RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased in the United Kingdom, and reliably measuring the impact on quality of life and the total healthcare cost from obesity is key to informing the cost-effectiveness of interventions that target obesity, and determining healthcare funding. Current methods for estimating cost-effectiveness of interventions for obesity may be subject to confounding and reverse causation. The aim of this study is to apply a new approach using mendelian randomisation for estimating the cost-effectiveness of interventions that target body mass index (BMI), which may be less affected by confounding and reverse causation than previous approaches. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We estimated health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and both primary and secondary healthcare costs for 310,913 men and women of white British ancestry aged between 39 and 72 years in UK Biobank between recruitment (2006 to 2010) and 31 March 2017. We then estimated the causal effect of differences in BMI on QALYs and total healthcare costs using mendelian randomisation. For this, we used instrumental variable regression with a polygenic risk score (PRS) for BMI, derived using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of BMI, with age, sex, recruitment centre, and 40 genetic principal components as covariables to estimate the effect of a unit increase in BMI on QALYs and total healthcare costs. Finally, we used simulations to estimate the likely effect on BMI of policy relevant interventions for BMI, then used the mendelian randomisation estimates to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. A unit increase in BMI decreased QALYs by 0.65% of a QALY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49% to 0.81%) per year and increased annual total healthcare costs by £42.23 (95% CI: £32.95 to £51.51) per person. When considering only health conditions usually considered in previous cost-effectiveness modelling studies (cancer, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes), we estimated that a unit increase in BMI decreased QALYs by only 0.16% of a QALY (95% CI: 0.10% to 0.22%) per year. We estimated that both laparoscopic bariatric surgery among individuals with BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, and restricting volume promotions for high fat, salt, and sugar products, would increase QALYs and decrease total healthcare costs, with net monetary benefits (at £20,000 per QALY) of £13,936 (95% CI: £8,112 to £20,658) per person over 20 years, and £546 million (95% CI: £435 million to £671 million) in total per year, respectively. The main limitations of this approach are that mendelian randomisation relies on assumptions that cannot be proven, including the absence of directional pleiotropy, and that genotypes are independent of confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Mendelian randomisation can be used to estimate the impact of interventions on quality of life and healthcare costs. We observed that the effect of increasing BMI on health-related quality of life is much larger when accounting for 240 chronic health conditions, compared with only a limited selection. This means that previous cost-effectiveness studies have likely underestimated the effect of BMI on quality of life and, therefore, the potential cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce BMI.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Obesidad/prevención & control , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Health Mission (NHM), the largest ever publicly funded health programme worldwide, used over half of the national health budget in India and primarily aimed to improve maternal and child health in the country. Though large scale public health investment has improved the health care utilization and health outcomes across states and socio-economic groups in India, little is known on the equity concern of NHM. In this context, this paper examines the utilization pattern and net benefit of public subsidy for institutional delivery by the level of care in India. METHODS: Data from the most recent round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 4), conducted during 2015-16, was used in the study. A total of 148,645 last birth delivered in a health centre during the 5 years preceding the survey were used for the analyses. Out-of-pocket (OOP) payment on delivery care was taken as the dependent variable and was analysed by primary care and secondary level of care. Benefits Incidence Analysis (BIA), descriptive statistics, concentration index (CI), and concentration curve (CC) were used to do the analysis. RESULTS: Institutional delivery from the public health centres in India is pro-poor and has a strong economic gradient. However, about 28% mothers from richest wealth quintile did not pay for delivery in public health centres compared to 16% among the poorest wealth quintile. Benefit incidence analyses suggests a pro-poor distribution of institutional delivery both at primary and secondary level of care. In 2015-16, at the primary level, about 32.29% of subsidies were used by the poorest, 27.22% by poorer, 20.39% by middle, 13.36% by richer and 6.73% by the richest wealth quintile. The pattern at the secondary level was similar, though the magnitude was lower. The concentration index of institutional delivery in public health centres was - 0.161 [95% CI, - 0.158, - 0.165] compared to 0.296 [95% CI, 0.289, 0.303] from private health centres. CONCLUSION: Provision and use of public subsidy for institutional delivery in public health centres is pro-poor in India. Improving the quality of service in primary health centres is recommended to increase utilisation and reduce OOP payment for health care in India.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Asistencia Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/economía , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Equidad en Salud , Humanos , India , Embarazo , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Aim To compare the relative efficiencies of skin excisions in primary and secondary care. Methods We compared the benign: malignant ratio for specimens referred by General Practice, General Surgery and the Skin Cancer Service to the regional pathology laboratory over one month. We used cost minimization analysis to compare the relative efficiencies of the services. Results 620 excisions were received: 139 from General Practice, 118 from General Surgery and 363 from the Skin Cancer Service. The number (%) of malignant lesions was 13 (9.4%) from General Practice, 18 (15.2%) from General Surgery and 137 (37.7%) from the Skin Cancer Service. Excision was cheaper in General Practice at 84.58 as compared to 97.49 in the hospital day surgical unit. However, the cost per malignant lesion excised was 1779.80 in general practice versus 381.78 in the Skin Cancer Service. Conclusion Our results indicate that moving skin cancer treatment to General Practice may result in an excess of benign excisions and therefore be both less efficient and less cost effective.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/métodos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/economía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Especialización/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Medicina General/economía , Cirugía General/economía , Humanos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that influenza is associated with a substantial healthcare burden in the United Kingdom (UK), but more studies are needed to evaluate the resource use and direct medical costs of influenza in primary care and secondary care. METHODS: A retrospective observational database study in the UK to describe the primary care and directly-associated secondary care resource use, and direct medical costs of acute respiratory illness (ARI), according to age, and risk status (NCT Number: 01521416). Patients with influenza, ARI or influenza-related respiratory infections during 9 consecutive pre-pandemic influenza peak seasons were identified by READ codes in the linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) dataset. The study period was from 21st January 2001 to 31st March 2009. RESULTS: A total of 156,193 patients had ≥1 general practitioner (GP) episode of ARI, and a total of 82,204 patients received ≥1 GP prescription, at a mean of 2.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 3.0) prescriptions per patient. The total cost of GP consultations and prescriptions equated to £462,827 per year per 100,000 patients. The yearly cost of prescribed medication for ARI was £319,732, at an estimated cost of £11,596,350 per year extrapolated to the UK, with 40% attributable to antibiotics. The mean cost of hospital admissions equated to a yearly cost of £981,808 per 100,000 patients. The total mean direct medical cost of ARI over 9 influenza seasons was £21,343,445 (SD: £10,441,364), at £136.65 (SD: £66.85) per case. CONCLUSIONS: Extrapolating to the UK population, for pre-pandemic influenza seasons from 2001 to 2009, the direct medical cost of ARI equated to £86 million each year. More studies are needed to assess the costs of influenza disease to help guide public health decision-making for seasonal influenza in the UK.
Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In its 2006 report, From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition, the U.S. Institute of Medicine raised the need for a more coordinated and comprehensive care model for cancer survivors. Given the ever increasing number of cancer survivors, in general, and prostate cancer survivors, in particular, there is a need for a more sustainable model of follow-up care. Currently, patients who have completed primary treatment for localized prostate cancer are often included in a specialist-based follow-up care program. General practitioners already play a key role in providing continuous and comprehensive health care. Studies in breast and colorectal cancer suggest that general practitioners could also consider to provide survivorship care in prostate cancer. However, empirical data are needed to determine whether follow-up care of localized prostate cancer survivors by the general practitioner is a feasible alternative. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority study will compare specialist-based (usual care) versus general practitioner-based (intervention) follow-up care of prostate cancer survivors who have completed primary treatment (prostatectomy or radiotherapy) for localized prostate cancer. Patients are being recruited from hospitals in the Netherlands, and randomly (1:1) allocated to specialist-based (N = 195) or general practitioner-based (N = 195) follow-up care. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of primary care-based follow-up, in comparison to usual care, in terms of adherence to the prostate cancer surveillance guideline for the timing and frequency of prostate-specific antigen assessments, the time from a biochemical recurrence to retreatment decision-making, the management of treatment-related side effects, health-related quality of life, prostate cancer-related anxiety, continuity of care, and cost-effectiveness. The outcome measures will be assessed at randomization (≤6 months after treatment), and 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. DISCUSSION: This multicenter, prospective, randomized study will provide empirical evidence regarding the (cost-) effectiveness of specialist-based follow-up care compared to general practitioner-based follow-up care for localized prostate cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, Trial NL7068 (NTR7266). Prospectively registered on 11 June 2018.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Médicos Generales/organización & administración , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Cuidados Posteriores/economía , Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ansiedad/psicología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Médicos Generales/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/organización & administración , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Rol Profesional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Secundaria de Salud/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients. METHODS: A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform. RESULTS: In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Adulto , Presupuestos , China , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitales , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We studied the association between deprivation and healthcare costs after hip fracture. Hospital costs in the year following hip fracture were £1120 higher for those living in more deprived areas. Most of this difference was explained by pre-existing health inequalities which should be targeted to reduce this disparity. INTRODUCTION: To quantify differences in hospital costs following hip fracture between those living in higher and lower deprivation areas of England, we investigate pre- and post-fracture variables that explain the association. METHODS: We used English Hospital Episodes Statistics linked to the National Hip Fracture Database (April 2011-March 2015) and national mortality data to identify patients admitted with hip fracture aged 60+ years. Hospital care was costed using 2017/2018 national reference costs, by index of multiple deprivation quintile. Three generalised linear model regressions estimated associations between deprivation and costs and the pre- and post-fracture variables that mediate this relationship. RESULTS: Patients from the most deprived areas had higher hospital costs in the year post-fracture (£1,120; 95% CI £993 to £1,247) than those from the least deprived areas. If all patients could have incurred similar costs to those in the least deprived quintile, this would equate to an annual reduction in expenditure of £28.8 million. Pre-fracture characteristics, particularly comorbidities and anaesthetic risk grade, accounted for approximately 50% of the association between deprivation and costs. No evidence was found that post-fracture variables, such as transfer to a residential or nursing home, contributed to the association between deprivation and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with substantial costs for the NHS after hip fracture. We did not identify post-fracture targets for intervention to reduce the impact of inequalities on post-fracture costs. The case for interventions to reduce comorbid conditions, improve health-related behaviours and prevent falls in deprived areas is clear but challenging to implement.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Fracturas de Cadera , Atención Secundaria de Salud , Comorbilidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/economía , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Clase SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales was developed and analysed. The model was informed by the literature, routinely collected data and a clinical study conducted in parallel with the modelling. SETTING: Secondary care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Simulations based on characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetes <30 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Four test-treatment strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes in a prevalent cohort of diabetics diagnosed under the age of 30 years were modelled: clinician-based genetic test referral, targeted genetic testing based on clinical prediction models, targeted genetic testing based on biomarkers, and blanket genetic testing. The results of the test-treatment strategies were compared with a strategy of no genetic testing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted lifetime costs, proportion of cases of monogenic diabetes identified. RESULTS: Based on current evidence, strategies using clinical characteristics or biomarkers were estimated to save approximately £100-£200 per person with diabetes over a lifetime compared with no testing. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prevalence of monogenic diabetes, the uptake of testing, and the frequency of home blood glucose monitoring had the largest impact on the results (ranging from savings of £400-£50 per person), but did not change the overall findings. The model is limited by many model inputs being based on very few individuals, and some long-term data informed by clinical opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to the NHS could be saved with targeted genetic testing based on clinical characteristics or biomarkers. More research should focus on the economic case for the use of such strategies closer to the time of diabetes diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01238380.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Adulto , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/genética , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Humanos , Medicina Estatal , Gales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: People in prison tend to experience poorer health, access to healthcare services and health outcomes than the general population. Use of video consultations (telemedicine) has been proven effective at improving the access, cost and quality of secondary care for prisoners in the USA and Australia. Implementation and use in English prison settings has been limited to date despite political drivers for change. We plan to research the implementation of a new prison-hospital telemedicine model in an English county to understand what factors drive or hinder implementation and whether the model can improve healthcare outcomes as demonstrated in other contextual settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake a hybrid type 2 implementation effectiveness study to gather evidence on both clinical and implementation outcomes. Data collection will be guided by the theoretical constructs of Normalisation Process Theory. We will prospectively collect data through: (1) prisoner/patient focus groups, interviews and questionnaires, (2) prison healthcare, hospital and wider prison staff interviews and questionnaires, (3) routine quality improvement and service evaluation data. Up to four prisons and three hospital settings in Surrey (England) will be included in the telemedicine research, dependent on their telemedicine readiness during the study period. Prisons proposed include male and female prisoners, remand (not yet sentenced) and sentenced individuals and different security categorisations. In addition, focus groups in five telemedicine naïve prisons will provide information on patient preconceptions and concerns surrounding telemedicine. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received National Health Service Research Ethics Committee, Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service National Research Committee and Health Research Authority approval. Dissemination of results will take place through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and existing health and justice networks.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Prisioneros , Atención Secundaria de Salud , Telemedicina , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Inglaterra , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Prisiones , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Medicina Estatal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of the Great Recession (2008) on primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) inequalities in Spain. METHOD: Repeated cross-sectional study using Spanish Health Surveys from 2001 to 2017 (n=139,566). Prevalence of PC and SC utilization were calculated standardized by age. Chi square tests for trend were conducted to explore the evolution. We performed logistic regression analyses adjusted by the Andersen's model of demand for care to explore inequalities prior to, during and following the recession. All the analyses were stratified by sex. RESULTS: Healthcare use trends changed from a rapid increase in the pre-recession period to a plateau during the recession and a decrease in the post-recession period. Healthcare use was higher in women (PC: 15.8% to 32.5%; SC: 8.2% to 16.2%) than in men (PC: 11.3% to 24.1%; SC: 5.4% to 11.6%) and the gender gap increased. During the recession the likelihood of PC use was higher in disadvantaged groups, while SC had greater usage amongst more advantaged social groups. Inequalities in SC use increased during the recession and could not be attributed to factors of need. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare use trends changed as a result of the recession. There are socioeconomic inequalities in the use of PC and SC in Spain, which increased in secondary care, during the recession and in the post-recession period. It is necessary to take into account socioeconomic determinants in health planning, in order to achieve equity in healthcare services.
Asunto(s)
Recesión Económica , Servicios de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Escolaridad , Empleo/economía , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Público/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Clase Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , España , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the 24-month cost-effectiveness of total knee replacement (TKR) plus non-surgical treatment compared with non-surgical treatment with the option of later TKR if needed. METHODS: 100 adults with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis found eligible for TKR by an orthopaedic surgeon in secondary care were randomised to TKR plus 12 weeks of supervised non-surgical treatment (exercise, education, diet, insoles and pain medication) or to supervised non-surgical treatment alone. Including quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) data from baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, effectiveness was measured as change at 24 months. Healthcare costs and transfer payments were derived from national registries. Incremental healthcare costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted and the probability of cost-effectiveness was estimated at the 22 665 Euros/QALY threshold defined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. RESULTS: TKR plus non-surgical treatment was more expensive (mean of 23 076 vs 14 514 Euros) but also more effective than non-surgical treatment (mean 24-month improvement in QALY of 0.195 vs 0.056). While cost-effective in the unadjusted scenario (ICER of 18 497 Euros/QALY), TKR plus non-surgical treatment was not cost-effective compared with non-surgical treatment with the option of later TKR if needed in the adjusted (age, sex and baseline values), base-case scenario (ICER of 32 611 Euros/QALY) with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 23.2%. Including deaths, TKR plus non-surgical treatment was still not cost-effective (ICERs of 46 277 to 64 208 Euros/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: From a 24-month perspective, TKR plus non-surgical treatment does not appear to be cost-effective compared with non-surgical treatment with the option of later TKR if needed in patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis and moderate intensity pain in secondary care in Denmark. Results were sensitive to changes, highlighting the need for further confirmatory research also assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of TKR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01410409).
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Tratamiento Conservador/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dinamarca , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/economía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Persistent physical symptoms (PPS), also known as medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), affect approximately 50% of patients in secondary care and are often associated with disability, psychological distress and increased health care costs. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has demonstrated both short- and long-term efficacy with small to medium effect sizes for PPS, with larger treatment effects for specific PPS syndromes, including non-cardiac chest pain, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Research indicates that PPS conditions share similar cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms, such as avoidance and unhelpful beliefs. This suggests that a transdiagnostic approach may be beneficial for patients with PPS. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a transdiagnostic CBT-based intervention for PPS. 322 participants with PPS will be recruited from secondary care clinics. Participants stratified by clinic and disability level will be randomised to CBT plus standard medical care (SMC) versus SMC alone. The intervention consists of 8 CBT sessions delivered by a qualified therapist over a period of 20 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at 9, 20, 40- and 52-weeks post randomisation. Efficacy will be assessed by examining the difference between arms in the primary outcome Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 52 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include mood, symptom severity and clinical global impression at 9, 20, 40 and 52 weeks. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated by combining measures of health service use, informal care, loss of working hours and financial benefits at 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide a powered evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a transdiagnostic CBT approach versus SMC for patients with PPS. It will also provide valuable information about potential healthcare pathways for patients with PPS within the National Health Service (NHS). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426788. Registered 27 April 2015. Overall trial status: Ongoing; Recruitment status: No longer recruiting.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/métodos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Trastornos Somatomorfos/economía , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Medicina Estatal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the personal and societal impact of low back pain (LBP) in patients admitted to a multidisciplinary spine center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The socioeconomic burden of LBP is very high. A minority of patients visit secondary or tertiary care because of severe and long-lasting complaints. This subgroup may account for a major part of disability and costs, yet could potentially gain most from treatment. Currently, little is known about the personal and societal burden in patients with chronic complex LBP visiting secondary/tertiary care. METHODS: Baseline data were acquired through patient-reported questionnaires and health insurance claims. Primary outcomes were LBP impact (Impact Stratification, range 8-50), functioning (Pain Disability Index, PDI; 0-70), quality of life (EuroQol-5D, EQ5D; -0.33 to 1.00), work ability (Work Ability Score, WAS; 0-10), work participation, productivity costs (Productivity Cost Questionnaire), and healthcare costs 1 year before baseline. Healthcare costs were compared with matched primary and secondary care LBP samples. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. RESULTS: In total, 1502 patients (age 46.3â±â12.8 years, 57% female) were included. Impact Stratification was 35.2â±â7.5 with severe impact (≥35) for 58% of patients. PDI was 38.2â±â14.1, EQ5D 0.39 (interquartile range, IQR: 0.17-0.72); WAS 4.0 (IQR: 1.0-6.0) and 17% were permanently work-disabled. Mean total health care costs (&OV0556;4875, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4309-5498) were higher compared to the matched primary care sample (nâ=â4995) (&OV0556;2365, 95% CI: 2219-2526, Pâ<â0.001), and similar to the matched secondary care sample (nâ=â4993) (&OV0556;4379, 95% CI: 4180-4590). Productivity loss was estimated at &OV0556;4315 per patient (95% CI: 3898-4688) during 6 months. CONCLUSION: In patients seeking multidisciplinary spine care, the personal and societal impact of LBP is very high. Specifically, quality of life and work ability are poor and health care costs are twice as high compared to patients seeking primary LBP care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Calidad de Vida , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Eficiencia , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Capacidad de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concerns have repeatedly been expressed about the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis receive. AIMS: To examine whether the introduction of a financial incentive for secondary care services led to improvements in the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis. METHOD: Longitudinal data were collected over an 8-year period on the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis received from 56 trusts in England before and after the introduction of the financial incentive. Control data were also collected from six health boards in Wales where a financial incentive was not introduced. We calculated the proportion of patients whose clinical records indicated that they had been screened for seven key aspects of physical health and whether they were offered interventions for problems identified during screening. RESULTS: Data from 17 947 people collected prior to (2011 and 2013) and following (2017) the introduction of the financial incentive in 2014 showed that the proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in England rose from 12.85% to 31.65% (difference 18.80, 95% CI 17.37-20.21). The proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in Wales during this period rose from 8.40% to 13.96% (difference 5.56, 95% CI 1.33-10.10). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that financial incentives for secondary care mental health services are associated with marked improvements in the quality of care that patients receive. Further research is needed to examine their impact on aspects of care that are not incentivised.
Asunto(s)
Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos/economía , Planes de Incentivos para los Médicos/organización & administración , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/normas , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Inglaterra , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , GalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rising healthcare costs due to unnecessary referrals to secondary healthcare services underscore the need for optimizing current referral procedures. This study investigates whether the use of web-based consultation (WBC) in general practice is a feasible alternative to decrease referrals. METHODS: Patients with lumbosacral radicular syndrome, knee complaints, or thyroid dysfunction, who visited the general practitioner (GP) between May 2015 and December 2016 were included for a WBC. We determined whether the GP would refer a patient to an outpatient clinic in the absence of a WBC and then compared this decision with the referral advice from a specialist. We further assessed the user-friendliness of the WBC service based on average recorded user time and feedback from the GPs. RESULTS: Seventy eligible WBCs submitted by GPs were analyzed. Our data showed a 46% absolute reduction in in-persons referrals in our study population. These findings confirmed the feasibility of using WBC. The median time spent to submit a WBC was five and 10 min for GPs and specialists respectively. On average, the WBC service saved 286 per WBC. The results of a questionnaire showed that GPs found WBC to be a user-friendly option which could help reduce the number of in-person referrals. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that WBC is not only feasible but has the potential to reduce nearly half of all in-person referrals to outpatient clinics. WBC decreased healthcare expenses and proved to be a user-friendly and safe alternative to the standard referral process. WBC may potentially have a profound impact on healthcare expenditure if applied in a wider medical setting. For follow-up research, we recommend including a control group for comparative analyses.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Internet , Derivación y Consulta , Consulta Remota , Especialización , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertiroidismo , Hipotiroidismo , Artropatías , Articulación de la Rodilla , Región Lumbosacra , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Radiculopatía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We determined the prevalence of untreated depression in patients with hypertension (HT) and/or diabetes (DM) and estimated the extra health care use and expenditures associated with this comorbidity in a rural Hungarian adult population. We also assessed the potential workload of systematic screening for depression in this patient group. METHODS: General health check database from a primary care programme containing survey data of 2027 patients with HT and/or DM was linked to the outpatient secondary care use database of National Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management. Depression was ascertained by Beck Depression Inventory score and antidepressant drug use. The association between untreated depression and secondary healthcare utilization indicated by number of visits and expenses was evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis controlled for socioeconomic/lifestyle factors and comorbidity. The age-, sex- and education-specific observations were used to estimate the screening workload for an average general medical practice. RESULTS: The frequency of untreated depression was 27.08%. The untreated severe depression (7.45%) was associated with increased number of visits (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11-2.31) and related expenses (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.50-3.22) in a socioeconomic status-independent manner. To identify untreated depression cases among patients with HT and/or DM, an average GP has to screen 42 subjects a month. CONCLUSION: It seems to be reasonable and feasible to screen for depression in patients with HT and/or DM in the primary care, in order to detect cases without treatment (which may be associated with increase of secondary care visits and expenditures) and to initiate the adequate treatment of them.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Hipertensión/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Depresión/economía , Depresión/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Hungría , Hipertensión/economía , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between patient self-management capability measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and healthcare utilisation across a whole health economy. RESULTS: 12 270 PAM questionnaires were returned from 9348 patients. In the adjusted analyses, compared with the least activated group, highly activated patients (level 4) had the lowest rate of contact with a general practitioner (rate ratio: 0.82, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.86), emergency department attendances (rate ratio: 0.68, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.78), emergency hospital admissions (rate ratio: 0.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75) and outpatient attendances (rate ratio: 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.88). These patients also had the lowest relative rate (compared with the least activated) of 'did not attends' at the general practitioner (rate ratio: 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87), 'did not attends' at hospital outpatient appointments (rate ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.86) and self-referred attendance at emergency departments for conditions classified as minor severity (rate ratio: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82), a significantly shorter average length of stay for overnight elective admissions (rate ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94),and a lower likelihood of 30- day emergency readmission (rate ratio: 0.68 , 95% CI 0.39 to 1.17), though this did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management capability is associated with lower healthcare utilisation and less wasteful use across primary and secondary care.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/métodos , Adulto , Ahorro de Costo , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To appraise and synthesise research on the impact of physician assistants/associates (PA) in secondary care, specifically acute internal medicine, care of the elderly, emergency medicine, trauma and orthopaedics, and mental health. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, ASSIA, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice, EconLit and Cochrane), reference lists and related articles. INCLUDED ARTICLES: Peer-reviewed articles of any study design, published in English, 1995-2017. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded parallel processes were used to screen abstracts and full text, data extractions and quality assessments against published guidelines. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact on: patients' experiences and outcomes, service organisation, working practices, other professional groups and costs. RESULTS: 5472 references were identified and 161 read in full; 16 were included-emergency medicine (7), trauma and orthopaedics (6), acute internal medicine (2), mental health (1) and care of the elderly (0). All studies were observational, with variable methodological quality. In emergency medicine and in trauma and orthopaedics, when PAs are added to teams, reduced waiting and process times, lower charges, equivalent readmission rate and good acceptability to staff and patients are reported. Analgesia prescribing, operative complications and mortality outcomes were variable. In internal medicine outcomes of care provided by PAs and doctors were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: PAs have been deployed to increase the capacity of a team, enabling gains in waiting time, throughput, continuity and medical cover. When PAs were compared with medical staff, reassuringly there was little or no negative effect on health outcomes or cost. The difficulty of attributing cause and effect in complex systems where work is organised in teams is highlighted. Further rigorous evaluation is required to address the complexity of the PA role, reporting on more than one setting, and including comparison between PAs and roles for which they are substituting. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016032895.
Asunto(s)
Asistentes Médicos/provisión & distribución , Atención Secundaria de Salud/economía , Atención Secundaria de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Asistentes Médicos/economía , Asistentes Médicos/organización & administración , Tolerancia al Trabajo ProgramadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems around the world have been responding to the demand for better integrated models of service delivery. However, there is a need for further clarity regarding the effects of these new models of integration, and exploration regarding whether models introduced in other care systems may achieve similar outcomes in a UK national health service context. METHODS: The study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the effects of integration or co-ordination between healthcare services, or between health and social care on service delivery outcomes including effectiveness, efficiency and quality of care. Electronic databases including MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Science and Social Science Citation Indices; and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature published between 2006 to March 2017. Online sources were searched for UK grey literature, and citation searching, and manual reference list screening were also carried out. Quantitative primary studies and systematic reviews, reporting actual or perceived effects on service delivery following the introduction of models of integration or co-ordination, in healthcare or health and social care settings in developed countries were eligible for inclusion. Strength of evidence for each outcome reported was analysed and synthesised using a four point comparative rating system of stronger, weaker, inconsistent or limited evidence. RESULTS: One hundred sixty seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Analysis indicated evidence of perceived improved quality of care, evidence of increased patient satisfaction, and evidence of improved access to care. Evidence was rated as either inconsistent or limited regarding all other outcomes reported, including system-wide impacts on primary care, secondary care, and health care costs. There were limited differences between outcomes reported by UK and international studies, and overall the literature had a limited consideration of effects on service users. CONCLUSIONS: Models of integrated care may enhance patient satisfaction, increase perceived quality of care, and enable access to services, although the evidence for other outcomes including service costs remains unclear. Indications of improved access may have important implications for services struggling to cope with increasing demand. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration number: 42016037725 .