Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between the Voltage- and Use-Dependent Nav1.7 Channel Blocker Vixotrigine and Carbamazepine in Healthy Volunteers.

Vixotrigine is a voltage- and use-dependent Nav1.7 channel blocker under investigation for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia. Vixotrigine is metabolized primarily via uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). Carbamazepine, a UGT and cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer, is a first-line treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center phase 1 study to investigate the impact of coadministering vixotrigine and carbamazepine on their respective pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy volunteers, the safety and tolerability of combined treatment, and PK recovery of vixotrigine following carbamazepine discontinuation. Randomly assigned treatments were carbamazepine (100 mg twice a day, days 1-3 and 200 mg twice a day, days 4-21) or placebo on days 1 to 21. All volunteers received vixotrigine 150 mg 3 times a day on days 16 to 28. At prespecified times, whole-blood samples were collected for PK assessment. Statistical analyses were performed on the log-transformed PK parameters area under the concentration-time curve within a dosing interval (AUC0-tau ) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) for vixotrigine, carbamazepine, and metabolites. Vixotrigine AUC0-tau and Cmax were reduced by 31.6% and 26.3%, respectively, when coadministered with carbamazepine compared with placebo. Seven days after carbamazepine discontinuation, vixotrigine AUC0-tau and Cmax remained 24.5% and 21.4% lower compared with placebo. Carbamazepine AUC0-tau and Cmax were <10% lower when coadministered with vixotrigine compared on days 15 and 21. Vixotrigine/carbamazepine coadministration was well tolerated. These results suggest that vixotrigine does not have an effect on carbamazepine PK, and although carbamazepine has an effect on the exposure of vixotrigine, the effect is not considered clinically relevant.

Telemetered common marmosets is useful for the assessment of electrocardiogram parameters changes induced by multiple cardiac ion channel inhibitors.

The objective of this study is to assess the response of telemetered common marmosets to multiple cardiac ion channel inhibitors and to clarify the usefulness of this animal model in evaluating the effects of drug candidates on electrocardiogram (ECG). Six multiple cardiac ion channel inhibitors (sotalol, astemizole, flecainide, quinidine, verapamil and terfenadine) were orally administered to telemetered common marmosets and changes in QTc, PR interval and QRS duration were evaluated. Drugs plasma levels were determined to compare the sensitivity in common marmosets to that in humans. QTc prolongation was observed in the marmosets dosed with sotalol, astemizole, flecainide, quinidine, verapamil and terfenadine. PR prolongation was noted after flecainide and verapamil administration, and QRS widening occurred following treatment with flecainide and quinidine. Drugs plasma levels associated with ECG changes in marmosets were similar to those in humans, except for verapamil-induced QTc prolongation. Verapamil-induced change is suggested due to body temperature decrease. These results indicate that telemetered common marmoset is a useful animal for evaluation of the ECG effects of multiple cardiac ion channel inhibitors and the influence of body temperature change should be considered in the assessment.

Caramiphen-induced block of sodium currents and spinal anesthesia.

The underlying mechanisms for the action of caramiphen used in local anesthesia are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the block of caramiphen on voltage-gated Na⁺ channels and in spinal anesthesia. We investigated the effect of caramiphen on voltage-gated sodium channels in differentiated neuronal NG108-15 cells as well as on rat motor function, proprioception, and pain behavior (when administered intrathecally). In in vitro experiments, lidocaine produced concentration- and state-dependent effects on tonic block of voltage-gated Na⁺ currents (IC50 of 66.2 and 212.9 µM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Caramiphen exhibited a milder state-dependence of block (IC50 of 52.1 and 99.5 µM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Lidocaine showed a much stronger frequency-dependence of block than caramiphen: with high frequency stimulation (3.33 Hz), 50 µM caramiphen elicited an additional 20% blockade, whereas the same concentration of lidocaine produced 50% more block. In in vivo experiments, caramiphen with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade was more potent than lidocaine (P<0.05) in spinal anesthesia. On an equipotent basis (25% effective dose (ED25), ED50, and ED75), the duration of caramiphen at producing spinal anesthesia was longer than that of lidocaine (P<0.01). Our data revealed that caramiphen had a more potent, prolonged spinal blockade with a more sensory/nociceptive-selective action over motor blockade in comparison with lidocaine. Spinal anesthesia with caramiphen could be through the suppression of voltage-gated Na⁺ currents.

A case series of patients with lamotrigine toxicity at one center from 2003 to 2012.

INTRODUCTION: Lamotrigine is a phenyltriazine compound that inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels, decreasing release of glutamate and aspartate, and inhibits serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake. Reports of toxicity in the literature are limited to case reports and primarily involve coingestants. This case series is intended to report the clinical manifestations of lamotrigine toxicity. METHODS: This retrospective case series from 2003 to 2012 studies the effects of lamotrigine toxicity when not confounded by coingestants. Admission records at an inpatient toxicology center were reviewed for lamotrigine-only exposure based on history with supporting laboratory data when available. After identification, these charts were reviewed again to characterize vital signs, neurological examination findings, specific laboratory and electrocardiography parameters, and complications. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were identified with possible lamotrigine toxicity. Nine patients, including three toddlers, had lamotrigine-only ingestions. Three of these patients had seizures, four were hypertensive, five were tachycardic, and four experienced tachypnea. Mental status was altered in all nine (depressed (n = 4), agitated (n = 5) or both (n = 3)). Five patients were hyperreflexic and experienced intermittent myoclonus, and two had inducible clonus. On electrocardiogram, two patients experienced QRS prolongation (114-116 ms), and four had QTc prolongation (463-586 ms). No patient had life-threatening symptoms or signs. Serum levels of lamotrigine were available in seven patients, and averaged 35.4 mg/L (17-90 mg/L). The therapeutic range for sLTG is 3-14 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine toxicity manifested with minor-moderate neurologic and/or electrocardiographic effects. Toxicity reflects the known pharmacologic actions of lamotrigine: serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibition, and sodium channel blockade.

Effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the pharmacokinetics of a combined ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel oral contraceptive in healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of once-daily (QD) eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 800 mg and 1,200 mg administration on pharmacokinetics of a combined ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel oral contraceptive (OC) in women of childbearing potential. METHODS: Two two-way, crossover, two-period, randomized, open-label studies were performed in 20 healthy female subjects, each. In one period (ESL+OC period), subjects received ESL 800 mg QD in one study and ESL 1200 mg QD in the other study, for 15 days; concomitantly with the Day 14 ESL dose, an oral single dose of 30 µg ethinylestradiol and 150 µg levonorgestrel was administered. In the other period (OC alone), a single dose of 30 µg ethinylestradiol and 150 µg levonorgestrel was administered. Three weeks or more separated the periods. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between pharmacokinetic parameters of 30 µg ethinylestradiol and 150 µg levonorgestrel following ESL+OC and OC alone, and 90% confidence intervals (90%CI) for the ESL+OC/OC alone geometric mean ratio (GMR) were calculated. RESULTS: ESL significantly decreased the systemic exposure to both ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. GMR (90%CI) for AUC0-24 of ethinylestradiol were 68% (64%; 71%) following 1,200 mg ESL and 75% (71%; 79%) following 800 mg ESL. GMR (90%CI) for AUC0-24 of levonorgestrel were 76% (68%; 86%) following 1,200 mg ESL and 89% (82%; 97%) following 800 mg ESL. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant dose-dependent effect of ESL administration on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel was observed. Therefore, to avoid inadvertent pregnancy, women of childbearing potential should use other adequate methods of contraception during treatment with ESL, and, in case ESL treatment is discontinued, until CYP3A4 activity returns to normal.