Pharmacological interventions for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Network meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that can have significant negative impacts on a child's health and development. A comprehensive evaluation of different pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of OSA in children is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmacological interventions for the management of obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric population. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched from 1950 to November 2022 for pediatric OSA. STUDY SELECTION: Multiple reviewers included Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning drugs on OSA in children. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Multiple observers followed the guidance of the PRISMA NMA statement for data extraction and evaluation. Bayesian network meta-analyses(fixed-effect model) were performed to compare the weighted mean difference (WMD), logarithmic odds ratios (log OR), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the included pharmacological interventions. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO website (CRD42022377839). MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were improvements in the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes included adverse events and the lowest arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). RESULTS: 17 RCTs with a total of 1367 children with OSA aged 2-14 years that met the inclusion criteria were eventually included in our systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ten drugs were finally included in the study. The results revealed that Mometasone + Montelukast (WMD-4.74[95%CrIs -7.50 to -2.11], Budesonide (-3.45[-6.86 to -0.15], and Montelukast(-3.41[-5.45 to -1.39] exhibited significantly superior therapeutic effects compared to the placebo concerning apnea hypopnea index (AHI) value with 95%CrIs excluding no effect. Moreover, Mometasone + Montelukast achieved exceptionally high SUCRA values for both AHI (85.0 %) and SaO2 (91.0 %). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The combination of mometasone furoate nasal spray and oral montelukast sodium exhibits the highest probability of being the most effective intervention. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety profiles of these interventions in pediatric patients with OSA.

[Research status of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on obstructive sleep apnea].

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep-disordered breathing disease. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard for treatment, but compliance is suboptimal. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies need to be explored. OSA is often associated with multiple comorbidities, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity. Effective weight loss is known to be crucial in reversing OSA and its associated comorbidities. However, sustained weight loss is difficult to achieve with lifestyle changes alone. Medications that have both hypoglycemic and weight-loss effects are one way to achieve this goal. This article discussed the therapeutic effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on this disease.

The impact of intranasal corticosteroids in a prospective cohort of children with sleep disordered breathing.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common in children and the most common reason for adenotonsillectomy. This large observational cohort study from a specialist outpatient clinic describes the impact of intranasal steroids (INS) on symptom improvement and the need for surgery. METHOD: Observational cohort study of 568 children assessing the impact of INS using the OSA-5 questionnaire with clinical and surgical outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean OSA-5 score at first visit was 7.78. Symptoms were persistent for a median 9 months (range 2-72). 51% underwent a trial of INS with 56% reporting symptomatic improvement. The mean score decreased from 8.2 to 5.5 (p < 0.0001) in those prescribed INS. They had a significantly higher symptom load (p < 0.01), turbinate size (p < 0.005) and history of atopy (p < 0.01) than the non-trial group. The rate of surgery in the non-trial group was 56% compared with 38% in those who had INS (p < 0.001). With increasing symptom burden, the reported improvement with INS and comparative reduction in surgery increased. Baseline OSA-5 scores were predictive of rates of surgery. Atopic status or age did not influence response to INS. CONCLUSION: The mean score at first visit and the median duration of symptoms indicated significant persistent symptoms in this cohort. The use of INS improved symptoms of SDB in 56%. The need for surgery in the group that received INS was 38% compared with 56% in those not trialling INS, despite the non-trial group having significantly less symptoms and signs. Symptomatic improvement was not influenced by age or atopic status.

DAHOS Study: Efficacy of dapagliflozin in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome - A 3-month, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The recent discovery of new therapeutic approaches to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, as well as improved treatment of co-morbidities has provided much needed help to HFrEF. In addition, dapagliflozin, one of the SGLT-2 inhibitors, serves as a promising candidate in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) of HFrEF patients due to its likely mechanism of countering the pathophysiology of OSA of HFrEF. METHODS: This 3-month multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled participants with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 15. Participants were randomized into two groups: the treatment group received optimized heart failure treatment and standard-dose dapagliflozin, while the control group only received optimized heart failure treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in AHI before and after treatment between the two groups. Secondary endpoints included oxygen desaturation index (ODI), minimum oxygen saturation, longest apnea duration, inflammatory factors (CRP, IL-6), quality of life score, and LVEF. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the final analysis. AHI, LVEF and other baseline data were similar for the dapagliflozin and control groups. After 12 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment, the dapagliflozin group showed significant improvements in sleep parameters including AHI, HI, longest pause time, ODI, time spent with SpO2 < 90%, and average SpO2. Meanwhile, the control group showed no significant changes in sleep parameters, but did demonstrate significant improvements in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEF, and NT-proBNP levels at 12 weeks. In the experimental group, BMI was significantly reduced, and there were improvements in ESS score, MLHFQ score, and EQ-5D-3L score, as well as significant reductions in CRP and IL-6 levels, while the CRP and IL-6 levels were not improved in the control group. The decrease in LVEF was more significant in the experimental group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the decreases between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin may be an effective treatment for heart failure complicated with OSA, and could be considered as a potential new treatment for OSA. (Trial registration  www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2100049834. Registered 10 August 2021).

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis. RESULTS: 4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362639.

A novel TASK channel antagonist nasal spray reduces sleep apnea severity in physiological responders: a randomized, blinded, trial.

Preclinical and human physiological studies indicate that topical, selective TASK 1/3 K+ channel antagonism increases upper airway dilator muscle activity and reduces pharyngeal collapsibility during anesthesia and nasal breathing during sleep. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of BAY2586116 nasal spray on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and whether individual responses vary according to differences in physiological responses and route of breathing. Ten people (5 females) with OSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) = 47 ± 26 events/h (means ± SD)] who completed previous sleep physiology studies with BAY2586116 were invited to return for three polysomnography studies to quantify OSA severity. In random order, participants received either placebo nasal spray (saline), BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg), or BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg) restricted to nasal breathing (chinstrap or mouth tape). Physiological responders were defined a priori as those who had improved upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure ≥2 cmH2O) with BAY2586116 nasal spray (NCT04236440). There was no systematic change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI3) from placebo versus BAY2586116 with either unrestricted or nasal-only breathing versus placebo (47 ± 26 vs. 43 ± 27 vs. 53 ± 33 events/h, P = 0.15). However, BAY2586116 (unrestricted breathing) reduced OSA severity in physiological responders compared with placebo (e.g., AHI3 = 28 ± 11 vs. 36 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.03 and ODI3 = 18 ± 10 vs. 28 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.02). Morning blood pressure was also lower in physiological responders after BAY2586116 versus placebo (e.g., systolic blood pressure = 137 ± 24 vs. 147 ± 21 mmHg, P < 0.01). In conclusion, BAY2586116 reduces OSA severity during sleep in people who demonstrate physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of this novel pharmacotherapy target in selected individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Preclinical findings in pigs and humans indicate that blocking potassium channels in the upper airway with topical nasal application increases pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and reduces upper airway collapsibility. In this study, BAY2586116 nasal spray (potassium channel blocker) reduced sleep apnea severity in those who had physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. BAY2586116 lowered the next morning's blood pressure. These findings highlight the potential for this novel therapeutic approach to improve sleep apnea in certain people.

Drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that can affect the quality of life and increase the risk for psychiatric, neurological and cardiometabolic diseases. Despite the significant burden, it poses on health and well-being, there is a lack of evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in these patients. This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment alternatives for patients with OSA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, will be used for the search. A search strategy was developed to retrieve clinical trials that have evaluated polysomnographic primary outcome (Apnoea-Hypopnoea index) and secondary outcomes (eg, daytime sleepiness, adverse events) of any drug therapy used for OSA. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Two authors will independently select the studies meeting the inclusion criteria by screening the title, abstract and full text. Data will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Review Manager V.5.4.1 will be used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the strength of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a review of published data, it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362639.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of respiratory safety of lemborexant in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the respiratory safety of lemborexant among adults and older adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: E2006-A001-113 (Study 113; NCT04647383) was a double-blind, two-period crossover, placebo-controlled study in adults (ages ≥ 45 to ≤ 90 years, n = 33) with moderate (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] score ≥ 15 to < 30 events/h, n = 13) or severe (AHI ≥ 30 events/h, n = 20) OSA. Participants were randomized to lemborexant 10 mg (LEM10) or placebo (PBO) for two treatment periods of 8 nights with a ≥ 14-day washout period. AHI and peripheral oxygen saturation were evaluated after treatment on Day 1 (after a single dose) and Day 8 (after multiple doses). RESULTS: No significant differences in AHI were observed after single and multiple doses of LEM10 compared with PBO in participants with moderate to severe OSA (least-squares mean: single-dose LEM10, 41.7; PBO, 44.8; multiple-dose LEM10, 44.9; PBO, 45.7). In addition, there were no significant differences between treatments in peripheral oxygen saturation (least-squares mean: single-dose LEM10, 93.0; PBO, 93.1; multiple-dose LEM10, 93.1; PBO, 93.4). Further, there were no significant differences between treatments in percentage of total sleep time with peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%, < 85%, or < 80%. No significant differences were observed between treatments when AHI and peripheral oxygen saturation outcomes were analyzed by OSA severity. Altogether, 6/33 (18.2%) participants receiving LEM10, vs 3/33 (9.1%) PBO, reported treatment-emergent adverse events, mostly mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: LEM10 demonstrated respiratory safety and was well tolerated with single-dose and multiple-dose administration in participants with moderate to severe OSA. This suggests that LEM may be a treatment option for patients with OSA and comorbid insomnia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Study to Evaluate the Respiratory Safety of Lemborexant in Adult and Elderly Participants With Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea and in Adult and Elderly Participants With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04647383; Identifier: NCT04647383. CITATION: Cheng JY, Lorch D, Lowe AD, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of respiratory safety of lemborexant in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):57-65.

A global comparative field study to evaluate the factor VIII activity of efanesoctocog alfa by one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays at clinical haemostasis laboratories.

INTRODUCTION: Structural and chemical modifications of factor VIII (FVIII) products may influence their behaviour in FVIII activity assays. Hence, it is important to assess the performance of FVIII products in these assays. Efanesoctocog alfa is a new class of FVIII replacement therapy designed to provide both high sustained factor activity levels and prolonged plasma half-life. AIM: Evaluate the accuracy of measuring efanesoctocog alfa FVIII activity in one-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and chromogenic substrate assays (CSAs). METHODS: Human plasma with no detectable FVIII activity was spiked with efanesoctocog alfa or a full-length recombinant FVIII product comparator, octocog alfa, at nominal concentrations of 0.80 IU/mL, 0.20 IU/mL, or 0.05 IU/mL, based on labelled potency. Clinical haemostasis laboratories (N = 35) tested blinded samples using in-house assays. Data from 51 OSAs (14 activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] reagents) and 42 CSAs (eight kits) were analyzed. RESULTS: Efanesoctocog alfa activity was reliably (±25% of nominal activity) measured across all concentrations using OSAs with Actin FSL and multiple other aPTT reagents. Under- and overestimation of FVIII activity occurred with some reagents. No specific trend was observed for any class of aPTT activators. A two- to three-fold overestimation was consistently observed using CSAs and the OSA with Actin FS as the aPTT reagent across evaluated concentrations. CONCLUSION: Under- or overestimation occurred with some specific OSAs and most CSAs, which has been previously observed with other modified FVIII replacement products. Efanesoctocog alfa FVIII activity was measured with acceptable accuracy and reliability using several OSA methods and commercial plasma standards.

[Obstructive sleep apnea and central/peripheral chemosensitivity: an essential part of pathophysiological mechanisms].

Unstable ventilatory control is one of the key pathophysiological mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and the activity of chemoreceptors is an important part of ventilatory control. Chemosensitivity has a significant impact on the severity and prognosis of OSA, and the incidence of comorbidities. The focus on reducing chemosensitivity can be seen as an emerging theme to promote individualized and precise treatment of OSA. Further exploration of chemosensitivity in OSA will be an emerging direction and a major challenge for current and future research in the field of sleep.

Pharmacological management of co-morbid obstructive sleep apnoea and insomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical presentation of both insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA) is common. Approximately 30% of clinical cohorts with OSA have insomnia symptoms and vice versa. The underlying pathophysiology of COMISA is multifactorial. This poses a complex clinical challenge. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines or recommendations outside of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi). Clinically translatable precision medicine approaches to characterize individual causes or endotypes may help optimize future pharmacological management of COMISA. AREAS COVERED: This review article provides an up-to-date account of COMISA and its consequences, the underlying pathophysiology of sleep apnea, insomnia and COMISA, current treatment approaches and limitations, pharmacotherapy targets and future priorities. EXPERT OPINION: There are multiple promising emerging therapies, but clinical trial data specifically in COMISA populations are lacking. This is a priority for future investigation to inform development of evidence-based guidelines. Pharmacotherapies, particularly for insomnia, do not target the underlying causes of the disorder thus, are indicated for short-term use only and should remain second line. Future multidisciplinary research should be directed toward the multifactorial nature of COMISA and the challenges of adapting COMISA treatment in clinical practice and overcoming the practical barriers that health-care providers and consumers encounter.

Solriamfetol: A Review in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.

Solriamfetol (SUNOSI®) is an oral selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved in the EU and the USA for improving wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In phase III studies, 12 weeks' therapy with solriamfetol within the recommended dosage range for narcolepsy (75 mg or 150 mg once daily) or OSA (37.5 mg, 75 mg or 150 mg once daily) provided early and sustained reductions in excessive sleepiness and improvements in wakefulness relative to placebo. These effects were generally sustained through 52 weeks. The drug's effectiveness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy is supported by results from real-world studies. Solriamfetol demonstrated a consistent safety and tolerability profile across clinical studies, with commonly reported adverse reactions generally occurring within 2 weeks of treatment initiation and mostly resolving within 2 weeks. Thus, solriamfetol represents a useful treatment option for adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA.

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a common condition in which an individual is unable to stay awake during periods when they typically would be awake. Dopamine and norepinephrine are among the chemical messengers involved in sleep­wake regulation. Solriamfetol (SUNOSI^®), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is a once-daily oral treatment approved in the EU and the USA for improving wakefulness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In such patients, solriamfetol reduced excessive sleepiness and improved wakefulness compared with placebo over 12 weeks. Onset was rapid and generally sustained through 52 weeks. The safety and tolerability profile of solriamfetol was consistent over the short and longer term; the most common adverse reactions were headache, decreased appetite, nausea, anxiety and insomnia in adults with narcolepsy and nausea and decreased appetite in those with OSA. Thus, solriamfetol represents a useful treatment option for adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

Soporte telemático de autogestión para pacientes con apnea obstructiva del sueño en tratamiento con CPAP: aspectos metodológicos y resultados preliminares del ensayo clinico telesas / Telematic self-management support for patients with obstructive sleep apnea under CPAP treatment: methodological aspects and preliminary results of the telesas clinical trial

Objetivo: Comprobar si un programa de telemedicina mejora el cumplimiento con CPAP, alcanzando un uso de, al menos, 4 horas al día en el 90% de los pacientes. Realizamos un estudio piloto para comprobar la viabilidad de un proyecto multicéntrico en el que perfeccionaremos dicho programa. Metodología: Pacientes con AOS severa poco sintomáticos en tratamiento con CPAP fueron randomizados a seguimiento habitual o seguimiento habitual más un programa de telemedicina durante 6 meses. Dentro de este programa, las variables de telemonitorización, la aparición de efectos secundarios y la presencia de sueño reparador eran analizadas para generar alarmas e instrucciones al paciente para la autogestión precoz de los problemas presentados con la CPAP. Resultados: 60 pacientes fueron randomizados, 33 al grupo intervención y 27 al grupo control, sin diferencias significativas en las variables basales. El 80% eran hombres con un rango de edad entre los 24 y 75 años. Solo hubo un abandono en el grupo control. Conclusiones: El uso de nuestro programa de telemedicina no ha supuesto ningún problema para los pacientes incluidos a pesar de la horquilla amplia de edad, siendo viable el desarrollo de un estudio a mayor escala con una herramienta de telemedicina perfeccionada. (AU)

Basis: poor compliance with CPAP is a problem at a clinical and research level, assuming the expected results are not achieved. The benefits of using telemedicine in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are inconclusive, with its positive effect on compliance being the most consistent in the literature. Objective: to check if a telemedicine program improves compliance with CPAP, reaching use of at least 4 hours a day in 90% of patients. We carried out a pilot study to verify the viability of a multicenter project in which we will perfect this program. Method: patients with severe OSA with few symptoms on CPAP treatment were randomized to usual follow-up or usual follow-up plus a telemedicine program for 6 months. Within this program, the telemonitoring variables, the appearance of side effects and the presence of restorative sleep were analyzed to generate alarms and instructions to the patient for early self-management of the problems presented with CPAP. Preliminary results: 60 patients were randomized, 33 to the intervention group and 27 to the control group, with no significant differences in the baseline variables. 80% were men with an age range between 24 and 75 years. There was only one dropout in the control group. Conclusions: the use of our telemedicine program has not posed any problems for the included patients despite the wide age range, making it feasible to develop a larger-scale study with an improved telemedicine tool. (AU)

Giving weight to incretin-based pharmacotherapy for obesity-related sleep apnea: a revolution or a pipe dream?

Obesity is a chronic disease affecting over 670 million adults globally, with multiple complications including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Substantial weight loss in patients with obesity-related OSA can reduce or even eliminate OSA as well as reduce sleepiness and improve cardio-metabolic health. Evidence suggests that these improvements exceed those that occur with device-based OSA therapies like continuous positive airway pressure which continue to be the first-line of therapy. Resistance to weight management as a first-line strategy to combat OSA could arise from the complexities in delivering and maintaining adequate weight management, particularly in sleep clinic settings. Recently, incretin-based pharmacotherapies including glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists alone or combined with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have been developed to target glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. These medications also slow gastric emptying and reduce energy intake. In randomized, placebo-controlled trials of these medications in diabetic and non-diabetic populations with obesity, participants on active medication lost up to 20% of their body weight, with corresponding improvements in blood pressure, lipid levels, physical functioning, and fat mass loss. Their adverse effects are predominantly gastrointestinal-related, mild, and transient. There are trials currently underway within individuals with obesity-related OSA, with a focus on reduction in weight, OSA severity, and cardio-metabolic outcomes. These medications have the potential to substantially disrupt the management of OSA. Pending coming data, we will need to consider pharmacological weight loss as a first-line therapy and how that influences training and management guidelines.

The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at very high risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Current OSA treatments have limited effectiveness in this population. We evaluated the effectiveness of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) to treat OSA in children with Down syndrome. METHODS: Children ages 6-7 years old with Down syndrome and OSA participated in a double-blind crossover clinical trial evaluating two dose regimens of ato-oxy. Participants received low-dose ato-oxy (0.5 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) and high-dose ato-oxy (1.2 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) for 1 month in random order. The primary study outcome was change in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index. Health-related quality of life as measured by the OSA-18 as well as changes in sleep architecture were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen participants qualified for randomization and 11 participants had complete data at all points. Baseline obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 7.4 ± 3.7 (mean ± standard deviation), obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with low-dose ato-oxy was 3.6 ± 3.3 (P = .001 vs baseline), and obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with high-dose ato-oxy was 3.9 ± 2.8 (P = .003 vs baseline). No significant sleep architecture differences were present with ato-oxy. No significant difference in OSA-18 score was present. OSA-18 total score was 51 ± 19 at baseline, 45 ± 17 (P = .09) at the end of 4 weeks of low-dose ato-oxy, and 45 ± 16 (P = .37) at the end of high-dose ato-oxy therapy. The most common adverse effects were irritability and fatigue, and these were generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: Ato-oxy is a promising treatment for OSA in children with Down syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov; Name: Medications for Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Children With Down Syndrome (MOSAIC); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04115878; Identifier: NCT04115878. CITATION: Combs D, Edgin J, Hsu C-H, et al. The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2065-2073.