[Mavacamten (Camzyos ®) : first myosin modulator for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treatment]. / Le médicament du moisMavacamten (Camzyos®) : premier inhibiteur réversible de l'ATP-ase de la myosine pour le traitement des cardiomyopathies hypertrophiques obstructives.

Mavacamten (Camzyos®) is a myosin modulator which reduces the interactions between myosin and actin. These are overly activated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a source of exaggerated ventricular contractility, energy loss, and impairment of diastolic function (relaxation). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medication Agency (EMA) approved mavacamten for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive HCM (NYHA class II or III) in adult patients in 2022 and 2023, respectively. The medication is not yet reimbursed in Belgium. As seen in its clinical development studies, mavacamten reduces the intraventricular gradient, improves functional capacity and reduces symptoms. It also seems to be an innovative alternative to septal reduction. Mavacamten is usually very well tolerated knowing that, through its mechanism of action, it causes a dose-dependent and reversible reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction, which must therefore be closely monitored. The good tolerance and the effectiveness of mavacamten seem to be maintained over time. Consequently, the recent European Society of Cardiology Updated Guidelines on cardiomyopathy (ESC 09/2023) already recommend mavacamten in the pharmacological management of obstructive HCM.

Le mavacamten (Camzyos®) est un modulateur de la myosine qui diminue les interactions entre la myosine et l'actine. En effet, celles-ci sont trop activées dans la cardiomyopathie hypertrophique (CMH), source de contractilité ventriculaire exagérée, de déperdition énergétique et de troubles de la fonction diastolique (relaxation). Le mavacamten est approuvé par la Food and Drug Administration (FDA 2022) et l'European Medication Agency (EMA 2023) pour le traitement de la CMH obstructive (CMHO) symptomatique (classe NYHA II ou III) chez les patients adultes. Il n'est pas encore remboursé en Belgique. Les études pivots de son développement clinique ont montré que le mavacamten réduit le gradient intraventriculaire, améliore la capacité fonctionnelle et diminue les symptômes. Il semble aussi représenter une alternative innovante à la réduction septale. Le mavacamten est généralement très bien toléré, sachant que, par son mécanisme d'action, il entraîne une diminution dose-dépendante et réversible de la fraction d'éjection ventriculaire gauche, qui devra donc être surveillée étroitement. Sa bonne tolérance et son efficacité semblent se maintenir au cours du temps. En conséquence, les récentes recommandations de la Société Européenne de Cardiologie (ESC 2023) à propos des cardiomyopathies recommandent déjà le mavacamten dans l'arsenal pharmacologique de la prise en charge des CMHO.

Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With or Without Hypertension: Post-Hoc Analysis of the EXPLORER-HCM Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but its effect on the treatment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is undefined. Although elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) may impact dynamic LVOT gradients, its response to cardiac myosin inhibition is unknown. OBJECTIVES: In a post hoc exploratory analysis of the EXPLORER-HCM trial (Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten [MYK-461] in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy), the authors examined the characteristics of patients with obstructive HCM and HTN and the associations between HTN, SBP, and the response to mavacamten treatment of LVOT obstruction. METHODS: Patients were stratified by baseline history of HTN and mean SBP during 30-week treatment with mavacamten or placebo. The study estimated treatment differences and evaluated HTN and SBP groups by treatment interaction. Analysis of covariance was used to model changes in continuous endpoints, and a generalized linear model was used for binary endpoints. RESULTS: HTN was present in 119 of 251 patients (47.4%), including 60 receiving mavacamten and 59 receiving placebo. Patients with HTN vs no HTN were older (63.4 vs 54.0 years; P < 0.001), had higher SBP (134 ± 15.1 mm Hg vs 123 ± 13.8 mm Hg; P < 0.001), more comorbidities, and lower peak oxygen consumption (19 ± 3 vs 20 ± 4 mL/kg/min; P = 0.021). Patients with HTN had similar NYHA functional class (NYHA functional class II, 72% vs 73%), Valsalva LVOT gradients (72 ± 34 mm Hg vs 74 ± 30 mm Hg), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Scores (70.6 ± 18.8 vs 68.9 ± 23.1), and NT pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (geometric mean 632 ± 129 pg/mL vs 745 ± 130 pg/mL). Mavacamten-treated patients had improvement in all primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints regardless of HTN status or mean SBP. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits of mavacamten in symptomatic, obstructive HCM were similar in patients with and without HTN, despite differences in baseline characteristics. (Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten [MYK-461] in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [EXPLORER-HCM]; NCT03470545).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Mavacamten therapy in international cohort of 524 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common heritable myocardial disorder worldwide. Current pharmacological treatment options are limited. Mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, targets the main underlying pathology of HCM. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mavacamten in patients with HCM. PRISMA flow chart was utilized using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for all up-to-date studies using pre-defined keywords. Pre-specified efficacy outcomes comprised several parameters, including an improvement in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and ≥ 1 NYHA class, the need for septal reduction therapy (SRT), change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), changes in biochemical markers and LVEF, along with peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest and after Valsalva maneuver. Safety outcomes included morbidity and serious adverse events. This systematic review included five studies, four RCTs and one non-randomized control trial comprised a total of 524 (Mavacamten [273, 54.3%] vs placebo [230, 45.7%] adult (≥ 18 years) patients with a mean age of 56 years. The study. comprised patients with Caucasian and Chinese ethnicity and patients with obstructive (oHCM) and non-obstructive (nHCM) HCM. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment and placebo groups. Mavacamten showed a statistically significant increase in the frequency of the primary composite endpoint (RR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.28, 2.88]), ≥ 1 NYHA class improvement (RR = 2.10, 95% CI [1.66, 2.67]), a significant decrease in LVEF, peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient at rest and after Valsalva maneuver. Mavacamten also showed a significant reduction in SRT rates (RR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.21, 0.40], p < 0.00001), KCCQ clinical summary scores (MD = 8.08, 95% CI [4.80, 11.37], P < 0.00001) troponin levels and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Mavacamten and placebo regarding the change from baseline peak oxygen consumption. Mavacamten use resulted in a small increase in adverse events but no statistically significant increment in serious adverse events. Our study showed that Mavacamten is a safe and effective treatment option for Caucasian and Chinese patients with HCM on the short-term. Further research is needed to explore the long-term safety and efficacy of Mavacamten with HCM. In addition, adequately powered studies including patients with nHCM is needed to ascertain befits of Mavacamten in those patients.

Mavacamten: a first-in-class myosin inhibitor for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Mavacamten is a first-in-class, targeted, cardiac-specific myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with symptomatic New York Heart Association Classes II and III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Mavacamten was developed to target the hyper-contractile phenotype, which plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of the disease. In Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, mavacamten was well tolerated, reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradients, improved exercise capacity and symptoms, and was associated with improvements in other clinically relevant parameters, such as patient-reported outcomes and circulating biomarkers. In addition, treatment with mavacamten was associated with evidence of favourable cardiac remodelling in multi-modality imaging studies. Mavacamten substantially reduced guideline eligibility for septal reduction therapy candidates with oHCM and drug-refractory symptoms. In this article, the available efficacy and safety data from completed and ongoing clinical studies of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic oHCM are reviewed. Longer term extension studies may help address questions related to the positioning of mavacamten in current oHCM management algorithms, interactions with background therapy, as well as the potential for disease modification beyond symptomatic relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

SYNAPSES. A European observational study to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of safinamide in routine clinical practice: post-hoc analysis of the Spanish study population. / SYNAPSES. Estudio observacional europeo para evaluar la seguridad y la efectividad de la safinamida en la práctica clínica habitual: análisis post hoc de la población española del estudio.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive age-related neurodegenerative condition requiring new therapeutic alternatives. Safinamide, a novel levodopa add-on therapy, positively affects disease fluctuations by modulating both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. To further investigate the use of safinamide in European routine clinical practice, the present post-hoc analysis aimed to understand safinamide's safety profile within the Spanish study population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred eleven Spanish patients with PD were evaluated at baseline, four (±1), eight (±1), and 12 (±1) months after initiating safinamide treatment. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score and UPDRS part III score during on time were used to measure the overall severity of PD and motor complications, respectively, while the severity of adverse events was evaluated following the investigators' criteria. RESULTS: Safinamide showed a favourable safety profile within the Spanish study population, although prescription to patients with psychiatric conditions and off-label use were more frequent than in the European study population. In Spain, clinically meaningful improvements were observed in UPDRS scores when safinamide was used as the only add-on therapy to levodopa (57.4% and 53.7% of patients) and when switching from rasagiline (55.1% of patients). Motor complications were reduced from 83.2% to 63.3% after the study period. Increased safety concerns were undetected in any patient subgroup, although patients with cognitive impairment showed a slightly higher frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This subanalysis further supports safinamide use as a safe and efficacious option for the management of motor fluctuations in different subgroups of levodopa-treated patients. However, safinamide should be used with caution in patients with cognitive impairment.

TITLE: SYNAPSES. Estudio observacional europeo para evaluar la seguridad y la efectividad de la safinamida en la práctica clínica habitual: análisis post hoc de la población española del estudio.Introducción. La enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) es una enfermedad neurodegenerativa progresiva relacionada con la edad que requiere nuevas alternativas terapéuticas. La safinamida, un nuevo tratamiento add-on a la levodopa, afecta positivamente a las fluctuaciones de esta enfermedad al modular los sistemas dopaminérgico y glutamatérgico. Para investigar más a fondo el uso de la safinamida en la práctica clínica rutinaria europea, el presente análisis post hoc tiene como objetivo comprender el perfil de seguridad de la safinamida dentro de la población española del estudio. Pacientes y métodos. Se evaluó a 511 pacientes españoles con EP al inicio, cuatro (±1), ocho (±1) y 12 (±1) meses después de iniciar el tratamiento con safinamida. Se utilizaron la puntuación total de la escala unificada de puntuación de la enfermedad de Parkinson (UPDRS) y la puntuación de la UPDRS III, durante el tiempo en on para medir la gravedad general de la EP y las complicaciones motoras, respectivamente, mientras que la gravedad de los acontecimientos adversos se evaluó siguiendo los criterios de los investigadores. Resultados. La safinamida mostró un perfil de seguridad favorable en la población española del estudio, aunque la prescripción a pacientes con enfermedades psiquiátricas y el uso para indicaciones no autorizadas fueron más frecuentes que en la población europea del estudio. En España se observaron mejoras clínicamente significativas en las puntuaciones de la UPDRS cuando se utilizó la safinamida como único tratamiento add-on a la levodopa (el 57,4 y el 53,7% de los pacientes) y cuando se venía de administrar rasagilina (el 55,1% de los pacientes). Las complicaciones motoras se redujeron del 83,2 al 63,3% tras el período de estudio. No se detectaron mayores problemas de seguridad en ningún subgrupo de pacientes, aunque los pacientes con deterioro cognitivo mostraron una frecuencia algo superior de acontecimientos adversos. Conclusiones. Este subanálisis respalda el uso de la safinamida como opción segura y eficaz para el tratamiento de las fluctuaciones motoras en diferentes subgrupos de pacientes tratados con levodopa. Sin embargo, la safinamida debe utilizarse con precaución en pacientes con deterioro cognitivo.

Transitioning disopyramide to mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A case series and clinical guide.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder for which first-line treatments for obstructive HCM (oHCM) include beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide for refractory cases. Mavacamten, a selective cardiac myosin inhibitor, is indicated for symptomatic oHCM to improve functional capacity and symptoms. Use of disopyramide and mavacamten together is not recommended due to concerns of additive negative inotropic effects. Transitioning from disopyramide to mavacamten may be preferred to avoid adverse effects and frequent administration, however, the best approach for making the transition has not been established. CASES: We present a series of seven patients with oHCM who transitioned from disopyramide to mavacamten and underwent echocardiograms mandated by a Risk Evaluation and Mitigations Strategies program. Two methods were employed. The first approach, involving washout of disopyramide before starting mavacamten, resulted in worsening of heart failure symptoms in the first two cases. The second approach, involving tapering disopyramide when starting mavacamten, was successfully implemented in the last five cases, with no adverse effects or worsening of systolic dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our method of tapering disopyramide when starting mavacamten using a stepwise approach is feasible and safe. Our report fulfills an unmet need by serving as a guide for other clinicians who seek to transition their patients from disopyramide to mavacamten.

Mavacamten, a precision medicine for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: From a motor protein to patients.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary myocardial disorder characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy, hyperdynamic contraction, and impaired relaxation of the heart. These functional derangements arise directly from altered sarcomeric function due to either mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins, or other defects such as abnormal energetics. Current treatment options do not directly address this causal biology but focus on surgical and extra-sarcomeric (sarcolemmal) pharmacological symptomatic relief. Mavacamten (formerly known as MYK-461), is a small molecule designed to regulate cardiac function at the sarcomere level by selectively but reversibly inhibiting the enzymatic activity of myosin, the fundamental motor of the sarcomere. This review summarizes the mechanism and translational progress of mavacamten from proteins to patients, describing how the mechanism of action and pharmacological characteristics, involving both systolic and diastolic effects, can directly target pathophysiological derangements within the cardiac sarcomere to improve cardiac structure and function in HCM. Mavacamten was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2022 for the treatment of obstructive HCM and now goes by the commercial name of Camzyos. Full information about the risks, limitations, and side effects can be found at www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/214998s000lbl.pdf.

Effect of beta-blocker therapy on the response to mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: In the EXPLORER-HCM trial, mavacamten improved exercise capacity and symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Mavacamten effects on the primary endpoint, a composite of peak oxygen consumption (VO2 ) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, were greater in patients not receiving background beta-blockers than in those receiving beta-blockers. We sought to determine if the effect of background treatment was consistent across other clinically meaningful parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subgroup analyses by beta-blocker use were performed in patients with oHCM from the EXPLORER-HCM and mavacamten long-term extension (MAVA-LTE) studies. In EXPLORER-HCM, 189 patients (75.3%) were receiving beta-blockers, and 62 (24.7%) were receiving non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers or no background HCM medication; 170 patients (90.4%) receiving beta-blockers had chronotropic incompetence. Improvements in peak VO2 at week 30 with mavacamten versus placebo were lower with beta-blockers (mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.04 [0.12, 1.95] ml/kg/min) than without beta-blockers (mean difference [95% CI]: 2.69 [1.29, 4.09] ml/kg/min); improvements in non-heart rate-dependent parameters (VE /VCO2 slope) appeared unaffected by beta-blockers. Improvements in functional capacity parameters at week 30 with mavacamten versus placebo were independent of beta-blockade for post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract gradient (mean difference [95% CI]: -37.9 [-48.0, -27.9] mmHg with beta-blockers; -33.5 [-53.6, -13.3] mmHg without beta-blockers), proportion of patients with reduction of ≥1 NYHA class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary scores and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Mavacamten benefits were reproduced and maintained in MAVA-LTE regardless of beta-blockade. CONCLUSION: Mavacamten improved measures of functional capacity, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, symptom burden and biomarkers in patients with HCM regardless of beta-blocker use. Beta-blocker use was often associated with chronotropic incompetence, affecting peak VO2 and other heart rate-dependent measures, but had minimal impact on heart rate-independent measures.

New Era: Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy results from asymmetric septal hypertrophy, which eventually obstructs the outflow of the left ventricle. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is linked to mutations in genes that encode for sarcomere proteins, including actin, ß-myosin heavy chain, titin, and troponin. The mutations lead to structural abnormalities in myocytes and myofibrils, causing conduction irregularities and abnormal force generation. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a chronic disease that worsens over time, and patients become at higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke. Up until recently, there were no disease- specific medications for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nevertheless, the US Food and Drug Administration approved mavacamten on April 28, 2022, for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class II to III) in adults to improve functional capacity and symptoms. Its approval was based on data from EXPLORER- HCM and EXPLORER-LTE (NCT03723655). Mavacamten is a novel, first-in-class, orally active, allosteric inhibitor of cardiac myosin ATPase, which decreases the formation of actin- myosin cross-bridges, and thus, it reduces myocardial contractility, and it improves myocardial energetics. It represents a paradigm-shifting pharmacological treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In this review, we describe its chemical and mechanistic aspects as well as its pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and warnings, potential drug-drug interactions, and contraindications.

Mavacamten Treatment for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common heritable cardiomyopathy, yet pharmacological therapy has been unchanged for decades until the recent introduction of mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in HCM. To date, only 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the outcomes of mavacamten vs placebo for HCM. We used a fixed effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary composite endpoint (PCE) was defined as either ≥1.5 mL/kg/min increase in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) with ≥1 New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) improvement or ≥3.0 mL/kg/min increase in pVO2 without worsening of NYHA-FC. Secondary outcomes included ≥1 NYHA-FC improvement, septal reduction therapy (SRT) or guideline eligible for SRT, ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE), ≥1 treatment emergency adverse event (TEAE), atrial fibrillation (AF), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Three RCTs (n = 422, mean follow-up 24 weeks) were included. Compared to placebo, mavacamten achieved higher rates of PCE (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.28-2.88; P = 0.002) and ≥1 NYHA-FC improvement (RR 2.10; 95% CI 1.66-2.67; P < 0.00001) and lower rates of SRT or guideline eligible for SRT (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.39; P < 0.00001). There were no differences between both groups in ≥1 SAE, AF, and NSVT, however mavacamten had higher rates of ≥1 TEAE. In patients with HCM, mavacamten helps improve pVO2 and NYHA-FC and reduces SRT but may be associated with TEAE. Further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of mavacamten.

Myosin Inhibition and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Referred for Septal Reduction Therapy: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Study.

BACKGROUND: In the randomized phase 3 VALOR-HCM study (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy. Because mavacamten improves ventricular compliance, this sub-study examined the effects of treatment with this cardiac myosin inhibitor on diastolic function. METHODS: Symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients on maximally tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. At baseline and week 16, a resting and stress echocardiogram was performed with interpretation by a core laboratory. In this exploratory substudy, the principal end point was the change in parameters used to define the grade of diastolic function in patients treated with mavacamten and placebo. A related objective was to assess the proportion of patients with an improvement in diastolic function grade. A secondary aim was to assess for correlation between diastolic function parameters and the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM: New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and cardiac biomarkers. RESULTS: Diastolic dysfunction grade was evaluable in 98 patients at baseline and week 16. Among patients treated with mavacamten, 29.4% (15 of 51) demonstrated improvement in diastolic function grade compared with 12.8% (6 of 47) patients with placebo (P=0.05). Average E/e' ratio decreased significantly in patients treated with mavacamten (-3.4±5.3) compared with placebo (0.57±3.5; P<0.001). Indexed left atrial volumes (mL/m2) also decreased significantly in patients who received mavacamten (-5.2±7.8) compared with placebo (-0.51±8.1; P=0.005). After adjustment for change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient and mitral regurgitation, mavacamten was significantly associated with a decrease in average E/e' ratio and indexed left atrial volumes. Change in average E/e' ratio was significantly correlated with the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory substudy, after 16 weeks of therapy, mavacamten improved diastolic function, and this change correlated with improvement in clinical and biomarker end points. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

[Evaluation of the efficacy of dapoxetine in primary and secondary forms of premature ejaculation].

OBJECTIVE: to compare the efficacy of dapoxetine in treatment of primary and secondary premature ejaculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients with premature ejaculation (PE). Depending on the form of premature ejaculation they were divided into two groups: 27 patients with primary PE (group 1) and 33 patients with secondary PE (group 2). Patients were recommended to take dapoxetine 30 mg 1 hour before intercourse. A follow-up visit was scheduled on day 30 after receiving the drug. The intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) and the Premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT) score were evaluated before dapoxetine was given and after 30 days from the start of the study. The significance of differences between baseline and follow-up values were compared using Wilcoxons test. In both groups, the proportion of patients with an incomplete response (IELT less than 2 minutes, PEDT more than 10) to symptomatic therapy with dapoxetine was evaluated. The proportion of patients with incomplete response to therapy was compared using the chi-square test. RESULTS: The median IELT among all patients before starting therapy was 63 seconds (interquartile interval [IQR]: 28.75-94). After one month of therapy median IELT increased to 119 seconds (IQR: 58.75-321.75). Median PEDT score was 16 (IQR: 13-19) at baseline and 7 (IQR: 4-12) at follow-up. In group 1, the median IELT increased from 57 to 83 seconds (p = 0.02088), and in group 2, the median IELT increased from 70 to 173 seconds (p<0.00001). The mean PEDT score decreased to 7 in both groups (p<0.00001). Incomplete response to therapy was observed in 66.7% of patients in group 1 and in 39.4% of patients in group 2. The difference between two groups was statistically significant (p=0.035456). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic therapy with dapoxetine has a positive effect on the intravaginal ejaculation latency time and patient satisfaction in both primary and secondary premature ejaculation. However, the incidence of incomplete response to therapy is higher in patients with primary premature ejaculation, which may be due to characteristic differences in the pathogenesis of primary and secondary premature ejaculation.

An up-to-date overview of the pharmacotherapeutic options for premature ejaculation.

INTRODUCTION: Premature ejaculation (PE) is a sexual dysfunction of unknown etiology affecting a substantial number of males and deteriorating sexual health and quality of life of the patient and his partner. Treatment still remains challenging; however, pharmacotherapy is considered the mainstay of therapy with behavioral and psychosexual interventions being particularly important as adjudicate procedures, within the context of a holistic approach. AREAS COVERED: The authors review the literature on the available medications for PE, both officially registered and non-registered. Currently, only dapoxetine and an anesthetic spray containing lidocaine and prilocaine (Fortacin™) are officially approved, with the rest being used off-label. Herein, updated data regarding the efficacy and safety of the pharmaceutical agents are presented. EXPERT OPINION: On-demand dapoxetine is reportedly efficacious and safe in treating lifelong PE and is the first medication to be approved for this purpose. Fortacin has also shown considerable efficacy and may be reliably used on-demand. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) have been found to be effective in the treatment of PE and are therefore recommended either as monotherapy or combined with other therapies (i.e. dapoxetine). Adverse events of any therapy should be taken under consideration. Physicians should encourage patients to discuss their needs and expectations and grade any improvement of their condition with treatment.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of safinamide as an add-on treatment to levodopa for parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: While levodopa is still the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, concerns about long-term complications such as wearing-off and dyskinesia with levodopa usage remain. AREAS COVERED: Safinamide is a highly selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor introduced in the European Union, Japan, and the United States as an adjunctive agent to levodopa in PD patients with motor fluctuation. This review outlines the pharmacological properties, therapeutic effects, and tolerability of safinamide as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with advanced PD. Efficacy and safety findings from double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials for safinamide as an adjunct therapy to levodopa for PD are summarized. EXPERT OPINION: Safinamide was well tolerated as a treatment for PD, and there was no significant difference in the frequency and severity of adverse events between the safinamide and placebo groups. It was also suggested that safinamide had a beneficial effect on the accompanying non-motor symptoms such as PD-related pain. Safinamide may exhibit neuroprotective effects through antioxidant and anti-glutamate effects, and research on the disease-modifying effect of PD is desired in the future.

Projecting the Long-term Clinical Value of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the United States: An Assessment of Net Health Benefit.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to project the long-term net health benefits of mavacamten for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in the United States. METHODS: A Markov model with 4 mutually exclusive health states (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional classes I, II, and III/IV and death) was developed to project the life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon for patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM receiving mavacamten with or without ß-blocker (BB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy or placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy. The model simulated a patient cohort with a starting age of 59 years and 41% women. Transition probabilities across NYHA functional classes were estimated using data from the Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM) and the EXPLORER long-term extension (EXPLORER-LTE) cohort from the Long-term Safety Extension Study of Mavacamten in Adults who Have Completed MAVERICK-HCM or EXPLORER-HCM (MAVA-LTE) trial and were extrapolated after week 30. The mortality risks of NYHA functional class I were assumed to be the age- and sex-specific mortality risks of the US general population. The mortality risks for NYHA class II and III/IV were estimated using those for class I in conjunction with the relative mortality risks derived using patients with obstructive HCM from a large real-world registry. Health state utilities for each treatment were estimated from EXPLORER-HCM. Both LYs and QALYs were aggregated over a lifetime for each treatment arm, discounted at 3% annually, and compared between the 2 arms. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model findings. FINDINGS: Over a lifetime, treatment with mavacamten with or without BB or CCB monotherapy was associated with 3.67 incremental LYs compared with placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy (13.00 vs 9.33 LYs). Compared with individuals in the placebo group, patients in the mavacamten group were projected to spend 6.17 additional LYs in NYHA functional class I and 0.04 and 2.46 fewer LYs in NYHA functional classes II and III/IV, respectively. With utilities incorporated, mavacamten with or without BB or CCB monotherapy was associated with 4.17 additional QALYs compared with placebo with or without BB or CCB monotherapy (11.74 vs 7.57 QALYs). In the sensitivity analyses, incremental benefits ranged from 1.55 to 6.21 LYs and from 2.48 to 6.19 QALYs across the scenarios. IMPLICATIONS: This model projected substantial net health benefits associated with mavacamten for symptomatic obstructive HCM owing to improved patient survival and quality of life. The projected QALY gain underscored the likely long-term clinical value of mavacamten in symptomatic obstructive HCM.

CaMKII inhibitor KN-93 impaired angiogenesis and aggravated cardiac remodelling and heart failure via inhibiting NOX2/mtROS/p-VEGFR2 and STAT3 pathways.

Persistent cardiac Ca2+ /calmodulin-dependent Kinase II (CaMKII) activation was considered to promote heart failure (HF) development, some studies believed that CaMKII was a target for therapy of HF. However, CaMKII was an important mediator for the ischaemia-induced coronary angiogenesis, and new evidence confirmed that angiogenesis inhibited cardiac remodelling and improved heart function, and some conditions which impaired angiogenesis aggravated ventricular remodelling. This study aimed to investigate the roles and the underlying mechanisms of CaMKII inhibitor in cardiac remodelling. First, we induced cardiac remodelling rat model by ISO, pre-treated by CaMKII inhibitor KN-93, evaluated heart function by echocardiography measurements, and performed HE staining, Masson staining, Tunel staining, Western blot and RT-PCR to test cardiac remodelling and myocardial microvessel density; we also observed ultrastructure of cardiac tissue with transmission electron microscope. Second, we cultured HUVECs, pre-treated by ISO and KN-93, detected cell proliferation, migration, tubule formation and apoptosis, and carried out Western blot to determine the expression of NOX2, NOX4, VEGF, VEGFR2, p-VEGFR2 and STAT3; mtROS level was also measured. In vivo, we found KN-93 severely reduced myocardial microvessel density, caused apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells, enhanced cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial apoptosis, collagen deposition, aggravated the deterioration of myocardial ultrastructure and heart function. In vitro, KN-93 inhibited HUVECs proliferation, migration and tubule formation, and promoted apoptosis of HUVECs. The expression of NOX2, NOX4, p-VEGFR2 and STAT3 were down-regulated by KN-93; mtROS level was severely reduced by KN-93. We concluded that KN-93 impaired angiogenesis and aggravated cardiac remodelling and heart failure via inhibiting NOX2/mtROS/p-VEGFR2 and STAT3 pathways.

Consenso de expertos españoles sobre el uso de la safinamida en la enfermedad de Parkinson / Spanish expert consensus on the use of safinamide in Parkinson's disease

La safinamida es un nuevo fármaco para el tratamiento de pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) con fluctuaciones como tratamiento complementario a levodopa. Dado que por el momento aún no existen estudios de fase IV postautorización debido a la reciente incorporación de la safinamida a la práctica clínica habitual, el interés de este proyecto radica en el desarrollo de una guía de manejo clínico de la safinamida basada en las opiniones de expertos de trastornos del movimiento. Este proyecto se desarrolló en 2 fases: una primera fase que constó de 16 reuniones locales y una segunda fase que consistió en una reunión nacional. Dichas reuniones siguieron un guion de trabajo preestablecido. Tras la reunión nacional se recopilaron las principales conclusiones de los expertos, que han supuesto la base para redactar la presente guía clínica. Se concluyó que la safinamida es eficaz en la reducción de las fluctuaciones motoras y no motoras. Los pacientes con EP con fluctuaciones leves-moderadas son los que más se benefician del tratamiento, si bien el fármaco puede contribuir a mejorar diversos problemas clínicos en pacientes con EP avanzada. Se ha destacado la posibilidad de reducir la dosis de otros fármacos dopaminérgicos tras la introducción de la safinamida, lo cual contribuiría a reducir efectos adversos como el trastorno de control de impulsos. Se hipotetizó sobre el posible efecto de la safinamida sobre la mejoría de las discinesias a dosis más altas de las habitualmente utilizadas. Se ha consensuado que la safinamida es bien tolerada y presenta un perfil de efectos adversos favorable frente a placebo. (AU)

Safinamide is a new add-on drug to levodopa for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations. Due to the recent incorporation of safinamide into routine clinical practice, no post-authorisation phase IV studies on the safety of safinamide have been conducted to date. This study provides clinical management guidelines for safinamide based on the opinion of a group of experts in movement disorders. This project was developed in 2 phases: 16 local meetings in phase 1 and a national meeting in phase 2. The meetings followed a pre-established agenda. The present clinical practice guidelines are based on the main conclusions reached during the national meeting. The group concluded that safinamide is effective in reducing motor and non-motor fluctuations. PD patients with mild-to-moderate fluctuations benefit most from treatment, although the drug may also improve the clinical status of patients with advanced PD. The dose of other dopaminergic drugs may be reduced after introducing safinamide, which would contribute to reducing such adverse reactions as impulse control disorder. At doses higher than those usually prescribed, safinamide may also improve dyskinesia. The experts agreed that safinamide is well tolerated and causes few adverse reactions when compared with placebo. (AU)

Spanish expert consensus on the use of safinamide in Parkinson's disease.

Safinamide is a new add-on drug to levodopa for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations. Due to the recent incorporation of safinamide into routine clinical practice, no post-authorisation phase IV studies on the safety of safinamide have been conducted to date. This study provides clinical management guidelines for safinamide based on the opinion of a group of experts in movement disorders. This project was developed in 2 phases: 16 local meetings in phase 1 and a national meeting in phase 2. The meetings followed a pre-established agenda. The present clinical practice guidelines are based on the main conclusions reached during the national meeting. The group concluded that safinamide is effective in reducing motor and non-motor fluctuations. PD patients with mild-to-moderate fluctuations benefit most from treatment, although the drug may also improve the clinical status of patients with advanced PD. The dose of other dopaminergic drugs may be reduced after introducing safinamide, which would contribute to reducing such adverse reactions as impulse control disorder. At doses higher than those usually prescribed, safinamide may also improve dyskinesia. The experts agreed that safinamide is well tolerated and causes few adverse reactions when compared with placebo.

Formulation and evaluation of butenafine loaded PLGA-nanoparticulate laden chitosan nano gel.

The present research work is designed to prepare and optimize butenafine (BT) loaded poly lactic co glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (BT-NPs). BT-NPs were prepared by emulsification probe sonication method using PLGA (A), PVA (B) as polymer and stabilizer, respectively. The optimum composition of BT-NPs was selected based on the point prediction method given by the Box Behnken design software. The optimized composition of BT-NPop showed a particle size of 267.21 ± 3.54 nm with an entrapment efficiency of 72.43 ± 3.11%. The optimum composition of BT-NPop was further converted into gel formulation using chitosan as a natural polymer. The prepared topical gel formulation (BT-NPopG) was further evaluated for gel characterization, drug release, permeation study, irritation, and antifungal studies. The prepared BT-NPopG formulation showed optimum pH, viscosity, spreadability, and drug content. The release and permeation study results revealed slow BT release (42.76 ± 2.87%) with significantly enhanced permeation across the egg membrane. The irritation study data showed negligible irritation with a cumulative score of 0.33. The antifungal study results conclude higher activity than marketed as well as pure BT. The overall conclusion of the results revealed BT-NPopG as an ideal delivery system to treat topical fungal infection.