Evaluation of carbapenem use in a tertiary hospital: antimicrobial stewardship urgently needed.

Background: China launched a 3-year rectification scheme for the clinical use of antibiotics in 2011, and a specific scheme for carbapenem use in 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of government policies on carbapenem use, and their correlation with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Methods: The study was divided into four stages: preintervention (2010), antimicrobial programme (2011-2013), post-antimicrobial programme (2014-2016) and carbapenem programme (2017). A point-score system was proposed for evaluating the rationality of carbapenem use, and evaluated based on the indications, microbial culture, single dose, interval, and duration. Any prescription without a global score of 10 points was judged as irrational. The trend was analyzed by regression analysis, and Spearman correlation analysis was used for testing the correlation. Findings: The rate of rational use of carbapenems was 29.7% in 2010, and increased by 55.5, 45.2, and 51.5% during the subsequent three stages. The rationality declined slightly during the post-antimicrobial programme (2014-2016) while the consumption of carbapenems was markedly increased. These two parameters improved slightly in 2017. Moreover, the prevalence of CRPA was significantly negatively correlated with the rate of rational carbapenem use (Coefficient = - 0.553, P < 0.05), and not with the consumption of carbapenems (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The rational application of carbapenems was related to government policies in this study, with irrational carbapenem use possibly related to the development of CRPA. The current point-score system could be a useful tool for performing assessments.

Treatment Options for Carbapenem- Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.

BACKGROUND: Rates of colonization and infection with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are on the rise, particularly in southeastern European countries, and this is increasingly true in Germany as well. The organisms in question include enterobacteriaceae such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli and non-fermenting bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. As the carbapenems have been the gold standard to date for the systemic treatment of serious infections with Gram-negative bacteria, carbapenem resistance presents new and difficult challenges in therapeutic decision-making, particularly because of the high frequency of coresistance. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on other applicable literature. RESULTS: Multiresistant Gram-negative (MRGN) pathogens are classified in Germany according to their resistance to four different classes of antibiotics; fluoroquinolones, piperacillin, third-generation cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Quadruple MRGN pathogens are resistant to all four groups, triple MRGN pathogens to three of them. There are a number of therapeutic alternatives to carbapenems that can be applied with the aid of sensitive microbiological and/or molecular genetic testing. The following antibiotics are often the only ones that can be used to treat quadruple MRGN pathogens: colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, fosfomycin, ceftazidime/avibactam, and ceftolozan/tazobactam. Carbapenems, too, may still be an option in certain situations. There is also evidence that combinations of antibiotics against which the pathogen is resistant individually can some- times be a valid treatment option; these include combinations of colistin with one or two carbapenems. CONCLUSION: The treatment of severe infection with carbapenem-resistant pathogens should be individualized and carried out in an interdisciplinary framework, in consideration of antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in each case. The treat- ment options are based on evidence from in vitro studies, retrospective studies, and case series, which must be interpreted with caution. Randomized clinical trials are needed to test each of the various combined approaches.

Quantification of the carbapenem antibiotic ertapenem in human plasma by a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method.

BACKGROUND: Ertapenem (Invanz) is a newly developed carbapenem beta-lactam antibiotic. LC-MS is the method of choice for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of a variety of drugs including antibiotics. No validated LC-MS method for ertapenem quantification is described in the literature so far. METHODS: A rapid and robust LC-MS quantification method for ertapenem was developed and validated for clinical routine application in plasma samples. After immediate stabilisation with MES buffer (pH 6.5), samples were prepared for LC-MS analysis using simple protein precipitation. LC-MS coupling was realised by the use of a Phenomenex Synergi 4micro Polar-RP A80 Mercury LC column (10 x 2.0 mm) in combination with a Single-MS (Agilent 1100 LC-MSD SL) operating in negative selected ion monitoring (SIM) detection mode with ceftazidime as internal standard for adequate selective and sensitive analysis. RESULTS: LC-MS method validation by means of determination of limit of detection (LOD 0.1 microg mL-1), lower limit of quantification (LLOQ 1 microg mL-1), linearity (0.1-50 microg mL-1), recovery (> 90%), intra- and inter-day precision (RSD < 10%), accuracy (> 90%), inter-subject variability (< 10% at LLOQ), drug stability in plasma (> 3 months) and in post-extracted samples (> 99% for 24 h), and matrix effects (process efficiency > 90%) showed excellent performance parameters considering Guidance for Industry - Bioanalytical Method Validation. CONCLUSION: This method is perfectly appropriate for routine quantification of ertapenem and possibly other polar carbapenem beta-lactam antibiotics.