Change in Pain Score after Administration of Analgesics for Lower Extremity Fracture Pain during Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Effective acute pain management following injury is critical to improve short-and long-term patient outcomes. Analgesics can effectively reduce pain intensity, yet half of injury patients report moderate to severe pain during hospitalization. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to identify the analgesic, different analgesic combinations, or analgesic and adjuvant analgesic combination that generated the largest percent change from pre- to post-analgesic pain score. DESIGN: This was a descriptive retrospective cohort study of 129 adults admitted with lower extremity fractures to a trauma center. METHODS: Name, dose, and frequency of analgesics and adjuvant analgesics administered from admission to discharge were collected from medical records. Percent change was calculated from pain scores documented on the 0-10 numeric rating scale. RESULTS: The analgesic with largest percent change from pre- to post-administration pain score was hydromorphone 2 mg IV (53%) for the emergency department and morphine 4 mg IV (54%) for the in-patient unit. All analgesics administered in the emergency department and ∼50% administered on the in-patient unit produced a minimal (15%) decrease in pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that few analgesics administered in the emergency department and the in-patient unit to patients with lower extremity fractures provide adequate pain relief. In the emergency department, all analgesics administered resulted in at least minimal improvement of pain. On the in-patient unit 13 analgesic doses resulted at least minimal improvement in pain while nine doses did not even reach 20% change in pain. Findings from this study can be used guide the treatment of fracture pain in the hospital.

Baclofen in gamma-hydroxybutyrate withdrawal: patterns of use and online availability.

PURPOSE: Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) withdrawal is a life-threatening condition that does not always respond to standard treatment with benzodiazepines. Baclofen has potential utility as a pharmacological adjunct and anecdotal reports suggest that it is being used by drug users to self-manage GHB withdrawal symptoms. Here, we investigate current patterns of use and the online availably of baclofen. METHODS: Data triangulation techniques were applied to published scientific literature and publicly accessible Internet resources (grey literature) to assess the use of baclofen in GHB withdrawal. An Internet snapshot survey was performed to identify the availability of baclofen for online purchase and the compliance of retailers with the UK regulations. Data were collected according to pre-defined criteria. RESULTS: A total of 37 cases of baclofen use in GHB withdrawal were identified in the scientific literature, as well as 51 relevant discussion threads across eight Internet forums in the grey literature. Baclofen was available to purchase from 38 online pharmacies, of which only one conformed to the UK regulations. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited published evidence on the use of baclofen in GHB withdrawal, but both scientific and grey literature suggests clinical utility. Online pharmacies are readily offering prescription-only-medication without prescription and due to inadequate regulation, pose a danger to the public.

Solubility and Stability of Baclofen 3 mg/mL Intrathecal Formulation and Its Compatibility With Implantable Programmable Intrathecal Infusion Systems.

BACKGROUND: Commercial baclofen formulations used with infusion pumps are available at therapeutic concentrations of 0.5-2.0 mg/mL. However, patients who receive higher daily doses of baclofen may benefit from products with greater baclofen concentrations since their refill frequency would be reduced (up to a maximum of 180 days). We evaluated baclofen solubility, baclofen 3 mg/mL intrathecal (IT) formulation stability, and chemical and physical compatibility with Medtronic SynchroMed® II and Codman Medstream® programmable IT infusion pumps. METHODS: For solubility evaluations, baclofen powder was dissolved into isotonic saline and tested at 5°C, 25°C, and 40°C. To demonstrate drug product stability, both physical and chemical stability attributes of baclofen 3 mg/mL in prefilled syringes were evaluated over 36 months with storage at 25°C. For a simulated in-use stability (compatibility) study, a 3 mg/mL baclofen IT formulation was placed in SynchroMed II and Codman Medstream pumps at 37ºC for study durations, and evaluated at different flow rates. Pump effluent was collected at various times and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for baclofen content. On completion of the in-use stability study, pumps exposed to baclofen 3 mg/mL were dissected and visually evaluated for signs of deterioration. RESULTS: Baclofen solubility was found to be 3.2 mg/mL at 5°C, 3.6 mg/mL at 25°C, and 3.9 mg/mL at 40°C. During the 36-month stability study of prefilled syringes stored at 25°C, baclofen content remained unchanged and no precipitation was observed. The simulated in-use pump study performed at 37ºC showed that a baclofen 3 mg/mL IT formulation was stable at different flow rates and throughout different expected residence times for both pump models. Components from both pumps exhibited no noticeable deterioration after exposure to the 3 mg/mL formulation. CONCLUSION: Baclofen 3 mg/mL IT formulation was stable during long-term storage at 25°C and remained stable under conditions matching those encountered in clinical practice (37°C).

Quality of intrathecal baclofen from different sources.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of intrathecal baclofen obtained from a national compounding pharmacy (AnazaoHealth) with the manufactured product (Lioresal) with regard to accuracy and precision of baclofen concentration, and the content of the baclofen degradation product, 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-pyrrolidinone (PYR). DESIGN: Samples of baclofen used for refilling intrathecal pumps were placed in 1.2-mL silicone gasket-sealed cryogenic vials and stored at or lower than -25°C. Each sample was a different lot number (Lioresal) or prescription number (AnazaoHealth). The laboratory was blinded to the source of the solutions. Coupled with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry analyte confirmation, quantitation of baclofen and PYR in each sample was performed in duplicate by using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection via a photodiode array detector. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with intrathecal baclofen pumps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy and precision of baclofen concentration, and concentration of PYR. RESULTS: The difference of mean concentrations from expected concentrations of 500 and 2000 µg/mL were significantly greater for samples from AnazaoHealth compared with Lioresal. Values are shown as mean (± standard error), with n the number samples, for AnazaoHealth compared with Lioresal: (537.1 ± 6.7 µg/mL [n = 8] versus 515.6 ± 0.82 µg/mL [n = 5]; P = .034, respectively) and (2211.4 ± 21.6 µg/mL [n = 12] versus 2055.3 ± 8.7 µg/mL [n = 4]; P = .004, respectively). AnazaoHealth samples with expected concentration of 4000 µg/mL were 3987.7 ± 79.9 µg/mL, n = 7. All 9 Lioresal samples were within 5% of the expected concentration. Of 27 AnazaoHealth samples, 22 were more than 5%, and 8 were more than 10% different from the expected concentration. No PYR was detected in any sample from AnazaoHealth. All samples of Lioresal contained PYR, but all solutions contained less PYR than 1% of the baclofen concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Lioresal was more accurate in concentration and more precise among batches than compounded intrathecal baclofen but had higher levels of PYR.