Potential role for ET-2 acting through ETA receptors in experimental colitis in mice.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: This study attempted to clarify the roles of endothelins and mechanisms associated with ETA/ETB receptors in mouse models of colitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Colitis was induced by intracolonic administration of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS, 1.5 mg/animal) or dextran sulfate sodium (DSS, 3%). After colitis establishment, mice received Atrasentan (ETA receptor antagonist, 10 mg/kg), A-192621 (ETB receptor antagonist, 20 mg/kg) or Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) and several inflammatory parameters were assessed, as well as mRNA levels for ET-1, ET-2 and ET receptors. RESULTS: Atrasentan treatment ameliorates TNBS- and DSS-induced colitis. In the TNBS model was observed reduction in macroscopic and microscopic score, colon weight, neutrophil influx, IL-1ß, MIP-2 and keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC) levels, inhibition of adhesion molecules expression and restoration of IL-10 levels. However, A192621 treatment did not modify any parameter. ET-1 and ET-2 mRNA was decreased 24 h, but ET-2 mRNA was markedly increased at 48 h after TNBS. ET-2 was able to potentiate LPS-induced KC production in vitro. ETA and ETB receptors mRNA were increased at 24, 48 and 72 h after colitis induction. CONCLUSIONS: Atrasentan treatment was effective in reducing the severity of colitis in DSS- and TNBS-treated mice, suggesting that ETA receptors might be a potential target for inflammatory bowel diseases.

Metastasis suppressors: basic and translational advances.

Tumor metastasis is a main contributor to death in cancer patients. In the last years, a new class of molecules that reduces the metastatic propensity has been identified: metastasis suppressors. These proteins regulate multiple steps in the metastatic cascade, including cell invasion, survival in the vascular and lymphatic circulation, and colonization of distant organ sites. As a consequence, they are very important therapeutic targets. This review discusses our current understanding of metastasis suppressors and how this knowledge might be useful to improve the treatment of cancer patients.

Endothelins implicated in referred mechanical hyperalgesia associated with colitis induced by TNBS in mice.

This study evaluated the contribution of endothelins to changes in sensitivity to mechanical stimulation of the lower abdomen and hind paw associated with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis. The frequency of withdrawal responses to 10 consecutive applications of von Frey probes to the lower abdomen (0.07 g) or hind paw (0.4 g) was assessed in male BALB/c mice before and after intracolonic TNBS injection (0.5 mg in 100 microL of 35% ethanol). TNBS (0.5 mg) induced referred mechanical hyperalgesia in the abdomen (response frequencies at 24 h: saline 11.0% +/- 3.1%, TNBS 48.0% +/- 6.9%) and hind paw (frequencies at 24 h: saline 12.5% +/- 4.7%, TNBS 47.1% +/- 7.1%) lasting up to 72 and 48 h, respectively. Mice receiving 1.0 or 1.5 mg TNBS assumed hunch-backed postures and became immobile during abdominal mechanical stimulation, suggestive of excessive ongoing pain. Atrasentan (ETA receptor antagonist; 10 and 30 mg/kg, i.v.) given 24 h after TNBS abolished hind paw and abdominal mechanical hyperalgesia for 2-3 h. A-192621 (ETB receptor antagonist; 20 mg/kg, i.v.) attenuated abdominal mechanical hyperalgesia at the 3 h time point only. Thus, endothelins contribute importantly to abdominal and hind paw referred mechanical hyperalgesia during TNBS-induced colitis mainly through ETA receptor-signaled mechanisms.

Mechanisms operated by endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in the trigeminal ganglion contribute to orofacial thermal hyperalgesia induced by infraorbital nerve constriction in rats.

Endothelins, acting through specific endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors, participate in nociceptive processing in models of cancer, inflammatory and neuropathic pain. The present study investigated which cell types express endothelin receptors in the trigeminal ganglion, and the contribution of mechanisms mediated by endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors to orofacial heat hyperalgesia induced by unilateral constriction of the infraorbital nerve (CION). Both receptor types were identified by immunohistochemistry in the trigeminal ganglion, ET(A) receptors on small-sized non-myelinated and myelinated A-fibers and ET(B) receptors on both satellite glial cells and small-sized non-myelinated neuronal cells. CION promoted ipsilateral orofacial heat hyperalgesia which lasted from Day 2 until Day 10 after surgery. Ongoing CION-induced heat hyperalgesia (on Day 4) was reduced transiently, but significantly, by systemic or local treatment with antagonists of endothelin ET(A) receptors (atrasentan, 10 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-123, 10 nmol/lip), endothelin ET(B) receptors (A-192621, 20 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-788, 10 nmol/ lip), or of both ET(A)/ET(B) receptors (bosentan, 10 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-123 plus BQ-788, each at 10 nmol/lip). On the other hand, CION-induced heat hyperalgesia was transiently abolished over the first 90 min following i.p. injection of morphine hydrochloride (2.5 mg/kg), but fully resistant to reversal by indomethacin (4 mg/kg, i.p.) or celecoxib (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Thus, heat hyperalgesia induced by CION is maintained, in part, by peripheral signaling mechanisms operated by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Endothelin receptors might represent promising therapeutic targets for the control of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

Endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist reduces mechanical allodynia in rats with trigeminal neuropathic pain.

Trigeminal neuropathic pain, which is associated with marked orofacial mechanical allodynia, is frequently refractory to currently available drugs. Because endothelins (ETs) can contribute to nociceptive changes in animal models of inflammatory, cancer, and diabetic neuropathic pain, the present study evaluated the influence of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonists on orofacial mechanical allodynia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain. Unilateral constriction (C) of the infraorbital nerve (ION) caused pronounced and sustained bilateral mechanical allodynia, evaluated by application of von Frey hairs to the vibrissal pad. Mechanical allodynia on postoperative days 12-15 after nerve injury was abolished for up to 90 mins by subcutaneous administration of 2.5 mg/kg morphine, but was fully refractory to intravenous (iv) administration of 10 mg/kg of the dual ET(A) plus ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, bosentan and atrasentan, respectively. In sharp contrast, iv administration of 20 mg/kg of the selective ET(B) receptor antagonist, A-192621, caused a net 61 +/- 15% reduction of mechanical threshold, lasting 2 hrs. Co-injection of atrasentan plus A-192621 did not modify ION injury-induced mechanical allodynia. Injection of 10 pmol ET-1 into the upper lip of naive rats caused ipsilateral mechanical allodynia lasting up to 5 hrs. Thus, ET(B) receptor-mediated mechanisms contribute to orofacial mechanical allodynia induced by CION injury, but, some-how, functional ET(A) receptors are required for expression of the antiallodynic effect of ET(B) receptor blockade.

Orofacial cold hyperalgesia due to infraorbital nerve constriction injury in rats: reversal by endothelin receptor antagonists but not non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The susceptibility of changes in responsiveness to noxious cold stimulation of rats submitted to chronic constriction of the infraorbital nerve (CION) or carrageenan to drug inhibition was compared. Nocifensive responses were measured as total time rats engaged in bilateral facial grooming with both forepaws over the first 2 min following tetrafluoroethane spray application to the snout. Carrageenan (50 microg, s.c. into upper lip) caused short-lived ipsilateral cold hyperalgesia (peak at 3 h: vehicle 8.4+/-1.3, carrageenan 21.2+/-3.0 s) which was markedly suppressed by i.p. indomethacin (4 mg/kg), celecoxib (10mg/kg) or s.c. dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg), endothelin ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists (BQ-123 and BQ-788, respectively; 10 nmol/lip). CION caused ipsilateral cold hyperalgesia between Days 2 and 12, which peaked on Days 4 (sham 15.3+/-1.8, CION 32.4+/-5.3s) to 6. Established peak CION-induced cold hyperalgesia was unaffected by indomethacin and celecoxib, whereas dexamethasone, BQ-123, BQ-788, and i.v. injections of selective antagonists of ET(A) (atrasentan, 3-10 mg/kg) or ET(B) (A-192621, 5-20 mg/kg) receptors caused significant inhibitions lasting 1-2.5h (peaks approximately 65-90%). Bosentan (dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, 10 mg/kg, i.v.) abolished CION-induced cold hyperalgesia for up to 6h. Thus, once established, CION-induced orofacial hyperalgesia to cold stimuli appears to lack an inflammatory component, but is alleviated by endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptor antagonists. If this CION injury model bears predictive value to trigeminal neuralgia (i.e., paroxysmal orofacial pain triggered by various stimuli), endothelin receptors might constitute new targets for treatment of this disorder.

Effects of endothelin ETA receptor antagonism on granulocyte and lymphocyte accumulation in LPS-induced inflammation.

Endothelin peptides play active roles in different aspects of inflammation. This study investigates the contribution of endogenous endothelins to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pulmonary inflammation by assessing the influence of ET(A) receptor antagonism on leukocyte accumulation, granulocyte adhesion molecule expression, and chemokine/cytokine modulation. Local pretreatment with BQ-123 or A-127722 (150 pmol), two selective and chemically unrelated endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists, inhibits neutrophil and eosinophil accumulation in LPS-induced pleurisy at 24 h but not neutrophil migration at 4 h. The effect of endothelin antagonism on neutrophil accumulation at 24 h was concomitant with inhibition of eosinophil and CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte influx. It is surprising that the ET(A) receptor blockade did not inhibit the accumulation of gammadelta T lymphocytes, cells that are important for granulocyte recruitment in this model. Blockade of ET(A) receptors did not influence the expression of adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD49d) on granulocytes but abrogated the increase in tumor necrosis factor alpha levels 4 h after LPS stimulation and also markedly inhibited increases in levels of interleukin-6 and keratinocyte-derived chemokine/CXC chemokine ligand 1 but not eotaxin/chemokine ligand 11. Thus, acting via ET(A) receptors, endogenous endothelins play an important role in early cytokine/chemokine production and on granulocyte and lymphocyte mobilization in LPS-induced pleurisy.

Endothelin ET(B) receptor-mediated mechanisms involved in oleic acid-induced acute lung injury in mice.

The receptors underlying the endothelin-dependent component of lung plasma extravasation and leucocyte infiltration induced by oleic acid were assessed in mice. Oleic acid (1 mg.kg(-1) intravenously), but not endothelin-1 (up to 1 nmol.kg(-1) intravenously), increased accumulation of Evans blue in the lungs (excluding the trachea and main bronchi) from 11.8+/-3.9 to 98.6+/-10.7 microg 1 h after injection. Bosentan, the antagonist of endothelin receptors (ET(A) and ET(B)) or the selective ET(B) receptor antagonists Ro 46-8443 or A-192621 (administered 1 h before oleic acid at doses of 30, 10 and 30 mg x kg(-1) respectively) reduced the effect of oleic acid by 71%, 58% and 79% respectively. However, the selective ET(A) receptor antagonist A-127722.5 (10 mg x kg(-1)) was inactive. Oleic acid (2 mg xkg(-1), intravenously) raised the number of total leucocytes, mononuclear cells and neutrophils in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid 4 h after injection. Bosentan and Ro 46-8443 (at doses of 30 and 10 mg x kg(-1) respectively) inhibited the neutrophil infiltration induced by oleic acid by approx. 80%. None of the antagonists modified control (basal) pulmonary microvascular permeability or total and differential cell counts. Thus, endogenous endothelins, acting via ET(B) receptor-dependent mechanisms, play a major role in oleic acid-induced lung injury in the mouse by promoting infiltration of circulating neutrophils and enhancement of pulmonary microvascular plasma extravasation. These findings suggest that either ET(B) or mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists might be beneficial in the treatment of the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Endothelin-1-induced ET(A) receptor-mediated nociception, hyperalgesia and oedema in the mouse hind-paw: modulation by simultaneous ET(B) receptor activation.

Endothelin-1 causes ET(A) receptor-mediated enhancement of capsaicin-induced nociception in mice. We have assessed if this hyperalgesic effect of endothelin-1 is also accompanied by other pro-inflammatory effects, namely nociception and oedema, and characterized the endothelin ET receptors involved. Intraplantar (i. pl.) hind-paw injection of endothelin-1 (0.3 - 30 pmol) induced graded nociceptive responses (accumulated licking time: vehicle, 20. 5+/-3.3 s; endothelin-1 at 30 pmol, 78.1+/-9.8 s), largely confined to the first 15 min. Endothelin-1 (1 - 10 pmol) potentiated ipsilateral capsaicin-induced (0.1 microgram, i.pl.; at 30 min) nociception (vehicle, 40.2+/-2.6 s; endothelin-1 at 10 pmol, 98.4+/-5.8 s, but 30 pmol was inactive), and caused oedema (increase in paw weight 5 min after capsaicin: vehicle, 46.3+/-2.3 mg; endothelin-1 at 30 pmol, 100.3+/-6.1 mg). Selective ET(B) receptor agonists sarafotoxin S6c (up to 30 pmol) and IRL 1620 (up to 100 pmol) were inactive, whereas endothelin-3 (up to 30 pmol) induced only modest oedema. ET(A) receptor antagonists BQ-123 (1 nmol, i.pl. ) or A-127722-5 (6 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) prevented all effects of endothelin-1 (10 pmol), but the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (1 or 10 nmol, i.pl.) was ineffective. BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.pl.) unveiled hyperalgesic effects of 30 pmol endothelin-1 and endothelin-3. Sarafotoxin S6c (30 pmol, i.pl.) did not modify endothelin-1-induced (10 pmol) nociception or oedema, but abolished hyperalgesia. Thus, endothelin-1 triggers ET(A) receptor-mediated nociception, hyperalgesia and oedema in the mouse hind-paw. Simultaneous activation of ET(B) receptors by endothelin-1 or selective agonists can limit the hyperalgesic, but not the nociceptive or oedematogenic, effects of the peptide.