Female Adults with Patellofemoral Pain Are Characterized by Widespread Hyperalgesia, Which Is Not Affected Immediately by Patellofemoral Joint Loading.

OBJECTIVE: Compare pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at the knee and a site remote to the knee in female adults with patellofemoral pain (PFP) to pain-free controls before and after a patellofemoral joint (PFJ) loading protocol designed to aggravate symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study SETTING: Participants were recruited via advertisements in fitness centers, public places for physical activity and universities. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight females with patellofemoral pain, and 33 female pain-free controls. METHODS: All participant performed a novel PFJ loading protocol involving stair negotiation with an extra load equivalent 35% of body mass. PPTs and current knee pain (measured on a visual analogue scale) was assessed before and after the loading protocol. PPTs were measured at four sites around the knee and one remote site on the upper contralateral limb. RESULTS: Females with PFP demonstrated significantly lower PPTs locally and remote to the knee, both before and after the PFJ loading protocol when compared to control group. Following the loading protocol, PPTs at knee were significantly reduced by 0.54 kgf (95%CI = 0.33; 0.74) for quadriceps tendon, 0.38 kgf (95%CI = 0.14; 0.63) for medial patella, and 0.44 kgf (95%CI = 0.18; 0.69) for lateral patella. No significant change in PPT remote to the knee was observed - 0.10 kgf (95%CI = -0.04; 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Female adults with PFP have local and widespread hyperalgesia compared to pain free controls. A novel loading protocol designed to aggravate symptoms, lowers the PPTs locally at the knee but has no effect on PPT on the upper contralateral limb. This suggests widespread hyperalgesia is not affected by acute symptom aggravation.

Joint Torques and Patellofemoral Force During Single-Leg Assisted and Unassisted Cycling.

CONTEXT: Unassisted single-leg cycling should be replaced by assisted single-leg cycling, given that this last approach has potential to mimic joint kinetics and kinematics from double-leg cycling. However, there is need to test if assisting devices during pedaling effectively replicate joint forces and torque from double-leg cycling. OBJECTIVES: To compare double-leg, single-leg assisted, and unassisted cycling in terms of lower-limb kinetics and kinematics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional crossover. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 14 healthy nonathletes. INTERVENTIONS: Two double-leg cycling trials (240 ± 23 W) and 2 single-leg trials (120 ± 11 W) at 90 rpm were performed for 2 min using a bicycle attached to a cycle trainer. Measurements of pedal force and joint kinematics of participants' right lower limb were performed during double- and single-leg trials. For the single-leg assisted trial, a custom-made adaptor was used to attach 10 kg of weight to the contralateral crank. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak hip, knee, and ankle torques (flexors and extensors) along with knee-flexion angle and peak patellofemoral compressive force. RESULTS: Reduced peak hip-extensor torque (10%) and increased peak knee-flexor torque (157%) were observed at the single-leg assisted cycling compared with the double-leg cycling. No differences were found for peak patellofemoral compressive force or knee-flexion angle comparing double-leg with single-leg assisted cycling. However, single-leg unassisted cycling resulted in larger peak patellofemoral compressive force (28%) and lower knee-flexion angle (3%) than double-leg cycling. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although single-leg assisted cycling differs for joint torques, it replicates knee loads from double-leg cycling.

Validación posoperatoria en la selección asistida por computadora de aloinjertos de fémur distal / Postoperative assessment in computer assisted selection of femur osteoarticular allograft

El objetivo de nuestro trabajo fue comparar dos grupos de pacientes tratados con trasplantes osteoarticulares del fémur distal en términos de evaluar: 1) el volumen del fémur distal del receptor y del trasplante, 2) la superficie articular de contacto del fémur distal del receptor y del trasplante, 3) el ángulo del valgo anatómico femoral del fémur distal del receptor y del trasplante. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una búsqueda retrospectiva entre 2002 y 2012 analizando a pacientes tratados con un trasplante osteoarticular de fémur distal. Se incluyó un total de 32 pacientes. Estos fueron divididos en dos grupos de acuerdo con el método de selección del trasplante: Grupo 1, conformado por 16 pacientes con trasplantes seleccionados mediante tomografía 2D y Grupo 2, 16 pacientes con trasplantes seleccionados a través de un método 3D. La evaluación fue realizada por un observador independiente y ciego para los dos grupos. Resultados: las diferencias en las pruebas de estimación de volumen y superficie articulares entre el donante y el receptor no fueron estadísticamente significativas (p>0,05). Sin embargo, la diferencia entre los ángulos de valgo del fémur receptor y el fémur donante, seleccionados por el método 2D fue significativa (p<0,05), mientras que la diferencia de estos ángulos en el método 3D no lo fue (p>0,05). Conclusión: el método de selección de un aloinjerto, mediante la utilización de un banco de huesos virtual 3D para la reconstrucción con un trasplante osteoarticular de femur distal, permite obtener una mejor alineación del miembro comparado con aquellos seleccionados solo con un método bidimensional. (AU)

The aim of our study was to compare two groups of patients treated with distal femur osteoarticular allograft in terms of: 1) the volume of the distal femur of the allograft and patient, 2) the articular surface contact, 3) the anatomical femoral valgus angle. Material and methods: a retrospective review was performed between 2002 and 2012 and all patients with an osteo-articular allograft of the distal femur were analysed. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the selection method of the allograft: Group 1, 16 patients with allograft selected by 2D (CT) and Group 2, 16 patients selected through a 3D method. The evaluation was done by an independent and blind observer. Results: the differences in terms of volume estimation and joint surface contact between the donor allograft and patient distal femur were not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, the difference between the valgus angle showed significant differences between donor and patient femurs selected by the 2D method (p<0.05) but no difference in the group of patients selected by 3D method (p>0.05). Conclusion: the 3D method for allograft selection of the distal femur showed better results in limb alignment compared to 2D selection method. (AU)

Test de Zohlen y su relación con el ángulo Q en población sin dolor patelofemoral / Zohlen's test and its relation to the Q angle in a population without patellofemoral pain

Determinar qué porcentaje de una población sin dolor anterior de rodilla tiene un test de Zohlen positivo, además determinar el ángulo Q de esta población y buscar si existe alguna relación entre la positividad del test de Zohlen y alteraciones en el ángulo Q. Material y método: Estudio descriptivo-prospectivo observacional. Aplicación del test de Zohlen y medición del ángulo Q. La población se dividió en 2 grupos: test de Zohlen positivo y test de Zohlen negativo. Cuantificación y comparación de medias del ángulo Q en los dos grupos. Resultados: 90 sujetos evaluados, promedio de edad 20,18 años (18-40). Veinte sujetos (22,2 por ciento) con test de Zohlen positivo. Ángulo Q promedio en los sujetos con test de Zohlen negativo: 14,95°; ángulo Q promedio en los sujetos con test de Zohlen positivo: 16,9° (p < 0,05). Ángulo Q promedio en hombres con test de Zohlen negativo 13,4°; ángulo Q promedio en hombres con test de Zohlen positivo: 16° (p < 0,05). Ángulo Q promedio en mujeres con test de Zohlen negativo: 16,5°; ángulo Q promedio en mujeres con test de Zohlen positivo: 18°, sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: El test de Zohlen tiene una correlación positiva con el ángulo Q en sujetos de sexo masculino. Dada la correlación entre un ángulo Q alterado y la presencia de dolor anterior de rodilla, en los pacientes que presentan un test de Zohlen positivo sin haber consultado por dolor anterior de rodilla, la prevención primaria de dolor anterior de rodilla puede ser de utilidad...

To determine the percentage of a population without anterior knee pain with a positive Zohlen test, and also to determine the Q angle of this population and to determine if there is any relationship between the Zohlen test and Q angle anomalies. Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted in which Zohlen¿s test was applied and the Q angle was measured. The population was divided into 2 groups: Zohlen¿s positive and Zohlen¿s negative. Q angle was compared in the 2 groups. Results: The study included 90 subjects, with a mean age 20.18 years (18-40), of whom 20 subjects (22.2 percent) had positive Zohlen¿s test. The mean Q angle in subjects with negative Zohlen¿s test was 14.95°, and the mean Q angle in subjects with positive Zohlen¿s test was 16,9° (p<.05). The mean Q angle in men with negative Zohlen¿s test was 13.4°, and the mean Q angle in men with positive Zohlen¿s test was 16° (p < .05). The mean Q angle in women with negative Zohlen¿s test was 16.5°, with a mean Q angle of 18° in women with positive Zohlen¿s test, with no statistically significant differences found between groups. Conclusions: Zohlen¿s test has a positive correlation with the Q angle in male subjects. Given the correlation between the Q angle and the presence of anterior knee pain in patients who have a positive test without symptoms, primary prevention of anterior knee pain can be achieved...

A biomechanical perspective on physical therapy management of knee osteoarthritis.

SYNOPSIS: Altered knee joint biomechanics and excessive joint loading have long been considered as important contributors to the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, a better understanding of how various treatment options influence the loading environment of the knee joint could have practical implications for devising more effective physical therapy management strategies. The aim of this clinical commentary was to review the pertinent biomechanical evidence supporting the use of treatment options intended to provide protection against excessive joint loading while offering symptomatic relief and functional improvements for better long-term management of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The biomechanical and clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of knee joint offloading strategies, including contralateral cane use, laterally wedged shoe insoles, variable-stiffness shoes, valgus knee bracing, and gait-modification strategies, within the context of effective disease management is discussed. In addition, the potential role of therapeutic exercise and neuromuscular training to improve the mechanical environment of the knee joint is considered. Management strategies for treatment of joint instability and patellofemoral compartment disease are also mentioned. Based on the evidence presented as part of this clinical commentary, it is argued that special considerations for the role of knee joint biomechanics and excessive joint loading are necessary in designing effective short- and long-term management strategies for treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 5.

Evaluating patellar kinematics through magnetic resonance imaging during open- and closed-kinetic-chain exercises.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patellar kinematics of volunteers without knee pain at rest and during isometric contraction in open-and closed-kinetic-chain exercises. METHODS: Twenty individuals took part in this study. All were submitted to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during rest and voluntary isometric contraction (VIC) in the open and closed kinetic chain at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees of knee flexion. Through MRI and using medical e-film software, the following measurements were evaluated: sulcus angle, patellar-tilt angle, and bisect offset. The mixed-effects linear model was used for comparison between knee positions, between rest and isometric contractions, and between the exercises. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that the sulcus angle decreased as knee flexion increased and revealed increases with isometric contractions in both the open and closed kinetic chain for all knee-flexion angles. The patellar-tilt angle decreased with isometric contractions in both the open and closed kinetic chain for every knee position. However, in the closed kinetic chain, patellar tilt increased significantly with the knee flexed at 15 degrees. The bisect offset increased with the knee flexed at 15 degrees during isometric contractions and decreased as knee flexion increased during both exercises. CONCLUSION: VIC in the last degrees of knee extension may compromise patellar dynamics. On the other hand, it is possible to favor patellar stability by performing muscle contractions with the knee flexed at 30 degrees and 45 degrees in either the open or closed kinetic chain.