Development and validation of a flexible DNA extraction (PAN) method for liquid biopsy of multiple sample types.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy is gaining increasing popularity in cancer screening and diagnosis. However, there is no relatively mature DNA isolation method or commercial kit available that is compatible with different LB sample types. This study developed a PAN-sample DNA isolation method (PAN method) for liquid biopsy samples. METHODS: The PAN method has two key steps, including biosample-specific pretreatments for various LB sample types and high concentration guanidine thiocyanate buffer for lysis and denaturation procedure. Subsequently, the performance of PAN method was validated by a series of molecular analyses. RESULTS: The PAN method was used to isolate DNA from multiple sample types related to LB, including plasma, serum, saliva, nasopharyngeal swab, and stool. All purified DNA products showed good quality and high quantity. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis using DNA purified using PAN method versus QIAamp methods showed similar efficiency. Epstein-Barr virus DNA was detected via Q-PCR using DNA purified from serum, plasma, nasopharyngeal swab, and saliva samples collected from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Similarly, methylation sequencing of swab and saliva samples revealed good coverage of target region and high methylation of HLA-DPB1 gene. Finally, 16S rDNA gene sequencing of saliva, swab, and stool samples successfully defines the relative abundance of microbial communities. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and validated a PAN-sample DNA isolation method that can be used for different LB samples, which can be applied to molecular epidemiological research and other areas.

[Definition and standardization of histocompatibility requests depending on patient course and donor type: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) and the Francophone Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (SFHI)]. / Définition et standardisation des bilans d'histocompatibilité en fonction du parcours du patient et du type de donneur : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC) et de la Société Francophone d'Histocompatibilité et Immunogénétique (SFHI).

Standardization of histocompatibility tests for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants, harmonization of information transmitted to clinicians are part of quality improvement and optimization of human and economic resources. New HLA typing technologies provide high-resolution information within a reasonable time frame. Knowledge of high-resolution HLA typing for the patient and their relatives is essential for a better interpretation of compatibilities. HLA-DPB1 typing must be considered in transplant field regardless of the donor type. The benefits of using search and match programs are considerable. It saves time and reduces additional typing costs by providing rapid information about the likelihood to identify a matched unrelated donor. A backup therapy considering alternative cell sources or treatment can therefore be quickly implemented. The importance of knowledge and consideration of patient immunization for donor choice was explored in previous workshops of the SFGM-TC (2018 and 2019). The published recommendations remain applicable. The routine follow-up protocol and in case of desensitization will be detailed here. This harmonization must be accompanied by the standardization of information to be returned to the clinician regarding the donor finding possibilities for the patient. This will guarantee a similar quality level in every center.

The Human Leukocyte Antigen-DPB1 Degree of Compatibility Is Determined by Its Expression Level and Mismatch Permissiveness: A German Multicenter Analysis.

T-cell epitope matching according to the TCE3 algorithm classifies HLA-DPB1 mismatches in permissive and non-permissive. This classification has been shown to be predictive for mortality and acute GvHD (aGvHD) events in large international cohorts. We retrospectively genotyped HLA-DPB1 in 3523 patients transplanted in Germany between 2000 and 2014 and in their unrelated donors using an Illumina amplicon-NGS based assay. Aim of the study was to evaluate DP-compatibility beyond the established TCE3 algorithm by assessing the combined effect of several DP-mismatch parameters on post-transplant outcome. We implemented an extended DP-mismatch assessment model where TCE3, DP allotype expression with respect to rs9277534, mismatch vector and number of mismatches were conjointly taken into consideration. In this model, non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches showed significantly increased aGvHD risk if they were accompanied by two HLA-DPB1 mismatches in GvH direction (HR: 1.46) or one mismatched highly expressed patient allotype (HR: 1.53). As previously reported, non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches associated with a significantly higher risk of aGvHD and non-relapse mortality (HR 1.36 and 1.21, respectively), which in turn translated into worse GvHD and relapse free survival (HR 1.13). Effects on GvL and GvHD appeared strongest in GvH-directed non-permissive mismatches. Our study results support the consideration of additional HLA-DPB1 mismatch parameters along with the established TCE3 matching algorithm for refinement of future donor selection. In particular, our findings suggest that DP non-permissiveness associated with two HLA-DPB1 mismatches or at least on highly expressed mismatched patient allotype should be avoided.

Identification of DPB1 Permissive Unrelated Donors Is Highly Likely.

HLA-DPB1 permissive matching based on T cell epitope (TCE) groups should be considered when selecting among equally matched HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors to improve patient survival. Previous studies have defined 3 TCE groups based on functional assays of alloreactivity. Combinations of donor and recipient DPB1 alleles with low immunogenic potential identify permissive donors, who provide no increased risk of mortality compared with DPB1-matched donors. To determine the likelihood of identifying a DPB1 permissive-matched (includes both allele-matched and DPB1-permissive mismatched) unrelated donor for patients with high-resolution matches at 10/10 HLA-A, -B,- C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 in the Be The Match Registry, preliminary search requests from United States' transplant centers for 595 DPB1-typed patients were evaluated for existence of a DPB1 permissive-matched donor, identified either among already typed donors or by prospective DPB1 typing. The baseline DPB1 permissive match rate was 69% and improved to 80% after additional donor DPB1 typing (median, 4 donors per patient). When seeking a 10/10-matched, young (18- to 32-year-old) donor in the registry, the probability of finding a DPB1 permissive-matched donor started lower at 59% and improved to 70% after additional DPB1 testing. Our results show that most patients with a 10/10 match can find a DPB1 permissive-matched donor.

Low expression of HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1 is associated with poor prognosis in pediatric adrenocortical tumors (ACT).

BACKGROUND: Low expression of HLA class II antigens has been associated with more aggressive disease in several human malignancies including adult adrenocortical tumors (ACT), but their clinical relevance in pediatric ACT needs to be investigated. PROCEDURE: This study analyzed the expression profile of three class II histocompatibility genes (HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1) in 58 consecutive pediatric ACT (13 adenomas and 45 carcinomas) by quantitative real time PCR and their association with clinical and biological features. HLA-DPA1 protein level was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: A significant association (P < 0.01) was observed between lower expression levels of the three genes analyzed and poor prognostic factors such as age ≥ 4 years, tumor size ≥ 200 cm(3), tumor weight ≥ 100 g, and metastatic disease; the presence of an unfavorable event and death. Underexpression of the HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1 genes were associated with lower 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.017, P < 0.001, and P = 0.017, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis showed that HLA-DPA1 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.029) when analyzed in association with stage IV, age and tumor size. Significantly lower EFS was also observed in patients with negative/weak immunostaining for HLA-DPA1 (P = 0.002). Similar results were observed when only patients classified as having carcinomas were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that lower expression of HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1 genes may contribute to more aggressive disease in pediatric ACT. HLA-DPA1 immunostaining may represent potential aggressiveness marker in this tumor.