Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 336
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 127: 108982, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334370

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the potential cost-savings of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) over open surgical biopsy (OSB) in diagnosis of nonpalpable lesions on mammography and to estimate the cost-saving effect on lesions at different levels of malignant probability. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. We retrospectively reviewed 276 (33.8 %) SVAB and 541 (66.2 %) OSB medical records at a medical center. Direct costs included patients' self-paid and national health insurance claim charges. Indirect costs were calculated using sick days, average salary, and age-adjusted employment rate. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Lesion classification was determined by the assessment categories of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th or 5th editions. RESULTS: SVAB decreased the direct cost by $90.3 (10.1 %) per diagnosis. The indirect cost was decreased by $560.2 (96.0 %). Overall, SVAB saved 43.9 % of resource utilization for each biopsy. Taking the cost of the subsequent malignant surgery into account, from the healthcare providers' perspective, SVAB was cost-effective if a lesion had less than 19 % likelihood of malignancy. From the societal perspective, SVAB reduced productivity loss for all the lesions. Based on the positive predictive value of the BI-RADS categories, SVAB was more suitable for the lesions of category 4A and category 3, resulting in greater savings in both medical and societal resources. CONCLUSIONS: SVAB is a cost-effective diagnostic option for nonpalpable breast lesions. The cost-saving effect is greater for the lesions of category 4A and category 3.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamografía/métodos , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Mama/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Mamografía/economía , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacio
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(5): 1133-1140, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272240

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic surgery for benign-appearing ovarian endometrioma. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort pilot study. SETTING: Multiple centers, Spain. PATIENTS: Forty patients with suspected ovarian endometrioma identified by US, with a maximum diameter of 35 to 100 mm, of whom 33 met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The study group (n = 17) underwent US-guided aspiration plus sclerotherapy with ethanol, and the control group (n = 14) underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recurrence, complications, and direct costs were compared. One of 17 sclerotherapy patients recurred (5.9%) compared with 4 of 14 laparoscopic surgery patients (28.6%) (odds ratio 0.18, 0.01-1.53). No serious adverse effects (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were observed in the sclerotherapy group; 1 patient in the surgery group had a Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication. Median hospital direct costs were significantly lower in the sclerotherapy group than those in the surgery group-266 euros versus 2189 euros. CONCLUSION: Ethanol sclerotherapy seems to be cost-effective for endometrioma and also appears to reduce complications. In this pilot study, recurrence was not higher than with conventional surgery.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/terapia , Etanol/uso terapéutico , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Ovario/terapia , Escleroterapia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Endometriosis/patología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/economía , Enfermedades del Ovario/patología , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/economía , España , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto Joven
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(40): e17183, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31577708

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare the quality of histological endometrial samples collected through Pipelle aspiration and hysteroscopic biopsies to assess the agreement between these 2 biopsies in the histological diagnosis of malignancy and to compare the costs of both biopsies.This was a cross-sectional study. Forty-five women were biopsied, first using Pipelle and immediately after using hysteroscopy. The material collected was sent for analysis, and hysteroscopy was considered the gold standard. The results were divided into the following 3 categories: normal (atrophic, proliferative, and secretory endometrium); polyps; and malignancies. We report the agreement between Pipelle and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy and compare their costs.The study showed that while analyzing endometrial malignancies, Pipelle sampling had 100% sensitivity and specificity. In the detection of polyps, Pipelle sampling showed 26.1% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, 48.5% negative predictive value, and 53.7% accuracy. Agreement with hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100%. The Pipelle device costs 27 times less than hysteroscopic biopsy for health insurance companies. This cost is 13.7 times lower in the Brazilian Unified Health System.Endometrial biopsies using the Pipelle have a high accuracy for endometrial cancer and a low accuracy for polyps. We detected 100% agreement between the reports of Pipelle and hysteroscopy with regard to malignancy. Pipelle is the most cost-effective method of endometrial biopsy.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Endometrio/patología , Histeroscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/normas , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/economía , Histeroscopía/normas , Menopausia/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
JAMA Intern Med ; 179(3): 324-332, 2019 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640382

RESUMEN

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services added lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as a Medicare preventive service benefit in 2015 following findings from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a 16% reduction in lung cancer mortality associated with LDCT. A challenge in developing and promoting a national lung cancer screening program is the high false-positive rate of LDCT because abnormal findings from thoracic imaging often trigger subsequent invasive diagnostic procedures and could lead to postprocedural complications. Objective: To determine the complication rates and downstream medical costs associated with invasive diagnostic procedures performed for identification of lung abnormalities in the community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of non-protocol-driven community practices captured in MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Medicare supplemental databases was conducted. A nationally representative sample of 344 510 patients aged 55 to 77 years who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures between 2008 and 2013 was included. Main Outcomes and Measures: One-year complication rates were calculated for 4 groups of invasive diagnostic procedures. The complication rates and costs were further stratified by age group. Results: Of the 344 510 individuals aged 55 to 77 years included in the study, 174 702 comprised the study group (109 363 [62.6%] women) and 169 808 served as the control group (106 007 [62.4%] women). The estimated complication rate was 22.2% (95% CI, 21.7%-22.7%) for individuals in the young age group and 23.8% (95% CI, 23.0%-24.6%) for those in the Medicare group; the rates were approximately twice as high as those reported in the NLST (9.8% and 8.5%, respectively). The mean incremental complication costs were $6320 (95% CI, $5863-$6777) for minor complications to $56 845 (95% CI, $47 953-$65 737) for major complications. Conclusions and Relevance: The rates of complications after invasive diagnostic procedures were higher than the rates reported in clinical trials. Physicians and patients should be aware of the potential risks of subsequent adverse events and their high downstream costs in the shared decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Broncoscopía/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/economía , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Urology ; 116: 68-75, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have the potential to accelerate the impact of prostate cancer screening recommendations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using Medicare data evaluating the rates of PSA testing and prostate biopsy among men without prostate cancer between 2011 and 2014. We assessed PSA testing and biopsy rates before and after policy implementation among patients of ACO and non-ACO-aligned physicians. To control for secular trends, difference-in-differences methods were used to determine the effects of ACO implementation. RESULTS: We identified 1.1 million eligible men without prostate cancer. From 2011 to 2014, the rates of PSA testing and biopsy declined by 22.3% and 7.0%, respectively. PSA testing declined similarly regardless of ACO participation-from 618 to 530 tests per 1000 beneficiaries among ACO-aligned physicians and from 607 to 516 tests per 1000 beneficiaries among non-ACO-aligned physicians (difference-in-differences P = .11). Whereas rates of prostate biopsy remained constant for patients of non-ACO-aligned physicians at 12 biopsies per 1000 beneficiaries, these rates increased from 11.6 to 12.5 biopsies per 1000 beneficiaries of patients of ACO-aligned physicians (difference-in-differences P = .03). CONCLUSION: PSA testing and prostate biopsy rates decreased significantly between 2011 and 2014. The rate of PSA testing was not differentially affected by ACO participation. Conversely, there was an increase in the rate of prostate biopsy among patients of ACO-aligned physicians. ACOs did not accelerate deimplementation of PSA testing for eligible Medicare beneficiaries without prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Beneficios del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía
7.
Radiologia ; 59(1): 40-46, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27865561

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost effectiveness of breast biopsy by 9G vacuum-assisted guided by vertical stereotaxy or ultrasonography in comparison with breast biopsy by 14G core-needle biopsy and surgical biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed a total of 997 biopsies (181 vacuum-assisted, 626 core, and 190 surgical biopsies). We calculated the total costs (indirect and direct) of the three types of biopsy. We did not calculate intangible costs. We measured the percentage of correct diagnoses obtained with each technique. To identify the most cost-effective option, we calculated the mean ratios for the three types of biopsies. RESULTS: Total costs were €225.09 for core biopsy, €638.90 for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and €1780.01 for surgical biopsy. The overall percentage of correct diagnoses was 91.81% for core biopsy, 94.03% for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 100% for surgical biopsy; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.3485). For microcalcifications, the percentage of correct diagnoses was 50% for core biopsy and 96.77% for vacuum-assisted biopsy (p<0.0001). For nodules, there were no significant differences among techniques. The mean cost-effectiveness ratio considering all lesions was 2.45 for core biopsy, 6.79 for vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 17.80 for surgical biopsy. CONCLUSION: Core biopsy was the dominant option for the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions in general. However, in cases with microcalcifications, the low percentage of correct diagnoses achieved by core biopsy (50%) advises against its use in this context, where vacuum-assisted biopsy would be the technique of choice because it is more cost-effective than surgical biopsy, the other technique indicated for biopsying microcalcifications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/economía , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacio , Adulto Joven
8.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 159(2): 371-375, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27943078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of fluorescein fluorescence-guided stereotactic needle biopsy has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy and to expedite operative procedure in the stereotactic needle biopsy of high-grade gliomas. We developed a device (Fluoropen) for detecting fluorescence in brain tumor tissues obtained by fluorescein fluorescence-guided stereotactic needle biopsy. METHODS: The Fluoropen is a device consisting of a light source fitted with color filters to create the required emission and visualization wavelengths. The proof-of-concept study consisted of four consecutive patients who underwent fluorescein fluorescence-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy of brain tumor. Each sample was examined for the presence of fluorescence using the Fluoropen and compared with a microscope with fluorescence visualization capability. RESULTS: A total of six samples were obtained from four stereotactic needle biopsy procedures. Four out of five samples (80%) taken from the contrast-enhancing part of the tumors were shown to be fluorescent under the microscope fitted with fluorescence module and the Fluoropen. One non-contrast enhancing lesion was non-fluorescent using both the microscope fitted with fluorescence module and the Fluoropen. The Fluoropen was shown to have 100% concordance with the microscope fitted with fluorescence module. CONCLUSIONS: The Fluoropen is a low-cost and simple standalone device for the detection of fluorescein fluorescence that can expedite stereotactic needle biopsy by providing instant confirmation of the diagnostic sample and therefore avoid the need for an intraoperative frozen section. In patients with non-contrast enhancing tumors and those who were pre-treated with dexamethasone prior to surgery, fluorescein fluorescence-guided stereotactic needle biopsy will need to be used with caution.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Fluorometría/instrumentación , Glioma/patología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/instrumentación , Equipo Quirúrgico/economía , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/instrumentación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Medios de Contraste , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Fluoresceína , Glioma/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
Br J Radiol ; 89(1065): 20160401, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27384241

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) using bilateral whole-breast ultrasonography (BWBUS) vs dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with primary breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective database search in a single institution identified 259 patients with breast cancer diagnosed from January 2011 to August 2014 who underwent mammography, BWBUS and MRI before surgery. Patient characteristics, tumour characteristics and lesions seen on each imaging modality were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each modality were calculated. ICDRs according to index tumour histology and receptor status were also evaluated. The effect of additional cancer detection on surgical planning was obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: A total of 266 additional lesions beyond 273 index malignancies were seen on at least 1 modality, of which 121 (45%) lesions were malignant and 145 (55%) lesions were benign. MRI was significantly more sensitive than BWBUS (p = 0.01), while BWBUS was significantly more accurate and specific than MRI (p < 0.0001). Compared with mammography, the ICDRs using BWBUS and MRI were significantly higher for oestrogen receptor-positive and triple-negative cancers, but not for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cancers. 22 additional malignant lesions in 18 patients were seen on MRI only. Surgical planning remained unchanged in 8 (44%) of those 18 patients. CONCLUSION: MRI was more sensitive than BWBUS, while BWBUS was more accurate and specific than MRI. MRI-detected additional malignant lesions did not change surgical planning in almost half of these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: BWBUS may be a cost-effective and practical tool in breast cancer staging.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/normas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/economía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/normas
10.
Clin Imaging ; 40(5): 1023-8, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27348058

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to describe and present outcomes of the track embolization technique with absorbable hemostat gelatin powder during percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy and/or fiducial marker placement versus the standard of care (no track embolization) in an attempt to decrease rates of pneumothorax (PTX), chest tube placement, hemorrhage and/or complications, and average cost per patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, case-control, retrospective study was performed in which 125 consecutive patients who underwent track embolization were compared with 124 consecutive controls at one institution. For subjects in whom the track embolization technique was utilized, it was performed passively through a coaxial needle as it was removed. All procedures were performed by one of three attending interventional radiologists. For each group, medical records and procedure images were reviewed for PTX occurring postprocedure, PTX requiring chest tube placement, and occurrence of minor or major complication and/or hemorrhage. Comparison was made with published complication rates, and a cost-per-patient analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: In track embolization cases versus controls, there were statistically significant reduction in PTX (8.8% vs. 21%; P=.007) and reduction in PTX requiring chest tube placement (4% vs. 8.1%; P=.195). This compares favorably to previously published rates of PTX and chest tube placement of 8%-64% and 1.6%-17%, respectively. None of the pneumothoraces occurring at time of needle placement increased in size with use of the track embolization technique. There were no major complications (including neurological sequela) in the track embolization group. In track embolization cases versus controls, there was a statistically significant reduction in both the rate of major hemorrhage (0% vs. 4%; P=.029) and average cost per patient ($262.40 vs. $352.07; P=.044). CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy and/or fiducial marker placement were safer utilizing the track embolization technique during trocar removal. In addition, this technique was cost effective in the study population.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Marcadores Fiduciales , Hemotórax/prevención & control , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Pulmón/patología , Neumotórax/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Embolización Terapéutica/economía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemotórax/economía , Hemotórax/epidemiología , Hemotórax/etiología , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumotórax/economía , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Neumotórax/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Dan Med J ; 62(7)2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183048

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most institutions perform percutaneous liver biopsy with a post-biopsy patient observation period lasting up to eight hours, which is resource-demanding. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of liver biopsy performed in a fast-track set-up with an only one-hour post-biopsy observation time. METHODS: Patients referred to our institution underwent fast-track ultrasound-guided 18-gauge Tru-Cut liver biopsy procedures. Each single biopsy procedure was followed by a post-procedure observational period of one hour and an additional focused assessment with sonography for trauma before patient discharge. All patients underwent a clinical follow-up programme at revisit in order to register any delayed onset of major complications. RESULTS: Out of 200 completed biopsy procedures, two major complications were registered post biopsy and they were treated appropriately. All patients were safely discharged from our institution. No fatality or long-term complications were found during this study. CONCLUSION: The fast-track approach reported herein is a feasible option when adequate patient information is given. Besides the obvious, positive effect on patient logistics and departmental throughput, this approach may also reduce diagnostic work-up time and bring financial benefits. Therefore, we encourage the use of this approach in institutions comparable to our own. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/instrumentación , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Hígado/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
13.
J Oncol Pract ; 11(3): e351-9, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25604594

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Image-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (IGTTNB) is an important tool in the diagnosis of patients with cancer. Common complications include pneumothorax and chest tube placement, with rates ranging from 6% to 57%. We performed a population-based study to determine patterns of use, complications, and costs associated with IGTTNB. METHODS: The Premier Perspective database was used to identify patients with cancer with ≥ one claim for IGTTNB from 2006 to 2012. Patients were stratified on the basis of inpatient versus outpatient setting. Pneumothorax was defined by a new claim within 1 month of IGTTNB; hospitalization and chest tube placement rates were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with pneumothorax. RESULTS: We Identified 79,518 patients with cancer who underwent IGTTNB: 42,955 (54.0%) outpatients and 36,563 (46.0%) inpatients. Of patients who underwent outpatient IGTTNB, 5,261 (12.2%) developed a pneumothorax. Of those, 1,006 (19.1%, 2.3% of total) were hospitalized, and 180 (3.4%, 0.42% of total) required chest tubes. Pneumothorax after outpatient IGTTNB was associated with number of comorbidities, rural site, hospital bed size of more than 600, and biopsy of parenchymal as opposed to pleural lesions. Of patients who underwent inpatient IGTTNB, 7,830 (21.4%) developed a pneumothorax, and 2,894 (36.0%, 7.9% of total) required chest tube. Over time, total IGTTNB volume increased by 40.6%, and mean outpatient cost per procedure increased by 24.4%. CONCLUSION: While pneumothorax was frequent in outpatients, rates of hospitalization and chest tube placement were low. As screening for lung cancer increases, we anticipate an increased need for IGTNBB. Patients can be reassured by the low rate of serious complications.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Biopsia con Aguja/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/tendencias , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/estadística & datos numéricos , Tubos Torácicos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumotórax/etiología , Neumotórax/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Laryngoscope ; 125(4): 919-23, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25376857

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Definitive tissue diagnosis for lesions warranting biopsy is shifting from the operating room to the office. Safety, tolerance, factors related to successful biopsy, and time to treatment are not well-defined. METHODS: Retrospective review of 116 patients undergoing in-office biopsy of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were included. Logistic regression determined if demographics, site, T-stage, or approach (transoral/transnasal) were related to success. Time to definitive treatment was also analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-two transnasal and 24 transoral biopsies were performed on 73 laryngeal, 35 oropharyngeal, and 8 hypopharyngeal lesions. Of those, 97 of 116 diagnoses were made in-office. There were no complications; two patients did not tolerate the procedure. Success was not related to age (P = 0.374), site (P = 0.527), T-stage (P = 0.587), or approach (P = 0.566). Time to treatment was 24.2 ± 13.9 days with successful office biopsy and 48.8 ± 49.4 days without. CONCLUSIONS: High procedural completion rate was observed across patients, sites, and approaches. All patients should be considered for in-office biopsy, a more time- and cost-effective option leading to earlier treatment.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Análisis de Varianza , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/cirugía , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Laringoscopía/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirugía , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
15.
Laryngoscope ; 125(4): 909-12, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25475923

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Advances in flexible endoscopy with working-channel biopsy forceps have led to excellent visualization of laryngopharyngeal lesions with capability for in-office awake biopsy. Potential benefits include prompt diagnosis without risk of general anesthesia, preoperative counseling, and avoiding an anesthetic should the lesion return benign. We evaluate the accuracy of these biopsies in order to determine their role and diagnostic value. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed from January 1, 2010, through July 31, 2013, of patients who underwent office-based current procedural terminology code 31576 and were taken to the operating room for direct microlaryngoscopy with biopsy/excision. Clinical diagnoses and pathology reports were reviewed. For statistical analysis, we considered three groups: 1) malignant and premalignant, 2) lesions of uncertain significance, and 3) benign lesions. RESULTS: In the study period, 76 patients with an office biopsy had a clinical picture to warrant direct microlaryngoscopy and biopsy/excision. Kendall's coefficient for each group indicated moderate correlation only. When groups 1 and 2 were considered together, there was a substantial and statistically significant correlation. For malignant and premalignant lesions, the office biopsy analysis was as follows: sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 87%, positive predictive value = 78%, and negative predictive value = 74%. CONCLUSION: Office biopsy may offer early direction and avoid operative intervention in some cases; however, for suspected dysplastic or malignant lesions, direct microlaryngoscopy should be the standard of care to ensure adequate full-thickness sampling and staging. For benign pathology, office biopsy is a safe and viable alternative to direct microlaryngoscopy and biopsy/excision.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia con Aguja/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Faríngeas/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Laringe/patología , Enfermedades de la Laringe/cirugía , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Laringoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Quirófanos/economía , Neoplasias Faríngeas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
16.
Intern Med J ; 44(1): 50-6, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112296

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence that direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration reduces complications, but this practice is not universal in Australia and New Zealand. AIMS: To describe the current utilisation and logistical barriers to the use of direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration by respiratory physicians from Australia and New Zealand, and to determine the cost benefits of procuring equipment and training resources in chest ultrasound. METHODS: We surveyed all adult respiratory physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand regarding their use of direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration. We performed a cost-benefit analysis for acquiring bedside ultrasound equipment and estimated the capacity of available ultrasound training. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six of 275 respiratory physicians responded (53% response). One-third (33.6%) of respondents do not undertake direct ultrasound localisation. Lack of training/expertise (44.6%) and lack of access to ultrasound equipment (41%) were the most frequently reported barriers to performing direct ultrasound localisation. An average delay of 2 or more days to obtain an ultrasound performed in radiology was reported in 42.7% of respondents. Decision-tree analysis demonstrated that clinician-performed direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration is cost-beneficial, with recovery of initial capital expenditure within 6 months. Ultrasound training infrastructure is already available to up-skill all respiratory physicians within 2 years and is cost-neutral. CONCLUSION: Many respiratory physicians have not adopted direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration because they lack equipment and expertise. However, purchase of ultrasound equipment is cost-beneficial, and there is already sufficient capacity to deliver accredited ultrasound training through existing services.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Derrame Pleural/patología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumología/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Australasia , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recolección de Datos , Árboles de Decisión , Equipo Médico Durable/economía , Equipo Médico Durable/provisión & distribución , Educación Médica Continua , Gastos en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/economía , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Práctica Profesional/clasificación , Neumología/economía , Neumología/educación , Neumología/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 10(6): 685-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24364773

RESUMEN

Proponents of the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) propose that in this era of EBUS-TBNA, training for conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) should be abandoned. The authors of this editorial provide the opposing view. C-TBNA has a short and a steep learning curve and adds to the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in a cost-effective fashion. Considering its simplicity, availability, affordability, safety, and several unique indications, C-TBNA continues to contribute to the welfare of patients worldwide. It should remain as an integral part of pulmonary fellowship training programs.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Broncoscopía/educación , Carcinoma Broncogénico/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Broncoscopía/economía , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/economía , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Humanos , Linfoma/patología , Neoplasias del Mediastino/patología , Mediastinoscopía , Sarcoidosis Pulmonar/patología
18.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 17(11): 1517-22, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23771540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic and staging approach for the mediastinal lymphadenopathies, with or whithout pulmonary lesions endoscopically visible, is based on transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) during fiberoptic bronchoscopy and on mediastinoscopy. One important factor impacting on TBNA sensitivity is the rapid on site cytological examination (ROSE). AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of TBNA and TBNA + ROSE, in the diagnosis of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 120 patients, affected by mediastinal lymphadenopathies suspected for lung cancer, underwent TBNA during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: 60 patients without ROSE (group A) and other 60 with ROSE (group B). Whenever needle aspirations failed to provide diagnosis, the patient underwent mediastinoscopy. The economic impact of the diagnostic process was performed. RESULTS: In group A, 39 patients (65%) obtained a diagnosis with TBNA while 21 patients (35%) required mediastinoscopy. In group B, 48 patients (80%) obtained a diagnosis with TBNA + ROSE, while 12 patients (20%) required mediastinoscopy. With regards to the costs of the procedures performed in the diagnostic process, the use of TBNA with ROSE as first diagnostic approach has saved a considerable amount of euros (19,413) compared to the use of TBNA without ROSE and the combined procedure increased (p < 0.02; chi square test) the sensitivity of TBNA by 15%. CONCLUSIONS: ROSE significantly impacts on the diagnostic yield, as well as on the overall management costs of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, suspected for lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Linfáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Mediastino/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Broncoscopía/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Linfáticas/patología , Masculino , Enfermedades del Mediastino/patología , Mediastinoscopía/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 19(4): 368-73, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23719295

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most efficient and cost-effective approach to pleural exudates not diagnosed by means of thoracocentesis remains uncertain. Both closed pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy may be utilized for the acquisition of pleural tissue. This review will focus on the developments in image guidance of closed pleural biopsy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest that computed tomography and ultrasound guidance improve the yield and safety of closed pleural biopsy. Imaging is best suited to reduce the rate of false-negative biopsy in malignant pleural disease by enhanced targeting of localized pleural changes typically situated dorsolaterally close to the diaphragm. Pleural tuberculosis causes effusions with discrete and uniformly distributed pleural thickening, and evidence suggests that the utilization of imaging has little advantage in this setting apart from decreasing the risk associated with blind biopsy. Imaging also facilitates a directed repeat thoracocentesis in the same session. The cumulative yield of image-assisted repeat thoracocentesis and pleural biopsy has been reported to approach that of thoracoscopy, particularly in cases with pleural thickening, nodularity or pleural-based mass lesions. SUMMARY: Image-guided pleural biopsy combined with repeat thoracocentesis is a safe, inexpensive, accessible and sensitive method for further examination of patients with pleural exudates not diagnosed by initial thoracocentesis.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Derrame Pleural/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Toracoscopía , Tuberculosis Pleural/patología , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/economía , Masculino , Pleura/diagnóstico por imagen , Pleura/patología , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico por imagen , Derrame Pleural/economía , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Intervencional/economía , Toracoscopía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Tuberculosis Pleural/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 137(4): 541-5, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23273390

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry has been extensively studied in prostate needle biopsy, but its use in routine practice and the quality assurance and associated cost have not been previously addressed. OBJECTIVE: To examine the routine use of immunohistochemistry in prostate biopsies in a tertiary academic institution. DESIGN: We reviewed reports of 748 consecutive prostate biopsies and we evaluated the turnaround times, the final diagnosis on individual specimens, the intradepartmental consultation rates, and the associated costs. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry evaluation was required for 39.4% of biopsies and 12% of blocks (average 1.8 blocks/case). The biopsies with immunohistochemistry were signed out 1.7 workdays later (8.6 versus 6.9 days). The diagnostic breakdown for individual blocks evaluated by immunohistochemistry was Cancer 47.7%; Atypical, Suspicious 10.8%; Small Atypical Glands Adjacent to High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia 6.9%; High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia 12.4%; and Benign 22.2%. Diagnoses of Cancer or Atypical, Suspicious (Atypical, Suspicious + Small Atypical Glands Adjacent to High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia) were rendered in 65.4% of individual blocks assessed by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry aided in establishing limited cancer (≤10% of core) in 69.3% of cases and in 74% of single-core-positive biopsies. Departmental consultation was performed in 18.3% of biopsies and immunohistochemistry was used in 68% of these cases. Both immunohistochemistry and consultation were performed in 55.8% of Atypical, Suspicious cases. The average immunohistochemistry cost per biopsy was $22.34 and the estimated annual cost for prostate biopsy immunohistochemistry in our laboratory was $33 420.64. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemistry is frequently used in our prostate biopsy practice to establish or confirm a limited Cancer diagnosis, to better resolve diagnostic ambiguity, or for quality assurance. The data provided herein can be used for comparisons with other prostate biopsy practices.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasia Intraepitelial Prostática/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/economía , Inmunohistoquímica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Intraepitelial Prostática/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...