CT Arthrography of the Elbow: What Radiologists Should Know.

Computed tomography (CT) arthrography is a quickly available imaging modality to investigate elbow disorders. Its excellent spatial resolution enables the detection of subtle pathologic changes of intra-articular structures, which makes this technique extremely valuable in a joint with very tiny chondral layers and complex anatomy of articular capsule and ligaments. Radiation exposure has been widely decreased with the novel CT scanners, thereby increasing the indications of this examination. The main applications of CT arthrography of the elbow are the evaluation of capsule, ligaments, and osteochondral lesions in both the settings of acute trauma, degenerative changes, and chronic injury due to repeated microtrauma and overuse. In this review, we discuss the normal anatomic findings, technical tips for injection and image acquisition, and pathologic findings that can be encountered in CT arthrography of the elbow, shedding light on its role in the diagnosis and management of different orthopedic conditions. We aspire to offer a roadmap for the integration of elbow CT arthrography into routine clinical practice, fostering improved patient outcomes and a deeper understanding of elbow pathologies.

Arthrographic description of the canine carpal joint cavities and its recesses.

Joint effusion is diagnostically important. The canine carpal joint effusion, which is sometimes difficult to detect clinically, has received less attention in diagnostic ultrasound (US) studies. The aim of the present study was to provide a description of the morphological appearance of the canine carpal joint cavities and recesses using US, radiography, helical computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional volume rendering technique (3D-VRT) images and to prove the applicability of musculoskeletal US for the detection of artificial carpal joint effusion in dogs. The understanding of the characteristics of these structures in normal patients is essential in the diagnosis. Twenty-eight clinically and radiologically unremarkable canine carpal cadavers of different breeds were examined, representative images were selected and anatomical structures were labelled. The canine carpal joint cavities and in particular its recesses had a complex appearance with a basic structure found in all dogs: Antebrachiocarpal joint: dorsoproximal antebrachiocarpal recess, dorsodistal antebrachiocarpal recess, medial antebrachiocarpal recess, lateral antebrachiocarpal recess and five palmar antebrachiocarpal recesses. Middle carpal joint: two dorsal middle carpal recesses, medial common middle carpal and carpometacarpal recess, lateral common middle carpal and carpometacarpal recess, four palmar middle carpal recesses. The carpometacarpal joint had dorsal and palmar funnel-shaped and irregular, finely tubular extensions, the most prominent ran dorsal to metacarpal III, the maximum distal end represented the proximal metacarpal diaphysis. All recesses presented ultrasonographically as a generalized anechogenic to hypoechoic filled continuation of the articular capsule with an indistinct peripheral hypoechogenic to isoechogenic fine capsule, the synovial-connective tissue interface was difficult to identify. The novel results of this study provide the first morphological description of the ultrasonographic, radiographic and computed tomographic arthrographic appearance of the canine carpal joint cavities and recesses with different injection volumes. The canine carpal joint cavities and in particular its recesses had a complex appearance with a basic structure found in all dogs. The applicability of musculoskeletal US to visualize an artificial carpal effusion has been demonstrated. The results of this study, and in particular US, give the practitioner an advantage in visualizing joint effusion and assist in the decision to perform arthrocentesis.

Value of MR arthrography for evaluation of children and adolescents with clinically suspected intraarticular cause of hip pain.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution of intra- and extraarticular MRI findings in children and adolescents with clinically suspected intraarticular cause of hip pain in order to assess the need for additional intraarticular contrast administration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Database was searched over a period of 34 months retrospectively for consecutive hip MR arthrography in young patients (8-17 years) with suspected intraarticular cause of hip or groin pain. Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, follow-up examination due to known intraarticular pathology, incomplete examination, qualitatively non-diagnostic examinations, and missing informed consent. Reports of fellowship-trained MSK radiologists were searched for intraarticular versus extraarticular findings explaining hip or groin pain. RESULTS: Seventy patients (68% female; median age: 14.5 years; range:10.8-16.9 years) were analyzed. No reason for pain was found in 30 (42.9%) hips, extraarticular reasons in 20 (28.6%) cases, intraarticular in 14 (20.0%), and both (intra- and extraarticular) in 6 (8.6%) hips. Most common extraarticular reasons were apophysitis (14.3%), other bony stress reactions (12.9%), intramuscular edema (7%), tendinitis (5.7%), and trochanteric bursitis (4.3%). Labral pathology was the most common intraarticular finding (overall:34.3%; partial tear:15.7%, complete tear:15.7%), most frequent at the anterosuperior position (81.8%). Cartilage defects (1.4%), intraarticular neoplasia (1.4%), and tear of the femoral head ligament (2.8%) were rarely found. Synovitis and loose bodies were not observed. Cam-(37.1%) and pincer-configurations (47.1%) were common while hip dysplasia was rare (5.7%). CONCLUSION: MRI in children and adolescents with hip pain should be done primarily without intraarticular contrast administration since most cases show an extraarticular pain reason or no diagnosis detectable with MRI.

Ankle, knee, and elbow arthrography: 2022 survey of Society of Skeletal Radiology members.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the preferred ankle, knee, and elbow arthrography injection techniques for Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) members and whether more recently described techniques are gaining acceptance. We also sought to determine whether the concept of knowledge translation might explain differences between the preferred technique, year of fellowship graduation, and year the newer technique was described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 29-question survey was created in Qualtrics and submitted to current SSR members to determine if they perform knee, elbow, and ankle arthrography, and if so, the year of fellowship completion and preferred approaches. Survey respondents indicated the starting and ending needle tip positions for three knee, two elbow, and three ankle arthrography approaches using grids placed over provided frontal and lateral radiographs. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four SSR members (mean post-fellowship 13 years; range 0-38) completed the survey and performed fluoroscopic-guided knee (93%), elbow (95%), and ankle (75%) arthrography. Preferred approaches included the following: knee lateral subpatellar (43%), anterior (40%); elbow radiocapitellar (74%); ankle anterior/peritendon (70%), lateral mortise (24%). Preference of newer technique was related to fellowship graduation year and publication year for the ankle mortise (26% before, 42% after; p = 0.03) and posterior trans-triceps elbow articles (19% before, 33% after; p < 0.01). The anterior knee approach preference increased from 11% in 2008 to 40% (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nearly twice as many SSR members who graduated after the posterior trans-triceps and ankle mortise techniques were published prefer them for performing arthrography, possibly due to knowledge translation. The preference of the anterior knee arthrography approach has increased nearly fourfold since 2008.

Diagnosis of medial meniscal lesions in the canine stifle using multidetector computed tomographic positive-contrast arthrography.

OBJECTIVE: To assess diagnostic value and clinical utility of multidetector computed tomographic positive contrast arthrography (CTA) for meniscal lesions in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. STUDY POPULATION: Client-owned dogs (n = 55) with cranial cruciate ligament injuries. METHODS: Sedated dogs underwent CTA using a 16-slice scanner, and subsequently received mini-medial arthrotomy for meniscal assessment. Scans were anonymized, randomized, and reviewed twice for meniscal lesions by three independent observers with varying experience. Results were compared with surgical findings. Reproducibility and repeatability were assessed with kappa statistics, intraobserver changes in diagnosis by McNemar's test, and interobserver differences using Cochran's Q test. Test performance was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, proportion correctly identified, and positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Analysis was based on 52 scans from 44 dogs. Sensitivity for identifying meniscal lesions was 0.62-1.00 and specificity was 0.70-0.96. Intraobserver agreement was 0.50-0.78, and interobserver agreement was 0.47-0.83. There was a significant change between readings one and two for the least experienced observers (p < .05). The sum of sensitivity and specificity exceeded 1.5 for both readings and all observers. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance was suitable for identifying meniscal lesions. An effect of experience and learning was seen in this study.

SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography.

OBJECTIVE: Direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) is often considered the most accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of intra-articular structures, but utilization and performance vary widely without consensus. The purpose of this white paper is to develop consensus recommendations on behalf of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) based on published literature and expert opinion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Standards and Guidelines Committee of the SSR identified guidelines for utilization and performance of dMRA as an important topic for study and invited all SSR members with expertise and interest to volunteer for the white paper panel. This panel was tasked with determining an outline, reviewing the relevant literature, preparing a written document summarizing the issues and controversies, and providing recommendations. RESULTS: Twelve SSR members with expertise in dMRA formed the ad hoc white paper authorship committee. The published literature on dMRA was reviewed and summarized, focusing on clinical indications, technical considerations, safety, imaging protocols, complications, controversies, and gaps in knowledge. Recommendations for the utilization and performance of dMRA in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot regions were developed in group consensus. CONCLUSION: Although direct MR arthrography has been previously used for a wide variety of clinical indications, the authorship panel recommends more selective application of this minimally invasive procedure. At present, direct MR arthrography remains an important procedure in the armamentarium of the musculoskeletal radiologist and is especially valuable when conventional MRI is indeterminant or results are discrepant with clinical evaluation.

The 2D and 3D MR arthrographic description of aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon and biceps tendon anomaly in a large patient cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon (AEST) and biceps tendon abnormalities with magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic examinations and determine their prevalence in patients, we performed a high-resolution 3D direct MR arthrography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 700 shoulder MR arthrograms performed between May 2010 and January 2022. Extension in the coronal plane of an AEST on 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography was identified. Based on its morphology, the AEST on MR arthrography was divided into four subtypes: absence of tendinous thickness in the bicipital synovial surface or intra-synovial tendon-like structure in the bicipital groove, thin and flat tendinous thickness ≥1 mm of bicipital synovium, oval tendinous structure less than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, oval tendinous structure more than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, and oval tendinous structure larger than the adjacent biceps tendon. Based on its origin and termination, aponeurotic expansions can be divided into three subtypes: proximal pulley zone, middle humeral neck zone, and distal myotendinous junction zone. Association with the biceps synovium of the AEST was categorized into three types: intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial. RESULTS: An AEST in the anterior shoulder joint in 3D VIBE MR arthrography images was identified in 63 (9%) of 700 arthrograms. The most common arthrographic type of AEST was type 1-this was detected in 39 of 63 patients. The most common course type of the AEST was anteriorly midline. The most common distal insertion type was at the tenosynovial sheath of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in the middle humeral neck zone-this was detected in 31 of 63 patients. There were only 10 MR arthrograms biceps tendon abnormality, including 4 biceps agenesis and 6 split ruptures. CONCLUSION: A 2D and high-resolution 3D MR arthrography can demonstrate the anatomical detail around the bicipital groove and facilitate the differentiation between a biceps tendon anomaly and an AEST. On high-resolution 3D MR arthrographic images, the AEST tends to be in the anterior midline and anteromedial portions of the biceps synovium with intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial courses and its three different insertion types.

Semiquantitative index of symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow at CT arthrography (SMILE index): clinical applicability and reproducibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of a semiquantitative index for symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow (SMILE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT arthrograms of consecutive patients with lateral elbow pain who underwent ultrasound-guided CT arthrography at our orthopedic center between April 2019 and May 2022 were included. Images were acquired at 100 kVp and 80 mAs. An expert radiologist (R1) and a radiology resident (R2) retrospectively performed an independent, blinded evaluation of the arthrograms to assess the presence of imaging findings suggestive of elbow instability. The SMILE index (0-8) was obtained adding (I) radial head chondromalacia (0 - 1); (II) humeral capitellum chondromalacia (0 - 1); (III) humeral trochlear ridge chondromalacia (0 - 1); (IV) annular ligament laxity (0 - 2); (V) synovial thickening (0 - 1); (VI) humeroradial joint asymmetry (0 - 1); and (VII) capsular tear (0 - 1). R1 repeated the assessment after 14 days. Cohen's weighted κ statistic and raw concordance were used to appraise reproducibility. RESULTS: Eighty patients (median age 49 years, interquartile range 40-53 years, 49, 61% males) underwent CT arthrography at our center, and 10 (12%) of them underwent bilateral elbow examination, leading to 90 included CT arthrograms. Median SMILE index was 4 (IQR: 2-5) for R1, 4 (IQR: 2-5) for R2, and 4 (IQR: 2-5) for the second assessment by R1. Intra-reader agreement was excellent (κ = 0.94, concordance 87%), while inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75, concordance 67%). CONCLUSION: The proposed SMILE index showed good reproducibility; further studies are warranted to correlate our index with clinical and surgical data. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our scoring system allows a standardized evaluation of patients with lateral elbow pain and instability suitable for application into clinical practice, complementing the orthopedic surgeon's clinical diagnosis with imaging findings that may aid treatment choices. KEY POINTS: • Lateral elbow pain is often interpreted clinically as lateral epicondylitis, but it can also encompass intra-articular pathology. • The proposed arthrographic index allows comprehensive quantification of lateral elbow pathology with good reproducibility and application times. • Our index provides the orthopedic surgeon with information regarding intra-articular findings, aiding treatment choices.

Preliminary exploration of deep learning-assisted recognition of superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in shoulder MR arthrography.

PURPOSE: MR arthrography (MRA) is the most accurate method for preoperatively diagnosing superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions, but diagnostic results can vary considerably due to factors such as experience. In this study, deep learning was used to facilitate the preliminary identification of SLAP lesions and compared with radiologists of different seniority. METHODS: MRA data from 636 patients were retrospectively collected, and all patients were classified as having/not having SLAP lesions according to shoulder arthroscopy. The SLAP-Net model was built and tested on 514 patients (dataset 1) and independently tested on data from two other MRI devices (122 patients, dataset 2). Manual diagnosis was performed by three radiologists with different seniority levels and compared with SLAP-Net outputs. Model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUC), etc. McNemar's test was used to compare performance among models and between radiologists' models. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the radiologists' reliability. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: SLAP-Net had AUC = 0.98 and accuracy = 0.96 for classification in dataset 1 and AUC = 0.92 and accuracy = 0.85 in dataset 2. In dataset 1, SLAP-Net had diagnostic performance similar to that of senior radiologists (p = 0.055) but higher than that of early- and mid-career radiologists (p = 0.025 and 0.011). In dataset 2, SLAP-Net had similar diagnostic performance to radiologists of all three seniority levels (p = 0.468, 0.289, and 0.495, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning can be used to identify SLAP lesions upon initial MR arthrography examination. SLAP-Net performs comparably to senior radiologists.

Comparison of conventional MR arthrography and 3D volumetric MR arthrography in detection of cartilage defects accompanying glenoid labrum pathologies.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to compare conventional and T1-weighted volumetric magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in the diagnosis and grading of glenoid cartilage defects that accompany labral pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 patients who were prediagnosed with labrum pathologies based on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had MRA and CTA between December 2021 and May 2022. CTA was regarded as reference standard. CTA images were examined by a radiologist experienced in musculoskeletal radiology, and MRA images were examined by two radiologists independently to determine presence, grade, and localization of any glenoid cartilage defect, if present. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated separately for conventional and T1-weighted volumetric MRA. In addition, at the last stage, two observers examined all MRAs together, and the presence of a cartilage defect was decided by consensus, and the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: Cartilage defect was detected on CTAs of 48 (60.75%) cases of among 79 patients with labrum pathology. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional MRA for two examiners were 17-19%, 100-100%, and 49-51%, respectively, while those values were 67-65%, 92-97%, and 84-77%, respectively, for T1-weighted volumetric MRA. Inter-examiner agreement was excellent for diagnosis of cartilage defects on all MRAs. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of glenoid cartilage lesions by MRA were 69%, 97%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: T1-weighted volumetric MRA seems to demonstrate cartilage defects accompanied with labrum pathologies accurately with high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent inter-examiner agreement.

Direct MR arthrography of the hip joint: anterior approach without imaging guidance.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the anterior injection approach, with anatomical landmark guidance, for direct MR arthrography (dMRA) of the hip joint, and to evaluate the effectiveness in joint distension and the security of the technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of hip dMRAs was conducted on patients with suspected intra-articular pathology from two MR outpatient centers, performed by two radiologists with 25 and 5 years of experience, respectively. The analysis included assessing the presence of intra-articular contrast material (gadolinium-based solution), the number of injections performed, the degree of joint distension, and the degree of contrast extravasation. A multi-variant analysis was carried out to determine if the procedure success depend on any of the demographic variants or on the radiologist experience. Additionally, the presence of immediate and medium-term post-puncture complications was evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred patients with 104 hip dMRA were included; 60 were men, with mean age of 38 years (16-63 years). Contrast material was successfully introduced intra-articularly in 100% of patients, being necessary a second puncture only in 6% of procedures. The capsular distension was considered optimal for diagnosis in 97% of cases. Different degrees of contrast extravasation were found in 30% of dMRA. There was no statistically significant relationship observed between patient variables and the performance of dMRA, nor did it show any correlation with the experience of the radiologists. No puncture-derived complications were found. CONCLUSION: Hip dMRA through anterior injection guided by anatomical references is an effective and safe alternative for patients with suspected intra-articular pathology.

[Adhesive capsulitis]. / Capsulitis adhaesiva.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis (CA; also called Frozen shoulder) is a common, usually unilateral disease of the shoulder joint primarily affecting middle-aged women. Primary, idiopathic, and secondary forms are distinguished. Painful active and passive movement restriction are the clinically leading symptoms. COURSE OF THE DISEASE: The disease usually progresses in three successive stages: freezing phase, frozen phase, and thawing phase. CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS AND IMAGING: CA is primarily diagnosed clinically, with imaging being used to assess or exclude differential diagnoses. Radiography as part of basic diagnostics allows exclusion of common differential diagnoses such as osteoarthritis of the shoulder or calcific tendinitis. Native magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR arthrography (MRA) reveal pathomorphologies typical of CA. Intravenously administered gadolinium increases the sensitivity of MRI. Sonography may be used as a complementary diagnostic modality or as an alternative in case of contraindications to MRI. Fluoroscopy-guided arthrography has been replaced by MRI because of its invasiveness. Computed tomography (CT) has no role in diagnostics due to its radiation exposure and significantly lower sensitivity and specificity compared to MRI. TREATMENT: Therapy of CA is stage-adapted and includes conservative measures such as analgesics and physiotherapy and surgical procedures such as arthroscopic arthrolysis. The therapeutic spectrum is supplemented by new, innovative procedures such as transarterial periarticular embolization. PROGNOSIS: CA is self-limiting and usually persists for 2-3 years. However, the patients may even suffer from pain and limited range of motion beyond this time.

Vibroarthrography-based Knee Lesions Location via Multi-Label Embedding Learning.

Vibration arthrography (VAG) signals are widely utilized for knee pathology recognition due to their non-invasive and radiation-free nature. While most studies focus on determining knee health status, few have examined using VAG signals to locate knee lesions, which would greatly aid physicians in diagnosis and patient monitoring. To address this, we propose using Multi-Label classification (MLC) to efficiently locate different types of lesions within a single input. However, current MLC methods are not suitable for knee lesion location due to two major issues: 1) the positive-negative imbalance of pathological labels in knee pathology recognition is not considered, leading to poor performance, and 2) sparse label correlations between different lesions cannot be effectively extracted. Our solution is a label autoencoder incorporating a pre-trained model (PTM-LAE). To mitigate the positive-negative disequilibrium, we propose a pre-trained feature mapping model utilizing focal loss to dynamically adjust sample weights and focus on difficult-to-classify samples. To better explore the correlations between sparse labels, we introduce a Factorization-Machine-based neural network (DeepFM) that combines higher-order and lower-order correlations between different lesions. Experiments on our collected VAG data demonstrate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography CT Extremity Arthrography in the Preoperative Assessment of Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disease and the leading cause of pain, disability, and quality of life deterioration. Our study sought to evaluate the image quality and dose of cone-beam computed tomography arthrography (CBCT-A) and compare them to digital radiography (DR) for OA diagnoses. Overall, 32 cases of CBCT-A and DR with OA met the inclusion criteria and were prospectively analyzed. The Kellgren and Lawrence classification (KLC) stage, sclerosis, osteophytes, erosions, and mean joint width (MJW) were compared between CBCT-A and DR. Image quality was excellent in all CBCT-A cases, with excellent inter-observer agreement. OA under-classification was noticed with DR for MJW (p = 0.02), osteophyte detection (<0.0001), and KLC (p < 0.0001). The Hounsfield Unit (HU) values obtained for the cone-beam computed tomography CBCT did not correspond to the values for multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), with a greater mean deviation obtained with the MDCT HU for Modeled Based Iterative Reconstruction 1st (MBIR1) than for the 2nd generation (MBIR2). CBCT-A has been found to be more reliable for OA diagnosis than DR as revealed by our results using a three-point rating scale for the qualitative image analysis, with higher quality and an acceptable dose. Moreover, the use of this imaging technique permits the preoperative assessment of extremities in an OA diagnosis, with the upright position and bone microarchitecture analysis being two other advantages of CBCT-A.

Evaluation of a novel MRI-safe needle guidance toolkit for streamlined arthrography procedures.

Currently, Magnetic Resonance arthrography procedures require two rooms and two imaging modalities: fluoroscopically guided needle insertion in a fluoroscopy suite, followed by diagnostic MRI in a separate MRI suite. The use of fluoroscopy for needle placement exposes patients to ionizing radiation, which is an important concern, especially in pediatrics. The need for two different rooms and coordinating times for these rooms complicates hospital resource scheduling and logistics. In addition, the added delays could expose younger children to additional risks associated with the use of general anesthesia. To address these issues, we propose a new technique to streamline the arthrography procedure. Our proposed technology aims to eliminate exposure to ionizing radiation and to streamline arthrography procedures that are conducted solely under MRI. This toolkit consists of a 3D slicer-based user interface, a spatially unique silicone grid template, and a hand-held needle guidance device. Together, these tools are intended to simplify and shorten the procedure while maintaining accuracy and precision comparable to the current gold standard procedure. In our cadaver study, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of our novel MRI-safe Needle Guidance Toolkit for MRI arthrography procedures, achieving an average targeting accuracy of 3.2 ± 1.0 mm. The results presented in this study showed the feasibility and promise of our novel MRI-safe needle guidance toolkit for arthrography procedures.

Frequency of technical success of ultrasound-guided arthrogram injections in children.

BACKGROUND: MR arthrography is an essential diagnostic tool to assess and guide management of labral, ligamentous, fibrocartilaginous, and capsular abnormalities in children. While fluoroscopy is traditionally used for intra-articular contrast administration, ultrasound offers advantages of portability and lack of ionizing radiation exposure for both the patient and proceduralist. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to quantify technical success and frequency of complications of ultrasound-guided arthrogram injections at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigates the results of 217 ultrasound-guided arthrograms of the shoulder, elbow, and hip in patients aged 5-18 years. Successful injection of contrast into the target joint, clinical indication for MR arthrography, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Accurate ultrasound-guided intra-articular administration of contrast into the target joint was successful for 100% of shoulder cases (90/90), 97% of elbow cases (77/79), and 98% of hip cases (47/48). Leak of contrast outside the target joint occurred in 1.4% (3/217) of cases. No major side effects including excessive bleeding, paresthesia, allergic reactions, or infection occurred during or after the procedure. Additionally, no major vessel, nerve, or tendon complications were observed on MR images. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance is a reliable, effective, and safe approach to arthrography in children.

[Subacromial shoulder impingement]. / Subakromiales Schulterimpingement.

Impingement, especially subacromial impingement, is one of the most frequent causes of shoulder pain. It results in soft tissue pathologies due to constriction of the subacromial space. It can lead to tendon pathologies and bursitis. In addition to the clinical examination, imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI arthrography, ultrasound and X­ray examinations are helpful in making a diagnosis or evaluating the cause of pain. Conservative treatment approaches, such as rest, medication, physiotherapy, manual therapy and infiltrations should primarily be used. If the symptoms do not improve after 3-6 months of conservative treatment, surgical treatment should be considered.