Detection of Novel BEST1 Variations in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy Using Third-generation Sequencing.

OBJECTIVE: Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), a retinal degenerative disease, is characterized by central visual loss, yellowish multifocal diffuse subretinal deposits, and a dramatic decrease in the light peak on electrooculogram. The potential pathogenic mechanism involves mutations in the BEST1 gene, which encodes Ca2+-activated Cl- channels in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), resulting in degeneration of RPE and photoreceptor. In this study, the complete clinical characteristics of two Chinese ARB families were summarized. METHODS: Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing was performed on the probands to screen for disease-causing gene mutations, and Sanger sequencing was applied to validate variants in the patients and their family members. RESULTS: Two novel mutations, c.202T>C (chr11:61722628, p.Y68H) and c.867+97G>A, in the BEST1 gene were identified in the two Chinese ARB families. The novel missense mutation BEST1 c.202T>C (p.Y68H) resulted in the substitution of tyrosine with histidine in the N-terminal region of transmembrane domain 2 of bestrophin-1. Another novel variant, BEST1 c.867+97G>A (chr11:61725867), located in intron 7, might be considered a regulatory variant that changes allele-specific binding affinity based on motifs of important transcriptional regulators. CONCLUSION: Our findings represent the first use of third-generation sequencing (TGS) to identify novel BEST1 mutations in patients with ARB, indicating that TGS can be a more accurate and efficient tool for identifying mutations in specific genes. The novel variants identified further broaden the mutation spectrum of BEST1 in the Chinese population.

BEST4+ cells in the intestinal epithelium.

The recent development of single-cell transcriptomics highlighted the existence of a new lineage of mature absorptive cells in the human intestinal epithelium. This subpopulation is characterized by the specific expression of Bestrophin 4 (BEST4) and of other marker genes including OTOP2, CA7, GUCA2A, GUCA2B, and SPIB. BEST4+ cells appear early in development and are present in all regions of the small and large intestine at a low abundance (<5% of all epithelial cells). Location-specific gene expression profiles in BEST4+ cells suggest their functional specialization in each gut region, as exemplified by the small intestine-specific expression of the ion channel CFTR. The putative roles of BEST4+ cells include sensing and regulation of luminal pH, tuning of guanylyl cyclase-C signaling, transport of electrolytes, hydration of mucus, and secretion of antimicrobial peptides. However, most of these hypotheses lack functional validation, notably because BEST4+ cells are absent in mice. The presence of BEST4+ cells in human intestinal organoids indicates that this in vitro model should be suitable to study their role. Recent studies showed that BEST4+ cells are also present in the intestinal epithelium of macaque, pig, and zebrafish and, here, we report their presence in rabbits, which suggests that these species could be appropriate animal models to study BEST4+ cells during the development of diseases and their interactions with environmental factors such as diet or the microbiota. In this review, we summarize the existing literature regarding BEST4+ cells and emphasize the description of their predicted roles in the intestinal epithelium in health and disease.NEW & NOTEWORTHY BEST4+ cells are a novel subtype of mature absorptive cells in the human intestinal epithelium highlighted by single-cell transcriptomics. The gene expression profile of BEST4+ cells suggests their role in pH regulation, electrolyte secretion, mucus hydration, and innate immune defense. The absence of BEST4+ cells in mice requires the use of alternative animal models or organoids to decipher the role of this novel type of intestinal epithelial cells.

Allele-specific antisense oligonucleotides for the treatment of BEST1-related dominantly inherited retinal diseases: An in vitro model.

Retinal dystrophies are a common health problem worldwide that are currently incurable due to the inability of retinal cells to regenerate. Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a diverse group of disorders characterized by progressive vision loss caused by photoreceptor cell dysfunction. The eye has always been an attractive organ for the development of novel therapies due to its independent access to the systemic pathway. Moreover, anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASOs), which facilitate manipulation of unwanted mRNAs via degradation or splicing, are undergoing rapid development and have been clinically deployed for the treatment of several diseases. The primary aim of this study was to establish a reliable in vitro model utilizing induced photoreceptor-like cells (PRCs) for assessing the efficacy and safety of ASOs targeting the BEST1 gene. Despite advances in gene therapy, effective treatments for a broad range of IRDs remain limited. An additional aim was to develop an in vitro model for evaluating RNA-based therapeutics, specifically ASOs, for the treatment in IRDs. Firstly, a cell culture model was established by induction of PRCs from dermal fibroblasts via direct programming. The induced PRCs were characterized at both the transcriptomic and protein level. Then, a common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was identified in the BEST1 gene (rs1800007) for targeting with ASOs. ASOs were designed using the GapmeR strategy to target multiple alleles of this SNP, which is potentially suitable for a large proportion of the population. The efficacy and possible off-target effects of these ASOs were also analyzed in the induced PRC model. The findings show that the selected ASOs achieved allele-specific mRNA degradation with virtually no off-target effects on the global transcriptome profile, indicating their potential as safe and effective therapeutic agents. The presented in vitro model is a valuable platform for testing personalized IRD treatments and should inspire further research on RNA-based therapeutics. To the best of our knowledge this study is the first to test RNA-based therapeutics involving the use of ASOs in an induced PRC model. Based on the present findings, it will be possible to establish an ex vivo disease model using dermal fibroblast samples from affected individuals. In other words, the disease model and the ASOs that were successfully designed in this study can serve as a useful platform for the testing of personalized treatments for IRDs.

Typical best vitelliform dystrophy secondary to biallelic variants in BEST1.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic variants in BEST1 can cause autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive dystrophy, typically associated with distinct retinal phenotypes. In heterozygous cases, the disorder is commonly characterized by yellow sub-macular lesions in the early stages, known as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Biallelic variants usually cause a more severe phenotype including diffuse retinal pigment epithelial irregularity and widespread generalized progressive retinopathy, known as autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). This study describes three cases with clinical changes consistent with BVMD, however, unusually associated with autosomal recessive inheritance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed ophthalmic workup included comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, multimodal retinal imaging, full-field and pattern electroretinography (ERG; PERG), and electrooculogram (EOG). Genetic analysis of probands and segregation testing and fundus examination of proband relatives was performed where possible. RESULTS: Three unrelated cases presented with a clinical phenotype typical for BVMD and were found to have biallelic disease-causing variants in BEST1. PERG P50 and ERG were normal in all cases. The EOG was subnormal (probands 1 and 3) or normal/borderline (proband 2). Probands 1 and 2 were homozygous for the BEST1 missense variant c.139C>T, p.Arg47Cys, while proband 3 was homozygous for a deletion, c.536_538delACA, p.Asn179del. The parents of proband 1 were phenotypically normal. Parents of proband 1 and 2 were heterozygous for the same missense variant. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with biallelic variants in BEST1 can present with a phenotype indistinguishable from BVMD. The same clinical phenotype may not be evident in those harboring the same variants in the heterozygous state. This has implications for genetic counselling and prognosticationA.

Non-vasogenic cystoid maculopathy in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: novel insights from NIR-FAF and OCTA imaging.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB) is an inherited retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations in the BEST1 gene. Herein, we report the multimodal imaging findings of ARB presenting with cystoid maculopathy and investigate the short-term response to combined systemic and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, prospective, case series on two siblings affected by ARB is presented. Patients underwent genetic testing and optical coherence tomography (OCT), blue-light fundus autofluorescence (BL-FAF), near-infrared fundus autofluorescence (NIR-FAF), fluorescein angiography (FA), MultiColor imaging, and OCT angiography (OCTA). RESULTS: Two male siblings, aged 22 and 16, affected by ARB resulting from c.598C>T, p.(Arg200*) and c.728C>A, p.(Ala243Glu) BEST1 compound heterozygous variants, presented with bilateral multifocal yellowish pigment deposits scattered through the posterior pole that corresponded to hyperautofluorescent deposits on BL-FAF. Vice versa, NIR-FAF mainly disclosed wide hypoautofluorescent areas in the macula. A cystoid maculopathy and shallow subretinal fluid were evident on structural OCT, albeit without evidence of dye leakage or pooling on FA. OCTA demonstrated disruption of the choriocapillaris throughout the posterior pole and sparing of intraretinal capillary plexuses. Six months of combined therapy with oral acetazolamide and topical brinzolamide resulted in limited clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: We reported two siblings affected by ARB, presenting as non-vasogenic cystoid maculopathy. Prominent alteration of NIR-FAF signal and concomitant choriocapillaris rarefaction on OCTA were noted in the macula. The limited short-term response to combined systemic and topical CAIs might be explained by the impairment of the RPE-CC complex.

Multimodal imaging in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy: Literature review and novel insights.

Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) is a dominantly inherited retinal disease caused by dominant variants in the BEST1 gene. The original classification of BVMD is based on biomicroscopy and color fundus photography (CFP); however, advancements in retinal imaging provided unique structural, vascular, and functional data and novel insights on disease pathogenesis. Quantitative fundus autofluorescence studies informed us that lipofuscin accumulation, the hallmark of BVMD, is unlikely to be a primary effect of the genetic defect. It could be due to a lack of apposition between photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium in the macula with subsequent accumulation of shed outer segments over time. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and adaptive optics imaging revealed that vitelliform lesions are characterized by progressive changes in the cone mosaic corresponding to a thinning of the outer nuclear layer and then disruption of the ellipsoid zone, which are associated with a decreased sensitivity and visual acuity. Therefore, an OCT staging system based on lesion composition, thus reflecting disease evolution, has been recently developed. Lastly, the emerging role of OCT Angiography proved a greater prevalence of macular neovascularization, the majority of which are non-exudative and develop in late disease stages. In conclusion, effective diagnosis, staging, and clinical management of BVMD will likely require a deep understanding of the multimodal imaging features of this disease.

Novel IMPG2 variant causing adult macular vitelliform dystrophy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) is an inherited maculopathy characterized by metamorphopsias and decrease in visual acuity occurring between the fourth and the sixth decade. It is characterized by an 'egg yolk' macular lesion eventually evolving towards foveal atrophy and fibrosis. It is usually an autosomal dominant inherited disorder with variable penetrance, mainly related to variants in BEST1, PRPH2, IMPG1, and IMPG2 genes. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 47-year-old woman complaining of "wavy" vision was referred to our clinic. Her past medical history and reported family history did not reveal any ocular disease. Complete ophthalmological evaluation was performed. Funduscopic examination and multimodal imaging revealed a round vitelliform lesion in both eyes, leading to a diagnosis of AVMD. Genetic analysis revealed a novel, likely pathogenetic, heterozygous c.478G > T (p.Glu160Ter), (NM_016247) variant in the IMPG2 gene. DISCUSSION: Our patient exhibits a novel pathogenetic variant in a gene associated with AVMD. Heterozygous variants in the IMPG2 gene have been reported in multiple individuals with vitelliform macular dystrophy, with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. Genetic screening is essential to characterize patients, to predict vision loss in patients with a positive family history and to characterize eligible patients for new potential emerging therapies. Genotype-phenotype correlation studies are needed to have a clearer picture of pathogenetic mechanisms. Our study characterizes the phenotype related to a novel IMPG2 pathogenic variant through multimodal imaging.

The Retinal Phenotype Associated with the p.Pro101Thr BEST1 Variant.

PURPOSE: To describe the retinal phenotype associated with the p.Pro101Thr BEST1 variant. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with bestrophinopathies in which molecular genetic testing identified the p.Pro101Thr BEST1 as well as healthy carriers among their first-degree relatives. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to obtain data on family history and ophthalmic examinations, including retinal imaging. The imaging protocol included OCT and fundus autofluorescence using Spectralis HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). Genetic analysis was performed by next-generation sequencing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of ophthalmic examinations and multimodal imaging features of retinal phenotypes. RESULTS: The c.301C>A, p.Pro101Thr BEST1 missense variant was identified as the causative variant in 8 individuals (all men) from 5 families, accounting for 13% of cases (8/61) and 10% of pathogenic alleles (9/93) in our cohort of patients affected by bestrophinopathies. Seven individuals (14 eyes) had the variant in heterozygous status: all eyes had a hyperopic refractive error (median spherical equivalent of + 3.75 diopters [D]) and 4 individuals had a macular dystrophy with mildly reduced visual acuity (median of 20/25 Snellen), whereas the other 3 were asymptomatic carriers. On multimodal retinal imaging, 5 (36%) out of 14 eyes had subclinical bestrophinopathy, 4 (29%) had typical findings of adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD), and the remaining 5 (36%) displayed a pattern dystrophy-like phenotype. Follow-up data were available for 6 subjects, demonstrating clinical stability up to 11 years, in both subclinical and clinical forms. An additional patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy was found to harbor the p.Pro101Thr variant in homozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: The p.Pro101Thr BEST1 variant is likely a frequent cause of bestrophinopathy in the Italian population and can result in autosomal dominant macular dystrophies with incomplete penetrance and mild clinical manifestations as well as autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. The spectrum of autosomal dominant maculopathy includes the typical AOFVD and a pattern dystrophy-like phenotype. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comprehensive Genetic Analysis Unraveled the Missing Heritability and a Founder Variant of BEST1 in a Chinese Cohort With Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy.

Purpose: To describe the genetic landscape of BEST1 for a large Chinese cohort with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), identify the missing heritability, and report a common Chinese founder variant. Methods: We recruited 65 patients from 63 families with a clinical diagnosis of ARB. All patients underwent ophthalmic examinations and comprehensive genetic analyses, including Sanger DNA sequencing of BEST1 and whole genome sequencing (WGS). The effects of deep intronic variants (DIVs) on splicing were assessed using in vitro splicing assays in HEK293T cells and patient-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Haplotype mapping was performed for 17 unrelated patients harboring variant c.867+97G>A. Results: We identified 54 distinct disease-causing variants of BEST1 in 63 pedigrees, 62 probands with biallelic variants, and one family with monoallelic variants. Sanger DNA sequencing of BEST1 initially detected 51 variants in 61 pedigrees, including 19 probands with one heterozygous variant. Subsequent WGS, combined with supplementary Sanger sequencing, revealed three missing DIVs (c.1101-491A>G, c.867+97G>A, and c.867+97G>T) in 20 families. The novel DIV c.1101-491A>G caused an abnormal splicing resulting in a 204-nt pseudoexon (PE) insertion, whereas c.867+97G>A/T relatively strengthened an alternative donor site, resulting in a 203-nt intron retention (IR). The PE and IR generated a premature termination codon downstream. Haplotype analysis identified c.867+97G>A as a common founder variant with an allele frequency of 16%. Conclusions: Our results expand the pathogenic variant spectrum of BEST1, and DIVs can explain almost all of the missing heritability. The c.867+97G>A DIV is a common founder variant for Chinese patients with ARB.

Variants of BEST1 and CRYBB2 cause a complex ocular phenotype comprising microphthalmia, microcornea, cataract, and vitelliform macular dystrophy: case report.

BACKGROUND: Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), caused by pathogenic variants of the BEST1 gene, has not been reported in association with cataracts and ocular malformations. We reported a case with a complex ocular phenotype comprising microphthalmia, microcornea, cataract, and vitelliform macular dystrophy. CASE PRESENTATION: A six-year-old girl manifested photophobia and a poor visual behavior. A thorough ophthalmic examination revealed the patient to have bilateral microphthalmia, microcornea, congenital cataract, and Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Whole exome sequencing (WES) identified one variant in the BEST1 and one variant in CRYBB2 genes: c.218 T > G p.(Ile73Arg) and c.479G > C p.(Arg160Pro). The first variant was inherited from the proband's father, who was diagnosed with subclinical BVMD, while the second was a de novo variant. A minigene assay showed that c.218 T > G in BEST1 did not affect pre-mRNA splicing. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that the complex ocular phenotype comprising BVMD and congenital cataract with microphthalmia cannot be explained by variation in one gene but is caused by variants in BEST1 and CRYBB2. This case highlights the importance of general clinical evaluation and comprehensive genetic testing for diagnosing complex eye diseases.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy combined with neurofibromatosis type 1 in a patient.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder that may affect multiple systems of the body. Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a rare retinal dystrophy caused by autosomal recessively mutations in bestrophin 1 (BEST1) gene. So far, we have not retrieved any case report of the same patient with both NF1 and BEST1 gene mutations. CASE PRESENTATION: An 8-year-old female patient with café-au-lait spots, freckling on skin presented to our ophthalmology clinic for routine ophthalmological examination. Her best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination of both eyes revealed few yellowish-brown dome-shaped Lisch nodules over the iris surface. Fundus examination was notable for bilateral confluent yellowish subretinal deposits at macula, few yellow flecks at temporal retina, and cup-to-disc ratio of 0.2. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed subretinal fluid (SRF) involving the fovea, elongated photoreceptor outer segments and mild intraretinal fluid (IRF) at bilateral macula. Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated hyperautofluorescence in the area corresponding to the subretinal deposits. Whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing were used to investigate genetic mutation in the patient and her parents. A BEST1 gene heterozygous missense c.604 C > T (p.Arg202Trp) was identified in the patient and her mother. Also, the patient carries an NF1 nonsense mutation c.6637 C > T (p.Gln2213*) with the mosaic generalized phenotype. There were no visual impairments or obvious neurological, musculoskeletal, behavioral or other symptoms in this patient, so she was managed conservatively and advised to follow up regularly for a long time. CONCLUSIONS: ARB and NF1, which are caused by two different pathogenic gene mutations, have rarely coexisted in the same patient. The discovery of pathogenic gene mutations may play a crucial role in more accurate diagnostics and genetic consultations for individuals and their families.

Elaborate Evaluation of Farnsworth Dichotomous D-15 Panel Test Can Help Differentiate between Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy and Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy.

INTRODUCTION: The colour vision in bestrophinopathies has not been assessed in detail so far. The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which distinct types of bestrophinopathies differ in regard to colour vision deficiencies using Farnsworth Dichotomous D-15 and Lanthony Desaturated D-15 panel tests. METHODS: Both D-15 tests were performed in 52 eyes of 26 patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and 10 eyes of 5 patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Two methods were used for a quantitative assessment of the colour vision deficiencies: moment of inertia method and Bowman method. The following parameters were calculated: confusion angle, confusion index (C-index), selectivity index (S-index), total error score (TES), and colour confusion index (CCI). RESULTS: The median value of confusion angle for all stages of BVMD fell into a narrow range around 62, indicating normal results. The median confusion angle value was 57 in ARB patients within a very wide range down to -82, indicating non-specific deficits. These differences were statistically significant. Significantly abnormal C-index and CCI values were found only in ARB patients, being 2.0 and 1.49, respectively. The majority of parameters of D-15 tests were independent of the visual acuity in both bestrophinopathies. CONCLUSIONS: Elaborate evaluation of the D-15 panel tests might help establish a differential diagnosis between different bestrophinopathies, as the pattern of the colour vision loss is different between BVMD and ARB. The quantitative parameters of colour vision tests in bestrophinopathies are independent of the visual acuity.

BEST1 novel mutation causes Bestrophinopathies in six families with distinct phenotypic diversity.

PURPOSE: To report novel BEST1 variants in six Chinese families with bestrophinopathies of two different inheritance modes and analyze the intrafamilial phenotypic diversity. METHOD: A total of 25 participants including 13 patients and 12 healthy family members from 6 Chinese families with bestrophinopathies were available for genetic and clinical analysis. All of the patients were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and exome sequencing was performed on the probands to detect the causative variants. The pathogenicity of gene variants was predicted using silico analysis and evaluated according to ACMG guidelines. All (likely) pathogenic variants were determined by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analyses were performed on available family members. The relevant original literature previously reported was retrieved to explore the relationship between BEST1-related gene variants and clinical features. RESULTS: In the 6 families, 3 families (10 patients) were assigned as autosomal dominant bestrophinopathies (VMD) and 3 families (3 patients) were assigned as Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathies (ARB). A total of 9 variants on the BEST1 gene were identified, containing 7 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, and 1 frameshift variant, respectively, of which 3 variants c.88A > G (p.Lys30Glu), c.764G > A (p.Arg255Gln) and c.233dupT (p.Ser79Phefs*153) were novel variants. Three families with ARB were detected with heterozygous variants on the BEST1 gene.2 families (8 patients) with BVMD showed markedly irregular dominant inheritance, and the severity of macular lesions varies greatly among individuals of the same family. Among them, the probands showed typical vitelliform lesions in the macula, while the other six patients had no visible signs of the disease by fundus photography (ophthalmoscopy) and minor lesions could be detected on OCT in two patients, the continuity of the ellipsoidal band was interrupted with the chimeric band. The phenotypes of the patients in the three ARB families ranged from typical/atypical vitelliform lesions to extensive extramacular deposits (peripheral spots). CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence that the phenotype of BVMD manifested irregular dominant inheritance, with patients carrying a pathogenic heterozygous variant of BEST1 to develop obvious intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, and the patients who harbor two pathogenic alleles showed recessive inheritance bestrophinopathies with distinct phenotypic diversity. Our study also emphasized the importance of comprehensive genetic analysis in patients with bestrophinopathies, and in such challenging families with distinct intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, it shall provide novel insights into phenotypic assessments of bestrophinopathies, and contribute to better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for these patients.

Photoreceptor function and structure in retinal degenerations caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations.

The only approved retinal gene therapy is for biallelic RPE65 mutations which cause a recessive retinopathy with a primary molecular defect located at the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). For a distinct recessive RPE disease caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations, a pre-clinical proof-of-concept for gene therapy has been demonstrated in canine eyes. The current study was undertaken to consider potential outcome measures for a BEST1 clinical trial in patients demonstrating a classic autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) phenotype. Spatial distribution of retinal structure showed a wide expanse of abnormalities including large intraretinal cysts, shallow serous retinal detachments, abnormalities of inner and outer segments, and an unusual prominence of the external limiting membrane. Surrounding the central macula extending from 7 to 30 deg eccentricity, outer nuclear layer was thicker than expected from a cone only retina and implied survival of many rod photoreceptors. Co-localized however, were large losses of rod sensitivity despite preserved cone sensitivities. The dissociation of rod function from rod structure observed, supports a large treatment potential in the paramacular region for biallelic bestrophinopathies.

Genetic treatment for autosomal dominant inherited retinal dystrophies: approaches, challenges and targeted genotypes.

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) have been in the front line of gene therapy development for the last decade, providing a useful platform to test novel therapeutic approaches. More than 40 clinical trials have been completed or are ongoing, tackling autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions, mostly through adeno-associated viral vector delivery of a normal copy of the disease-causing gene. However, only recently has autosomal dominant (ad) disease been targeted, with the commencement of a trial for rhodopsin (RHO)-associated retinitis pigmentosa (RP), implementing antisense oligonucleotide (AON) therapy, with promising preliminary results (NCT04123626).Autosomal dominant RP represents 15%-25% of all RP, with RHO accounting for 20%-30% of these cases. Autosomal dominant macular and cone-rod dystrophies (MD/CORD) correspond to approximately 7.5% of all IRDs, and approximately 35% of all MD/CORD cases, with the main causative gene being BEST1 Autosomal dominant IRDs are not only less frequent than recessive, but also tend to be less severe and have later onset; for example, an individual with RHO-adRP would typically become severely visually impaired at an age 2-3 times older than in X-linked RPGR-RP.Gain-of-function and dominant negative aetiologies are frequently seen in the prevalent adRP genes RHO, RP1 and PRPF31 among others, which would not be effectively addressed by gene supplementation alone and need creative, novel approaches. Zinc fingers, RNA interference, AON, translational read-through therapy, and gene editing by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas are some of the strategies that are currently under investigation and will be discussed here.

ADULT-ONSET BEST1 -VITELLIFORM DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATED WITH ANGIOID STREAK-LIKE CHANGES IN TWO SIBLINGS.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To describe the association between autosomal dominant Best disease and peripapillary angioid streak-like changes. METHODS: Case report of two siblings. RESULTS: A 76-year-old White man was referred for evaluation of bilateral macular changes and worsening visual distortion over the preceding 2 years. Best-corrected visual acuity measured 20/30 in the right eye and 20/80 in the left eye. Funduscopic examination revealed multifocal yellow lesions in the posterior pole that were hyperautofluorescent on short-wavelength excitation and corresponded with subretinal hyperreflective material on optical coherence tomography. The posterior pole examination was interesting because of the juxtapapillary involvement of the vitelliform lesions and the presence of bilateral peripapillary angioid streak-like changes despite no history of conditions associated with angioid streaks. On further workup, an electrooculogram revealed reduced Arden ratios and a known heterozygous missense mutation in BEST1 (c.903T>G; p .D301E) was found. The patient's 69-year-old younger brother was brought in and found to have a remarkably similar phenotype, including the presence of angioid streak-like changes associated with the same BEST1 mutation. CONCLUSION: These two cases demonstrate the possibility of late-onset multifocal vitelliform disease due to dominantly inherited BEST1 . A consistent phenotype in this family with macular lesions extending into the peripapillary region, associated with angioid streak-like changes, suggests susceptibility of this region to changes in dominant BEST1 -vitelliform macular dystrophy.

A novel compound heterozygous BEST1 gene mutation in two siblings causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features, imaging characteristics, and genetic test results associated with a novel compound heterozygous mutation of the BEST1 gene in two siblings with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. METHODS: Two siblings underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. A clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy was established based on ocular examination and multimodal retinal imaging. Subsequently, clinical exome sequencing consisting of a panel of 6670 genes was carried out to confirm the diagnosis and assess genetic alterations in the protein-coding region of the genome of the patients. The identified mutations were tested in the two affected siblings and one of their parents. RESULTS: Two siblings (a 17-year-old female and a 15-year-old male) presented with reduced visual acuity and bilaterally symmetrical subretinal deposits of hyperautofluorescent materials in the posterior pole, which showed staining in the late phase of fluorescein angiogram. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated hyperreflective subretinal deposits and subretinal fluid accumulation. Both patients shared two mutations in the protein-coding region of the BEST1 gene, c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) and c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) (a novel disease-causing mutation). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the unaffected mother of the proband was carrying p.(Glu35Lys) variant in a heterozygous state. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified and described the phenotype of a novel disease-causing mutation NM_004183.4:c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) in a heterozygous state along with a previously reported mutation NM_004183.4:c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) of the BEST1 gene in two related patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

Photoreceptor Function and Structure in Autosomal Dominant Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Caused by BEST1 Mutations.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate rod and cone function and outer retinal structure within macular lesions, and surrounding extralesional areas of patients with autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy caused by BEST1 mutations. Methods: Seventeen patients from seven families were examined with dark- and light-adapted chromatic perimetry and optical coherence tomography. Subsets of patients had long-term follow-up (14-22 years, n = 6) and dark-adaptation kinetics measured (n = 5). Results: Within central lesions with large serous retinal detachments, rod sensitivity was severely reduced but visual acuity and cone sensitivity were relatively retained. In surrounding extralesional areas, there was a mild but detectable widening of the subretinal space in some patients and some retinal areas. Available evidence was consistent with subretinal widening causing slower dark-adaptation kinetics. Over long-term follow-up, some eyes showed formation of de novo satellite lesions at retinal locations that years previously demonstrated subretinal widening. A subclinical abnormality consisting of a retina-wide mild thickening of the outer nuclear layer was evident in many patients and thickening increased in the subset of patients with long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Outcome measures for future clinical trials should include evaluations of rod sensitivity within central lesions and quantitative measures of outer retinal structure in normal-appearing regions surrounding the lesions.

A pathogenic in-frame deletion-insertion variant in BEST1 phenocopies Stargardt disease.

Here, we describe affected members of a 2-generation family with a Stargardt disease-like phenotype caused by a 2-base pair deletion insertion, c.1014_1015delGAinsCT;p.(Trp338_Asn339delinsCysTyr), in BEST1. The variant was identified by whole-exome sequencing, and its pathogenicity was verified through chloride channel recording using WT and transfected mutant HEK293 cells. Clinical examination of both patients revealed similar phenotypes at 2 different disease stages that were attributable to differences in their age at presentation. Hyperautofluorescent flecks along the arcades were observed in the proband, while the affected mother exhibited more advanced retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss in the central macula. Full-field electroretinogram testing was unremarkable in the daughter; however, moderate attenuation of generalized cone function was detected in the mother. Results from electrooculogram testing in the daughter were consistent with widespread dysfunction of the RPE characteristic of Best disease. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings revealed a statistically significant decrease in chloride conductance of the mutant compared with WT cells. This report on a mother and daughter with a BEST1 genotype that phenocopies Stargardt disease broadens the clinical spectrum of BEST1-associated retinopathy.