was positively correlated with serum albumin, while negatively associated with serum globulin and immunoglobulin G (IgG). A negative correlation was observed between serum nivolumab and blood lymphocytes. Regarding cachexia progression, the patients with GPS 2 had a higher serum interleukin-6 concentration and a lower serum nivolumab concentration than those with GPS 0 or 1. The GPS, serum IgG, and blood lymphocytes were identified as independent variables for serum nivolumab. The incidence of irAEs was not associated with the nivolumab dose or serum nivolumab. CONCLUSION: Cachexia progression had a negative impact on serum nivolumab in cancer patients. The interindividual variation in serum nivolumab was characterized by cachexia progression in addition to blood components.

Bioanalytical Challenges due to Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Exposure: Interference and Mitigation in Drug Concentration and Immunogenicity Assays.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a leading class of biotherapeutics. In oncology, patients often fail on early lines of biologic therapy to a specific target. Some patients may then enroll in a new clinical trial with a mAb specific for the same target. Therefore, immunoassays designed to quantify the current mAb therapy or assess immunogenicity to the drug may be susceptible to cross-reactivity or interference with residual prior biologics. The impact of two approved anti-PD-1 mAbs, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, was tested in several immunoassays for cemiplimab, another approved anti-PD-1 mAb. The methods included a target-capture drug concentration assay, a bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay and a competitive ligand-binding neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay. We also tested bioanalytical strategies to mitigate cross-reactivity or interference in these assays from other anti-PD-1 biologics. Both pembrolizumab and nivolumab cross-reacted in the cemiplimab drug concentration assay. This was mitigated by addition of antibodies specific to pembrolizumab or nivolumab. ADA specific for pembrolizumab and nivolumab did not interfere in the cemiplimab ADA assay. However, pembrolizumab and nivolumab generated a false-positive response in a target-capture NAb assay. Our results demonstrate that similar exogenous pre-existing anti-PD-1 mAbs (biotherapeutics) such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab are detected and accurately quantified in the cemiplimab drug concentration assay. However, once steady state is achieved for the new therapy, prior biologics would likely not be detected. Cross-reactivity and interference in immunoassays from previous treatment with class-specific biotherapeutic(s) pose significant bioanalytical challenges, especially in immuno-oncology.

[Peripheral Blood Inflammation Indicators as Predictive Indicators in 
Immunotherapy of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, of which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have now become one of the main treatments for advanced NSCLC. This paper retrospectively investigated the effect of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes on the efficacy of immunotherapy and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, in order to find strategies to guide immunotherapy in NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who were hospitalized in The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from October 2018 to August 2019 were selected to receive anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, sintilimab or toripalimab) monotherapy or combination regimens. And were followed up until 10 December 2020, and the efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST1.1 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were followed up for survival analysis. A clinical prediction model was constructed to analyze the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) based on NLR data at three different time points: before treatment, 6 weeks after treatment and 12 weeks after treatment (0w, 6w and 12w), and the accuracy of the model was verified. RESULTS: 173 patients were finally included, all of whom received the above treatment regimen, were followed up for a median of 19.7 months. The objective response rate (ORR) was 27.7% (48/173), the disease control rate (DCR) was 89.6% (155/173), the median PFS was 8.3 months (7.491-9.109) and the median OS was 15.5 months (14.087-16.913). The chi-square test and logistic multi-factor analysis showed that NLR6w was associated with ORR and NLR12w was associated with ORR and DCR. Further Cox regression analysis showed that NLR6w and NLR12w affected PFS and NLR0w, NLR6w and NLR12w were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, NLR values at different time points are valid predictors of response to immunotherapy, and NLR <3 is often associated with a good prognosis.

Comparing singlet and duplicate immunogenicity assay in human plasma for pembrolizumab using Gyrolab®.

Aim: For decades, the traditional approach for ligand-binding assays has been to generate two measurements from adjacent wells on the plate. In recent years, scientists have investigated the true benefit of this 'duplicate analysis' by looking back at previously generated bioanalytical data with the conclusion that the benefits are negligible. Materials & methods: We demonstrated a method development approach to determine the best number of replicate measurements of an immunogenicity assay. We used an anti-pembrolizumab immunogenicity assay on Gyrolab® to challenge the traditional use of duplicate measurements as we compare it to singlet measurement and show a balanced design for assessing the cut-point in singlet. Results & conclusion: We introduced the concept of calculating the maximum drug tolerance during method development. In this method, we found no practical benefit for duplicate analysis and go further in recommending that singlet analysis should be considered the default for all ligand-binding assays.

Development, Validation, and Comparison of Two Mass Spectrometry Methods (LC-MS/HRMS and LC-MS/MS) for the Quantification of Rituximab in Human Plasma.

Rituximab is a chimeric immunoglobulin G1-kappa (IgG1κ) antibody targeting the CD20 antigen on B-lymphocytes. Its applications are various, such as for the treatment of chronic lymphoid leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in oncology, and it can also be used in the treatment of certain autoimmune diseases. Several studies support the interest in therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize dosing regimens of rituximab. Thus, two different laboratories have developed accurate and reproductive methods to quantify rituximab in human plasma: one using liquid chromatography quadripolar tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) and the other, liquid chromatography orbitrap tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS/HRMS). For both assays, quantification was based on albumin depletion or IgG-immunocapture, surrogate peptide analysis, and full-length stable isotope-labeled rituximab. With LC-MS/MS, the concentration range was from 5 to 500 µg/mL, the within- and between-run precisions were <8.5%, and the limit of quantitation was 5 µg/mL. With LC-MS/HRMS, the concentration range was from 10 to 200 µg/mL, the within- and between-run accuracy were <11.5%, and the limit of quantitation was 2 µg/mL. Rituximab plasma concentrations from 63 patients treated for vasculitis were compared. Bland-Altman analysis and Passing-Bablok regression showed the interchangeability between these two methods. Overall, these methods were robust and reliable and could be applied to routine clinical samples.

Brain pharmacokinetics of anti-transferrin receptor antibody affinity variants in rats determined using microdialysis.

Receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) is used to enhance the delivery of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) into the central nervous system (CNS). While the binding to endogenous receptors on the brain capillary endothelial cells (BCECs) may facilitate the uptake of mAbs in the brain, a strong affinity for the receptor may hinder the efficiency of transcytosis. To quantitatively investigate the effect of binding affinity on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anti-transferrin receptor (TfR) mAbs in different regions of the rat brain, we conducted a microdialysis study to directly measure the concentration of free mAbs at different sites of interest. Our results confirmed that bivalent anti-TfR mAb with an optimal dissociation constant (KD) value (76 nM) among four affinity variants can have up to 10-fold higher transcytosed free mAb exposure in the brain interstitial fluid (bISF) compared to lower and higher affinity mAbs (5 and 174 nM). This bell-shaped relationship between KD values and the increased brain exposure of mAbs was also visible when using whole-brain PK data. However, we found that mAb concentrations in postvascular brain supernatant (obtained after capillary depletion) were almost always higher than the concentrations measured in bISF using microdialysis. We also observed that the increase in mAb area under the concentration curve in CSF compartments was less significant, which highlights the challenge in using CSF measurement as a surrogate for estimating the efficiency of RMT delivery. Our results also suggest that the determination of mAb concentrations in the brain using microdialysis may be necessary to accurately measure the PK of CNS-targeted antibodies at the site-of-actions in the brain.

Simultaneous quantification of rituximab and eculizumab in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with rituximab ELISA kits.

OBJECTIVES: Specific and sensitive analytical techniques to quantify therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are required for therapeutic drug monitoring. The quantification of mAbs has been historically performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), for which the limitations in terms of specificity have led to the development of alternative analytical strategies. METHODS: Here, we describe the validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of rituximab (RTX - anti-CD20) and eculizumab (ECU - anti-C5). Sample preparation was based on our previously published method, using protein G purification and trypsin digestion. A new specific peptide for RTX, containing an N-terminal pyroglutamine and a trypsin miss-cleavage, enables better sensitivity, while peptide of ECU was chosen thanks to an in silico trypsin digestion and the Skyline® software. Full-length stable-isotope-labeled adalimumab was added to plasma samples as an internal standard. RTX in 50 human serum samples was quantified by LC-MS/MS and the concentrations obtained compared to those obtained with two commercial ELISA kits (Lisa Tracker® and Promonitor®). RESULTS: Calibration curves were linear from 1 to 200 µg.mL-1 for RTX and 5 to 200 µg.mL-1 for ECU, and within-day and between-day accuracy and precision fulfilled Food and Drug Administration validation criteria. Comparison of the LC-MS/MS method with ELISA showed a negligible bias with the Lisa Tracker® kit (4%), but significant bias with the Promonitor® assay (mean underestimation of 69% for the Promonitor® assay). CONCLUSIONS: This new LC-MS/MS method allows the simultaneous quantification of RTX and ECU in human samples and could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to surface plasmon resonance detection for analysis of therapeutic proteins in blood serum.

Coupling of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) detection to asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) offers the possibility to study active fractions of bio-separations on real samples, such as serum and saliva, including the assessment of activity of possibly aggregated species. The coupling of SPR with AF4 requires the possibility to select fractions from a fractogram and redirect them to the SPR. The combination of SPR with chromatography-like methods also requires a mechanism for regeneration of the receptor immobilised onto the SPR sensor surface. In recent work, the combination of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with SPR was pioneered as a successful methodology for identification, characterisation and quantification of active biocomponents in biological samples. In this study, the approach using AF4 is evaluated for the antibody trastuzumab in buffer and serum. The particular object of this study was to test the feasibility of using AF4 in combination with SPR to detect and quantify proteins and aggregates in complex samples such as blood serum. Also, in the investigation, three different immobilisation methods for the receptor HER-2 were compared, which involved (1) direct binding via EDC/NHS, the standard approach; (2) immobilisation via NTA-Ni-Histag complexation; and (3) biotin/avidin-linked chemistry using a regenerable form of avidin. The highest specific activity was obtained for the biotin-avidin method, while the lowest specific activity was observed for the NTA-Ni-Histag linkage. The data show that AF4 can separate trastuzumab monomers and aggregates in blood serum and that SPR has the ability to selectively monitor the elution. This is an encouraging result for automated analysis of complex biological samples using AF4-SPR.

Cetuximab Exhibits Sex Differences in Lymphatic Exposure after Intravenous Administration in Rats in the Absence of Differences in Plasma Exposure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to identify whether biochemical and physiological sources of mAb pharmacokinetic sex-effects could be identified in the rat model where target-mediated disposition is avoided. METHODS: Plasma and lymphatic pharmacokinetics of the humanised anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, along with potential physiological and biochemical drivers of pharmacokinetic sex differences, were examined in male and female rats. Cetuximab was used as a model mAb since plasma clearance is slower in female patients. RESULTS: When plasma concentrations were normalised to dose, female rats displayed slower plasma clearance than males, but no significant differences were observed in liver and spleen biodistribution. Sex differences in apparent plasma clearance, however, were abolished after normalisation to body weight, surface area or fat-free mass. Significant sex differences were observed in plasma testosterone, endogenous IgG and fat free mass, but did not correlate with apparent clearance. Females did, however, show two-fold higher lymphatic exposure compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that mAbs more efficiently access lymph in females, but this does not affect plasma pharmacokinetics or biodistribution. Further, the data suggest that sex differences observed in humans could be a function of antigen density.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Proposed Biosimilar ABP 798 With Rituximab Reference Product in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

ABP 798 is a proposed biosimilar to rituximab reference product (RP), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety results from the comparative clinical study that evaluated the PK, PD, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of ABP 798 versus rituximab RP are presented here. Subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received 2 doses of ABP 798, United States-sourced RP (rituximab US) or European Union-sourced RP (rituximab EU), each consisting of two 1000-mg infusions 2 weeks apart. For the second dose (week 24), ABP 798- and rituximab EU-treated subjects received the same treatment; rituximab US-treated subjects transitioned to ABP 798. End points included area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity and maximum observed serum concentration following the second infusion of the first dose (PK) and percentage of subjects with complete CD19+ cell depletion days 1-33 (PD). Primary analysis established PK similarity between ABP 798 and rituximab RP based on 90% confidence intervals of the adjusted geometric mean ratios being within a prespecified equivalence margin of 0.8 and 1.25. Complete CD19+ B-cell depletion on day 3 among groups confirmed PD similarity. These findings demonstrated PK/PD similarity between ABP 798 and rituximab RP in subjects with moderate to severe RA.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of IBI301 versus rituximab in patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IBI301 with rituximab in patients with CD20-positive (CD20+) B-cell lymphoma, who achieved a complete response/unconfirmed complete response after standard treatments. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive IBI301 or rituximab (375 mg/m2, IV). Patients who continuously benefitted from the trial after the PK phase underwent the extension phase to receive up to three cycles of 3-month-cycle of rituximab/IBI301 maintenance therapy. PK was described using the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Pharmacodynamics (PD), incidence of adverse events and immunogenicity were evaluated. PK was defined equivalent, if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios of PK endpoints fell within the margin of 0.8-1.25. Overall, 181 patients were enrolled in IBI301 (n = 89) and rituximab (n = 92) groups. Geometric mean ratios of AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, and Cmax were 0.91 (90% CI 0.85, 0.97), 0.91 (90% CI 0.86, 0.97), and 0.96 (90% CI 0.92, 1.01) between treatment groups, all within the bioequivalence range. Peripheral CD19+ and CD20+ B-cell counts were similar at each prespecified time point between the groups. No difference in immunogenicity was observed. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (84.3% vs. 83.5%) and treatment-related AEs (56.2% vs. 61.5%) were comparable (IBI301 vs. rituximab). IBI301 was PK bioequivalent to rituximab in patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma. The PD, safety, and immunogenicity profiles of IBI301 were similar to those of rituximab.

T-DM1-induced thrombocytopenia in breast cancer patients: New perspectives.

PURPOSE: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in 15-20% of patients with breast cancer. HER2 overexpression is the result of a genetic alteration and this marker is associated with poor clinical outcomes. HER2-targeted therapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with either early or advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. One such therapy is the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), a combination of trastuzumab and the cytotoxic antimicrotubule agent DM1. After T-DM1 binds HER2, DM1 is subsequently released into the cell. T-DM1 is generally well tolerated and has a relatively low incidence of adverse events. However, there are clinical concerns regarding T-DM1-induced high-grade thrombocytopenia. METHODS: Here, we summarize the incidence of thrombocytopenia from several clinical trials and review experimental studies to explore the causes for T-DM1-induced thrombocytopenia. Progress in several other ADCs targeting HER2-positive breast cancer was also reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that T-DM1 uptake by megakaryocytes occurs through either Fcγ receptor binding or through pinocytosis, and we suggest several methods through which these processes could be interrupted to potentially improve the clinical safety of T-DM1. More generally, we recommend that toxicity should be carefully addressed during the development of ADCs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of nivolumab in routine clinical practice. A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: A review of the literature about the anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab permits to verify the existence  of several issues still unresolved about their dosing schedule. The aim of the present work was to explore possibilities of nivolumab treatment  personalization through therapeutic drug monitoring, in order to  improve their effectiveness and efficiency. METHOD: Observational, prospective study carried out from May 2017  through June 2019 in patients with different tumor diagnoses treated with nivolumab. Blood samples were obtained in the routine  clinical practice, once nivolumab steady state was reached. Serum  nivolumab levels were determined by means of quantitative ELISA. The  standard schedule of 3 mg/kg every two weeks (Q2W) was modified in  some patients due to different circumstances, and resulting serum  concentrations were compared with those from the non-modified  patients and the published data. RESULTS: Blood samples from 19 patients in treatment with nivolumab were analyzed. A total of 39 samples of nivolumab were  analyzed between 6th and 27th cycles. The standard schedule of 3  mg/kg every two weeks was modified in 12/19 (60%) patients, with  intervals of 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 weeks, once the steady state was reached.  No statistically significant differences were detected when comparing  every two weeks and every four week intervals. When the intervals  were six or seven weeks, mean plasma concentration showed a  statistically significant difference compared with every two weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Current data contribute to confirm former suspects about the possibilities of exploring new scenarios to improve and  personalize nivolumab dosage. Additional studies to confirm it in bigger  series and correlate it with clinical results, and to better define the role  of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment, are warranted, not only by financial concerns but also for improving quality of life of patients  and clinical management aspects.

Objetivo: Una revisión de la literatura sobre nivolumab permite  verificar la existencia de diversos aspectos sin resolver sobre su  intervalo de dosificación. El objetivo del presente estudio ha sido  explorar las posibilidades de personalización del tratamiento con  nivolumab mediante la monitorización terapéutica de sus  concentraciones séricas para mejorar su efectividad y eficiencia.Método: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, realizado entre mayo de 2017 y junio de 2019 en pacientes tratados con nivolumab que  estaban diagnosticados de diferentes tumores. Se obtuvieron muestras  de sangre en la práctica clínica habitual, una vez alcanzado el estado de  equilibrio de nivolumab. Las concentraciones séricas de nivolumab  fueron determinadas mediante ELISA cuantitativo. La pauta posológica  habitual de 3 mg/kg cada dos semanas tuvo que ser modificada en  algunos pacientes debido a diferentes circunstancias, y las  concentraciones séricas resultantes se compararon con las  correspondientes a los pacientes en los que no se modificó y con datos  publicados.Resultados: Se analizaron muestras de 19 pacientes que recibieron inicialmente 3 mg/kg de nivolumab cada dos semanas. Se  analizó un total de 39 muestras, entre los ciclos 6 y 27. La pauta  habitual se modificó, una vez alcanzado el estado de equilibrio, en  12/19 (60%) pacientes, en los que se amplió el intervalo a 3, 4, 5, 6 o 7 semanas. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas  al comparar la administración cada dos semanas y cada cuatro  semanas. Cuando los intervalos fueron de seis o siete semanas, la  concentración sérica media mostró una diferencia estadísticamente  significativa en comparación con la administración cada dos semanas.Conclusiones: La información recogida parece confirmar la necesidad de explorar nuevos escenarios para personalizar la  dosificación de nivolumab. Se necesitan estudios adicionales en series  de mayor tamaño para confirmar esta información, correlacionarla con  los resultados clínicos y definir mejor el papel de la monitorización  terapéutica, no solo por motivos económicos, sino también para mejorar  la calidad de vida de los pacientes y facilitar la administración  clínica del tratamiento.

Phase I dose escalation study of BI 836826 (CD37 antibody) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BI 836826 is a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting CD37, a tetraspanin transmembrane protein predominantly expressed on normal and malignant B cells. This phase I, open-label study used a modified 3 + 3 design to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of BI 836826 in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; NCT01403948). Eligible patients received up to three courses comprising an intravenous infusion (starting dose: 1 mg) once weekly for 4 weeks followed by an observation period of 27 (Course 1, 2) or 55 days (Course 3). Patients had to demonstrate clinical benefit before commencing treatment beyond course 2. Forty-eight patients were treated. In the dose escalation phase (1-200 mg) involving 37 Caucasian patients, the MTD was 100 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in four patients during the MTD evaluation period, and included stomatitis, febrile neutropenia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, and hypophosphatemia. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (57%), leukopenia (57%), and thrombocytopenia (41%), and were commonly of grade 3 or 4. Overall, 18 (38%) patients experienced infusion-related reactions, which were mostly grade 1 or 2. Preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity was seen; three patients responded to treatment, including one complete remission in a Korean patient with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. BI 836826 plasma exposure increased more than proportionally with increasing doses. BI 836826 demonstrated preliminary activity; the most frequent adverse events were hematotoxicity and infusion-related reactions which were manageable after amending the infusion schedule. Although BI 856826 will not undergo further clinical development, these results confirm CD37 as a valid therapeutic target in B cell NHL.

A Canadian cancer trials group phase IB study of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) plus tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) given concurrently or sequentially in patients with advanced, incurable solid malignancies.

Background The IND.226 study was a phase Ib study to determine the recommended phase II dose of durvalumab + tremelimumab in combination with standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Sequential administration of multiple agents increases total chair time adding costs overall and inconvenience for patients. This cohort of the IND.226 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of durvalumab + tremelimumab given either sequentially (SEQ) or concurrently (CON). Methods Patients with advanced solid tumours were enrolled and randomised to either SEQ tremelimumab 75 mg IV over 1 h followed by durvalumab 1500 mg IV over 1 h q4wks on the same day, or CON administration over 1 h. The serum pharmacokinetic profile of SEQ versus CON of durvalumab and tremelimumab administration was also evaluated. Results 14 patients either received SEQ (n = 7pts) or CON (n = 7 pts). There were no infusion related reactions. Drug related adverse events (AEs) were mainly low grade and manageable, and comparable in frequency between SEQ/CON- fatigue (43%/57%), rash (43%/43%), pruritus (43%/29%) and nausea (14%/29%). One patient in each cohort discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The PK profiles of durvalumab and tremelimumab were similar between CON and SEQ, and to historical reference data. Conclusions Concurrent administration of durvalumab and tremelimumab over 1 h is safe with a comparable PK profile to sequential administration.

Pharmacokinetics of Trastuzumab After Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration in Obese Patients.

Background: Subcutaneous trastuzumab (T-SC) administration does not allow the historical target concentration of 20 µg/mL for efficacy to be reached, from the start of treatment in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2. Objectives: To analyze the influence of the strategy of dosification (fixed vs adjusted patient's body weight dose) on the initial minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of trastuzumab in obese patients. Methods: This was an observational, prospective study, which included patients with HER2-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab. The determination of the Cmin of trastuzumab was performed on day +21 of the first cycle using the ELISA technique. Patients were stratified according to the strategy of dosification and BMI. Results: A total of 50 patients were included; 16 patients received the drug intravenously and 34 in a fixed dosage subcutaneous (T-SC) regimen. The proportion of patients who achieved an adequate plasma concentration since the beginning of treatment was significantly higher when the drug was administered intravenously (93.8% vs 67.6%, P = 0.042). These differences are especially greater in T-SC patients with BMI >30 kg/m2, with only 20% of patients exceeding the pharmacokinetic target. Conclusion and Relevance: Our study suggests that trastuzumab SC fixed dose of 600 mg is not equivalent to IV administration, especially in obese patients. An adequate trastuzumab exposure in this population needs patient weight-adjusted IV dosage in the first administration. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be elucidated, and further research, including larger controlled trials, is warranted.

Population Pharmacokinetics of an Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, Durvalumab in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Durvalumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, has been approved for urothelial carcinoma and stage III non-small cell lung cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration and is being evaluated in various malignancies. The objective of this study was to develop a population-pharmacokinetic model of durvalumab in patients with various hematologic malignancies and to investigate the effects of demographic and disease factors on the pharmacokinetics in this population. METHODS: A total of 1812 concentrations from 267 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of durvalumab was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. A decrease in durvalumab clearance over time was mainly explained by incorporation of time-dependent changes in albumin (in all patients) and immunoglobulin G (in patients with multiple myeloma) into the model. For multiple myeloma, patients with immunoglobulin G ≥ 20 g/L showed a 30% lower area under the concentration-time curve at cycle 1 compared with patients with immunoglobulin G < 20 g/L. The impact of any baseline covariates on durvalumab pharmacokinetics did not appear to be clinically relevant. The pharmacokinetics of durvalumab in hematologic malignancies was generally consistent with previously reported pharmacokinetics in solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the same dosing regimen (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies from the perspective of adequate exposure. Additionally, total immunoglobulin G level could be a critical covariate for the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma.

A Machine-Learning Approach to Identify a Prognostic Cytokine Signature That Is Associated With Nivolumab Clearance in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Lower clearance of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a predictor of improved overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer. We investigated a novel approach using machine learning to identify a baseline composite cytokine signature via clearance, which, in turn, could be associated with OS in advanced melanoma. Peripheral nivolumab clearance and cytokine data from patients treated with nivolumab in two phase III studies (n = 468 (pooled)) and another phase III study (n = 158) were used for machine-learning model development and validation, respectively. Random forest (Boruta) algorithm was used for feature selection and classification of nivolumab clearance. The 16 top-ranking baseline inflammatory cytokines reflecting immune-cell modulation were selected as a composite signature to predict nivolumab clearance (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.75; accuracy = 0.7). Predicted clearance (high vs. low) via the cytokine signature was significantly associated with OS across all three studies (P < 0.01), regardless of treatment (nivolumab vs. chemotherapy).

Comparison of Bevacizumab Quantification Results in Plasma of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using Bioanalytical Techniques Between LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and Microfluidic-based Immunoassay.

The development of analytical techniques to study therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is expected to be useful for pharmacokinetic analysis and for the development of therapeutic indexes to determine dosage standards. To date, the blood concentration of antibody drugs has been analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, with the development of mass spectrometry and microfluidization technologies, the assay implication is drastically changing. We have developed an analytical validation method for many monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins using Fab-selective proteolysis nSMOL coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, the correlation between the analyzed data characterization and the referable value from individual measurement techniques has not been adequately discussed. Therefore, in this study, we discussed in detail the relationship of the bioanalytical data from three different techniques, LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and microfluidic immunoassay, using 245 clinical plasma samples from non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. The quantified concentration data of bevacizumab in human plasma indicated that the results obtained were almost the same correlation regardless of which technique was used. And the referable value from LC-MS/MS and microfluidic immunoassay were similar and correlated compared with ELISA.

Intracranial antitumor responses of nivolumab and ipilimumab: a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic perspective, a scoping systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recently, two phase II trials showed intracranial activity of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with melanoma brain metastases. However, it is generally assumed that large molecules like monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and ipilimumab cannot penetrate and pass an intact blood brain barrier (BBB). In this systematic review we provide a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic consideration of the clinical activity of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: Pubmed was systematically searched for prospective phase II and III studies on nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma brain metastases and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Results were discussed and a perspective on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics for the intracranial activity of these agents was given. RESULTS: Two phase II studies with the combination nivolumab and ipilimumab and one phase II study with ipilimumab monotherapy in melanoma brain metastases were included in this review. One article reported drug levels of nivolumab in CSF. Intracranial responses were achieved in 16 of 35 patients (46%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 29-63) in a phase II study cohort treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. In a second phase II study in 94 patients, the rate of intracranial clinical benefit was 57% (95% CI 47-68). The CSF/serum ratio of nivolumab was 0.88-1.9% in a cohort of metastatic melanoma patients treated with nivolumab 1-3 mg/kg. Nivolumab concentrations ranged from 35 to 150 ng/ml in CSF of these patients, which is in the range of the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 0.64 nM. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab and nivolumab are active in melanoma brain metastases. Nivolumab penetrates into the CSF. Based on the described findings the general consensus that monoclonal antibodies do not penetrate into the central nervous system (CNS) and cannot have a direct intracranial effect needs to be reconsidered.