Occupational Asthma: The Knowledge Needs for a Better Management.

The management of occupational asthma (OA) may be influenced by several factors and removal from exposure is the main tertiary prevention approach, but it is not always feasible without personal and socioeconomic consequences. Reducing the delay between the onset of suggestive symptoms of OA and the diagnosis of OA is associated with a better prognosis. Workers' education to increase awareness to trigger agents and a medical surveillance program directed especially at at-risk workers could be helpful in reducing this latency time. An early identification of workers who develop rhinitis and conjunctivitis which often precede the onset of asthma symptoms could be important for an early identification of OA. This is particularly important for cases of asthma caused by high-molecular-weight sensitizers and in the early years of employment. The availability of financial support and compensation measures for workers with OA may influence the latency time before diagnosis and, consequently, may influence the OA outcomes. In conclusion, there is a need for high-quality cohort studies that will increase knowledge about risk factor that may influence the timing of diagnosis of OA. This knowledge will be useful for implementation of future surveillance and screening programs in workplaces.

The effectiveness of removal from exposure and reduction of exposure for managing occupational asthma: Summary of an updated Cochrane systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to update the 2011 Cochrane systematic review on the effectiveness of workplace interventions for the treatment of occupational asthma. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with the selection of articles and reports through 2019. The quality of extracted data was evaluated, and meta-analyses were conducted using techniques recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 26 nonrandomized controlled before-and-after studies. The mean number of participants per study was 62 and the mean follow-up time was 4.5 years. Compared with continued exposure, removal from exposure had an increased likelihood of improved symptoms and change in spirometry. Reduction of exposure also had more favorable results for symptom improvement than continued exposure, but no difference for change in spirometry. Comparing exposure removal to reduction revealed an advantage for removal with both symptom improvement and change in spirometry for the larger group of patients exposed to low-molecular-weight agents. Also, the risk of unemployment was greater for exposure removal versus reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure removal and reduction had better outcomes than continued exposure. Removal from exposure was more likely to improve symptoms and spirometry than reduction among patients exposed to low-molecular-weight agents. The potential benefits associated with exposure removal versus reduction need to be weighed against the potential for unemployment that is more likely with removal from exposure. The findings are based on data graded as very low quality, and additional studies are needed to generate higher quality data.

Assessment and Management of Occupational Asthma.

Exposures at work can give rise to different phenotypes of "work-related asthma." The focus of this review is on the diagnosis and management of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma (OA) caused by either a high- or low-molecular-weight agent encountered in the workplace. The diagnosis of OA remains a challenge for the clinician because there is no simple test with a sufficiently high level of accuracy. Instead, the diagnostic process combines different procedures in a stepwise manner. These procedures include a detailed clinical history, immunologic testing, measurement of lung function parameters and airway inflammatory markers, as well as various methods that relate changes in these functional and inflammatory indices to workplace exposure. Their diagnostic performances, alone and in combination, are critically reviewed and summarized into evidence-based key messages. A working diagnostic algorithm is proposed that can be adapted to the suspected agent, purpose of diagnosis, and available resources. Current information on the management options of OA is summarized to provide pragmatic guidance to clinicians who have to advise their patients with OA.

[A questionnaire assessing knowledge level concerning occupational asthma]. / Questionnaire d'évaluation du niveau de connaissances sur l'asthme professionnel.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for occupational asthma is should still be promoted. In order to improve the efficiency of any educational intervention we need to evaluate the patient's knowledge of the disease. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to evaluate objectively the knowledge level of Tunisian asthmatic patients concerning occupational asthma using a self-questionnaire in Arabic Tunisian dialect, then to conduct a validation process of the questionnaire. METHODS: We followed De Vellis's rules during all stages of redaction of the self-questionnaire. It contained 18 items allocated in 4 dimensions: knowledge about asthma; knowledge about occupational asthma; prognosis of occupational asthma; prevention of occupational asthma. A pre-test was conducted on 18 asthmatic patients to assess the clarity and comprehensibility of all the questions. The questionnaire was then applied to 107 asthmatic patients. RESULTS: The statistical analysis proved the discrimination value in 14 of the 18 items. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was demonstrated by a KR20 index of 0.731. Factorial analysis of the principal components showed the reliability of the questionnaire and of its uni-dimensional structure. The statistical findings proved the positive correlation between the mean scores of all its dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Using this questionnaire in daily practice should inform health care providers about the level of knowledge of occupational asthma in the targeted population and improve the effectiveness of any further educational intervention.

[Occupational medical pneumology - what's new?] / Arbeitsmedizinische Pneumologie ­ was gibt es Neues?

In case of obstructive, interstitial and malignant respiratory and lung diseases, occupational causes must always be searched for. The sensitivity and specificity of specific IgE determinations in the diagnosis of occupational asthma are only slightly above 70 %, even for high-molecular allergens. If the patient's medical history is positive, further diagnostics must be carried out, if necessary up to specific exposure testing in specialised institutions. New data show that the serial FeNO determination after working days compared to days off contains additional information that can lead to a positive diagnostic classification. In case of interstitial lung diseases, (avoidable) occupational triggers must be searched for - a new questionnaire provides practical assistance. Patients with lung carcinoma should also be investigated for occupational causes. Here too, questionnaires and tables are available in simple language. In future lung cancer caused by long-term exposure to passive smoke will be considered an occupational disease.

Occupational asthma and rhinitis due to wheat flour: sublingual specific immunotherapy treatment.

BACKGROUND: There are several potential sensitizers in the bakery environment and wheat flour appears to be the dominant sensitizer in most bakeries. Apart from traditional drug therapy or a change in profession, there are no effective therapies for workers who develop serious respiratory symptoms in the workplace. OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical and laboratory findings in workers with asthma and/or rhinitis induced by wheat flour who underwent sublingual specific immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: Since drug therapy and prevention strategies were not effective, five bakers were elected to undergo SLIT. A three-year study was led by administering a sublingual wheat flour extract. Questionnaires, allergy and respiratory tests were performed before and after SLIT. RESULTS: After SLIT an improvement in symptoms is observed in every patient: Asthma Control Test and a quality-of-life questionnaire show higher scores and as a result, workers have reduced the use of drug therapy. We observed significantly reduced exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels after SLIT, hypothesizing that these parameters may be used to monitor the effectiveness of immunotherapy. The improvement of FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1second) and responsiveness to bronchoprovocative tests with methacholine denotes a possible role of SLIT in treating patients with low-respiratory tract involvement, even though more data are needed. DISCUSSIONS: This is the first report in the literature on the use of SLIT for baker's asthma and rhinitis. SLIT for occupational wheat flour allergy should be possible and efficient, saving vocational training, professionalism, and avoiding job loss.

Asthma self-management education in persons with work-related asthma - United States, 2012-2014.

Objective: According to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), self-management education is an integral component of effective asthma care and should be offered to every patient with asthma. To estimate the proportion of persons with work-related asthma (WRA) who received asthma self-management education.Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 2012-2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey data was conducted among ever-employed adults (≥18 years) with current asthma from 31 states and the District of Columbia.Results: Adults with WRA were significantly more likely than those with non-WRA to have ever taken a course to manage their asthma (15.7% versus 6.5%; PR = 2.1), been given an asthma action plan (43.5% versus 26.1%; PR = 1.7), shown how to use an inhaler (97.2% versus 95.8%; PR = 1.0), taught how to recognize early symptoms of an asthma episode (79.4% versus 64.1%; PR = 1.2), taught what to do during an asthma episode (86.4% versus 76.3%; PR = 1.1), taught how to use a peak flow meter to adjust daily medications (57.9% versus 41.7%; PR = 1.3), and advised to change things in home, school, or work (56.9% versus 30.4%; PR = 2.0). Moreover, targets for corresponding Healthy People 2020 respiratory disease objectives were met only among adults with WRA.Conclusions: Although adults with WRA were more likely to have received asthma self-management education, results suggest missed opportunities to provide asthma self-management education. Every healthcare visit should be used as an opportunity to discuss asthma self-management.

Hospital Attendances and Acute Admissions Preceding a Diagnosis of Occupational Asthma.

PURPOSE: Occupational exposures are a common cause of adult-onset asthma; rapid removal from exposure to the causative agent offers the best chance of a good outcome. Despite this, occupational asthma (OA) is widely underdiagnosed. We aimed to see whether chances of diagnosis were missed during acute hospital attendances in the period between symptom onset and the diagnosis of OA. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with OA at the regional occupational lung disease service in Birmingham between 2007 and 2018 whose home address had a Birmingham postcode were included. Emergency department (ED) attendances and acute admission data were retrieved from acute hospitals in the Birmingham conurbation for the period between symptom onset and diagnosis. RESULTS: OA was diagnosed in 406 patients, 147 having a Birmingham postcode. Thirty-four percent (50/147) had acute hospital attendances to a Birmingham conurbation hospital preceding their diagnosis of OA, including 35 (24%) with respiratory illnesses, which resulted in referral for investigation of possible OA in 2/35. The median delay between symptom onset and diagnosis of OA was 30 months (IQR = 13-60) and between first hospital attendance with respiratory illness and diagnosis 12 months (IQR = 12-48, range 3-96 months) CONCLUSIONS: The chance to reduce the delay in the diagnosis of OA was missed in 33/35 patients admitted or seen in ED with respiratory symptoms in the period between symptom onset and diagnosis of OA. The diagnosis of OA was delayed by a median of 12 months by failure to ask about employment and work relationship of symptoms.

Pracenje vrsnog ekspiratornog protoka u dijagnozi profesionalne astme.

Prema podacima iz Registra profesionalnih bolesti Hrvatskoga zavoda za zastitu zdravlja i sigurnost na radu, u posljednjih deset godina (2008. ‒ 2017.) prijavljeno je samo 20 slucajeva profesionalne astme od ukupno 2234 prijavljene profesionalne bolesti. To upucuje na znacajne nedostatke u prepoznavanju toga poremecaja u nasoj radnoj populaciji. Cilj ovoga rada bio je opisati standardnu metodu pracenja vrsnog ekspiratornog protoka zraka (eng. peak expiratory flow, PEF) i predloziti prakticnu smjernicu za koristenje te dijagnosticke metode u ambulantama medicine rada i sporta. Pracenje vrsnog ekspiratornog protoka zraka (PEF-monitoring) jednostavna je, jeftina, neinvazivna i pouzdana metoda za utvrdivanje funkcije disnog sustava u stvarnim uvjetima rada i radnog okolisa. Sadasnje smjernice preporucuju PEF-monitoring kao inicijalnu dijagnosticku metodu prilikom sumnje na profesionalnu astmu. Pozitivan test upozorava na povezanost promjene plucne funkcije s radnom izlozenoscu i vazan je dio dijagnostickoga procesa utvrdivanja profesionalne astme. Najveci je nedostatak te metode da se tim testom ne moze utvrditi uzrok astme, tj. on ne razlikuje profesionalnu astmu od astme pogorsane na radu, nema standardizirane metode za interpretaciju rezultata, a mjerenja provode sami radnici pa su moguce namjerne i nenamjerne manipulacije rezultatima mjerenja. U radu je predlozena prakticna smjernica za primjenu te metode u ambulantama medicine rada i sporta, s preporukama protokola mjerenja PEF-a, prikaza rezultata mjerenja i njihove interpretacije u sklopu dijagnosticiranja profesionalne astme.

Occupational asthma and rhinitis: Do we think about it as soon as possible?

Occupational asthma and allergic diseases of the upper airway play an important role in occupational diseases. The most frequent allergens, which causes occupational respiratory diseases in the Czech Republic, are isocyanates and wheat and rye flour. Isocyanates are the substances used in car industry during production of polyurethanes, they are in colours and glues. Occupational allergic asthma and rhinitis are diagnosed using specific challenge tests with substances from the workplace. These tests can be done in a special exposure box in a lab with substances taken by hygiene specialists from the patient´s workplace or using direct exposure at the workplace. Spirometry and anterior active rhinomanometry are used as objective methods during these tests. For prognosis the early diagnosis and withdrawal from the occupational allergen exposure are essential. Keywords: allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, irritant-induced asthma, irritant-induced rhinitis, isocyanate, occupational disease, specific inhalation challenge.

Occupational lung diseases in Australia.

Occupational exposures are an important determinant of respiratory health. International estimates note that about 15% of adult-onset asthma, 15% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 10-30% of lung cancer may be attributable to hazardous occupational exposures. One-quarter of working asthmatics either have had their asthma caused by work or adversely affected by workplace conditions. Recently, cases of historical occupational lung diseases have been noted to occur with new exposures, such as cases of silicosis in workers fabricating kitchen benchtops from artificial stone products. Identification of an occupational cause of a lung disease can be difficult and requires maintaining a high index of suspicion. When an occupational lung disease is identified, this may facilitate a cure and help to protect coworkers. Currently, very little information is collected regarding actual cases of occupational lung diseases in Australia. Most assumptions about many occupational lung diseases are based on extrapolation from overseas data. This lack of information is a major impediment to development of targeted interventions and timely identification of new hazardous exposures. All employers, governments and health care providers in Australia have a responsibility to ensure that the highest possible standards are in place to protect workers' respiratory health.

An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Presentations and Discussion of the Sixth Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace.

The Sixth Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace focused on six key themes regarding the recognition and assessment of work-related asthma and airway diseases: (1) cleaning agents and disinfectants (including in swimming pools) as irritants and sensitizers: how to evaluate types of bronchial reactions and reduce risks; (2) population-based studies of occupational obstructive diseases: use of databanks, advantages and pitfalls, what strategies to deal with biases and confounding?; (3) damp environments, dilapidated buildings, recycling processes, and molds, an increasing problem: mechanisms, how to assess causality and diagnosis; (4) diagnosis of occupational asthma and rhinitis: how useful are recombinant allergens (component-resolved diagnosis), metabolomics, and other new tests?; (5) how does exposure to gas, dust, and fumes enhance sensitization and asthma?; and (6) how to determine probability of occupational causality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: epidemiological and clinical, confirmation, and compensation aspects. A summary of the presentations and discussion is provided in this proceedings document. Increased knowledge has been gained in each topic over the past few years, but there remain aspects of controversy and uncertainty requiring further research.

Management and prevention of occupational asthma.

Occupational asthma is a potential preventable form of asthma. This review of diagnosis, management and prevention focuses mainly on publications from the past three years. Early suspicion of the diagnosis is essential for a timely diagnosis and management and the possibility may first be raised by the patient or may need to be elicited by careful history by the health care provider. Objective diagnostic steps are needed, as have been detailed in consensus statements and guidelines. A combination of tests is often needed for diagnosis and these are most easily obtained while the patient is still employed. Management includes consideration of safe future workplace accommodation and of preventive measures for the patient and for other workers.

Occupational asthma: diagnostic challenges and management dilemmas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Work-related asthma encompasses both sensitizer-induced and irritant-induced occupational asthma as well as work-exacerbated asthma. This review summarizes current diagnostic and management strategies for occupational asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: Occupational asthma is the most common occupational lung disease in the industrialized world. Over 400 agents have been described to cause occupational asthma. Specific inhalation challenge is often considered the reference method for diagnosis of occupational asthma but specific inhalation challenge as well as other diagnostic tests all generate false positive or false negative results. Definitive avoidance of the inciting agent is the preferred strategy for sensitizer-induced occupational asthma and reduction of exposure is the next best step. Immunotherapy is not currently well established and can cause systemic reactions. SUMMARY: An accurate diagnosis made in a timely fashion can positively impact the health and socioeconomic burden associated with occupational asthma. Newer diagnostic tools are promising, but much work needs to be done to standardize and validate these testing methods. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies are crucial for effective management of sensitizer-induced occupational asthma.

Rinoconjuntivitis y asma ocupacional en una trabajadora de una fábrica de muebles / Rhinoconjunctivitis and occupational asthma in a furniture factory worker

No disponible