RESUMEN
Time spent in the operating room is valuable to both surgeons and patients. One of the biggest rate-limiting factors when it comes to arthrodesis procedures of the foot and ankle is cartilage removal and joint preparation. Power instrumentation in joint preparation provides an avenue to decrease joint preparation time, thus decreasing operating room time and costs. Arthrodesis of 47 joints (n) from 27 patients were included. Power rasp joint preparation in 26 joints was compared to traditional osteotome and curette joint preparation in 21 joints in both time (seconds), cost (total operating room time cost per minute), and union rate. The overall mean joint preparation time using power rasp for the subtalar joint was 268.3 seconds, talonavicular joint 212.3 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 142.6 seconds, 1st TMT 107.2 seconds. Mean joint preparation time using traditional method for subtalar joint 509.8 seconds, talonavicular joint 393.0 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 400.0 seconds, 1st TMT 319.6 seconds. Mean cost of joint preparation using power rasp for subtalar joint $165.47, talonavicular joint $130.89, calcaneocuboid joint $87.94, 1st TMT $66.11. Mean cost of joint preparation using traditional techniques for subtalar joint $314.34, talonavicular joint $242.35, calcaneocuboid joint $246.67, 1st TMT $197.33. Overall union rate was 98% (1 asymptomatic non-union). Increasing efficiency in the operating room is vital to every surgeon's practice. Power rasp joint preparation is a viable option to increase efficiency and decrease operative time, this study shows no statistically significant differences in union rate, with comparable rates to existing literature.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis , Tempo Operativo , Humanos , Artrodesis/economía , Artrodesis/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Articulaciones del Pie/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Osteotomía/economía , Osteotomía/métodosRESUMEN
Introducción: El dolor lumbar, constituye un grave problema de salud, en España ocupa el primer puesto como causa de Incapacidad Temporal (IT). Diversos estudios han intentado responder a la cuestión de si compensa realizar intervenciones más intensivas. El objetivo del proyecto es analizar el gasto sanitario ocasionado, valorando los costes de IT al emplear el tratamiento conservador y con tratamiento quirúrgico. Material y Métodos: Estudio prospectivo comparativo entre pacientes con patología degenerativa lumbar tratados quirúrgicamente, y de manera conservadora. Se recogieron la edad y sexo, hábitos tóxicos, tratamiento farmacológico, actividad laboral, los segmentos afectados, y el número de días en situación de IT, con un seguimiento de 3 años. Resultados: Un total de 94 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio (55 pertenecían al grupo control, y 39 al grupo artrodesis). Los pacientes que fueron operados llevaban más días de IT, y entrañaban más costes de IT (p=0,018). Comparando los costes de la intervención quirúrgica para el grupo artrodesis vemos que no existen diferencias entre los pacientes jubilados/ en situación de incapacidad permanente. Después de tres años de seguimiento, el 89,1% del grupo control y el 52,6% del grupo artrodesis recibieron el alta. Conclusión: Los costes de incapacidad transitoria fueron mayores en los pacientes sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico. Los pacientes que no recibieron el alta supusieron mayores costes de IT. En los pacientes que recibieron el alta no hubo diferencias en los costes, descontando el coste del proceso quirúrgico. (AU)
Introduction: Low back pain is a serious health problem, and in Spain it occupies first place as a cause of Temporary Disability (TD). Several studies have tried to answer the question of whether it is worthwhile to carry out more intensive interventions. The project aims to analyze the health care costs incurred, assessing the costs of TD when conservative treatment and surgical treatment are used. Material and methods: Prospective comparative study between patients with lumbar degenerative pathology treated surgically and conservatively. Age and sex, toxic habits, pharmacological treatment, work activity, affected segments, and the number of days on TI were recorded, with a follow-up of 3 years. Results: A total of 94 patients were included in the study (55 belonged to the control group and 39 to the arthrodesis group). Patients who underwent surgery had more days of TD and more TD costs (p=0.018). Comparing the costs of surgery for the arthrodesis group, we see that there are no differences between retired/permanently disabled patients. After three years of follow-up, 89.1% of the control group and 52.6% of the arthrodesis group were discharged. Conclusion: Transitional disability costs were higher in patients who underwent surgical treatment. Patients who were not discharged had higher TD costs. In patients who were discharged, there were no differences in costs, discounting the cost of the surgical process. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Artrodesis/economía , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhabilitación Profesional , Tratamiento ConservadorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to answer the question: Which motion-preserving surgical strategy, (1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty, used for the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis, is the most cost-effective? METHODS: A simulation model was created to model a hypothetical cohort of wrist osteoarthritis patients (mean age, 45 years) presenting with painful wrist and having failed conservative management. Three initial surgical treatment strategies-(1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty-were compared from a hospital perspective. Outcomes included clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years and cost) over a lifetime. RESULTS: The highest complication rates were seen in the four-corner fusion cohort: 27.1 percent compared to 20.9 percent for total wrist arthroplasty and 17.4 percent for proximal row carpectomy. Secondary surgery was common for all procedures: 87 percent for four-corner fusion, 57 percent for proximal row carpectomy, and 46 percent for total wrist arthroplasty. Proximal row carpectomy generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years (30.5) over the lifetime time horizon, compared to 30.3 quality-adjusted life-years for total wrist arthroplasty and 30.2 quality-adjusted life-years for four-corner fusion. Proximal row carpectomy was the least costly; the mean expected lifetime cost for patients starting with proximal row carpectomy was $6003, compared to $11,033 for total wrist arthroplasty and $13,632 for four-corner fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' analysis suggests that proximal row carpectomy was the most cost-effective strategy, regardless of patient and parameter level uncertainties. These are important findings for policy makers and clinicians working within a universal health care system.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/economía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Osteotomía/economía , Articulación de la Muñeca/cirugía , Adulto , Artrodesis/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/métodos , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Osteoartritis/economía , Osteotomía/métodos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Articulación de la Muñeca/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Nonunion after ankle arthrodesis requiring revision is a challenging operative complication, and bone graft substitutes are costly. This study sought to summarize all institutional expenditures related to the revision of an ankle fusion nonunion, presuming that cost and skin-to-skin time would exceed those of the index surgery. The electronic records from 2 foot and ankle centers were reviewed, leading to a list of patients with 2 or more entries for tibiotalar fusions being generated. A total of 24 cases were found to match the criteria. Demographic factors and skin-to-skin time of the remaining patients were compiled. This cohort included 24 patients (6 female and 18 male) with a mean age of 64 years and body mass index of 30.4 kg/m2. Supplemental clinic visits and investigations were included either after computed tomography to assess union or 365 days after index surgery. Total cost of the revision was calculated from billing codes, length of operation, and period of hospitalization. Postrevision outpatient fees were included as well. The revisions were performed open in all cases, and 21 patients received autograft and/or bone substitute. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 3 days. The additional costs (in US dollars) associated with nonunion were $1061 for imaging, $627 for prerevision visits, $3026 for the revision, $3432 for the hospital stay, and $1754 for postrevision follow-up. The total mean amount was $9683, equivalent to 9 nights of acute inpatient stay. Mean index skin-to-skin time was 114 minutes, being 126 minutes for revisions (P=.26). Additional care related to ankle fusion nonunion represents a financial burden equivalent to 9 nights of acute inpatient stay. The use of an orthobiologic would need to be less than $436 to be cost saving. Revision surgery is not significantly longer intraoperatively than index surgery. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e219-e224.].
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis/economía , Sustitutos de Huesos , Reoperación/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Tobillo/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Pie , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background. Hallux rigidus is the most prevalent arthritic condition of the foot. Treatment of end-stage disease traditionally consists of a first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis; however, the use of a synthetic cartilage implant is becoming more common. With the high prevalence of disease and implementation of new treatment modalities, health care consumers should be aware of the costs associated with management. The purpose of this study was to determine access to the cost and variability in price of first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Methods. Forty academic centers were contacted using a standardized patient script. The patient was a 59-year-old female who had failed conservative treatment of hallux rigidus. Each institution was contacted up to 3 times in an attempt to obtain a full bundled operative quote for a first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Results. Twenty centers (50%) provided a quote for first MTPJ arthrodesis and 15 centers (38%) provided a quote for synthetic cartilage implantation. Only 14 centers (35%) were able to provide a quote for both procedures. The mean bundled price for MTPJ arthrodesis was $21 767 (range $8417 to $39 265). The mean bundled price for synthetic cartilage implantation was $21 546 (range $4903 to $74 145). There was no statistically significant difference between the bundled price for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Conclusions. There was limited availability of consumer prices for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic implantation, thus impeding health care consumers' decision making. There was a wide range of quotes for both procedures, indicating potential cost savings.Levels of Evidence: IV, basic science.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Cartílago/trasplante , Costos y Análisis de Costo/economía , Hallux Rigidus/economía , Hallux Rigidus/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Implantación de Prótesis/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis/métodosRESUMEN
Background. First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is the "gold standard" treatment for hallux rigidus. Recently, there has been increased interest in new synthetic cartilage implants to preserve joint motion while eradicating pain. With current health care economics, the cost of a treatment is gaining particular importance. This study set out to perform a cost comparison between MTP arthrodesis and synthetic hydrogel implant to determine which treatment modality is more cost-effective based on direct aggregate costs. Study design. Economic and decision analysis. Methods. Studies in the available literature were analyzed to estimate hardware removal rates for MTP fusion and failure rates for a synthetic hydrogel implant and MTP fusion. Costs were determined by examining direct costs at a single institution for implants and data reported in the literature for operating room time. Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were performed to examine cost and measurement uncertainty. Results. Assuming a 4.76% MTP arthrodesis revision rate and 7.06% hardware removal rate, the total direct cost of MTP joint arthrodesis was $3632. Using a 9.2% failure rate with subsequent conversion to MTP arthrodesis, the total cost of synthetic hydrogel implant was $4565. Sensitivity analysis revealed that MTP fusion was more cost-effective even if the failure rate increased to 15% and synthetic hydrogel implant failure rate was 0%. The synthetic cartilage implant cost would have to be reduced 28% or approximately 200% the cost of MTP fusion implants to be comparable to MTP arthrodesis. Conclusion. Hallux rigidus treatment with a synthetic hydrogel implant resulted in a higher direct aggregate cost than MTP arthrodesis.Level of Evidence: Level II: Cost analysis.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/economía , Hidrogeles , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis/economía , Hallux Rigidus/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Two mainstay surgical options for salvage in scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse are proximal row carpectomy and four-corner arthrodesis. This study evaluates the cost-utility of proximal row carpectomy versus three methods of four-corner arthrodesis for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse/scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed in accordance with the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. A comprehensive literature review was performed to obtain the probability of potential complications. Costs were derived using both societal and health care sector perspectives. A visual analogue scale survey of expert hand surgeons estimated utilities. Overall cost, probabilities, and quality-adjusted life-years were used to complete a decision tree analysis. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty studies yielding 1730 scapholunate advanced collapse/scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists were identified. Decision tree analysis determined that both four-corner arthrodesis with screw fixation and proximal row carpectomy were cost-effective options, but four-corner arthrodesis with screw was the optimal treatment strategy. Four-corner arthrodesis with Kirschner-wire fixation and four-corner arthrodesis with plate fixation were dominated (inferior) strategies and therefore not cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that when the quality-adjusted life-years for a successful four-corner arthrodesis with screw fixation are lower than 26.36, proximal row carpectomy becomes the optimal strategy. However, multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of our model. CONCLUSIONS: Four-corner arthrodesis with screw fixation and proximal row carpectomy are both cost-effective treatment options for scapholunate advanced collapse/scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist because of their lower complication profile and high efficacy, with four-corner arthrodesis with screw as the most cost-effective treatment. Four-corner arthrodesis with plate and Kirschner-wire fixation should be avoided from a cost-effectiveness standpoint.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Osteotomía/economía , Traumatismos de la Muñeca/cirugía , Artrodesis/efectos adversos , Artrodesis/instrumentación , Artrodesis/métodos , Tornillos Óseos/economía , Huesos del Carpo/lesiones , Fracturas no Consolidadas/economía , Humanos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Traumatismos de la Muñeca/economía , Articulación de la Muñeca/fisiología , Articulación de la Muñeca/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background. Hindfoot fusion procedures are increasingly being performed in the outpatient setting. However, the cost savings of these procedures compared with the risks and benefits has not been clearly investigated. The objective of this study was to compare patient characteristics, costs, and short-term complications between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent inpatient and outpatient hindfoot fusion procedures by a single surgeon, at 1 academic institution, from 2013 to 2017. Data collected included demographics, operative variables, comorbidities, complications, costs, and subsequent reencounters. Results. Of 124 procedures, 34 were inpatient and 90 were outpatient. Between procedural settings, with the numbers available, there was no significant increase in complication rate or frequency of reencounters within 90 days. There were no significant differences in the number of patients with reencounters related to the index procedure within 90 days (P = .43). There were 30 reencounters within 90 days after outpatient surgery versus 4 after inpatient surgery (P = .05). The total number of emergency room visits in the outpatient group within 90 days was significantly higher compared with the inpatient group (P = .04). The average cost for outpatient procedures was US$4159 less than inpatient procedures (P < .0001). Conclusion. Outpatient hindfoot fusion may be a safe alternative to inpatient surgery, with significant overall cost savings and similar rate of short-term complications. On the basis of these findings, we believe that outpatient management is preferable for the majority of patients, but further investigation is warranted. Levels of Evidence: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis/economía , Artrodesis/métodos , Ahorro de Costo , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Pie/cirugía , Pacientes Internos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding optimal primary management of Lisfranc injuries. Whether open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis is superior remains unknown. METHODS: A national insurance database of approximately 23.5 million orthopedic patients was retrospectively queried for subjects who were diagnosed with a Lisfranc injury from 2007 to 2016 based on international classification of diseases (ICD) codes (PearlDiver, Colorado Springs, CO). Patients with lisfranc injuries then progressed to either nonoperative treatment, ORIF, or primary arthrodesis. Associated treatment costs were determined along with complication rate and hardware removal rate. RESULTS: 2205 subjects with a diagnosis of Lisfranc injury were identified in the database. 1248 patients underwent nonoperative management, 670 underwent ORIF, and 212 underwent primary arthrodesis. The average cost of care associated with primary arthrodesis was greater ($5005.82) than for ORIF ($3961.97,P = 0.045). The overall complication rate was 23.1% (155/670) for ORIF and 30.2% (64/212) for primary arthrodesis (P = 0.04). Rates of hardware removal were 43.6% (292/670) for ORIF and 18.4% (39/212) for arthrodesis (P < 0.001). Furthermore, 2.5% (17/670) patients in the ORIF group progressed to arthrodesis at a mean of 308 days, average cost of care associated with this group of patients was $9505.12. DISCUSSION: Primary arthrodesis is both significantly more expensive and has a higher complication rate than ORIF. Open reduction and internal fixation demonstrated a low rate of progression to arthrodesis, although there was a high rate of hardware removal, which may represent a planned second procedure in the management of a substantial number of patients treated with ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Articulaciones del Pie/cirugía , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta , Artrodesis/economía , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Pies/economía , Articulaciones del Pie/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/economía , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Reducción Abierta/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE Recommendations for the surgical treatment of isolated lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (i.e., in the absence of concomitant scoliosis or spondylolisthesis) are unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate trends in the surgical treatment of isolated LSS in US adults and determine implications for outcomes. METHODS The authors analyzed inpatient and outpatient claims from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for 20,279 patients aged 40-64 years who underwent surgery for LSS between 2010 and 2014. Only patients with continuous 12-month insurance coverage after surgery were included. The rates of decompression with arthrodesis versus decompression only and of simple (1- or 2-level, single-approach) versus complex (> 2-level or combined-approach) arthrodesis were analyzed by year and geographic region. These trends were further analyzed with respect to complications, length of hospital stay, payments made to the hospital, and patient discharge status. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS The proportion of patients who underwent decompression with arthrodesis compared with decompression only increased significantly and linearly from 2010 to 2014 (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.06-1.10). Arthrodesis was more likely to be complex rather than simple with each subsequent year (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.33-1.49). This trend was accompanied by an increased likelihood of postoperative complications (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.21), higher costs (payments increased by a mean of US$1633 per year; 95% CI 1327-1939), and greater likelihood of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility as opposed to home (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.20). The South and Midwest regions of the US had the highest proportions of patients undergoing arthrodesis (48% and 42%, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay did not change significantly (p = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS From 2010 to 2014, the proportion of adults undergoing decompression with arthrodesis versus decompression only for the treatment of LSS increased, especially in the South and Midwest regions of the US. A greater proportion of these fusions were complex and were associated with more complications, higher costs, and a greater likelihood of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/tendencias , Descompresión Quirúrgica/tendencias , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Adulto , Artrodesis/economía , Artrodesis/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/economía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estenosis Espinal/economía , Estenosis Espinal/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Hammertoe deformities are one of the most common foot deformities, affecting up to one third of the general population. Fusion of the joint can be achieved with various devices, with the current focus on percutaneous Kirschner (K)-wire fixation or commercial intramedullary implant devices. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether surgical intervention with percutaneous K-wire fixation versus commercial intramedullary implant is more cost effective for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in hammertoe surgery. A formal cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analytic tree model was conducted to investigate the healthcare costs and outcomes associated with either K-wire or commercial intramedullary implant fixation. The outcomes assessed included long-term costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost per QALY gained. Costs were evaluated from the healthcare system perspective and are expressed in U.S. dollars at a 2017 price base. Our results found that commercial implants were minimally more effective than K-wires but carried significantly higher costs. The total cost for treatment with percutaneous K-wire fixation was $5041 with an effectiveness of 0.82 QALY compared with a commercial implant cost of $6059 with an effectiveness of 0.83 QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of commercial implants was $146,667. With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of >$50,000, commercial implants failed to justify their proposed benefits to outweigh their cost compared to percutaneous K-wire fixation. In conclusion, percutaneous K-wire fixation would be preferred for arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint for hammertoes from a healthcare system perspective.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Artrodesis/instrumentación , Hilos Ortopédicos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Síndrome del Dedo del Pie en Martillo/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes/economía , Artrodesis/métodos , Hilos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo , Árboles de Decisión , Síndrome del Dedo del Pie en Martillo/diagnóstico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the health economics and outcomes of three common foot and ankle operations. METHODS: Between July 2013 and October 2014 all patients undergoing ankle fusion (AF) for osteoarthritis, first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion for osteoarthritis (MF) or hallux valgus surgery (HV) were included. Patients having additional procedures were excluded. Patients completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ), the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the EQ-VAS on presentation and at least 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: 63 patients undergoing AF (n=22), MF (n=22), or HV (n=32) completed preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. 76 completed preoperative questionnaires and 63 completed the follow up questionnaires. The follow up questionnaires were completed at a median of 12 months (range 6-24 months) following surgery. The mean age at surgery was 59 years (range 26-85 years). Pre-operative MOX-FQ and EQ-5D-5L scores differed significantly between the three groups with AF and MF patients reporting worse scores compared to HV patients. MOX-FQ and EQ-5D-5L significantly improved in all groups from pre-operative levels. MOX-FQ: AF from 53.8 (CI 56.8-50.8) to 22.9 (CI 30.9-14.9), MF from 43.0 (CI 46.4-39.6) to 12.1 (CI 18.3-5.9), HV from 35.4 (CI 39.0-31.7) to 15.6 (CI 21.1-10.1). EQ-5D-5L: AF from 0.30 (CI 0.43-0.17) to 0.66 (CI 0.77-0.55), MF from 0.45(CI 0.52-0.38) to 0.83 (CI 0.90-0.76), HV from 0.71(CI 0.74-0.68) to 0.82 (CI 0.88-0.76). There was no significant difference in the EQ-VAS suggesting it may not be representative of foot and ankle health. Health economics analysis using the EQ-5D-5L data to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) suggested all three procedures were favourable compared to threshold levels of cost-effectiveness. There were differences in estimated costs between the three operations with AF at £2950 (threshold cost <£5400) and MF at £1197 (threshold cost <£5780) and HV varying from £625 to £1688 (threshold cost <£1640). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that the joint-specific (MOX-FQ) and generic health (EQ-5D-5L) outcome scores of patients improved after AF, MF and HV. The greatest benefit from surgery was gained in the arthritic patient groups. In the future, the use of large population patient reported outcome measures data may also potentially have implications for prioritisation of healthcare provision, acting as an indicator of foot and ankle surgical procedures that produce the most benefit to patients.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis , Hallux Valgus/cirugía , Hallux/cirugía , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/cirugía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artrodesis/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hallux Valgus/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE Given the increasing prevalence of obesity, more patients with a high body mass index (BMI) will require surgical treatment for degenerative spinal disease. In previous investigations of lumbar spine pathology, obesity has been associated with worsened postoperative outcomes and increased costs. However, few studies have examined the association between BMI and postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes, postoperative narcotics consumption, complications, and hospital costs among BMI stratifications for patients who have undergone primary 1- to 2-level ACDF procedures. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained surgical database of patients who had undergone primary 1- to 2-level ACDF for degenerative spinal pathology between 2008 and 2015. Patients were stratified by BMI as follows: normal weight (< 25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), or obese II-III (≥ 35.0 kg/m2). Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were compared across the BMI cohorts using 1-way ANOVA or chi-square analysis. Multivariate linear or Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine the presence of an association between BMI category and narcotics utilization, improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores, incidence of complications, arthrodesis rates, reoperation rates, and hospital costs. Regression analyses were controlled for preoperative demographic and procedural characteristics. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the analysis, of whom 20.9% (n = 58) were normal weight, 37.5% (n = 104) were overweight, 24.9% (n = 69) were obese I, and 16.6% (n = 46) were obese II-III. A higher BMI was associated with an older age (p = 0.049) and increased comorbidity burden (p = 0.001). No differences in sex, smoking status, insurance type, diagnosis, presence of neuropathy, or preoperative VAS pain scores were found among the BMI cohorts (p > 0.05). No significant differences were found among these cohorts as regards operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and number of operative levels (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences in postoperative narcotics consumption, VAS score improvement, complication rates, arthrodesis rates, reoperation rates, or total direct costs existed across BMI stratifications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with a higher BMI demonstrated surgical outcomes, narcotics consumption, and hospital costs comparable to those of patients with a lower BMI. Thus, ACDF procedures are both safe and effective for all patients across the entire BMI spectrum. Patients should be counseled to expect similar rates of postoperative complications and eventual clinical improvement regardless of their BMI.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Discectomía/economía , Costos de Hospital , Narcóticos/economía , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Artrodesis/economía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Comorbilidad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Discectomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Obesidad/economía , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/cirugía , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether surgical intervention with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA) for Lisfranc injuries is more cost effective. We conducted a formal cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model and decision tree to explore the healthcare costs and health outcomes associated with a scenario of ORIF versus PA for 45 years postoperatively. The outcomes assessed included long-term costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost per QALY gained. The costs were evaluated from the healthcare system perspective and are expressed in U.S. dollars at a 2017 price base. ORIF was always associated with greater costs compared with PA and was less effective in the long term. When calculating the cost required to gain 1 additional QALY, the PA group cost $1429/QALY and the ORIF group cost $3958/QALY. The group undergoing PA overall spent, on average, $43,192 less than the ORIF group, and PA was overall a more effective technique. Strong dominance compared with ORIF was demonstrated in multiple scenarios, and the model's conclusions were unchanged in the sensitivity analysis even after varying the key assumptions. ORIF failed to show functional or financial benefits. In conclusion, from a healthcare system's standpoint, PA would clearly be the preferred treatment strategy for predominantly ligamentous Lisfranc injuries and dislocations.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Traumatismos de los Pies/economía , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/cirugía , Artrodesis/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Traumatismos de los Pies/diagnóstico por imagen , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/economía , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Ligamentos Articulares/lesiones , Ligamentos Articulares/cirugía , Cadenas de Markov , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/lesiones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We conducted a population-level analysis comparing proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and partial wrist arthrodesis (PWA) for treatment of chronic wrist arthritis to (1) characterize national practice patterns, (2) determine the rate of conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (TWA), and (3) calculate the associated direct cost of care. METHODS: Using the Truven MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2015, we identified patients 18 years or older with a diagnosis of wrist osteoarthritis who had a PRC or PWA and were followed for 18 months. We used Chi-square analysis and multivariable logistic regression to examine patient characteristics associated with conversion to a TWA. Rates of repeat PWA were also obtained, including the total number of procedures until completion and direct treatment cost. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,388 eligible patients, 1,305 had a PRC (39%) and 2,083 had a PWA (61%). In patients 54 years of age or younger, PWA was more commonly performed than PRC (49% vs 38%). The TWA rates were significantly higher for patients of all ages who underwent PWA (19.2%) versus PRC (4.9%). Those undergoing PWA required more total procedures than patients who received a PRC (average, 1.7 vs 1.1) resulting in a greater average direct cost per patient ($10,842 vs $7,171). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion rates to a TWA are significantly higher with a PWA (19.2%) than with a PRC (4.9%) and have a greater associated direct cost. This includes younger patients, who in the past were considered better candidates for PWA. Our findings suggest that surgeons may need to reevaluate their indications for PWA and that there may need to be a paradigm shift in the current practice patterns for salvage treatment of wrist arthrosis, more often considering PRC for all age groups. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Articulación de la Muñeca , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Artrodesis/efectos adversos , Artrodesis/economía , Costos Directos de Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the epidemiology of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture submitted to surgery at Hospital Cristo Redentor and the related costs. Methods: Prospective epidemiological study between July 2014 and August 2015 of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture with indication of surgery. The variables analyzed were sex, age, cost of hospitalization, fractured levels, levels of arthrodesis, surgical site infection, UTI or BCP, spinal cord injury, etiology, length of stay, procedure time, and visual analog scale (VAS) . Results: Thirty-two patients were evaluated in the study period, with a mean age of 38.68 years. Male-female ratio was 4:1 and the most frequent causes were fall from height (46.87%) and traffic accidents (46.87%). The thoracolumbar transition was the most affected (40.62%), with L1 vertebra involved in 23.8% of the time. Neurological deficit was present in 40.62% of patients. Hospital stay had a median of 14 days and patients with neurological deficit were hospitalized for a longer period (p<0.001), with an increase in hospital costs (p= 0.015). The average cost of hospitalization was U$2,874.80. The presence of BCP increased the cost of hospitalization, and patients with spinal cord injury had more BCP (p= 0.014) . Conclusion: Public policies with an emphasis on reducing traffic accidents and falls can help reduce the incidence of these injuries and studies focusing on hospital costs and rehabilitation need to be conducted in Brazil to determinate the burden of spinal trauma and spinal cord injury.
RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever a epidemiologia dos pacientes com fratura de coluna toracolombar submetidos à cirurgia no Hospital Cristo Redentor e os custos relacionados. Métodos: Estudo epidemiológico prospectivo entre julho de 2014 e agosto de 2015 de pacientes com fratura da coluna toracolombar com indicação de cirurgia. Foram analisadas as variáveis sexo, idade, custo da internação hospitalar, níveis fraturados, níveis de artrodese, infecção de sítio cirúrgico, ITU ou BCP, lesão medular, etiologia, dias de internação, tempo de procedimento e escala visual analógica (EVA) . Resultados: Foram avaliados 32 pacientes no período estudado, com média de idade de 38,68 anos. A relação entre homens e mulheres foi 4:1 e as causas mais frequentes foram queda de altura (46,87%) e acidentes de trânsito (46,87%). A transição toracolombar foi a mais acometida (40,62%) com a vértebra de L1 envolvida em 23,8% das vezes. Apresentaram déficit neurológico 40,62% dos pacientes. O tempo de permanência hospitalar teve mediana de 14 dias e os pacientes com déficit neurológico permaneceram internados por período mais prolongado (p <0,001), com aumento dos custos hospitalares (p= 0,015). O custo médio da internação foi de U$ 2.874,80. A presença de BCP aumentou o custo da internação e os pacientes com lesão medular tiveram mais BCP (p= 0,014). Conclusão: Políticas públicas com ênfase na redução de acidentes de trânsito e quedas podem ajudar a reduzir a incidência dessas lesões e estudos com foco nos gastos hospitalares e em reabilitação precisam ser realizados no Brasil para determinar o fardo socioeconômico do traumatismo vertebral e traumatismo medular.
RESUMEN Objetivo : Describir la epidemiología de los pacientes con fractura de columna toracolumbar sometidos a cirugía en el Hospital Cristo Redentor y los costos relacionados. Métodos : Estudio epidemiológico prospectivo entre julio de 2014 y agosto de 2015 de pacientes con fracturas de la columna toracolumbar con indicación de cirugía. Se analizaron las variables sexo, edad, costo de hospitalización, niveles fracturados, niveles de artrodesis, infección del sitio quirúrgico, ITU o BCP, lesión de la médula espinal, etiología, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, tiempo del procedimiento y la escala visual analógica (EVA). Resultados: Fueron evaluados 32 pacientes durante el período de estudio, con un promedio de edad de 38,68 años. La relación entre hombres y mujeres fue de 4:1 y las causas más frecuentes fueron las caídas de altura (46,87%) y los accidentes de tránsito (46,87%). La transición toracolumbar fue la más afectada (40,62%) con la vértebra de L1 involucrada en 23,8% de los casos. Presentaron déficit neurológico 40,62% de los pacientes. La estancia hospitalaria tuvo mediana de 14 días y los pacientes con déficit neurológico permanecieron hospitalizados por un período más largo (p <0,001), con un aumento de los gastos de hospital (p= 0,015). El costo promedios de hospitalización fue de U$ 2.874,80. La presencia de BCP aumentó el costo de la hospitalización y los pacientes con lesión de la médula espinal tuvieron más BCP (p= 0,014) . Conclusión : Políticas públicas, con énfasis en la reducción de los accidentes de tránsito y las caídas pueden ayudar a reducir la incidencia de estas lesiones y los estudios centrados en los costos hospitalarios y de rehabilitación deben ser llevados a cabo en Brasil para determinar la carga socioeconómica del trauma espinal y la lesión de médula espinal.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Artrodesis/economía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Different surgical techniques are available to correct each type of Hallux Valgus (HV) deformity, and all present similar good results. No information is available relative to the cost of each technique compared to their individual success. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness-ratio (CER) of five different techniques for HV. METHODS: We included 245HV surgeries performed in 179 patients. The severity was defined according to radiological parameters. For mild to moderate HV we included the Chevron, Modified-Scarf and Ludloff techniques; for severe HV: either Poscow-osteotomy or Lapidus-arthrodesis fixed with plates or screws. Weighted costs were estimated. CER was expressed in $US dollars per AOFAS-point. RESULTS: The lowest weighted cost was observed for the Chevron-group, and the highest weighted cost was observed in the Poscow-osteotomy and Lapidus-arthrodesis fixed with plate groups. The AOFAS-score improvement was higher in the Chevron and Modified-Scarf groups. The CER found for Chevron and Modified-Scarf techniques were significantly less than for Poscow and Lapidus-techniques. CONCLUSION: Cost-Effectiveness-Ratio was lower, and therefore better, in the groups with mild to moderate deformities operated with Chevron or Modified-Scarf techniques. In severe HV, the three techniques investigated presented similar CER. CER analysis is an additional factor that can be included in the decision making analysis in hallux valgus surgery. Level of Evidence Level IV, Retrospective Study.
Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/economía , Artrodesis/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Hallux Valgus/cirugía , Osteotomía/economía , Osteotomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hallux Valgus/diagnóstico por imagen , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the rate and variation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related hand and wrist surgery among Medicare (elderly) beneficiaries in the United States, and to identify the patient and provider factors that influence surgical rates. METHODS: Using the 2006-2010 100% Medicare claims data of beneficiaries with RA diagnosis, we examined rates of rheumatoid hand and wrist arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and hand tendon reconstruction in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine variation in receipt of surgery by patient and regional characteristics (density of providers, intensity of use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs). RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, the annual rate of RA-related hand and wrist arthroplasty or arthrodesis was 23.1 per 10,000 patients, and the annual rate of hand tendon reconstruction was 4.2 per 10,000 patients. The rates of surgery varied 9-fold across hospital referral regions in the United States. Younger patient age, female sex, white race, higher socioeconomic status (SES), and rural residence were associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing arthroplasty and arthrodesis. We observed a significant decline in rate of arthroplasty and arthrodesis with increasing density of rheumatologists. Tendon reconstruction was not influenced by provider factors, but was correlated with age, race, SES, and rural status of the patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical reconstruction of rheumatoid hand deformities varies widely across the United States, driven by both regional availability of subspecialty care in rheumatology and individual patient factors.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/cirugía , Articulaciones de la Mano/cirugía , Medicare , Articulación de la Muñeca/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Artrodesis/economía , Artroplastia/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) are accessible to patients with end-stage hip and knee arthritis in most health care systems. The availability of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to patients with end-stage ankle arthritis is often restricted because of prosthesis cost. Ankle fusion (AF) is often offered as the only alternative. Patients should have equal access to procedures that are equivalent in total cost. We compared total costs of TAA, AF, THA, and TKA for similar cohorts in a government-funded teaching hospital. METHODS: A subset of 13 TAA and 13 AF patients were selected from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Prospective Ankle Reconstruction Database, and 13 THA and 13 TKA patients were randomly selected from the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Total cost was estimated from operating room time, hospital stay, surgeon billing, and equipment used. RESULTS: Mean total cost associated with TAA was $13,500 ± 1000 and was the same as THA ($14,500 ± 1500) and TKA ($12,500 ± 1000). Mean total cost associated with AF was significantly less at $5500 ± 500. Mean operating room time was longer, but mean hospital stay was shorter for the ankle procedures compared with THA and TKA. CONCLUSION: All arthroplasties had similar total costs. Total ankle arthroplasty should not be denied based on prosthetic cost alone, as total procedure cost is equivalent to THA and TKA. We believe ankle fusion is a less expensive and preferable alternative for some patient groups.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Costos de Hospital , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Longer length of stay in the hospital after elective surgery results in increased use of health-care resources and higher costs. Improved perioperative care permits many foot and ankle surgical procedures to be performed as day surgery. This study determined perioperative factors associated with a longer length of stay after elective total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients who underwent open or arthroscopic ankle fusion or total ankle replacement for end-stage ankle arthritis at our institution from 2003 to 2010. Univariate and multivariable generalized linear regression models with gamma distribution and log link function were conducted with use of the length of the hospital stay as the dependent variable and preselected risk factors of age, sex, physical and mental functional scores, comorbid factors, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, body mass index, type of surgery, duration of surgery, and surgery day of the week as the independent variables. RESULTS: This study included 343 patients with a median length of stay of seventy-five hours (interquartile range, fifty-two to ninety-seven hours). With use of regression analyses, the variables of age, female sex, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, multiple medical comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis, lower Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary and General Health domain scores, and open surgery were significantly associated with increased length of stay. Conversely, the variables of obesity, Short Form-36 Mental Component Summary score, surgery day of the week, and surgical duration were not associated with length of stay. Two predictive models of the length of stay were developed: one included only patient-related factors, and the other included patient and surgery-related factors. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who are identified with a higher risk of a longer length of stay may warrant better education and more focused perioperative care when designing care pathways and allocating health-care resources.