Administration of Low-dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in the Setting of Outpatient Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: With the rise of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), rapid motor and sensory recovery after anesthesia is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia (SA) for patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: Data were reviewed from a single ASC from 2018 to 2020 for two arthroplasty-trained surgeons for all patients with primary arthroplasties that had administration of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. Data collected from the ASC records were then further evaluated for total spinal block time, length of blockade, time to discharge criteria, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and time to discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients undergoing 244 primary arthroplasties received SA with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The volume of 0.75% bupivacaine varied: 115 patients received 0.8 mL (6 mg), 111 patients received 1.0 mL (7.5 mg), and 17 patients received 1.2 mL (9 mg). Total SA time averaged 144 minutes with a mean of 30 minutes from post anesthesia care unit arrival to motor recovery. The mean time from post anesthesia care unit arrival to discharge criteria was 89 minutes. The average VAS at discharge was 1.44; the average VAS on POD1 was 3.0. No episodes of urinary retention and no reports of transient neurologic symptoms were noted in the study population. CONCLUSION: Low-dose, single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine SA is an effective option in the ASC for arthroplasty, providing a fast return of motor function, facilitating rapid discharge, and is safe with a relatively low-risk profile.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia combined with total intravenous anesthesia during oncological colon surgery in a 23-hour stay enhanced recovery protocol: A non-randomized study.

After the success of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative care has been further optimized in accelerated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), where optimal pain management is crucial. Spinal anesthesia was introduced as adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain and facilitate mobility. This study aimed to determine which spinal anesthetic agent provides best pain relief in accelerated ERP for colon carcinoma. This single center study was a secondary analysis conducted among patients included in the aCcelerated 23-Hour erAS care for colon surgEry study who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery. The first 30 patients included received total intravenous anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, the 30 patients subsequently included received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Primary endpoint of this study was the total amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were amounts of MMEs administered in the recovery room and surgical ward, pain score using the numeric rating scale, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Compared to prilocaine, the total amount of MMEs administered was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group (n = 60, 16.3 vs 6.3, P = .049). Also, the amount of MMEs administered and median pain scores were significantly lower after intrathecal bupivacaine in the recovery room (MMEs 11.0 vs 0.0, P = .012 and numeric rating scale 2.0 vs 1.5, P = .004). On the surgical ward, median MMEs administered, and pain scores were comparable. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine was associated with less opioid use and better pain reduction immediately after surgery compared to prilocaine within an accelerated ERP for elective, oncological colon surgery.

Ultrasound-Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Feasible Option for Pain Management During Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Report.

Inability to remain motionless owing to pain during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may increase the need for sedation and analgesia. Here, we present a case where ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was used successfully for pain management during an MRI in a patient suffering from severe sacral pain. Sacral ESPB was performed with a total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of the intermediate sacral crest. The patient achieved sensory block in the L5-S4 dermatomes without motor block, resulting in complete pain relief. This case report highlights the feasibility of ultrasound-guided sacral ESPB as a potential pain management technique.

Perioperative analgesic effects of the erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine or bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To compare the perioperative opioid requirements among dogs receiving an erector spinae plane (ESP) block with bupivacaine, with or without dexmedetomidine, and a control group. Animals and procedure: Thirty client-owned, healthy adult dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy were included in this randomized, prospective, blinded clinical study. Dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: Group B, ESP block with bupivacaine; Group BD, ESP block with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine; and Group C, control. Rescue intra- and postoperative analgesia consisted of fentanyl and methadone, respectively. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the short form of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF). Results: In Group BD, 0/10 dogs required intraoperative fentanyl, compared to 9/10 in Group C (P < 0.001), whereas 1/10 required postoperative methadone, compared to 9/10 in Group B (P = 0.003) and 10/10 in Group C (P < 0.001). The total amount of intraoperative fentanyl (µg/kg) was 0 (0 to 4) in Group B and 0 (0 to 0) in BD, compared to 6 (0 to 8) in C (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative methadone (mg/kg) required during the first 12 h was 0.5 (0 to 1.4) in Group B (P = 0.003) and 0 (0 to 0) in BD (P < 0.001), compared to C (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: An ESP block with bupivacaine, with or without dexmedetomidine, was associated with a reduction in perioperative opioid consumption and provided effective acute pain control.

Effets analgésiques périopératoires du bloc des érecteurs du rachis avec de la bupivacaïne ou de la bupivacaïne-dexmédétomidine chez les chiens subissant une hémilaminectomie: un essai contrôlé randomisé. Objectif: Comparer les besoins périopératoires en opioïdes chez les chiens recevant un bloc des érecteurs de la colonne vertébrale (ESP) avec de la bupivacaïne, avec ou sans dexmédétomidine, et un groupe témoin. Animaux et procédure: Trente chiens adultes en bonne santé appartenant à des clients subissant une hémilaminectomie ont été inclus dans cette étude clinique randomisée, prospective et en aveugle. Les chiens ont été répartis au hasard dans 1 des 3 groupes de traitement: groupe B, bloc ESP avec bupivacaïne; groupe BD, bloc ESP avec bupivacaïne et dexmédétomidine; et groupe C, témoin. L'analgésie de secours peropératoire et postopératoire consistait respectivement en fentanyl et en méthadone. La douleur postopératoire a été évaluée à l'aide du formulaire abrégé de l'échelle de mesure de la douleur de Glasgow (CMPS-SF). Résultats: Dans le groupe BD, 0/10 chiens ont eu besoin de fentanyl peropératoire, contre 9/10 dans le groupe C (P < 0,001), tandis que 1/10 ont eu besoin de méthadone postopératoire, contre 9/10 dans le groupe B (P = 0,003) et 10/10 dans le groupe C (P < 0,001). La quantité totale de fentanyl peropératoire (µg/kg) était de 0 (0 à 4) dans le groupe B et de 0 (0 à 0) dans le groupe BD, contre 6 (0 à 8) dans le groupe C (P = 0,004 et P < 0,001, respectivement). La méthadone postopératoire (mg/kg) nécessaire au cours des 12 premières heures était de 0,5 (0 à 1,4) dans le groupe B (P = 0,003) et de 0 (0 à 0) dans le groupe BD (P < 0,001), par rapport au groupe C (P = 0,003). et P < 0,001, respectivement). Conclusion: Un bloc ESP avec de la bupivacaïne, avec ou sans dexmédétomidine, a été associé à une réduction de la consommation peropératoire d'opioïdes et a permis un contrôle efficace de la douleur aiguë.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Effect of pre-incisional and peritoneal local anesthetics administration on colon anastomosis and wound healing.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that levobupivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine but carries a lower risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. This study explores whether levobupivacaine and bupivacaine are preferable for all patients, includ-ing those with comorbidities, particularly focusing on their effects on colonic anastomosis. The primary objective is to examine the influence of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on colonic anastomosis. Additionally, the study will assess their impact on wound healing and their anti-adhesive properties. METHODS: Conducted between July 28, 2022, to August 4, 2022, at the Hamidiye Animal Experiments Laboratory, this study was approved by the University Science Health, Hamidiye Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee. This study was conducted using 21 male Sprague rats aged 16-20 weeks. The rats were allocated into three equal groups of seven each: Group C: pre-incisional isotonic; Group B: pre-incisional bupivacaine; and Group L: pre-incisional levobupivacaine. Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) were recorded during laparotomy and tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline levels measurement. Wound tensile strength along the middle incision line and anastomotic burst pressure were also assessed. RESULTS: MAS was statistically significantly lower in Groups B and L compared to Group C (p<0.001). The wound histopathology score (WHS) was significantly higher in Group L than in Group B (p=0.021). Colon histopathology scores (CHSs) were also signifi-cantly higher in Group L compared to Group C (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: TThe study found that bupivacaine and levobupivacaine did not significantly enhance wound healing, although le-vobupivacaine significantly improved WHS relative to bupivacaine. According to the findings of this study, levobupivacaine can enhance clinical practice by being used in patients undergoing colon anastomosis. It contributes significantly to the durability of colon anasto-mosis, has a more positive effect on wound healing compared to bupivacaine, and exhibits anti-adhesive properties. Additional clinical trials are necessary to validate these results further.

The Median Effective Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Cesarean Section at Moderately High-Altitude.

Objective: Alterations in altitude can lead to an augmented requirement for local anesthesia among patients. Nevertheless, the necessity for an elevated dosage of local anesthetic for parturients at moderately high altitudes during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section remains uninvestigated. This up-down sequential study endeavors to determine the ED50 dose of bupivacaine required for spinal anesthesia during cesarean sections at moderately high-altitude. Methods: Thirty singleton parturients at moderately high altitude underwent elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The up-and-down sequential method was employed, starting with an initial dose of 12mg (1.6mL) of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine for the first participant. The dose for the next case was adjusted up or down by 0.75mg based on the effectiveness of the previous participant. Effectiveness was defined as the bilateral sensory block reaching T6 within 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia injection, without the need for additional epidural anesthesia before fetal delivery. The ED50 dose and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the Dixon sequential method and isotonic regression, respectively. The incidence of maternal hypotension, nausea, and vomiting during the study period was also recorded. Results: The ED50 of hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section was calculated as 8.23 mg (95% CI, 6.52-9.32 mg) using the Dixon up-and-down method. Further validation using isotonic regression yielded a value of 8.39 mg (95% CI, 7.48-9.30 mg), confirming the accuracy and sensitivity of the conclusion. During the operation, only 6 parturients experienced hypotension, and no adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and shivering were observed. Conclusion: The ED50 dose of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section at moderately high altitude is 8.23 mg, which exceeds the ED50 dose typically required by parturients at low altitude. Comprehensive investigations are warranted to ascertain the ED90 or ED95 dose of local anesthetics for cesarean section at moderately high altitudes, thereby offering enhanced guidance for clinical practice.

Regional analgesia using ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block versus cervical erector spinae block for anterior cervical spine surgery: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia techniques are crucial for pain management after cervical spine surgeries. Anesthesiologists strive to select the most effective and least hazardous regional analgesia technique for the cervical region. Our hypothesis is that an intermediate cervical plexus (IC) block can provide adequate postoperative analgesia compared to a cervical erector spinae (ES) block in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind prospective trial, 58 patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups prior to the administration of general anesthesia. Patients in the IC group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral intermediate cervical plexus block with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% administered to each side. The ES group (n = 29) underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral cervical erector spinae plane blocks with 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine administered to each side at the C6 level. The primary outcome was to record the time to the first call for rescue analgesia (nalbuphine), and the secondary outcomes were to measure the performance time, the onset of the sensory block, the intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain intensity using VAS, the postoperative total nalbuphine consumption, and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia. RESULTS: The performance and onset of sensory block times were significantly shorter in the IC group compared to the ES group. The time to first call for nalbuphine was significantly shorter in the IC group (7.31 ± 1.34 h) compared to the ES group (11.10 ± 1.82 h). The mean postoperative VAS scores were comparable between the two groups at the measured time points, except at 8 h, where it was significantly higher in the IC group, and at 12 h, where it was significantly higher in the ES group. The total nalbuphine consumption was significantly higher in the IC group (33.1 ± 10.13 mg) compared to the ES group (22.76 ± 8.62 mg). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery, the intermediate cervical plexus block does not provide better postoperative regional analgesia compared to the cervical erector spinae block. Performance time and onset time were shorter in the IC group, whereas nalbuphine consumption was lower in the ES group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT05577559, and the date of registration: 13-10-2022).

Blood bupivacaine concentrations after pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane injections of plain and liposomal bupivacaine in robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery: Sub-study of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the timing of peak blood concentrations and potential toxicity when using a combination of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic analysis. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: Eighteen adult patients undergoing robotically-assisted mitral valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided pecto-serratus and serratus anterior plane blocks using a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl up to 2.5 mg/kg and liposomal bupivacaine up to 266 mg. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial plasma bupivacaine concentration. MAIN RESULTS: Samples from 13 participants were analyzed. There was substantial inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations. A geometric mean maximum bupivacaine concentration was 1492 ng/ml (range 660 to 4650 ng/ml) at median time of 30 min after injection. In 4/13 (31%) patients, plasma bupivacaine concentrations exceeded our predefined 2000 ng/ml toxic threshold. A second much smaller peak was observed about 32 h after the injection. No obvious signs of local anesthetic toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined injection of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for pecto-serratus/serratus anterior plane blocks produced a biphasic pattern, with the highest arterial plasma concentrations observed within 30 min. Maximum concentrations exceeded the potential toxic threshold in nearly a third of patients, but without clinical evidence of toxicity. Clinicians should not assume that routine combinations of plain and liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic fascial plane blocks are inherently safe.

Erector spinae plane block did not improve postoperative pain-related outcomes and recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery : a randomised controlled double-blinded multi-center trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is a sizable niche for a minimally invasive analgesic technique that could facilitate ambulatory video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Our study aimed to determine the analgesic potential of a single-shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block for VATS. The primary objective was the total hydromorphone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) 24 h after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study with patients scheduled for VATS in two major university-affiliated hospital centres. We randomized 52 patients into two groups: a single-shot ESP block using bupivacaine or an ESP block with normal saline (control). We administered a preoperative and postoperative (24 h) quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire and assessed postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) score. We evaluated the total standardized intraoperative fentanyl administration, total postoperative hydromorphone consumption (PCA; primary endpoint), and the incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary objective, hydromorphone consumption at 24 h (7.6 (4.4) mg for the Bupivacaine group versus 8.1 (4.2) mg for the Control group). Secondary objectives and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups at any time during the first 24 h following surgery. CONCLUSION: Our multi-centre randomized, controlled, double-blinded study found no advantage of an ESP block over placebo for VATS for opioid consumption, pain, or QoR-15 scores. Further studies are ongoing to establish the benefits of using a denser block (single-shot paravertebral with a continuous ESP block), which may provide a better quality of analgesia.

Ultrasound-guided and 'blind' sciatic nerve injection techniques: Comparison in rat cadavers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rate and extent of sciatic nerve staining with a bupivacaine-dye solution using two injection techniques: 'blind' or ultrasound-guided approach. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, experimental, randomized, cadaveric study. ANIMALS: Adult female Wistar rat cadavers [n = 24, mass 352 g (323-374)]. METHODS: Each sciatic nerve was randomly allocated to one of two groups: 'blind' (group B) or ultrasound-guided approach (group US) to injection. Following injection of bupivacaine-dye solution (0.1 mL), gross anatomical dissection was performed to visualize nerve staining, categorizing it as either positive or negative. The length of nerve staining was then measured and visual inspection conducted to identify potential nerve damage. Fisher's exact test was used to compare positive or negative nerve staining, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test used to compare the length of nerve staining between groups. RESULTS: In group B, the bupivacaine-dye solution stained 16/24 sciatic nerves (67% success). In group US, staining was successfully observed in all 24 nerves (100% success, p < 0.004). The length of nerve staining [median (interquartile range)] was 2 (2-3) mm in group B and 5 (4-6) mm in group US (p < 0.001). One sciatic nerve in group B had injectate distributed over 16 mm, suggestive of an intraneural injection. No signs of laceration or nerve damage were visible under 6× magnification in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ultrasound-guided approach for sciatic nerve injection demonstrated a higher success rate with superior injectate distribution when compared with the 'blind' approach. Ultrasound guidance is recommended over a 'blind' approach for sciatic nerve block in rats when possible.

Fluoroscopic Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae (ESP) Field Blocks: A New Technique and Radiographic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar Erector Spinae (ESP) field blocks have become a common postoperative treatment for surgical pain. The use of long-acting medications like liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) has become a major component of multimodal postsurgical pain control. Traditionally ESP injections have been performed using ultrasound (U/S) guidance by an anesthesiologist. Spine surgeons have begun to utilize these liposomal injections in their procedures for postoperative pain management. Our study describes a fluoroscopic guided ESP field block technique which provides reproducible muscular coverage and pain control for spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing single level lumbar fusion were treated preoperatively with bilateral fluoroscopically-guided lumbar erector spinae ESP field blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. We looked at 2 different injection locations involving the ESP or multifidus muscle fascial planes. The injections contained Iohexal, which was used to evaluate the coverage area of the injection. The levels of coverage were recorded, and postoperative pain control was measured immediately, postoperatively, and at 24 hours. RESULTS: Fluoroscopic field blocks at the L3-4 level were found to provide at least 4 levels of vertebral coverage rostral-caudally in both ESP and MF fascial planes. Pain was well controlled in both injection sites. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-administered fluoroscopic-guided ESP field blocks provided a reliable and consistent pattern of coverage with good postoperative pain control. This technique can be easily adopted by spine surgeons.

Comparación entre dosis bajas de bupivacaína y prilocaína en cirugía perianal ambulatoria / Comparison between low doses of bupivacaine and prilocaine in ambulatory perianal surgery

La cirugía perianal ambulatoria se caracteriza por necesitar un plano anestésico profundo durante un periodo de tiempo corto. El bloqueo subaracnoideo en silla de montar consigue una anestesia sensitiva intensa sin apenas bloqueo motor asociado. Los anestésicos locales de larga duración, como la bupivacaína, permiten en dosis bajas la realización del procedimiento y el alta hospitalaria en un tiempo acorde con la dinámica de la unidad cirugía mayor ambulatoria (UCMA). La prilocaína es un anestésico local de vida media intermedia que se caracteriza por su bajo riesgo de síntomas neurológicos transitorios y que se puede usar a dosis de 10 mg en anestesia espinal en silla de montar para la realización de cirugía perianal de menos de 45 min de duración. La hipótesis planteada es que la prilocaína, al ser un anestésico de vida media más corta que la bupivacaína, proporciona un bloqueo suficiente para la realización de un procedimiento estándar de cirugía anorrectal, acortando la estancia en la UCMA. Este estudio prospectivo, a doble ciego de 100 pacientes ASA I-III, divididos en 2 grupos aleatorios: Grupo P (10 mg de prilocaína hiperbárica 20 % + 10 μg de fentanilo) y grupo B (2,5 mg bupivacaina hiperbárica 0,5 % + 10 μg de fentanilo), donde medimos como objetivo principal el tiempo desde la realización de la técnica anestésica hasta el alta hospitalaria. Y como secundarios: el éxito del bloqueo, el tiempo desde el final de la cirugía hasta el alta hospitalaria, el tiempo de regresión del bloqueo sensitivo/motor, el tiempo hasta deambulación, la retención de orina y los efectos adversos.(AU)

Ambulatory perianal surgery is characterized by the need for a deep anesthetic plane for a short period of time. The subarachnoid saddle block achieves intense sensory anesthesia with almost no associated motor blockade. Long-acting local anesthetics, such as bupivacaine, allow the procedure to be performed at low doses and discharge from the hospital in a time that is consistent with the dynamics of the major outpatient surgery unit (MOSU). Prilocaine is a local anesthetic with an intermediate half-life that is characterized by its low risk of transient neurological symptoms and can be used at a dose of 10 mg in saddle spinal anesthesia for perianal surgery of less than 45 min duration. The hypothesis put forward is that prilocaine, being a shorter half-life anesthetic than bupivacaine, provides sufficient blockade for the performance of a standard anorectal surgery procedure, shortening the stay in the AMCU. This prospective, double-blind study of 100 ASA I-III patients, divided into 2 randomized groups: group P (10 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 20 % + 10 μg of fentanyl) and group B (2.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % + 10 μg of fentanyl), where we measured as primary objective the time from the performance ofthe anesthetic technique to hospital discharge. And as secondary objectives: success of the block, time from the end of surgery to hospital discharge, time of regression of the sensory/motor block, time to ambulation, urine retention and adverse effects.(AU)

Freeze-drying of bupivacaine lipospheres: preparation, characterization, and evaluation of anti-microbial properties.

PURPOSE: To prepare freeze-dried bupivacaine lipospheres intended for topical application in burn injuries. The aim was improving the storage stability and developing a prolonged release pattern to tackle the adverse reactions resulting from the frequent administration of bupivacaine. METHODS: The lipospheres were prepared by hot-melt dispersion method employing bupivacaine base at 1.5 and 3%w/w, tristearin 6% w/w as the core while dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and soy phosphatidylcholine (SPC) as the coat at 0.75, 1.5 and 3% w/w. The lotion was then freeze-dried and cryoprotected by sucrose 3% w/w. Evaluation was carried out through loading and release analysis, storage study, particle characterization including morphology, zeta potential and particle size as well as anti-microbial assessment. RESULTS: The highest loading, (87.6 ± 0.1%), was achieved using bupivacaine 3% and SPC 0.75%. After 6 months of storage at 4 ͦC, the loading in the lotion and the freeze-dried samples were 17.4 ± 0.2 and 87.2 ± 0.3%, respectively. In vitro dissolution test demonstrated 94.5% and 95% of bupivacaine release from lotion and freeze-dried samples, after 24 h. The respective zeta potential of -1.30 and 26 mV was recorded for lotion and solid-state bupivacaine. Micromeritic evaluation of freeze-dried powder exhibited particle size of 35.23 ± 2.02 µm and highly-wrinkled-irregular morphology without detectable needle structures related to drug free crystals. The powder had rapid reconstitution property and antibacterial activity. CONCLUSION: Freeze- drying holds a promising potential to improve the storage stability of bupivacaine lipospheres with well- preserved release pattern and particle properties for further topical application.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce the Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Poorly controlled postoperative pain results in prolonged length of stay (LOS). The use of liposome bupivacaine injectable suspension (LB) for postoperative pain control is a relatively recent practice. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the following. In patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture(s), does the use of LB reduce LOS compared with regular bupivacaine? STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: We implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with mandibular fracture(s) presented to Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, from January 2021 to January 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with 1 or more isolated mandibular fracture(s) and treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. We excluded patients with non-isolated mandibular fracture(s), isolated condyle, infected, previously treated fractures, and documented allergy to amide local anesthetics and/or its preservatives. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Primary predictor variable was local anesthetic (regular bupivacaine alone or LB/regular bupivacaine). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): Primary outcome variable was LOS, defined as the number of days from surgical procedure until discharge. Secondary outcome variables were number of opioid prescription refill(s) and postoperative pain at discharge, determined with visual analogue scale. COVARIATES: The covariates were Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking, alcohol exposure, illicit drug use, etiology, location, laterality, number of fracture(s), surgical approach, and method of maxillomandibular fixation. ANALYSES: Univariate and bivariate analyses were calculated. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS: Sixty-two subjects met the inclusion criteria (31 subjects in each group). The mean ages in LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 33.3 (±12) and 35.1 (±15.6), respectively (P = .94), the mean LOS in days was 0.23 (±0.44) in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1.48 (±1.77) in regular bupivacaine alone (P= < .001), and the mean VAS pain scores for LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 0.53 (±1.07) and 1.87 (±2.66), respectively (P = .02). Mean number of opioid prescription refill(s) was 0 in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1 in regular bupivacaine alone group, respectively (P = .01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The use of LB/regular bupivacaine for mandibular fracture(s) results in decrease in LOS and number of opioid refills compared to regular bupivacaine alone.

A comparison of the motor effects and analgesic efficacy following lumbar plexus block combined with sciatic nerve block or epidural in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare motor effects and analgesic efficacy following an ultrasound-guided lateral approach to lumbar plexus blockade at L7 and sciatic nerve blockade (LPSNB) against epidural injection in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 27 healthy adult dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO surgery. METHODS: Dogs were allocated to either LPSNB (bupivacaine 2 mg kg-1, 0.75%) or epidural (morphine PF 0.1 mg kg-1 and bupivacaine 0.5 mg kg-1, 0.75%). Other aspects of clinical management were identical, including anesthetic drug protocol, area of presurgical clipping and bladder care. Time to perform the block, response to surgical stimuli, pain scores, rescue analgesia, time to stand and walk, motor score and time to first urination were recorded. One evaluator, unaware of treatment status, performed all evaluations. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Median (range) times to stand and walk were shorter for LPSNB [60 (40-120) minutes and 90 (60-150) minutes, respectively, p = 0.003] than for epidural [150 (120-240) minutes and 180 (120-360) minutes, respectively, p = 0.006]. Four dogs required rescue intraoperatively (three in epidural group, one in LPSNB group, p = 0.438). Pain scores over the 24 hour evaluation period were similar, and not significantly different, for each group. Time to spontaneous urination [LPSNB, 330 (240-360) minutes; epidural, 300 (120-1440) minutes, p = 1.0] did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An ultrasound-guided lateral paravertebral approach to the lumbar plexus within the psoas compartment at L7, combined with sciatic nerve blockade, allows faster return to normal motor function, with similar pain control and impact on urination when compared with epidural in dogs after TPLO surgery.

Effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl as additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl as additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine in providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. INTRODUCTION: Pain following cesarean section remains a challenge, with limited treatment options due to potential undesirable parturient and neonatal side effects. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine has emerged as a favorable alternative to opioid additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine in prolonging postoperative analgesia, but its effectiveness requires further investigation. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will evaluate studies of patients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia where dexmedetomidine and fentanyl were compared as intrathecal additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. This review will consider randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies for inclusion. No limits regarding publication date or language will be applied. METHODS: A preliminary search of PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials has been conducted to identify relevant index terms and keywords, which will be applied in a second search across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase. Google Scholar, National Library of Medicine (Clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform will be searched to identify unpublished literature. Full-text studies will be subjected to an assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. The results will be presented in both tabular and narrative format and, where possible, pooled into a meta-analysis. A Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings will be created to grade the certainty of evidence of the reported outcomes. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022364815.

Estudio in vitro de elución de anestésicos locales en cemento óseo de PMMA / In vitro elution of local anesthetics from PMMA bone cement

Antecedentes y objetivo:Actualmente, no disponemos de un gold standard para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio tras una artroplastia total de rodilla, dado que se pueden administrar analgésicos a través de diferentes vías y ninguna de estas está exenta de riesgos. El sistema ideal de administración de analgésicos debería proporcionar dosis terapéuticas, no tóxicas, en el sitio quirúrgico, especialmente durante las primeras 72h. El cemento óseo utilizado en las artroplastias se ha usado como un medio de liberación de fármacos, especialmente antibióticos, desde 1970. Basado en este principio, se desarrolló este estudio con el objetivo de conocer el perfil de elución de dos anestésicos locales (hidrocloruro de lidocaína e hidrocloruro de bupivacaína) desde el cemento óseo de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA). Material y métodos: Se obtuvieron especímenes de cemento óseo Palacos® R+G e hidrocloruro de lidocaína o hidrocloruro de bupivacaína según el grupo de estudio. Estos especímenes se sumergieron en PBS (por sus siglas en inglés de phosphate buffered saline) y se retiraron de la solución en diferentes cortes temporales establecidos. Posteriormente, se analizó la concentración de anestésico local en el líquido mediante cromatografía líquida. Resultados: El porcentaje de lidocaína eludida del cemento óseo PMMA de este estudio ha sido del 9,74% del contenido total de lidocaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 18,73% a las 336h (14 días). En el caso de la bupivacaína, el porcentaje de elución ha sido del 2,71% del contenido total de bupivacaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 2,70% a las 336h (14 días). Conclusiones: Los anestésicos locales eluyen in vitro desde el cemento óseo, alcanzando a las 72h dosis cercanas a las dosis utilizadas en bloqueos anestésicos.(AU)

Background and aim: Currently, we do not have a gold standard for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. We may use one of more drug delivery systems, none of which are ideal. An ideal depot delivery system would provide therapeutic, nontoxic, doses of drug at the surgical side, especially during 72h postoperatively. The bone cement used in arthroplasties has been used as a drug delivery system, especially antibiotics, since 1970. Based on this principle, we developed this study with the aim to characterize the elution profile of two local anesthetics (lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride) from PMMA (polymethilmethacrylate) bone cement. Material and methods: Palacos® R+G bone cement and lidocaine hydrochloride or bupivacaine hydrochloride specimens were obtained depending on the study group. These specimens were immersed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and removed from the solution at different set times. Subsequently, the concentration of local anesthetic in the liquid was analyzed by liquid chromatography. Results: The percentage of lidocaine eluted from PMMA bone cement in this study was 9.74% of the total lidocaine content per specimen at 72h and 18.73% at 336h (14 days). In case of bupivacaine, the elution percentage was 2.71% of the total bupivacaine content per specimen at 72h and 2.70% at 336h (14 days). Conclusions: Local anesthetics elute in vitro from PMMA bone cement, reaching doses at 72h close to the doses used in anesthetic blocks.(AU)

[Translated article] In vitro elution of local anaesthetics from PMMA bone cement / Estudio in vitro de elución de anestésicos locales en cemento óseo de PMMA

Antecedentes y objetivo:Actualmente, no disponemos de un gold standard para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio tras una artroplastia total de rodilla, dado que se pueden administrar analgésicos a través de diferentes vías y ninguna de estas está exenta de riesgos. El sistema ideal de administración de analgésicos debería proporcionar dosis terapéuticas, no tóxicas, en el sitio quirúrgico, especialmente durante las primeras 72h. El cemento óseo utilizado en las artroplastias se ha usado como un medio de liberación de fármacos, especialmente antibióticos, desde 1970. Basado en este principio, se desarrolló este estudio con el objetivo de conocer el perfil de elución de dos anestésicos locales (hidrocloruro de lidocaína e hidrocloruro de bupivacaína) desde el cemento óseo de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA). Material y métodos: Se obtuvieron especímenes de cemento óseo Palacos® R+G e hidrocloruro de lidocaína o hidrocloruro de bupivacaína según el grupo de estudio. Estos especímenes se sumergieron en PBS (por sus siglas en inglés de phosphate buffered saline) y se retiraron de la solución en diferentes cortes temporales establecidos. Posteriormente, se analizó la concentración de anestésico local en el líquido mediante cromatografía líquida. Resultados: El porcentaje de lidocaína eludida del cemento óseo PMMA de este estudio ha sido del 9,74% del contenido total de lidocaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 18,73% a las 336h (14 días). En el caso de la bupivacaína, el porcentaje de elución ha sido del 2,71% del contenido total de bupivacaína por espécimen a las 72h y del 2,70% a las 336h (14 días). Conclusiones: Los anestésicos locales eluyen in vitro desde el cemento óseo, alcanzando a las 72h dosis cercanas a las dosis utilizadas en bloqueos anestésicos.(AU)

Background and aim: Currently, we do not have a gold standard for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. We may use one of more drug delivery systems, none of which are ideal. An ideal depot delivery system would provide therapeutic, nontoxic, doses of drug at the surgical side, especially during 72h postoperatively. The bone cement used in arthroplasties has been used as a drug delivery system, especially antibiotics, since 1970. Based on this principle, we developed this study with the aim to characterize the elution profile of two local anesthetics (lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride) from PMMA (polymethilmethacrylate) bone cement. Material and methods: Palacos® R+G bone cement and lidocaine hydrochloride or bupivacaine hydrochloride specimens were obtained depending on the study group. These specimens were immersed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and removed from the solution at different set times. Subsequently, the concentration of local anesthetic in the liquid was analyzed by liquid chromatography. Results: The percentage of lidocaine eluted from PMMA bone cement in this study was 9.74% of the total lidocaine content per specimen at 72h and 18.73% at 336h (14 days). In case of bupivacaine, the elution percentage was 2.71% of the total bupivacaine content per specimen at 72h and 2.70% at 336h (14 days). Conclusions: Local anesthetics elute in vitro from PMMA bone cement, reaching doses at 72h close to the doses used in anesthetic blocks.(AU)